EVERY WAR In Russian History
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 09. 2023
- #possiblehistory #ph
If you like the content please like, comment and subscribe, it helps smaller channels like mine to get noticed!
If you want to support the channel you can go to my Patreon or become a member! You will get early access to video's and will be allowed to suggest priority video subjects!
/ possiblehistory
Feel free to follow or join our social media platforms:
/ possiblehistory
/ possiblehistor1
/ discord
/ possible_history0
Possible Extra's a channel where we do not necessarily history related stuff, like podcasts and more!
/ @theobserverph
Data Animations made with flourish.studio
Most of our music by Beta Records. He's great, check him out!
Link: goo.gl/peHHCX
A lot of other music by Kevin McLoad. The Copyrightfree Music Creator
/ kevinmacleodarchive
Several additions
1) The wars of Rus', like Rus' itself, are the direct predecessors of Russia and should also be included here. This includes unification campaigns from Staraya Ladoga and Novgorod, campaigns against Byzantium, wars with the Pechenegs, Khazars and many others.
2) The name Muscovy is foreign and was not used either then or in Russian historiography. It would be correct to call the Principality of Moscow. Then the Russian tsardom and then the empire.
1) The wars of Rus’, like Rus’ itself is absolutely not the direct and only predecessors of Russia and shouldn’t be included here. Rus' directly influenced the formation of all three modern East Slavic nations; however, this does not mean that the “largest and most famous” of these nations is a direct continuation of the state of Rus', no matter how modern Russia tries to convince everyone of this. It’s political statement, not a historical one. So the beginning of this video quite correctly shows what kind of wars Russia has waged in its history.
2) The self-name “Russia” is also somehow foreign, it is literally the Greek version of the pronunciation of Rus', and modern Russia seems to have no problems with this. The name “Muscovy” was simply assigned to this political formation in Western sources, like, for example, the name “Persia” or “India”, the peoples of which did not call themselves that. It is clear that the Hellenized version of the name of the state-forerunner of homeland sounds much more respectable than some kind of “Muscovy”, but I personally didn’t particularly notice in the textbooks of Russian historiography the more “correct” self-names of some East Slavic or Central Asian peoples, such as “Georgians”, who call themselves "Kartvels" and who never called themselves “Gruzines”, therefore, the presumption of the correctness of the self-name sounds doubtful.
@@unbridled_rage 1) The wars of Rus’ and its history also extend to the peoples of Ukraine and Belarus, and are not excluded from these countries, but it is the peoples and not the states. And the continuation of Rus’ as Russia is based not on the fact that Russia is the largest of them, but on the fact that Russia preserved the ruling dinasty of Rus’, the dominant faith of Russia and was a state that united the former lands of Rus’. At that time, such processes stopped due to the entry of these countries into the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. The Russian principalities, although they temporarily lost their full independence, did not cease to exist and eventually united into a single state at that time that considered itself a continuation of Russia. It is this version that is most common all over the world, including the Western one. You may be convinced of some other, but the fact is that it is the new versions that are most shaped by political motives. In addition, according to these versions, there are no serious scientific papers, or even any information at all.
You may well have a different opinion, but if you do not have proof in the form of scientific articles published in scientific journals or international historical conferences proving that Russia is not the heir of Rus’ or it is another state, then I will not comment on further statements concerning this, since it is precisely such a conversation that is politically conditioned and cannot be resolved by scientific methods
2) And again, your comments come out of the consideration that I just don't like the name of Muscovy, although there is nothing humiliating in it, but it is incorrect, at least because of the fact that this foreign term denotes several different states at once, the Moscow principality and the Russian tsardom, and in general, the Russian lands under the rule of Moscow and not a specific state. In this video, this name figures as a full-fledged name only for the Moscow Principality, without taking into account the context. With regard to your statements about the names of other countrys, there are different reasons for each of them, related, for example, to the one who presented the history of these states to the public, which still had to be searched for, and if some state does not agree with how it is called or was called, it can send a diplomatic request on this occasion. For example, India now wants to be called Bharat, but until it does, it will remain India.
@@user-ru6yl9zr2z 1) Let's start with the fact that Rus' has never been an integral state, it is, roughly speaking, a confederation of principalities which, in turn, included a certain number of different Slavic and other tribes that made up the main population of the country and were ruled by the main prince in Kiev. This state was finally and irrevocably fragmented after the Mongol invasion of Rus' 1237-1241, which divided the history of all the peoples living on its territory into before and after. The population of the northwestern part of the Rusines territories was influenced by the Balts and became part of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, forming a new identity and culture, but retaining their faith and their own language. The population of the southwestern part for a long time maintained independence as part of the Galician-Volyn Principality, having received recognition from many European states and the Pope as the only heir of Rus, largely preserved the culture of Rus, literature and the dominant religion (like all others, in fact), and after destruction this state for a long time retained its culture and language being part of Poland, the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, and later the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, having gone a long way from centuries of oppression and assimilation to the formation of a unique culture and political system based on democracy.
