Roe v. Wade, explained
Vložit
- čas přidán 12. 07. 2018
- The decision effectively legalized abortion across the country.
Learn more about this story at www.newsy.com/81640/
Find more videos like this at www.newsy.com
Follow Newsy on Facebook: newsyvideos
Follow Newsy on Twitter: newsy
I like it when a channel reports just the data, and doesn't bias the video with their opinions. Thank you for just giving a simple, clean, here's-just-the-data video. :)
This. So many journalists have a habit of tainting their media with their own views as opposed to just giving people the facts of the matter. People should be left to formulate their own opinions of what the media shows them, not have their opinions spoonfed to them by the media they watch. All the American mainstream media channels on both sides of the political divide are guilty of the latter.
@@EnglishLad I was thinking the other day, if news “reporters” are now “opinion” reporters; and this certainly applies to both the left and the right, can they not then be barred from locations that require press passes?
The protections put into place for the press perhaps, not be given to any organization that proves to be opinion based speculation.
I’m not saying I’m right just a thought to think about.
I answered my own question by looking up bulow v von bulow 1987. The SCOTUS at that time framed that the 1st amendment right to freedom of the press applies to “every sort of publication which affords a vehicle of information and opinion.”
So unless someone challenges that ruling I have to say I’m barking up the wrong tree.
Honestly I felt that argument was a bit of a slippery slope anyway.
Be suspicious when reports of facts use words like "effectively" or "all intents and purposes". Just say the facts, people can interpret it just fine.
@@robharmon8224 Start with the needs of human beings are you will make the correct moral decisions. The needs of women and children come first not the needs of what is just the beginnings of life. Women are the principal care givers and creators of children they should be the first to make the decisions and social polices should courage the protection of living beings not pre life as pre life between sex to pregnancy and then birth requires care and love not the withholding of care and love in service of an abstract moral ideology developed by a people to explain things they only began to comprehend.
Who's here after the leaked SCOTUS draft on overturning Roe v. Wade?
based SCOTUS
@@GuiltyNoticer PJW subscriber identified. Opinion discarded.
This aged very well.
@@physicalobject9457 lol nice coping degenerate.
Me! Sifting through lies.
Roe v Wade was based on rape allegations that roe later recanted as a lie. She also kept the baby. She then spent the rest of her life fighting to end Roe v Wade as she was pro life and did not want her name attached to such a federal law.
yea i’m trying to learn more about the topic
This was actually an informative and unbiased video. We don’t get that much nowadays.
czcams.com/video/tOcRxz3PT6Q/video.html
If you dont like abortions don't get one."
Mind your own business.
"If that's the case"
"If you dont like guns don't get one"
"If you dont wanna get pregnant don't have s_ex in the first place".
"The problem with abortion is that it steals the most innocent form of life. Don't say you fight for human rights if you don't fight for it at the very beginning,"
"If a baby has seperate DNA then a mother dependency does not rely on child support"
no
I would like to see as much passion about the children that are already on this Earth...the kids that die on a daily basis due to horrendous abuse and neglect is sickening.
i know right.. right-wing conservatives make me sick. they do nothing to advocate for the faulty adoption and foster system present in the United States, and yet here they are, advocating for a clump of cells that doesn't even know it exists and doesn't have the capacity to feel pain. and they turn a blind eye to the mothers who don't want children, who have to raise children under burdensome circumstances so that the child now has to suffer, and those who go into the adoption system and most likely undergo abuse or other excruciating circumstances. but nooo, it's a babyyyy rightttt??!? dont kill the baby!! bunch of hypocrites.
@@goofygoober6211 so you support murder huh what about this if your parents decided to have an abortion then you wouldn't be here on this earth right now you would have never even had a chance. Now I have nothing against a woman's right to choose I mean for heavens sake its you body do what you want with it but in the end when your stood in front of God on judgment day are you gonna be guilty or innocent of murder. BTW I am not a conservative nor a Democrat I am more independent than I am anything.
Fortunately I think laws are improving to protect these children.
Especially for the kids currently dying in South America and the Middle East because conservatives cheered on the war machine when those countries were innocent.
@DEEJMASTER 333 No one actually knows if the fetus can feel pain. Pain is often overlapped into neuroscience as psyche can affect the perception of pain therefore when a fetus feels pain is subjective. Perhaps it does, perhaps it doesn’t. Perhaps some do early on and perhaps some don’t until they’re born. There is not a single study that can definitely prove that a fetus can feel pain at any point, any study claiming it can is ignoring the psychological factor which can’t be detected.
Wait a minute. She filed suit in 1971, and the supreme court ruled in 1973 ... on a matter related to abortion ? Like, didn't that defeat the purpose ??
Real Talk
There is a thing called "Mootness Doctrine" in the American justice system, stating that if a controversy ends, the case falls moot and will not be heard anymore. However, in Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court modified that doctrine to rule on the case: If a right is being infringed upon only for an amount of time, which is not long enough to still have that infringement being in place, but the right naturally only stays infringed so long, the court will still rule on the case, if the infringement is likely to happen again. So while the ruling of the Supreme Court was not improtant for this specific abortion, it basically ruled on any future abortions Mrs. Roe would need.
