Michio Kaku is IN CONTROL! (361)
Vložit
- čas přidán 2. 06. 2024
- Please join my mailing list here 👉 briankeating.com/list to win a meteorite 💥
There is a God equation in mathematics; could there be a God equation in physics? Is Michio Kaku back in control 😂
This is the question to which Dr. Michio Kaku has dedicated his life. Dr. Kaku is a theoretical physicist, bestselling author, acclaimed public speaker, renowned futurist, and popularizer of science. As co-founder of String Field Theory, Dr. Kaku carries on Einstein’s quest to unite the four fundamental forces of nature into a single grand unified theory.
In this repost episode of Into the Impossible from 2021, Dr. Kaku and I embark on a quest to find this theory of everything. We discuss artificial intelligence, string theory, God, agnosticism, how to become the next Einstein and one of my favorite books - The God Equation.
Tune in!
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @drbriankeating
Intro (00:00)
Could an advanced AI create a game like chess? (02:08)
Balancing fame with physics (04:17)
Has particle physics been dormant for the last 50 years? (08:16)
Rivals to the string theory (17:48)
Different laws for different universes (24:46)
Is string theory falsifiable? (30:18)
What agnosticism means to Michio (37:50)
Is there a step before a grand unified theory? (40:35)
What connects the string theory to God? (43:09)
Michio’s parents were interned during WWII (46:23)
Outro (53:00)
-
Additional resources:
📚 The God Equation by Michio Kaku: a.co/d/bo4MDC2
📺 Watch my most popular videos:
Neil Turok • Why Neil Turok Believe...
Frank Wilczek • Nobel Prizewinner Fran...
Eric Weinstein vs. Stephen Wolfram • Stephen Wolfram vs. Er...
Sir Roger Penrose: • Nobel Prize in Physics...
Sabine Hossenfelder: • “I Don’t Care About Yo...
Avi Loeb: • UFOs & UAPs: The Situa...
➡️ Follow me on your fav platforms:
✖️ Twitter: / drbriankeating
🔔 CZcams: czcams.com/users/DrBrianKeatin...
📝 Join my mailing list: briankeating.com/mailing_list
✍️ Check out my blog: briankeating.com/blog.php
🎙️ Follow my podcast: briankeating.com/podcast
Into the Impossible with Brian Keating is a podcast dedicated to all those who want to explore the universe within and beyond the known.
Make sure to subscribe so you never miss an episode!
#intotheimpossible #briankeating #michiokaku
~-~~-~~~-~~-~
Please watch: "Neil DeGrasse Tyson: Plays the Race Card!"
• Neil DeGrasse Tyson Hi...
~-~~-~~~-~~-~ - Věda a technologie
![Did This NEW Theory of Gravity Solve the Expanding Universe? Claudia de Rham [Ep. 419]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/NqION4He4IQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Kaku can win nobel prize in comedy, guy is hilarious af
He is working on a problem that hasn't had a solution in over 70 years ... they still don't have it.
Michiu Kaku often speaks aimlessly. That diatribe about wolf pecking orders did not contribute anything to his conclusion about how far we are from artificial general intelligence.
It's also factually wrong. Dogs know we aren't dogs, just how they interact with each other vs us. They get super excited to see other dogs, they don't react the same way to see a person walking down the sidewalk.
Also, alpha authority in wolf packs has been debunked. It's like he's trying to be wrong in as many ways as he can.
Also not to mention his very poor knowledge about quantum computers...he was also the seller of "positive thinking vibration" 10-15 years ago...so I think for him it might be good to enjoy his pension...
@@uninspired3583 Bruh you're just jealous. Michio always sniffs butts when he greets new people he doesn't know. Thats why he says dogs think we're dogs. He's just way more alpha than any of us.
He just wants to talk to have fun, useless
I’m really starting to question the sanity of both these guys
same here.
imo most visionaries need a little edge to them, it feels natural as that's why you've gone so far outside of a common living.
Michio Kaku, master of making outlandish claims with no evidence behind them. This man's a con artist.
I’m glad someone else can see this!
There is a big difference between a media "luvie" and a con man. A con man has something useless to sell, a media luvie is trying to sell themselves.
He is a media luvie looking for a wage from an audience. It's easier than doing science.
Physics is full of media luvies, Brian Cox, Brian Green, Mr Tyson. The list is long.
@@shmick4203 yes, yes yes YES !!!
Yep...I'm with Eric W....
