The Battle of 73 Easting - The Most Intense Tank Battle In History
Vložit
- čas přidán 22. 05. 2024
- This was one of the and most likely last epic tank battle in the history of mankind. In this educational history video, we will take a look at what happened in the gulf war at the Battle of 73 Easting.
The end of America's war in Vietnam saw a US military in crisis- its morale all but depleted and its combat expertise watered down by massive conscription. In the years that followed the Pentagon focused on restoring America's military by returning to an all-volunteer force and addressing the problems of systemic drug abuse and a weak officer and non-commissioned officer corp. But just how well would America's military fare in a new conflict after years of neglect and waste? Twenty years after Vietnam, the world would get to find out as America's forces were immediately thrown into the last of the greatest tank battles of the 20th century. Hello and welcome to another episode of The Infographics Show- today we're taking a look at the Battle of 73 Easting, and how America proved once more it was a force to be reckoned with.
SUBSCRIBE TO US -► bit.ly/TheInfographicsShow
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
WEBSITE (SUGGEST A TOPIC):
theinfographicsshow.com
SOCIAL:
Twitter........► / theinfoshow
Subreddit...► / theinfographicsshow
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sources for this episode:
pastebin.com/qpchPQnv
Which piece of technology or equipment would in your opinion mean a great advantage in a battle nowadays - similar to GPS navigation in the mentioned battle?
Optical Camo!!!! ALSO PLEASE MAKE AN EARTH IN STAR WARS WHAT IF VIDEO?! PLUS MERRY XMAS!
You should do a video on some of the best Dogfighting battles since the airplane has become a huge part of war.
What animation programme do you use?
Extreme range sensors and targeting. I would love to see the F-35 equivalent of ground combat.
@@TheCrypto laser guided bombs, anti radiation missiles and cruise missiles. These are specific technologies, otherwise more general weapon systems would be multi role jets, areal superiority jets, AWACs, self propelled SAMs and self propelled artillery.
Ok... so there are some glaring inaccuracies here.
I’m going to begin by saying that I am a career soldier and a 19k (Abrams Crewman). I joined the army back in 1998 and other than a 4 year break in service, I have served ever since. Additionally, I am what you would call an Armored History “nerd”. I have been on every version of the Abrams since the M1A1 “Heavy Common” and I have served under and spoken directly with HR McMaster about the battle of 73 Easting.
First off, the latest version of the Abrams that was fielded in the gulf was the M1A1, not the A2. This might sound like a nitpicking thing to say, but the difference in capabilities of the two platforms are vast. Many units were still equipped with later versions of the M1IP which had the smaller 105mm main gun and the Marines and some National Guard units had the M60A3 with the same 105mm gun and none of the advanced armor that the M1 boasted. These tanks were still highly effective against Iraqi Armor.
Next, while the T72 is an effective platform for what it is, the Iraqi “Lion of Babylon” version was a stripped down export version. With its rudimentary fire control system, its maximum effective range with its 125mm is at around 2000 meters. 2000 meters for an Abrams isn’t even considered long range. Statements from captured Iraqi soldiers state that when Eagle troop first opened fire the Iraqis thought they were under attack from artillery. The Abrams with its superior thermal sights and fire control systems was able to engage and destroy those elements before they were even detected. Granted, Eagle Troop was completely outnumbered, but the Republican Guard was completely out maneuvered and out classed. The battle of 73 Easting, while an excellent example of American tactical and technological superiority, was a one sided “Turkey Shoot.”
Thank you for the reading 📖 sir, much obliged.
honest question here. Im by no means a tank expert but wasnt chobham armor British designed first appearing on some late cheiftian models?
I was getting ready to ask about the Lion of Babylon
no bravery unlike the brave heroes of the republican guard
@@dragonbank6807 No, chobham armor was first developed for the Challenger MBT. Which, originally, was designed as an export tank primarily to Iran, of all places.
