Patriarchies work. Matriarchies don't work, and I will explain why. Links to source materials: hagia.de/en/matriarchy/matria... www.eva.mpg.de/3chimps/files/...
Or "teach Men it's wrong to rape"...............clearly someone doesn't understand an actual rapist cares more about their intentions than whether the act in question is right or is wrong. I get the feeling some of the Women who use that cliche are a little too empathetic to monsters.
@@elijahwilson1422 that phrase is so stupid, even psychopaths know what they do are wrong, the thing is that they don't care. lets not ask what the real purpose of rape is on nature, something says that the survival of the species is more important than the desire of individuals or the super high pickyness of woman. the irony of monogamy being what defends against the savagery of our instincts. Men don't need to teach men how to treat woman, we used to do that before feminism freaked the nuclear family model. Who do you think created the family and put woman in the altair, literally ? it was man. Protection of the family was something we used to taught our sons, but that's bad because its masculinity and feminism wants weak families because they want freedom from responsibility to society. Woman were the ones that don't know how to treat anyone like adults.
Men's *FORMAL* positions of power - which in reality were precarious positions of servitude given power in order to carry out that service - were erroneously seen as positions of power only and the responsibility part was ignored. It was a prize, a trophy, for greedy, ignorant, narcissistic drones.
After my dad passed, my family changed from a patriarchy to a matriarchy over night. Things very quikly went off the rails, and while my mom tried her best, she could not protect their legacy. I reflect on what went wrong often. As man, my dad knew he was expendable. Men are raised that way. The highest honour is to die protecting your family. Family comes first. My mom was more concerned about her own feelings and happyness and eventually tore our family apart with selfish decisions. She died of cancer, and squander my dads inheritance on her own indulgences. I miss my dad, and learned that men are not as expendable as I once believed.
@@lexzenis2544 so society tells you that your dad is disposable, to be discarded like a piece of rubbish once he no longer a utility? And females choose to believe what society says rather than what your own eyes show. You liked the idea that men are expendable because women think in a zero sum game, it made you feel more valued if men weren’t. Fathers are clearly wasting their time and lives on these people.
Men are expendable (to a point) in a well functioning society. Sure it sucks if its someone important to you, but the men that remain should be picking up that slack and helping the next generation grow and thrive. Society now though has been sinking deeper and deeper into the quicksand, at some point unless it does something intelligent it will collapse into anarchy.
@@SubtleStair No. The patriarchy "hurts men" exactly whenever the feminist narrative needs it to "hurt men", while at the same time, the patriarchy keeps all men above women and gives men all the power, status and privilege in society, which of course, benefits men, but as before mentioned, simultaneously does THE OPPOSITE of benefiting men, whenever it needs to in order to support some feminist ideological claim. Think of it as wave function collapse in quantum mechanics, where the particle position remains a secret until the wave function collapses and reveals the nature of men's evil. Or like a coin toss where it's heads - women are victims, or tails - men are oppressors. Or a Three Card Monty game where there's a privileged sinful man hiding behind every card. There are many variations, but you get the idea.
@@etsequentia6765 patriarchy does hurt men because only top percent of men get benefits. A egalitarian one which all men get benefits is the one benefits men.
Growing up I was always subjected to the line "If women were in charge there would be no wars". When I got old enough to have my own opinion I would bite back with lines like "If women were in charge, the world leaders cycles would all sync up and we'd have a global conflict every 28 days or so", which as you can imagine did not go down well. Then one day I decided to research female rulers throught history and found very few were not involved in a war and just as capable of commiting atrocities. Queen Ranavalona I of Madagascar was so cruel and barbaric that she was responsible for 50-75% of of deaths of Madagascar's population. I wrote down a long list of every queen throughout history and what they were involved in, and when I heard that line again, I read it out to them and miraculously, I never heard it again....
You really need to stop living in fantasy land...you're fictional little quotes don't mean a damn thing, and you nonces keep spewing them thinking you're clever for it.
@@ragsrare3771 Only in more "recent" times. Traditional government, the Thingdom, does not allow for that. Republics, Democracies, Empires, etc. are what allows for that to happen on a large scale.
Knowledge, Responsibility, Control are intertwined. You cannot control or be responsible for that which you are unwilling to know. You cannot know or properly control that which you are unwilling to be responsible for. You cannot know or be responsible for that which you are unwilling to control. Think back to when you were learning to ride a bike, drive a car, etc. - it started out shaky, uncertain, due to a lack of knowledge or skill (control). As you learned more about what you were doing and how to do it, you knew more, you were willing to be more responsible, you were able to increase your control - until you reached a point sufficient in all 3 areas that you could reliably ride the bike, drive the car, etc. Now imagine refusing any responsibility for driving the car. One way of refusal is deciding that pedestrians were targets instead of beings to be respected. You can imagine the result. How about refusing to know? Close your eyes while driving. You have no visual input with which to drive the car. What happens? How about refusing to control. Take your hands off the steering wheel while on the highway - what would happen? Power is an enormous amount of Control. That level of control requires a high level of knowledge and responsibility to maintain GOOD control. What often happens is bad control leads to bad results, the person in control doesn't want to be responsible for bad results - and the lower the responsibility, the less control, the less they are willing to know, and you see the dwindling spiral. More bad decisions happen. Fear of consequences should they lose power comes into play, so they desperately hang on for survival. And this is the best case scenario. Is it any wonder the sane people tend to avoid power, while the corrupt criminals [who have little if anything to do with responsibility] are drawn to it, if only to have power to avoid accountability for their own crimes? Benjamin Franklin said a Republic was created in 1776. It is up to us, all of us, to keep it. We have for far too long allowed the criminals to "represent" us, and look what that has wrought.
@user-xs3sj3em6u The quote is complete bullshit. It's not just that Aristotle never said that. There was no republics, and democracies were lead exclusively by men.
@@uncbadguyAristotle was using old greek boomer language for Strong men masculine republic creates easy time easy time allowed soft people in feminine democracies which led to tyranny and we back at hard times
It seems women think, or rather feel, that being nice is more important than respecting property rights. Which is good for running a family I guess, but not for a civilization.
Communism DOES work... but only at really small scales. As in, the scale of a single nuclear family. Growing a commune any bigger than that requires exponentially greater cooperation and virtue until it becomes seemingly impossible for humans to pull off. The skills needed to run a home and run a business aren't the same. At my workplace, they waste an absurd amount of money and energy trying to make work more like a home, which on average tends to backfire.
This was a courageous post. It caught my eye because of an essay I once wrote for a history Western Civilization in college. In the 80s It only covered “ancient” civilizations, but we were taught many of them were matriarchal in nature, and left behind amazing art and literature and so on, but just “disappeared”. I wondered what happened to them so went to the library and did some research- as it turned out, they didn’t really disappear- they were overrun by patriarchal civilizations by war. Interestingly enough, the conquering civilizations over several generations became more matriarchal over time, and the cycle repeated
It was not matriarchal civilizations that were conquering, lol, they were arising side by side as a warning to the patriarchal decadence that eventually led to conquer and dissolution, this is a realm of duality. Anytime a matriarchal society arises, it is as an option to save themselves from the patriarchy running amok. You dont know history. At the beginning of civilization this whole world was matriarchal, which means not run by women of course, becayse matriarchy does not mean it is run by women, it means it is based on the fraternity and its inter-connected system connected to nature. This is why everything what this lady has shared in this video is false from the start.
@@danielchettiar5670 Evidence is there if you bothered to research. What there is no evidence for is the ludicrous insanity that matriarchy were conquering other cultures, lol, that is literally in the principles of patriarchy, colonization. This lady is a master in brainwashing gullible people who have no knowledge of historical evidences.
"If society does become a matriarchy, it's because Men would allow it to happen. All men would have to do is say 'we're stopping this social experiment' and that would be the end of it." - Spot on.
@@DaveRoberts308Are they? Where are the men's rights activists demanding equality in the selective service or male quotas for teachers? They are still being ignored and nobody is talking about the MRM because the matriarchy censors and nobody discusses ideas that they don't even know exist.
@@RandomDarter I totally disagree. As a man I understand the frustration and relationship dysfunction that drives men to want to go their own way, but MGTOW separates men from women entirely. But men need to take back society from those women, then work with those women to build families and societies. I'm not here to argue pro vs con of MGTOW; that's pointless. But I'm saying that men need to take back society, not divorce themselves from it.
1 Refuse to Take Responsibility for their Choices 2 Refuse to Be Held Accountable for their Actions 3 Gaslight Gaslight Gaslight while BLAMING anyone and everyone else around them 4 Throw someone else under the bus for their mistakes 5 NOT Learn from their Mistakes, instead insisting that they do it again
The problem is that blaming does not lead to find root causes for problems to address causes and prevent problems. Mental games do not lead to mental health. Real world does not care about beliefs or feelings. Making decisions while having feelings usually leads to bad decisions.
I don't know about that. Women tend to be a civilizing influence on men since women demand much more of their living conditions and lifestyles than men. Men are much more willing to live with less and to endure everyday hardship than women. I'd think that in a matriarchy, we'd have many more creature comforts than we do now, because that is what women tend to want that men do not.
When I was a kid loud Feminists argued stridently that if there was a female Prime Minister of Great Britain then all wars and fighting across the globe would stop. Then Margaret Thatcher was elected in England and that particular axiom disappeared from political discourse entirely.
Imagine being dumb enough not only to believe the PM's gender mattered but also to believe Britain had any relevance to influence world affairs after 1945.
Most historical examples of matriarchy were not intentional structures but rather consequences of having not developed monogamy. Monogamy and marriage were a huge leap forward in social technology.
I’m pretty sure tech would be a thing without all of that. Plus of monogamy was made by patriarchy. It was use to control women easily. How maybe monogamous in humans existed way before patriarchy existed.
Monogamy was introduced by Christianity as a means to make people stay away from the "corruptive" side of sex but only use it as a means of reproduction.@@Robohead-z6z
@@Robohead-z6zare you kidding me? Monogamy is a sacrifice for both people and if anything it controls men more. They have more desire for sex and are able to have basically indefinite amounts of kids. Women can only have so many. If anything it’s the best thing for everybody. In monogamy the man can’t leave to bang 10 other women and the woman isn’t abandoned to raise the kid alone. The man has a family though and can be involved in raising the kid (traditionally a female thing) and the women can’t just leave because of what the man provides for the family. It’s a compromise on both sides
One of my jobs over the years was a hard labor job before I developed moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. No women ever worked back there in the plant even though they could apply and very likely be hired because the place had such a high turnover rate due to the jobs back there being so grueling, even a lot of men couldn't cut it. Women worked up front in the air-conditioned office, of course. So much for equality.
Saw it happen a handful of times at a construction job myself. They come in with the tough broad mentality, then get confronted with reality before long, and either quit or get put on easier work. There's always the rare exception but men are a lot more likely to be able to tolerate hard labor in general. It's almost as if people have fallen into these gender roles in the majority of societies because it works.
Bro, try the carnivore diet fr. Using ground meat its affordable and can do wonders for autoimmune conditions.. If the carnivore diet is too hardcore at first, keto can helb too (because of anti inflammatory effects..) Greetings from switzerland!
I base it on personal experience and not on findings or studies. I grew up in two different homes. As a child youngest of 4 my mother decided she no longer wanted to be with her husband ( my dad). Till age of 12 I grew up with my mother and 2 older sisters and a brother , My life was miserable and absolutely chaotic. Then I moved in with my father till I went off to join the military. He turned me into a responsible, respectful, self sustainable, physically active athlete, and disciplined man. Meanwhile my older brother has been in and out of jail throughout his life, and my 2 sisters' lives are a mess . I owe him my life. The sadist thing is that she destroyed our family just because she claimed that my dad was too difficult to live with because he was a Vietnam veteran and that he was too serous, she wanted her life to be more carefree and fun.
My heaviest moment of disillusionment as a young angry feminist was watching the episodes of Men Vs Women Survivor type shows which can be found on CZcams. It was eye opening to see a what was essentially a sociological experiment in real time, stripped of all culture and innovations, watching male and female nature express itself in a natural setting when isolated from one another. These things stood out to me the most: 1. Men's greatest strength was the ability to form a rapid social consensus immediately and make a reasoned plan in record time, getting straight to building and tasks without much leadership as if abstract problem solving was purely instinctual. They would immediately catch and slaughter the small wild pigs on the island in order to cook and eat them, showing no guilt or conscience in order to survive. 2. Women's greatest strength was the adopting, naming and nurturing of the little wild pigs, as if they were their own children. Not a single woman would push down that maternal instinct in order to kill and a cook the pig, and any foraged food they did gather they would feed the baby pigs rather than feed themselves, as if on pure instinct. The women struggled to form any social consensus or solid plan across multiple days, going without shelter, food or fire and ending up incredibly hungry, frustrated and resentful at one another. Eventually shelter and fire was built by individual Katniss-Everdeen-type rural women who ran out of patience and 'went solo' by simply detaching from the group consensus. After watching this play out, so much of our civilization and its working components made clearer sense to me. From ideologies, to sciences, to traditional gender roles, to art, to stigmas and stereotypes. It was an 'aha' moment that has personally brought me a lot of peace. This information did not radicalise me into a rigid gender-roles traditionalist, it simply allowed me to see that Patriarchy is just a euphamism for civilisation itself. No matter how many edgy PHD's we want to write on the contrary, the creative male mind drives virtually every avenue of human endeavour on earth apart from social relations and the raising of the young, and no amount of protesting, social reform or pulling government levers will ever change this underlying nature.
I really like your phrasing of the “catniss Everdeen type of women” can you elaborate on the characteristics of those women and your thoughts towards them? For an example, are they more masculine and logical than most, being able to at least detach themselves from their maternal instincts, are they a rarity?
@@vianguyen1588 Firstly I think that every person has a breaking point for self-preservation. Even with a powerful love for all living things, any rational woman would reach a point of hunger so desperate they would take a knife to an animals throat. It's just a matter of which woman chooses to do it first. Secondly I think Men and Women both have a social strength that the other lacks that we almost never talk about. For men it is the ability to 'defer' to the other male's plans, balancing and sharing abstract concepts quickly and coming to a shared consenus without too much discussion. Those men who's ideas were not chosen don't really mind as long as they are working toward the task as a secondary servant. Women's social strength by contrast is what I call 'threat mapping'. We usually express it as 'gossip' in the culture - but gossip in a tribal context has survival relevance, as the social finer details of the rest of the tribe and its social affairs can highlight and help distinguish dangers and threats from inside and outside the tribe. Emerging from this came the male lingo about women being 'birds', chattering and twittering together as a hive. It makes logical sense that women bearing and nurturing vulnerable children close to their breast for all of living history leave them predisposed to perceive surrounding danger and are constantly gathering packets of information to build a social 'map' in order to stay ahead of threats. I know I cant prove this on paper, but I think that there is a tiny subset of both sexes on the ends of the bell curve who's psychology does do not align with the coresponding communication style, and these are typically show up as either exceptionally compassionate nurturing men, or reasoned and calcalutive individualist women who despise gossip.
@@vianguyen1588 yes they (like katniss) are rare. or majority of modern women, they just try to imitate katniss, but in the end, they are just not even 10% katniss abilities 😁😆
"Every society rests on a barbarian base. The people who don't understand civilization, and wouldn't like it if they did. The hitchhikers. The people who create nothing, and who don't appreciate what others have created for them, and who think civilization is something that just exists and that all they need to do is enjoy what they can understand of it-luxuries, a high living standard, and easy work for high pay. Responsibilities? Phooey! What do they have a government for?" ...."and now, the hitchhikers think they know more about the car than the people who designed it, so they're going to grab the controls" ...."and they have a democracy, and they are letting the enemies of democracy shelter themselves behind democratic safeguards." ― H. Beam Piper, Space Viking
Feminism appears to be more of a way to dismantle a Nation. Let me explain: It's not 'Feminists' who are the problem, as they are just naive to the words of sneaky, 'snake-oil salesman'. While both women and men can be manipulated by, 'faulty-products' shady marketing, bad philosophy, false promises etc..(bad men).. when these products and Ideas are sold, exclusively to women, there's a weak spot where 'good men', ironically, can not help. If men are best suited to be protectors of women, in any given society or nation.. This is the week spot. Foreign Adversaries want your country to fail. Tricking women into hating their men only makes the 'bad guys' happy, as our Nation suffers as a whole.
