Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.
Did Yeshua Multiply Death and Feed It To The People? - Loaves Without The Fish in Early Writings
Vložit
- čas přidán 4. 06. 2024
- You can buy a print copy of The Rock Of A Sure Foundation for $17.77 at this link:
www.amazon.com...
If you want a FREE PDF copy of The Rock Of A Sure Foundation, download it here: drive.proton.m...
If you want the document with the quotes are references to the Gospel According to The Hebrews, download it here: drive.proton.m...
This playlist has detailed information about the fact that the original Christians did not eat meat: • Did Jesus Teach His Fo...
Make sure to check out these videos also:
Does Peter Certify Paul as an Apostle? • Does Peter "Certify" P...
Why Do Christians Hate Jesus' Words? • Why Do Christians Hate...
Taking Scripture "Out of Context"? • Taking Scripture Out O...
Have We Missed the Gospel Because Of One Word? • Have We Missed The Tru...
The Truth About What Jesus Taught About The Law: • The Truth About What J...
What has the Church hidden from you? Do you know the Truth or just what you have been told? Do you want the rest of the story? Can you handle it? Was Yeshua (Jesus) a Christian? Was He a Pharisaical Jew who died for our sins? Or was He teaching something radical and different than mainstream Judaism of his day taught, something different than Mainstream Christianity today? Something that got Him killed and His message hidden after His ascension? Is the Truth still out there, buried in long-forgotten books and vague historical references by the very men that wiped out the original faith and message once delivered to the saints? I invite you to join me as I search out the original Faith of the Yeshua and the 12 Apostles.
Follow me on Gab TV and Odysee also:
tv.gab.com/cha...
odysee.com/@Da...
I don't know why so many reject the fact that Jesus/Yeshua was vegan when most would agree that he lived the perfect will of His (our) Father only. The first page of Genesis clearly states God's instruction for our diet (Genesis 1:29), which is whole food, plant based. 🙏🏼❤️
@@ChristinaFromCZcams It is actually rather perverse to drink the milk of another species, which would be God's formula for the babies of that species, not us. I can understand people doing this in times of need, in a manner which doesn't harm the animal, but we shouldn't be turning it into a farming practice. If you research Krishna, the chief god of Hinduism, there are many pictures of him (and children) actually sucking on the teets of cows. It is quite creepy and weird (the entire religious fetish with cows and drinking their milk seems to come from idol gods like Krishna, who when closely examined seem to be the antichrist/devil himself). Nothing wrong with honey, so long as we aren't being unkind to the bees - but if you look into bee keeping practices there are many perverse evil things being done especially with large scale high profit practices, like forceful insemination of bees, clipping their wings off, etc. The meaning of "land flowing with milk and honey" in its pure sense could indicate a very fertile region of earth that has healthy and vibrant animal and plant life. Ideally we humans would move in and live in friendly harmony with all that, in the nature of Abel, rather than exploit, enslave, and abuse it all in the nature of Cain.
But Jesus eats boiled fish at his resurrection.
@Arvak777 Are you referring to Luke 24:36-44? The ending of Luke contradicts Matthew and Mark where Yeshua tells His Apostles that He will see them in Gallilee, because Luke has Him appearing in Jerusalem. It also describes Yeshua Ascending into heaven on the day of his resurrection (vs 50-53), while Acts says it was 40 days later. It is believed to have been added to the Gospel of Luke as a refutation of the doctrines of Marcion, since Marcion taught that Yeshua was resurrected as a spirit with no body.
He ate passover lamb. So no he was not vegan.
@@clintdavis7434 No, he didn't. He did not bring death into his temple. He obeyed the instructions God gave us Genesis 1:29. God does not change.
Wonderful compilation of evidence. 👍👍 "I am the alpha and omega" : the beginning and the end are vegan (Gen 1:29 / Isa 11), it is only in sin that we feast on bloodshed and death, which resulted from partaking of the Tree of egoic Knowledge. If we are praying for God's Kingdom to come, for His will to be manifest on Earth as it is in heaven, and we are thirsting for the righteousness of that Kingdom, we should certainly have compassion for other earthlings who little children will lead in the Kingdom. Adam didn't name all the animals to slaughter them, but to have relationships with them, like Abel the good shepherd ❤
Excellent video brother! I am going to upload this to my channel as well!
Shalum, Yahushua
John 21:9-11
Luke 24:41-43
Should help clear up some of the confusion.
@JesusChrist_Is_Lord Ah yes, John 21 which was added to the gospel after the death of John, and the ending of Luke which was added as a refutation of the doctrines of Marcion.... right that clears everything up. Lets also ignore that the added ending of Luke contradicts the opening chapter of Acts, as well as Jesus' instructions to His Apostles that He would see them in Galilee.
Shalom Aleichem. May the Lord be magnified.
🐟🐟🐟 there's a difference between decaying and cooked/salted fish 🐟🐟🐟
Dead is dead. Whether it is raw, salted, cooked, or sprinkled with holy water, dead fish begins the process of rotting and decomposing as soon as it dies.
And everyone is offended that I pointed out the fact that the fish is dead, which is probably an attempt to distract from the fact that the evidence points to the fish not originally being part of the story, which was the actual purpose of the presentation.