The northeastern population of Rus came under the strong influence of the Golden Horde and adopted a lot from it, starting from state institutions, to some extent the structure of society and some state symbols, creating a completely new cultural and ethnic community, a state system and, ultimately, a hypercentralized a state with a new center in Moscow after the victory over the collapsing Mongol Empire, which had claims to all Rusines lands under dubious pretexts and eventually conquered a significant part of them, but almost no principality became part of it voluntarily, this is the path of expansion and assimilation and not “reunification” ". All three nations in the future have a common ancestor in the person of Kievan Rus, but certainly not Russia is a direct continuation of that state, it is certainly older and in many ways more powerful than the others, but is completely different in its state structure and other factors from both Rus' and other states that emerged from Rus'.
2) Well, I was probably mistaken in my judgment on this particular issue, I apologize.
As for the next question, I meant that Russia really doesn’t like being called incorrectly, but at the same time it absolutely does not respect the desire of other peoples to call themselves authentic, this also applies to the history of some peoples, especially those that were previously under its influence . For me, this is a sign of imperialism and hypocrisy, which is also spread by Russian citizens, which, apparently, you are.
@@unbridled_rage 1) You have again given statements that are not based on any serious scientific foundations, and some are also known to be incorrect. I think if you had the slightest desire to understand the issue, you would have found processes that you consider as a counterargument, a clear proof of the course in Russia of precisely such state and nationally unifying processes that were then characteristic of the states that formed in the Middle Ages around the world and Europe in particular.
But I doubt that you have the desire to take seriously something that contradicts the views that you have now, so, as I said in the previous comment, I will not comment on why you are wrong.
2) Russia respects the historical desires of peoples, but often people confuse the desire of countries, framed in the form of documentaries, for only being formed in the people. Almost all countries of the world have distorted the names of a country and if countries want other countries to call them differently, then I believe they need to make a little more diplomatic efforts than none
@@unbridled_rage The name "Rus" itself comes from the Scandinavian tribe that came to rule the Slavs in the 9th century. This tribe founded the ruling Rurik dynasty. Where the Rurikovichs ruled, there was Rus'. In the Middle Ages there were no nationalities; in the Middle Ages the dynastic principle was in effect. All lands and peoples living on it belonged to a certain dynasty. The last Rurikovich to rule in Russia in the 17th century was Ivan Shuisky. Therefore, Russia is the direct heir of Rus'.
Please do a version of austria on this! From margrave to dukedome to archdukedom to empire to republic!
...to the third reich
Good idea
also doubles as a history of the Habsburgs as well lol
Every successor state of Austria...@@EmperorRyuTokugawa
Also Austria is the one who caused both the world wars
Why not Novgorod stablishment? That when Russia was created after all.
Because people love to think that russia existed only when moscow was founded. Its a weird logic
No it wasn't when Novogorod created that Russia was too, its funny how when people say Moscovy formed Russia "its a weird logic" but when you say Novogorod just was created its "the real Russia"
@@sprintfoxy1240 Muscovy (more like Vladimir, but there's that) gathered the broken apart pieces of former Russia, reuniting it once more. Moscow didn't create Russia, only reinfocred it.
@@dimas3829 Russia was never united to begin with, its like saying "When Austria was emperor of the HRE Greater Germany was unified" its just wrong.
@@sprintfoxy1240 oh, yeah, divided Rus plundered Eastern Roman Empire twice and ensured trade agreement and forced Romans to convert slavs into Christianity ,sure. All that trully divided, if you say so.
Why did you ignore the whole pre-Mongol period? Novgorod and Vladimir were among most important principalities
He ignored it because of Rus' was Ukrainian state, look at the symbols
@@snertmoskalyam No one heard about Ukraine it that time, Ukraine as nation was established only in XIX age
@@snertmoskalyam The symbols are made up by historians, Kievan Rus is the predecesor of Russia, and in some sort of Belarus and Ukriane as well, but more for the Russians
@@AmadoDom why? Proves?Look: what was the stamp of Volodymyr the Great? Ukrainian trident. Where was the capital of Rus'? In Kiyv. Look at the small birch planks with text near the Novgorod- clear ukrainian! Look at the inscriptions at Sofia the Kyiv- also clear ukrainian! Also look at the historical path: most of Rus' history Kyiv was the center, and what we now call "russia" even weren't included in Rus'.
Volldymyr-Suzdal' principality army pillaged and almost destroyed Kyiv in 1169. If Rus' is predecesor of russia, would the most "russian" prince destroy the capital of Rus'?
Zaliss'a("russian") principalities were the first to collaborate with mongols, de-facto leaving Rus' , meanwhile the other parts of Rus' bravely fought against mongols. Would most "russian"( in that time- muskovyt)(historically too, if you watch the video you must know that principality of Moskva was russian ancestor) principality, the predecesor of russia first fully leave Rus', who are too predecesor of russia?
True Rus', the richest principalities were on UKRAINIAN lands, there ukrainian nation lived, lives, and will live.
The Danylo of Galych, prince of Galicia-Volyn, get crown of the Rex of Rus' from Roman Pope, look closely: not "yarlyk" from mongols, like muskovy, crown from Pope.
He united almost all south Rus', what we now call Ukraine and parts of historically ukrainian territory in russia and belarus.
