Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.

Can a Derived Median Line be a Datum? GD&T

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 13. 04. 2024
  • I discuss the effect of a derived median line straightness on a primary datum feature. Then I show the same thing with cylindricity.
    #asme #engineering #drafting #gdt
    ‪@BrianWickhamMFG‬
    ‪@asme_youtube‬

Komentáře • 28

  • @gdtguychuck
    @gdtguychuck Před 3 měsíci +1

    I like the video, Dean! It is a recurring theme in GD&T that we are made to straddle two universes. One is a realm of perfect, "basic" geometry, which is imaginary and not observable - the best we can do is to simulate it. The other is the universe that we can actually observe and in which we have real, physical parts that we can measure. The GD&T concepts typically exist in one universe or the other. Drawing views, centerlines, centermarks, basic dimensions, datums, and tolerance zones all exist in the first, basic universe. A derived median line is an observed phenomenon that we can only find (derive) once we have a real part to inspect. Like you say at the end, a derived median line isn't even straight, which is another clue that it cannot be a datum. Hey by the way, if you're going to do millimeters, don't forget to put a zero to the left of the decimal on dimensions that are less than 1!

  • @alfaradbean
    @alfaradbean Před 4 měsíci +3

    Thanks for the great explanation!

  • @timothyobrien1850
    @timothyobrien1850 Před 4 měsíci +1

    For some number of years I have passed review on other's work. Now I find myself reverse engineering and I must say looking at a blank slate is far more interesting than passing judgement.
    Your thought process is greatly appreciated.

  • @Trustachio
    @Trustachio Před 4 měsíci +3

    Greatly appreciating the metric units, even if I'm forced into imperial for my work

  • @ariel59864470
    @ariel59864470 Před 4 měsíci +1

    Thank you

  • @aniketwarake4432
    @aniketwarake4432 Před 4 měsíci +1

    Sir
    Thanks to you for using matric units

  • @nitishpande377
    @nitishpande377 Před 3 měsíci

    Hi Dean ! Thanks for all your videos so far, I've been following your CZcams channel ! Can you please make a series of videos on 1D, 2D & 3D Tolerance stack up. You've already made 1D basic stackup videos, but can you make a series ?

  • @wordsretainpower6250
    @wordsretainpower6250 Před 4 měsíci +1

    I really appreciate your channel

  • @SANJAYSHARMA-bk5jk
    @SANJAYSHARMA-bk5jk Před 4 měsíci

    Position and all orientation tolerances drives the center plane or axis and flatness, straightness , stmmetricity and concentricity gives derived medium plane or line
    But , what about curvylarity, cylindricuty ,and runouts what does they means center or derived line ?
    Or simply we cant apply these 4 to a pripary feature of size

  • @riptidecnc6697
    @riptidecnc6697 Před 3 měsíci

    You may confuse people here b/c you have applied much larger tolerances to the datum feature A than to the features tied to Datum A. If Datum A is allowed to wobble within 2 mm, you cannot have a feature using this datum at a tolerance of .05mm, things would just not work. Datum A would need to be tied down much tighter in reality....good discussion thou...

  • @sc2epyon
    @sc2epyon Před 21 dnem

    What effect does the choice of the coat line as a datum have compared to the center line?

  • @ronconovoa7566
    @ronconovoa7566 Před 4 měsíci +2

    this is way too much info it is great i hope someday i will get there

    • @RDeanOdell
      @RDeanOdell  Před 4 měsíci

      I have lots of other videos that explain the fundamentals, this one is more detailed and does assume some knowledge of GD&T.

  • @ManishGupta-gv4kk
    @ManishGupta-gv4kk Před 4 měsíci +2

    thx for using metric

  • @Martin-ef4xh
    @Martin-ef4xh Před 4 měsíci +1

    Could it be dumbed down as datum A is C/L of 30MM with cylindric of 2MM and the 60MM, max R/O of .03 to A? Or am I incorrect?

    • @asaholey
      @asaholey Před 4 měsíci +1

      The runout tolerance shoulbe be equal or larger than the cylindricity tolerance? I think yes

    • @Martin-ef4xh
      @Martin-ef4xh Před 4 měsíci

      @@asaholey Have you ever dealt with defense type engineers? "They can make the impossible happen"! LOL I've seen them put out tapped holes as datums and other times, tapped holes (again) with true position of .001. Absolutely no BS.

    • @asaholey
      @asaholey Před 4 měsíci

      @@Martin-ef4xh if they can make part without deviation

  • @PeterGustafsson-w2s
    @PeterGustafsson-w2s Před 15 dny

    Wouldn't coaxiality be the more correct way to tolerance this? than position? my understanding is that positional tolerance is more of use when you have Your datum and/or references not in line with the toleranced feature

    • @RDeanOdell
      @RDeanOdell  Před 14 dny +1

      I may not have stated in the video, but I’m using Y14.5. Position can be used for coaxiality control, usually on parts that are stationary in function.

    • @PeterGustafsson-w2s
      @PeterGustafsson-w2s Před 14 dny

      @@RDeanOdell I assume that is ASME? I'm from Europe (Sweden) so I'm measuring using ISO and had never seen it done like that before, thanks for the quick reply

  • @stillcad
    @stillcad Před 4 měsíci +1

    Collapsing cylinder ? What do you mean?

    • @RDeanOdell
      @RDeanOdell  Před 4 měsíci +1

      It’s also called the true geometric counterpart (TGC) or datum simulator. I address it in this video:
      czcams.com/video/MxvJ9aWbiY8/video.htmlsi=qq9wLSIj1JUxCE46