Gravity power generator based on fluid-air displacement SAMPLE TEST 2

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 7. 09. 2024
  • Gravity power generator based on fluid-air displacement
    Learn more at infinitysav.com/
    Email us to info@infinitysav.com
    ©2019 INFINITY SAV CO., LTD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
    Infinity SAV & the Infinity SAV logo are trademarks of INFINITY SAV CO., LTD., a company registered in the Republic of Korea.
    Full or partial copying of materials of / @futureenergy is permitted only with the obligatory indication of the author and direct hyperlinks on original video (not redirect or closed from indexing by search engines)

Komentáře • 632

  • @Aquanoche
    @Aquanoche Před 3 lety +16

    Don’t listen the negative reviews. You did a great job attempting something good for humanity. Don’t give up your inventions. All great inventors failed until they accomplish their objectives. Good job!!!

    • @hawks9142
      @hawks9142 Před 5 měsíci

      The difference is that his channel is just scamming people with perpetual motion machines. what he's attempting is impossible. Not in a "they'll never put a man on the moon" type impossible. It is a confirmed and proven impossibility. You can not generate energy from nothing.

  • @davidjaminsky
    @davidjaminsky Před 3 lety +12

    Great work! Consider filling the air 45⁰ or so to the "air" side so any escaping bubbles push up on the air cylinders and not working against the water cylinders. Amazing design. I know this was years ago. Just a thought.

  • @rgphomes2475
    @rgphomes2475 Před 5 lety +52

    I designed and released this 35 years ago..I was a hot tub designer. It never worked..the idea is also one of the very first perpetual motion ideas from the 1700s. The amount of force it takes to displace water is equal to its buoyancy. No gain

    • @primodernious
      @primodernious Před 5 lety +13

      yes but not to the distance of travel. if you multiply the distance times the displaced volume the energy is bigger than just the displaced volume. if you had a mile of distance of displaced volume of travel, the energy required to fill the volume would be very small compare to the energy released by the distance of travel. its true that the pressure on the bottom of the water is higher than the top but the combined force of distance till beats the required energy to fill the contained.

    • @blackturbine
      @blackturbine Před 5 lety +6

      @@primodernious not really but ok

    • @joshhayl7459
      @joshhayl7459 Před 5 lety +2

      To: RGP Homes,
      🔵 SOoooooooo........... you're calling this inventor a liar and claiming that his device doesn't work?

    • @immrnoidall
      @immrnoidall Před 4 lety

      convection generator.

    • @immrnoidall
      @immrnoidall Před 4 lety +5

      a lie involves intent. but the guy explained why it won't work. think for a minute here. if it worked ,they would be everyplace. there is no way it would have been overlooked by everyone on the planet with a brain.

  • @leszekrozen8743
    @leszekrozen8743 Před 5 lety +4

    Wiedza warta rozdawania. Autorom podziękowania ślę serdeczne . Budzimy iskierki WIEDZY w sobie by je rozdawać. Sprawdzaj, doświadczaj.Polecam .. arogancją ignorancją wspieraliśMY system.. podaj dalej. Świetny materiał edukacyjny. My Jesteś MY Zmianą.

  • @Deaf_Notes
    @Deaf_Notes Před 3 lety +6

    If anything else this thing is amazing to look at

    • @StriderAngel496
      @StriderAngel496 Před 2 lety +1

      i agree, let's put some different colored oil into and call it a lava lamp!

  • @meyramcinema
    @meyramcinema Před 4 lety +7

    Молодцы ребята!

    • @MsALDARI
      @MsALDARI Před 3 lety

      dude do yo

    • @user-ie6yg2bh5k
      @user-ie6yg2bh5k Před 3 lety +3

      Хмм, толпы лохов, требующих свои кровные за не работающие девайсы, не видел.

  • @Kart333
    @Kart333 Před rokem +2

    Отличный бтг работающий от розетки, класс!

  • @toodeep1913
    @toodeep1913 Před 5 lety +10

    What's pumping the air into the cylinders? I see there is an air tube connected to the bottom of the tank, something has got to be pushing the air in. Since it appears the top of the tank is not sealed, this is not a pressurized system, so how does the air get pushed into the water? If there is an air pump then this is less than nothing.

    • @Wolfwent79
      @Wolfwent79 Před 4 lety +8

      @Jay Bong Wrong. You cannot create energy, only transform it...usually with a loss in friction.

    • @tfbama68
      @tfbama68 Před 4 lety +1

      @@Wolfwent79 that's where you're wrong! This principle, you're overunity power is coming from the buoyancy of all of those containers. Do you not realize how much force you have to push down on a beach ball to submerge it underneath water? Use your common sense, don't you have any?

    • @Aquanoche
      @Aquanoche Před 3 lety +1

      @@tfbama68 They are coming down full of water.