With respect to what you said about bonobos, the irony is that male sexuality has been increasingly vilified and effectively criminalized while sexual liberation was celebrated for women. So, it’s actually gotten much worse for men which is reflected in that fact that there’s now a large disparity between the number of men who are sexually active and the number of women who are, because far fewer men are having sex because the pursuit of sex by men is considered socially unacceptable or worse, while it is celebrated for women. This is one of the most harmful aspects of the current push for a matriarchy.
It really annoys me when "pro-sex" feminists cite bonobos. In bonobo culture, the females use sex to curb male aggression. If humans actually acted like bonobos, then women would see male anger and frustration as a signal to submit to them sexually. In other words, some incel screaming in rage that he can't get laid would trigger a bunch of women to have sex with him. Does this sound anything at all like how women actually act? No! Of course not!
Completely not the case. Pursuit of sex by men is very socially acceptable. Not only is a guy who gets laid envied by peers, but considered a 'true man'. Women prefer men with sexual experience. Trying to laid is just 'boys being boys'. The 'vilification' is of consent and what exactly that means... Because of the power differential previously, it didn't matter if the woman objected and now that's in question
@@ne0x1ty How absolutely delusional. Only male sexuality is vilified in this country because of false claims like the ones that you just made that result in false paradigms like what you said about consent. It’s not living in reality. The reality is that men can be accused of harassment and worse for pursuing sex, for expressing the desire, for looking like they want to, and they have to be on guard for getting in serious trouble for even thinking it, which is why they have to be surreptitious about it. The whole comment about power is nonsensical as well. This is not the 80s anymore. Men who get laid as you say, which speaks volumes about the shallow and cynical way that you view it, are not talked about that way anymore. They may be envied but it’s because other guys are wondering how they pulled that off without getting in major trouble.
@@ne0x1ty Absolutely not true but CZcams is protecting your lies because I refuted your claims but my comment is nowhere to be found. What you said is absolutely untrue and male sexuality is vilified and effectively criminalized, and no of what you said maps onto reality in the current year.
Women should have realized that in a good economic partnership with men most of them can benefit from his success more than they could achieve on their own. This is not men oppressing women. Rather it's men and women in a successful partnership oppressing their competitors of either sex. It only looks like oppression if women are determined to go it alone without partnering with men. (This only works for highly skilled, dedicated, focused women like old-time female physicians who were usually childless and often unmarried.) If they want to have children without men, this only works if the state takes over the role of husband/provider, which women in western countries have ensured that it does! In addition, since the jobs women do are not as valuable (wealth-producing) as the ones men do (as Ms Byrd points out), when women try to work for money, the wages they earn just contribute to price inflation: more money chasing the same amount of valuable goods. (That's why it takes two incomes to live nowadays. The woman's wages simply push up prices.) No one will voluntarily pay for an HR department. It and the employees there (almost all female) exist only to comply with various government regulations that act as a make-work program. Same with social work Health care employs as many people as it does because it is substantially free or subsidized, so people buy more of it than they would if they had to pay for it. Teaching is valuable only if it produces better outcomes than home-schooling could. Our parents believed it did. Who does anymore? And female-dominated teachers unions ruined it! So unless women are working in the true private sector, producing wealth in return for a wage the employer pays willingly to purchase value, women's work is mostly inflationary and therefore valueless. The idea that women should be able to go it alone and out-compete men is fundamentally a lesbian philosophy. Because lesbians *can't* countenance forming an economic partnership with men, they are driven into seeing themselves as oppressed. Same is true of heterosexual women who can't attract a man: they are doomed to bitter loneliness, the kind of soil in which Marxist philosophy germinates and thrives.
@@lesliemacmillan9932 I liked your comment. Everything you stated is correct, however, there is another dimension that is not discussed, and not allowed to be discussed (as I have found out). Western civilization is being destroyed. At a certain level in the political class the idea is that it is being destroyed to make something better. At a level of power above them, there is a somewhat more sinister motivation to restore Civilization to a state in which it serves to benefit solely those who own it (ordinary citizens being reduced to serfs). At the highest level, I think the motivation is revenge. There is evidence for my outlandish theory, however, you have to find it for yourself.
Im a man whose been a life long feminist for female economic and legal equality. Part of the reason is that I saw my Mom suffer because of her economic dependence on men. Now that I see my children growing up in a female dominated society I have had my concerns that something slipped off the rails. your brave video opened my mind to some taboo ideas. I don’t totally agree but I am willing to consider your views. i very much hope that the matriarchs at CZcams don’t cancel you. keep up the great work!
Book recommendation: _The Manipulated Man_ by Esther Vilar (1971) It's a mixed bag of ideas: some of them anti-religion; some of them a little anti-natalist; but it all boils down to the fact that this woman already believes the human condition is powered by an unseen, and unspoken of matriarchy -- and it _really_ gets under her skin to think about it, too.
I did that with my daughter and she is so much better off for it! All of her friends struggle maintaining a healthy romantic relationship with men; and she has thrived. 🌹
That's not the problem. They are intermediate to actual children and actual adults, and societies operated accordingly for all of human history. No amount of teaching can remediate the consequences of pretending otherwise.
@@lordexdj First I tried to model proper male before towards her, always treating her like a lady unless she was doing something really harmful. Second, when she did become verbally malicious and manipulative with her brother, I warned her that girls/women have an advantage with words (and therefore, emotional manipulation). But boys/men have the physical advantage and that she needs to careful. If she ruthlessly attacks her brother verbally/emotionally, he’s eventually going to be bigger than her and use his fists. She didn’t seem worried about it at the time, but she did stop being so cruel. Of course, I taught my son to restrain his physical aggression and channel his aggression into sports or worse case scenario, destroy an object and not his sister. Within a few years, her brother was bigger and much stronger than she was. But I taught them both restraint: her to be careful with her words/emotional manipulation and for him to be careful with his physicality, because he could really hurt her without even trying.
Then the cycle will repeat and become truly patriarchal again. Until we realize that both feminism and machismo are sides of the same coin we won't reach anywhere. The mistake that normies commit is thinking that feminism is a noble movement, while originally it was, it has heavily deviated and turned into a misandrist cesspit weaponized to hand life on a silver plate to women who don't put the effort at the expense of the 99% of males in the planet who can't even have their first kiss and are blamed in spite of unrealistic standards of females. It's not about women are all bad or men are all bad, humans in spite of their gender are garbage, a gender activism won't just fix that core problem. We need to understand this in order to advance......
@@DutchCobbler no, we are living in a matriarchy. Most people are just blind to what they don't want to see. They are playing ignorant because they don't want to admit what's right in front of their eyes.
@@godleveleldritchblast5257 You misunderstand my remark. I was not denying that we are in a matriarchy, I refute the idea that people have become aware of it.
Recommendations: 1) Patriarchy According to The Barbie Movie *2) Jordan Peterson Doesn't Understand Gender Discrimination* 3) Are Men Okay? - SOME MORE NEWS *4) 8. Materialism vs. Idealism: How Social Change Happens | What is Politics?* *5) 7. The Origins of Male Dominance and Hierarchy; what David Graeber and Jordan Peterson get wrong* 6) 7.1 Material Conditions: How to Eliminate Sexism 7) Invisible Women: Exposing Data Bias in a World Designed for Men by Caroline Criado-Pérez (this is a book)
People see what they want to see, unless they practice objectivity. The happiest women I've ever met were nuns..I met one happily married woman but she wasn't a housewife and her husband was rich. They had one child. There's no general definition of happiness.
I'm from Spain. In my country, when a woman marries, she keeps her surname. When she has children, they are given two surnames. The first is the father's, the second is the mother's. A person in Spain keeps their two surnames for life, hence why a married woman does not take her husband's name. There has been a trend though, of some married women adding their husbands surnames to the end of their two existing surnames. It is usually added with the use of the word "de" preceeding it. These women end up with three surnames. An example of this could be something like Maria del Mar Fernandez Alonso de Gutierrez. Too long..
@@NightinGal89 yes there is a definition of happiness , but you're probably meaning to say theres not anything in particular thatll make general human more happy, which is also nonsense. *morality of leftism vs rightism : fundemental motivation: one cannot even be sane without morality for your own sake regardless of morality . often, genes that spread are genes that help spreading or at least dont prevent spreading, genes limit potential prettiness, pateince, intelligence(empathy correlates with better), lactose intolerance etc. . most people are habitually a mindless product of their environment, the ones that arnt remind theirself of what they must prioritize regularly, like every night. ...... increasingly popular mental illness is part of the worldwide shift to more loyalty to supporting immoral corporate-government machine in the worship of games like chasing low quality social status and overdosing into desensitization in lazy lifestyle. ................habitually remind yourself that people should instead win challenges especially in terms of long term collaborative trusting relationships. then prioritize existential exploration to ward off anxiety of what you couldve done, without spending all the time on it so you can ward off anxiety of missing out on other things , especially if you havnt been making much progress in exploration. then prioritize aesthetics. winning challenges is games, not being bored overdose desensitized consumer whos become too lazy to appreciate things, improve things, etc, because hes habitually isnt required much effort per reward. .....................the people practicing and promoting the mental illness also wage war against abrahamic religions. think of your relationship with the creator of everything as a game you having to figure out what to do, so you do what seems rational based on what you were apparently made to do, which is to be happy,. this is close to what tour genetically made to do, which is spreading your genes, because genes that spread are the ones that help spreading or at least dont prevent spreading. judge yourself as if you are someone else. are your feelings functional? do you max information sharing for max likelihood of even unexpected productivity? you are not the creator of everything, you cant know so much, influence things minimaly unless you are very confident your influencing goodly vocational science of freedom how your assets are stolen from birth on youtube,odysee,rumble etc. yandex instead of google,types of linux instead of windows/mac. ................... so many people memorize quran word for word, unlike any other text.how a real muslim believes in islam, including the promise of heaven whos reward is greater than anything anyone ever has before, and hell, a punishment worse than anything else, in exchange for practicing islamic morality, a grandeur purpose of life :see book called divine speech by nouman ali khan and sharif randhawa says " The Qur' an itself refers to its unmatched beauty and power as a proof of its divine origin, challenging its detractors to produce something comparable to it, or even to a single portion of it, if they claimed it was of human design (I0:38; 11: 13; 17:88). " "The smallest chapter (Surah) in the Quran is Surah Al-Kawthar. It is the 108th chapter and consists of only three verses. " - chatgpt .,so many people memorize quran word for word, unlike any other text.how a real muslim believes in islam, including the promise of heaven whos reward is greater than anything anyone ever has before, and hell, a punishment worse than anything else, in exchange for practicing islamic morality, a grandeur purpose of life
@@NightinGal89 I mean if you take a sampling of tiktok right now you will see woman after woman after woman who drank the feminist kool aid ranting about how much their life sucks and blaming everyone except themselves. The mental gymnastics some of them go through to blame everything on men is quite frankly gold medal worthy. And the rest of the time they're huffing high grade copium. Don't see too many married women being miserable online unless they're feminists.
Yeah, because half of the human population would die. But the thing with this scenery is that they have a greater chance of surviving as a whole, compared to one with no women, because of our current biological advancements.
The women who I grew up around in the 60s and 70s were smarter funnier more resourceful and industrious and had self awareness . Humility is a sign of intelligence .
I would challenge the idea that humility is a sign of intelligence. There are a lot of intelligent people that are arrogant because of their intelligence. I would say humility is more a sign of the ability to self reflect, and an ability to set aside one's self
COVID was an excellent sign on that. There were a ton of "intelligent" experts and credentialed professionals who overnight adopted mantras, rituals and reveled in being petty tyrants.
This is a very thought provoking analysis, thank you, Erin. The reason I was recommended by CZcams to view your video is probably because I was researching into the writings of Esther Vilar which expresses similar views. I would very much appreciate your review of the book by Vilar, "The Manupulated Man" (1971). Thank you.
One thing about the current situation is that with women dominating the schools and so many fatherless homes, many younger college students have never been instructed or directed in a deep male voice with masculine delivery, and they find it threatening. Such students are liable to file unjustified grievances against their profs because it bothers them so much (this was also the opinion of one of my female department heads). Some single mothers bring their children to karate class largely so that their sons and daughters will experience male authority for a couple of hours a week.
Single parent homes really show who really matters. The crime rate of people who only grew up with a mother is several times higher than that one people who only had a father, which in turn is only marginally higher than those who had both a mother and a father.
Every single feminist needs to watch the Bear Grylls show where the women were on their own island without men and nearly died from starvation and dehydration.
No one actually believes the phrase "Sex work is work". This example. A man who is an electrician tells his landlord he cant make rent this month. The landlord tells him to pay what ever he can and tells the man if you do some electrical work at another one of my properties Ill waive the rest of the rent this month. This is an acceptable deal. No one would have a problem with that. Now same example but with a woman making OF. She tells the landlord she won't make rent this month. The landlord says if you have s*x with me Ill waive the remainder of the rent this month. Feminists would lose their minds over the 2nd situation. This would be condemned as exploitative. How could it be if "Sex work is work"? Both traded work for shelter.
It is hypocrisy that is all the world is riff with it. Much like many will support gender rights or gender equality but at the same time say gender is just a social construct not meaning man or women and I have no idea how many genders they are claiming exist now but when they mention gender rights or gender equality they mean woman's rights these people speak out both sides of their mouth with forked tongues.
Seriously. Like this is a funny joke and yet its not. Compare Toby Macguire's Spider-Man to the She-Hulk. Down-trodden and self-sacrificing versus successful and twerking. One a hero,....the other just a self-interested individual. Women,....and super-HEROES have nothing to do with each other. Marvel destroyed itself by not understanding that.
@@truthseekerodinson5094 His Spiderman lost his family, friends, job, even his powers and nearly dies (more than once) and yet, he still chose to be a hero and put others first. This is a role model. Meanwhile She hulk was all "Yeah but, I like, got wolf whistled at", and "My life is SOOOOOooooooooooo much harder than yours because of the patriarchy", while twerking in her really expensive lawyers office. She'd rather be rich and famous than do what it take to be a true hero. This is sad.
At the end of all things. We all simply expect men to step up. And that's really all there is to it. If men all disappeared, even the most devout feminist would still expect a man somewhere.... somehow.... to just appear and take care of something they need help with.
@@AnimalAlmighty Because women were complaining that they had to make the first move. You know. The entire point of the App. If I had to guess they didn't like being rejected instead of being the one doing the rejecting.
Ive seen men who hated each other, fist fight one another, then become best friends. Ive also seen women hold a grudge for decades just to stab the other woman in the back at the worst possible moment. Granted both can be said about each species. But one is more common place than the other
@@francisdashwood1760 No, that is a cope that women tell themselves. That is just another excuse women have concocted to convince themselves they aren't responsible. We have guns. We have mass telecommunication technology. If women can convince even 5% of men to obey them blindly, those men can kill anyone that resists with technology. There is nothing regular men can do. This is women's fault. And as I said in my first comment, it will not stop until society burns because people like you refuse to take responsibility for the power you have and the misuse of it. Please keep denying it though. I am going to enjoy watching women suffer the consequences of their actions.