@@masasaxd great explanation 👍
Legal processes take a long time, months or even years sometimes, and even then people can go back and reignite the whole thing
Yes that stands out for me too. I wonder what happened to her, if there is a McGorvey child now 25 years old, or if she went elsewhere for it. She must have been staunch in her stance, to bother with the heavy legal action while dealing with either youthful motherhood or the aftermath of an abortion. I wonder how things went for her, and how she is now.
I'm under the rock on a *lot* of things and have a fear of politics, so this explanation really helped simplify things for me. Thank you!
I thought Robey Wade was some black dude that was beat up by cops. Lol
@@tommyjones1357 lmao i'm glad you're taking the opportunity to educate yourself.
_really glad._ lol
so are you from iraq? or are you just a regular rock lobster? or youre patrick star?
@@tommyjones1357 hahaha
Who else is here because they have a project
sameeeeeeee
Yup 😂
I’m here for fun
Don't forget to watch the Norma McCorvey Documentary (aka Jane Roe). Don't forget to write about her life after the Supreme Court case. Don't forget to write about the fact that she regretted her involvement in the whole case and spent the rest of her life fighting to overturn the law she helped pass. Don't forget to write about the fact that conception begins at 2 weeks, and at 8 weeks that baby has it's own unique DNA. Oh... I'm rambling... I don't know if this is the best advice, because your professor will probably give you an F if you write that. But, at least keep that in your mind and spread the knowledge to others.
Who is here because they were raped?
This is real life folks...
It would be surprising to know how many people actually know what this case is actually about. Many simply take it for granted. That said, still, many use abortion as a form of birth control.
ROE VS WADE OVERTURN BROUGHT OUT THE WORST OF THE INTERNET
czcams.com/video/7QFV-S1YhuA/video.html
it's up to them how to use it, it's their body, abortion was never an easy and no-consequences option, so they know what they do
Maru the beta has spoken! Once life is created, it's not their body anymore.
It's real bad in Florida. Rape, incest, health issues are a total of 1-2%. 99-98% is simply for nonsense reasons and electives. Basically the fetus is a hindrance to most women so they abort because their too busy being selfish.
Facts bruh
Im sorry but that’s terribly sad and disgusting if thats true. Different morals and lifestyles.
Here after ACB nomination?
In my opinion; if you consent to the s*x without a condom.... you consent to the fact you might get pregnant.
Here after confirmation
@@nb4l99 that is a very shitty pro-life argument. I'm not even going to mention abortions due to rape, a child growing up to be unwanted etc.
Condoms can fail, the pill can fail, IUDs can also fail, any contraception method can fail and pregnancy cannot always be avoided. Go back to playing Roblox please
@@WhatTheCiv if it is unwanted don’t have sex at all. 3% of abortions are due to rape, and a child growing up to be unwanted, should be in the foster care system.
@@nb4l99 listen. I can understand why older people are pro-life, but young men like you? Having sex to have a baby? Come on man, I hope some day you will explore and enjoy sex, especially given the opportunity of never having a baby (whether from contraception, emergency contraception or abortions). My claim about rape was just an example, abortions mostly happen because people know they can't afford them. But still -- 3% is saying you are ok with 1.68M women globally being forced into giving birth to a baby whose father raped her. Foster care system? Lol yea ok, sure, there are some loving parents that are willing to adopt children and they grow up into usual human beings, the others stay in foster care or get taken by horrible parents and suffer for the rest of their lives. I think you know how broke the foster care system is, especially in the US so I can't see why you're defending it. Did your mom tell you to be pro abortion or something? I just can't believe that this would come out of a mouth of a teenager, unless you're ultra religious or some kind of shit like that.
I don't like abortion either, but right now, America can't even solve the problem in poverty, homelessness, etc.
Yeah okay we should kill them. What a dumb argument.
America could solve homelessness and poverty if they’d STOP sending BILLIONS of dollars and jobs to DIFFERENT countries!! We NEED to take care of AMERICA FIRST!!
Roe v. Wade was based on a LIE. Norma Leah Nelson McCorvey was Roe. She became a Roman Catholic activist and involved in the Pro-Life movement. She said being Roe was the BIGGEST MISTAKE of her life. She was NOT raped. There are so many forms of birth control now that I can’t believe abortions are still an issue. Sterilization is outpatient surgery for both men and women. The morning after pill is available without a prescription. There are A LOT of people who used to be pro-choice and many who actually worked in abortion clinics who have come out and said abortion is WRONG. Bernard Nathanson was a strong opponent to abortion. He used to do abortions. Watch his documentary, “The Silent Scream”
czcams.com/video/gON-8PP6zgQ/video.html
Murder of an unborn defensive being is a good start.
So kill the babies? Just don't conceive one then if you care so much about poverty and homelessness.
@M. Zacharias895 that’s not the point, rape exists. If someone gets raped and gets pregnant from it and either cannot have a child or does not want a child abortion is an option.
If they looked at the law, even in Progessive states, the law states anyone found killing a pregnant women can be charged with double homicide
And?
@@gabrielfraser2109 they’re acknowledging that a fetus matters as much as a human
@@thiasreynolds5028 Not really. Just proof that the two party system is messed up. The double homocide law was a conservative addition.
@@styx8975 wasn't the supreme court majority republican in 73?
Read her comment again without prejudice, perhaps you’ll understand it!