Again, let's look on the map: Rus' preserved only on the south, on ukrainian lands, in north there are mongol puppets.
All the way to XX century ukrainians continued to call themselves "Rusins" or "Rutens", russia started to calm itself russia only after Petr I rule in 1721.
So, we can made conlusion: Rus' is not russia, but Ukraine, even more: because of ukrainian lands in Rus' was much richer, and because of cultural differences we can made even more shocking conclusion: Zaliss'a ("muskovyt", "russian" lands) was colony of Rus'-Ukraine.
@@snertmoskalyam Symbol of Ukraine is a Khazar tamga. Rus was founded by Ryurik in Novgorod. Ukraine was unknown and Kiev was not in Rus yet
Не совсем понятно, почему отсчет начат с такой поздней даты. Первая столица Руси - это Ладога, туда и были призваны родоначальники первой правящей династии. Рюрик еще сидел в Новгороде, потом Олег пришел в Киев, и Киев стал на долгое время столицей в домонгольской Руси. После этого столица была во Владимире, и только после этого она переместилась в Москву. Автор не включил огромный пласт истории. И, кстати, слово "Московия" используется только в польско-литовских источниках.
Киев не был столицей Руси т.к не было никакой единой Руси до торжества Московского княжества, была масса княжеств которые имели в том числе междоусобные конфликты.
Тезис киевская Русь исторический и озночает просто Русь до татаро монгольского ига не больше и не меньше.
@@user-ro1fh6zh7hбыла сначала Новгородская земля, затем, после переноса столицы в Киев, Киевская Русь, и только после этого в 1132 году она разделилась на отдельные княжества, враждовавшие между собой
@@dinozavrizm4534 они всегда меж собой враждавали , единое централизованное государство появилось только при торжестве Московского княжества .
@@user-ro1fh6zh7h тем не менее они были связаны, князья переезжали из одного города в другой по лествичному праву
But... why Russian history starts with Moscow? Why not Novgorod, Kyiv, Chernigov, Polotsk, Smolensk?
Because Moscow unified Russia, i mean it would be based to count all of them into Russian victories but gotta pick one and its better to take the unifier
В западной историеграфии так принято, не забивай голову. Они то с наследниками римской и китайской империи до сих пор разобраться не могут. Куда уж им до нас😊
Here the countdown begins with the formation of statehood, not the people
@@sprintfoxy1240well rurik also unified russia so start from that
@@McHallel no he didn't it was Ivan that unified Russia
It's ridiculous to compare with the USA. For the States, everything is much easier. It was enough for the states to win the war for liberation from England, and that's it, there is no more threat. It is ridiculous to consider Mexico, or, later, Canada, as a threat. The rest of the wars are the beating of weak states by the Western Coalition. While Russia was developing surrounded on all sides by a large number of other powerful states and empires. Under US security conditions, the historical percentage of Russia's victories would be 2.95+
Yes, for Russia to survive such a tremendous threat daily is a miracle on its own....and to maintain such an empire despite so many ethnicities and subjects...
@@JK-qn9qrsomeone threated russia? Look at it wars. 90% is russian agression against somebody
"oh wow I'm gonna disregard one of the main advantages of another country because I find it unfair even though it isn't"
Ah yes. Caucasian and siberian warlords
Very stronk
@@hugosenshida999
Lol. How about the European warlords*? Were they trash too?
you should do this for china, persia, rome, ottomans, egypt, austria, england, france and prussia/germany
Sir, this is a wendy’s
Yes no no yes no yes no yes yes😊
Bro called England a country 💀
@@that1countrieschannel When it was ps he was probaly referring to The UK as well and British empire
@@that1countrieschannelbro really doesn't know history
Thank you, this was very interesting! One on China next would be my suggestion, however I would be excited to see whichever one you release next if you decide to do another series like this!😌
Hello! It’s a good video, but Russia has had many more conflicts since its inception, like the campaigns of Svyatoslav
The history of Russia does not begin with the history of Moscow. If you start, then it should be from Novgorod Rus
Russia helped Abkhazia and Ossetia to secede, helped those people who will fight against Russia in Chechnya (Shamil Basayev greetings). Russia had too many problems of its own. If we judge this way, then Russia also helped Georgia, an agreement was signed where Russia transferred part of the weapons, weapons from the collapsed Soviet army
How quickly they missed the armed conflict in Transnistria. In fact, thanks to the Russian army units that were in Moldova, the armed conflict was not allowed to flare up more strongly
2008 Georgia was the first to attack South Ossetia, but for some reason this fact is forgotten. Georgian, whether by accident or not, fired at Russian peacekeeping troops
What an idiotic section. NATO is now supporting Ukraine, which is currently at war with Russia. It is believed that NATO is at war with Russia. If not, then why did they add the Armed Conflict in Transnistria and Abkhazia to this video? Are the Soviet campaigns in Afghanistan in the 20s and 30s considered a military conflict? Is the Iranian operation of 1941 considered a military conflict? This only proves that this is an idiotic section
Novgorod was not Rus. All russian main historians said that. Novgorod was started at 930, Kiyv at 500+-
@@dmitriystoyanov933 ссылатся на пидивики, себе дороже. Тем более там твои хлопцы каждую неделю меняют, переписывают, дополняю, сочиняют.