Electro-Positronic Field: -ve gas binds a ball of +ve cells freed by Full Escape Energy as electron-positron pairs
+ve/-ve Particles: pull in/pump out then pump out/pull in -ve gas that collides at the centre and spirals out at 90'
Spin: lateral outflow force cancels in all directions but motion increases -ve gas intake, biasing spin at 90' to travel
Magnetism: spin flows straight to a neighbour. Energy conservation and field balance preservation cause external circuits
Mass: inward -ve gas flow acceleration drags spheres of cells further apart inwardly but closer laterally to a packed core
Gravity: like mass but slower acceleration with drag on field cells cancelled by dark energy so cells remain equidistant
Dark Energy: more -ve gas near mass shrinks field, expanded by less in voids + new matter creation / black hole growth
Heavy Force: mass multiplier mechanism pulls in field before annihilating all heavy composite particle cores but protons
Heavy Fusion: in the Big Bang (and stars?) 2 positrons oppositely hit 1 electron (more than 2 electrons hit 1 positron)
Proton: (pep) 3 core particles heavily fused. The 2 half neutralised positrons repel each other preventing annihilation
Neutron: (pep_e). Beta- radiation loses the electron, beta+ is a new positron expelled and electron retained by a proton
Positronium: (e_p) 0 core particles, muon (ep_e) 2 core, tau (epep_e) 4 core. Neutron mass is halfway between muon and tau
Antimatter: 1,2 e_p pairs annihilate, 3 make a muon or proton+anti muon/proton, 4 a neutron+anti neutron, 5 a tau+anti tau
Lifespan: (anti) muons/taus at close to electric force speed (C) barely feel it but Heavy Force takes over when they slow
Nuclear Force: neutron electrons bond to protons. Mass and magnetism compacts and strengthens the nucleus
Black Hole: converts all matter to heavy force e+p crystal with a slowly annihilating centre, preventing a singularity
Photon: compressed, concentrated -ve gas wave core pulls in field cells as it passes. Field warps diffract and interfere
2 Slit Experiment: photon/particle field warps diffract and interfere, guiding the core. Detectors interfere with guides
Entanglement: field physically links objects but there could be hidden variables (ie. absolute temporal synchronisation)
Kaku is repeating himself at this point. He’s “Out of control” 😂
Dogs don't think we are dogs. That's not science.
In 1972 I was a sophomore at FIT in Melbourne Fl. All students, even those who studied economics,. were required to take a year of chemistry, physics, and different fields of math. But at no time were we ever exposed to particle physics. The closest we came was chemistry. I despised physics during those years, but learned to love it many years later on an amature level after reading books by Hawking, Kaku, Greene, Susskind and the like. Interviews like this are worth their weight in gold, IMHO.
Physical chemistry (P-Chem) is I was told, (too late) is the key to chemistry and the fun part.
Element 115
Michio is gonna say verbatim, what he always says. The picture of Einsteins desk, and his mom wondering why cant he just get a nice Japanese girlfriend
The thumbnail is just good trolling.Well done Dr Keating 😅😂😂
sometimes the troll isn't worth the cringe
Whoever manages to bring him in control wins the psycho-therapist nobel price.
*Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts (Richard Feynman)*
He is absolutely correct. The general public need figures who can make physics interesting to them. In turn, physicists need the public to become more interested. It’s a win for everyone.
So Michio's response to the criticisms of string theory is basically "Haters are just jealous" lol
I'm jealous too, I want money without performance but their sermon is more fun than in church😟
Sacred (fixed) geometry is the key for understanding the creation of the Universe. Tetrahedron is the building block of our reality. Space, time and consciousness are the three points of reference required for us to be aware of who we are and where we are. Our reality is built on a 9 dimensional model as symbolised by the Metatron's Cube.
One thing I like about Mr. Keiting is his willingness to listen and learn from his expert guest along with his subscribers.
It makes me have some hope, if you will, if understanding string theory is also complicated for all of us to understand, including Mr. Keiting 👍🤣👍
Such a great episode! Cheers Dr. k. You’ve been killing it & glad I’ve found you via Rogan. Much love from Texas 🫡
🤓Rogan for President! Maybe✌️
Schrodinger laughing from beyond the grave 😂
This was an enjoyable learning process with the two of you... and it was a good joke at the end of the conversation, truly funny. I laughed immediately.
Sometimes I wish we could find a perfect internet theory to end poor streaming quality.
Yes indeed outrageous that he even uploads this, smh.
Another excellent interview, sir.
And for the record, I thought the foot joke was nearly priceless.
Thank you, very much. 🙏
My Uncle Ned developed a Theory for Everything a d hid it in THE Alien ship the government is covering up...
This is tantalizing Dr. Keating.
We really need to have Eric Weinstein and Michio have a discussion.
It would be entertaining and maybe we call could all learn something.
String theory is a hack 😅
Brian, love the showing your foot response to the professor at Case Western, following the ID test (for birds) 😂😂😂. I had a similar experience at Iowa State, having to ID 100 plus trees from their twigs.
I've always been fascinated by physics, mathematics, and chess. While I may not be able to match the expertise of these brilliant minds, I've discovered that I have a knack for solving puzzles that even they struggle with. Whether it's deciphering a board game strategy, repairing a malfunctioning appliance, tinkering with a gasoline engine, or devising an innovative solution to an everyday problem, I see it all as a form of puzzle-solving.