It was only picked to become the replacement for the Chieftain because the Brits never could get the legendarily terrible Leyland L60 multifuel engine to work properly.
At any given time, the Chieftains operational numbers was only around 30% because of that piece of junk.
Never change, UK. Never change. Lol ;)
I was there, but not on the front. A soldier who was in one of the tanks told me it was easy. He said shooting the T 72s was like a video game.
So battlefield has trained me for something after all
@@deathphantomdaredevil Is that what you did?
Kevin Healey When your mate is in a tier 1 tank while you’re in a modern tank in WT
no, I was in the back. I was a mechanic
If BF3 is anything to go by it was laughably easy even on the game's "hardest" difficulty
My dad was in desert storm, he is 59 as of today. He is turning 60 in a few weeks. Words aren’t enough for me to express how happy I am to still have him with me today.
God Bless your Father and his continued longevity. He is surely a treasure to your family as well as for Americans everywhere.
I know I'm supper late but I was there with 2AD Forward attached to 1ID. I was an 18-year old loader on an M-1A1(H) tank. 72 Easting is always discussed but it is honestly just the opening shots to a much larger battle at Norfolk that followed that no one ever talks about. Shortly after this engagement 2ACR did a passage of lines with our brigade that was spearheading 1ID. The weather was horrible. It had been all week. Super cold, wet, and foggy. Felt more like Bar Harbor than the Arabic desert. We lost two M1-A1s to frat that night so I know we lost at least two because I stood in front of them, but I think up to four to frat total. 2ACR created a chaotic mess when they let themselves get overly engaged to be honest but there were a lot of battalion level commanders looking to make a name for themselves that night. Anyway, that's nothing new. A couple comments that stood out in this video. I really wish you guys would consult a SME instead of just the internet sometimes because a lot of people get this stuff wrong. No M-1A2s in ODS. We deployed from Germany and had just received the newest M-1 family of tanks 3-months before ODS. The M-1A1(H) or Heavy. Also. T-72 can't take a hit from an M-1 APFSDS-T round at 2k, 3k, or 4k in the frontal armor. We were popping turrets of T-72s at 3500 to 3800 meters. one last thing, the 1UK deployed with Challenger tanks that also had a form of Chobham armor.
Lots of misinformation here. I deployed as a tanker with the 1st Cavalry Division. We took the old M1 Abrams we were using at Ft Hood with us to Saudi. A couple of months later, in December, we convoyed to the port and swapped out our M1s for brand new M1A1 tanks straight off the assembly line. My new tank had 7 miles on the odometer and the paint in my drivers hatch was still sticky. We then took them to a area near the port where the mechanics welded slabs of DU armor to the front of the turrets. My tank was also outfitted with an Israeli made mine plow. My unit was posted in the Wadi al Batin after the air war began and we made frequent probes across the line into Iraq. A few of our Cav Scouts were killed on one of these probes when their Bradley took a hit from an enemy tank. Our Division used probes and strikes by missiles and artillery to get the Iraqi army focused on our area. When the ground war began we rushed up the Wadi, blasted everything in sight and then withdrew as other Divisions made the famous "left hook" and came up behind and on the flank of the enemy who had been focused on fighting us. We were some of the first conventional forces across enemy lines and broke through the razor wire, anti-tank trenches, mine fields and other barriers the Iraqis had spent months constructing.
damn, that is some overpowering tactics. thank you for you service sir.
I just want to start off and say thank you for your service. I’m also a tanker, stationed in Fort Hood with 2-5 Cav
cellblock776 that’s bs all m1a1 drivers came with the tanks m1 drivers started driving Bradley
@@americansniper1641 sound like a troll, plus the fact he said he was a Cav Scout...... which means they can operate any tracked Vexh damn near
Thank you for your service 👍🇺🇸
Ah they'll never get past our bunker.
