hey paul nice of you to have an episode about imam al-Shafi’i in jordan we have a dedicated college for Shafi’i fiqh and i'm one of the teachers at that college
@@malekshishani5861 Yes you follow the path of the misguided and the deviant. If you were not a deviant then you would have followed the aqeedah of Shafi and Malik and Ahmed. But you follow the path of the Jahmai and the Mutazilatie and their bastardized child Ashari
Timestamps 0:00 Start - 00:56 Imam Shafi's Significance - 01:45 Imam Shafi's Approach to Debates - 06:27 Imam Shafi's Treatise on Islamic Jurisprudence - 10:45 Scholars of Hadith vs. Scholars of Opinion - 11:41 Is Stopping Prayer a Sign of Disbelief? - 22:12 Fabrication of Hadith in Medina and Iraq - 24:48 Debate between Imam Shafi and Muhammad Hassan bani - 34:07 Understanding Contradictory Positions - 40:32 Imam Shafi's Path to Knowledge - 45:17 Imam Shafi's Early Education - 46:25 Imam Shafi's Studies with Imam Malik
Another excellent Islamic book in English. MashAllah! A prediction: By year 2100 English language will become the 2nd lingua-franca of Islam after Arabic, what Persian used to be for a millennia.
@@shahram6869 Both Arabic and English are needed. The age of Persian and Urdu language as the Lingua Franca of Islam is gone now, English is needed now.
@@hassanmirza2392 You are right. Arabic is the language of the Quran. There is no escape from that. However, Arabic is no longer the language of science as it once was and it doesn't seem like it will be once again. The Arabs have failed their language along with Islam. Any worthy Islamic scholarship should now be conducted in English. Muslims shouldn't depend on the East as its despotism only disappoints. We are to take it upon ourselves in the languages, we, as westerners, are familiar with. Islam is not an Arab or "Eastern" religion as it is so often depicted. The way to disprove that would be to fund Islamic scholarship in English and develop a Western tradition.
@@shahram6869 You are a good person, whatever you wrote is 100% correct. The Islamic scholarship for the world should be done in English. Arabs have to improve themselves, they have indeed failed Islam. This Islamist ideology is a failure of Arabs, first and foremost. According to Wilfred Hoffman, the next Islamic revival will come from West, not from 50 OIC nations. Muslims, particularly Sunni Muslims have a 'Herrenrasse' mentality. That has to go, and we have to become more intellectual and humble, like Christians. Yes, English has to be made the language of Islam! And we need a European Islamic tradition in West, Russia and Latin America. I think Cambridge Muslim College, Zaytuna College and Al-Mahdi Institute in the US/UK are already doing this.
Imam Shafe's poems are amongst the best ever. He was the one of the most knowledgable scholars in Arabic language and Hadith at his time. He also was the founder of a field called 'osool al fiqh' which cares about obtaining the rules that are used to obtain fatwa
Imam al-Shafi was the only Imam among the four who actually was from the Prophet's tribe (Quraysh) and was the only one who was raised in Makkah the Prophet's birth place. He also was the most knowledgeable in the Arabic language because he used to keep company of Bedouins whose Arabic at the time was the most pure. I love all four Imams, but Sayyidna al-Shafi has a special place in my heart may God shower his mercy upon them all.
@@kay1057 ليس غلوا بل هذا تحدث بمناقب علماء الإسلام يا جاهل، وأستطيع بحمد الله أن أذكر بعض مميزات وخصائص بقية الأئمة الثلاثة وغيرهم. والغلو هو أن تنسب مرتبة مستحيلة إلى الشافعي مثل النبوة أو مرتبة مكذوبة خاطئة، والحمد لله ما نسبت إلى الشافعي إلا ما هو مثبت في مناقبه ككونه من قريش وممن تربى بمكة وأنه أعلم الأئمة الأربعة باللغة (وإن كان البقية قد يفوقونه في علوم أخرى، فالله ميز كل منهم بميزة قد لا توجد في الآخرين)
@@T_K_R_G يحمار, هو عالِمٌ في اللغة، لكن لا يمكنك أن تقول بأنه هو الأعلم في اللغة لانة الامام مالك مولود في مدينة رسول الله ولم يفضل من العلماء هذا على ذاك وتفضيل انة من قريش هذا ليس غلو هههههه
Just found out about this channel through TikTok and I am very happy. Your TikTok prominence is very important. The things you teach and the way you deliver the message is on a very nice and understandable level. Subscribed on CZcams and my suggestion is to try to also grow more on TikTok!
Hey Paul, thanks for your extraordinary presentation of islam ☪️ through your exceptional channel blogging theology. Even from Bangladesh, I couldn't miss or avoid single episodes of blogging theology
A book called " imam shafi, A Journey through time" by Sh Allie Khalfe a scholar in Cape town, South Africa is to be launched soon on the 4th june here in Cape Time. Pls make dua book launch and sales will be a success iA.🤲
Jurisprudence was completed by imam shafi'i the student of imam malik. The story of his life and the struggle he faced for providing people with what's right is just amazing. Or the fact his mother was an genius woman herself taking her son to the right teachers like imam malik. As shafi'i Muslim, I'm proud.
In all over India-occupied Kashmir, Ustadh Paul Williams bestrides discussions like a colossus, Masha'Allah! Ustadh Hamza's case of the challenges facing us comes highly recommended : May the all-just Allah refer to you as the best of all of us on the DAY! Insha'Allah! Amen!
The opinion in the Islamic jurisprudence doesn't mean to neglect the Hadith, but it is the analogical reasoning in regard to the totality of Quran and Hadith and scholar consensus. Therefore, the opinion is restricted by the framework of Hadith and Quran and Islamic scholar consensus.
Asalamualykum to both scholars..such a delight to have Dr Hamza again ..JZK to both..really enjoyed his previous "out of the world" presentation on BT 😉❄️💙
As Salam alaykûm wa rahmatuLah ! As a Maliki I have to admit that imam Shafi'i perfected the jurisprudence... His methodology is the most complete... But I still follow imam Malik because of the fact that he is the imam of the people of Madina... BarakAllahu fik Sidi Paul al Hanifi ! Wa BarakAllahu fik Shaykh Hamza Karamali
@@clearskybluewaters You have the mentality of a sectarian jehova's witness... All four Madhabs are truthfull... The divergence between them is RahmatuLah and Mercy Cure your ego, kid
Thankyou for bringing up this amazing discussion about Imam As-Shafi'i, sir Paul. Most of our teachers and scholar here in Nusantara (Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Brunei, and the Philippines) are teaching us how we practice Islam following this madzhab
Because of Southern Yemeni traders and scholars, al-Shafi's school is still practiced by many or most in Yemen, Dagestan Chechenyia, parts of east Africa, parts of coastal India, by a large population in Egypt, Syria, Iraq. Also by some families in Hijaz, and eastern Saudi Arabia.
Thank you for sharing sir. Btw in my opinion we muslims must unity for the bigger purpouse. Like salafy had scolar, syafii har scolar, and muslims in country had oppressed giving dawah like maybe the way they spread a dawah fit to their area. we never truly know what they facing too. Like street dawah or something. The young “ulama” had more energy to dawah on the street facing hard ppl, ignorant ppl, We ass a muslims had own arean and “battlefield” we must strong and strengthen each other. Sorry for my english.
One of my favourite podcasts. I really like this channel. Can the analysis of the rationale ('illah) in the wood/thread discussion be shared if it is documented? Thank you very much!