Frigid women after they become moms? Or the women who only want hookups? Procreation and family planning is all women’s responsibility @@francisdashwood1760
My mother was born in '30 and started college at 16. My grandmother expected her to get married, but my grandfather said 'you want to go to college? See the world? go do it'. And she did. As an historian I have read a great deal of regular people stories. In the 19th century your everyday farm family had the father and son handling grain crops and maybe herd animals, maybe take the herd or grain to town. Women tended to take care of the garden, milk cow, orchard, cooking and cleaning. The work was done. No one was oppressed. Everyone did something. Who was oppressed there?
90% of the population, working people, systematically exploited by the owner class. 78 hour weeks, no breaks, no overtime, no job security, no benefits, no retirement.
Plato said that there were five types of governing systems. The worst was tyranny. The second worst was democracy. He considered democracy to be the rule of appetite rather than the rule of wisdom (rule of wisdom being the best type of governing system. To be fair, democracy in Plato's Athens was not like democracy as practiced today. He would probably say that we live in an oligarchy (rule of money). But is "rule of appetite" a bad description for what we have today?
Children of single mothers fare worse in every metric, while children of single fathers have almost the same results as children of two-parent families. Part of this difference might be genetic though, as the problematic children have problematic fathers...
@@Olivia-Whow is it harder single mothers have way more free leisurely time have all sorts of welfare and government assistance to the point being a single mom is ‘almost’ incentivized yeah ‘almost’ yeah it’s so much harder that’s totally why they get such a bad rap because it’s sooooooooo hard 😅😅😅😅
@@Olivia-W I am sure it is. Consider the people who become single parents: In a certain environment, it is almost a given to become a single mom for women. For men, no such environment exists. Single fathers are created by exceptional circumstances and a lot of times, they have a very good support network, because their environment generally does not contain a dysfunctional family background, generational unemployment and precarious living circumstances. Men who take on single fatherhood are generally capable and organized, otherwise they just wouldn't do it. For women, they are more often than not young, naive and emotionally bound by motherhood. Very different scenarios.
The Iroquois Tribe in New England was a matriarchy. They ended up getting crushed by outside tribes because they didn't see preparing for war as necessary
almost every matriarchy in history was destroyed by warring outsiders. That doesn't necessarily infer matriarchies, or peaceful societies, in themselves can't work, it merely means peaceful cultures cannot persist as long as there are warlike cultures hellbent on expansion still around them.
@@AzuraTarot even if the whole world was socially matriarchal or peaceful it wouldn't persist because some patriarchal or violent people would just take over and turn it patriarchal or violent again. Men tend to attempt to dominate, women tend to submit. It's just biology.
I think it's kind of funny that people point to all sorts of "matriarchy" throughout history.... and never ask one simple question -- what happened to them? Yeah, great, you found a dead society that didn't amount to much, and it was a matriarchy. How in the world is that supposed to support the notion that matriarchies are good things? Logically, I would think these feminists would realize that the "best" is what produced the "best" results, like Western Civilization that's given them all these amazing technologies and freedoms. Not some defunct primitive group off in some far corner of the history books. 🤣😂🤣
@@debrawehrly6900 Yes your right. It is a woman's hypergamous nature on full display. But the thing is those tall men make up a small fraction of the population with more than 80% of women fighting for those men. The thing is women shouldn't be concern with a man's height anymore. We live in a safer society where many men have never been punched in the mouth, and jobs for men in high salary jobs use a keyboard and his build isn't important towards productivity.
That's the weakness of youtube. It's calibrated to give us what we want by default, the exceptions have to be manually inputted. If people want good things, there's only so much youtube can do about that without completely self destructing.
A large spoonful of War & a pinch of Poverty is all it takes to take down a Matriarchy. The Utopia will turn into a terrifying Dystopia pretty quickly.
I just stumbled on your channel, and I love it. Intellectual discussions are something we need more of. You may have already covered this topic, but perhaps you could comment on the paper "Paradox of Declining Female Happiness." Thank you.
Excellent video. This is the first I've seen of you, now subscribed. Your note at the end, on how women can influence society without the misandrist structures recently built, is especially good.
From the American Heritage Dictionary matriarchy noun A social system in which the mother is head of the family. A family, community, or society based on this system or governed by women. The collection of women in positions of power, especially in such a social system or community. A social system in which the mother is head of household, having authority over men and children. A system of government by females. A form of social organization in which a female is the family head and title is traced through the female line. This sounds a lot like a female figure head to me. Please elaborate on the difference between matriarchy and a female figure head.
@@Dave-um7mwHi Dave. Maybe an example would help discern a bit of the nuance. Queen Elizabeth I of England, whose father was Henry VIII, managed through constant political struggle, to rule a country almost exclusively governed and controlled by the noblemen of England. So one could reasonably contend that Elizabethan England had elements of matriarchy and elements of patriarchy. The set of definitions for the word ‘patriarchy’ includes mildly conflicting notions, as is true for many words, so one typically chooses the definition appropriate to the conversation. But of course, subtle disagreements often arise, as to the specific meanings of the words being used. Sometimes these disagreements go unrecognized, causing further misunderstandings. I think Elizabethan England is an example of a society demonstrating clear elements of matriarchy (domination by a queen for decades), while simultaneously demonstrating clear elements of patriarchy (constant political and economic pressure by a society almost exclusively controlled by men (excepting the monarch in this case)). [AI large language models use probabilities when modeling the characteristics of words, which naturally allows multiple meanings of words, at the cost of some rather abstract mathematical concepts. Humans typically solve the ‘multiple conflicting definitions’ problem by attempting to recognize the nuances and categorize the discussion by clarify the definitions currently in use for the specific conversation.]
@@Dave-um7mw Consider the meaning of "figurehead": _A person given a position of nominal leadership but having no actual authority._ Do you see the difference now?
Not a book recommendation, but season 2 of "The Island, with Bear Grylls" is applicable to this topic. There was an all male tribe and all female tribe, and the women did a fantastic job of showing why no matriarchy survived the test of time. In case you don't have that sort of time, the TL/DR is that the women were facing death from dehydration and had to be saved by out-of-game intervention. Their whole experience was bad choice after bad choice, like refusal to set a leader and adopting a couple of wild piglets as pets that they should have killed and eaten.
Not only that, but after the women spent an obscene amount of time trying to start a fire, when they finally got it going the narrator said something like “in only ten hours the women achieved what it took man hundreds of thousands of years to do”. 🤭
@@Mistmantle88 Yeah, the fawning, pro-woman bias was written all over the scripting - as is true of pretty much everything these days. However, even that couldn't cover up that the recorded material proved them wholly incapable of long-term survival without outside assistance. Given a few more days unassisted, most would've been dead.
This doesn't sound like the basis for a good study. Reality TV tends to screen for personality types that will create drama and get more views of the show. Not for people that will actually succeed at the tasks that are given. Also, it's misleading to take a small number of people and portray them as a reflection of a majority of people.
@Dave-um7mw true, but then we'd have to talk about things like "how many women are even willing to do a survival challenge?" "What personality types do we estimate would function better?" "Would any women participate at all w/o a female-appealing reward structure?" And so on. So that sword definitely cuts both ways.
@@spaceranger7683 agreed. I would imagine we (or at least the producers of reality TV shows) already have the answers to these questions do to how long reality TV has been out, especially the "what personality types do we estimate would function better" question.
I have worked in two female dominated professions, and neither are any fairer or "better" than working in male dominated professions. There's a lot more back-stabbing and subterfuge, though. I appreciate the honesty of other men. I appreciate the willingness to accept mistakes and do better the next time of women.
whats with female professions, they seem to be constantly stressed and burnt out despite work itself aint that hard... is it that highschool constant "game" socially to keep up to avoid that bad side? Granted for male dominated ones any tiny sign of weakness causes same thus mistakes should not often be admitted.
I've worked with my hands my entire life. I have never been in a male dominated field (which is the only kind of work I have ever done) where mistakes have not been accepted or forgiven as long as the one who made the mistake isn't a complete mess-up and the mistake was honest and learned from. If a man *genuinely* apologizes and actually *wants* to do better and doesn't just brush it off as 'no big thing' then he'll be accepted and even taught better. Every time. Never had it any other way anywhere and I've worked in some nasty fields. It's about Merit with men. Earn your way, learn your way, do well, don't be a burden. If something comes up for a dude that tears him apart (divorce papers, girlfriend cheating, departed friend or family member), guess what! We're there for each other. It's times like *that* when we cover for each other and carry that 'dead weight', and be there for one of our brothers. Nobody else cares about us, society hates us, so we care for each other in ways women will never, ever be able to understand. You don't know. You can't know. You'll never know. The one, single time I took an office job in a female dominated field it was an utter nightmare of backstabbing, underhanded social maneuvers, fake smiles, fake friendships, dissing each other behind each others backs (and never, ever saying anything about it!), following along behind the most toxic leadership imaginable without one peep about the wrongness of what is going on, and more. It was the worst two weeks of my life. I'm convinced women aren't capable of love at this point. You don't even have friends; you have 'girls I don't hate today, but secretly envy or want to tear down'. Some of the stuff that comes out your mouths, a dude would lose teeth over.
@@SoulSoundMuisc Yup, there's a reason that imperial harems were known to be brutal bloodthirsty places. Mix the worst traits of women with actual power plays, assassinations and poisoning...
@@SoulSoundMuisc PREACH!!! "Some of the stuff that comes out your mouths, a dude would lose teeth over." Have literally witnessed this and thought the exact same thing.
Recomendations: 1) Patriarchy According to The Barbie Movie 2) Jordan Peterson Doesn't Understand Gender Discrimination 3) Are Men Okay? - SOME MORE NEWS 4) 7. The Origins of Male Dominance and Hierarchy; what David Graeber and Jordan Peterson get wrong 5) 7.1 Material Conditions: How to Eliminate Sexism 6) Invisible Women: Exposing Data Bias in a World Designed for Men by Caroline Criado-Pérez (this is a book) 7) Gravity Is A Social Construct, And That's Ok by Dr. Fatima 8) What does social construction really mean? by Jonas Čeika
This was fantastic, thank you. I learned a lot here, and I'm going to have to do some reading in order to challenge the status quo effectively. However, if that is what one must do, then it must be done. Again, well done!
I’m glad as of late I’m seeing women speaking and pushing back against the chaotic society we live in today. I pray for this channel, to accomplish their goals in stimulating minds across the U.S.A for deeper understanding.
Yes, but those women are only speaking out and "pushing back" as you call it because it benefits them. They're unable to make a go of life without the assistance of men... so they're trying to come back into the fold.
*Useful CHAMELEONS.* Women are SURVIVORS. It's their natural tendency to align with the winning side (in this case Men) to up their odds of Survival. Women are realising that Men are waking up n are refusing to Marry them. So they are changing colours ... In the coming times, you will see more n more Wom3n doing that. Notice how she said that 'I have compassion for the Women who do S3x work online' and that 'we live in an Unforgiving Society'. Both are the talking points of a Woman who has skeletons in the Closet.
That was amazing ! I loved your text. I love your presentation & your subject matter & it is so refreshing to hear this point of view from a woman. Thank you. You've given me more hope for humanity especially if your message will spread.
@@ronwatford7331 or fiance or boyfriend/girlfriend... i get what you're saying, though i'd be less concerned about that over starsigns lol Next time someone asks me my sign, i'll just make something up, and watch their mental gymnastics.
@@ronwatford7331women want partners because bringing home a paycheck is nothing compared to all the 24 hr responsibilities wives have. And those things can’t be put off till later like mowing the lawn.
50/50 is a lie. I hate to seem like an ahole, but I'm tired of having this conversation. Every man must emancipate himself, because men are more incredulous than women. I have neither the time nor the patience
@@kc6810 Women never spoke way about men until the 1990s when Hollywood & the Marxist-controlled Media pumped out hundreds of shows/movies of Fathers being bumbling dopes and Wives/Mothers as "Superwomen". There is no way before then that women spoke that way of men, men who literally built civilization around the world.
@@kc6810 used to? they still today , in fact it's far worse. As the ego's and superiority complex of modern women get worse do to their feminist indoctrination and how relationships are carried out on TV. or the movies plus Disney, you can expect more nasty things to happen. I doubt women even said anything along the lines of men being children, if they did they kept it to themselves back in the day , at least post WW2 Keep i mind those privileges less women who had no advantage had the power over a government ruled by men to pass prohibition. Outlawing alcohol and making many peoples lives difficult ( most likely they wanted to keep their men at home so they can dominate them without other men around them to tell them what their wives were actually doing) and they created organized crime like the mafia that reeked hell on others up to modern times. Good job ladies! and the real kicker is they didn't have the vote back then.
Every time I've seen only women working together, whether it's my time working in a department store that was 99% women, during group project work, or on TV with the apprentice and survival shows, it always falls apart almost right from the start. The fundamental problem seems to be a desire to avoid leadership, with the responsibilities of telling others what to do and risks that comes from the role, when some of those people being led inevitably get frustrated and talk bad about the leader or organise opposition to take them down. By pretending everyone is equal and there is no threat of punishment, nobody does the hard nasty work by choice. Taking offense is used as a weapon of offense and defence, which can spiral into huge drama sessions where every action and reaction are documented and regurgitated as reasoning for someone being a "bad" person. The desire to be the "good" woman to win in the eyes of the majority means never allying themselves with those who risk being called "bad" people, whilst men are far likelier to risk slander and defamation if it means standing by their principles. The loudest voices seem to intimidate other women into following them as they refuse to confront hostile forces, rather preferring to hide safely in the majority, instead of standing up for the proven smart successful voices. Eventually the disfunction becomes so bad, the silent majority either walks away for the group to collapse, or latches onto the few men or masculine women they have for guidance.
@@supremereader7614 It's algorithmic demotion, can't have an intelligent, attractive, curious and non-combative woman talk about such things, lest it rob the message of its narrative sway.
I read Rachel Wilson’s book not long ago and was stunned at how often these women were privately benefiting from men, especially elite men, while at the same time publicly claiming to hate men. One incident that I saw in a documentary a while ago was the ‘Torches of Freedom’ of 1929. Edward Bernays, known as the Father of Public Relations and also a nephew to Sigmund Freud, wanted to increase sales of cigarette companies by breaking down the social taboo of women smoking. He enlisted the help of psychoanalyst A. A. Brill (an American associate of Freud) and 1st-Wave Feminist writer Ruth Hale and thus the ‘Torches of Freedom’ movement was born, encouraging women to declare their freedom from men by smoking cigarettes. Incidentally, the ‘Revolutionary Women’ who marched in the 1929 New York Easter Day Parade while smoking were getting paid to do so by Bernays. Furthermore, Dr. Brill made a public statement that cigarette smoking was natural for women due to their, “oral fixation.” Getting paid by one man in the early fields of marketing and PR while getting insulted by another man in the early psychological establishment; how liberating!
Woah woah woah there, let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater, shall we? the guy might just have a point there about women's... um... oral fixation.
If true, the Frisian matriarchy outlined in the Oera Linda Book (available online) is an example of an ancient working Matriarchy. The FolkMother was basically the Moral Centre of society, she was the the final arbiter of Frisian law (Tex). Her role was a link to Freya, the mother goddess, though Wralda was God. She was surrounded by Kings who ran society, but they were subservient to the FolkMother. She was responsible for her societies wellbeing. Her role was mainly teaching, through training young women who had chosen a life of celibacy, and becoming teachers themselves. Few women were cut out for this role, and most opted for a family life, after their apprenticeship. Problems arose when the FolkMother failed to name a successor, and famously Kelta wished to have the role but was forced out to build a society at Karnac. It would be interesting to hear your perspective on this society. It obviously failed for a reason - the light was extinguished, but if true it must have existed for thousands of years.