*Literally rolls right over it*
😂
“Uh we uh let them do that”
US Tank driver: Anyone else feel that?
reminds me of a story from WW2 where some Soviets planned to hold a defensive line using an abandoned church as a defensive position since it was solid stone with a stone wall around it and could withstand small arms as well as stop most explosives and any tanks the Germans had at the time. The only problem with the Soviets plan was that this group of Germans had just gotten the new Tiger tank, which simply drove through their fire, drove through the stone wall, ran over a tree, and then plowed through the church without stopping.
US vehicle crew: What was that?
Iraqi bunker troops: *CONFUSED SCREAMING*
'The Battle of 73 Easting - The Most One Sided Tank Battle in History' Fixed your title for you.
It was pretty intense for the Iraqis
@@joshuawatts1924 yea because they didn't have thermal or gps advantages plus there army was not tank centered like the us
"most intense tank battle in history"
Kursk: "Am I a joke to you?"
Kursk lasted much longer than 23 minutes, therefore was far less intensive while much larger overall
As someone who actually participated in the Battle of 73 Easting in Eagle Troop 2nd ACR under McMaster I can tell you that the Iraqis actually fought hard This was NOT as big as Kursk, but it wasn't a small battle either. This is the first video that I've seen that mentions McMaster disobeyed orders. Upper leadership was deficient and there is a reason why no book on the subject uses the squadron commanders name. The squadron XO and McMaster basically had to take over.
Russians would destroy you people.
We fought well, even though the fight wasn't rewarded at all
@@nsrbk
You should be proud. Much respect to your unit.
@@davidcraft4636 thank you I do
Thank you many sources make it seem like the Iraqis were just taking the hits but from what I’ve known the T72 models couldn’t do much if anything at all to the Abrams frontal armor
Battle of Kursk was a real tank battle of epic dimensions. This was a turkey shoot
BeyondWrittenWords exactly it was one of the last of the centuries but certainly not the most intense
Battle of Prokhorovka was the tank battle. Kursk was an entire front
It was the biggest most important tank battle in history the epic showdown saw the Red Army square off against the Nazi's a follow up from the Battle Of Stalingrad the battle was intense and although both side's lost many tanks yet tank after tank poured out of the Soviet union to fight the German tanks numbers the German army could not fight against if anyone wants to know why Russia has the most tanks in the world Kursk is a big part of that
Kursk was pretty much a turkey shooting as well honestly.
@@sodaking6858 whatbthe he'll are you on about? Are you saying that the battle of kursk with th3 Soviets having so many tanks is the reason they have so many tanks? Wtf lol, the reason they had so many tanks is because they could.
The Abrams literally had a field day, I remember watching an interview from one of the gunners who fought in the Easting they said it was like playing a video game. Imagine you’re in an all out war and your enemy says fighting you was like playing a video game…. That’s not a war bro… that’s a slaughter.
Love how none of the tanks actually look like their historical selves.
*I bet The losing tanks were not using wix*
Ikr
@@BowmanFox stfu their dead now it doesn't matter
@@BowmanFox calm down i know you dont use wix
Or used skillshare
@@BowmanFox ERA would be useless anyways because the US mainly use APFSDS which is a KE (kinetic Energy) and ERA is mainly used against HEATFS or chemical rounds such as rockets and grenades. The T64BV is a better version than the T72 armour wise because as you said it was am export version it's the same with the Abrams with the 105mm is now a export to Dubai and other countries
Saddam Hussein has left the chat
so has george h.w bush lol
Left the chat to go hang out somewhere.
Football Is Life Nope, say that all you want. You calling me a commie is just like me calling you a Mexican alien because of the stereotype that all Latinos are Mexicans. Complete fake news. Sorry snowflake but I’m a conservative that wants to become a soldier to serve the US Army and serve my President, the glorious Donald Trump. No mind tricks, and I don’t like communism but I LOVE Trump and America. Proud to be an American. God bless America. Where’s your patriotism and American spirit? If you’re American, you should be more welcoming of Hispanic conservatives. Especially since you’re a conservative yourself. Also, did you see my comment down below about the Vietnamese. My other comment calls the Vietnamese “no good rice farming communists” and “better dead than red”. That’s all the proof you need that I’m not a communist
Bet he was shitting his pants when Americans invaded Iraq
I keep seeing you on like every other video on CZcams.