Gentle and noble demeanor presented here... not the Islam of boys with inferiority complexes waiting for the opportunity to burn the world down. Just one note, the earliest record of that tradition on knowing the people of truth is commonly attributed to Imam Ali...thought its worth crediting the correct source. Al-‘Utbi reported: Al-Harith ibn Hut came to Ali and he said to him, “Do you see that I think Talhah, Al-Zubayr, and Aisha have united upon falsehood?” Ali, may Allah be pleased with him, said, “O rebel, you are confused! Verily, truth and falsehood are not known by the statures of men. Know the truth and you will recognize its people. Know falsehood and you will recognize the one who brings it.” Source: Ansāb al-Ashrāf 2/274 عَن العتبي قال قام الحارث بن حوط الليثي إِلَى علي فَقَالَ لَهُ أتراني أظن طلحة وَالزُّبَيْر وعائشة اجتمعوا عَلَى باطل فقال له علي رضي الله عنه يَا حار إنك ملبوس عليك إِنَّ الْحَقَّ والباطل لا يُعْرَفان بأقدار الرِّجَالِ اعْرِفِ الْحَقَّ تَعْرِفْ أَهْلَهُ واعْرِفِ الباطل تَعْرِفْ من أتاه 2/274 أنساب الأشراف للبلاذري
Just as a point of information regarding the debate between Imam Al-Shafi’ai and Imam Ahmad Bin Hanbal , the story is unauthentic as it doesn’t have a chain of narration , the person who mentioned it , Al-Subki ,lived in the 8th century AH and didn’t mention a chain. And Sheik Al-Albani said regarding it : “this story is unauthentic” Furthermore as others mentioned the content of the story itself presents very weak arguments from both sides which is unbefitting and doesn’t align with what we authentically know about the two imams and their debating skills
I have this book and I too found it a difficult read. It would be great if a scholar will use it as its source material and write a book on jurisprudence _using_ the passages in this book. Few people have mastery of the subject of Law. Even fewer can understand the theory of law (ie jurisprudence) just by reading this book
Can you bring in Reza Aslan for a discussion or make a video about his book “Zealot” which is about Jesus but from a non Religious perspective. That would be great. He is also an expert on comparative Religions.
The thing that breaks my heart whenever I think about Imam Shafi'i Rehmat ULLAAHI alehi is that he was beaten to death by the Muslims who couldn't control their anger when he was giving arguments to highlight a mistake of Imam Malik Rehmat ULLAAHI alehi whom he, himself loved and respected a lot but found himself to be disagreeing with his ruling... It just breaks my heart what huge treasure of the Ummah was laid to waste by the fannatics at 55 (a relatively young age)... A stain on the history of the Ummah... A testimony to the fact how fannaticism has been setting the Ummah back all through it's history...
I’ve first heard this episode when it came out. The debate story between Imam Ibn Hanbal and Imam Shaf’i @ 12:24 didn’t sit well with me. I've recently learned from @mshmsdin1 that the story of the debate isn’t authentic since it’s without isnad from a book by Al-Subki (who lived hundreds of years after both Imams and used the word “يحكى” Yūḥkā to start the narration which highlights its unreliability) and doesn’t even make sense in the matn(content). Ibn Othaimin discussed this, as can be found on his website. Basically, Ibn Hanbal’s mathab is that if someone becomes an apostate for a reason, they need to stop that thing they did to come back to Islam. In this case Imam Ibn Hanbal’s answer according to his Mathab should have been “To start praying again”.
I stopped reading the Quran at about 10 chapters when I was a child because I felt it was too dystopic for me. That coupled with the grandiose fear of Allah in my house (that I should fear Allah and remember all the things Allah hated). All of this made me feel sad. Still, I prayed without anyone knowing and if anyone asked if I prayed, I said no. I felt that there was a beautiful Islam, full of love and peace and joy -- which is being hidden. When I listen to the Quran - I feel that an immense whale of the cosmos - an all encompassing energy field - is trying to communicate with us, to remove our pain, heal it with love, so that we can rise, transcend and know Allah better (the all encompassing energy field). Islam will only survive by making it easier for people to follow (less talk about punishment, and more about love - how Allah loves us). Islam will only survive if we incorporate beauty in our prayers, in our rituals and our places of worship. I do not believe our Prophet wanted us to emulate him (otherwise he would have had many portraits done!). I think he wanted us to follow the five pillars. I think we should debate the contents of the Quran. I do not believe that Allah - this infinite cosmic force - ordered us to beat our wives. When was this sura written down? What is the truth of it? Are we supposed to read the quran for its meaning or its SOUND? Thank you for your blog. ❤🙏🏾
May Allah guide you and us. Amen. That is the outcome of not having scholars behind you. As the Prophet peace and blessings be upon him said, scholars are the inheritors of the Prophet's. Every scholar was praised by previous Scholars, and it goes back to At-ba'a tabeen, and then tabeen and then sahabah and then the Prophet peace and blessings be upon him and may Allah be pleased with them all. There is no scholars in the West. Read the books of the salaf. Salaf-as-salih are the best 3 generations which the Prophet peace and blessings be upon him praised, namely, the sahabah, tabeen and At-ba'a tabeen. Shahru Sunnah by imam barbahari, imam muzani, imam Ibn Hanbal and so on, rahimahullah wa ghafarallah. You have al-bani, uthaymeen, fawzan and so on. May Allah have mercy upon them and may Allah preserve those who are still alive. Amen. Said that, the verse does *not* say, beat, that is the problem when you read the translation. You can never ever translate the Qur'an, you can translate the *Meaning of the Qur'an with Tafsir* ....
There is nothing in the Qur'an that suggests that a man is allowed to beat his wife . The Qur'an enjoins good treatment of one's wife:, she is to be honoured and treated kindly, even when one no longer feels love in one's heart towards her. Allah says, And live with them honourably. If you dislike them, it may be that you dislike a thing and Allah brings through it a great deal of good. [al-Nisa 4:19] The Qur'an explains that women have rights over their husbands , just as their husbands have rights over them. Allah says, And they (women) have rights (over their husbands as regards living expenses) similar (to those of their husbands) over them (as regards obedience and respect) to what is reasonable, but men have a degree (of responsibility) over them. And Allah is All-Mighty, All-Wise [al-Baqarah 2:228] This verse indicates that the man has additional rights, commensurate with his role as protector and maintainer and his responsibility of spending (on his wife) etc. The Prophet peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) enjoined kind treatment and honouring of one’s wife, and he described the best of people as those who are best to their wives. He said:, The best of you are those who are the best to their wives, and I am the best of you to my wives.” Narrated by al-Tirmidhi, 3895; Ibn Majah, 1977; classed as sahih by al-Albani in Sahih al-Tirmidhi) The Prophet peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, spoke a beautiful word concerning kind treatment of one’s wife, stating that when the husband feeds his wife and puts a morsel of food in her mouth, he earns the reward of doing an act of charity. He said, you never spend anything but you will be rewarded for it, even the morsel of food that you lift to your wife’s mouth.” (Narrated by al-Bukhari, 6352; Muslim, 1628) The Prophet peace and blessings of Allah be upon him said, fear Allah with regard to women, for you have taken them as a trust from Allah and intimacy with them has become permissible to you by the words of Allah. Your right over them is that they should not allow anyone to sit on your furniture whom you dislike, if they do that then hit them but not in a harsh manner. And their right over you is that you should provide for them and clothe them on a reasonable basis.” Narrated by Muslim, 1218. Allah says, As to those women on whose part you see *ill-conduct, admonish them (first), (next) refuse to share their beds, (and last) hit them (lightly, if it is useful), but if they return to obedience, seek not against them means (of annoyance)* , Surely, Allah is Ever Most High, Most Great” [al-Nisa 4:34] If a woman rebels against her husband and disobeys his commands, then he should follow this method of admonishing her, forsaking her in bed and hitting her. Hitting is subject to the condition that it should not be harsh or cause injury. Hasan basri said: This means that it should not cause pain. ‘Ata said: I said to Ibn Abbas, what is the kind of hitting that is not harsh? He said, hitting with a siwak and the like. A siwak is a small stick or twig used for cleaning the teeth. The purpose behind this is not to hurt or humiliate the woman, rather it is intended to make her realize that she has transgressed against her husband’s rights, and that her husband has the right to set her straight and discipline her. Allah knows best.