The Frisian's ended up failing as a society around 4-5th century as a change in the climate from warmer temperatures to colder ones essentially invalidated their way of life, along with the invasions of Saxon peoples. They dug ditches and trenches to help irrigate the land for farming in the marshlands of what is now the Netherlands. Reduced farming capacity leads to the inability to fight off foreign powers as you do not have capability to wage extended war. Frisian society was eventually subsumed in the greater Christian sphere of influence a few centuries before Charlemagne (specifically by the Franks). They also explicitly worshipped the Nordic gods like Odin and Thor as the heads of the pantheon. The earliest reliable records of this society is from the Roman historian Drusus in the 1st century BC. Then during the 7-8th centuries they were ruled over by a high king. The folk mother was more likely a position held within a sub section of greater Frisian society, it was merely a function of said culture and not a specific Matriarchy. The Oera Linda is a collection of Frisian Mythology and occultism not an actual history. It has gone under much scrutiny because of its anachronistic nature, making it very difficult for historians to verify much of what it contains with any other contemporary sources. This has led many scholars in Germanic circles to believe the book itself is a hoax in and of itself.
I am so glad someone else finally understands the meaning behind the GoT ending! It was definitely a distinction between power and duty with Jon Snow being about duty versus unbridled power and Daenerys falling into power to suit her whims. Too many people caught up in the ID politics to see the true story, in fact rebelling against the narrative because it went against a corrupted world view.
@@docbohemian1328they were given pigs and none of them had the balls to do what was necessary to survive. They couldn't seperate themselves from their feelings and "nurturing" nature. Those pigs ate better than all the women did.
Value cannot be upheld when there is no reward system in place in maintaining and preserving those values. Values must be rewarded and reinforced. If you create a world where values still leave young men unemployed and underemployed, sooner or later, those young men are going to REJECT those values. Conservatives often talk about values like religion and magic, as though they are not ABSTRACTION. They are abstractions and they will remain abstractions unless they are connected to actually making it in the world with real economic opportunities. Once drug dealers, and FansOnly surpassed working men, and the opportunities for working men went out the window - anyone who believes they can preserve VALUES while these men are broke is foolish. Values have to have a tangible benefit that can actually be MEASURED. If that is not the case then EXPECT for your values to be tossed into the trash heap.
SWP, nice seeing you here! Great points, I gotta reiterate: Women don't build, they nest! Meaning, a matriarchy can only exist after the indoor plumbing and air-conditioned are installed into office buildings, OR with a complete lack of infrastructure. Ladies aren't incentivized, via nature or nurture, to achieve great feats. They wait at the finish line to marry the best bridge engineer or wait for the when environment is safe enough to go out on their own. They simply won't take the risk to go out and make society safer and cleaner.
@@kingmelanin7468 Agreed, moreover you can witness this mentality baked into them on the most fundamental instinctual level in ANY serious public conflict or confrontation. I mean there must be thousands of videos online where you can witness this, something happens (maybe a fight or accident) in the street, anything which is threatening to those around, in most cases men will turn and go towards the conflict to try and help, while the women immediately run away to protect themselves.
The level of anger and resentment is ridiculously high because men are unable to have a long-term partner and children that motivate them to go out and hunt aggressively for a kill. I've read that an excess of unmarried men results in gang rape culture. There's more violence. I'm not sure how it goes in western countries because China and similar countries to it have neets or hikkikomori that are simply tapping out without a fight. Countries in the middle east, India, and Africa end up with the gang rape and a thirst for violence. I guess the US has quite a bit of neets nowadays, like 30% of gen z for example. We'll see what happens.
Values are ideology. Interests drive action. You do what You want - and pay the price. From experience grows a wisdom that is aligned to reality. As reality is more profound then what is tangible, so interests can shift.
The manipulated men by Esther Vilar is pretty popular book nowadays. I really liked your video, thank you for for sharing, it was really informative. I learned a lot. So good to see women who can find her better strengths. I imagine a world where women like you build a better society side by side with men, leveraging each others strength instead of arguing who is stronger and better, and exploiting each other. What would that be called?
Thanks for this eye-opening video. I'm a black man who is very concerned about the future of our country. I'm glad to see more women calling out the hypocrisy of feminism/the Matriarchy. This push to create a matriarchy was created by antiwhite oligarchs who seek to destroy Western civilization. Feminism, which is a subset of antiwhiteism, has white erased the norms and rules which make up Western Civilization. As you said, matriarchies cannot work without the participation of both men and women. In order to restore civility to Western civilization, the victimization of whites (Westernkind) must stop. A couple of books that you should check to further understand what I'm referring to is Go Free and Born Guilty. The author, Jason Kuhne goes into great detail explaining the current state of Western Civilization and how to reclaim it from further decline due to antiwhiteism.
Thank you sir, I've only seen a few dozen black men calling out antiwhiteism but it feels good to know we can recognize unfair treatment even when it's not occurring to us directly, we shouldn't artificially put down ANYONE, we need to forge the future the 20th century wanted which is color blind not color coded
No one is trying to establish a matriarchy, like you said a matriarchy would need the participation of both men and women, so does every other system. What is being sought is a more equal and just society where anyone can pursue their goals without societal hurdles like gender, race, religion etc. There is no antiwhiteism in an equal and just society
@@davianoinglesias5030 then pie society is not equal and just By every metric everything you said is false Nobody is striving for equality, they are striving for equity which is inherently unequal They are socially engineering a new culture where everything is flipped simply because we can, and white men are on the bottom of the social ladder They admit and cheer on such a fate so don't even lie to me with your cope and 2013 reddit tier naivety I can't really find anyone who truly behaves in a way that will bring about a truly free and color blinded equal future
@@davianoinglesias5030 It's all about white erasure. The society, which was created by Westernkind(the white race) creates a set of mores and values which make up Western Civilization. Those mores and values are being white erased by antiwhiteism. A more equal and just society is nothing more than another version of DEI. And DEI is antiwhiteism in its purest form.
@@davianoinglesias5030 An equal and just society is exactly what antiwhiteism represents. You're talking about a more equal and just society and that reminds me of DEI. Look where our society is right now because of DEI. We have people who are NOT qualified to do certain jobs, but because of DEI initiatives, white males are overlooked and not being hired in this antiwhite society. The trans agenda is being pushed so that men can compete in women's sports. In the end, the only way to restore our society to its former glory is to make antiwhiteism a thing of the past.
This video made me emotional. Thank you for expressing the truth in a scientific manner. It's much harder to refute that way. On my mother's side I am a member of the Cherokee Nation, one of the Iroquois matriarchal tribes you discussed. That system hasn't really been practiced since the removal, but before then it worked like this: Property was passed down through the woman, sort of like a dowry. Clan affiliation was also given through the woman and men were not allowed to marry a woman from their same clan. Women had an equal voice to men, but their voice had no more weight than anyone else's (thus equal). That was about the extent of it. It worked for my ancestors, but resembled something much closer to an egalitarian society than a pure matriarchy. Feminism has robbed both men and women of their true natures, and ability to thrive. There are some lovely similarities between men and women. We are from the same species, afterall. But there is so much more beauty in our differences. When we are living in the correct roles, we come to compliment each other and fill in gaps that the other has. It is healing to live that way. I hope one day soon we can all get to experience that.
You're right when you say men and women have a lot of similarities. There's two arguments that just irk me to no end on the red pill side of things. 1: is the notion that women are unable to think logically and rationally. Them saying that men are more logical and women are more emotional. However when you do a little thinking on that, you realize women can be just as calculated and logical as an algorithm, and men can be as chaotic as the weather. And when you state this, those who generalize the genders can't explain how that generalization actually applies. 2. Is how the genders par bond. Both men and women release oxytocin during sex or any skin on skin contact. You have those in the red pill guru's that think men can have multiple "one night stands" and suffer no consequences from it. While ignoring that both men and women learn what the live, by living it. I'm not sure if you train your brain to not release oxytocin during the act, or if you train yourself to easily break that bond that is formed. I do however see the risks involved in having more than one partner.
@@schmalzilla1985 Oh, I absolutely agree! I can appreciate what Red Pill is trying to do, though I disagree with it on a factual basis. It feels like a movement for men to try to "reclaim" some semblance of what they lost when they gave into pure feminism. I say reclaim in quotes because it is revisionist history at best and completely ignores the very things you mentioned. It isn't a natural way of living for any of us, and comes off as some sort of revenge against women. Just like we see men do under feminism, where they give up what they want because they need to mate - the same is true with the red pill and women. It's harmful and dishonest.
@@schmalzilla1985 I wholeheartedly agree with you! I can appreciate what the Red Pill movement is trying to do, but what they largely promote is a strange mix of revisionist history and pseudoscience. It isn't a return to anything from the past, and sort of feels like some attempt at revenge for the feminization of our culture. I long for a day when we can just accept each other and get on with living.
The feminine wants to care for babies. The masculine wants babies to grow up strong and independent. The feminine doesn’t let go and would have all people be babies to be perpetually coddled. The masculine wants them to move out, get a job, and start their own family.
So many women say "men need to teach men how to treat women." But they don't let their children have a male role model
Or "teach Men it's wrong to rape"...............clearly someone doesn't understand an actual rapist cares more about their intentions than whether the act in question is right or is wrong. I get the feeling some of the Women who use that cliche are a little too empathetic to monsters.
Facts
@@elijahwilson1422 that phrase is so stupid, even psychopaths know what they do are wrong, the thing is that they don't care.
lets not ask what the real purpose of rape is on nature, something says that the survival of the species is more important than the desire of individuals or the super high pickyness of woman.
the irony of monogamy being what defends against the savagery of our instincts.
Men don't need to teach men how to treat woman, we used to do that before feminism freaked the nuclear family model. Who do you think created the family and put woman in the altair, literally ? it was man. Protection of the family was something we used to taught our sons, but that's bad because its masculinity and feminism wants weak families because they want freedom from responsibility to society.
Woman were the ones that don't know how to treat anyone like adults.
A lot of men in the West are missing that male role model. They simply stand less of a chance in this world.
because they say that, but sexualy desire men who don't
Matriarchies put women into positions of power but not so much into positions of responsibility.
🙌 🏅
Men's *FORMAL* positions of power - which in reality were precarious positions of servitude given power in order to carry out that service - were erroneously seen as positions of power only and the responsibility part was ignored. It was a prize, a trophy, for greedy, ignorant, narcissistic drones.
That is not Matriarchy - that is Gynocentrism!
An exception to this is the Philippines. It is very matriarchal (at the familial level), but first-born daughters bear most of the responsibility.
Name a female president
After my dad passed, my family changed from a patriarchy to a matriarchy over night. Things very quikly went off the rails, and while my mom tried her best, she could not protect their legacy. I reflect on what went wrong often. As man, my dad knew he was expendable. Men are raised that way. The highest honour is to die protecting your family. Family comes first. My mom was more concerned about her own feelings and happyness and eventually tore our family apart with selfish decisions. She died of cancer, and squander my dads inheritance on her own indulgences. I miss my dad, and learned that men are not as expendable as I once believed.
What ever made you feel men were expendable?
@@fronttowardenemy9994 that would be the social construct outside the home.
@@lexzenis2544 so society tells you that your dad is disposable, to be discarded like a piece of rubbish once he no longer a utility? And females choose to believe what society says rather than what your own eyes show. You liked the idea that men are expendable because women think in a zero sum game, it made you feel more valued if men weren’t. Fathers are clearly wasting their time and lives on these people.
@@lexzenis2544 then society is clearly not worthy of men’s sacrifices. Point noted.
Men are expendable (to a point) in a well functioning society. Sure it sucks if its someone important to you, but the men that remain should be picking up that slack and helping the next generation grow and thrive. Society now though has been sinking deeper and deeper into the quicksand, at some point unless it does something intelligent it will collapse into anarchy.
It’s so refreshing to hear a very intelligent woman talk about an arguably difficult subject for most women to discuss.
I’ve been bullied by other women and consequently, a matriarchy sounds like hell on earth to me.
Same here
MORE heirachal than EVER BEFOOORRREEEE. 😂
In the same way that patriarchy hurts men? In the exact same way? 🤔
@@SubtleStair No. The patriarchy "hurts men" exactly whenever the feminist narrative needs it to "hurt men", while at the same time, the patriarchy keeps all men above women and gives men all the power, status and privilege in society, which of course, benefits men, but as before mentioned, simultaneously does THE OPPOSITE of benefiting men, whenever it needs to in order to support some feminist ideological claim.
Think of it as wave function collapse in quantum mechanics, where the particle position remains a secret until the wave function collapses and reveals the nature of men's evil. Or like a coin toss where it's heads - women are victims, or tails - men are oppressors. Or a Three Card Monty game where there's a privileged sinful man hiding behind every card. There are many variations, but you get the idea.
@@etsequentia6765 patriarchy does hurt men because only top percent of men get benefits. A egalitarian one which all men get benefits is the one benefits men.
Matriarchies fail because future success requires sacrifice.
Facts, and they want someone else to sacrifice for matriarchy, mainly men and we're not falling for it.
Lol. Yeah. And other things… accountably… etc.
No matriarchies fail because, as was pointed out in the video, only men can be the enforcement arm.
And if you can just get what you want at any time by opening your legs for a man, why would you ever sacrifice?
@@hansgullickson4080
Literacy...
Growing up I was always subjected to the line "If women were in charge there would be no wars". When I got old enough to have my own opinion I would bite back with lines like "If women were in charge, the world leaders cycles would all sync up and we'd have a global conflict every 28 days or so", which as you can imagine did not go down well. Then one day I decided to research female rulers throught history and found very few were not involved in a war and just as capable of commiting atrocities. Queen Ranavalona I of Madagascar was so cruel and barbaric that she was responsible for 50-75% of of deaths of Madagascar's population. I wrote down a long list of every queen throughout history and what they were involved in, and when I heard that line again, I read it out to them and miraculously, I never heard it again....
Guess I need to do more research. Good job 👍
Love it
Stupid claims by stupid people being corrected
I would very much like you to give us that list for science.
I want the list too. I'm in education. This list can impact greatly.
Victoria was also not nice, Elisabeth 1, also not. And the "queen if seven heavens" (Maya) also...
Modern people in power have forgotten that with great power comes great responsibility.
They forgot me
Spiderman really is the best hero.
You really need to stop living in fantasy land...you're fictional little quotes don't mean a damn thing, and you nonces keep spewing them thinking you're clever for it.
Power without responsibility is an unmitigated disaster.
"Handouts without responsibility destroy human dignity" ~Former senator Bob Dole
Most men through it history did that
@@ragsrare3771 Only in more "recent" times. Traditional government, the Thingdom, does not allow for that. Republics, Democracies, Empires, etc. are what allows for that to happen on a large scale.
@@wegfarir1963 Whole history is full with male rulers who are never held responsible. Not only recent.
Knowledge, Responsibility, Control are intertwined.
You cannot control or be responsible for that which you are unwilling to know.
You cannot know or properly control that which you are unwilling to be responsible for.
You cannot know or be responsible for that which you are unwilling to control.
Think back to when you were learning to ride a bike, drive a car, etc. - it started out shaky, uncertain, due to a lack of knowledge or skill (control). As you learned more about what you were doing and how to do it, you knew more, you were willing to be more responsible, you were able to increase your control - until you reached a point sufficient in all 3 areas that you could reliably ride the bike, drive the car, etc.
Now imagine refusing any responsibility for driving the car. One way of refusal is deciding that pedestrians were targets instead of beings to be respected. You can imagine the result. How about refusing to know? Close your eyes while driving. You have no visual input with which to drive the car. What happens? How about refusing to control. Take your hands off the steering wheel while on the highway - what would happen?
Power is an enormous amount of Control. That level of control requires a high level of knowledge and responsibility to maintain GOOD control. What often happens is bad control leads to bad results, the person in control doesn't want to be responsible for bad results - and the lower the responsibility, the less control, the less they are willing to know, and you see the dwindling spiral. More bad decisions happen. Fear of consequences should they lose power comes into play, so they desperately hang on for survival.
And this is the best case scenario. Is it any wonder the sane people tend to avoid power, while the corrupt criminals [who have little if anything to do with responsibility] are drawn to it, if only to have power to avoid accountability for their own crimes?