@@schlangen7889значит авторитетные российские доктора исторических наук - это мои хлопцы? Ну ок, пусть будет так. Даже Янин, самый авторитетный историк из Новгорода, говорит о том, что Новгород основан в 10м веке. Радиоуглеродный анализ первых мостовых об этом тоже говорит.
@@dmitriystoyanov933 если ты не в курсе, но сам разработчик Википедии говорил, что ей нельзя верить потому что её каждый может редактировать. Если твои знании остаются на уровне вики, мне жаль. Теперь ясно почему твоя страна не вышла с 90х
Ты сейчас реально меришься, чей город старше? Ты что ли комплексуешь? У тебя что ли писка маленькая или как. Населённый пункт может основан в любом века, и только спустя несколько столетий записан как село или город. Возраст не важен, а важно что он из себя представлял. На территории Месопотамия находятся старейшие города в мире, и что. Новгород не уступал Киеву. Термин Киевская Русь появился как термин, чтоб назвать определённый период в истории. И она не было единой. Новгородская Русь это Новгородская земля если не знал
@@dmitriystoyanov933 Новгород стал первым центром государства Русь и тогда появилась Новгородская русь, Рюрики Хююрики и прочая скандинавская хуета.
Год основания Новгорода 850, НО, Киев на тот момент не был ни Славянским, ни Сарматским городом. Киев стал центром лишь благодаря князю Олгу Вещему после захвата Киева в 882 году и переносом туда княжеского престола, так и пошло -
Thanks for this man! This ought to bring me an hour of enterteiment!🎉🎉🎉🎉❤❤❤❤
16:40 I don't see southern Ukraine on the map and don't remember it being mentioned early in the video. The only ones that were mentioned were Rus-tribes annexed by Lithuania and Kievan Khanate.
23:33 Who are those "Ukrainian" nobles who were they representing?
30:00 Who are Belarusians? I don't remember them on the map. I don't see any Ukraine participating in the revolt on the map
39:50 Wow, such a big Ukraine came out of nowhere
44:13 What an irony, Stalin was actually Georgian, his real surname is Dzhugashvili
😂 I can't watch this 🐂💩 as a comedy as you do
an actual constructive comment, with its only reply looking like a feckin’ troll (seriously, the punk above seriously didn’t need all those emojis to make the point, just look at their recent comment history for proof)
cool
This whole wars thing is strangely relaxing
"Go the sleep my little muscovite, i'll protect you from the dangers outside."
- Mother Russia (probably)
Stuff like this is always going to be interesting IMO
Fun Fact: At the past, Turkic peoples like Bulgars, Khazars, Pechenegs, Avars, Huns, Onogurs, Utigurs, Sabirs, Saragurs, Kutrigurs, Kipchaks, Cumans, Tatars, Ottomans etc. were fighting with each other for Ukraine. But now, Slavic peoples are fighting for it
@@Alexandre-sz2jbTell ‘em to bring out the whole ocean
Indo-European people were always present in modern day Ukraine. Some people even credit Ukraine for possibly being slavic people's homeland. Turkic people, Huns and later Mongols were invaders.
So what? For example, Prussia and Austria were bitter enemies.
@@Unknown_Planet That really depends on what time
in Austro-Germanic history we're talking about.
"Frienemies" probably describes it best.
Кто тебе сказал что авары или гуны тем более были тюрками?) нет нет нельзя так делать всех тюрки записывать и удревнять себе историю
Your videos are really good, I've been learning a lot, but I think 2 things would improve them even more:
Could you put the event name and date, (or starting and ending date) of such event you're speaking, on the top-right corner of the screen?
And also the name of the nation you're talking about on the center-bottom of the screen?
This would give us a better feeling for how long things are taking and a certainty for the names to search.
This is a Oversimplified level video. Its super understandable and funny
Japan's secret service was instrumental in defeating the Russian in the Russo-Japanese War. The intel they had on the bulk of the Russian Baltic fleet being deployed to the conflict gave the Japanese what they needed to devise a strategy which would humiliate the Russians.
Inaction of Russian generals was insturmental in the defeat, Japan had no chance in land battles if not for cowards in high Russian command.
@@dimas3829120 тыс. Японцев и 15 тыс. Русских.
Русско-Японская война была проиграна из-за тупого, продажного и трусливого начальства. +Логистика и география сделало своё дело.
Япония воевало рядом с домом, а Русским приходилось с Европы чёрт знает сколько добираться через Сибирь и тонны снега к порту Артуру.
Не забываем, что у Русских было старое говно на кораблях, а у японцев новенькие европейские крейсера и т.д.
И даже так, в сухопутной схватке японцы теряли в разы больше людей.
А командование Русских даже после отбития атак, приказывало отступать.
Уход из порта Артура и вовсе бредятина. Отдать то, что не могут взять.
Поэтому о каких-то сверх секретных службах - это говно.
Япония тогда напоминала богатого ребёнка, у которого есть дорогие игрушки и бабахалки.