    • @tfbama68
      @tfbama68 Před 3 lety

      @@Wolfwent79 push the Rockefeller funded teaching to the side, think of the force "pounds" that the air jugs a force has lifting up. Enough to turn a manual pump & a generator, with excess power to spare. How big do you want to make this creation, in relation to how big you want your generator to be.?..

    • @tfbama68
      @tfbama68 Před 3 lety +1

      👉Nicola Tesla
      Stanley Meyers
      Dennis Reed
      Troy Reed
      Paul Pantone
      John Christy & Lou Britz
      Joe Newman
      John Bedini
      Howard Johnston
      Richard Clem
      Daniel Dingel
      John Searl
      Thomas Ogle
      Dennis Lee
      Eric P. Dollard
      Tewari
      Adam Trombly
      Paramahamsa
      Dennis Klien
      Parendev
      McKenzie
      Muammer Yildiz
      WAKE UP PEOPLE !
      SLAVES N0 M0RE !
      Edward Snowden, Julian Assange

  • @troyhayder6986
    @troyhayder6986 Před 2 lety +1

    I'm came up with an idea of using the natural cycle of water in a glass skyscraper with a thermally insulated swimming pool at the bottom..water evaporates...rises..condenses on an upsidedown metal conical roof and runs off into a funnel and generates electricity all the way down...if you use transparent solar panels you could even get it running at night...

  • @AdrenalineCrew
    @AdrenalineCrew Před 2 lety +1

    I was just thinking about this. I knew CZcams would find someone who tried it.

  • @jameselliott9397
    @jameselliott9397 Před 5 lety +9

    After thinking about your machine I came up with the idea of a simple water wheel. Except in reverse. The wheel being submerged and air fed to the impellers. Also if the unit was built in a round enclosure the water would also act as a flywheel.
    Another idea would be to have a submerged rotor in a spiral but cupped down to trap air. Kinda like a spiral staircase.
    If I just had the means to try all of my ideas. Magnets, gravity, pressure, I know there is a way to achieve over-unity. Or maybe better said, the conversion of natural energy to useable energy.
    Bless anyone who try’s to step outside the box. Not trying to defy physics, but to exploit the unknown and unexplained.
    The.earth has been spinning for thousands of years. This is proof enough to me that there is an answer to our free energy quest. Don’t overthink and don’t forget that physics, and conservation of energy is correct within the boundaries that it is taught. However, no one has a calculation for as an example, the random movement of a double pendulum.

  • @SINANOZYOLDAS
    @SINANOZYOLDAS Před 6 měsíci

    For 15 years, I have been working with angular resonance and I am ready to do the electricity generation project together with investors who agree to make an official protocol. Everything will be done openly after the signatures are signed.

  • @anilkumarsharma1205
    @anilkumarsharma1205 Před 4 lety +5

    use a ten meter square surface area, it's receive ten thousand kg force exerted by atmospheric pressure, so make a simple series of expansion and contraction like we do in barometer sensing needle turned due to cylinders changing its shape due to atmospheric pressure changing
    if we do it on more ten kilometres squares surface sensing device then it receive millions of trillions of tonnes per second changing atmospheric pressures difference's, so we got very cheap technology for energy production

  • @user-yx5yn3hc5f
    @user-yx5yn3hc5f Před 7 lety +14

    показали что компрессор потребляет 133 ват. Ну да, все крутится, журчит и булькает, а где показания с генератора?

    • @serg1000gtr
      @serg1000gtr Před 3 lety +1

      А зачем? о но ж не работает в реальной жизни.

  • @Blacksheepishot
    @Blacksheepishot Před 8 lety +1

    Congrats you're on the right track now simplify. Pyramid up the design now and bring your device to a full potential.
    Goodluck!

  • @NovikovOleksandr
    @NovikovOleksandr Před 8 lety +14

    Если бы еще телефон при съемке повернули горизонтально, было бы лучше!

  • @user-tk6dk8bf1k
    @user-tk6dk8bf1k Před 7 lety

    Добрый день!
    Моё имя Евгений. Я из России
    Я очень впечатлён вашими успехами!
    Желаю вам всяческих благ и удачи!
    Good afternoon!
    My name is Eugene. I'm from Russia
    I am very impressed with your progress!
    I wish you all the best and good luck!

  • @ronniestanley9090
    @ronniestanley9090 Před 5 lety +1

    I dont understand why everyone is saying that this wont work. So, your saying that a fishtank air pump wouldnt have enough power because why? Feelings? You said? When the canisters are full they move through the water freely. When the airpump fills them at the bottom they create bouyancy. Are you saying that it cant make more power than a fishtank pump can use? Im not saying that something like this could be used to power an all electric house but, to say that it doesnt work because it wont work, because it cant work, isnt really an arguement. Its a good thing Tesla didnt listen to the peanut gallery!