I read a book in school called Freakanomics and it explained the crime rate trending down after abortion became legal. I guess crime in America before the 70s was at an all time high due to unwanted newborns and kids ending up in foster care.
It's kind of hypocritical because we live in a country that awards women (welfare, food stamps, child support, free medical, etc.) for having illegitimate children. Also we have dozens of contraceptives made specifically for women....
So, what happened now? Crimes are way more up than the 70s
crime rate is based solely on one factor got it 😎😎
@@DSX1 Nowhere did they say that was the sole factor, and to misconstrue their argument as such to have a ‘Gotcha’ moment is foolish. But to help rephrase their statement in order to aid your failing comprehension; legalizing abortion became one factor that drastically lowered America’s crime rates, as per the book ‘Freakanomics.’
@@DSX1 cause blacks
Later on, didn't "roe" regret it and is now pro life?
Luis Trevino yes; she converted to fundamentalism and changed her mind.
Bottom line: don’t want an abortion? Don’t get one. Let women make the decision for themselves.
Yes.
@@MusicfromMarrs bottom line, don't like murder? Don't kill someone.
@@loganprasch7115 A fetus is not a person!
@@kimobrien. I was using murder as an example, but you could use any crime. If a crime is being committed, you don't say don't like it, don't do it, you make a law to protect the people who are victims of the crime. We can argue semantics of the word "person" but that won't change the fact that a scientifically defined life has just been ended.
As someone who survived child abuse, my parents were poor and didnt have the resources, information, or money to abort me and I geniunely wish they had. Oh and they never wanted children and they made sure I knew that. And to the ppl proposing that women carry children and give them up for adoption I had cousins in and out the foster system and my uncle also didnt want children. They were abused and separated from their siblings. They have little chance of getting adopted once their no longer infants. Allow ppl who dont want children to abort them and mind your own business save children from childhood trauma because we dont grow out of poverty. Were left with trauma and little opportunties to climb out of the poverty we were born into.
Another person saying abortion is superior to adoption. Huh, you people are genuinely mentally sick.
Thank you for commenting this. I never thought I'd hear/read someone flat out say they should have been aborted, it just seems too taboo.
I don't think I can ever tell my parents to their face that they should have aborted me, I don't know what good it would do now, but I've been angry at them for a long time. I doubt I will ever forgive them for thinking that the neglect they imposed on myself and my older siblings was the responsible and only choice.
Sure, save him by killing them makes sense
They're also so far removed from the original decision that they're forgetting that crime went WAY down after the ruling. Also, they complain about homelessness and social programs. They care about a life until that life ACTUALLY becomes one. Not their problem anymore (although, you know, it NEVER WAS their business to begin with).
thank you for speaking about this!! i have not seen any choice-esk commenters, and this was refreshing to see. children don’t deserve to grow up in this.
i have a project to do and i picked this case. i feel like it’s so controversial to this day with society having so many opinions on it.
Not really, is is now of how far to expand or restrict it really. It is there for eternity now, something that cannot be changed until they can literarily beam out or safely remove a fetus out a woman's body making abortion not necessary medically. There are a few related issues, but the main one in abortion is the operation and the right to it mainly.
@@Wolfen443 Incorrect. I recommend reading the actual full ruling because 100% of summarize it wrong. Not to mention Casey v. Planned Parenthood overrules Roe v. Wade in how abortion is decided.
@@Wolfen443 well eternity didn’t last that long
I have a project to do for my liberal college and they want me to have as liberal view as possible on my thesis.
Even more controversial now that it's been legally overturned. I think I remember having to do a project on THIS particular case too.
Great video explanation, quality content.
You also forgot to say how the SCOTUS in Roe Vs. Wade mentioned that this issue will need to be looked at in the future because of the lack of technological advances during those times.
Technology should be left out since their is no unlimited and free healthcare and any healthcare decisions has consequences beyond any possible good outcomes. Heath care can change the odds in a limited manner but it can not produce a 100% guarantee of a favorable outcome. The decision in Roe v. Wade should have been based upon women being equal before the law and women having the right to control their bodily functions.
@@kimobrien. we've had that right. It's called abstinence, protection from disease, birth control, etc ....
@@kimobrien. No one has the right to murder.
@@kimobrien. do you think a man should have the right to dissolve legal responsibility?
@@wattsrecords1734 I don't understand what you mean???
"I've got a great idea. How about you make abortion illegal, but if the woman is at risk of dying or has been raped, then she can get an abortion. But an abortion that isn't an emergency should be illegal. That should make at least 65 percent of the population happy.
Abortion from rape is 1% incest is .5%
@@HalleluJah337 Well you have to make the internet happy or else we will all be killed from cancel culture.
Ok but why should “parents” who made shitty choices be forced to raise a child they don’t want or otherwise give that kid up for adoption? Also, I may be wrong but I’d assume that the child sent to adoption also wouldn’t be very happy knowing they weren’t wanted by their parents. Just seems like a shitty situation for all, making a woman struggle for 9 months just to get rid of the child she just bore.
@@boom-jr8vi Well if she makes bad choices she should deal with the consequences. If she doesn't want a kid she shouldn't be sleeping around with no protection.
@@boom-jr8viAccountability/Responsibility my friend.
I’m Australian and this is making the news here. I just shake my head that this is even a debate. Women have 100% rights over their own bodies and if we give birth.
