Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.
I BELIEVE YOU HAVE COMMITTED AN OFFENCE UNDER THE NATIONAL SECURITY ACT!!!! - BAE Systems Glascoed
Vložit
- čas přidán 13. 06. 2024
- Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @thegwentauditortga
What is going on everybody, this is TGA, and in today's video, we visit BAE Systems in Glascoed, for the first time in nearly 3 years now I believe, but hope you enjoy this video, the Security Manager here tries going down the National Security Act 2023 route. We do get the drone up from multiple angles, and get some film of the site.
You've got to watch out for that National Security Act.
"I'm an ex-cop, I know how the law works", bollocks, he proved on camera that he didn't know the law under his own interpretation.
Security need to learn NO badge, NO authority
No authority anyway regardless
It should have a no fly zone over it then if they want it that secure the 🔔 ends!!
An ex cop knows the laws 😂😂
There are no signs saying its a private rd , i doubt they own the rd , the double yellow lines are put there by the council
The BAE facility was Royal Ordnance Factory Glascoed No 54 opening in 1940 and transferred to BAE in late 80s with privatization. Several websites including BAE detail the site history. Paul Bartlett page hosts great assortment of ROF Glascoed railway wagon photos.
Awesome location and video. 👍⭐⭐⭐
Thank you, and it was during the war
He’s talking crap, that’s his interpretation of something he’s overheard.
Ex police ……. Copslaining again, they just can’t resist it !
Deep in them the paranoia is..
Traitors
Considering the place has been audited before, they haven't learnt a thing. More visits needed.
When did we come under martial law?
He's talking BS show the new paper work passed by the GOV the sky is free
Exactly
National Security Act 2023
"Filming and inspecting a prohibited place with a camera or unmanned device"
@@rogerbroadbelt3424 “for a purpose that is prejudicial to the safety or interests of the United Kingdom”
@TheGwentAuditorTGA Read section 5. As always, you've only read what supports your agenda
@TheGwentAuditorTGA they always seem to forget that part, don't they...
The act has very specific intent requirements for an offence, yet no one remembers that when they quote it.
First guy was a good decent bloke 👏 👍
Just the usual bull, it is not a private road unless it is stated. Bet the council maintain it. Just another security jobsworth trying to justify his existence.
NSA 2023 It’s designated to particular sites, not cart blanch cover!
That place your drone took pictures off ,reminds me of an American out post
There's no no-fly zone in place which there would be if it was a protected site. Therefore get them drones over.
Its great that they are admitting on film though that there's something sensitive going on at the site so that any unfriendly government know where to target.
@@yorkshirewanderer6176 The law says no drone flying, you don't need an app to tell you that, its down to the drone operator to check there are no restrictions in place to start with (apps, websites and laws prohibiting drone flying), which they failed to do.
@tonyb1223 You need to learn the law then. Just because a police officer says something it doesn't become law.
@@yorkshirewanderer6176 You need to read the law, it's in the national security act 2023, quite clearly states that it's illegal to fly a drone that can inspect a prohibited place under said act (section 7 defines a prohibited place, such as a defence works like this BAE site).
"I believe I may have committed an offence by talking complete BS under the National Security BS act"
Lovely countryside we have in wales 😊
Indeed it is
26:43 Or they could just come down themselves and take their own pictures 😐. Right? There is literally nothing stopping them.
Confusing instructions
If this is covered by the act then signs have to be in place clearly stating the law. If they are so concerned then to stop any ambiguity a FRZ should be asked of the CAA. The law restriction is already there so why bring in another law to confuse? I thought the act only applied to MOD sites anyway as it involves the official secrets act which is not related to private business. I may be wrong so anyone with more knowledge please answer✍️😎
It applies to MOD contract sites, such as this one.
@@50milliondownthedraintonym16 How is stating facts 'trolling'? That's a typical response from someone who gets their education from these videos
The Official Secrets Acts applied here, but they have been trumped by the new National Security Act.
It applies to sites in relation to defence purposes, which this comes under, and sites which fall under MI5, MI6 and GCHQ, however it only applies to those who have genuine hostile intent, however you could fall foul if you capture and publish something which would not otherwise be in the public domain, such as a new weapon being moved etc
@TheGwentAuditorTGA Read section 5.