  • @DeryckThompsonChasingtheDream

    THIS IS THE 3RD FREE ENERGY VIDEO I HAVE SEEN THIS GUY DO, HE MUST BE VERY BRILLIANT TO FIND 3 WAYS TO CREATE FREE ENERGY WHEN THE WORLD CANT EVEN FIND ONE. OR HE MAY BE SCAMMING YOU!

  • @mikepict9011
    @mikepict9011 Před 2 lety +1

    Seem like the correct design would be two tanks , in an hour glass shape , inside a frame allowing you to spin it with a come along crank , with a generator pump in the middle.

  • @mbaqader
    @mbaqader Před 8 lety +11

    its really great work

  • @KarasCyborg
    @KarasCyborg Před 2 lety +2

    Wonder if this would work with methane bubbles from a composting pit to clean the methane gas. And then capture the methane to burn as fuel for an air pump turbine.

  • @kennethharrison9409
    @kennethharrison9409 Před 3 měsíci

    It is a great idea, but the only thing that I wonder is how do you prevent corrosion? That is, if any of the parts are metal.

  • @kimiya40
    @kimiya40 Před 6 měsíci

    Congratulations and sorry !
    The energy that the compressor consumes to produce compressed air is much more than the energy produced by this device
    This can be a good idea for areas that have compressed air underground
    😊❤

  • @mymagicsigns
    @mymagicsigns Před 5 lety +9

    So when the tube that lets in air is in the half down position is open and when in the up position is closed? What kind of valve system did you use? This is amazing!

  • @carinamazcunanclaret8374
    @carinamazcunanclaret8374 Před 7 lety +5

    Wow its cool!!!

  • @warsakwarsaker4670
    @warsakwarsaker4670 Před 5 lety +2

    Аэрацию воздухом сделать надо справа где погружаются цилиндры, т. е, как можно больше и очень мелких пузырьков подать надо, это уменьшит сопротивление при погружение, соответственно КПД при подъёме увеличится. Повторить не трудно, главное доработать.!

    • @user-uq7bh2gh4r
      @user-uq7bh2gh4r Před 4 lety +1

      Походу верно было бы. Плотность воды с микро пузырьками уменьшится.

    • @LeaderGP
      @LeaderGP Před 3 lety +2

      а как это они без особых затрат вкачивают воздух в ковши?

    • @iAlfizik
      @iAlfizik Před rokem

      на доли процента

  • @madtscientist8853
    @madtscientist8853 Před 3 lety +2

    That is kinda cool never thought of that

  • @Boxman-GG
    @Boxman-GG Před 2 lety

    This should be our answer to global warming

  • @angelblanco3055
    @angelblanco3055 Před 8 lety +1

    Уважаемый Андрей Словодян (не знаю если фамилию правильно написал), вам надо исправить время подачи воздуха. Надо измерить время подачи воздуха, которое управляется давлением воздуха в пневматическом резервуаре. Так как видно на 2:05 мин. крутится по часовой стрелке и подача воздуха начинается намного до нижней точки. Необходимо сделать так, чтобы подача воздуха закончилась в 45 мин. в циферблате и начиналась всегда после 30 мин. на шкале циферблата.
    Примите как пример распределитель стартового воздуха в дизелях. Управляете временем подачи воздуха и следите за результатами!
    Удачи Вам и Вашим коллегам!

  • @gilsonescadasartesanaisdel940

    Muito bom. Só não tem nada a ver com gravidade, mas sim com pressão e densidade

    • @konstantinekuzminsky4944
      @konstantinekuzminsky4944 Před 2 lety

      Nothing in common? And in my opinion, all this is a secondary effect on the basic gravitational field.Someone really likes to watch modern "fiction" here.

  • @mareesteer7045
    @mareesteer7045 Před 3 lety +3

    LOL. This elaborate fish-tank pump requires a constant INPUT of energy to run.

  • @duck0027
    @duck0027 Před 4 lety

    nice. it should power the world perhaps.

  • @davidswimsr.8343
    @davidswimsr.8343 Před 5 lety +6

    Brilliant! I am very impressed and interested. Please continue!

  • @boyetz88
    @boyetz88 Před 3 lety

    This will be a nice conversation piece..

  • @amiromerx
    @amiromerx Před 2 lety +1

    This is an Archimedes perpetual motion machine based on hydrostatics☝️ Perpetuum mobile EXISTS👍

    • @StriderAngel496
      @StriderAngel496 Před 2 lety +1

      if you ignore the fact that you need an air compressor, powered by way more electricity that this can produce... SURE...... I wonder, are people marveling at this just kids or have none of you ever passed 5th grade?

  • @MrPalianytsia
    @MrPalianytsia Před 7 měsíci +1

    Сколько энергии требуется на заполнения воздухом нижней емкости? Покрываются этизатраты работой по выталкиванию емкости вверх?