Too bad for the fetus baby they murder.
the fact this is happening to a country like the US, its like the US is becoming more similar to my regressive over-religious 3rd world country lol
Who's here in 2022, watching after they overturned this law
I don’t know why people try to control even a women’s body . A body that is not theirs . Who are y’all to say what I can and can’t do to my body. 2022 and still people wanna tell others what to do with a body that is not their own . And yes ones she is preganant it’s no longer her own body ,but then again why bring in to this world a child that a mother doesn’t want . That baby will be sent or adopted by someone we don’t really know what will do that child . The government don’t give a fuck about those kids . They don’t care about the ones alive much rather less the ones that are still not born. This is just a political thing ,this has nothing to do with saving baby’s .
0:41 does no one see this man staring into your soul right here?
Thx for the nightmares, bud
Did someone else reach the end of the video thinking that they really didn’t explain shit?
If the water is shallow enough, you can wade across. Otherwise you get a boat and row.
2020 anyone /
@@Spacespacespacewaste : 🙏🏽 /
Yup
You also follow that band? What was the name? Hell or darkness something like that?
Two steps from hell
We have the same profile picture
I ones toll a friend who was pregnant but her bf didn’t want to stay with her to have and abortion and I regret telling her that , now she has a beautiful 4yo daughter
That's awful. Why would you say that? Always choose life.
@A Girl Has No Name who tf are you. Step away this discussion doesnt concern you.
@@jameswilliams6002 it didn't "concern" you either if you wanna use that logic. It "concerns" whoever wants to reply because it is a public comment. Either way, they were correcting you.
James Williams Always support the mother’s decision. I won’t tell someone to have an abortion but I won’t tell them to not have one either.
@Emanuel Why were these two boffing?
Okay, the reason I searched for a video like this is because you cannot find a single video online telling the details of what’s going on. Can someone please explain to me why this is being overturned?
Same
What is the source of the public opinion of 1972-1973 cited in this video? TIA
Good report, the irony of this major legal event is that no one notified her of the Legal decision, and she ended up having her daughter anyway before the decision was made. I think she changed her mind about it and joined the Pro Life side even later on in life, life is full of surprises behind big stories like this landmark case.
she did she used the passing as a way to gain attention and more money. she apparently switched sides often depending on how much money she was give. while she was on her death bed she admitted that the only reason she was pro life was because she was paid more.
Is that why she is anonymously known as “Jane Roe”?
@@commandercaptain4664 , not really that is a legal term for the case I think. Since it became a class action suit like they could not just name her alone I think.
She did have her daughter .
I just looked up where in 2021 her daughter spoke about it all.
@@felaunsneed3474
She didn't have the abortion which speaks volumes and the leftist that used her to promote roe v Wade didn't try to help her either. BOTH sides admitted to using her for their own gain. As she used them. Roe v Wade was based on lies. Now it's used to manipulate. I'm pro choice with stipulations. Roe v Wade needs to go
As a woman who has had 4 miscarriages and now cannot have children I have always, and always will believe it is a woman’s right to make that decision
Yes I don’t understand y people can’t keep their opinions to themselves. Like ok u don’t agree with abortions but that’s not ur decision to make so let her do wat she wants.
The people trying to force their ideology onto others are probably only looking at the numbers and not at the reasons and the emotional struggle behind the final decision to end a pregnancy.
@@winterrain1947 regardless of emotions or numbers it’s none of people’s business. Americans need to mind their own business. People in my home country r of the ideology “mind your business and I’ll mind mine”. U don’t want to get an abort ok but I will if I want to. You aren’t religious ok but I am. Wouldnt the world be better if Americans minded their own business. America had given rise to Karens
So woman can choose to murder babies?? 🤨
@@carmencapa6945 Yes, it is "our" decision to make (not women's alone)... We vote on what is legal and not legal in this country. We have a hand in making the collective decision.
Your logic suggests that people should just be able to go whatever they want (to include murder, rape, etc.) and that society shouldn't be able to tell people what they can/can't do. That's not how things work. The population as a whole votes on what is legal and what is not.... Individuals don't get to decide what they can/can't do.
Why does nobody explain the ruling like this? It seems reasonable for each trimester and in line with Europe.
A “large clump of cells” ? You mean like you were once?
It not about whether its legal or not its about your right to aka choice to decide
Just like I have a rights not to be vaccinated
That’s a slippery slope because the left wants to legalize abortion up until delivery date!
@@rozycantsay3587 pure outlandish, ridiculous lies.
@@georgiagirl2329 erm, not even related at all.
That would be the case if abortion didn’t involve the life of another human being.
I am 5 days post op hysterectomy and I’d be lying if I said part of why I had this done was so that no one can ever tell me what to do with my body. No children, 35 years old. Truly sad what women still have to endure in this century.
What’s truly sad is that you will die alone
that is a extreme response to Dobbs
You mean being accountable and responsible. Yes it's amazing that you have to ensure the world wanting you to be a decent human and accountable for your actions.
@@OmniMale women arent getting their uterus removed due to dobbs
@@gaguy1967 are you stupid crazy or on drugs? Who the fuck said they were?
Roe - the guarantee of personal liberty and the right to privacy ...
Roe - the right to privacy as guaranteed by the First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments.