Inspired by this perspective, I'd like to present my own string theory puzzle. Initially, I envisioned using a stick for this thought experiment, as pushing something seemed more intuitive than pulling it. So, let's imagine we have an extraordinarily rigid, non-stretchable string. If we tug on one end, does the other end react instantaneously? If so, let's insert our string between the Earth and the Moon and pull on the Earth end. Would it instantaneously tug on the Moon? To eliminate the influence of gravity, let's place the string in outer space. And to ensure we don't disrupt the molecules or create a shockwave, let's pull the string gently. Now, let's attempt to prove this with a formula: [0+0=0].
While I recognize this may appear as a simplistic thought experiment, I'm genuinely curious why no scientist has addressed it directly. I understand that some of you may attempt to answer this question, but I kindly request that you present your credentials alongside your response. I hold an Associate of Science degree in Electromechanical Engineering Technology from 1973, and I've spent years fixing broken objects. What have you fixed?
not that my opinion matters to the good doctor but i would like to formally apologize to Dr Kaku. I can't really pinpoint where I acquired this opinion but I thought he was more of a popularizer and youtube scientist than a practicing, cutting edge physicist. btw I think being the former is a huge bonus to mankind so I never thought that was a bad thing. I hit ~22 min in and realized Michio is right there with all the brilliant physicists/mathematicians I listen to incessantly and comprehend sporadically :) Thanks Dr Kaku and Prof Brian.
Michio is ok. And Michio’s string theory in itself isn’t a bad idea. He is 100% correct that elementary particles are NOT to be seen as little erratic moving biljart balls, but excitations of one and the same omnipresent field, where the different orthogonal modes they can vibrate in, determining their classification. Where string theory DOES next lose the plot is that such vibrational distortions can’t be actually cut-off from the fabric as ‘loose’ objects. A Universal equilibrium always requires connectivity to the all-engulfing spacetime fabric, that Einstein called ‘aether’ in his 1920 `Leiden lecture’ closing words. I urge anyone to read these closing words. Only if attached, can orthogonal vibrations, cause longitudinal contractions in the same fabric, which -o surprise- is what causes gravity in the first place. As such, the true theory of gravity is Einstein special relativity where speed causes vibrations in the fabric it moves in, contracting frontal space and time, which is wrapped in a standing wave of orthogonal ‘quanta’ of windings around the speeding object thus ‘giving it’ extra mass (inverse time) and energy (inverse space). This is why space and time are not each others ‘equivalent’ and neither are energy and mass (Penrose got that right!). We don’t NEED a ToE, as we already have one. For 100 years we were told not to look under our feet. Is suggest we do and start applying it if we want to become a spacefaring species…
I will believe it when there is actual evidence to support it.
That is an interesting idea, I'm with you that particles cannot be viewed as independent from the fabric that encompasses them. And even when you said speed causes vibrations in the fabric contracting space and time, I could understand it as a rephrasing of time dilation and length contraction. But when you said, "wrapped in a standing wave of orthogonal ‘quanta’ of windings around the speeding object thus ‘giving it’ extra mass (inverse time) and energy (inverse space)." I feel this is pure conjecture, have you done any calculations to demonstrate that such a formulation is equivalent to current predictive theory?
Mr Michio created String Theory to solve an equation that Einstein was working on when he died....
@@michael-4k4000 and actual detection of strings?
Another great interview, keep it up!
Man, I loved your answer to that professor to figure out your name from your footprint. 😂
🙏 I Was a wise @$$
If you can't find a unicorn, you're not looking very hard.
Rhinoceros Unicornis: The one-horned rhino, also called the Indian Rhino.
Thats what all references to Unicorns was referring to until the 15th century.
Great conversation , great interview. Thank You , Prof. Keating for this video.
Kaku, has literally repeated everything he said in the podcast , verbatim on a 1000 other interviews .
He’s a bit of a weird one. Ask Jim Norton.
Eric Weinstein is right
To me he talks what sounds like science to the uneducated and sounds like empty fluff to me
@@yrebrac1000% with you.
He's definitely crazy
Like Eric says, Michio is out of control!
This was great. Mr. Kaku getting away from a script.
He's also getting away from science, logic and reason. But, hey, batshit sells books : )
Law of conservation of Energy and Matter. Was talking on a Facebook account disciples of Micchio Kaku. Talking about teleportation. In a stabilized Singularity there would no room for any addition of energy in the form matter to the singularity. That energy would have to go somewhere. Hawkings solution would create matter on a "Reciever" another stabilized singularity. Wolfgang Pauli's quantum coupling postulated at that time of the effect of recreating and transmitting any object thru both Space and Time.