СССР в 39 году показал как должна была закончиться Русско-Японская, если бы руководство не давало дёру.
1945 год тута же. Квантунская армия, привет)
Japan had horrendous losses on land. Japan's main advantage is the support of the main maritime powers: Great Britain and the USA, both wanted to reduce Russia's influence in the Pacific Ocean.
Angry Turkic noises😢
Love this.
the author, for some reason, forgot to tell you that the only direct clash between Russians and Americans took place in 1919 near Arkhangelsk. The American expeditionary brigade was defeated by Red Army units and evacuated in a panic. Russian Russians are 1-0 in favor, and if we also take into account how many American planes were shot down in Korea by Russian pilots and how many planes the Americans lost from Russian air defense calculations, then Russia has always beaten the Americans!
Qing in the 17th century: easily defeats Russia and acquires land
Qing in the late 18th century: fails to even defend inner Manchuria and is practically being colonized by Japan
Qing in the 20th century: *dies*
Кстати это не совсем война русские проиграли при этом потеряв 650 а китайцы 2500
Found something to compare in the 17th century it was clear fields without good supply bases from the western part of the country, Russia simply could not afford to move a normal army to the east, over the years this problem was solved
They simply fought off a gang of Russian conquistadors)
great videos
@@Alexandre-sz2jb im Christian
Can you do "What if everything went perfect for Soviet Union?"
Like:
- Lenin not dying too early;
- fascism never truly arising in Europe but remaining as possibility in the rest of the world;
- revolutions in Germany, France and probably Spain;
- Germany and Soviet Union sharing leadership in Comintern;
- mutual sharing of technologies and resources in Comintern;
- absence of 'cold war' as it is already hot with sporadic military clashes between Comintern with USA and British Commonwealth;
- Comintern helping chinese communists against Japan and chinese nationalists;
- revolutionary 'crusades' against non-communist countries in Europe, Middle East and Asia;
- both sides starting to develop nuclear weapons on the same pace.
He already has a scenario made by a viewer about soviets winning the Cold War
Idk why but this reminds me of disco elysium
@@Alexandre-sz2jb
There are no gods.
We broke them to pieces after our temporary alliance against Old Ones.
U defo deserve far more subs and views than u get bro very good quality and detail
Well, what can I say - the events from Russian history are transmitted relatively correctly, but... In some places there is a huge omission of details and an attempt to add up the points and derive an arithmetic average, which overall looks rather pathetic, since a general, average analysis misses entire historical and political layers... The story doesn't work on the principle of simplification, guys.
P.S. And I have another question about the correctness of the comparison with the United States. As far as I know, the history of the United States begins at the beginning of the 17th century (and then very conditionally). And the question is, by what criterion do you compare the 14th century (the period when the Moscow principality began to gain strength) and the 17th? Then make comparisons with the states that existed in the historical period under consideration, otherwise it can be called a "pulling an owl onto a globe".
Apparently, the American-centric view of world history is very difficult to overcome (if not impossible).
here is a fun game for y'all: take a shot every time there is a Kazak rebellion.
@Alexandre-sz2jb ok
I still want to see possible history take a few crazy pills and rationalize Avant-garde France’s accelerationism
I'd love to see a Polish version of this
"russia breathed agressively and had severe internal crysis so we decided took some of its territories that righfully belong to us. Then time passed and these bastards come back and splitted us." (repeat this text in loop every ~100years)
Could be neat, cause there's this nationalist myth (which in some contexts veers into Polish Neo-nazism...) that Poland was never an empire that never invaded anybody & never annexed anything or colonized anybody - though they did all of it.
@@ImPedofinderGeneral
Since when did those territories rightfully belong to them?
@@justauser6078 thats a meme. Take the thing and declare "its rightfully belong to us". Voila, you are pole/russian/name it nationalist
@@ImPedofinderGeneral Alright.
Why wasn't ancient Rus added here? Russia is a rightful heir of it
Yes, it is its heir, but so are Ukraine and Belarus, so he surely wanted to make it distinctly Russian
@@bfdiepictennisballbfdi2359 yea, good logic
Because russia =/= rus, russia = moscovia
@@ukrainskiszpieg9612 Russia was formed by Ruric descendant that ruled Rus while Ukraine formed as a Polish colony on a territory of former Rus (aka Borderland) so, what is your point?
@@harrybalanovsky2169 Rurik is a mythical character whose existence is not confirmed, since according to archaeological excavations, Novgorod, appear only in the 930.
Rus is not Russia, at the time when from 1199 to 1349 there was a kingdom of Rus on the territory of western Ukraine, Muscovy was on the territory of russia. And you can not tell me your fantasies.
About winter war in Finland. That was not flexing. Finland border is just too close to S. Petersburg.
USSR asked Finland(Nazi ally btw) for some territory but got rejected. That's why USSR started a war: For S. Petersburg safety.
Bro ur information is so inaccurate. Now i see propaganda.
Ваша информация верная. СССР предлагал Финляндии территории в пять раз больше занимаемых, в Карелии. Если бы границы не отодвинули то Ленинград бы не выстоял в Блокаду. Так, что все верно .