The true story of Roe v. Wade:
czcams.com/video/yIiTGFdT4IM/video.html
Thanks for the info. I always wondered why Americans were so divided and cannot have a happy medium on such a tough topic. But now I realise a solid medium was already decided so long ago yet they still argue over it.
The issue now is that back in the 70's the Supreme Court created the 3 abortion laws, and now the Supreme Court is saying, "Its not up to us to create laws, we interpret laws. So we are over turning this and sending it back to Congress to create a federal law, is it their job and role within the government." Pretty much saying they had and have no authority to have created those rules in the first place. And because Congress has not made a law on the federal level, its falling to the states to create the laws as stated by the 10th amendment. Everything here is because, Suprise Suprise, Congress cant do their job. Thats the main issue, that The Supreme Court who's job it is to Interpret the Laws that Congress made, in fact created laws. a GROSS violation of the constitution that was kept in place because of political bias in the Supreme Court Justices until now.
@@LastNameTom Finally someone articulating the same position I have; none of this is the current court's wrongdoing.
When you get to the point where you are faced with a "grim choice" that's when it's up to you.
shut up, moron. therss bitches online braqgging about it. your comment was grimmer than their view on murking their own kids.
@Brother Jay So wanting to live is sinning, got it
@Brother Jay God told me to abort... So I did
@Brother Jay when you get a tumor then god intended it.
@Brother Jaylooking at this comment reminds me that there is so much evidence that anti abortionists are religiously motivated yet they are allowed to use their religion to influence state politics. America is a contradiction.
And today, we see exactly what Christian nationalism will do at the Supreme Court level.
Good if true.
More like what having a conscience will do at supreme Court level
@@speedking7224 care to elaborate?
More details about this case from this video link czcams.com/video/yIiTGFdT4IM/video.html
Thank you I needed this.
Spoiler Alert :
They overturned it in 2022.
What does that mean
@@ScreenTimeGaming that abortions are now illegal im some states
@@ScreenTimeGaming It means abortion laws are in the hands of the states.
I've noticed everyone for abortion has already been born.
Lol
You might have noticed that fetuses aren’t a human like us so they shouldn’t be given more rights than women 💀
@@randomperson-de1rs The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-212) is a United States law that recognizes an embryo or fetus in utero as a legal victim, if they are injured or killed during the commission of any of over 60 listed federal crimes of violence. The law defines "child in utero" as "a member of the species Homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb."
@@randomperson-de1rs But they aren’t given more rights. They are given equal rights just like every human life should have. Human life begins at conception.
What does he mean when he says that in Planned Parenthood v Casey case they focused on 'road blocks'?
I like the fact that I couldn’t tell what side the narrator was taking, if he was taking a side
Who else is here because of history class?
I'm here for my work of the law career lol
health science class
And they overturned it :/
Awesome!
If a woman on her way to get an abortion is murdered and the unborn child also dies, the killer gets charged with 2 counts of murder. If that same woman instead has the abortion and is then killed, the murderer gets charged with 1 count, but why no murder count for the unborn child? Why is the baby considered a life in one instance but not the other?
lets just steralise everybody and place eggs&sperms in banks,, that way we dont have to worry about this
Because laws are decided by old a-holes not scientists. If the murder laws were defined by scientists a man who kills a pregnant woman would get either one count of murder or two depending on what stage of pregnancy it was. If it was early? One. If the woman was carrying it to term? Two counts. A fetus doesn’t fit the scientific definition of alive until later in the pregnancy and abortions happen in the early stages. Late abortions are really just induced labour.
I've always wondered about the same thing.Scott Peterson for example was charged 2 counts murder 1 for the unborn "fetus". Doesn't make sense..
if a pregnant woman is killed, you’d guess she’d keep the baby obviously unless told otherwise so the killer would’ve taken two soon-to-be lives, even tho the kid isn’t born yet. if unfit parents decide they can’t support a child for whatever reason it’s much more responsible to abort it rather then raise a child irresponsibly just for it to grow up and be a degenerate or go into foster care. if a woman is raped she’s supposed to dedicate 10 months of her life to carry your baby, many women almost bleed out giving birth, especially young girls; while you can go live your life i have to ruin myself having a baby that could’ve literally killed me and the baby is now considered the governments property? is this fr? anyone that needs an abortion and is willing to get one clearly isn’t a good fit to be a parent
Because America 's operating on pure fantasy. Look at when reality hits, they have no idea what to do. Shoot first ask questions later.
Funny how this passed in the 1970s, right as humans were conducting a mountain of studies into population growth, farming at the time wasn't able to sustain it, and we were getting movies like Soylent Green and experiments like the Universe 25 Mouse Experiment.
Perhaps the environment has more power over our thoughts then we think.
Collective consciousness
oh, i don't think it's the environment who has power over our thoughts, lol
Abortion is no one’s business except for the pregnant woman in question and her doctor.
Excuse me? What about the child
The child has heartbeat
@@lourdessaltos4620 Neither a zygote, embryo, nor fetus is a child. Potential of life does not equal the end result nor is it relevant because it does not have a say whether or not it gets continued access to the pregnant woman’s body against her consent.
She has the final word, nobody else.
P.S: a heart beat, or rather something resembling one doesn’t usually occur until 8 weeks into pregnancy.
@@2l84me8 Why doesn’t tha father get a choice. It takes two, doesn’t it?