    • @230020703
      @230020703 Před 4 měsíci

      Конечно нет. В закрытой системе не может быть энергии больше, чем в начале.

  • @user-vs5oy3zt1j
    @user-vs5oy3zt1j Před 4 měsíci

    работа = сила × путь
    A = Fs, где А - работа, F - сила (архимедова) выталкивания поплавков и s - пройденный путь. За единицу работы принимается работа, совершаемая силой в 1Н, на пути, равном 1 м.
    Для компрессора N = A/t, где N - мощность, A - работа, t - время накачки поплавка.
    Итого Nt= η Fs , где η - КПД устройства, а s - высота колонны. Отсюда η = (Nt)/(Fs) где F - из среднего объема воздуха в поплавке.

  • @dallasmann6845
    @dallasmann6845 Před 7 lety +1

    there's also companies looking into harnessing the power of evaporation, which is constant in all environments and has higher potential than even gravity. especially in humid hell holes like Florida

    • @volleyballschlaeger
      @volleyballschlaeger Před 7 lety

      Dallas Mann power plants use evaporation to run the Generators.

    • @t.m.w.a.s.6809
      @t.m.w.a.s.6809 Před 6 lety

      Harder to Barnes that though I think, but I’m interested in where that idea goes

  • @dannysharp8724
    @dannysharp8724 Před 6 lety +1

    You could use wind turbines to run the air pump 👏 nice invention

    • @blackturbine
      @blackturbine Před 5 lety +1

      But then what's the point of this thing
      Why not just connect wind turbines directly

    • @BarbnGrill
      @BarbnGrill Před 5 lety

      Yep

    • @ryangriffith1344
      @ryangriffith1344 Před 4 lety

      @@blackturbine Perhaps capturing wave motions could be useful... this device is silliness.

  • @bt4291
    @bt4291 Před 3 lety +2

    Been drawing this and many like it for years. Would like to swap ideas. Can make this actually function a generator.

  • @alexmanzanero
    @alexmanzanero Před 7 lety +19

    More like bouyancy than gravity

  • @seektruthnow00001
    @seektruthnow00001 Před 2 lety

    Maybe another way, get say 20 basket balls or hollow cylinders, then use a air lock setup, to feed them into an upsidedown submerged bucket conveyor with say 20m of lift, hooked up to a generator, voila, free energy. ?? The small amount of water that drops into the airlock is then pumped 20m up using small electric pumps. The amount of energy that is needed to pump water lost from the air lock fill would be small compared to the energy made by water displaced by the boyancy of the ball dragging a generator chain 20m , especially if the airlock is sized with close tolerances there would be very little water to pump back into the top of the tank. You could even use a revolver design, and use speed and close tolerances to minimise water leaks. I like this idea, coz any fabrication shop could start making them , given the basic necessary materials and equipment.

  • @primorec17
    @primorec17 Před 17 dny

    Add more vacuum amd magnets it will be even stronger.. Try one with rotation

  • @MuhammadSaeed-qn1cf
    @MuhammadSaeed-qn1cf Před 2 lety +2

    Great work I m really impressed, how much electricity generated ?
    How much cost at these model ?

  • @wasserdrucker6227
    @wasserdrucker6227 Před 4 lety +2

    Nice craftwork with plexiglass. Can you design a smaller version like 30cm tall and complete made of plaxiglas or plastic and sell it as fishtank toy for 20 dollar on aliexpress? Maybe with a Motor, so it can run in reserve and you do not need any compressor?

    • @SquidInkUK
      @SquidInkUK Před 4 lety

      It would be like a Ferris wheel for fish. At least people would know what they're buying!

    • @ronnielsen8404
      @ronnielsen8404 Před 2 lety +1

      You would loose power using a motor counter intuitive,,the thing there not accounting for is the energy there gonna loose to spin a fly wheel or gearing to actually produce energy

  • @milanrytir4219
    @milanrytir4219 Před 2 lety

    Je to dobrý, spousta peněz a práce na výrobu, jde to udělat daleko snadněji levněji a dá se to koupit již stovky let. Nic nového pod sluncem.

  • @-30h-work-week
    @-30h-work-week Před 10 měsíci

    Calculate for one barrel. How much energy does it produce in one spin? Next, see how much energy is required to displace the water out of the barrel while at the bottom of tank. I don't see where you'd get the advantage from.

    • @vmas29
      @vmas29 Před 10 měsíci

      Just add the time prispective to this calculations. I said this before and I will say it again. Why you want to calculate for 1 bucket in a close system like this in the video.? Just calculate the input energy, for this case air compressor and the output kinetic energy from the shaft. if is not obvious enough that at any specific point of time you collecting energy from all the buckets that is still filed with air.NOT only the 1 you just fill with air. yes you have heat (friction) losses but is enough?