Me: **sees a T-14 instead of T-72**
Also me: this is outrageous
@@REB4444 I mean, the T-14 wouldn't have been there even if you had a time machine. They have maybe 100 prototypes undergoing testing and they are 2 years behind their mass production date with no end to delays in sight.
“Most intense tank battle.” The Soviets and Germans are giggling at you. 🤣🤣🤣
The one thing Weraboos and Commiaboos agree on
True.
Yes The Russia trained the Iraq tankers keep giggling.
He’s talking about the battle of Kursk which is the largest tank battle in history
@@shawnashelton4064 intense in this case is a combination of the time line and number of vehicles destroyed per minute average.
It most definitely wasn't the largest tank battle or the highest number of vehicles destroyed.
Having served in Desert Storm as a Marine I can say that the reason the US won so quick was based on several factors. The primary reason the US won so quick was the superiority of weapons and military training. Sure the Republican Guard fought in Iran but that doesn't really say much because in both Iraq and Iran people were conscripted into the military without proper training. This would be another reason the US won so quickly, Iraq forced people to fight. One guy we captured was about 75 years old and blind, yes numbers mattered more than quality. One of their battalion commanders was forced out of retirement to fight the war, he simply surrendered his entire unit as soon as he could. The food for some was extremely poor and had to be cooked on old oil drum lids once the oil had been burned off (however not entirely). In addition moral was super low by the time of the ground war since the Iraqis had been bombed for an entire month from the air and received new worthless money as pay, Saddam just printed more money thereby devaluing it in the process. Several other factors played into the US and Coalition win but that takes at least a lengthy paper or a short book to explain in detail.
didn't a large group of iraqi conscripts surrender to a pair of apaches during desert storm?
Thank you for your service. And yes, yes, my god yes! Not enough people understand all the smaller factors of battle. I love learning from people who've served because they know what actual war is like.
Lol.. I'm pretty sure any coalition force can win quickly against a singular nation. You guys ganged up on Iraq.. Nothing to be proud of.. Smh.. I'm Very Very Sure that if Russia, China, North Korea and Iran formed a coalition like the US, UK, Canada, Australia coalition in Iraq. They can Invade, neutralize and Install a new government in USA within a month. So yeah....
US won so quick because this was the last war the US was in where politicians stayed out of the planning for it and left it up to the Generals. also....SEMPER FI I served in the reserves from, 2004 to 2009 in unit 2 battalion 23rd marines
Sort answer...35 countries vs 1
Which is the most intense tank battle?
A battle in a world war, fought between 2 giants.
Or
A non-world war battle, fought between 1 giant and a country in debt.
EstGamer they warned them. They got what they deserved
@@calebclark6696
Yes, but I knew that, I just didn't want to make the text overly complicated.
@Jamaican Gamer03
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
You forgot to put that one giants were using the Lend-lease act to stay in the war****
Intensity is determined by time. The ww2 battle was a longer period of combat, while the 76 easting lasted less than half an hour.