Shalom David. I am with you fully on this matter but how then does one explain the account in Mark 6:41
@Faith-iy9fw The explanation is that the fish were added to the story sometime after the council of Nicea.
The following quote is the Bible to a T, an obtuse idea that the Jew wrote and the non-Jew racks his brain and wastes hours of his life each day trying to make sense of a purposely, nonsensical book.
"I can very well imagine how this collective madness came to birth. A Jew was discovered to whom it occurred that if one presented abstruse ideas to non- Jews, the more abstruse these ideas were, the more the non- Jews would rack their brains to try to understand them. The fact of having their attention fixed on what does not exist must make them blind to what exists. An excellent calculation of the Jew’s part. So the Jew smacks his thighs to see how his diabolic stratagem has succeeded. He bears in mind that if his victims suddenly became aware of these things, all Jews would be in peril."
I don't understand where you get death
@screwball1010 you think he was multiplying LIVE fish? If the fish were dead and he "multiplied" them he was multiplying dead animal corpses.
@DavidHNotsari AT LEAST HE DIDN'T MAKE THEM EAT THEIR BABIES! LEVITICUS 26:29.
@@DavidHNotsari To multiply death, means to k!ll, and without context it refers to people. That's different from multiplying dead fish. Even if you said Jesus was multiplying dead (not death) it wouldn't be complete unless you refer to an animal served as food.
@@DavidHNotsari there's a difference between decaying and cooked/salted
Dead is dead. Whether it is raw, salted, cooked, or sprinkled with holy water, dead fish begins the process of rotting and decomposing as soon as it dies.
And everyone is offended that I pointed out the fact that the fish is dead, which is probably an attempt to distract from the fact that the evidence points to the fish not originally being part of the story, which was the actual purpose of the presentation.
And @ubuntuposix According to Genesis 1:29, fish is not food. There is no reason for me to refer to a dead animal as "food" when I do not believe it to be such, and the historical evidence we have points to Jesus not eating dead flesh, which tells me He didn't consider it to be food either.
Hare Krsna ..he was vegetarian (see Isaiah 7:14-15). There’s nothing wrong with the land of milk and honey. These are not the result of breaking the 6th commandment. There are more sure marks of authenticity in this channel than effectively any Christian apologist channel. (Notice Isaiah 7:14 Christian’s use as prophecy of Jesus.. but note 7:15..)
Saul of Tarsis didn’t “hijack” the church. You need to research the origins of the word church. It isn’t Ekklesia, which is more accurately translated as assembly. Saul of Tarsis did what he was assigned to by Christ. Christianity ended 70AD. Those who were left behind at the wedding feast of the lamb, who had the doors closed to them, founded the Church. All of the Bible was fulfilled by the destruction of the temple in Jerusalem, and the events surrounding it.
@adamperez8555 The wedding feast was called for in Revelation 19, at the destruction of Jerusalem, but the wedding feast was not full because most refused to come/were not worthy, like in the parable of Matthew 22, therefore the king destroyed those who refused to come and burned their city. Jerusalem was destroyed and satan bound (Rev 20). The marriage isn't going to take place until Yeshua returns again, and for now the messengers of the king are gathering guests. We're essentially both in Matthew 22:9-10 and Revelation 20:7-8 at the same time right now. The bride doesn't show up to the wedding until Revelation 21, after the Gog/Magog War, and that is when the doors slam shut.
As far as Saul is concerned, he did not do "what he was assigned to by Christ". I don't believe he ever met Jesus... possibly satan claiming to be Jesus, possibly Simon Magus claiming to be Jesus, but definitely not the real Jesus Christ. The real Jesus make the blind see, Paul's Jesus makes the seeing blind. The real Jesus casts out demons, Paul's Jesus refuses to. The real Jesus keeps and teaches God's Law, Paul's Jesus claims to have abolished the law.
If Saul was really chosen by Christ, why did Christ warn us specifically not to follow Saul at least 7 times in the gospels? Why did Paul denigrate the Apostles, and he even confronted Peter in Antioch (an argument which he lost, BTW)? Paul was a demon-possessed liar and a deceiver by his own admission.
Who? Isa. Iesous. He was not jehovah's son. The books are deception. But behind every bit of deceit lies a truth. Remember that.
Please, kindly tell what you believe in
@@wserthmar8908 I will. Thank you for asking. I believe that the Bible is a spellbook. Everyone who's called to read it, is also called to defeat it. I believe the god of this world is the devil, and according to the book, his name appears to be jehovah or yhvh/yhwh. I believe that The Christ came to free us from the covenant, but the spell is so strong, people are trapped. Even Christians believe jehovah is god. I believe there is truth hidden in each of the religious texts, split up and set against itself. I believe we can resurrect Iesous/Jesus in our hearts and reunite Him with His Bride, The Holy Spirit. I believe He has been in the ground/sheol for 3 days which is 3,000 years (2 Peter 3:8). I believe in meditation. I believe Mother Earth is divine, and we have been separated from her through manipulation. Lastly, I believe jehovah is the god of destruction and he's going to attempt to reset us soon, make us forget, dwindle the population because his idea of eternal life is reincarnating here in hell over and over and over again so he can harvest our energy, our work, our love. I believe Jesus is the only way out; not that guy they wrote about in the book, but the real guy who came to save us. The one the stories are based on. The Gentle Shepherd. The Compassionate, Loving Father.