Finland became an ally of Germany after the winter war*
PH, you should do another viewers voting on carving up a map video, maybe WW1 or WW2 or even earlier? It could be a cool series!!
There is one ongoing right this moment! You can vote here: forms.gle/G4JfoWUHVXW7ed6Y8
God bless you man! Good man yourself!!!@@possiblehistory
Ваше бомба, но жаль что не было упомянуто время до монгольского нашествия.
Потому что там уж совсем домыслы и крайне мало источников.
@@_b_x_b_1063ну, о большинстве событий не так уж и мало. Те же походы Святослава и в русских и в византийских источниках описаны
@@_b_x_b_1063 как мало, византийские писания, Византия вообще описала огромный пласт времени, и является настоящим кладом, вы чего
@@_b_x_b_1063 Источников полно - византийских, арабских путешественников, и самих русских летописей.
бомба 💩
love it
The supercut was meant to be released on August 29th😭😭
Can you make a alternate treaty of Versailles for us to vote on pls
great video! just next time maybe put dates so it is a bit better to follow!
Why Muscovy instead of Kievan Rus? The continuity was never broken. Yes, Moscow is the capital of Russia. However, there was also the Vladimir-Suzdal Duchy which was also the predecessor of Russia. Why not include it? Any other duchies that were before it? Not fair.
Bro also forgot the novgorod time and when Oleg rurik conquered kiev and founded kievan rus aka great russia
Kievan rus was not a country. It was a period if time- pre-mongolian invasion.
@@McHallel LOL no, its like you are saying "Austria unified Greater Germany when they were emperor of the HRE" its dumb and false, Oleg never proclamed Russia and never annexed the regions to make Russia, so he didn't founded Russia.
@@sprintfoxy1240 Rhenish Franconia didn't called Germany yet it was german. The name doesn't matter its a weird logic you have so nobody has ever had history. So the tang dynasty isnt chinese because they didnt called themselfs CCP? so nazi Germany wasnt germany because Hitler called it 3. Reich? The ottomans are not türkiye because it didn't called türkiye? And the list goes on
@@McHallel "its a weird logic you have" this says it all, and the stuff you are on about is just out of line here
2:14 "Russian forces in true Russian fashion got drunk and were crushed this"
wtf, the source of this bullshit?
The battle on Pyana river (year 1377). That's actually a historical fact. What is even more hilarious is that Pyana in Russian basically means "drunk". Surprisingly it is not some kind of antirussian bias or something, there were many cases of such scenarios all across medieval Europe :)
@@user-lv4ub7mx8x So, now you want to say that the toponym (the name of the river) has something to do with the sobriety of the participants in the battle? Let us assume (although this is unlikely to be true) that this is so, but “real Russian fashion” is already a bias. One thing that is not clear is how the supposedly usually "drunk" Russians of whom 1.8% of the world control the territory of the largest country in the world
@@msergey Bro, I'm Russian myself and it is a historical fact described in medieval Russian history books (letopis'), I even gave you the exact date, so you can google it. This story is eve taught at schools.
The name of the river has nothing to do with the battle itself it is simply a funny coincidence.
However, I agree that the phrase about "Russian fashion" is quite insulting but I'm already used to hearing such nonsense.
24:59 took me a while to realise he said Tadeucz Kosciusko
Can you do "What if Mexico won the mexican-american war"
Can you make this with prussia, spain, austria, france and britain
Put the year on the map please bro
would you like it if the history of your country was distorted?
What's the total russian score if you counting Russia in all of its incarnations?
Bro please put some dates or years on the screen
man, i'm loving this series, i'd love to see episodes on: France, Austria, and Germany (brandenburg>prussia>germany).
Do this with France please!
1:17 another result: that ocean in Siberia became land
Ivan the toddler 😂😂😂
Please make more video's like this but with other countries, I would like to see United Kingdom, Poland, Germany, Austria, Hungary, Turkey, France
(Video-Video's from the begining, example → [from Wessex to United Kingdom]
I came for the stats...
I watched for the maps
I like the part when Soviet playing whack-a-mole lol
Do this with Sweden pls!
It would be more interesting with an addition of Novgorod republic - Sweden wars. Moscovites literally inherited all the Novgorod - Sweden wars.
Can you do a version with Japan?
58:15 Keep dreaming
Thus is long... I like it
18:24 why did you not include Denmark and Saxony? The also were a part of the war
I just became the 99,000th subscriber 😮
Nice
What if Operation Barbarossa started one month earlier? (With Italy conquering the Balkans without German help)
Starting Barbarossa a month early could be interesting, though only so far as knowing that the Germans would still lose but would probably gain a little more ground before the winter came.
Italy conquering the Balkans without German help is an entirely different matter lol.
@@CMitchell808, I have doubts about your first claim, that's why I really want to see a meticulous analysis.
This channel has voiced the opinion that Germany could only realistically defeat the Soviet Union if the initial blitzkrieg attempt was more successful than it ended up being. Since the majority of the Soviet population lived close to the areas that were being fought over, if the Germans had conquered more land it would have significantly reduced the Soviet capacity to wage war. Their potential manpower would quickly plummet the more Germany advanced.