  • @overunityinventor
    @overunityinventor Před 2 lety +1

    When the pump fills air in the tank and then when pumps gets disconnected from the tank, why not water goes inside the empty tank again?

  • @eddyblanco2841
    @eddyblanco2841 Před rokem +2

    Que pasa con la fuerza que necesita el sistema para sumergir esos recipientes en el agua? Se supone que hay resistencia debido a la presión de aire que estos contienen dentro. A mi parecer el sistema quedaría en equilibrio dinámico

    • @clovisaguiarenergia
      @clovisaguiarenergia Před rokem

      Está é a verdadeira máquina de Arquimedes....se fosse totalmente arredondado sim você estaria com a razão,mas você está equivocado ou completamente te bêbado do juízo falar que está máquina não funciona.

  • @kfl611
    @kfl611 Před 2 lety +4

    An explanation on what I'm looking at would be nice. What is happening/ How does it work? How efficient is it? Where will it be used?

    • @cat1stevens
      @cat1stevens Před rokem +1

      your looking at drums of transparent plexi-glass, connected to a chain, which rotates the chain, as every drum on the lower end get a spray of pressured air, so that every drum, on one side is with air, and all drums on the other side is filled with water, and this way the forces of air under water is pressing up, and gravity pulls the drums filled with water down: so its a way of producing work/energy using the forces of uplift, and gravity ! : Try to fill an oil_barrel with air on the bottom of the ocean, and se how fast it raises to the top of the sea :)

    • @Tag-Traeumer
      @Tag-Traeumer Před 8 měsíci +1

      @@cat1stevens The energy com from the hidden Air compressor, not from gravity.

  • @unit411
    @unit411 Před 4 lety +1

    if electrolysis was used to generate the gas inside the cylinders then burn the hydrogen as fuel should make surplus energy.

  • @valveman12
    @valveman12 Před 5 lety +3

    How is the air-filled when the containers are underwater? Seems to me that this would be very lossy since it takes power to fill the containers with air.

    • @ahhlam1642
      @ahhlam1642 Před 5 lety +1

      i have the same feeling too....
      it looks like the air is pump in to the container.....

    • @Bennu3924
      @Bennu3924 Před 5 lety

      Facepalm 🤦‍♂️. The man holding the camera is not underwater, would you agree? Pay attention, as the cylinders near the bottom the air flows into the obvious valve into the cylinders that is the same air the camera man is breathing. The deeper the set up, the more powerful the output.

    • @Bennu3924
      @Bennu3924 Před 5 lety

      Honestly I'm seriously getting close to answering with one word ... magic. Look closer before asking the obvious please

    • @ahhlam1642
      @ahhlam1642 Před 5 lety

      @@Bennu3924 I can't understand....the air from outside just flow into those small container ?

    • @valveman12
      @valveman12 Před 5 lety

      @@Bennu3924 So you think this works by powering itself? If you do...then you don't understand why this is not possible.

  • @philstat100
    @philstat100 Před 6 lety +2

    WOW!!! I understood every word spoken.

  • @SirOscargener
    @SirOscargener Před 8 lety +3

    I have made one similar to this working on the same fluid-air displacement principle way back on the early 70's. It drove a small electric generator to produce a 220 volt ac power to light up my room. It was discontinued due to financial strains.

  • @XAlucardmoonX
    @XAlucardmoonX Před 3 lety

    Absolute beautiful

  • @BoHolbo
    @BoHolbo Před 2 lety +1

    Perpetual motion machines don’t exist. It simply isn’t possible to build a device that can output more energy than what is put into it. It’s not real!

  • @lukystrike8276
    @lukystrike8276 Před 2 lety +1

    what you see at the beginning is the energy consumed by the compressor?

  • @airpractic
    @airpractic Před 8 lety +14

    красиво. вот если бы эта хрень вырабатывала лехтричество в плюс....

    • @angelblanco3055
      @angelblanco3055 Před 8 lety +3

      Вырабатывает, не беспокойтесь!

    • @airpractic
      @airpractic Před 8 lety +5

      ну... а где это видно? то что всплывают поплавки это видно а то что вырабатывает нифига не видно....

    • @angelblanco3055
      @angelblanco3055 Před 8 lety +3

      airpractic потому что смотрится глазами и видно мозгами!

    • @airpractic
      @airpractic Před 8 lety +11

      Ну нет данных о самозапитке данного чудного девайса. Пока работает всё от розетки. И будет работать от розетки. А вообсче - завораживающе всплывают поплавки. Можно на них смотреть бесконечно как на огонь, воду и как другие работают. Но счёт за потреблённую энергию этим двигателем никто не отменял

    • @nkcvetkov
      @nkcvetkov Před 8 lety

      Нет это устройство построено не как генератор РОШ от него нет прибыли(( .Во сколько обошлось его строительство ?

