Think Again: Adam Grant
Vložit
- čas přidán 27. 05. 2024
- Join bestselling author, Adam Grant, as he shares insights from his book, Think Again, on how to challenge your intuition, how to intake and implement criticism and establishing a challenge network to push your thinking to greater levels.
Guest Bio:
Adam Grant is an organizational psychologist and TED speaker who helps people find meaning and motivation at work.
Adam Grant has been Wharton’s top-rated professor for 7 straight years. As an organizational psychologist, he is a leading expert on how we can find motivation and meaning, and live more generous and creative lives. He has been recognized as one of the world’s 10 most influential management thinkers and Fortune’s 40 under 40.
To learn more, visit: www.franklincovey.com/
Connect with us on Twitter: / franklincovey
Connect with us on LinkedIn: / franklincovey
Subscribe to FranklinCovey On Leadership and receive weekly videos, tools, articles, and podcasts to help you become a better leader: pages.franklincovey.com/2018-...
" I am here not to prove myself, I am here to improve myself"
12.42
🙂
“The point of learning is to evolve your beliefs not to validate them.” ❕❕
he doesn't blink :)
Out of this world makes you different. Let’s keep this on the low.
Lol
Snake
Thanks for sharing 👏Nice layout, got some new book titles 😉👊
I enjoyed the way the interviewer conduct this interview.
I'll be picking this book here in Bangkok
Very well said. Lots to learn!!
Adam - another amazing interview
Such an exciting and wonderful thought process coming from Psychology prof. Adam Grant. We need to do "THINK AGAIN" in this VUCA World and constantly realign ourselves to the happenings as organizations as well as Individuals. I appreciate wholeheartedly the introspection method based on current data as well as intuition(gut feeling).
I loved this interview but did he not blink at all??
Great interview!
Amazing content as always!
great book think more like an artist being yourself. reimagine and harness energy for others in our faith!! Chess, Martial Art. Prodigy Math, practice and reflect, that how i live my life be yourself and be an artist!! Reimagine better rethink
Great episode!
God bless you all Amen 🙏
21:11 Confident Humility
Ask for feedback.
Criticise yourself. ( Self-analysis)
Know your Emotional triggers. Learn, How to handle them. #mindfulness #meditation yinqi helps. #DrSRanjan
Harmony creators.. Agreeable Givers.
Great Company: People are the Company.
Great Culture: Peoples are more interested in elevated each other.
How to Open mind? mine n other's. How I practice what I like n preach.
awesome book shelfs
This is the book I was so looking for, as a hyper comservative I wanna see things from a new perspective
Me being a little more on the Liberal side would also like to learn more on the Conservative side.
I admire both your convictions and I am here as a centrist - to see more of what conservatives see that liberals don’t and vice versa.
An interesting study was done on anterior cingulate cortex vs amygdala regarding political views. It really explains a lot.
Great conversation
Absolutely love Adam Grant ...this talk was brilliant...i had already devoured the book and this talk was like the cherry on the cake...Adam Grants confident humility just soaked each of the 60+ trillion cells of my being... refreshing indeed........so grateful to Franklin Convey and it's Anchor for the questions he asked...🙏🪔🌻
I need a challenge network of my own
I think a challenger network vs supporter network depends on that person’s status. If CEO doing well, naturally most people around would be supporters.
32.20 My husband is an engineer AND Lawyer 😂 but he's also a giver 😍
💘
data drive kowledge is still a matter of perspective to the receiver of it
I don't know if I buy it or not. I strongly feel that once an individual gains some notoriety any specific area of research/understanding they tend to overwhelmingly gain traction in their popularity. I'm not saying his ideas are illegitimate, nor am I necessarily criticizing him in any way. I simply feel that there are more things worth considering when making any pseudo-certain statements in which "define" some phenomenon, or illustrate patterns of success. He had discussed the correlation between how much or little an individual procrastinates in regards to that person's level of creativity using some carefully thought out experiments. Again, I'm not trying to say I know any better, nor that his conclusions were inaccurate. I am positing that the explanation and his explanation of the correlation is vastly oversimplifying the number of variables that determine whether a company becomes successful, a product is known as "disruptive" , or any pattern suggested to be responsible for some set outcome. Think about just a few of any individual seen as one of the most successful individuals in the past few decades. Then try to limit the number of variables likely responsible for their success from how they came up with the idea/product that helped them break into a such a role to whether or not that product or idea would've been nearly as successful if the timing(in years/decades) was different. Think of the geographical location in which the idea/product was launched, by whom or which company, given the current events of the time, all of the possible alternative differences that could have been different between the planning and development stage. My overall point is that I feel as if it's somewhat of a waste of time to attempt to model certain behaviors or to follow certain patterns that have been claimed, using experimental data or purely using educated guesses, to produce some given outcome. He seems like a very well meaning individual who has spent a lot of time trying to both educate and help others; obviously with nothing but good intentions. However, as a society I believe they we more often seek to emulate others who we look to as models for success instead of spending more time understanding ourselves, our societies, our institutions before seeking to make predictive assertions of what the world needs. I'd read an article that had posited that something like 80% of the most highly respected scientific journal articles amount to very little overall. It had suggested that even our most respected universities are overwhelmingly missing the mark. I'm simply an individual who is profoundly interested in many areas of traditional science and human behavior. I sincerely do not claim to know better than anyone else but I do believe that we've seemed to put less and less thought into philosophy in regards to certainty and truth and I find it to be somewhat evident in our collective "ego" if there is such a thing. In the certainty and belief that we have become more intelligent as a species linearly over time. I dare argue against this assertion and believe that the technologically driven society we live in today inhibits our tendency to give credence to what we feel we know. Sorry for my long rant. I don't mean to offend anyone nor claim that I know anything more than anyone else. I find the idea of truth to be ambiguous and highly dependent on one's own life experience.
Facts, proof, truth, listen, learn? Collaboration with respect?
S'il vous plaît traduction au français
Adam Grant? Isn't he the guy on Jurassic Park??? Oops! That's ALAN Grant. 😅
I loved this interview but did he not blink at all??