His concerns proved to be misplaced, but thankfully his approach was relatively moderate! As ever great content, TGA!😊
Yeah, could get somewhere where they won’t listen to my understanding at all. I won’t let the National Security Act deter me. I plan on still doing some defence sites
@@TheGwentAuditorTGA Good for you TGA! Thanks & continued respect!
@@TheGwentAuditorTGA Hopefully a few months in prison may deter you from breaking the law as you have owned up to understanding it and yet still want to break it, enjoy your time with Leroy and don't drop the soap 😆
Ex Cop , say no more
lol Balloons are not allowed to fly over
how are they supossed to avoid it
What a very misinformed guy that was at the end. If he really was a cop ever, it's no wonder he's an ex one. Going on his paranoia, I'd say maybe he was once.
They are a private company contracted by military. So not a defence site
Incorrect
He’s got more rabbit than Sainsbury’s he doesn’t give it a rest…..
Lots of copsplaining from the ex-copper at the end.
Security parked on double yellows and full white lines in middle ,means no stopping not a very good look
Hi another great vid guys , he was a decent guy from BAE . Regards mark
Thank you Mark
I see what people are saying and if it was national security it would have proper security by armed personal and it would be all round it. The first thing is to check in the local council offices what are the drawings for this area. You get an answer you will know if not check with mod what they have covering this area no answer then you are on to something. Probably not what the general public would like the MP would know but he would be tight lipped just like Nigel Farage said his first impressions were. So it is some thing to do with the wokes possible, and what was Bill Gates doing when he had a flying visit during covid is another possibility. Then there are the general things munitions specialist things they are thrown round the country. For a while the shells for the tanks in desert storm was from depleted plutonium. then there is the unknowns like covid and such like. These bastards have to be watched but be care full the play hard. Really why have we got this influx of nasties and our police have started to shift from general policing to start do specialist policing. I get the feeling we are being herded into groups. I left Britain start of last year when prices for flights started to rocket. There are reasons for everything and hiding the real purpose is an art form with our government.
It's not recommended to admit on video that you've lost line of sight.
I don't think it was TGA flying, it was his friend's drone I believe. 😎
Yeah it was my mate’s larger than 250g drone, with his A2CofC
Back in the early days woman who filled the bombs with the chemicals didnt wear any protective clithes or gloves so when then brushed there hair off there faces they would end up with a light streak in the front of there hair line
Where is this place , ? 😮
Monmouthshire, near Usk
Didn't know they had this stuff over usk where abouts are they hiding this then?
Flapping his gums talking twonk, if there is no restrictions, you can fly. It's just his feelings and what he doesn't want. There must be hundreds of pictures of this place all over media. Just another ego trying to impose his will.👊
What a total Richard head
The security manager was spot on, anyone who thinks otherwise has no idea about the law, what you can or cannot do whilst out doing photography, the intention has nothing to do with it because if you were the one recording and then put it on the internet for 9 billion people to see, guess what, you are either completely stupid or you had an intention in the first place.
Lets see what the law actually says, rather than listening to a couple of muppets who have no idea.
First up, the only law that gives you a right to express a freedom such as photography or filming.
Freedom of expression
1Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers. This Article shall not prevent States from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema enterprises.
2The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.
Note the part where it says in the interests of national security.
Next up, the 2023 NSA.
Unauthorised entry etc to a prohibited place
(1)A person commits an offence if-
(a)the person-
(i)accesses, enters, inspects or passes over or under a prohibited place, or
(ii)causes an unmanned vehicle or device to access, enter, inspect or pass over or under a prohibited place,
(b)that conduct is unauthorised, and
(c)the person knows, or having regard to other matters known to them ought reasonably to know, that their conduct is unauthorised.
(2)A person’s conduct is unauthorised if the person-
(a)is not entitled to determine whether they may engage in the conduct, and
(b)does not have consent to engage in the conduct from a person so entitled.
(3)In subsection (1)(a) a reference to inspecting a prohibited place includes taking, or procuring the taking of, photographs, videos or other recordings of the prohibited place.