I think cutting off the enemies communications early on is the most decisive factor that tips victory in your favor in any war
Seen 4 years later, the "graphics" part have come a long way, but the crisp presentation and thoughtful analysis are already there. Great content as usual! Thank you
The Iraqi T72s only had access to the 3BM9 shell, which could only penetrate 300mm of armour at 500m, which is less armour than the turret cheeks of the abrams, which were around 400mm on even the first model. By desert storm, they were using upgraded variants but even so, the T72s could do very little to the abrams. The shells used in desert storm by the Abrams used DU (depleted uranium) penetrators. There were 2 main types of Abrams used, ones with 105mm guns and ones with 120mm guns. The smallest one with the 105, using the M833 DU round could penetrate the T72 beyond 2,000 meters, and that was the first DU round used the for 105mm gun used on early abrams (pre M1A1.) The 120mm armed abrams would easily be able to penetrate the T72 beyond 2,000 meters. The T72s were nothing compared to the abrams
Chill Destroyer The targeting systems were more important then the guns, lots of T-72 waited around with engines off but the Abram was very fast with stabilizers, allowing them to take out most T-72 before their turrets could turn. Also the Iraq military wasn’t trained to the extent the US were.
@@pokemongo-py6yq it doesnt matter how good your targeting system is if you cant penetrate what you're shooting
@Big Fish absolutely true. They absolutely messed up hard with this episode on the facts. I cringed the whole time and felt like going through the screen and rewriting the script in front of the guy talking
@Big Fish the M1A2 didn't even enter service until 1992, a year after the gulf war ended.
Chill Destroyer No tanks is invincible, it’s likely classified but the I’m certain the M1A1 had weakspots. Lower plate, turret ring, somewhere. There were plenty of scenarios that the Americans actually maneuvered around exposing sides and rear. Even if the T-72s were firing high explosive it would still be very dangerous, but the abrams would rarely allow the T-72 to test its armor. There were plenty of Bradley fighting vehicles around too and surely you don’t think they could stop a 125mm gun, yet almost all survived.
The tank drawings are a bit off, especially when explaining about the t-72 and showing a T-14 armata lol
u sound like u play world of tanks
@@salvatorevulcano3655 war thunder >>
Even the BMP 1 looking like a BMP 2 with the autocannon
@@PedroAugusto-zw9ob warthunder isn't accurate
@@Certified_door_kicker I would say it is more accurate than World of Tanks
"Most intense tank battle in history." Really? Do the names, "Kursk," "Golan Heights," "Arracourt" and "Prokhorovka" ring any bells?
Yknow that Prokhorovkha and Kursk are Literally the same thing? Kursk was the Front. prokohovka the Battle
Dominic Schellenberg No, they are not “literally the same thing.” The Battle of Prokhorovka was an armored clash that occurred DURING the Battle of Kursk. The Battle of Kursk lasted from the beginning of Citadel in early July to late August and was the name of the entire confrontation around the Kursk salient. Prokhorovka only lasted a day (July 12).
Thank you
The most intense for the Iraqis
Look up the battle of brody, largest tank battle in history, had more tanks than kursk
I love waymtchibg these history videos of both TIS, and The Armchair historian 👌
Beautiful 😌
The most intense tank battle in American history*
History started in the year 1776. Everything before then was a mistake
Please let me know how many tank battles occurred before 1776 and we'll talk.
Arguably the most intense armored conflict in US history was the Battle of Arracourt...
I'm pretty sure there were more intense US tank battles in WWII France too. Looking back, the battle of 73 Easting was not that intense on the scale of intense tank battles in world history. It may have been the biggest blow out though...
@@EngineeringWizard11 DUDE THAT YEAR IS TOO FAR IN 1776 TANKS WERE NOT CREATED YET CHECK THE HISTORY
This title is false, the battle of Kursk was the biggest and most intense tank battle in history. You can’t just ignore history to make a more clickable title, we aren’t fools.
1973 battle on suez canal in 1973 Yom Kippur war actually exceeded kursk in number of tanks involved but not in number of troops
All of his videos are bullshit. I don't understand why they have more likes than dislikes. Probably cos it's biased towards America and everyones seems so love that.
yet we all clicked so we kinda are fools
bill mcfadden I believe that’s patently false...could you send me a link where I could read about it? Wikipedia doesn’t have the tank numbers for that battle
@@billmcfadden4791 .....battle of Kursk 6000 tanks, up to 1200 destroyed, yom kippur 3430-3600 tanks and apc's. Israel had 293 Centurion tanks combat ready out of 385 total.