WOW! I do not believe in string theory but after this absolutely spectacular podcast I believe there may be some validity which has never once happened in my life to be even just only slightly remotely convinced of anything without massive research first. To top it all off. I absolutely laughed my ass off at the last minute with the funny bird foot🦅to person foot🦶story.
I’m looking forward to this episode. Thanks!
That 60 passenger school bus that could get 50 MPG. Dad ended that in the 1980's. Therefore, when do we reinvent what we already had?
OK then the first time I saw a B1B bomber disappear was in 2021. Our Airforce has this now.
Branes consist of woven Strings for a combined String-Brane Theory.
“Michio Kaku is out of control”
REDBARS WATCHING
At 34:11 Michio says we effectively know the inverse square law for gravity works at the galaxy scale, but, does it ? isn't frame dragging that very thing that makes Newtonian gravity fall to pieces ? outer arms of spirals moving much faster than they should ?
Can't even stop killing each other.
Word
It's an interesting question, how well can we expect to perform in creative generation, an AI trained on an annotated list of historically successful competitive table games? From the likes of Go and Chess to the likes of Backgammon and Dices. At most a dozen, possibly half that. Except ML as we know it is about digesting "grass", not "chocolate"... Ok, suppose we start with the simpler task to decide on the order in which to array existing board games while educating on them all. AI should be up to the task of picking a consistent order when commanded to place some selected game either at the beginning, or in the middle, or at the end of the array of successful games all selected for good example value. Then, AI could pore over the question of how to select among all these array orderings, the one(s) best fit to welcome extension by a beneficial additional member: which in turn would count once obtained, as witness to the I in AI;)
I do not know a single scientist who has a theory that isn't just a theory for NOW...
Don't forget that even aprox 100 years ago Einsteins theory for gravitational waves took science a century to proof. The further we zoom in the harder and more time consuming it will be to proof something.
I was never taught about Quantum Physics in college. I had no idea that the quantum world didn’t follow regular world rules.
What do you call the regular world? Is it classical mechanics?
I think String Theory ended physics envy. The nuances of the standard model and GR are cool, but setting to have a single parameter model that fills in the SM constant that winds up with infinity parameters and extra dimensions, making zero testable predictions in 50 years is not something to envy.
Brian please get Ed Witten on.
At 29:42 Dr. Kaku says no, membranes and strings have not been unified, when in fact Witten formulated M-Theory in 1995 which unifies all four sting theory versions with membranes (branes). Sorry but Kaku is biased and not being honest.
Back to your question, yes, this is the most comprehensive theory that literally compactifies everything we know about physics into one framework. The problem is the general populace simply does not understand how brilliant the theory is because they are too lazy or don't have time to study how complicated it is. The commutation relations between spin operators are similar to those of the quantum oscillator. The spin values are also quantized with only integer and half integer values. Stern-Gerlach revealed the electrons have half integer due to their opposite orientations + and - when a stream of electrons passes through the magnetic field. Photons have full integer spin 1 unit of angular momentum since they are quanta of the EM field which have U(1) gauge symmetry. Gravitons have spin 2 units of angular momentum moving along the z axis with no polarization but conform to the Einstein field equations with the Rank 2 Ricci curvature tensor. The quantum field is a constant fluctuation of these energy modes exchanging quanta back and forth with interactions between all the names we derived for these "particles" and their "force carriers". But!! We need more degrees of freedom than 4D spacetime since gravitons are so weak in flat space that they "leak" into higher dimensions (sub-manifolds in the quantum vacuum) that our detectors have no hope of seeing with current technologies. Just because our macroscopic instruments can't see a string does not mean its wrong or not there.
It makes a difference, getting definitions on-screen. Not being a mathematician or physicist I, they begin the breakdown of the topic. Physicists and mathematicians are, as was stated, only human, and so are these topics, topics of of incredible interest
Wow Brian, you really seem enthralled with Michio in this one. Could you ask him please if has lately calculated anything practical, like effective quark masses in a proton or its parton distribution from scratch? That would sure be handy ;) to some of us....
Brian says to his professor, "Here, smell my foot!" ;)
Thanks for this podcast Brian. I want to catch the one with Susskind next. I need more education on the holographic principle.
Why is information not allowed to be destroyed? I think the holographic principle is nonsense.
@@joqqy8497 I have no idea, I just listened to a bit of a Susskind lecture on it and it seemed like an intriguing principle. However wouldn't it be analogous to wiping a hard-drive? It could be debated the information that is destroyed is fairly useless, and actually it might be soley following the second law of thermodynamics (by converting energy/matter into another form)
I think Michi conflates his vague equations with the more specific findings of later researchers. Sabine brings up the constant series of revisions that string theorists had to adopt to be consistent with emerging experimental data. Then again, the conventional view of expansion and the Big Bang need to come up with all sorts of excuses and arbitrary modifications to explain why surface brightness of stars is constant with distance, why there are so many large and complex galaxies and massive black holes so many light years away that they would have to have been produced at a time when Big Bangers say galaxies couldn't have formed, so much less lithium and more helium than they predicted in certain old stars, so much smoothing in the CMB, so much more matter than predicted by Big Bang.