(4)For the purposes of this section, a person engages in conduct mentioned in subsection (1)(a) if the person does so in person or by electronic or remote means.
Now lets see section 7 where it defines a prohibited place.
Meaning of “prohibited place”
(1)In this Part “prohibited place” means-
(a)Crown land in the United Kingdom or the Sovereign Base Areas of Akrotiri and Dhekelia which is used-
(i)for UK defence purposes;
(ii)for extracting any metals, oil or minerals for use for UK defence purposes;
(iii)for the purposes of the defence of a foreign country or territory;
(2)In subsection (1) use for UK defence purposes means use for the purposes of-
(a)the activities of the armed forces of the Crown,
(b)the invention, development, production, operation, storage or disposal of weapons or other equipment or capabilities of those forces and research relating to it,
(c)United Kingdom defence policy and strategy and military planning and intelligence, or
(d)plans and measures for the maintenance of essential supplies and services that are or would be needed by the United Kingdom in time of war.
And finally, what does the CAA say about flying drones (drone code section 8)
Follow any flying restrictions
and check for hazards
Always check for restrictions and hazards before you fly.
Byelaws
Byelaws may restrict when you can fly and where you can fly from.
Look out for local signs for information and contact details where you can find out more. Byelaws are unlikely to be shown on apps or drone websites.
Restrictions also includes laws such as the 2023 NSA.
This is the difference between a real photographer and someone out to cause issues and get photography restricted (auditors).
Anyone who thinks that I am wrong, it's all in black and white and the references are there for you to go and look up.
You're wrong
@@codinbatter and you can't even back your answer up as all the facts are listed above 😆 muppet 🤣
@@codinbatter Nothing to counter except "you're wrong" because you can't as I am right 😆
STOP TALKING UPHOLD YOUR RIGHTS let them keep talking HNK solicitors enjoy the payday.
😂😂😂😂
The payday will be a few months in prison, HNK won't be able to save anyone from breaking this law 😆
lol he thinks he can interpret the law to suit his narrative, sadly thats not how it works
Jackanory time
Try bae Henlow missile site, near Hitchin
I bet his name was Warwick Hunt!
Just been on Google maps you can view the whole site.This so called head of security is a pointless numpty
👍👍
20:45 If what you put on social media is used by someone else for nefarious purposes doesn't mean you get into trouble. Only the person who used you content can get charged. The guy is flat out wrong otherwise Google would be in bother for having the site on Google Earth.
There's a surprise. Sad Lad not understanding again 😂
@@mikeel6074 He's a bit of a muppet tbh, has no real understanding of the law when it even tells you the person commits the offence if they do any of the following, including inspecting and taking photographs of the site, I mean it isn't hard to understand this but some people don't understand that the internet also has bad people looking for idiots who upload stuff like this and the fact is, this isn't upholding the right to photography, it even states that in article 10, yet people believe it and you then get people like sbml who fall for it without any understanding of what it means.
fair play
Last person talking rubbish
Theres alot more underground
Its not a secure site otherwise red zone it then if there is no fly zone then that is bs
I think you should go and read the drone code, there does not have to be a FRZ if there is a law covering it in the first place.
@@tonyb1223 wrong i know the code thanks i have a drone
@@StraightOuttaUrbex Really? Then you should read it again as you seem to be lacking its understanding.
@@tonyb1223 I know plenty thanks places like that if it has no restrictions then you can fly I've flown over places like it including former raf bases without issues maybe instead of backing the idiot BBC who know nothing back people who know what they are talking about
@@StraightOuttaUrbex Well you don't seem to understand the law for sure 😆
If you have ever read the drone code (by the sounds of it you haven't), it tells you that there may be laws in place which restrict flying (and that they won't be in apps or on websites), such as this, but hey, you have a drone and that means you understand everything that goes with it
😄
Talking complete ball as normal
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
BS, sick of listening to this rubbish. If, buts and maybes!
He is talking crap
Yawn. Same old.
That man at the end is full of his own self-importance. Full of shit!
Why didn't you call out the bullshit?
@@rayhall7932 I did