Benjamin Franklin said a Republic was created in 1776. It is up to us, all of us, to keep it. We have for far too long allowed the criminals to "represent" us, and look what that has wrought.
"Masculine republics give way to feminine democracies, and feminine democracies give way to tyranny." - Aristotle
This is not a "new" phenomenon.
@user-xs3sj3em6u
The quote is complete bullshit. It's not just that Aristotle never said that. There was no republics, and democracies were lead exclusively by men.
@@mmestari You're complete bullshit, numerous sources attribute that to Aristotle, altho it's possible that Plato said it as well.
@@uncbadguyAristotle was using old greek boomer language for
Strong men masculine republic creates easy time easy time allowed soft people in feminine democracies which led to tyranny and we back at hard times
Which give way to collapse, more tyranny or a new republic.
It seems women think, or rather feel, that being nice is more important than respecting property rights. Which is good for running a family I guess, but not for a civilization.
Most are only nice or “agreeable” towards the popular and dominant forces in society
Communism DOES work... but only at really small scales. As in, the scale of a single nuclear family. Growing a commune any bigger than that requires exponentially greater cooperation and virtue until it becomes seemingly impossible for humans to pull off.
The skills needed to run a home and run a business aren't the same. At my workplace, they waste an absurd amount of money and energy trying to make work more like a home, which on average tends to backfire.
This was a courageous post. It caught my eye because of an essay I once wrote for a history Western Civilization in college. In the 80s
It only covered “ancient” civilizations, but we were taught many of them were matriarchal in nature, and left behind amazing art and literature and so on, but just “disappeared”. I wondered what happened to them so went to the library and did some research- as it turned out, they didn’t really disappear- they were overrun by patriarchal civilizations by war.
Interestingly enough, the conquering civilizations over several generations became more matriarchal over time, and the cycle repeated
@@southpaw7426 Wow, you're right. It is a cycle
It was not matriarchal civilizations that were conquering, lol, they were arising side by side as a warning to the patriarchal decadence that eventually led to conquer and dissolution, this is a realm of duality. Anytime a matriarchal society arises, it is as an option to save themselves from the patriarchy running amok. You dont know history. At the beginning of civilization this whole world was matriarchal, which means not run by women of course, becayse matriarchy does not mean it is run by women, it means it is based on the fraternity and its inter-connected system connected to nature. This is why everything what this lady has shared in this video is false from the start.
As a Greek person, let me educate you. Μητέρα is the word for mother. Αρχή is power/authority. So peddle your literal falsehoods elsewhere.
@@Shalanayabunch of claims with absolutely no evidence, but feelings ig
@@danielchettiar5670 Evidence is there if you bothered to research. What there is no evidence for is the ludicrous insanity that matriarchy were conquering other cultures, lol, that is literally in the principles of patriarchy, colonization. This lady is a master in brainwashing gullible people who have no knowledge of historical evidences.
Let the feminist build their matriarchy while we are chilling in the woods with the bears.
Cool. I’m going to Thailand a bang pros
They make great gym bros
czcams.com/video/GBY2xsu2Juk/video.htmlsi=Pi5Hb76QJRke-3Dn
@@hansgullickson4080lady boys
They’ll get other men to hunt you and put you to work.
Bearmaxxing 🐻 😎
"If society does become a matriarchy, it's because Men would allow it to happen. All men would have to do is say 'we're stopping this social experiment' and that would be the end of it." - Spot on.
Sadly the men of today cannot say NO to a woman.
Indeed, I see signs that men are starting to wake up.
@@DaveRoberts308Are they? Where are the men's rights activists demanding equality in the selective service or male quotas for teachers? They are still being ignored and nobody is talking about the MRM because the matriarchy censors and nobody discusses ideas that they don't even know exist.
MGTOW is on it
@@RandomDarter I totally disagree. As a man I understand the frustration and relationship dysfunction that drives men to want to go their own way, but MGTOW separates men from women entirely. But men need to take back society from those women, then work with those women to build families and societies.
I'm not here to argue pro vs con of MGTOW; that's pointless. But I'm saying that men need to take back society, not divorce themselves from it.
1 Refuse to Take Responsibility for their Choices
2 Refuse to Be Held Accountable for their Actions
3 Gaslight Gaslight Gaslight while BLAMING anyone and everyone else around them
4 Throw someone else under the bus for their mistakes
5 NOT Learn from their Mistakes, instead insisting that they do it again
The problem is that blaming does not lead to find root causes for problems to address causes and prevent problems.
Mental games do not lead to mental health.
Real world does not care about beliefs or feelings. Making decisions while having feelings usually leads to bad decisions.
Who will climb down waist deep in human waste to clean out the sanitary products they insist the didn’t flush? 😂
😂😂😂
The male slaves
If women were in charge, we'd still be living in grass huts - Camille Paglia
Well she’s wrong cuz what’d happen is an opposing force like China would quickly take over.
Yes, but we’d have nice cushions 😄
@@drstrangelove4998 😜
@@drstrangelove4998 So many that it would be impossible to sit on the couch...
I don't know about that. Women tend to be a civilizing influence on men since women demand much more of their living conditions and lifestyles than men. Men are much more willing to live with less and to endure everyday hardship than women.
I'd think that in a matriarchy, we'd have many more creature comforts than we do now, because that is what women tend to want that men do not.
When I was a kid loud Feminists argued stridently that if there was a female Prime Minister of Great Britain then all wars and fighting across the globe would stop. Then Margaret Thatcher was elected in England and that particular axiom disappeared from political discourse entirely.
Imagine being dumb enough not only to believe the PM's gender mattered but also to believe Britain had any relevance to influence world affairs after 1945.
And the feminists hated thatcher because she was traditional in most of her values
@@theverystones2643😂
@@theverystones2643 So true, a most valuable lesson for radical feminists.
They should be happy. See, women suck as rulers just as badly as men! Equality!
Most historical examples of matriarchy were not intentional structures but rather consequences of having not developed monogamy. Monogamy and marriage were a huge leap forward in social technology.
Matriarchal societies do have monogamous marriages.
I’m pretty sure tech would be a thing without all of that. Plus of monogamy was made by patriarchy. It was use to control women easily. How maybe monogamous in humans existed way before patriarchy existed.
Monogamy was introduced by Christianity as a means to make people stay away from the "corruptive" side of sex but only use it as a means of reproduction.@@Robohead-z6z
@@Robohead-z6z 😂😂😂 wtf?
@@Robohead-z6zare you kidding me? Monogamy is a sacrifice for both people and if anything it controls men more. They have more desire for sex and are able to have basically indefinite amounts of kids. Women can only have so many. If anything it’s the best thing for everybody. In monogamy the man can’t leave to bang 10 other women and the woman isn’t abandoned to raise the kid alone. The man has a family though and can be involved in raising the kid (traditionally a female thing) and the women can’t just leave because of what the man provides for the family. It’s a compromise on both sides
One of my jobs over the years was a hard labor job before I developed moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. No women ever worked back there in the plant even though they could apply and very likely be hired because the place had such a high turnover rate due to the jobs back there being so grueling, even a lot of men couldn't cut it. Women worked up front in the air-conditioned office, of course. So much for equality.
Saw it happen a handful of times at a construction job myself. They come in with the tough broad mentality, then get confronted with reality before long, and either quit or get put on easier work. There's always the rare exception but men are a lot more likely to be able to tolerate hard labor in general. It's almost as if people have fallen into these gender roles in the majority of societies because it works.
Bro, try the carnivore diet fr. Using ground meat its affordable and can do wonders for autoimmune conditions..
If the carnivore diet is too hardcore at first, keto can helb too (because of anti inflammatory effects..)
Greetings from switzerland!
@@darthmais1375 thanks for the info, I'll check it out. Arthritis is a bad deal.
Even when women work in manual labour they arent doing the same thing
A world without men: Lights out, water off, sewer backing up. Chaos. Watch any apocalypse movie.
And empty store shelves because there aren't enough women trained to drive trucks and trains, or fix them. Most would be dead in less than a year.
👍
i start to imagine that
A world? More like a week.
Just watch beR grylls survival island the women practically started starving and would most likly died without the mens help
poverty always restores the natural state of things
this.
God save the earth from women.
Talk about your grave yard cheer leader. Are you bragging or complaining?
NOPE! It just reminds us why we modified human nature in the first place.
@@hoottasshell The way you used so few words to show that many malfunctions in your brain is downright impressive.
Nobody abuses power more than someone whose never had it.
I base it on personal experience and not on findings or studies. I grew up in two different homes.
As a child youngest of 4 my mother decided she no longer wanted to be with her husband ( my dad). Till age of 12 I grew up with my mother and 2 older sisters and a brother , My life was miserable and absolutely chaotic. Then I moved in with my father till I went off to join the military. He turned me into a responsible, respectful, self sustainable, physically active athlete, and disciplined man.
Meanwhile my older brother has been in and out of jail throughout his life, and my 2 sisters' lives are a mess .
I owe him my life.
The sadist thing is that she destroyed our family just because she claimed that my dad was too difficult to live with because he was a Vietnam veteran and that he was too serous, she wanted her life to be more carefree and fun.
My heaviest moment of disillusionment as a young angry feminist was watching the episodes of Men Vs Women Survivor type shows which can be found on CZcams. It was eye opening to see a what was essentially a sociological experiment in real time, stripped of all culture and innovations, watching male and female nature express itself in a natural setting when isolated from one another. These things stood out to me the most:
1. Men's greatest strength was the ability to form a rapid social consensus immediately and make a reasoned plan in record time, getting straight to building and tasks without much leadership as if abstract problem solving was purely instinctual. They would immediately catch and slaughter the small wild pigs on the island in order to cook and eat them, showing no guilt or conscience in order to survive.
2. Women's greatest strength was the adopting, naming and nurturing of the little wild pigs, as if they were their own children. Not a single woman would push down that maternal instinct in order to kill and a cook the pig, and any foraged food they did gather they would feed the baby pigs rather than feed themselves, as if on pure instinct. The women struggled to form any social consensus or solid plan across multiple days, going without shelter, food or fire and ending up incredibly hungry, frustrated and resentful at one another. Eventually shelter and fire was built by individual Katniss-Everdeen-type rural women who ran out of patience and 'went solo' by simply detaching from the group consensus.
After watching this play out, so much of our civilization and its working components made clearer sense to me. From ideologies, to sciences, to traditional gender roles, to art, to stigmas and stereotypes. It was an 'aha' moment that has personally brought me a lot of peace. This information did not radicalise me into a rigid gender-roles traditionalist, it simply allowed me to see that Patriarchy is just a euphamism for civilisation itself. No matter how many edgy PHD's we want to write on the contrary, the creative male mind drives virtually every avenue of human endeavour on earth apart from social relations and the raising of the young, and no amount of protesting, social reform or pulling government levers will ever change this underlying nature.
I really like your phrasing of the “catniss Everdeen type of women” can you elaborate on the characteristics of those women and your thoughts towards them? For an example, are they more masculine and logical than most, being able to at least detach themselves from their maternal instincts, are they a rarity?
@@vianguyen1588
Firstly I think that every person has a breaking point for self-preservation. Even with a powerful love for all living things, any rational woman would reach a point of hunger so desperate they would take a knife to an animals throat. It's just a matter of which woman chooses to do it first.
Secondly I think Men and Women both have a social strength that the other lacks that we almost never talk about. For men it is the ability to 'defer' to the other male's plans, balancing and sharing abstract concepts quickly and coming to a shared consenus without too much discussion. Those men who's ideas were not chosen don't really mind as long as they are working toward the task as a secondary servant.
Women's social strength by contrast is what I call 'threat mapping'. We usually express it as 'gossip' in the culture - but gossip in a tribal context has survival relevance, as the social finer details of the rest of the tribe and its social affairs can highlight and help distinguish dangers and threats from inside and outside the tribe. Emerging from this came the male lingo about women being 'birds', chattering and twittering together as a hive. It makes logical sense that women bearing and nurturing vulnerable children close to their breast for all of living history leave them predisposed to perceive surrounding danger and are constantly gathering packets of information to build a social 'map' in order to stay ahead of threats.
I know I cant prove this on paper, but I think that there is a tiny subset of both sexes on the ends of the bell curve who's psychology does do not align with the coresponding communication style, and these are typically show up as either exceptionally compassionate nurturing men, or reasoned and calcalutive individualist women who despise gossip.
What a very insightful comment. Thanks for sharing it.
and... modern women still reject the facts & reality. so funny!
@@vianguyen1588 yes they (like katniss) are rare. or majority of modern women, they just try to imitate katniss, but in the end, they are just not even 10% katniss abilities 😁😆
"Every society rests on a barbarian base. The people who don't understand civilization, and wouldn't like it if they did. The hitchhikers. The people who create nothing, and who don't appreciate what others have created for them, and who think civilization is something that just exists and that all they need to do is enjoy what they can understand of it-luxuries, a high living standard, and easy work for high pay. Responsibilities? Phooey! What do they have a government for?"
...."and now, the hitchhikers think they know more about the car than the people who designed it, so they're going to grab the controls"
...."and they have a democracy, and they are letting the enemies of democracy shelter themselves behind democratic safeguards." ― H. Beam Piper, Space Viking
@@spacedinosaur8733 Totally
Something to go on the reading list and great cover art.
Feminism appears to be more of a way to dismantle a Nation. Let me explain:
It's not 'Feminists' who are the problem, as they are just naive to the words of sneaky, 'snake-oil salesman'. While both women and men can be manipulated by, 'faulty-products' shady marketing, bad philosophy, false promises etc..(bad men).. when these products and Ideas are sold, exclusively to women, there's a weak spot where 'good men', ironically, can not help.
If men are best suited to be protectors of women, in any given society or nation.. This is the week spot. Foreign Adversaries want your country to fail. Tricking women into hating their men only makes the 'bad guys' happy, as our Nation suffers as a whole.
Piper was a great author, sad he left us so soon. He did it on his own terms, even if we don't understand them.
Power doesn't corrupt, it just enables you to do whatever you want.
It doesn't corrupt, just shows who you really are.
“Kids don’t need a bigger house. They need values instilled in them.” Convicting words 24:02
With respect to what you said about bonobos, the irony is that male sexuality has been increasingly vilified and effectively criminalized while sexual liberation was celebrated for women. So, it’s actually gotten much worse for men which is reflected in that fact that there’s now a large disparity between the number of men who are sexually active and the number of women who are, because far fewer men are having sex because the pursuit of sex by men is considered socially unacceptable or worse, while it is celebrated for women. This is one of the most harmful aspects of the current push for a matriarchy.
Wow, you're totally right
It really annoys me when "pro-sex" feminists cite bonobos. In bonobo culture, the females use sex to curb male aggression. If humans actually acted like bonobos, then women would see male anger and frustration as a signal to submit to them sexually. In other words, some incel screaming in rage that he can't get laid would trigger a bunch of women to have sex with him. Does this sound anything at all like how women actually act? No! Of course not!
Completely not the case. Pursuit of sex by men is very socially acceptable. Not only is a guy who gets laid envied by peers, but considered a 'true man'. Women prefer men with sexual experience. Trying to laid is just 'boys being boys'. The 'vilification' is of consent and what exactly that means... Because of the power differential previously, it didn't matter if the woman objected and now that's in question
@@ne0x1ty How absolutely delusional. Only male sexuality is vilified in this country because of false claims like the ones that you just made that result in false paradigms like what you said about consent. It’s not living in reality. The reality is that men can be accused of harassment and worse for pursuing sex, for expressing the desire, for looking like they want to, and they have to be on guard for getting in serious trouble for even thinking it, which is why they have to be surreptitious about it. The whole comment about power is nonsensical as well. This is not the 80s anymore. Men who get laid as you say, which speaks volumes about the shallow and cynical way that you view it, are not talked about that way anymore. They may be envied but it’s because other guys are wondering how they pulled that off without getting in major trouble.