My dad was in desert shield/storm and after spent 8 months in Somalia, he told me that the republican guard was like it got stuck in the Cold War and they mowed over them every time they fought.
Iraq: sir we are taking heavy losses
america: dame it you broke my instant coffee Machine
Battle of KURSK was the most intense tank battle
biggest^
@@d1ff76 read the title of the video again ) it says "in history"
@@ratikupatadze7472 last greatest tank battle of the 20th century
rati kupatadze
True
@@d1ff76 Doesn't matter. He didn't state it in the title which is what get their information about the video from.
Drinking game: take a shot every time the narrator says decisive or indecisive.
I am near halfway through the video and im pretty sure i have alcohol poisoning
GTA text: "Wasted"
*dies Of alcohol poisoning*
Shot of Bourbon for every instance of "decisive", hit on a joint after every instance of "indecisive".
4 times in 4 minutes lol once back to back
14:00 bro. wrong sides 🤦♂️
Lol
The content from this channel is so entertaining. I love it! Keep up the good work✅
Why show a t 14 armata when youre talking about a t 72
Cuz Propaganda
Because of Exported Stalinium
Because putin
always keep in mind theese are cvillans
Because it’s just to simplify things, your average joe would probably not know the difference between a Challenger 2 and a Leopard 2A6 or M1A2 Abrams
You forgot to mention our turrets were automatically controlled with a joystick while the Iraqi tanks still had to hand crank their turrets. Imagine you're an Iraqi tank crew member and you find yourself encountering an Abrams to your right and as your frantically cranking your turret by hand to face the enemy the u.s. tanks turret literally just swivels and fires at you.
T-72s had turret motors in them. The problem was they weren't maintained very well and even on the non-export Soviet T-72s they had problems with high failure rates. There's no even kind of modern MBT that requires you to crank the turret around - that kind of thing is used as a backup only.
also, our tanks have IR as well
@@nexpro6118and had night and heat vision
Wrecked them boys💀
Love these videos! about the battles and tactics!!
I noticed they've used this orchestral theme several times. Especially when discussing world/war history. I really like it. It creates suspense.
I honestly thought it said the tank battle of Hastings. I was like bruh what kinda tanks were there in 1066
NuclearKnife It makes no sense how you could’ve thought that.
Hmm i thought it was the tank that ended napoleons reign but that tank battle was intense at hastings
Even Da Vinci's design was designed in the 1500's.
NuclearKnife lol
Bruh obviously the IM-P1...are you stupid?
Holy shit, why are the tank illustrations so bad?
Delta 03 yes it’s quite bad, the entirety of the animation is pretty poor, but hey it works, if you want a good visual explanation don’t watch Infographics
Delta 03 this whole channel has absolutely horrendous animations
That was the Iraq war and next Nickelodeon Sponge Bob Square Pants :)
Do better
Yea, and they use Monument Valley as a backdrop.
Wow! it's been 30 years! Back then I was 1LT Michael Quirion, XO, A Co, 3-15 Infantry. Here's to the crew: Alex Dennis, Bill Moore, Johnny Jones. What a wild ride it was.....
Fun fact: this video is only about five minutes shorter then the actual battle (I think).
Roblox tank battles are obviously the most intense.
I think it's called "best" ;)
Phantom Forces is the new CoD
(Irony Alarm!!!!!)
I KNOW RIGHT!! ESPECIALLY the Red vs Blue ones! 😂😂😂👌❤️
NEVER Roblox
Trainer_Mika TM Always roblox
Good
Wasn’t the battle of Kursk the biggest and most intense tank battle in history?
The ODST nah battle of Dubno was the biggest tank battle
I guess we will never know for sure what is the greatest.
Jack Thorton kursk was the biggest
Callum Stone slimme jongen
The battle of Kursk lasted about a month and was over a very large area. So the battle of 73 Easting could be considered more intense as it only lasted minutes.