I wonder how decisive this would have proved, if Germany had pushed past Moscow.
It's started in June 22
0:14: 📚 The video discusses the wars waged by Russia and their predecessors, starting from the Grand Duchy of Muscovy to the modern day.
5:56: 📚 The video discusses the first Muscovite-Lithuanian war and Ivan III's rise to power.
11:09: 🌊 The video discusses various conflicts in Russian history, including the Ottoman invasion, Russian colonization of Siberia, and the Boris Gudunov Swedish War.
16:49: 🌍 Russia's territorial expansion and conflicts in the 17th century.
22:42: 🌍 Europe is embroiled in a series of wars and conflicts involving France, Prussia, Austria, Britain, and Russia.
27:57: 🌍 The video discusses the events of the War of the Fifth Coalition, including the French invasion of Russia and its consequences.
33:13: 🌍 The video discusses various historical events and their impact on different regions.
38:39: 🔴 Russia signs a treaty with Germany to end World War One, leading to the Russian Civil War between the Red Army and the White Army.
44:14: 🌍 The Soviet Union faced conflicts and diplomatic challenges in Georgia, Afghanistan, and China.
49:16: 🌍 The video discusses the split of Korea and the wars that ensued in the region, including the Korean War and the Vietnam War.
54:50: ! Russia's involvement in various conflicts and attempts to break away from other nations in the post-Soviet era.
Recap by Tammy AI
That propaganda on the Russo-Ukrainian war kills me everytime. I though history was unbiased and needed to be looked at a neutral stance. Armchairhistory did that, even if some bias he kept it more neutral aligned.
It’s super cut and vague, but not neutral in the sense that you imagine.
@@unbridled_rage What do you mean exactly by "not neutral in the sense that you imagine" ?
@@sprintfoxy1240bro started from the moscow era a popular anti russian Propaganda. Russia started from the novgorod rus founded by king rurik.
@@McHallel God damnit asylum need to tighten their security to not let people like you on the internet
Novogorod founded RUS but not RUSSIA
Russia comes from Rus
@@McHallelI consider Novogorod and the Kievan Rus' predecessor states and not Russia itself. So does most of the world. Russia itself for the longest time accepted that too.
The only people who say Novogorod and the Rus' are Russia are the people who buy fully into Russian propaganda.
If it progressed from Novogorod>Kievan Rus'>Muscovy/Russia, then you could probably say they're all the same, but that's not correct. The Rus' vanished from the map in the early 1200s following the Mongol invasion and their successors only gained independence in the mid 1300s when the Golden Horde allowed them to.
It's fucking amazing how Russia has managed to rewrite their own history.
Более 300 лет истории пропустили. Надо было начать с Советского союза. Чего мелочиться
this is going to be calm video
Ok but next time do France! Theyve fought over 1000 battles alone
5:29 not Tatar, but Mongol rule
16:00 I did not expect that
Can you do the same thing but with Turkey / the Ottomans?
Sir please make a video on like how germany could have won ww2 i mean complete scenario.
Почему нельзя сказать просто Москва? Зачем коверкать слово и изобретать "московитов"? И не было никакой Московии, а если и есть, то почему другие страны так не коверкаете?
Ну московией и московитами на сколько я знаю нас называли поляки, а сейчас просто это украина перенела и стало трендом
@@user-tz6vf8to5fТем временем у вас на монетах для иностранцев писали московия, а сами себя називали московским государством.
Moscovia was the political and geographical name Russian state and the Tsardom of Russia in Western sources, used with varying degrees of priority in parallel with the ethnographic name Russia (Russian: Руссия, tr. Russiya) from the 15th to the beginning of the 18th century.[2][3] Initially, it was the Latin name of Moscow (for comparison: Latin: Varsovia, Kiovia) and the Grand Duchy of Moscow.[4][5] Later in Western and Central Europe it was transferred to the Tsardom of Russia, formed around Moscow under Ivan III. Various researchers believe that its use was facilitated by Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth propaganda, which explicitly retained the terminology of feudal fragmentation, denying the legitimacy of the struggle of Ivan III and his successors for the reunification Rus' lands.[6] The Latinate Moscovia was not used,[7] entering the Russian language no earlier than the 18th century as an incompletely mastered borrowing.
Московия - политическое и географическое название Российского государства и Царства Российского в западных источниках, использовавшееся с разной степенью приоритетности параллельно с этнографическим названием Россия (рус. Руссия, тр. Russiya) с 15 до начала 18 века.[2][3] Первоначально это было латинское название Москвы (для сравнения: латинское: Варсовия, Киовия ) и Великое княжество Московское.[5] Позже в Западной и Центральной Европе она была передана в состав Российского царства, образовавшегося вокруг Москвы при Иване III. Различные исследователи полагают, что его использованию способствовала пропаганда Речи Посполитой, которая явно сохраняла терминологию феодальной раздробленности, отрицая законность борьбы Ивана III и его преемников за воссоединение русских земель.[6] Латинское Moscovia не использовалось,[7] вошло в русский язык не ранее XVIII века как не полностью освоенное заимствование.
