BEST Human Rights Laws in Victoria 3
Vložit
- čas přidán 2. 06. 2024
- Patreon:
/ generalistgaming
Discord:
/ discord
Check out my main CZcams here:
/ @generalistideas
Other Strength/Fitness CZcams, Generalist Strength:
/ @generaliststrength7578
Instagram:
/ peter.curtiss
Tags:
Strategy Games, Victoria 3, Interest Groups, Economics, Production Methods, Colonization, Playing Tall, Landowners, Industrialists, Armed Forces, Intelligentsia, Carthage, Hannibal Barca, Suez Canal, Ottoman Empire, France, Russia, Universities, Canning, Arms Manufacturing, Quinine, Malaria, Rifling, Tooling Industry, Clippers, Small Arms, Cannons, Timber, Iron, Soft Wood, Hard Wood, Migration, Encouraging Migration, Customs Union, North Africa, Multiculturalism, Mercantilism, Oligopoly, Hannibal Barca, Colonization, Greener Pastures Edict, Maps, Resources, Japan, Nippon, Shogunate, Automation, Revolution, Civil War
Starting Steps, How to, Starting a Game, Beginning - Hry
"Slavery is bad because you can't tax slaves"
- Abraham Lincoln
+25% Tech Spread from Protected Speech is uncapped though, so I could see that being very helpful for "catchup" nations, particularly those in Asia who can spam universities to catch up to europe fairly quickly.
I'd argue that most countries that really uses tech spread a lot would have a hard time going protected speech while tech spread is still valuable
personally I've never experienced any death spirals due to workers protections and it's been pretty good for my SoL
I've only had it happen when a resource in the supply chain gets a bit too tight, and drives down profitability of a good used in several places. Lately, it's been rubber shorting tools, but I have had wood and oil be the offenders in the past.
I'm not sure it happens anymore. Like you don't get the gov wages death spiral either anymore because of wage changes.
Can’t wait for the follow up video on best human wrongs
holy shit! when i heard ur choice over labor rights, i remember my Spain run that i faced the exact same problem when i had worker's protection law. with ur reason, now i understand why my stack of industry buildings in Vietnam (which was 2 years from becoming incorporated states) couldn't hire pop.
By the way, I was also surprised by the selection of the best law in the free speech category. Your reasons are very logical and correct. I have always instinctively sought the adoption of Protected Speech. Like a greedy person, I sought to pass a law that would give me a better status. But I was unaware that many times by doing this, I was causing myself to lose useful mechanics, which ultimately caused more damage to me. For example, in the same match with Spain, because the leader of the intelligentsia continued to work until the age of 76, the adoption of the multiracialism law was delayed for 10-15 years. I think this honorable man followed Joe Biden's way and even wanted to continue serving the people until he was 100 years old on a stretcher or in a hospital bed! I have never hated a game character as much as I hated this old dog in my life.
In short, I realized from the way you value the rules that first, the lower the rules are in the list, it is not the reason that they are better. Second, sometimes getting one or two positives in a rule isn't worth the mechanical closure it gives you.
Super helpful, thanks generalist!
Glad it was helpful!
Not algorithm things, helpful af as always ❤
Thank you!
For me worker protection make my pops easier to go up in strata especially from low to middle, so my industry not get penalty. And i see in forum you need balance pops that have low, middle and upper strata jobs in your factory or you get some penalty.
They should probably go up in wealth a little, but just to be clear they still get paid out based on wage multiplies so an academic is poised to get 4x a laborers pay. Also strata is defined by job, not wealth level, so rich laborers will always be lower strata, even if they have more money than a capitalist.
@@generalistgaming ooo, i thought strata is base on SOL because in population tabs every excess money will increase their sol and base on my view higher strata tend to have more money and higher SOL
Higher strata jobs have bigger wage multipliers so they'll generally have more wealth/SoL. The upper strata consists entirely of ownership class (capitalists/aristocrats) unless I'm mistaken.@@jaguranjiantak4315
@@generalistgaming thank you, for explaining it to me, honestly i still new at this game and i still learning and I'm just cheat all content in game so i can learn how they work.