@@makaelaischillin Because the father doesn’t get pregnant, the woman does.
A man can’t force a woman to remain pregnant against her will.
That’s why.
This video is about to get a lot of attention
The fun thing about this is that Scalia and Ginsburg both express dissatisfaction over the ruling. Ginsburg said that she liked the result, but noted that it brought years after years of unnecessary conflict.
Thank you for this video. I felt something never knowing what Roe v Wade was. This whole time I thought it was a senators full name lol
On the 26th of June 2022 Roe v Wade was overturned.
USA becoming more regressive
Women, it's your body. Put it on lock down. You got all the power. Hope you can get got the point.
These dumb ass republicans think the baby has more rights then the living women carrying it :/ shows how much we need to change as a society ESPECIALLY the south
It's not their body, it's a body inside of a body.
Here after the overturning. If you are willing, I'd like to ask you how you feel about this. I'm a teen guy and need to hear stories and opinions on this case in the current time period. Load up your thoughts and spew them down below, if you can. I'd truly appreciate it.
i think it's great, now states can ban the murder of babies
Hi, of course, I believe that this is terrible. This will cause women who have or are having miscarriages to be prosecuted if they go to the doctor for the miscarriage. And if the doctor does work on the women, they can get prosecuted and sent to jail. So now doctors can’t perform on women with miscarriages now because they are afraid they might be prosecuted later on. This effects doctors because become a criminal and have trouble being hired again after prison. And we already have a lack of doctors and terribly understaffed hospitals. If a women had a car accident and a miscarriage they would go to jail. This is utterly ridiculous. And abortion is protected by the 14th amendment but now women are being denied this crucial right. Giving birth is extremely expensive and people will definitely go into debt causing further mental and physical stress. The woman and man who have no other option to keep the unwanted child will bear the costs of the newborn and their careers will be significant delayed. (People still in school especially. ) Giving birth is a beautiful thing but forcing someone to is ridiculous and dangerous. Many women are also staying abstinent in fear of pregnancy and since plan b and such medicine is also being seen as a form of abortion will be banned as well. Hopefully abortion isn’t going to be nationwide soon or else many women will definitely be moving to other countries including me.
Sorry for the grammar and typos. I wrote this in a rush without checking.
What is the birth date of her 3 child
Roe v Wade 1973-2022 RIP
Government shouldn’t decide anything about a women’s body. PERIOD
It's not a part of the woman's body! It's a separate life!
Read Psalm 127:3-5 and Psalm 139:13-16
Mason A separation of church and state pls. That’s your religion, you made a personal choice to follow it, and adhere to its doctrines. Stop trying to force your beliefs on people using the government. If we’re going to decide everything in the government with the Bible, I suppose we should start killing people with same sex attraction for existing. And I suppose we should also kill women who aren’t virgins before marriage as well. And punish people for wearing clothes made with multiple fabrics. The same collection of books(Bible is Greek for the books) that you quote also say that people of your religion(Christians or followers of Christ) are in the world but not part of it, therefore, you and your “brethren” should judge among yourselves and let God judge the world as he sees fit.
It is a woman's right to choose and not the gov't.
No abortion should be illegal
It's a man and a women's right to choose
Seriously, a single court case does all this? Thats stupid
This is kind of how the law works.
It’s a whole different discussion now. A fetus is viable a lot sooner thanks to technological advances and we now know a lot more about the development of the fetus. It’s sad that the argument is seen as pro-life or pro abortion. There’s a lot more to consider. Abortion may have a place in certain instances but it’s hard to convince many that it should be available as a convenience or as birth control.
@@Gilang-Ramadhan If a pregnant woman or a couple do not want a child for whatever reason, they should place the child up for adoption. There are many wonderful people wanting to give them love and a good home.
@@susanb5058 That's not your call or even the state. You don't want your children to be taught Critical Race Theory either, right?
Pro-choice is not always pro-abortion, but supporting women to have a choice about her body.
@@Gilang-Ramadhan you’re correct, I don’t want anyone to be taught critical race theory. And I am pro life. We will just have to disagree.
@@susanb5058 Yes I think we just disagree.
@@Gilang-Ramadhan current state address of American politics
So base on this clip did Roe have the child and give it away. Or did she have an abortion?
Was she raped? As this is the start of most arguments regarding abortion rights. She tried unsuccessful twice and was denied. Who is the suspected father or the child, what is his take on this story? Was she involved with a married man? A lot of questions need to be answered. There needs to be a real talk about abortion laws. A lot of people have not been taught correctly to use proper protection.
She had the baby and never aborted, and spent the rest of her life in regret and trying to undo the law that was done in her name.
@@Amalie.x7fv ***and was paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to pretend to be "pro-life" -- very important fact you omitted.
Thanks for just explaining the facts
Thanks, Newsy!
This video will have a million views in 2 weeks. Wow
She really didn't want that baby. With a Mother like that...
@Hydra well she had the baby! And guess what? Her lawyer had connections that could have gotten her an abortion but she didn't even offer!
I'm watching from the United States Virgin Islands....THE WORLD'S PARADISE!!!
So did Norma have her child? She was pregnant in 69 and the court didn’t decide until 73
Its worse to have a kid brought into the world and be out in to the state custody to grow up in foster care where there are three times more likely to consider/commit suicide.