Вроде статья не русскоязычная, а про монету я ничего не знаю, вы бы поинтересовались когда, кому были адресованы и где были эти монеты, а то вдруг польскими окажутся
@@ukrainskiszpieg9612
@@user-tz6vf8to5f они чеканились как раз в москве, никакого руского царства не било, било Московское государство пока его не переименовали в российскую имерию.
@@ukrainskiszpieg9612 Московия это иностранное название, монеты с надписями латиницей Московия чеканились при Петре I в небольшом количестве для внешних расчётов, потому что потому что Россию знали на Западе под таким названием. Гугли что такое "экзоэтноним", Московия это не самоназвание
Please make Poland next. We, poles, guarante that -we wont get into your house at 3 am and we wont watch Polish Films- we will be happy
Lore of EVERY WAR In Russian History || Supercut momentum 100
the way he described peter III 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
This is more relevant now, after Tucker Carlson's interview with Putin.
You could do Rome as the next nation you cover. I think that would be interesting (and possibly pretty long), especially if you include the East Roman ("Byzantine") Empire to the list.
What if the Ottoman Empire stayed neutral in the First World War?
You missed Alaska
Correction, in a sochi conflict russian white army invaded Georgia and ended up losing badly around 1917-8, also kievs-rus invaded Georgia in 13th century and lost badly
Kieven rus didnt exist in 13th century
@@slopeisdope2293 it did lol (at least this is what we call Russian states)
@@Darkseidsolosfiction no kiev rus didn't exist in the 13th century. U have a bunch of principalities and yea moscovy was one of them that later formed russia. BOT
@@slopeisdope2293 I know but we call them that in my country, I already explained it
What if the Russians never helped the austrians with the Hungarian Rebellion and what if the Egyptians won their war against the Ottoman Empire which would cause its collapse
As a swed, watching the third northern war in the 19th minuter hurts me
All: YOU MAY NOT FIGHT WITH (Sweden and the Ottoman Empire) FOR AT LEAST FIVE MINUTES
Can you do a version for germany pls ?
@@Alexandre-sz2jb im muslim bro
@@algerieball.4156 it’s a bot
Muscovy didnt exist. Its Moscow.
What made US the leader of that score? 1 victory against small part of British colonists? Or participation in WW2 against weaken Germany or bombardments of Yugoslavia?
In fact US nearly never fought a strong opponent
Italy, england and france would probably the most interesting ones
France being the country that has won the most wars
England being the country that had the biggest empire
Italy dating back to rome had a lot of war
My guy really called England a country 💀
or how about persia/iran or maybe even egypt for oldness
@@that1countrieschannelAnd England was a country at one point. Your point being?
@@The_Otto_Von_Bismarck England isn't a country anymore and hasn't for the past ~300 years. He used the modern names for all of the others
@@that1countrieschannelannoying
perché il regno russo con la bandiera dell'Impero russo?
This makes me wonder. Why didn't Lithuania help Muscovy against Horde instead of invading them
why would they? they benefited from Moscow being weak.
@@valthok And it was a bad idea in the long run
Because Lithuania is a terrible place
@@akdele5 Nah they are more of hypocrates. Also what oblast are you from
@@quakeknight9680 not an Oblast
18:19 Danmark, Russia and Poland-Lithuania and Saxony declared war on Sweden after the swedish king Karl XI died and his son Karl XII became the new king. Sweden at first fought the Danes and after defeating the Danes, sent troops to fight the Russian army in Narva(which was besieged by russia) which would be destroyed. After the battle of Narva, Sweden would focus on defeating Poland-Lithuania and Saxony. After defeating them, Sweden would try march to Moscow but then forced to go to Ukraine. By that time, the swedish army lacked ammunition (and the ones left in bad quality) and food, leaving the army no choice but to attack a fortified Russian army, leading to the swedish army getting destroyed in the battle of Poltava and most of the remaining soldiers surrendering and the swedish king fleeing to Türkiye. The battle of Poltava 1709 was the turning point for Sweden in the lead to other countries such as Danmark (redeclare) declare war on sweden.
43:03
Arial Sea:
Do a version with Germany
Itd also have to include prussia since if they only involve the ones between 1871-1945 it would be very little
interesting
this is a very minor mistake in the map of the Israeli Egypt war on the Sinai.
at the time Palestine was not an independent nation at all (in fact Palestine never even try to declare declared independence until 1988 claiming basically everywhere that Israel is in), with the Gaza strip and the west bank being occupied by Israel, and before the 6 day war the Gaza strip and West bank were taken over by Egypt Jorden respectively from the End of Israel's war of independence)
i know not everyone is an Israel fan with many supporting Palestine, but at least let the maps remain correct.
Day 5 of asking for What If History Went Perfect for Mexico
38:56 the finnish borders are wrong. Pechenga was controlled by the allies at the time, and Uhtua (Kalevala) by finns.
You should do the United Kingdom. It would be cool to see and it would be interesting as the UK had the largest empire in history and owned many of the biggest countries around today! Also it may help people learn the difference between England and the UK lol
4:24 на Республику Северного Гаража)))
Was Russia's involvement in the Niger coup after this video was uploaded? It's missing.