@@ne0x1ty Absolutely not true but CZcams is protecting your lies because I refuted your claims but my comment is nowhere to be found. What you said is absolutely untrue and male sexuality is vilified and effectively criminalized, and no of what you said maps onto reality in the current year.
Feminism has transformed the economic relationship between men and women from being complementary to competitive.
@@LawrenceMclean 100 %
Also agree, heard it out of my wife’s mouth the one year she made more money than me out of the 11 years we were married.
Women should have realized that in a good economic partnership with men most of them can benefit from his success more than they could achieve on their own. This is not men oppressing women. Rather it's men and women in a successful partnership oppressing their competitors of either sex. It only looks like oppression if women are determined to go it alone without partnering with men. (This only works for highly skilled, dedicated, focused women like old-time female physicians who were usually childless and often unmarried.) If they want to have children without men, this only works if the state takes over the role of husband/provider, which women in western countries have ensured that it does!
In addition, since the jobs women do are not as valuable (wealth-producing) as the ones men do (as Ms Byrd points out), when women try to work for money, the wages they earn just contribute to price inflation: more money chasing the same amount of valuable goods. (That's why it takes two incomes to live nowadays. The woman's wages simply push up prices.) No one will voluntarily pay for an HR department. It and the employees there (almost all female) exist only to comply with various government regulations that act as a make-work program. Same with social work Health care employs as many people as it does because it is substantially free or subsidized, so people buy more of it than they would if they had to pay for it. Teaching is valuable only if it produces better outcomes than home-schooling could. Our parents believed it did. Who does anymore? And female-dominated teachers unions ruined it! So unless women are working in the true private sector, producing wealth in return for a wage the employer pays willingly to purchase value, women's work is mostly inflationary and therefore valueless.
The idea that women should be able to go it alone and out-compete men is fundamentally a lesbian philosophy. Because lesbians *can't* countenance forming an economic partnership with men, they are driven into seeing themselves as oppressed. Same is true of heterosexual women who can't attract a man: they are doomed to bitter loneliness, the kind of soil in which Marxist philosophy germinates and thrives.
@@lesliemacmillan9932 Very well said-thank you.
@@lesliemacmillan9932 I liked your comment. Everything you stated is correct, however, there is another dimension that is not discussed, and not allowed to be discussed (as I have found out).
Western civilization is being destroyed. At a certain level in the political class the idea is that it is being destroyed to make something better. At a level of power above them, there is a somewhat more sinister motivation to restore Civilization to a state in which it serves to benefit solely those who own it (ordinary citizens being reduced to serfs). At the highest level, I think the motivation is revenge. There is evidence for my outlandish theory, however, you have to find it for yourself.
Im a man whose been a life long feminist for female economic and legal equality. Part of the reason is that I saw my Mom suffer because of her economic dependence on men. Now that I see my children growing up in a female dominated society I have had my concerns that something slipped off the rails. your brave video opened my mind to some taboo ideas. I don’t totally agree but I am willing to consider your views. i very much hope that the matriarchs at CZcams don’t cancel you. keep up the great work!
Book recommendation: _The Manipulated Man_ by Esther Vilar (1971)
It's a mixed bag of ideas: some of them anti-religion; some of them a little anti-natalist; but it all boils down to the fact that this woman already believes the human condition is powered by an unseen, and unspoken of matriarchy -- and it _really_ gets under her skin to think about it, too.
The unseen and unspoken are the widows of rich men.
Parents should not only teach men how to treat women, but just as importantly, teach young girls how to treat men. What a concept!
Amen
I did that with my daughter and she is so much better off for it! All of her friends struggle maintaining a healthy romantic relationship with men; and she has thrived. 🌹
That's not the problem. They are intermediate to actual children and actual adults, and societies operated accordingly for all of human history. No amount of teaching can remediate the consequences of pretending otherwise.
@@epicmercury333do you have some advice or insights about it that you can share with us?😅
@@lordexdj First I tried to model proper male before towards her, always treating her like a lady unless she was doing something really harmful.
Second, when she did become verbally malicious and manipulative with her brother, I warned her that girls/women have an advantage with words (and therefore, emotional manipulation). But boys/men have the physical advantage and that she needs to careful. If she ruthlessly attacks her brother verbally/emotionally, he’s eventually going to be bigger than her and use his fists.
She didn’t seem worried about it at the time, but she did stop being so cruel. Of course, I taught my son to restrain his physical aggression and channel his aggression into sports or worse case scenario, destroy an object and not his sister.
Within a few years, her brother was bigger and much stronger than she was. But I taught them both restraint: her to be careful with her words/emotional manipulation and for him to be careful with his physicality, because he could really hurt her without even trying.
Finally people are starting to understand we are currently living in a matriarchy.
And this is why society will come to an end, because of women and effeminate men incharge. May they ALL have Hell to pay.
Then the cycle will repeat and become truly patriarchal again.
Until we realize that both feminism and machismo are sides of the same coin we won't reach anywhere.
The mistake that normies commit is thinking that feminism is a noble movement, while originally it was, it has heavily deviated and turned into a misandrist cesspit weaponized to hand life on a silver plate to women who don't put the effort at the expense of the 99% of males in the planet who can't even have their first kiss and are blamed in spite of unrealistic standards of females.
It's not about women are all bad or men are all bad, humans in spite of their gender are garbage, a gender activism won't just fix that core problem.
We need to understand this in order to advance......
No, this is just the latest counterculture. Most people don't see things that way at all, not even along political lines.
@@DutchCobbler no, we are living in a matriarchy. Most people are just blind to what they don't want to see. They are playing ignorant because they don't want to admit what's right in front of their eyes.
@@godleveleldritchblast5257 You misunderstand my remark. I was not denying that we are in a matriarchy, I refute the idea that people have become aware of it.
Thank you so much for recommending my book, I’m so glad you enjoyed it 🙏🏻
Recommendations:
1) Patriarchy According to The Barbie Movie
*2) Jordan Peterson Doesn't Understand Gender Discrimination*
3) Are Men Okay? - SOME MORE NEWS
*4) 8. Materialism vs. Idealism: How Social Change Happens | What is Politics?*
*5) 7. The Origins of Male Dominance and Hierarchy; what David Graeber and Jordan Peterson get wrong*
6) 7.1 Material Conditions: How to Eliminate Sexism
7) Invisible Women: Exposing Data Bias in a World Designed for Men by Caroline Criado-Pérez (this is a book)
This video needs to be played acrross every class in in every university, followed by a discussion.
Never met a happy feminist but have met happy housewives.
People see what they want to see, unless they practice objectivity.
The happiest women I've ever met were nuns..I met one happily married woman but she wasn't a housewife and her husband was rich. They had one child. There's no general definition of happiness.
Same with men who sleeps around think they are alpha, they see nothing but a used up needles
I'm from Spain. In my country, when a woman marries, she keeps her surname. When she has children, they are given two surnames. The first is the father's, the second is the mother's. A person in Spain keeps their two surnames for life, hence why a married woman does not take her husband's name. There has been a trend though, of some married women adding their husbands surnames to the end of their two existing surnames. It is usually added with the use of the word "de" preceeding it. These women end up with three surnames. An example of this could be something like Maria del Mar Fernandez Alonso de Gutierrez. Too long..
@@NightinGal89 yes there is a definition of happiness , but you're probably meaning to say theres not anything in particular thatll make general human more happy, which is also nonsense. *morality of leftism vs rightism : fundemental motivation: one cannot even be sane without morality for your own sake regardless of morality . often, genes that spread are genes that help spreading or at least dont prevent spreading, genes limit potential prettiness, pateince, intelligence(empathy correlates with better), lactose intolerance etc. .
most people are habitually a mindless product of their environment, the ones that arnt remind theirself of what they must prioritize regularly, like every night. ...... increasingly popular mental illness is part of the worldwide shift to more loyalty to supporting immoral corporate-government machine in the worship of games like chasing low quality social status and overdosing into desensitization in lazy lifestyle. ................habitually remind yourself that people should instead win challenges especially in terms of long term collaborative trusting relationships. then prioritize existential exploration to ward off anxiety of what you couldve done, without spending all the time on it so you can ward off anxiety of missing out on other things , especially if you havnt been making much progress in exploration. then prioritize aesthetics. winning challenges is games, not being bored overdose desensitized consumer whos become too lazy to appreciate things, improve things, etc, because hes habitually isnt required much effort per reward.
.....................the people practicing and promoting the mental illness also wage war against abrahamic religions. think of your relationship with the creator of everything as a game you having to figure out what to do, so you do what seems rational based on what you were apparently made to do, which is to be happy,. this is close to what tour genetically made to do, which is spreading your genes, because genes that spread are the ones that help spreading or at least dont prevent spreading. judge yourself as if you are someone else. are your feelings functional? do you max information sharing for max likelihood of even unexpected productivity? you are not the creator of everything, you cant know so much, influence things minimaly unless you are very confident your influencing goodly
vocational science of freedom how your assets are stolen from birth on youtube,odysee,rumble etc. yandex instead of google,types of linux instead of windows/mac. ................... so many people memorize quran word for word, unlike any other text.how a real muslim believes in islam, including the promise of heaven whos reward is greater than anything anyone ever has before, and hell, a punishment worse than anything else, in exchange for practicing islamic morality, a grandeur purpose of life :see book called divine speech by nouman ali khan and sharif randhawa says " The Qur' an itself refers to its unmatched beauty and power as a proof of its divine origin, challenging its detractors to produce something comparable to it, or even to a single portion of it, if they claimed it was of human design (I0:38; 11: 13; 17:88). " "The smallest chapter (Surah) in the Quran is Surah Al-Kawthar. It is the 108th chapter and consists of only three verses. " - chatgpt .,so many people memorize quran word for word, unlike any other text.how a real muslim believes in islam, including the promise of heaven whos reward is greater than anything anyone ever has before, and hell, a punishment worse than anything else, in exchange for practicing islamic morality, a grandeur purpose of life
@@NightinGal89 I mean if you take a sampling of tiktok right now you will see woman after woman after woman who drank the feminist kool aid ranting about how much their life sucks and blaming everyone except themselves. The mental gymnastics some of them go through to blame everything on men is quite frankly gold medal worthy. And the rest of the time they're huffing high grade copium.
Don't see too many married women being miserable online unless they're feminists.
Whereas a tyrannical father says “Do it, your feelings be damned” a tyrannical mother requires you to like it as well” (edited)
So we should just keep bringing innocent children into that lovely world. Why?
@@kc6810 You dont need to live here. You can leave anytime.
@@kc6810 Women could change if they wanted to. And we should want to; what women, as a group, are doing is destroying everything.
@@kc6810because there are not only tyrannical parents in this world.
@@kc6810well, if you consider yourself to be a tyrannical mother to be - then don't, your unborn children would thank you for that mercy.
That was an excellent video essay. A lot of great points were made. Keep up the good work!
"A world without men would be bleak, unproductive, and resemble a third-world country, but worse." Agreed.
Yeah, because half of the human population would die. But the thing with this scenery is that they have a greater chance of surviving as a whole, compared to one with no women, because of our current biological advancements.
Its like in that old joke:
Heaven is when germans are engineers and italians are cops
Hell is when germans are cops and italians are engineers
Never heard that before, any references by chance?
@@brainkill7034 Its an old joke that have multiple versions. Just google heaven is when germans are engineers joke
Gold
How is this relevant to the topic being discussed?
@@vanbeet5105 Relevant in the sense that a system works great in one way, but if the roles reverse, it would be horrible.
The women who I grew up around in the 60s and 70s were smarter funnier more resourceful and industrious and had self awareness . Humility is a sign of intelligence .
What? Those same women are the reason the world is the way it is right now.
@@chadcadsonvii5258 They were women who were young in the 40's .They were real women who loved being women . Not feminists.
I would challenge the idea that humility is a sign of intelligence. There are a lot of intelligent people that are arrogant because of their intelligence. I would say humility is more a sign of the ability to self reflect, and an ability to set aside one's self
COVID was an excellent sign on that.
There were a ton of "intelligent" experts and credentialed professionals who overnight adopted mantras, rituals and reveled in being petty tyrants.
@@aaronadamson7463 humility is a sign of good character, also of self awareness and situation/reality awareness imo
This is a very thought provoking analysis, thank you, Erin. The reason I was recommended by CZcams to view your video is probably because I was researching into the writings of Esther Vilar which expresses similar views. I would very much appreciate your review of the book by Vilar, "The Manupulated Man" (1971). Thank you.
One thing about the current situation is that with women dominating the schools and so many fatherless homes, many younger college students have never been instructed or directed in a deep male voice with masculine delivery, and they find it threatening. Such students are liable to file unjustified grievances against their profs because it bothers them so much (this was also the opinion of one of my female department heads). Some single mothers bring their children to karate class largely so that their sons and daughters will experience male authority for a couple of hours a week.
Single parent homes really show who really matters.
The crime rate of people who only grew up with a mother is several times higher than that one people who only had a father, which in turn is only marginally higher than those who had both a mother and a father.
Boy Scouts used to partially fulfill that niche until the Chomos and pedos ruined it.
Every single feminist needs to watch the Bear Grylls show where the women were on their own island without men and nearly died from starvation and dehydration.
Reality doesn't care about idealistic movements or personal feelings. Too much wishful thinking gets you killed. That show was a great example of that
Boom!
They don’t care 😂
They mostly just sat around hoping things would get better magically.
Reality shows are generally not reality.
_But REAL feminism has never been tried!_
😁
Isn't that the same excuse that socialist use?
😂
Real feminism is inside a gay female home. Gay females are Twice as likely to divorce as two males, who lust for a man anus. Something to consider.
It was, they just died out, every time.... Since there was NEVER any technology the traces was lost in time....
No one actually believes the phrase "Sex work is work". This example. A man who is an electrician tells his landlord he cant make rent this month. The landlord tells him to pay what ever he can and tells the man if you do some electrical work at another one of my properties Ill waive the rest of the rent this month. This is an acceptable deal. No one would have a problem with that. Now same example but with a woman making OF. She tells the landlord she won't make rent this month. The landlord says if you have s*x with me Ill waive the remainder of the rent this month. Feminists would lose their minds over the 2nd situation. This would be condemned as exploitative. How could it be if "Sex work is work"? Both traded work for shelter.
It is hypocrisy that is all the world is riff with it. Much like many will support gender rights or gender equality but at the same time say gender is just a social construct not meaning man or women and I have no idea how many genders they are claiming exist now but when they mention gender rights or gender equality they mean woman's rights these people speak out both sides of their mouth with forked tongues.
If sex work is work, then it's not cheating if I pay for it
My friend recommended your channel. I enjoyed your research and perspective on this subject. Thank you.
Women don't understand "with great power comes great responsibility"
Women avoid accountability like the plague.
Neither do men, it seems. Think of atom bombs, poisons used on food, pollution of the planet. Yep. Men have royally fd everything up.
@@allynflinchbaugh4570 The fastest animal on Earth is a woman running from accountability.
Seriously. Like this is a funny joke and yet its not. Compare Toby Macguire's Spider-Man to the She-Hulk. Down-trodden and self-sacrificing versus successful and twerking. One a hero,....the other just a self-interested individual. Women,....and super-HEROES have nothing to do with each other. Marvel destroyed itself by not understanding that.
@@truthseekerodinson5094 His Spiderman lost his family, friends, job, even his powers and nearly dies (more than once) and yet, he still chose to be a hero and put others first.
This is a role model.
Meanwhile She hulk was all "Yeah but, I like, got wolf whistled at", and "My life is SOOOOOooooooooooo much harder than yours because of the patriarchy", while twerking in her really expensive lawyers office. She'd rather be rich and famous than do what it take to be a true hero.
This is sad.
I think matriarchies fail for the same reason Bumble got rid of their "only women can message first" mechanic.