Seven times as likely to experience depression
Six times as likely to exhibit behavioral problems
Five times as likely to feel anxiety
Three times as likely to have attention deficit disorder, hearing impairments and vision issues
Twice as likely to suffer from learning disabilities, developmental delays, asthma, obesity and speech problems
Also 28% percent of kids in foster care are abused
Many can be placed in over 30 homes during their time. And the reality is alot of people see it as free money for themselves to use and not to use for the child. Theb the day the turn 18 the state cleans their hands and tell then their on their own now.
Nice logic is worse to let someone have a chance to live than to kill them instantly.
Better yet, have you imagine how these kids on foster care would have a better life, if those tax money where put in foster care istead of abortion clinics?
More than 500 million a year, that would make a huge difference in those children's lives.
Congratulations you completely destroyed yourself.
Extreme poverty is no excuse for murder.
That's right kill the babies... KILL KILL KILL
@@raynekimi2755 If the conservative fight against abortion was really about saving children's lives, then they wouldn't be also opposed to contraception. After all, the use of contraception prevents abortions.
Then maybe our tax dollars should go to creating programs that creates a more positive outcome? If you really care. Either way sentencing an innocent person to death should not even be a thing.
Right for abortion is a human right!!!!!
THANK YOU!!!!!!!!! It feels like people forget the past all too quickly - if someone doesn’t WANT a child, they WILL find a way to get rid of it. would people rather women use coat hangers again?!
Is it just Texas or all USA ?
Wait. Why was "Jane Roe" actually "Norma McCorvey"? Was Jane Roe an alias?
yes Jane Roe was an alias
her superhero name
My biological dad wanted my mom to abort me because they had separated. I sure am glad my mom was willing to choose my life over her own selfish desires and being inconvenienced.
The law was not involved in your situation and your mother wanted to raise you.
Growing up with a single mother who resented you or didn't have the resources to provide you with a decent living would be very different. Nevermind that making it illegal pushes some people to still do it but in dangerous ways.
@@ricardoamendoeira3800 👏
@@ricardoamendoeira3800 - thank you for clarifying the position of the Democrat Party and many in the "pro-choice" camp: abortion is about not wanting the unborn child. That said, why punish the unborn baby for someone else's mistake? Second making it illegal makes doing it in dangerous ways rare. You should know that at the time of the Roe v. Wade case in 1973, NARAL, under Dr. Bernard Nathanson, deliberately lied about the number of "back alley" abortions to get abortion on demand legalized. So the claim of women engaging in dangerous abortions (i.e. using a coat hanger) is completely false, phony as a three dollar bill: www.mccl.org/post/2017/10/19/the-coat-hanger-is-a-lie-why-the-back-alley-abortion-argument-for-legalized-abortion-does
@@jgehbinv you see that’s where your still ignorant if you STILL think coat hangers are the ONLY way to term an unwanted pregnancy. Drugs , Pills , overdose , Alcohol , Depression, Self Harm not with a coat hanger but many many manyyyy other ways , Razors , Sharpeners , Eyebrowutensils . PRO CHOICE IS THE BEST CHOICE !
@@ricardoamendoeira3800 so killing is a better option? Botto
Its either killing or not
As I learned in my Constitutional law in University, "enacting legal change is precisely the role of the people’s elected representatives. Legislation is for the legislature, and if the people of the United States want to create a right to abortion, they have that power. They had that power before , and if Alito’s opinion holds, they will still have that power."
Exactly this. It's been passed back to the lawmakers, that's all.
But it can take 10 years and thousands will suffer
And they can. At a state level. That's how it works. Had we followed this principle a lot for stoners wouldn't have had to do jail time.
Had we stuck to that in 1973, the issue would mostly be settled now
@@ottoweininger8156 lawmakers in the united states... aren't exactly good lawmakers -- just look at your legislature. i see more party politics in there than any legislating. the only thing Dobbs did was to remove legal protections for people wanting to challenge full abortion bans, which isn't exactly helpful in the grand scheme of things.
the woman roe was never raped.. she even stated she was not.. the story was based on a lie to get attention
US is similar to Canada.
In Canada no criminal penalties for abortion at any stage of pregnancy.
0:18
Keep abortion legal
Doesn’t matter what the government chooses . The government is for the people .so if the majority doesn’t want it the people will rally and fight it
Why make it so hard for people to adopt.I would if it didn't cost over 100,000$.
"Roe" regretted her decision & died Pro-Life. She passed fighting for Life Rather than death
czcams.com/video/MYNyaNNq8Xg/video.html
A universal woman
Thanks for the clip. She turned prolife here later but what she started had cost millions of murdered babies still today to the future until the law is reversed. Her after life however must have been scorching hot.
There is no life after death, nor is there a hell. There is life in semen, should it be illegal for a man to masturbate. You are being duped by men who think they have a god given right to dominate women.
It is not a beautiful spark, it is a gooey mess. The whole point is that women have a right to decide what to do with their own bodies. If men had to carry the babies none of this would ever be mentioned. How would you like it if a bunch of women in suits that you did not know intruded on your doctor’s appt’s. What someone does with their own body should be sacrosanct.
Good riddance! 👌🏻
I am for advocacy for unborn children; providing incentives; educational, support of other life projects, poverty alleviation etc...to encourage women to carry through their pregnancy and if they don't want the child facilitated adoption. I do not however support coercively taking the decision to abort out of women's hands. If women use abortion as a method birth control I think that they should bear some penalty.