You said , islam will only survive if we incorporate? This is statement is baatil (falsehood). You also said, Allah is a infinite force Cosmo? This is baatil also. If we wanna know about Allah, then we read the Qur'an, which is the word of Allah, and we go to His Prophet, becouse no one can explain the Qur'an better than the Prophet and His noble companions, becouse Allah ordered us to follow the companions. In the Qur'an, Allah says, He is above the throne Tabaraka Wata'ala, He Has Hands, Face, and so on. We affirm the meaning without negating, distorting the meaning, without saying how, without liking Allah to His Creation. Read the book of Asma wa sifaat, meaning, Names and Attributes of Allah. To know who really Allah is. Allah is The Forgiving, The Merciful, The All-seeing, All-powerful, All-Loving, but Allah is Also, The Just, The Supreme, The One who punish. The Mighty and so on. Allah has 99 Names. So, seek correct knowledge. May Allah give you a beneficial knowledge. Amen.
Sister Pasha, it’s easier to become misguided, harder to spend time acquiring depth in knowledge. And someone said it wisely: A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. May Allah swt guide you and keep us all rightly guided, aameen
As an answer to the first five minuts of sweet introduction to this dialogue I would like to say that according to the Qur'an I am rude with the disbeliev and radically against the sects in Islam. We have all the fullness of choices and fatwas in the madhabs not to follow sectarian groups political positions and Aqeedah is not a philosophical subject. We do not debate about Allah anymore. We conform ourselves to what the first generations of courageous imams wrote about HIM taking for us the huge risk of doing shirk and we shut the mouth of our egos. period. This deen is not a child's play... So when I have muslims defending sectarian groups positions against the madhabs like the so called salafis and then also pretending to philosophize about Allah because they have red books from the 14th century of a certain shaykh they call shaykh al Islam, I have no choice than being rude with them to make them realize the fitna they are spreading. This way of talking to them is the only way that wakes them up... Now we find some of them pretending to be so called Salafis but Malikis at the same time to avoid being ridiculed... I have the same behaviour with the so called shi'as who curse A'isha, and the Califate of Abu Baqr, Umar ibn al Khattab and Uthman radhiAllahu anhum... This said let's say now that I only feel love for my brothers in Islam and I can give my life for them if needed. Talking about shi'as few people know that there is a madhab that is still applicable among them which is the madhab of imam Zayid... There are actually Five valid madhabs and not only four as it's commonly said...
@@T_K_R_G I am targetting the sects and the disbeliev and the way I talk to those who play with deen as if it was a game or a philosophy is to wake them up. I am not kind anymore with those who say Allahu Akbar before cutting the throat of a muslim... We are not in the 90's anymore... We have tried kindness with them for more than 20 years and it's not effective with Khawarij takfiri mentallity... Now we know who they are and we are rude with them because we love our brothers in Islam... The so called pious salafis are the useful idiots of muslims' massive killers... They kill our brothers mothers sons and daughters by millions using these sects... There is no place for sects in Islam. Period.
3:48 HE DID NOT SAY '' you should know the people by the truth not the truth by the people " he said : " you should know the men by truth not the men by the truth " يعرف الرجال بالحق ولا يعرف الحق بالرجال
There is definitely some exaggeratiom involved in the debate quote by Imam Shafai Rahimahullah. Such quotes are often counterproductive takes away the human element from great men. A more powerfull quote would have been I never debated anybody before fighting myself and remembering the fact that truth is what I am debating for and not to win unconditionally.. I am not very eloquent but something on these lines woyld have been much effective and humane. As far as Risala and his Tafaqquh is concerned, he is The man.
Narrated Abu Huraira: My friend (the Prophet (ﷺ) ) advised me to observe three things: (1) to fast three days a month; (2) to pray two rak`at of Duha prayer (forenoon prayer); and (3) to pray witr before sleeping. Sahih al-Bukhari 1981
And some people will be claiming we shouldn't use our Aql/intellect in the deen 🤔, ( 3:13 ). This is just naïve & ahistorical, it is either the people in the past were so intelligent that what they claimed to be common sense is genius to us, or we are dumb, please just try read their works in a language you understand and you will be wondering what you are doing with your life, the book Ar Risala is basically a systematic book outlining rational principles in approaching Jurisprudence, just like the other jurists aswell, don't listen to any anti-intellectual rants you see online. May Allah guide us all
Using logic or intellect does not supersede the Quran and hadith. That is what you were told. You cannot leave or abandon a verse of the Quran and saheeh hadith just because it's against your so called logic. The words of Allah, his Prophet and companions come first, 2nd and 3rd. Your opinion or intellect if at all is sound comes a distant down this chain.
@@saidhashi2856 There you go, another anti-intellectual rant. No one said anything about contradicting Qur'an and Sunnah, the problem with you guys is that you equate rationality to being against scripture, whereas it is supposed to be a neutral tool through which every capable human being should seek the truth.
It should be mentioned that Imam shafia,e learned most of his knowledge from lady Nafisah who was the grand daughter of Imam Hassan the grand son of prophet Muhammad S.A.W.S
How can we make our lives easier? I find it difficult to be Muslim these days with so many hadiths being thrown around, and an effort to outwardly emulate the Prophet (PBUH) but not inwardly... Surely it is not so difficult to be good in my heart, good with people and love Allah.
Imaam Maalik (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: the Sunnah is like the ship of Nooh: whoever boards it will be saved and whoever stays behind will be drowned.
Shireen, let go of your affliction of proselytic Hinduism by unfollowing these these Iskon and tens of other Hindu spirituality channels. When you mix polytheism and monotheism together how do you expect to find peace?
If you look into the Salaf books you might find some very in your face things that current scholars hide like how the Salaf all condemned Abu Hanafi, and considered his followers Innovators.
just like the today.s christian ...they love and pray to Jesus...does it make them the real follower of isa as? ....clearly they are mot...not even the same people of the book as written in the Quran
The debate between al Shafii and Ahmad Bin Hanbal did not occur, you will not find it with an isnad, and majority of the salaf took the opinion that leaving salah is kufr, its the majority of later scholars who said it doesn't. also imam Ahmed doesn't say he has to say shahada but he says you have to pray to turn back to Islam. this story is disrespectful to imam Ahmed and a strawman.
يا جماعة الخير، ما أدري ليش كل عربي سلفي في مثل هذه الفيديوهات يركز تركيزا بالغا على أمور ليست بتلك الأهمية بالنسبة للموضوع وإن كانت مهمة في نفسها في سياقاتها الخاصة بها. الله يشفيكم من جنون تكرار مسائل معينة مثل حرمة الموسيقى والمعازف وكفر تارك الصلاة، مساكين وسطحيين. وربما بعض الناس من ضعاف العقول يظن أنني أسخف من هذه المسائل وأنني أصف كل المشتغلين بها بالسطحية، وهذا ليس بصحيح فإن هذه مسائل فقهية مهمة من الدين، ولكن أن تشغل حيزا دائما في الوعي والتفكير مع التكرار المستمر بحيث أنك في فيديو مثل هذا لا تنتبه إلا لهذه المسألة، لا أقول مشكلة في فكرك بل مشكلة في فكر السلفية الوهابية اللي علموك. تحدي خفيف بسيط جميل، هل يمكن أن تذكر لي سندا واحدا لك أو لشيوخك في القرآن والحديث لا يمر بصوفي أو أشعري؟
@@T_K_R_G كيف مهي مهمة؟ تشوف غريب إنه نبه على إن قصة الرسالة وأن الإمام الشافعي أرسلها للإمام عبدالرحمن بن مهدي، هنا نبه على إن القصة مشكوك فيها، لكن المناظرة ذكرها كأنها ثابتة وهي غير ثابتة وفيها إساءة للإمام أحمد وتشويه لقوله وكأنه ظاهري، والضيف الله يهديه جلس يقلل من القول بناءا على القصة الكذبية ويحسس المشاهد إنه قول شاذ ما قال به إلا ناس ما يفهموا بالفقه -هكذا المناظرة المختلقة تبين الإمام أحمد- ، لو ما تشوف فيها مشكلة فمدري ايش أقلك صراحة…
@@T_K_R_G إنت تتهمني إن ذهني منشغل بمسائل وأهو شوف مدري مين جاب طاري الأشاعرة والصوفية ليش مدخلهم بالموضوع شكله شاغل عقلك السطحي! مالهم أي علاقة بالموضوع وليس مقصدي أصلا الانتصار للقول هنا ولكن المشكلة تسخيفه للقول وإظهاره له كأنه بعيد عن الفقه والفهم العميق للنص.