I like the foot joke Brian ! Very good. 💫
At 39:20 Dr. Kaku refers to the "god of Spinoza" . This sometimes makes me recall the second pilot film of Star Trek TOS where Kirk's friend gains superior knowledge after his ESP is increased by an energy field making him god-like. While reading Spinoza, he comments that Spinoza's philosophy is "childlike".
Well children are closer to the source, they are not as locked in and decided in their ways. Often children can offer wisdom we forget as we get older. Not always, but sometimes things that resonate with the a young person can be more profound than expected.
I am a big critic of ST but only because it has been presented as established fact. No it should not be abandoned, it should be studied and appreciated as a 'tentative theory" until we have some physical evidence. Lab results. Experiments.
Until we "have some evidence"? Lol.
@@IndianArma nice fail on the quote there
Take the latent energy of a proton, divide it by the vacuum energy of a plank volume = number of plank monads needed to keep a proton propped up and existing. Now you can extrapolate the total spacetime ‘footprint’ of a single proton. X number of plank volumes transact creating the geodesics that surround and permeate through said proton. This implies the gravitational field boundary of a proton is finite. Someone piggy back, or tell me why the concept couldn’t be used to re-approach GR as a more granular and transactional theory than it is today.
As an experimentalist my self back in the seventies working with interactions between atoms. This involved atom beams where one beam containing one atom would cross another beam of atoms at 90 degrees and calculating potentials. Interesting when the velocities were just right you would notice an irregular plot. Calculating the wavelength of the atom at lambda = h/mv with the mass and velocities close the the diameter of the atom being struck one notices complete absence of the particle position being measured. Common physics says this is equivalent to interference patterns and is a quantum effect. However let’s pretend that diffraction and inference were never discovered. Then one would calculate these “bands” as the result of the forces between these atoms colliding would simply mean that the forces between them are not smooth but broken up because forces in fact are made up of discrete energy packets and simple calculations using tangent formulas. Example the famous billiard balls collision model in grade 12 physics of two billiard balls can be also represented by 2 circular boats with man A in Boat A and Man B in boat B both have 5 bowling balls at the bottom. man in in either boat one and a pile of bowling balls. So instead of actual colliding they interact by throwing and catching bowling balls. Point towards each other and as they get close man A throws one bowling ball in boat B and Boat B moves off at angle theta T1 and boat A also moves off at angle T1. Repeat and throw 2 balls and they move off at angle T2. Repeat with 3 balls and 4 balls ….. and they move off at angles T3 T4 ….. see what’s happening that smooth cross sectional now becomes stepped just like an interference patterns. So using virtual particles as transferring the force it is easily seen as to why atom beam collisions show interference patterns like light does through a single slit. Yukawa potentials easily calculates this without any ridiculous assumptions that particles or photons travel as a wave and only when there is a collision does it’s wave function collapse. After numerous arguments in the faculty club which I always won I was told I didn’t understand Schrödinger’s wave equations. Ya sure. Those damn theorists need to get their butts in a lab or outside and look through a telescope. I am convinced that all these ridiculous models from string theory, quantum gravity, many worlds theory, matrix theories…. Shows we are essentially akin to Ptolemy’s stage before Copernicus came around and showed that going from a earth cantered model to a sun centred model made pages of calculations and elaborate models of geometrical shapes just to get close to predicting the motions of the planets and Copernicus model was just a simple few lines to calculate. When I see the words dark and infinities I simply turn off. Physics should not be taking as faith was in the church view that we were the centre of the universe. Most of these cosmological theories are based mostly on faith and their proponents are its bishops and maybe the string theorist’s the Pope. Lol
Applying for money during the cold war: "Russia!" "How much?" I love that!
After the cold war: "Will we find God with your machine?" "We will find the Higgs boson!" "So now we have to sing for our supper" I love that last quote even more. Not that this situation is any good for science, but I love Michio's metaphors and at least we get plenty of science lectures to watch.
Before we look to AI for wisdom we should remember it has been nowhere and suffered nothing.
“Fearful host” 😆 I don’t mean this as an insult I promise but Mitchio has a way of talking that I find annoying, like the meanderings of someone profoundly confused. He gets far too much credit for his output.