  • @thisscene5857
    @thisscene5857 Před měsícem

    The speed has to be higher and it has to be a closed loop system of at least 100 bars

  • @1WhiteScientist
    @1WhiteScientist Před 3 lety +1

    Daha ağır bir sıvı .tuzlu su yada civa kullanılsa güç çıkışı artırılabilir.

  • @HisHigherness8472
    @HisHigherness8472 Před 3 lety +1

    Add some blue dye, and there's your warp core engine

  • @lorenzo42p
    @lorenzo42p Před 6 lety

    if you're not claiming free energy, neat project, looks fun.

    • @t.m.w.a.s.6809
      @t.m.w.a.s.6809 Před 6 lety

      I actually made one myself after seeing this video, so I will claim it myself...
      FREE SNERGY BABY!!!

    • @BarbnGrill
      @BarbnGrill Před 5 lety

      proof

  • @Zuluzec
    @Zuluzec Před 6 lety +11

    С таким же успехом можно поставить ветрянной генератор который питает вентиляторы,а те дуют на ветряки ))) зачем так сложно колба вода цилиндры)))?!!!

    • @weldermusk8860
      @weldermusk8860 Před 5 lety

      лампа противогаз У тебя на противогазе нет извилин. Смотри это видео до конца. czcams.com/video/WXBvgnWwKDk/video.html

    • @wmonk5642
      @wmonk5642 Před 4 lety

      @@weldermusk8860 Ну эта индийская хрень точно работать не может - они подняли воду, потом эта вода спустилась - в чём тут выхлоп? Воздух хотя бы таскать туда-сюда не надо, такой водяной столб ещё может иметь какойто смысл

    • @weldermusk8860
      @weldermusk8860 Před 4 lety

      W Monk Я согласен что с воздухом проще, тем более при высоте 10 метров мы получает разницу давления 1 атм, и это играет роль , так как расширяясь воздух увеличивает подьемную силу, здесь же у не индийцев а каких то филипинцев судя по алфавиту возможно у них вода по трубе с горного ручья или другая халява.

  • @TheBowersj
    @TheBowersj Před 3 lety +2

    This does appear to be powered by an air pump, am I correct about this? It takes energy input to keep it going right?

    • @mareesteer7045
      @mareesteer7045 Před 3 lety +1

      Yes, this elaborate bath toy requires a constant INPUT of energy to keep it moving.

    • @ronnielsen8404
      @ronnielsen8404 Před 2 lety

      Doesn't the air pump get powered by the gearing spinning borrowing energy from the energy of the air lifting tubes

    • @mareesteer7045
      @mareesteer7045 Před 2 lety +1

      @@ronnielsen8404, No Ron. Perpetual motion is not possible. It's just a joke.

  • @volleyballschlaeger
    @volleyballschlaeger Před 5 lety +1

    This one looks nicer than the perpetual motion machine by rosch ag.

    • @johnbiden2834
      @johnbiden2834 Před 5 lety

      ...and even better for cheating the audience.

  • @overunityinventor
    @overunityinventor Před 2 lety +1

    The longer is the height of the unit the more power it generates but the consumption of the air pump remains same.

    • @StijnDeWitt
      @StijnDeWitt Před rokem +2

      No it does not. The air will need to be pressurized to a pressure higher than that of the water column.
      Imagine blowing air into a car tyre (pressure approx. 2 bar). It won't work. You need a compressor that delivers higher pressure.

    • @kisskaspeik5220
      @kisskaspeik5220 Před 9 měsíci

      @@StijnDeWitt пусть платят) так работает экономика биткоина)

  • @mysterycomment1553
    @mysterycomment1553 Před 4 lety +1

    The air pump is plugged in. So the air is the fuel. Plus every single bubble you see is wasted fuel/energy. Someone might eventually think of the right machine, but if you have it plugged into the grid then this isn’t it.

    • @skackbuddy
      @skackbuddy Před 4 lety

      I have it

    • @iron-farmer
      @iron-farmer Před 3 lety

      Why cant these things be hybrid? Use a little solar to do a few switchs or actions here or there to keep a magnet motor or other running?

  • @user-qj9qw9fd5q
    @user-qj9qw9fd5q Před 3 lety +1

    더 획기적인 방법 아는데

  • @eduardschlosser6924
    @eduardschlosser6924 Před 8 lety +3

    Es wäre ganz einfach nachzuweisen ob das Gerät funktioniert oder nicht.
    Man müsste einfach alle Elektronik entfernen und den Kompressor direkt mit der Kette von den Auftriebskörpern betreiben.
    Dann starten man den Prozess per Hand.
    Wenn es wirklich funktioniert dann müsste der Kompressor mit der Zeit mehr Luftmenge produzieren als für den Antrieb benötigt wird. Es würde sich kennzeichnen damit das mehr Luft in die untersten Körper gefüllt wird als reinpasst.
    Leider erbringt NIEMAND diesen Beweis.
    Bis dahin gilt.....
    NOT WORKING DEVICE or
    Warning fraud

  • @riccs93
    @riccs93 Před 4 lety

    Very beautiful for being a ridiculous perpetuum mobile

  • @scottwatts4897
    @scottwatts4897 Před rokem

    better off tapping a local creek or rain water with a 1607 water wheel. It' cant produce energy in any quantity to sustain it's use.

