Sean Carroll: What’s The Evidence of Alien Tech?
Vložit
- čas přidán 23. 05. 2024
- Join my mailing list briankeating.com/list to win a real 4 billion year old meteorite! All .edu emails in the USA 🇺🇸 will WIN!
Is there any evidence of alien technology, or even alien life, in the universe? Sean Carroll weighs in.
If you liked this clip, watch the full interview with Sean Carroll: • Sean Carroll: The Bigg...
Additional resources:
➡️ Follow me on your fav platforms:
✖️ Twitter: / drbriankeating
🔔 CZcams: czcams.com/users/DrBrianKeatin...
📝 Join my mailing list: briankeating.com/list
✍️ Check out my blog: briankeating.com/cosmic-musings/
🎙️ Follow my podcast: briankeating.com/podcast
Into the Impossible with Brian Keating is a podcast dedicated to all those who want to explore the universe within and beyond the known.
Make sure to subscribe so you never miss an episode!
#intotheimpossible #briankeating #seancarroll - Věda a technologie
![Adam Frank: Are We About To Discover Aliens? [Ep. 425]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ajSz9ljfsFc/mqdefault.jpg)
*Do aliens exist in our galaxy?*
it's never aliens. its one of the best cover stories invented by our government and one of the best ways to sell books when you lack creative writing skills
For me, I think very likely but probably only single celled.
@@Lightbearer616 agreed
Best most awesomist podcast on the internet❤
We are someone else's aliens...if there is anyone else out there.
I think a reason we might never be visited by or at least communicate with aliens, is because of how rare the Sun-Earth system is in universe.
The Sun-Earth system is very common in the universe.
From our current science, there are 10^22 habitable planets in the universe.
Why are you so silly?
@bimmjim The commenter said sun-earth SYSTEM friend.. If you think THAT is Silly, then perhaps you are a little myopic or biased ? Whether or not a planet is within its stars' "goldilocks zone" is not the only issue.. In my humble opinion, there is a VAST array of additional factors that would nearly certainly play a necessary role for a technological species to evolve OTHER than solely simplistic numbers of stars and attendant planets.. A tiny few of those necessary configurations are: a very long-term stable environment, including the planets parent star, and the orbital mechanics of all the bodies in the system, a giant planet near the OUTSKIRTS of the system, a large moon at the right distance to stabilize the host planet, the right mix of water and land, a nearby supernova to seed the planet with critical minerals and hydrocarbons, and on and on.. I think the opening commenter was not silly at all.. Peace.
We're the aliens
I love the thumbnail. It's Never Aliens! But personally i think Sometimes it's Aliens.. 👽 🛸
I think it is almost a certainty that microbial life is abundant though out the universe which obviously includes our solar system.. It would seem to be an unreasonable chauvinistic bias to think otherwise.. Life sprang up HERE shortly (relatively speaking) after our planet cooled down.. Technological species should be quite rare due to wildly unstable environments, like ours has been..It seems likely that 10 or less technological cultures exist at any given time in our galaxy.. Unless we escape and colonize other worlds, we too will probably go extinct someday as 99.9 percent of the prior species here already have..One opinion on the matter..Peace..
Duration of Life on Earth ~ 4 billion years. Duration of "advanced" civilization < .0000001 of that time. Crudely, 1 on 10 million planets with life will have advanced civilizations. 1 on 1 million if they manage to stay alive for 1000 years instead of 100. But how many eer make it to simple life and how many of those realized advanced forms.
You forgot --> The universe is 14,000,000,000 years old.
We are not even the most advanced species on earth let alone the galaxy.
"All things being equal". I dislike that term almost as much as "and what not". Neither statement is actually saying or proving anything. What even is all things, and how are they equal?
It merely means that, if what we understand to be true is true everywhere then we can extrapolate an answer.
@@Fstop5.6 It still rarely applies. It also assumes that humans have everything figured out, which they have clearly not.
Are we advanced technological life?
So far as we currently know, we are the “most” advanced technologically and the “most” advanced intelligent life…
We know that there are phenomenon happening at different places nuclear bases and spots all around the world what what we don't know is whether this phenomenon is alien or terrestrial just of a different time... or maybe it is what I theorize the most likely scenario higher spatial dimensional influence... after all if we are not the highest spatial Dimension then we would expect to see the relative shape or state of the universe as flat which we do observe...
Sean Carroll comes across as having a pretty theology based take on this.
He is a declared atheist. Keating however, believes in a god.
How so? He says we have to go look and collect more data, and that we can't just assume there's life everywhere. That doesn't sound "theology based" to me.
When it’s aliens, it’s top secret!
let your guest talk.
Sean "the science has been settled" Carroll.
yikes. Come for Sean Carroll, get Brian Keating. 😒
Win, win situation 🤓👍
Well said.
Why does Keating keep returning to this subject ??
We've got him wondering.
[I've met Aliens, 8 times.]
"And the cow and the bear shall feed; their young ones shall lie down together: and the lion shall eat straw like the ox." Is Einstein the cow, and am I the Bear? Or is Judeo Christian prophecy a patentably offensive for Biden, Newsom, the Pope or you, Keating, Carroll? 1 magnetic energy density of solar wind = (general relativity maximal power/(t_Λ(4 π l_Λ c^2)))
It’s never the Aliens… until it is.
yep - it's the "all swans are white" hypothesis from the 1800's. All swans were known to be white, until white man got to western Australia, where there are black swans.
Sean Carroll, I love you, so I am here to help your brilliant mind get brilliantier (French). I would say the year a motion camera was invented, motion studio opened, and movie presented at a world fair year. all in a year, anything else happen suddenly around that exact time that seems sus, or was everyone taking their idea for a new product to invent help. It went from tying keys onto kites to this magnificent channel. For it Tis not possible to explain the unexplainable it mustn't. California was empty not long ago and now all those miners are mincrafters. IDK
A great imagination and a total lack of understanding about what would actually be required for aliens to get here.
Brian, the reasonable scientific theist, always, with the intended to disprove the possibility of life elsewhere. “ there’s no proof of life anywhere else, but earth, not even in our own solar system.” he says that even though we have little to no data points. You can’t look at one grain of sand and say there’s no white on the beach. We have yet to go to the most interesting places in our own backyard.
Brian is pretty transparent in that he wants to buffer this notion to defend his theist views. It doesn’t matter what the guest speaker says, he goes right back into his typical talking points. “It wouldn’t change anything”
The world is a very different place now, first of all. Do the social media many more people would become aware of such a discovery, and said, discovery would most likely have better confirmation with where we plan to go in the technology. We have now to confirm it. At the time of that announcement, anecdotally, speaking, most the people I knew were very skeptical. It was also proven very wrong very quickly. At that time, the type of people that actually knew about it, were the same type of people that would look into the results.
Clinton lost the Nobel Prize on that one.
Hate from Canada
why even talk to sean carroll? my very least favorite physicist.
Nobody cares!
He's awesome! Why even make this negative comment?
Any particular reason he’s your least favorite?
Couldnt agree more he 2 materialistic
@@lenspencer1765 yes. very dogmatic. very rigid.. no imagination.