@@AbdulazizNasif أتفق معك أن القول ليس بعيدا بل هو قول مشهور بين السلف وقوي في النظر. وإنما علقت بالتحديد على اعتبارك القصة فيها إساءة للإمام أحمد وليس كذلك فقد نقلها السبكي في طبقات الشافعية، والسبكي لن ينقل ما فيه إساءة للإمام أحمد، وإنما كان يكفيك أن تقول بلطف قصة خاطئة وأن الرأي بتكفير تارك الصلاة قوي، بارك الله فيكم. وأما موضوع الأشاعرة والصوفية فأحب أستفز الوهابية مثلك عشان أعلمهم أن شيوخهم مساكين وأنهم مضحوك عليهم. ما أجبت على التحدي، ممكن سند واحد لتلاوة القرآن أو للحديث من غير أشعري أو صوفي؟
Lol imagine failing so hard in history to say that Imam Ahmed is of the Ahul Hadith and not say that Ahul Hadith vs Ahul Opinion came up with Malik and Shafi and others vs Abu Hanafi. Also imagine you trying to make people think that your a scholar and mention a debate between Ahmed and Shafi that never happened and is a blatant lie on the two Imams 😂
How are you considered a scholar? The debate between Imam Ahmed and Imam Al Shafi never happened it’s a lie untrue. Also I dare you from the words of Malik or Shafi quote them saying the person that abandons prayer is still a Muslim. Do not bother you won’t find it. Because only later scholars say this.
قال الإمام الشافعي في (الأم): "(لو أن رجلاً ترك الصلاة حتى يخرج وقتها كان قد تعرض شراً إلا أن يعفو الله)" خذ يا جاهل يا صغير السن وقليل الأدب، تطعن في شيخ مسلم تعلم العلم لأنه نقل حكاية خاطئة - كما تزعم - وتعلق على الكلام بكل بجاحة وقلة أدب وأنت صغير السن (لأن كلامك يدل على ذلك) جاهل لست طالب علم (بحسب كلامك أيضا) ولو سألتك أبسط المسائل في الفقه لما أجبت! هذا النقل عن أوثق كتاب للشافعي وهو صحيح النسبة إليه قطعا، وبنصه وكلامه يقول أن تارك الصلاة قد فعل شرا ولكن يمكن أن يعفو الله عنه، وكما تعلم إن كنت تعلم أن هذا في حق المسلم المرتكب للكبائر، وأما الكافر فليس تحت المشيئة الإلهية عند الأئمة. وما عند الأئمة والعلماء في هذه المسألة كثير، ولكن شباب التيك توك مثلك خسارة فيهم العلم.
@@T_K_R_G كلامك يُظهر بوضوح ذكائك اللافت واستيعابك العميق، وعقلك الواسع النظر وحججك المقنعة. هذا يدل على قوتك الفكرية وفهمك الشامل للعربية واستخدامك السليم لها يقول الإمام الشافعي أن الشخص الذي يترك الصلاة حتى تفوت وقتها يقع في شر كبير، إذ أن تأخير الصلاة عن وقتها يُعتبر شرًا، والله يعفو عن هذا الشر إذا تاب الشخص وأقام الصلاة. فكيف بالنسبة للشخص الذي لا يصلي على الإطلاق؟ إنه أمر يُعتبر كفر باجماع الصحابة. ياعبقري الذي يؤخرالصلاة ليس مثل الذي لا يصلي. وياذكي المناظرة التي ذكرتها كانت كاذبة بحق الإمام الشافعي والإمام أحمد، فإن أصل الكلام فيها كان ركيكًا والاستدلال ضعيفًا، والحجة المطروحة بينهما كانت سخيفة. وإذا قرأت كتب الشافعي وأحمد، ستدرك أنهما بحور العلم، وهذا الكلام الضعيف ليس من أقوالهما، ولم يذكر ذلك إلا السبكي، وقد أفاد العلماء بأنها مكذوبة. والشافعي نص على قتل تارك الصلاة في كتبة، وذكر ابن كثير في تفسير قوله تعالى: {فخلف من بعدهم خلف أضاعوا الصلاة واتبعوا الشهوات} (مريم:59). ونقل الطحاوي عن الشافعي نفسه. انة يقول بكفر تارك الصلاة
This is becoming one of my favorite Islamic channels on YT, الحمد لله. 😇
This is the BEST Isalmic CZcams channel!
hey paul
nice of you to have an episode about imam al-Shafi’i
in jordan we have a dedicated college for Shafi’i fiqh
and i'm one of the teachers at that college
BarakAllahu fik Malek !
Sheik can you put your email here I would like to reach out inshallah
yes you follow his fiqh but not his aqeedah 😂
@@kay1057 the most important thing is : we are not wahhabis!
@@malekshishani5861 Yes you follow the path of the misguided and the deviant. If you were not a deviant then you would have followed the aqeedah of Shafi and Malik and Ahmed. But you follow the path of the Jahmai and the Mutazilatie and their bastardized child Ashari
One of my fav scholars of all time, just hearing his name makes me smile
Which one?
@@amirmurad-golbahari Al Shafi'i, but I'm sure I'll fall in love with this scholar too cuz of Br. Paul's based interviews
Me too ❤❤
Something very heartwarming when you say 'You're most welcome, Sir' 😊😂
On another note loving a vid on the person I was named after... Shafi was uncommon name growing up
Timestamps
0:00 Start
- 00:56 Imam Shafi's Significance
- 01:45 Imam Shafi's Approach to Debates
- 06:27 Imam Shafi's Treatise on Islamic Jurisprudence
- 10:45 Scholars of Hadith vs. Scholars of Opinion
- 11:41 Is Stopping Prayer a Sign of Disbelief?
- 22:12 Fabrication of Hadith in Medina and Iraq
- 24:48 Debate between Imam Shafi and Muhammad Hassan bani
- 34:07 Understanding Contradictory Positions
- 40:32 Imam Shafi's Path to Knowledge
- 45:17 Imam Shafi's Early Education
- 46:25 Imam Shafi's Studies with Imam Malik
@@Saber23 🤡🤡🤡
Another excellent Islamic book in English. MashAllah!
A prediction: By year 2100 English language will become the 2nd lingua-franca of Islam after Arabic, what Persian used to be for a millennia.
It's a shame it isn't already. We should be writing in English given the audience it has. The Arab world has failed Arabic. It's the time of English.
@@shahram6869
Both Arabic and English are needed. The age of Persian and Urdu language as the Lingua Franca of Islam is gone now, English is needed now.
@@hassanmirza2392 You are right. Arabic is the language of the Quran. There is no escape from that. However, Arabic is no longer the language of science as it once was and it doesn't seem like it will be once again. The Arabs have failed their language along with Islam. Any worthy Islamic scholarship should now be conducted in English. Muslims shouldn't depend on the East as its despotism only disappoints. We are to take it upon ourselves in the languages, we, as westerners, are familiar with. Islam is not an Arab or "Eastern" religion as it is so often depicted. The way to disprove that would be to fund Islamic scholarship in English and develop a Western tradition.
@@shahram6869
You are a good person, whatever you wrote is 100% correct. The Islamic scholarship for the world should be done in English. Arabs have to improve themselves, they have indeed failed Islam. This Islamist ideology is a failure of Arabs, first and foremost. According to Wilfred Hoffman, the next Islamic revival will come from West, not from 50 OIC nations. Muslims, particularly Sunni Muslims have a 'Herrenrasse' mentality. That has to go, and we have to become more intellectual and humble, like Christians. Yes, English has to be made the language of Islam! And we need a European Islamic tradition in West, Russia and Latin America. I think Cambridge Muslim College, Zaytuna College and Al-Mahdi Institute in the US/UK are already doing this.