States should set the law not the feds. Roe vs wade being struck down will allow states to ban or legalize on their own. Its exactly what everyone should want. Everyone. Freedom to chose.
Your comment is contradictory
@@d3stello157 how so. Freedom isnt just forn1 group. Its supposed to be for all people of all walks of life to come together for compromise. By making it the law of the land coast to coast the left gets what they want and the right doesnt. If banned outright federally the right gets what they want and the left doesnt. Thats not a compromise at all. A compromise is to strike it down and let the feds get OUT of the baby business, and let that power rest within the states as is intended for this government to work correctly. If 1 state bans it another can legalize it. Thats compromise. We fought the rule without representation with England once. We don't wanna do it again to ourselves do we?
@@d3stello157 not really though. That is a America is supposed to be power to the people
@@trump_won_3261 freedom to choose is pro choice! So the comment is contradictory.
Thank you Amy.
Guess who said this. Trump or Biden
"I think [Roe v. Wade] went too far. I don’t think that a woman has the sole right to say what should happen to her body.”
Biden
@@NinjaDog9123 You are good
@@Victor-it6bv He used to be pro life and Trump used to be pro choice but then they switched views
@@NinjaDog9123 Yeah 👍
The concept of human live having value is mostly religious mumble jumbo, live is no more than a natural phenomenon.
out of everything i’ve ever read, i don’t think i’ve ever agreed with anything more
Cope and seethe more, it's over
Then I guess doctors should just let people die since life has no value. Why do we even have doctors if that's the case damn. Honestly that's just a sad way to look at it, and I feel sorry for you.
@@Grace-no3sn yep, atheist are destroying the country at least roe v wade was overturned
Okay I understand everything now.. I wanted information and it was simple given right away
didnt understand anything
i’m pro abortion if its involving a child who was raped, if someone was raped in general, & if the fetus will harm or kill the mother due to medical issues. i understand the other side however if someone isnt ready to parent..but taking the chance & carrying the child to full term & later giving them to adoptive parents or the government are options. An old friend of mine told me she had an abortion on twins she was having & it did break my heart..i just think she could have atleast let them be raised by someone else 🤷♀️
The adoptive system isn’t the best…so therefore your argument makes no sense
@@Saturnlovesringsasmr
yea, the adoptive system is pretty bad, please don’t have a baby just to put it up for adoption… have a baby if you want one and are mentally and financially able to have a baby.
Allowing abortion in the first months when the fetus isn’t a living human yet gives a lot of time to rape victims to have abortion however I never understood why would anyone allow child murder after the first months of pregnancy
Nah, I'm against the adoptive system. There's so much mistreatment in that field. Think about how much those children would suffer.
@@itsame2271 Child murder? You're absolutely senseless.
You can't just expect from a RAPE VICTIM to do things right away. You don't know how it's like to be raped, apparently. You're extremely traumatized, you're suffering mentally in a whole new level and you won't be able to execute thoughts and decisions properly. Yet the penalty for illegal abortions is 15 years in prison and the penalty for rape is JUST 5 YEARS.
Child murder my ass. What if the raped woman passed away with her children in her womb, huh? The rapist should face a massive penalty because technically he killed TWO HUMAN BEINGS due to rape. That's the whole point of why abortion was created. TO PROTECT WOMEN'S BODY.
Isn't there a difference between being raped and becoming pregnant vs being reckless? I can see how abortion for the first case should be crystal clear, as it was not intented at all, whereas in the second case, it is just based on bad luck and poor decisions.
Speaking of bad luck, what hapoens if all the necessary precautions are taken and still a child is conceived? I know that must be one in a million (so to speak) but with even one case I’m sure something like this has happened. Do we just refrain from sex until marriage? Does this still come under recklessness? Just want other opinions on this matter.
If you’re here watching this video. We all know why Smh 🤦🏽♂️😤 we’re gonna have to see what happens next month with the Supreme court w/ their final Draft to overturn this Case 😮.
The unborn is not your pancreas, not your liver, not any part of you. A separate human being.
if it’s overturned i am actually going to become the joker
Bottom line: no one should be able to kill a human life. It’s a crime not a right.
It's depends if you believe in God.
Though I am a Christian I still believe that abortion is not something anyone should be able to do. I believe that women and everyone should have rights but killing another human being even if it’s a fetus I still believe that’s it’s a human life that should be cherished.
@@johndavid360 the thing is, another human being isn't being killed. it is not a human being. it's a clump of cells absent of a brain and other organs that are necessary to be qualified as a human. if abortion were the removal of babies in the third trimester, now that would be a different story. but it's not. no murder is taking place here.
What if the father of the child is against the mother getting abortion? That kid is part of the father too
Bozo
A lot of people probably did not know Roe was a medical privacy case.
Lmao not the pro lifers in the comments💀
Lmao not the pro choicers in the comments 💀
Do you realize how silly that sounds? Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and if you don't agree that's completely okay just don't be hateful towards them. This goes for both sides.
What is this “row v way” I keep hearing about.
This is the way.
Watch the video
Alexander Di Cintio oh, then I owe the federal government some money.
@Alexander Di Cintio No way.
Perfectly explained.
Well now what?