My uncle was in this war. I feel bad for him cause he suffers with PTSD.
I love these battle videos. Makes me feel like I’m a part of it somehow
This video is extremely inaccurate. First it tries to paint Desert Storm as a challenge for the UN Coalition. Iraq got absolutely slammed by American forces. Not only that but you keep using inaccurate tank model visuals, for instance when you referred to the T-72 you put on screen several different vehicles including a T-14 Armata. American tanks used in Desert Storm were the M1A1, not M1A2, as the M1A2 was developed during Iraqi Freedom in the early 2000’s. And it’s funny how you say the US’s conscripted military in the Vietnam war ruined the military’s face and they had to fix their reputation and show they were competent again. While you are correct in some respects, you seem to dramatize it, showing Desert Storm as a test of the American military in “The last major war of the 20th century”. So in conclusion this video has so many things wrong with it it’s hard to ignore. Please focus on quality and stop pushing out these low quality videos so often.
Yeah it should be M1A1HA
Tbh, the Iraqi equipment was indeed older, but it was battle proven and still very useful if used correctly. That being said, Iraq had one of the top 5 largest armies in the world at that point. Yes they were facing off against a coalition that included America, but the majority of American equipment wasn't battle tested and was a gamble. I feel like if the Iraqi command structure was more flexible, the Iraqis could've forced a peace deal or at least prolonged the coalition advance
Preach
Came for this comment. For an infographics show, they sure get alot of the graphics completely incorrect.
Just before showing the "T72/Armata," they show Iraqi tanks as Leopard 2A5s, and previously to that, when showing Iraq invading Kuwait, they used Abrams graphics to show the Iraqi armor. What a joke. Pathetic.
C Lillie you pretty much described why the infographic show is trash
I was the driver of the lead Bradley (3rd Platoon) in Eagle Troop that day. Not a perfect video but thanks for calling attention to our actions that day. Toujours Pret!
Thank you for your service. The History channel video is way better. IMO.
Always cool to meet people on CZcams who the video is about
Joseph DAgostino the History channel? The one that always talks about aliens?
hello I was in E24 that day
i think you made this video to just proove us in great
“Most intense”
Battle of Kursk: am I a joke to you?
Braeden Meador lol
150 tanks in few hours vs 2000 tanks in over a month, Kursk was larger not more intensive
Tom Clancy, "Armored Cav." Interviews with people who fought at 73 Easting and detailed maps. Three advantages; equipment, personnel training and communications.
Forth advantage; enemy tanks made of paper mache.
@@dragonheart967 this. Asad Babils just looked like a T-72 but were squishy like civilian vehicles.
Armour is just Base Humvee armor welded onto it...🤣
Nice title you’ve got there
Would be a shame if it was false
Intense tank battle in usa history.
(litteraly suffered almost 0 tank cassulties and only suffered 6KIA)
Meanwhile on the generals of usa mind:this is horrible what a tragic loss.
@@maryjoygelizon4268
6 people dying isn't tragic? Are you out of your mind?
@@Amir4christ ikr
then 13 million russian soldiers dead is the end of a galaxy
SOVIT ANTHEM PLAYES IN BACKGROUND (referring to Stalingrad lol where thousands of tanks fought)
Nicely informative video
Great video
I thought this was simple history
The disappointment is real
There sure are a lot of folks who have never been in a tank battle running their mouths.
Simple history is much better than this
Reality is often disappointing...
u get send to gulag now
red alert 2
The US didn't have M1A2's at this point in time. The tanks that the US deployed into this war and battle were M1IP's and M1A1's. The first deployment of M1A2's to war was The Iraq war in 2003 if i remember correctly.
ethan burrell even if it was in development at this time they didn't see combat until the Iraq war
I agree
Correct but it was still a turkey shoot
Congrats on 10 million subs
I love your channel
Tank battle is an overstatement, it was Barrett M82A1's Vs Muskets. It's sad this war even happened.