Lol i laughed at bird track joke😂
The problem with critiquing String Theory is that people ignore that it was developed in the same spirit as of all of the solutions of Einstein's field equations. Schwarzschild, Einstein, deSitter, Friedmann, LeMaitre, Robertson, Walker, etc... all came up with solutions of the field equations that they never thought would be tested. In the spirit of shameless self-promotion :), my research was on the Bianchi cosmologies, and I published several results with colleagues in this area, but these also have not been (and probably will not be) tested in my lifetime. Even with respect to inflation, most cosmologists who "believe" in it have no experimental justification for picking the form of the inflaton potential that they do, and why they always evolve the KG equation in a flat/homogenous/isotropic spacetime. String theory is also a theoretical result in which folks are trying to answer the ultimate question: can gravity and QM be unified? It is exciting that they can be theoretically, in the same way Kaluza and Klein unified gravity and E&M in 5 dimensions (for which most people also believe but for which has no experimental evidence).
So I won’t take String theory as a scientific theory until it gives me measurable predictions. That is the basic minimum for something to be scientific. I really like it because it’s elegant. I personally suspect that it’s neither of the mentioned theories, not String theory, not quanten loop gravity, something either little known today or something nobody has thought up yet.
I suspect Wolfram is right, and it has to do with graph theory.
@@cybervigilante that would be possible, have seen some interesting ideas involving graph theory. But at least I haven't seen anything "mature" enough yet to really do anything with it.
Dr Michio Kaku is 76 now, 78 and 83, 85 will be ages when he will give great knowledge to humanitya as to be known as Einstein.
My opinion pre-video is that all avenues should be looked at and tried. I would give preference to any physical experiment.
I think the real problem lies in people's understanding of infinity. Many approaches have broken down as they start to approached infinity. A good question to ask; Is there a limit to the infinity.
Remember how introducing a limit in blackbody radiation led towards quanta and eventually to quantum physics.
Now back to the video....
I often have visions during meditation and I have deduced that it may be likely that Theory of Relativity which so perfectly describes gravity and the speed of light is in fact mathematically describing the universe as it actually is but the Standard Model which so meticulously describes quantum mechanics and particle physics perfectly describes our simulated reality that is the universe we sense . The two theories can only be conjoined, therefore, after we can mathematically remove ourselves as conscious beings , from this simulated reality which is only a construct of our consciousness.
That is a BIG QUESTION, thanks for asking it
Great questions Dr. Keating
Ehh..all respect to Kaku as a mainstream presenter of physics, ideas and cosmology..probably he should stay away from AI as a subject😀 Further I doubt Edward Witten, Penrose and the late Sagan agrees with many of his ideas..He is going wild this time😂
Hello, you say there could be a Fith force resulting from a new patrticle.
The particle you are looking for is an incredibly small negatively charged ' Monopole Particle ' called a ' Harveytron '. This particle fills every available empty space that is not an atomic nucleus, throughout the universe in a cloud. It is what makes up the ' Dark Matter '.
The negative force of repulsion that is prodeced as each particle is trying to repel each other, is the ' Dar Energy ', and is the second force of ' Gravity '. There is a simple experiment that can prove the existence. If Brian and Michio are interested, I am happy to send them a copy of latest draft of my hypothesis. Kind regards,
Tony Marsh.
Both Matter and Energy described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature. (A string is revealed to be a twisted cord when viewed up close.)
Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. An artificial Christmas tree can hold the ornaments in place, but it is not a real tree.
String Theory was not a waste of time, because Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. However, can we describe Standard Model interactions using only one extra spatial dimension? What did some of the old clockmakers use to store the energy to power the clock? Was it a string or was it a spring?
What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Fixing the Standard Model with more particles is like trying to mend a torn fishing net with small rubber balls, instead of a piece of twisted twine.
Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules:
“We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” Neils Bohr
(lecture on a theory of elementary particles given by Wolfgang Pauli in New York, c. 1957-8, in Scientific American vol. 199, no. 3, 1958)
The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with some aspects of the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose, and the work of Eric Weinstein on “Geometric Unity”, and the work of Dr. Lisa Randall on the possibility of one extra spatial dimension? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics?
When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if Quark/Gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks where the tubes are entangled? (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Charge" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry.
Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Gluons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other.
Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. If a twisted tube winds up on one end and unwinds on the other end as it moves through space, this would help explain the “spin” of normal particles, and perhaps also the “Higgs Field”. However, if the end of the twisted tube joins to the other end of the twisted tube forming a twisted torus (neutrino), would this help explain “Parity Symmetry” violation in Beta Decay? Could the conversion of twist cycles to writhe cycles through the process of supercoiling help explain “neutrino oscillations”? Spatial curvature (mass) would be conserved, but the structure could change.
=====================
Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons?
Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension?
Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons
. Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The production of the torus may help explain the “Symmetry Violation” in Beta Decay, because one end of the broken tube section is connected to the other end of the tube produced, like a snake eating its tail. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process, which is also found in DNA molecules. Could the production of multiple writhe cycles help explain the three generations of quarks and neutrinos? If the twist cycles increase, the writhe cycles would also have a tendency to increase.
Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves. ( Mass=1/Length )
The “Electric Charge” of electrons or positrons would be the result of one twist cycle being displayed at the 3D-4D surface interface of the particle. The physical entanglement of twisted tubes in quarks within protons and neutrons and mesons displays an overall external surface charge of an integer number. Because the neutrinos do not have open tube ends, (They are a twisted torus.) they have no overall electric charge.
Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms.
In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137.
1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface
137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted.
The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.)
How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter?
Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles?
I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist producing a twisted 3D/4D membrane. This topological Soliton model grew out of that simple idea. I was also trying to imagine a way to stuff the curvature of a 3 D sine wave into subatomic particles.
.
I saw the thumbnail for this video and my eyes fell out of my skull as I eye rolled so hard. The paramedics are here. It’s a scene. Thanks video editor.
thank you. sometimes it really feels like crazy town around me, your comment is an oasis of common sense.
Michio be like "loop quantum gravity is about gravity"....you don't say?! 🙄
I think it's fair to think of God as an all pervasive force, whether conscious or not. Ig we mainly argue about what it's purpose is, and what we should call it or how we should identify with it. I think of that force more like the way some readers of Lovecraft think of Azathoth, the blind ignorant god. Not that god is a moron, but that the way we think about things, and the way in which we are conscious, is entirely different from the ways in which god is semi/conscious. So perhaps the concept of cosmic and universal order, could be considered a God of some form in it of itself. I do agree with many of Kaku's thoughts. That's my current thought on it at least.
spiritual beliefs and religions can be viewed as coloring the lens through which you view reality. based on their experiences, levels of curiosity, open mindedness, personal traumas, preferences, and personal exploration, the lens will take on different forms and either narrow, widen, focus, unfocus, etc.
even being atheistic is choosing to color the lens a certain way, narrowing it to a focus on particular phenomena and to trust in certain principles, similar to religions, though relying on different sources for the chosen perspective
This show is slipping off the edge of the cliff recently
you think ? what gave it away ? the 50 years of stagnation in the field or kaku being a rambling madmen ? maybe the 50 minutes of yapping about the music of the spheres ?
From my career in Analytical Chemistry, I realized that anomalies are places where new science happens. With the impending Climate Change catastrophe looming, we need a new source of energy. This anomaly is the Nobel Prize winner “Negative Refractive Index Meta Materials” (NRIMM). This phenomenon of these Synthetic (NRIMM) material create energy by a refraction of an electromagnetic field that creates a catalyst that creates energy. To make this process shorter; this electromagnetic field is pumped into a (NRIMM) Bismuth ferrite catalyst that absorb and increase its energy as a blue-shift.
I think String Theory lacks a key ingredient. On par with what Einstein has trouble with.
A "multiverse" full of universes. Instead of an emphasis on space itself. There is a reason why momentum exists. A physical reason that may not be bound through an understand of particles alone.
There's a reason we would not be familiar with a 2d/1d space. It would be extremely detrimental to the health of particles on a whole.
Very cool Dr Keating 👍
He wrote an extremely insightful book supporting Fermi's Paradox. Importantly, it grounded me against outlandishly foolish claims concerning extraterrestrials. No Dyson spheres detected, determined not enough energy to bend space. We're alone .
So no Dyson spheres therefore no aliens?
I just wonder, how many Dyson spheres have we humans created?
Ed Witten does not even know that Kaku exists.
He is out of control, not in control.
We need physics back.
From another angle, you can buy the info from CERN, but you may not be able to buy or duplicate the physicist, team, and equipment who discovered or developed the information and the theory behind it, and the direction in which research is going, et cetera.
Correct me if I'm wrong but the spacetime dimension number limitation extrapolated by the neutron star merger to 3+1 was referring to non-compact dimension theories and not for compact dimensions within the normal spacetime?
Dodgs dont think we are dogs. Dogs think like dogs and thats why they respond to certain actions according to their behaviour..
It's sad to be in Kaku's place, he is basically the Einstein of our generation, but unable to prove his theory, because we don't have the technology yet. Einstein already reached the most reachable limit that was using light to prove his theory with a eclipse. However Michio need something way more harder, but he is definitely legit, maybe he will get his Nobel prize after death and that would be pretty sad, but we can hope we prove it before that.
Based on what?
How do we know that an alien on the other side of the Galaxy is riding the same equation? What is mathematics is based on the computation done by a particular structure or nervous system ? What if a brain made out of silicone and structure differently approaches mathematics in a different manner question mark why are we so sure that our way of processing the physical universe isn't unique? What if alien equations have a much different structure and perhaps even show different characteristics of the universe because of the sense organs and metaphysical properties of their physical forms? These are questions I would love to know the answers to even on some basic level.
Did you really type out question mark? exclamation mark
Michiu Kaku is to science what McDonald’s is to fine dining
I think universe will keep on giving us surprises. we have only just opened the door on a giant cathedral of knowledge .great guest though cheers
Michigan Kaku, the New Einstein? hahahahahaha... 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Maybe the hair.