At the end of all things. We all simply expect men to step up. And that's really all there is to it.
If men all disappeared, even the most devout feminist would still expect a man somewhere.... somehow.... to just appear and take care of something they need help with.
wait why did they get rid of it?
@@AnimalAlmighty Because women were complaining that they had to make the first move. You know. The entire point of the App. If I had to guess they didn't like being rejected instead of being the one doing the rejecting.
Ive seen men who hated each other, fist fight one another, then become best friends.
Ive also seen women hold a grudge for decades just to stab the other woman in the back at the worst possible moment.
Granted both can be said about each species. But one is more common place than the other
Please keep making these videos, they're great educational pieces!!
Matriarchy is already here and will continue to gain momentum so long as we have unlimited food and entertainment.
Actually, the ONLY reason that it continues is that men allow it to continue!
@@francisdashwood1760 No, that is a cope that women tell themselves. That is just another excuse women have concocted to convince themselves they aren't responsible.
We have guns. We have mass telecommunication technology. If women can convince even 5% of men to obey them blindly, those men can kill anyone that resists with technology. There is nothing regular men can do.
This is women's fault. And as I said in my first comment, it will not stop until society burns because people like you refuse to take responsibility for the power you have and the misuse of it.
Please keep denying it though. I am going to enjoy watching women suffer the consequences of their actions.
Women’s suffrage necessitates matriarchy.
Nope. The globalists won't allow it.
Frigid women after they become moms? Or the women who only want hookups? Procreation and family planning is all women’s responsibility @@francisdashwood1760
My mother was born in '30 and started college at 16. My grandmother expected her to get married, but my grandfather said 'you want to go to college? See the world? go do it'. And she did.
As an historian I have read a great deal of regular people stories. In the 19th century your everyday farm family had the father and son handling grain crops and maybe herd animals, maybe take the herd or grain to town. Women tended to take care of the garden, milk cow, orchard, cooking and cleaning. The work was done. No one was oppressed. Everyone did something. Who was oppressed there?
90% of the population, working people, systematically exploited by the owner class. 78 hour weeks, no breaks, no overtime, no job security, no benefits, no retirement.
"an historian" is how we know you are an historian.
Why do you hate women?
@@jeravincer Why do you murder puppies?
An exception you just made up means nothing.
I was unaware that the historical record was so light on matriarchal societies.
Plato said that there were five types of governing systems. The worst was tyranny. The second worst was democracy. He considered democracy to be the rule of appetite rather than the rule of wisdom (rule of wisdom being the best type of governing system. To be fair, democracy in Plato's Athens was not like democracy as practiced today. He would probably say that we live in an oligarchy (rule of money). But is "rule of appetite" a bad description for what we have today?
More children wnd up in prison from single mother families than single fathers.
Children of single mothers fare worse in every metric, while children of single fathers have almost the same results as children of two-parent families.
Part of this difference might be genetic though, as the problematic children have problematic fathers...
@@akaemzett Or maybe it's harder to be a single mother?
@@Olivia-Whow is it harder single mothers have way more free leisurely time have all sorts of welfare and government assistance to the point being a single mom is ‘almost’ incentivized yeah ‘almost’ yeah it’s so much harder that’s totally why they get such a bad rap because it’s sooooooooo hard 😅😅😅😅
@@Olivia-W I am sure it is. Consider the people who become single parents: In a certain environment, it is almost a given to become a single mom for women. For men, no such environment exists. Single fathers are created by exceptional circumstances and a lot of times, they have a very good support network, because their environment generally does not contain a dysfunctional family background, generational unemployment and precarious living circumstances.
Men who take on single fatherhood are generally capable and organized, otherwise they just wouldn't do it. For women, they are more often than not young, naive and emotionally bound by motherhood. Very different scenarios.
That is probably true for certain communities.All of the mass shooters including Trump shooter had fathers .
The Iroquois Tribe in New England was a matriarchy. They ended up getting crushed by outside tribes because they didn't see preparing for war as necessary
almost every matriarchy in history was destroyed by warring outsiders. That doesn't necessarily infer matriarchies, or peaceful societies, in themselves can't work, it merely means peaceful cultures cannot persist as long as there are warlike cultures hellbent on expansion still around them.
@@AzuraTarot even if the whole world was socially matriarchal or peaceful it wouldn't persist because some patriarchal or violent people would just take over and turn it patriarchal or violent again. Men tend to attempt to dominate, women tend to submit. It's just biology.
@@AzuraTarotAhhh, the classical, being against arms doesn't make you a pacifist, it makes you harmless!
lol if only life were that easy....shut up !!
I think it's kind of funny that people point to all sorts of "matriarchy" throughout history.... and never ask one simple question -- what happened to them?
Yeah, great, you found a dead society that didn't amount to much, and it was a matriarchy. How in the world is that supposed to support the notion that matriarchies are good things? Logically, I would think these feminists would realize that the "best" is what produced the "best" results, like Western Civilization that's given them all these amazing technologies and freedoms. Not some defunct primitive group off in some far corner of the history books. 🤣😂🤣
WOW! Well researched, edited, and presented. This is the best presentation I have seen on this topic. - your newest subscriber
Great presentation! Great essay! Thank you for your work on this video. It's very well put together.
Everytime a woman chooses a tall, strong broad shoulder man, she s clearly saying "I want security and leadership from someone else but me"
Maybe she just likes the look. Otherwise, no shorter, regular built men would ever get married or have a gf.
or maybe thise characteristics in a man produve heakthier offspring?
@@debrawehrly6900 both id say. need healthy kids and the security and strength to protect them.
@@debrawehrly6900 best chances at healthy and surviving offspring will be found in diversification of genetic outcomes.
@@debrawehrly6900 Yes your right. It is a woman's hypergamous nature on full display. But the thing is those tall men make up a small fraction of the population with more than 80% of women fighting for those men. The thing is women shouldn't be concern with a man's height anymore. We live in a safer society where many men have never been punched in the mouth, and jobs for men in high salary jobs use a keyboard and his build isn't important towards productivity.
Amazing how women can get their minds right when they're up against the impending draft 😂🤣
bingo!
But...aren;t there women already in the military?
@@debrawehrly6900 - reading comprehension much, cupcake?
DRAFT.
IMBECILE.
@@debrawehrly6900 - reading comprehension much?
DRAFT.
Don't need a d to fly a drone. However, have you seen the stats on female gamers?
Whoa, the CZcams algorithm actually sharing a video with really good information? I'm impressed. I will be subscribing:-)
It's like the rare event when there are rays of sunlight beaming through the clouds.
That's the weakness of youtube. It's calibrated to give us what we want by default, the exceptions have to be manually inputted. If people want good things, there's only so much youtube can do about that without completely self destructing.
Hearing you talk common sense, is infinitely more attractive than every indecent only fans account combine.
A large spoonful of War & a pinch of Poverty is all it takes to take down a Matriarchy.
The Utopia will turn into a terrifying Dystopia pretty quickly.
Either a bridge fell down, or it didn’t. Having your own truth won’t re-alive the people who lost their lives.
sad but what can only be done is to be responsible enough to never let something like that ever happen again !!
I just stumbled on your channel, and I love it. Intellectual discussions are something we need more of. You may have already covered this topic, but perhaps you could comment on the paper "Paradox of Declining Female Happiness." Thank you.
Excellent video. This is the first I've seen of you, now subscribed. Your note at the end, on how women can influence society without the misandrist structures recently built, is especially good.
Your channel is one of the very rare times CZcams recommended something GOOD instead of trying to feed me more propaganda.
I appreciate that a lot
They confuse a female figure head with matriarchy. For example, you can have a queen but that does not make it a matriarchy.
That's a Woman Brain. Their Brain doesn't have that Power. 😂😂😂
She’s a queen only at the behest of men willing to kill on her behalf. Literally.
From the American Heritage Dictionary
matriarchy
noun
A social system in which the mother is head of the family.
A family, community, or society based on this system or governed by women.
The collection of women in positions of power, especially in such a social system or community.
A social system in which the mother is head of household, having authority over men and children.
A system of government by females.
A form of social organization in which a female is the family head and title is traced through the female line.
This sounds a lot like a female figure head to me. Please elaborate on the difference between matriarchy and a female figure head.
@@Dave-um7mwHi Dave. Maybe an example would help discern a bit of the nuance. Queen Elizabeth I of England, whose father was Henry VIII, managed through constant political struggle, to rule a country almost exclusively governed and controlled by the noblemen of England. So one could reasonably contend that Elizabethan England had elements of matriarchy and elements of patriarchy.
The set of definitions for the word ‘patriarchy’ includes mildly conflicting notions, as is true for many words, so one typically chooses the definition appropriate to the conversation. But of course, subtle disagreements often arise, as to the specific meanings of the words being used. Sometimes these disagreements go unrecognized, causing further misunderstandings. I think Elizabethan England is an example of a society demonstrating clear elements of matriarchy (domination by a queen for decades), while simultaneously demonstrating clear elements of patriarchy (constant political and economic pressure by a society almost exclusively controlled by men (excepting the monarch in this case)).
[AI large language models use probabilities when modeling the characteristics of words, which naturally allows multiple meanings of words, at the cost of some rather abstract mathematical concepts. Humans typically solve the ‘multiple conflicting definitions’ problem by attempting to recognize the nuances and categorize the discussion by clarify the definitions currently in use for the specific conversation.]
@@Dave-um7mw Consider the meaning of "figurehead": _A person given a position of nominal leadership but having no actual authority._
Do you see the difference now?
Brought here by the algorithm. Congratulations on seeing your video pop off like it has!
This is really well done. Hope to see more from you.
Not a book recommendation, but season 2 of "The Island, with Bear Grylls" is applicable to this topic. There was an all male tribe and all female tribe, and the women did a fantastic job of showing why no matriarchy survived the test of time. In case you don't have that sort of time, the TL/DR is that the women were facing death from dehydration and had to be saved by out-of-game intervention. Their whole experience was bad choice after bad choice, like refusal to set a leader and adopting a couple of wild piglets as pets that they should have killed and eaten.
Not only that, but after the women spent an obscene amount of time trying to start a fire, when they finally got it going the narrator said something like “in only ten hours the women achieved what it took man hundreds of thousands of years to do”. 🤭
@@Mistmantle88 Yeah, the fawning, pro-woman bias was written all over the scripting - as is true of pretty much everything these days. However, even that couldn't cover up that the recorded material proved them wholly incapable of long-term survival without outside assistance. Given a few more days unassisted, most would've been dead.
This doesn't sound like the basis for a good study. Reality TV tends to screen for personality types that will create drama and get more views of the show. Not for people that will actually succeed at the tasks that are given. Also, it's misleading to take a small number of people and portray them as a reflection of a majority of people.
@Dave-um7mw true, but then we'd have to talk about things like "how many women are even willing to do a survival challenge?" "What personality types do we estimate would function better?" "Would any women participate at all w/o a female-appealing reward structure?" And so on. So that sword definitely cuts both ways.
@@spaceranger7683 agreed. I would imagine we (or at least the producers of reality TV shows) already have the answers to these questions do to how long reality TV has been out, especially the "what personality types do we estimate would function better" question.
I have worked in two female dominated professions, and neither are any fairer or "better" than working in male dominated professions. There's a lot more back-stabbing and subterfuge, though. I appreciate the honesty of other men. I appreciate the willingness to accept mistakes and do better the next time of women.
Me too
whats with female professions, they seem to be constantly stressed and burnt out despite work itself aint that hard... is it that highschool constant "game" socially to keep up to avoid that bad side?
Granted for male dominated ones any tiny sign of weakness causes same thus mistakes should not often be admitted.
I've worked with my hands my entire life. I have never been in a male dominated field (which is the only kind of work I have ever done) where mistakes have not been accepted or forgiven as long as the one who made the mistake isn't a complete mess-up and the mistake was honest and learned from. If a man *genuinely* apologizes and actually *wants* to do better and doesn't just brush it off as 'no big thing' then he'll be accepted and even taught better. Every time. Never had it any other way anywhere and I've worked in some nasty fields.
It's about Merit with men. Earn your way, learn your way, do well, don't be a burden. If something comes up for a dude that tears him apart (divorce papers, girlfriend cheating, departed friend or family member), guess what! We're there for each other. It's times like *that* when we cover for each other and carry that 'dead weight', and be there for one of our brothers. Nobody else cares about us, society hates us, so we care for each other in ways women will never, ever be able to understand.
You don't know. You can't know. You'll never know.
The one, single time I took an office job in a female dominated field it was an utter nightmare of backstabbing, underhanded social maneuvers, fake smiles, fake friendships, dissing each other behind each others backs (and never, ever saying anything about it!), following along behind the most toxic leadership imaginable without one peep about the wrongness of what is going on, and more. It was the worst two weeks of my life.
I'm convinced women aren't capable of love at this point. You don't even have friends; you have 'girls I don't hate today, but secretly envy or want to tear down'. Some of the stuff that comes out your mouths, a dude would lose teeth over.
@@SoulSoundMuisc Yup, there's a reason that imperial harems were known to be brutal bloodthirsty places. Mix the worst traits of women with actual power plays, assassinations and poisoning...
@@SoulSoundMuisc PREACH!!!
"Some of the stuff that comes out your mouths, a dude would lose teeth over."
Have literally witnessed this and thought the exact same thing.
I think recently or not the content that CZcams and my other social media is recommending me. It's incredibly amazing. I've subscribed to you.
Recomendations:
1) Patriarchy According to The Barbie Movie
2) Jordan Peterson Doesn't Understand Gender Discrimination
3) Are Men Okay? - SOME MORE NEWS
4) 7. The Origins of Male Dominance and Hierarchy; what David Graeber and Jordan Peterson get wrong
5) 7.1 Material Conditions: How to Eliminate Sexism
6) Invisible Women: Exposing Data Bias in a World Designed for Men by Caroline Criado-Pérez (this is a book)
7) Gravity Is A Social Construct, And That's Ok by Dr. Fatima
8) What does social construction really mean? by Jonas Čeika
This was fantastic, thank you. I learned a lot here, and I'm going to have to do some reading in order to challenge the status quo effectively. However, if that is what one must do, then it must be done. Again, well done!
I am overjoyed to see pro-family, pro-love, pro-cooperation content gaining some level of popularity
It's too late tho 🤔
@@robertmarley8852it’s never too late.
@@robertmarley8852
the bad times have to pass before the pendulum swings back to the good
@@robertmarley8852 Better late than never.
@@robertmarley8852 We'll get through this. Endeavor to persevere.
I’m glad as of late I’m seeing women speaking and pushing back against the chaotic society we live in today. I pray for this channel, to accomplish their goals in stimulating minds across the U.S.A for deeper understanding.
Yes, but those women are only speaking out and "pushing back" as you call it because it benefits them. They're unable to make a go of life without the assistance of men... so they're trying to come back into the fold.
*Useful CHAMELEONS.*
Women are SURVIVORS. It's their natural tendency to align with the winning side (in this case Men) to up their odds of Survival. Women are realising that Men are waking up n are refusing to Marry them. So they are changing colours ...
In the coming times, you will see more n more Wom3n doing that.
Notice how she said that 'I have compassion for the Women who do S3x work online' and that 'we live in an Unforgiving Society'. Both are the talking points of a Woman who has skeletons in the Closet.
That was amazing ! I loved your text. I love your presentation & your subject matter & it is so refreshing to hear this point of view from a woman. Thank you. You've given me more hope for humanity especially if your message will spread.
thanks for this very interesting summary take on the 2 books and the whole topic, much appreciated.
You can't run away fast enough from someone who uses terms like "my truth", "manifest", "partner." 🏃♂️➡️
hit the like button
w8, what's wrong with "partner"?
@@vesuvius1318because it's wife or husband. Partner completely demeans the relationship.