Thanks Paul. May Allah have mercy on Al-Shafi'i's soul
Imam Shafe's poems are amongst the best ever. He was the one of the most knowledgable scholars in Arabic language and Hadith at his time.
He also was the founder of a field called 'osool al fiqh' which cares about obtaining the rules that are used to obtain fatwa
@@Saber23 who is filthy?
Imam al-Shafi was the only Imam among the four who actually was from the Prophet's tribe (Quraysh) and was the only one who was raised in Makkah the Prophet's birth place. He also was the most knowledgeable in the Arabic language because he used to keep company of Bedouins whose Arabic at the time was the most pure. I love all four Imams, but Sayyidna al-Shafi has a special place in my heart may God shower his mercy upon them all.
😂😂 this is غلو.
Ameen
@@kay1057 ليس غلوا بل هذا تحدث بمناقب علماء الإسلام يا جاهل، وأستطيع بحمد الله أن أذكر بعض مميزات وخصائص بقية الأئمة الثلاثة وغيرهم.
والغلو هو أن تنسب مرتبة مستحيلة إلى الشافعي مثل النبوة أو مرتبة مكذوبة خاطئة، والحمد لله ما نسبت إلى الشافعي إلا ما هو مثبت في مناقبه ككونه من قريش وممن تربى بمكة وأنه أعلم الأئمة الأربعة باللغة (وإن كان البقية قد يفوقونه في علوم أخرى، فالله ميز كل منهم بميزة قد لا توجد في الآخرين)
@@T_K_R_G يحمار, هو عالِمٌ في اللغة، لكن لا يمكنك أن تقول بأنه هو الأعلم في اللغة لانة الامام مالك مولود في مدينة رسول الله ولم يفضل من العلماء هذا على ذاك وتفضيل انة من قريش هذا ليس غلو هههههه
@@T_K_R_G جاهل دعك منه
Just found out about this channel through TikTok and I am very happy. Your TikTok prominence is very important. The things you teach and the way you deliver the message is on a very nice and understandable level. Subscribed on CZcams and my suggestion is to try to also grow more on TikTok!
He has tiktok?
Came frim twitter.
Hey Paul, thanks for your extraordinary presentation of islam ☪️ through your exceptional channel blogging theology. Even from Bangladesh, I couldn't miss or avoid single episodes of blogging theology
A book called " imam shafi, A Journey through time" by Sh Allie Khalfe a scholar in Cape town, South Africa is
to be launched soon on the 4th june here in Cape Time.
Pls make dua book launch and sales will be a success iA.🤲
Jurisprudence was completed by imam shafi'i the student of imam malik.
The story of his life and the struggle he faced for providing people with what's right is just amazing.
Or the fact his mother was an genius woman herself taking her son to the right teachers like imam malik.
As shafi'i Muslim, I'm proud.
Excellent interview brother Paul Masha'Allah
May Almighty Allah Bless and Reward Both of you in this Life and in the Hereafter.
Masha Allah you bring content we don't even know as Muslims
Masha Allah may Allah bless you brother and keep you guidede ameen sumameen
A fascinating lecture with a duration that fits (60 minutes).
Nice would love more video like this one , it would be great if you make some thing about imam Ahmad bin Hanbal r.a and imam Abu Hanifa r.a
In all over India-occupied Kashmir, Ustadh Paul Williams bestrides discussions like a colossus, Masha'Allah!
Ustadh Hamza's case of the challenges facing us comes highly recommended :
May the all-just Allah refer to you as the best of all of us on the DAY! Insha'Allah! Amen!
May Allah Most High reward you and give you the same!
@@BasiraEducation ,
thank you! You, too, do!
Beother paul your channel has really become a blessing ...i have really learned alot ...may allah ease your troubles and reward u in the hereafter
When Imam Syafie came to Imam Malik.. he has memorized all of Imam Malik's Muwattha'.
It is actually make Imam Malik takjub appropriately.
What a great guest, a gifted teacher
Thank you so much paul and ur respected guest....it was enjoyable to hear the story of Imam shafi. ❤ I have learned something new
The opinion in the Islamic jurisprudence doesn't mean to neglect the Hadith, but it is the analogical reasoning in regard to the totality of Quran and Hadith and scholar consensus. Therefore, the opinion is restricted by the framework of Hadith and Quran and Islamic scholar consensus.
Subhanallah very interllect❤
Majority Indonesian moslem follow imam Syafii as their mahdzab
I had this book on my shelf and الله أكبر Allah guided me to this video on the very same book!
Amazing discussion, just ordered the book. Very educational & informative content. May Allah preserve you both 🤲🏾
Thanks you for this window of reflection..We need this and new knowledge to realise the present time...
Always a pleasure to hear about the great Imams, May Allah have mercy on them all. (Abu Hanifa is the best by the way 😅)
Asalamualykum to both scholars..such a delight to have Dr Hamza again ..JZK to both..really enjoyed his previous "out of the world" presentation on BT 😉❄️💙
wa alaykum as salam wa rahmatullah, and may Allah Most High reward you.
As Salam alaykûm wa rahmatuLah !
As a Maliki I have to admit that imam Shafi'i perfected the jurisprudence... His methodology is the most complete... But I still follow imam Malik because of the fact that he is the imam of the people of Madina... BarakAllahu fik Sidi Paul al Hanifi ! Wa BarakAllahu fik Shaykh Hamza Karamali
subhanallah rejecting the truth for ... ??? idk tribalism? favoritism....
@@clearskybluewaters You have the mentality of a sectarian jehova's witness... All four Madhabs are truthfull... The divergence between them is RahmatuLah and Mercy
Cure your ego, kid
@@clearskybluewaters "[Or] of those who have divided their religion and become sects, every faction rejoicing in what it has."
30:32
@@willp.8904 True this is the sunnah of all ulemas of all over the world for 12 centuries.
@@clearskybluewaters what are you talking??? 🤦🤦
أخي لن تنال العلم إلا بستة،
سأنبيك عن تفصيلها ببيان،
ذكاء وحرص واصطبار وبلغة،
وصحبة استاذ وطول زمان.
Br. Paul is loved and appreciated by the Ummah. A gift for us all. God keep you humble and increase you in knowledge and patience.
God bless you .
Thankyou for bringing up this amazing discussion about Imam As-Shafi'i, sir Paul.
Most of our teachers and scholar here in Nusantara (Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Brunei, and the Philippines) are teaching us how we practice Islam following this madzhab
Interesting to see that honestly considering that I'm shafi'i is originally from Palestine yet most of his mazhab followers are from nusantara.
Because of Southern Yemeni traders and scholars, al-Shafi's school is still practiced by many or most in Yemen, Dagestan Chechenyia, parts of east Africa, parts of coastal India, by a large population in Egypt, Syria, Iraq. Also by some families in Hijaz, and eastern Saudi Arabia.
@@T_K_R_G you forget to mention iran.
Majority of the sunni Muslim from iran are shafi'i and hanafi.
صحيح
💯
Jazakumullah khayran
Very enlightening. This is my second video that I have watched this morning and you're making my day! Thank you.
The great imams al-Shafi'i❤
Jazak Allah khair dear bro Paul ❤Alhamdulillah
Waiting for Shaykh Hamza episode on Imam Ahmed!
This was one of the best videos I've seen in a while
Thank you, such an interesting and an easily understood topic with clear language and examples.
Perfect ❤
Thank you for sharing sir.
Btw in my opinion we muslims must unity for the bigger purpouse. Like salafy had scolar, syafii har scolar, and muslims in country had oppressed giving dawah like maybe the way they spread a dawah fit to their area. we never truly know what they facing too. Like street dawah or something. The young “ulama” had more energy to dawah on the street facing hard ppl, ignorant ppl,
We ass a muslims had own arean and “battlefield” we must strong and strengthen each other.
Sorry for my english.