  • @respektshevi9378
    @respektshevi9378 Před 6 lety

    Браво! 🖒🖒🖒Bravo!🖒🖒🖒

  • @lolboy8374
    @lolboy8374 Před 7 lety +1

    it looks nice

    • @ryangriffith1344
      @ryangriffith1344 Před 4 lety

      it's very pretty... but for what? factories with big tanks of compressed gas to get rid of is about it.

  • @AndrewKFletcher
    @AndrewKFletcher Před 7 lety +1

    I imagine a very tall cylinder as high as a skyscraper, could generate a lot of power from those bubbles of air.

    • @t.m.w.a.s.6809
      @t.m.w.a.s.6809 Před 6 lety +2

      It is possible though, because all that torque from all those air pockets trying to rise would push so hard compared to the small amount of power needed for that little air pump. But I’m open to discuss what you think the problem with this is.
      Note: gravity is a constant input witch pulls the water down so that the air floats, we don’t know where the energy of gravity is coming from so gravity is line energy from nothing, that’s why I see this as possible

    • @RustyShakleford1
      @RustyShakleford1 Před 5 lety

      T.M.W. A.S. Thank you very much for expanding on this in multiple comments and what was successful for you I very much appreciate it. It will help any other who try to take on this endeavour

    • @BarbnGrill
      @BarbnGrill Před 5 lety

      not knowing how gravity is produced or solar doesn't make it free. You also forget cost of materials, labor, friction

    • @panospapadimitriou3498
      @panospapadimitriou3498 Před rokem

      @@BarbnGrill wow.. you mention solar/.///// with solar help same principal at night is going to work better as an improvement with more efficiency
      .. what a great thought or even better with thermal banks if solar isnt everyday possible

  • @Langkowski
    @Langkowski Před 2 lety

    It does look pretty

  • @MartinSoria
    @MartinSoria Před 5 lety +2

    super ingenioso, pero no comprendo como se crea la energia

  • @JASalam
    @JASalam Před 4 lety +1

    Hermosa su maquina

  • @clovisaguiarenergia
    @clovisaguiarenergia Před rokem +1

    Muito bom😮

  • @theaquariancontrarian3316
    @theaquariancontrarian3316 Před 9 měsíci

    How about designing this where only one side is submerged in water? You'd eliminate at least 40% of the friction.

  • @Archin-dn4bp
    @Archin-dn4bp Před 6 měsíci +1

    real gravity engine on my channel

  • @chasehowse-willard9182
    @chasehowse-willard9182 Před 5 lety +1

    Yea because when you hold a container in air it fills with water and when you hold that same container under water it magically fills back up with air. Kinda backwards

  • @sandorkurucz2989
    @sandorkurucz2989 Před 2 lety

    Úgy érzem az ötlet csodálatos.Sajnos azonban nagyon sok energiát nem lehet kivenni a rendszerből.Nincsenek korrekt mérési eredmények,ami igazolná a rendszer jó hatásfokú működését.A kérdés miért nem terjed a rendszer futótűzként?Ha igazán érdemleges plussz energiát lehetne vele előállítani,akkor már sorozatban gyártanák!

  • @md.nazmulislamreza6141
    @md.nazmulislamreza6141 Před 2 měsíci

    Hv seen it. Don't understand why air is used here. Seen so many like this. What about my simulation ?

  • @targabill
    @targabill Před 2 lety

    Looks cool, Need numbers, Watts to produce Air, Watts out ?? Gain or loss??

  • @theanthillfromknow.theanop3960

    I saw this idee long ago from you guy but never ever here again. Like al the projects on the internet. So after i think serveral years now. I good use it al ready but nope. I like the way of thinking realy great. So where can i see of it work out. The big company a thrilled in this. ( If it works !!!)

  • @Alpha-vr4de
    @Alpha-vr4de Před 5 lety +1

    I hafe similar Idee ten years ago. I improved this in 3 different ways if you want writing me I wil give you the plans.

    • @AndresMDiaz-us8jc
      @AndresMDiaz-us8jc Před 5 lety +1

      Hello, I Want know more about your idea, greetings from Colombia

    • @Alpha-vr4de
      @Alpha-vr4de Před 5 lety +1

      Ok but we need another kind of communication. And sorry about my bad English. 😅

  • @woobykal68
    @woobykal68 Před 2 lety

    Correct me if im wrong but it would take alot of energy to pump the air down to the bottom of the tank.