@@ronwatford7331 or fiance or boyfriend/girlfriend... i get what you're saying, though i'd be less concerned about that over starsigns lol
Next time someone asks me my sign, i'll just make something up, and watch their mental gymnastics.
@@ronwatford7331women want partners because bringing home a paycheck is nothing compared to all the 24 hr responsibilities wives have. And those things can’t be put off till later like mowing the lawn.
50/50 is a lie. I hate to seem like an ahole, but I'm tired of having this conversation. Every man must emancipate himself, because men are more incredulous than women. I have neither the time nor the patience
You should also address the elephant in the room: Women in general, are psychologically speaking, Adult Children.
@@kc6810 Women never spoke way about men until the 1990s when Hollywood & the Marxist-controlled Media pumped out hundreds of shows/movies of Fathers being bumbling dopes and Wives/Mothers as "Superwomen".
There is no way before then that women spoke that way of men, men who literally built civilization around the world.
@@kc6810used to?
@kc6810 clearly you've never seen them react to accountability. The men who do it today? Raised by single moms.
@@kc6810 , with all those advantages came accountability. Women, on the other hand, refuse it.
@@kc6810 used to? they still today , in fact it's far worse. As the ego's and superiority complex of modern women get worse do to their feminist indoctrination and how relationships are carried out on TV. or the movies plus Disney, you can expect more nasty things to happen. I doubt women even said anything along the lines of men being children, if they did they kept it to themselves back in the day , at least post WW2
Keep i mind those privileges less women who had no advantage had the power over a government ruled by men to pass prohibition. Outlawing alcohol and making many peoples lives difficult ( most likely they wanted to keep their men at home so they can dominate them without other men around them to tell them what their wives were actually doing) and they created organized crime like the mafia that reeked hell on others up to modern times. Good job ladies! and the real kicker is they didn't have the vote back then.
Every time I've seen only women working together, whether it's my time working in a department store that was 99% women, during group project work, or on TV with the apprentice and survival shows, it always falls apart almost right from the start. The fundamental problem seems to be a desire to avoid leadership, with the responsibilities of telling others what to do and risks that comes from the role, when some of those people being led inevitably get frustrated and talk bad about the leader or organise opposition to take them down. By pretending everyone is equal and there is no threat of punishment, nobody does the hard nasty work by choice. Taking offense is used as a weapon of offense and defence, which can spiral into huge drama sessions where every action and reaction are documented and regurgitated as reasoning for someone being a "bad" person. The desire to be the "good" woman to win in the eyes of the majority means never allying themselves with those who risk being called "bad" people, whilst men are far likelier to risk slander and defamation if it means standing by their principles. The loudest voices seem to intimidate other women into following them as they refuse to confront hostile forces, rather preferring to hide safely in the majority, instead of standing up for the proven smart successful voices. Eventually the disfunction becomes so bad, the silent majority either walks away for the group to collapse, or latches onto the few men or masculine women they have for guidance.
Excellent thought, provoking, essay… Wonderfully insightful, and given the modern, cultural context, extremely courageous… Bravo!
You only have 2k subscribers? You are going straight to the top with your style and diction!! Keep it up!!
You Tube probably thrttles her channel into near oblivion - except for the hard-core few who are dedicated because they recognize her brilliance.
@@supremereader7614 ding ding ding
@@LamelKendrick 👍👍👍👍👍👍
@@supremereader7614 It's algorithmic demotion, can't have an intelligent, attractive, curious and non-combative woman talk about such things, lest it rob the message of its narrative sway.
I can see 200k by 2025.
I read Rachel Wilson’s book not long ago and was stunned at how often these women were privately benefiting from men, especially elite men, while at the same time publicly claiming to hate men.
One incident that I saw in a documentary a while ago was the ‘Torches of Freedom’ of 1929. Edward Bernays, known as the Father of Public Relations and also a nephew to Sigmund Freud, wanted to increase sales of cigarette companies by breaking down the social taboo of women smoking. He enlisted the help of psychoanalyst A. A. Brill (an American associate of Freud) and 1st-Wave Feminist writer Ruth Hale and thus the ‘Torches of Freedom’ movement was born, encouraging women to declare their freedom from men by smoking cigarettes.
Incidentally, the ‘Revolutionary Women’ who marched in the 1929 New York Easter Day Parade while smoking were getting paid to do so by Bernays. Furthermore, Dr. Brill made a public statement that cigarette smoking was natural for women due to their, “oral fixation.”
Getting paid by one man in the early fields of marketing and PR while getting insulted by another man in the early psychological establishment; how liberating!
Women have always been masochists, that's what makes them so adorable.
Unfortunately, like everything, that masochism has been corrupted.
@@StarboyXL9 More like weaponized female fragility. But I get the idea.
Woah woah woah there, let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater, shall we? the guy might just have a point there about women's... um... oral fixation.
Alarm bells have evoked less of a response than the name Rachel Wilson.
Ah yes "Bernays" the father of propaganda. Poerful people used his book as a tutorial. Propaganda now is everywhere, you can't get away from it.
If true, the Frisian matriarchy outlined in the Oera Linda Book (available online) is an example of an ancient working Matriarchy. The FolkMother was basically the Moral Centre of society, she was the the final arbiter of Frisian law (Tex). Her role was a link to Freya, the mother goddess, though Wralda was God. She was surrounded by Kings who ran society, but they were subservient to the FolkMother. She was responsible for her societies wellbeing. Her role was mainly teaching, through training young women who had chosen a life of celibacy, and becoming teachers themselves. Few women were cut out for this role, and most opted for a family life, after their apprenticeship. Problems arose when the FolkMother failed to name a successor, and famously Kelta wished to have the role but was forced out to build a society at Karnac. It would be interesting to hear your perspective on this society. It obviously failed for a reason - the light was extinguished, but if true it must have existed for thousands of years.
The Frisian's ended up failing as a society around 4-5th century as a change in the climate from warmer temperatures to colder ones essentially invalidated their way of life, along with the invasions of Saxon peoples. They dug ditches and trenches to help irrigate the land for farming in the marshlands of what is now the Netherlands. Reduced farming capacity leads to the inability to fight off foreign powers as you do not have capability to wage extended war. Frisian society was eventually subsumed in the greater Christian sphere of influence a few centuries before Charlemagne (specifically by the Franks). They also explicitly worshipped the Nordic gods like Odin and Thor as the heads of the pantheon.
The earliest reliable records of this society is from the Roman historian Drusus in the 1st century BC. Then during the 7-8th centuries they were ruled over by a high king. The folk mother was more likely a position held within a sub section of greater Frisian society, it was merely a function of said culture and not a specific Matriarchy.
The Oera Linda is a collection of Frisian Mythology and occultism not an actual history. It has gone under much scrutiny because of its anachronistic nature, making it very difficult for historians to verify much of what it contains with any other contemporary sources. This has led many scholars in Germanic circles to believe the book itself is a hoax in and of itself.
I am so glad someone else finally understands the meaning behind the GoT ending! It was definitely a distinction between power and duty with Jon Snow being about duty versus unbridled power and Daenerys falling into power to suit her whims. Too many people caught up in the ID politics to see the true story, in fact rebelling against the narrative because it went against a corrupted world view.
Look at bear grylls survival island. How did the woman team progress?
Not so well
They had to be given food to survive, if memory serves.
The women were willing to whore themselves out near the end.
While the men built a camp in half of a week.
@@docbohemian1328they were given pigs and none of them had the balls to do what was necessary to survive. They couldn't seperate themselves from their feelings and "nurturing" nature. Those pigs ate better than all the women did.
@@thetjdman lol they started nurturing the pigs? That's your food! haha
Value cannot be upheld when there is no reward system in place in maintaining and preserving those values.
Values must be rewarded and reinforced. If you create a world where values still leave young men unemployed and underemployed, sooner or later, those young men are going to REJECT those values.
Conservatives often talk about values like religion and magic, as though they are not ABSTRACTION. They are abstractions and they will remain abstractions unless they are connected to actually making it in the world with real economic opportunities.
Once drug dealers, and FansOnly surpassed working men, and the opportunities for working men went out the window - anyone who believes they can preserve VALUES while these men are broke is foolish.
Values have to have a tangible benefit that can actually be MEASURED. If that is not the case then EXPECT for your values to be tossed into the trash heap.
SWP, nice seeing you here! Great points, I gotta reiterate:
Women don't build, they nest! Meaning, a matriarchy can only exist after the indoor plumbing and air-conditioned are installed into office buildings, OR with a complete lack of infrastructure.
Ladies aren't incentivized, via nature or nurture, to achieve great feats. They wait at the finish line to marry the best bridge engineer or wait for the when environment is safe enough to go out on their own. They simply won't take the risk to go out and make society safer and cleaner.
Well said.
@@kingmelanin7468 Agreed, moreover you can witness this mentality baked into them on the most fundamental instinctual level in ANY serious public conflict or confrontation. I mean there must be thousands of videos online where you can witness this, something happens (maybe a fight or accident) in the street, anything which is threatening to those around, in most cases men will turn and go towards the conflict to try and help, while the women immediately run away to protect themselves.
The level of anger and resentment is ridiculously high because men are unable to have a long-term partner and children that motivate them to go out and hunt aggressively for a kill. I've read that an excess of unmarried men results in gang rape culture. There's more violence. I'm not sure how it goes in western countries because China and similar countries to it have neets or hikkikomori that are simply tapping out without a fight. Countries in the middle east, India, and Africa end up with the gang rape and a thirst for violence. I guess the US has quite a bit of neets nowadays, like 30% of gen z for example. We'll see what happens.
Values are ideology.
Interests drive action.
You do what You want - and pay the price.
From experience grows a wisdom that is aligned to reality.
As reality is more profound then what is tangible, so interests can shift.
"Whose perspective takes priority"
Whomever is better supported by verifiable evidence.
The manipulated men by Esther Vilar is pretty popular book nowadays.
I really liked your video, thank you for for sharing, it was really informative. I learned a lot. So good to see women who can find her better strengths.
I imagine a world where women like you build a better society side by side with men, leveraging each others strength instead of arguing who is stronger and better, and exploiting each other.
What would that be called?
Give this woman an upvote guys 👍 she needs to be seen by more people!
Thanks for this eye-opening video. I'm a black man who is very concerned about the future of our country. I'm glad to see more women calling out the hypocrisy of feminism/the Matriarchy. This push to create a matriarchy was created by antiwhite oligarchs who seek to destroy Western civilization. Feminism, which is a subset of antiwhiteism, has white erased the norms and rules which make up Western Civilization. As you said, matriarchies cannot work without the participation of both men and women. In order to restore civility to Western civilization, the victimization of whites (Westernkind) must stop. A couple of books that you should check to further understand what I'm referring to is Go Free and Born Guilty. The author, Jason Kuhne goes into great detail explaining the current state of Western Civilization and how to reclaim it from further decline due to antiwhiteism.
Thank you sir, I've only seen a few dozen black men calling out antiwhiteism but it feels good to know we can recognize unfair treatment even when it's not occurring to us directly, we shouldn't artificially put down ANYONE, we need to forge the future the 20th century wanted which is color blind not color coded
No one is trying to establish a matriarchy, like you said a matriarchy would need the participation of both men and women, so does every other system. What is being sought is a more equal and just society where anyone can pursue their goals without societal hurdles like gender, race, religion etc.
There is no antiwhiteism in an equal and just society
@@davianoinglesias5030 then pie society is not equal and just
By every metric everything you said is false
Nobody is striving for equality, they are striving for equity which is inherently unequal
They are socially engineering a new culture where everything is flipped simply because we can, and white men are on the bottom of the social ladder
They admit and cheer on such a fate so don't even lie to me with your cope and 2013 reddit tier naivety
I can't really find anyone who truly behaves in a way that will bring about a truly free and color blinded equal future
@@davianoinglesias5030 It's all about white erasure. The society, which was created by Westernkind(the white race) creates a set of mores and values which make up Western Civilization. Those mores and values are being white erased by antiwhiteism. A more equal and just society is nothing more than another version of DEI. And DEI is antiwhiteism in its purest form.
@@davianoinglesias5030 An equal and just society is exactly what antiwhiteism represents. You're talking about a more equal and just society and that reminds me of DEI. Look where our society is right now because of DEI. We have people who are NOT qualified to do certain jobs, but because of DEI initiatives, white males are overlooked and not being hired in this antiwhite society. The trans agenda is being pushed so that men can compete in women's sports. In the end, the only way to restore our society to its former glory is to make antiwhiteism a thing of the past.
Nice voice for Yt, great content,all the best
This video made me emotional. Thank you for expressing the truth in a scientific manner. It's much harder to refute that way.
On my mother's side I am a member of the Cherokee Nation, one of the Iroquois matriarchal tribes you discussed. That system hasn't really been practiced since the removal, but before then it worked like this: Property was passed down through the woman, sort of like a dowry. Clan affiliation was also given through the woman and men were not allowed to marry a woman from their same clan. Women had an equal voice to men, but their voice had no more weight than anyone else's (thus equal). That was about the extent of it. It worked for my ancestors, but resembled something much closer to an egalitarian society than a pure matriarchy.
Feminism has robbed both men and women of their true natures, and ability to thrive. There are some lovely similarities between men and women. We are from the same species, afterall. But there is so much more beauty in our differences. When we are living in the correct roles, we come to compliment each other and fill in gaps that the other has. It is healing to live that way. I hope one day soon we can all get to experience that.
You're right when you say men and women have a lot of similarities. There's two arguments that just irk me to no end on the red pill side of things.
1: is the notion that women are unable to think logically and rationally. Them saying that men are more logical and women are more emotional. However when you do a little thinking on that, you realize women can be just as calculated and logical as an algorithm, and men can be as chaotic as the weather. And when you state this, those who generalize the genders can't explain how that generalization actually applies.
2. Is how the genders par bond. Both men and women release oxytocin during sex or any skin on skin contact. You have those in the red pill guru's that think men can have multiple "one night stands" and suffer no consequences from it. While ignoring that both men and women learn what the live, by living it. I'm not sure if you train your brain to not release oxytocin during the act, or if you train yourself to easily break that bond that is formed. I do however see the risks involved in having more than one partner.
@@schmalzilla1985 Oh, I absolutely agree! I can appreciate what Red Pill is trying to do, though I disagree with it on a factual basis. It feels like a movement for men to try to "reclaim" some semblance of what they lost when they gave into pure feminism. I say reclaim in quotes because it is revisionist history at best and completely ignores the very things you mentioned. It isn't a natural way of living for any of us, and comes off as some sort of revenge against women. Just like we see men do under feminism, where they give up what they want because they need to mate - the same is true with the red pill and women. It's harmful and dishonest.
@@schmalzilla1985 I wholeheartedly agree with you! I can appreciate what the Red Pill movement is trying to do, but what they largely promote is a strange mix of revisionist history and pseudoscience. It isn't a return to anything from the past, and sort of feels like some attempt at revenge for the feminization of our culture. I long for a day when we can just accept each other and get on with living.
@@schmalzilla1985 My comment keeps getting deleted. I just want to express that I wholeheartedly agree with you.
We definitely live in a Matriarchy. Women have no accountability and get so many more privileges than men. Most women know this, too.
Not exactly. It's a propped-up version of a matriarchy. It's a ''matriarchy'' that couldn't exist without men
@@francisdashwood1760 gynocracy.
Men do everything that women tell them to do. This is indeed a woman's world.
THE UGANDA NIGHTMARE KAMALA HARRIS IS A GREAT EXAMPLE
@@francisdashwood1760 No Matriarchy can exist without men.
Helicopter parenting comes from women not men.
The feminine wants to care for babies. The masculine wants babies to grow up strong and independent.
The feminine doesn’t let go and would have all people be babies to be perpetually coddled. The masculine wants them to move out, get a job, and start their own family.
Great video and your presentational style is excellent.
This video should be in the dictionary under 'Common Sense'