One of my favourite podcasts. I really like this channel. Can the analysis of the rationale ('illah) in the wood/thread discussion be shared if it is documented? Thank you very much!
Gentle and noble demeanor presented here... not the Islam of boys with inferiority complexes waiting for the opportunity to burn the world down.
Just one note, the earliest record of that tradition on knowing the people of truth is commonly attributed to Imam Ali...thought its worth crediting the correct source.
Al-‘Utbi reported: Al-Harith ibn Hut came to Ali and he said to him, “Do you see that I think Talhah, Al-Zubayr, and Aisha have united upon falsehood?” Ali, may Allah be pleased with him, said, “O rebel, you are confused! Verily, truth and falsehood are not known by the statures of men. Know the truth and you will recognize its people. Know falsehood and you will recognize the one who brings it.”
Source: Ansāb al-Ashrāf 2/274
عَن العتبي قال قام الحارث بن حوط الليثي إِلَى علي فَقَالَ لَهُ أتراني أظن طلحة وَالزُّبَيْر وعائشة اجتمعوا عَلَى باطل فقال له علي رضي الله عنه يَا حار إنك ملبوس عليك إِنَّ الْحَقَّ والباطل لا يُعْرَفان بأقدار الرِّجَالِ اعْرِفِ الْحَقَّ تَعْرِفْ أَهْلَهُ واعْرِفِ الباطل تَعْرِفْ من أتاه
2/274 أنساب الأشراف للبلاذري
Do a video on kitabul umm next a great book
Just as a point of information regarding the debate between Imam Al-Shafi’ai and Imam Ahmad Bin Hanbal , the story is unauthentic as it doesn’t have a chain of narration , the person who mentioned it , Al-Subki ,lived in the 8th century AH and didn’t mention a chain.
And Sheik Al-Albani said regarding it : “this story is unauthentic”
Furthermore as others mentioned the content of the story itself presents very weak arguments from both sides which is unbefitting and doesn’t align with what we authentically know about the two imams and their debating skills
This man in the video claims to be a scholar 😂
I really wish that I could talk to you one day hopefully.
I have this book and I too found it a difficult read. It would be great if a scholar will use it as its source material and write a book on jurisprudence _using_ the passages in this book. Few people have mastery of the subject of Law. Even fewer can understand the theory of law (ie jurisprudence) just by reading this book
Can you bring in Reza Aslan for a discussion or make a video about his book “Zealot” which is about Jesus but from a non Religious perspective. That would be great. He is also an expert on comparative Religions.
اختلاف الامة رحمة
34:42 --- [QS2 144] What happen if they decided to pray together (jama'ah)? Should each person face a different Qibla direction?
The thing that breaks my heart whenever I think about Imam Shafi'i Rehmat ULLAAHI alehi is that he was beaten to death by the Muslims who couldn't control their anger when he was giving arguments to highlight a mistake of Imam Malik Rehmat ULLAAHI alehi whom he, himself loved and respected a lot but found himself to be disagreeing with his ruling... It just breaks my heart what huge treasure of the Ummah was laid to waste by the fannatics at 55 (a relatively young age)... A stain on the history of the Ummah... A testimony to the fact how fannaticism has been setting the Ummah back all through it's history...
Not true
@@malekshishani5861 then please elaborate…
I’ve first heard this episode when it came out. The debate story between Imam Ibn Hanbal and Imam Shaf’i @ 12:24 didn’t sit well with me. I've recently learned from @mshmsdin1 that the story of the debate isn’t authentic since it’s without isnad from a book by Al-Subki (who lived hundreds of years after both Imams and used the word “يحكى” Yūḥkā to start the narration which highlights its unreliability) and doesn’t even make sense in the matn(content). Ibn Othaimin discussed this, as can be found on his website. Basically, Ibn Hanbal’s mathab is that if someone becomes an apostate for a reason, they need to stop that thing they did to come back to Islam. In this case Imam Ibn Hanbal’s answer according to his Mathab should have been “To start praying again”.
I stopped reading the Quran at about 10 chapters when I was a child because I felt it was too dystopic for me. That coupled with the grandiose fear of Allah in my house (that I should fear Allah and remember all the things Allah hated). All of this made me feel sad. Still, I prayed without anyone knowing and if anyone asked if I prayed, I said no. I felt that there was a beautiful Islam, full of love and peace and joy -- which is being hidden. When I listen to the Quran - I feel that an immense whale of the cosmos - an all encompassing energy field - is trying to communicate with us, to remove our pain, heal it with love, so that we can rise, transcend and know Allah better (the all encompassing energy field). Islam will only survive by making it easier for people to follow (less talk about punishment, and more about love - how Allah loves us). Islam will only survive if we incorporate beauty in our prayers, in our rituals and our places of worship. I do not believe our Prophet wanted us to emulate him (otherwise he would have had many portraits done!). I think he wanted us to follow the five pillars. I think we should debate the contents of the Quran. I do not believe that Allah - this infinite cosmic force - ordered us to beat our wives. When was this sura written down? What is the truth of it? Are we supposed to read the quran for its meaning or its SOUND? Thank you for your blog. ❤🙏🏾
May Allah guide you and us.
Amen.
That is the outcome of not having scholars behind you.
As the Prophet peace and blessings be upon him said, scholars are the inheritors of the Prophet's.
Every scholar was praised by previous Scholars, and it goes back to At-ba'a tabeen, and then tabeen and then sahabah and then the Prophet peace and blessings be upon him and may Allah be pleased with them all.
There is no scholars in the West.
Read the books of the salaf.
Salaf-as-salih are the best 3 generations which the Prophet peace and blessings be upon him praised, namely, the sahabah, tabeen and At-ba'a tabeen.
Shahru Sunnah by imam barbahari, imam muzani, imam Ibn Hanbal and so on, rahimahullah wa ghafarallah.
You have al-bani, uthaymeen, fawzan and so on.
May Allah have mercy upon them and may Allah preserve those who are still alive. Amen.
Said that, the verse does *not* say, beat, that is the problem when you read the translation. You can never ever translate the Qur'an, you can translate the *Meaning of the Qur'an with Tafsir* ....
There is nothing in the Qur'an that suggests that a man is allowed to beat his wife .
The Qur'an enjoins good treatment of one's wife:, she is to be honoured and treated kindly, even when one no longer feels love in one's heart towards her. Allah says,
And live with them honourably. If you dislike them, it may be that you dislike a thing and Allah brings through it a great deal of good. [al-Nisa 4:19]
The Qur'an explains that women have rights over their husbands , just as their husbands have rights over them. Allah says,
And they (women) have rights (over their husbands as regards living expenses) similar (to those of their husbands) over them (as regards obedience and respect) to what is reasonable, but men have a degree (of responsibility) over them. And Allah is All-Mighty, All-Wise [al-Baqarah 2:228]
This verse indicates that the man has additional rights, commensurate with his role as protector and maintainer and his responsibility of spending (on his wife) etc.
The Prophet peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) enjoined kind treatment and honouring of one’s wife, and he described the best of people as those who are best to their wives. He said:, The best of you are those who are the best to their wives, and I am the best of you to my wives.” Narrated by al-Tirmidhi, 3895; Ibn Majah, 1977; classed as sahih by al-Albani in Sahih al-Tirmidhi)
The Prophet peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, spoke a beautiful word concerning kind treatment of one’s wife, stating that when the husband feeds his wife and puts a morsel of food in her mouth, he earns the reward of doing an act of charity. He said, you never spend anything but you will be rewarded for it, even the morsel of food that you lift to your wife’s mouth.” (Narrated by al-Bukhari, 6352; Muslim, 1628)
The Prophet peace and blessings of Allah be upon him said, fear Allah with regard to women, for you have taken them as a trust from Allah and intimacy with them has become permissible to you by the words of Allah. Your right over them is that they should not allow anyone to sit on your furniture whom you dislike, if they do that then hit them but not in a harsh manner. And their right over you is that you should provide for them and clothe them on a reasonable basis.” Narrated by Muslim, 1218.