  • @kurtdobson
    @kurtdobson Před 8 měsíci +1

    Won't work...

  • @Fireball_Roberts
    @Fireball_Roberts Před 6 lety +7

    The maximum amount of energy you can extract from the buoyancy of one bubble is going to be equal to the energy it took to pump the bubble in.

    • @t.m.w.a.s.6809
      @t.m.w.a.s.6809 Před 6 lety +2

      Not really, just make the thing taller so that there are more air locked cups, making more lift to make more torque on the motor... more power... boom

    • @scienceminded
      @scienceminded Před 6 lety +8

      @@t.m.w.a.s.6809 Merely making it taller causes the pressure at the lowest depth to increase, making the force required to pump air at that depth proportionally greater. The result is no net excess of energy, only equal to or less than unity.

    • @t.m.w.a.s.6809
      @t.m.w.a.s.6809 Před 6 lety

      Actualy no, as long as there are no holes for the water to enter, there is no reason for it to be harder to pump the air in. Let me entertain your belief there though, let’s say it does take more effort and energy because of the tube running down the water tank...
      Well, just make one hole at the bottom where the pump is right there and pumps the air through that without being submerged in water, simple.
      Can you tell me anything wrong with this new solution?

    • @klavesin
      @klavesin Před 6 lety +2

      The matter is not in submerging the pump, the matter is that the pump is displacing the water that is under the pressure at the bottom. The the taller the reservoir the more pressure the pump has to overcome, simple.

    • @t.m.w.a.s.6809
      @t.m.w.a.s.6809 Před 5 lety

      what would it need to overcome? I get that there is more water pleasure at the bottom, but if you blow air into the bottom instead of blowing it in at the top, then it is not harder to blow the air in, the water pressure pushes down with the weight of all the water above it, but an air bubble rising is a natural thing, that wont be stopped by water pleasure, the pump just introduces the air into the tank without much force needed as the energy needed is just keeping the water from coming through the other direction. if an air bubble is at the bottom of the ocean, it does not sink from the water pleasure, it still rises because its lighter, and making an air tight seal in that pump is all that's needed to reduce the amount of effort needed.

  • @hillsilk5
    @hillsilk5 Před 3 lety

    This is so genius

  • @FOREXEACODER
    @FOREXEACODER Před 8 lety +1

    Hi guys,
    You show only 218V x 0.613A = 133.8 Watts
    But you do not tell us what power into the air-pump.
    If the power 133.8 Watts was to run the air-pump
    then what was the power out of your system ???????
    Thank for show you invention.
    Oscar
    PS: If you look on the pdf book from Patrick Kelly P.4-35
    then you will see 50 kilowatt, 250 kilowatt and 1 megawatt O/P
    Inventor: James Kwok
    US 2010/0307149 A1
    On page 4-43 that is close system like to your system
    designed by Patrick.
    Version: 29.3 Release date: 27 Jan 2016
    I know you will not answer, but that is OK.

  • @RK1FX
    @RK1FX Před rokem

    What if we used gasses of fermentation ?

  • @1OutOf8Billion
    @1OutOf8Billion Před 7 lety +2

    In the process of making energy you waste energy so there is no gain unless your machine can generate more electricity to replace that of the air pumps electric usage

    • @t.m.w.a.s.6809
      @t.m.w.a.s.6809 Před 6 lety +1

      It can make more energy, because if it’s not enough already, then just make it taller so that it has more air pocket cups, causing more torque, giving more power

    • @ryangriffith1344
      @ryangriffith1344 Před 4 lety

      The machine has loss due to frictional heat into the environment at some level, so unless you can eliminate all friction you are gonna have a net loss.

  • @Carl-Gustav-Hamilton
    @Carl-Gustav-Hamilton Před 8 měsíci

    Was Zeigt der Leistungsmesser an Bezug oder Einspeisung?

  • @SandwipRoy
    @SandwipRoy Před 3 měsíci

    Go ahead

  • @miklospalffy3011
    @miklospalffy3011 Před 2 měsíci

    How is the project running now?

  • @bitt3rror_ed
    @bitt3rror_ed Před rokem

    Rest in peace Slabodian, they took down another great inventor

    • @RK1FX
      @RK1FX Před rokem

      Wait, what !?!?

    • @bitt3rror_ed
      @bitt3rror_ed Před rokem

      @@RK1FX he is dead, burned down in the house in south korea believe or not fire startet from aircon scheme and alarm didnt work

  • @blazeinthesky130
    @blazeinthesky130 Před 2 lety

    That’s awesome

  • @user-ki3qr2rm7i
    @user-ki3qr2rm7i Před 4 lety +1

    Еще интересно обьем воздуха в баках литров по 5 у вас ? Чтоб понять сколько кг тяга идет