Regarding Old Age Pension, isn't the reduction in workforce ratio% too hurtful? Or does the dependent's income more than cover the loss of workforce in terms of fueling the economy?
I haven't mathed this out but I think it's okay. If dark math says otherwise though I'd accept that
New Colossus is available to liberalised monarchies as well.
Ah, I think you're correct. If I said otherwise I might've mispoken. Conceptually I associate Monarchy w/ no voting.
I've never seen a game that I've seen trade unions like poor law. they're usually the ones that get affected by the -political strenght as well
I wouldn't die on this hill, but I think they prefer it to nothing
*algorithm things*
Juice!
I've been playing an devout/aristocracy dominated, with state religion. Austria - Germany - HRE. With early birthrate bonuses from law, company and devout bonus (+15).
The pop growth is so massive that I've without exceeding infamy of 100 at any point, have reached a pop of 400 million at 1920.
Only through expansion in Europe and colonization of Africa.
My North German pops are at 80 million. Bohemia has a population of 13.5 million.
I have a pop growth each year of 1.7% which gives me about 7 million each year.
I really wonder how viable a pop growth meta is. Could we have a video? :)
After testing and looking at the modifier I think the food company is a trap tbh. Maxing pops is an interesting idea though, but it would make my computer chug and would probably be best done on Qing, even though they don't have a religious bonus.
@@generalistgaming I can confirm that it does set the computer on fire.
5:35-6:14 The mental image of Sweden reintroducing child labour because their children are too well-educated is hilarious
That's just history, baby!
I don't understand why you should care less abput tech spread if the benefits scale exponentially. Even if the cost scales linearly you should think of the benefits you dont get if you have maluses instead of bonuses to tech spread. Or am i missing something here?
It means it's cheap to just build 10% more uni's and better to be able to use bolster/supress.
Pretty much this yeah. An resource edict on a state like Silesia might be worth more than the unis needed to make up the cost of lost Innovation. I haven't mathed this out. But if you're still consumption taxing, at a certain point you'll have more construction paying for more unis and extracting money from the rich w/ consumption taxes than less taxes and unis.
feedback in the comments
Based
You baited me into opening the video by having poor laws on the preview
Jebaited. I think it's solid enough though
4:00 btw , it's real. Every modern economist would say to you , that high minimum wage doesn't provide livable wage for everyone, but instead it creates a lot unemployment, which is much worse for everyone, than just having low wages.
If that were objective fact there would be no countries/states with high minimum wages. The fact that there are means that not all economists share that view and that the topic is more nuanced than you’re letting on.
@@DovahFett yet for some reason Scandinavian countries don't have minimum wage , and rely on union contracts instead. Generally tho , you're kinda right. Unemployment is a short-term thing , generally in the long-term there would be just inflation, that gets minimum wage to not harmful for economy level
Modern Economists would tell you that if there is a monopsony market of labor then higher minimum wages won't affect unemployment or cause inflation.
I live w/ someone who has a PhD in economics and also supports raising the minimum wage, so I can tell you that there's really not a universal consensus of the sort. Although they agree that a price floor will decrease labor supply. There's a lot to unpack.
Notably that the economic principles work w/ certain assumptions of perfect competition, which aren't the case. Perfect information for example - workers are generally less informed concerning the value of their labor than employers, which could lead to wages lower than an optimal equilibrium. Also the notion that consumption drives economy and poorer people tend to spend a larger proportion of the money they receive than business owners. Or that higher minimum wage might have positive externalities that are difficult to quantify, like reduced crime.
I'm not informed enough to have strong opinion on minimum wage, but I do think there's a lot of moving parts.
I do think that you can work 40 hrs a week in the US and qualify for food stamps is insane though, and leads to things like Walmart teaching full time employees how to apply for food stamps as part of their onboarding. Taxpayers effectively subsidize corporate profit here. I think either minimum wage should be high enough that full time disqualifies one from receiving food stamps, or that the food stamps threshold should be lower. I don't know which is more sensible (I imagine minimum wage?) but subsidizing companies paying minimum wage on taxpayer dollar is nuts.