Allah says, As to those women on whose part you see *ill-conduct, admonish them (first), (next) refuse to share their beds, (and last) hit them (lightly, if it is useful), but if they return to obedience, seek not against them means (of annoyance)* , Surely, Allah is Ever Most High, Most Great” [al-Nisa 4:34]
If a woman rebels against her husband and disobeys his commands, then he should follow this method of admonishing her, forsaking her in bed and hitting her. Hitting is subject to the condition that it should not be harsh or cause injury.
Hasan basri said: This means that it should not cause pain.
‘Ata said: I said to Ibn Abbas, what is the kind of hitting that is not harsh? He said, hitting with a siwak and the like.
A siwak is a small stick or twig used for cleaning the teeth.
The purpose behind this is not to hurt or humiliate the woman, rather it is intended to make her realize that she has transgressed against her husband’s rights, and that her husband has the right to set her straight and discipline her.
Allah knows best.
You said , islam will only survive if we incorporate? This is statement is baatil (falsehood).
You also said, Allah is a infinite force Cosmo?
This is baatil also.
If we wanna know about Allah, then we read the Qur'an, which is the word of Allah, and we go to His Prophet, becouse no one can explain the Qur'an better than the Prophet and His noble companions, becouse Allah ordered us to follow the companions.
In the Qur'an, Allah says, He is above the throne Tabaraka Wata'ala, He Has Hands, Face, and so on. We affirm the meaning without negating, distorting the meaning, without saying how, without liking Allah to His Creation.
Read the book of Asma wa sifaat, meaning, Names and Attributes of Allah. To know who really Allah is.
Allah is The Forgiving, The Merciful, The All-seeing, All-powerful, All-Loving, but Allah is Also, The Just, The Supreme, The One who punish. The Mighty and so on. Allah has 99 Names.
So, seek correct knowledge.
May Allah give you a beneficial knowledge. Amen.
Sounds like you live in a fairytale ngl
Sister Pasha, it’s easier to become misguided, harder to spend time acquiring depth in knowledge. And someone said it wisely: A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. May Allah swt guide you and keep us all rightly guided, aameen
As an answer to the first five minuts of sweet introduction to this dialogue I would like to say that according to the Qur'an I am rude with the disbeliev and radically against the sects in Islam. We have all the fullness of choices and fatwas in the madhabs not to follow sectarian groups political positions and Aqeedah is not a philosophical subject. We do not debate about Allah anymore. We conform ourselves to what the first generations of courageous imams wrote about HIM taking for us the huge risk of doing shirk and we shut the mouth of our egos. period. This deen is not a child's play...
So when I have muslims defending sectarian groups positions against the madhabs like the so called salafis and then also pretending to philosophize about Allah because they have red books from the 14th century of a certain shaykh they call shaykh al Islam, I have no choice than being rude with them to make them realize the fitna they are spreading. This way of talking to them is the only way that wakes them up... Now we find some of them pretending to be so called Salafis but Malikis at the same time to avoid being ridiculed...
I have the same behaviour with the so called shi'as who curse A'isha, and the Califate of Abu Baqr, Umar ibn al Khattab and Uthman radhiAllahu anhum...
This said let's say now that I only feel love for my brothers in Islam and I can give my life for them if needed.
Talking about shi'as few people know that there is a madhab that is still applicable among them which is the madhab of imam Zayid... There are actually Five valid madhabs and not only four as it's commonly said...
The Qur'anic way
{ادع إلى سبيل ربك بالحكمة والموعظة الحسنة وجادلهم بالتي هي أحسن}
@@T_K_R_G وَلَا يَحْزُنكَ الَّذِينَ يُسَارِعُونَ فِي الْكُفْرِ ۚ إِنَّهُمْ لَن يَضُرُّوا اللَّهَ شَيْئًا
فَٱخْتَلَفَ ٱلْأَحْزَابُ مِنۢ بَيْنِهِمْ فَوَيْلٌ لِّلَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا۟ مِن مَّشْهَدِ يَوْمٍ عَظِيمٍ
@@T_K_R_G I am targetting the sects and the disbeliev and the way I talk to those who play with deen as if it was a game or a philosophy is to wake them up. I am not kind anymore with those who say Allahu Akbar before cutting the throat of a muslim... We are not in the 90's anymore... We have tried kindness with them for more than 20 years and it's not effective with Khawarij takfiri mentallity... Now we know who they are and we are rude with them because we love our brothers in Islam... The so called pious salafis are the useful idiots of muslims' massive killers... They kill our brothers mothers sons and daughters by millions using these sects... There is no place for sects in Islam. Period.
@@willp.8904 which madhabs do you perfer personally?
3:48 HE DID NOT SAY '' you should know the people by the truth not the truth by the people " he said : " you should know the men by truth not the men by the truth " يعرف الرجال بالحق ولا يعرف الحق بالرجال
There is definitely some exaggeratiom involved in the debate quote by Imam Shafai Rahimahullah.
Such quotes are often counterproductive takes away the human element from great men.
A more powerfull quote would have been I never debated anybody before fighting myself and remembering the fact that truth is what I am debating for and not to win unconditionally.. I am not very eloquent but something on these lines woyld have been much effective and humane.
As far as Risala and his Tafaqquh is concerned, he is The man.
Narrated Abu Huraira:
My friend (the Prophet (ﷺ) ) advised me to observe three things: (1) to fast three days a month; (2) to pray two rak`at of Duha prayer (forenoon prayer); and (3) to pray witr before sleeping.
Sahih al-Bukhari 1981
What about numbers 5 and 6
And some people will be claiming we shouldn't use our Aql/intellect in the deen 🤔, ( 3:13 ). This is just naïve & ahistorical, it is either the people in the past were so intelligent that what they claimed to be common sense is genius to us, or we are dumb, please just try read their works in a language you understand and you will be wondering what you are doing with your life, the book Ar Risala is basically a systematic book outlining rational principles in approaching Jurisprudence, just like the other jurists aswell, don't listen to any anti-intellectual rants you see online. May Allah guide us all
You are right, but it has pre-requisites. Everyone cannot do Ijtihad/Aql/Intellect because it requires knowledge to guide the intellect.
Using logic or intellect does not supersede the Quran and hadith. That is what you were told. You cannot leave or abandon a verse of the Quran and saheeh hadith just because it's against your so called logic.
The words of Allah, his Prophet and companions come first, 2nd and 3rd.
Your opinion or intellect if at all is sound comes a distant down this chain.
@@saidhashi2856 There you go, another anti-intellectual rant. No one said anything about contradicting Qur'an and Sunnah, the problem with you guys is that you equate rationality to being against scripture, whereas it is supposed to be a neutral tool through which every capable human being should seek the truth.
@@africandawahrevival
Woe to you!!
Where do you seek truth from after Allah and his Prophet have spoken??
@@saidhashi2856 Wow, that escalated quickly. Bye, there is no point discussing this issue with you.
13:02 this debate is not authentic between Ahmad and Al-Shafi'i (correct me if im wrong)
It should be mentioned that Imam shafia,e learned most of his knowledge from lady Nafisah who was the grand daughter of Imam Hassan the grand son of prophet Muhammad S.A.W.S
This is a lie and untrue.
Paul this book that you have has a couple of errors so be careful while reading.
I would convert if someone could could explain How the moon split in two. And how did Mohammed asend into heaven on a winged horse?
How can we make our lives easier? I find it difficult to be Muslim these days with so many hadiths being thrown around, and an effort to outwardly emulate the Prophet (PBUH) but not inwardly... Surely it is not so difficult to be good in my heart, good with people and love Allah.
Stick to the basics bro.
The religion is easy for those who take it easy and difficult for those who make things difficult for themselves.
Imaam Maalik (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: the Sunnah is like the ship of Nooh: whoever boards it will be saved and whoever stays behind will be drowned.
Shireen Pasha. Trolling is not going to help you.