Michio Kaku deals in unfalsifiable nonsense. The scientific method involves 1) making an observation for which you have no explanation consistent with all other observations and explanations. 2) proposing an explanation for your new observation that is falsifiable 3) testing the explanation using a test that can potentially refute your explanation, 4)... etc. etc. Michio Kaku's method is this: 1) Do some math. 2) Imagine something no one has ever observed and we have no reason to believe exists 3) Build a multi billion dollar machine to look for your imaginary thing. 4) when you don't find it, make excuses 5) build a bigger machine 6) repeat
There is a phrase that describes the worst ideas in science, which is, "Not even wrong." It refers to ideas that are so far off the mark that they would have to be much, much better in order to qualify as mistaken. In other words, incorrect ideas are still better than these ideas. Everything Michio Kaku publicly promotes, everything he is known for as a scientist is "not even wrong".
agree
Wolfgang Pauli told it how it is
Electro-Positronic Field: -ve gas binds a ball of +ve cells freed by Full Escape Energy as electron-positron pairs
Spin: particles pull gas in straight/pump out spirals at 90'. Motion increases gas intake, biasing spin at 90'
Magnetism: spin flows straight to a neighbour. Energy conservation and field balance preservation cause external circuits
Mass: gas acceleration drags cells further apart inwardly but closer laterally. +ve shells, -ve gaps, packed core
Gravity: like mass but slower acceleration with drag on field cells cancelled by dark energy so cells remain equidistant
Dark Energy: more gas near mass shrinks field, expanded by less in voids + new matter creation / black hole growth
Heavy Force: mass multiplier mechanism pulls in field before annihilating all heavy composite cored particles but protons
Heavy Fusion: in the Big Bang (and stars?) 2 positrons oppositely hit 1 electron (more than 2 electrons hit 1 positron)
Lifetime: heavy force starts when (anti) muons/taus slow from C. Electric force speed (C) and Time slow with gas density
Antimatter: 1,2 e_p pairs annihilate. 3: proton+anti proton or muon+anti muon. 4: neutron+anti neutron. 5: tau+anti tau
Positronium: e_p. Muon: ep_e. Proton: pep. Neutron: pep_e. Tau: epep_e. Neutron mass is halfway between muon and tau
Beta- Decay: pep_e => pep e. Beta+: pep + new e_p => pep_e p. Weak Force: unstable atoms form and annihilate e_p pairs
Nuclear Force: neutron electrons bond to protons. Mass and magnetism compact and strengthen the nucleus
Black Hole: atoms split into neutrons (pep_e), fused as a tau core (pepe). Time slows, centre annihilates, no singularity
Dark Matter: (anti) muons/taus last longer as the galaxy thins out? Solitary (anti) muon/tau cores? 'black hole spin'?
Photon: compressed, concentrated gas wave core pulls in field cells as it passes. Field warps diffract and interfere
2 Slit Experiment: photon/particle field warps diffract and interfere, guiding the core. Detectors interfere with guides
Entanglement: correlation broken by measurement? Physical link?
So Ai evolves up through different animal intelligence? Until it reaches primate and becomes aware and dangerous?This is absurd.x
Bro just compared one of the greatest minds humanity has ever seen to an off the wall, mid-table physics orator
I think we turned physics into a meta physics with the "space time" concepts, such as belief that space and time is a single construct instead of just how you perceive the universe based on the permeability of the energy of the space which you are travelling through and that this relative change in the perception of time is really the universal constants to be relative to that space in relation to an absolute frame of reference of the universe and time. Lorentz-Ether theory is a more conceptually valid model. The Michelson-Morley experiment was explained with the Sagnac experiment and simply dismissed because of Special Relativity but every single notable physicist agreed that Lorentz's Ether exists and I obviously also believe the quantum world is deterministic and local (Bohmian mechanics) over string theory and the mysticism of multidimensionality, relative time instead of the relative perception of time, that time is relative instead of absolute and more is wrong with the accepted models of physics.
Group think makes any comment section supportive of whatever narrative presented so I'm gonna ignore it
great work!
! Cheers! Thanks so much! *What was your favorite takeaway from this conversation?* _Please join my mailing list to get _*_FREE_*_ notes & resources from this show! Click_ 👉 briankeating.com/list
People always comment michio kaku is getting boring saying the same things over and over again, here he proved to us that he is just smart, he can speak on other topic for sure, he also think faster than any of us and his ability to communicate easily for us to understand, sure he can stop repeating some stuffs, but would non-acadamic viewers like us even understanding if he goes into details?
Great interview 👏
Thank you 🙏
The only criticism of your podcast I have Mr. Keating, is that you tend to repost interviews you did in the past as new content, and it is not quite clear when the interview has taken place. It would be helpful if you clearly labeled the dates of interviews. Other than that, I appreciate your work and please continue to bring in these most excellent guests!
Agreed