Shireen, let go of your affliction of proselytic Hinduism by unfollowing these these Iskon and tens of other Hindu spirituality channels. When you mix polytheism and monotheism together how do you expect to find peace?
so hanafi = people of opinion. hm yes yes this is feeding right into my preconceived prejudiced against them quite beautifully
If you look into the Salaf books you might find some very in your face things that current scholars hide like how the Salaf all condemned Abu Hanafi, and considered his followers Innovators.
just like the today.s christian ...they love and pray to Jesus...does it make them the real follower of isa as? ....clearly they are mot...not even the same people of the book as written in the Quran
Thank you for giving us an actual Salaf imam, rather than just another attempt at rehabilitating the bidah/kufr of Ibn Taymiyya again.
?
Excuse me??? Kufr of Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullah)? Fear Allah SWT!
Ashar'i malding
If you are an Ashari then you would be a kafir according to Shafi. 😂
Sufi copium
The debate between al Shafii and Ahmad Bin Hanbal did not occur, you will not find it with an isnad, and majority of the salaf took the opinion that leaving salah is kufr, its the majority of later scholars who said it doesn't. also imam Ahmed doesn't say he has to say shahada but he says you have to pray to turn back to Islam. this story is disrespectful to imam Ahmed and a strawman.
يا جماعة الخير، ما أدري ليش كل عربي سلفي في مثل هذه الفيديوهات يركز تركيزا بالغا على أمور ليست بتلك الأهمية بالنسبة للموضوع وإن كانت مهمة في نفسها في سياقاتها الخاصة بها.
الله يشفيكم من جنون تكرار مسائل معينة مثل حرمة الموسيقى والمعازف وكفر تارك الصلاة، مساكين وسطحيين.
وربما بعض الناس من ضعاف العقول يظن أنني أسخف من هذه المسائل وأنني أصف كل المشتغلين بها بالسطحية، وهذا ليس بصحيح فإن هذه مسائل فقهية مهمة من الدين، ولكن أن تشغل حيزا دائما في الوعي والتفكير مع التكرار المستمر بحيث أنك في فيديو مثل هذا لا تنتبه إلا لهذه المسألة، لا أقول مشكلة في فكرك بل مشكلة في فكر السلفية الوهابية اللي علموك.
تحدي خفيف بسيط جميل، هل يمكن أن تذكر لي سندا واحدا لك أو لشيوخك في القرآن والحديث لا يمر بصوفي أو أشعري؟
@@T_K_R_G كيف مهي مهمة؟ تشوف غريب إنه نبه على إن قصة الرسالة وأن الإمام الشافعي أرسلها للإمام عبدالرحمن بن مهدي، هنا نبه على إن القصة مشكوك فيها، لكن المناظرة ذكرها كأنها ثابتة وهي غير ثابتة وفيها إساءة للإمام أحمد وتشويه لقوله وكأنه ظاهري، والضيف الله يهديه جلس يقلل من القول بناءا على القصة الكذبية ويحسس المشاهد إنه قول شاذ ما قال به إلا ناس ما يفهموا بالفقه -هكذا المناظرة المختلقة تبين الإمام أحمد- ، لو ما تشوف فيها مشكلة فمدري ايش أقلك صراحة…
@@T_K_R_G إنت تتهمني إن ذهني منشغل بمسائل وأهو شوف مدري مين جاب طاري الأشاعرة والصوفية ليش مدخلهم بالموضوع شكله شاغل عقلك السطحي! مالهم أي علاقة بالموضوع
وليس مقصدي أصلا الانتصار للقول هنا ولكن المشكلة تسخيفه للقول وإظهاره له كأنه بعيد عن الفقه والفهم العميق للنص.
@@AbdulazizNasif
أتفق معك أن القول ليس بعيدا بل هو قول مشهور بين السلف وقوي في النظر. وإنما علقت بالتحديد على اعتبارك القصة فيها إساءة للإمام أحمد وليس كذلك فقد نقلها السبكي في طبقات الشافعية، والسبكي لن ينقل ما فيه إساءة للإمام أحمد، وإنما كان يكفيك أن تقول بلطف قصة خاطئة وأن الرأي بتكفير تارك الصلاة قوي، بارك الله فيكم.
وأما موضوع الأشاعرة والصوفية فأحب أستفز الوهابية مثلك عشان أعلمهم أن شيوخهم مساكين وأنهم مضحوك عليهم.
ما أجبت على التحدي، ممكن سند واحد لتلاوة القرآن أو للحديث من غير أشعري أو صوفي؟
ممكن سند واحد للقرآن أو الحديث من غير "مجسم"؟
مدري ايش الفايدة من هذا التحدي بس عادي نقدر نقلبه عليك
Lol imagine failing so hard in history to say that Imam Ahmed is of the Ahul Hadith and not say that Ahul Hadith vs Ahul Opinion came up with Malik and Shafi and others vs Abu Hanafi. Also imagine you trying to make people think that your a scholar and mention a debate between Ahmed and Shafi that never happened and is a blatant lie on the two Imams 😂
How are you considered a scholar? The debate between Imam Ahmed and Imam Al Shafi never happened it’s a lie untrue. Also I dare you from the words of Malik or Shafi quote them saying the person that abandons prayer is still a Muslim. Do not bother you won’t find it. Because only later scholars say this.
قال الإمام الشافعي في (الأم):
"(لو أن رجلاً ترك الصلاة حتى يخرج وقتها كان قد تعرض شراً إلا أن يعفو الله)"
خذ يا جاهل يا صغير السن وقليل الأدب، تطعن في شيخ مسلم تعلم العلم لأنه نقل حكاية خاطئة - كما تزعم - وتعلق على الكلام بكل بجاحة وقلة أدب وأنت صغير السن (لأن كلامك يدل على ذلك) جاهل لست طالب علم (بحسب كلامك أيضا) ولو سألتك أبسط المسائل في الفقه لما أجبت!
هذا النقل عن أوثق كتاب للشافعي وهو صحيح النسبة إليه قطعا، وبنصه وكلامه يقول أن تارك الصلاة قد فعل شرا ولكن يمكن أن يعفو الله عنه، وكما تعلم إن كنت تعلم أن هذا في حق المسلم المرتكب للكبائر، وأما الكافر فليس تحت المشيئة الإلهية عند الأئمة.
وما عند الأئمة والعلماء في هذه المسألة كثير، ولكن شباب التيك توك مثلك خسارة فيهم العلم.
@@T_K_R_G كلامك يُظهر بوضوح ذكائك اللافت واستيعابك العميق، وعقلك الواسع النظر وحججك المقنعة. هذا يدل على قوتك الفكرية وفهمك الشامل للعربية واستخدامك السليم لها
يقول الإمام الشافعي أن الشخص الذي يترك الصلاة حتى تفوت وقتها يقع في شر كبير، إذ أن تأخير الصلاة عن وقتها يُعتبر شرًا، والله يعفو عن هذا الشر إذا تاب الشخص وأقام الصلاة.
فكيف بالنسبة للشخص الذي لا يصلي على الإطلاق؟ إنه أمر يُعتبر كفر باجماع الصحابة.
ياعبقري الذي يؤخرالصلاة ليس مثل الذي لا يصلي.
وياذكي المناظرة التي ذكرتها كانت كاذبة بحق الإمام الشافعي والإمام أحمد، فإن أصل الكلام فيها كان ركيكًا والاستدلال ضعيفًا، والحجة المطروحة بينهما كانت سخيفة. وإذا قرأت كتب الشافعي وأحمد، ستدرك أنهما بحور العلم، وهذا الكلام الضعيف ليس من أقوالهما، ولم يذكر ذلك إلا السبكي، وقد أفاد العلماء بأنها مكذوبة.
والشافعي نص على قتل تارك الصلاة في كتبة، وذكر ابن كثير في تفسير قوله تعالى: {فخلف من بعدهم خلف أضاعوا الصلاة واتبعوا الشهوات} (مريم:59). ونقل الطحاوي عن الشافعي نفسه. انة يقول بكفر تارك الصلاة
@@T_K_R_G هؤلاء عبيد ابن تيمية ليس الا