The only major tech advantage was the night vision inside the tank. Better armor too I guess
Watch simple history and take notes from them, I don’t care if your graphics are clean I just want them to be accurate
Watch extra credits they do history sc fi and myths
Great idea dude
Pigfarm1403
Extra history,oversimplified,armchair historian, potential history too
then why are you watching simple history....
Respect for the 6 soldiers killed in action 😔
The fact that this video was almost as long as the actual battle…
The US enjoyed air supremacy so this was pretty much one-sided.
Bobby Knuckles you say it yourself-one sided
Halo Jumper The way I like it...
The United States Military studied the Iran-Iraq war where the Iraqi Regular Army and the Republican Guard preformed quite well. However after that conflict, Saddam redesigned the Iraqi military to suppress internal problems, and handicapped the Regular Army to avoid revolts from his officer corps; while providing the best equipment to the Republican Guard which was a potent force. The United States over prepared and were shocked at the state of the Iraqi military, with a notable exception of the Republican Guard. The Republican Guard would at times fight to the last man, and assault American formations much larger than themselves. They took heavy losses but were a professional and dangerous organization.
america doesnt really have 'elite' units in the same way as iraq did, they have special forces sure like army rangers but they are light airborne units. a tank battalion is a tank battalion as far as the US is concerned.
@Chris Ruiz Don't forget we had superior tech, and much more stability and manpower.
Better tech can make the weakest of men, the biggest victors.
@@kunknown2340 If you didn't have superior technology, you wouldn't have won.
@@kunknown2340 better tech, better pay, better tactics. better training. You can take a coward, give him great training, and as long as he's winning the war at little risk to himself he'll keep fighting. Even if the weapons were the same as what the Iraqi's had, they'd still have lost, but they'd have taken out dozens of tanks.
usa: its over iraq i have the high ground
iraq: you underestimate my power
The T72 and everything else they had was just junk. I was there and seen what happened.
Nice video!!! Y’all should do a video on the battle of Kursk, the largest tank battle of all time!!!
Prohorovka, was it?
@@user-ph8vy4kj4g yep
Do you really think that they will make a video which glorifies Russians?
Thank you!
It wasn't
Three uploads in the space of a few hours ...
*Is it Christmas already??*
Most intense tank battle in history uhhhh did you forget the Battle Of Kursk ?
Soda King forget that battle, the India vs Pakistan Kashmir war saw the biggest tank battle in history
Pretty much, as a matter of fact.
Please tell me I didn't just get wooshed.
I don't even know if I did or not.
What is life?
@INERT No u
Space get it space war ha ha ha
The battle of kursk was the greatest battle of tank in history, nobody can deny that
My teacher took place in operation desert storm. He told us some stories about what it was like there seemed pretty scary to say the least he was a medic.
I served under McMaster when he was a Colonel. He's one of the best soldiers the Army has ever had.
Remember when Trump was trying to say that McMaster was an idiot? LOL Trump is a dumb dumb.
@@valentinetarangojr.616 Guuuuurl!!! U sassy 🤩
Everyone who severd in the US army during ww2 gets my vote for greatest of all time
I remember when Colin Powell as a 3 star and was commander of V Corps in Germany - which I was part of with 11th ACR. He left to go work at the State Dept. and quickly got his 4th star and the rest is history leading up to his becoming head of the Joint Chiefs. He like all generals was as much "a politician" as a commander.
Dude,you are as good as CNN! That's not a compliment!
You’re kinda like yarn hub, who is another really cool youtuber that explains ww2 and ww1 stories.
the M1A2 was not first tank with chobham armor. It was invented by the British and put on the challenger 1 & 2, the XM-1, M1, M1A1, and M1A2. The XM-1 was the first tank to have it implemented.
The achievements of us poor brits are never acknowledged. 😮💨
Chobham Armour was first integrated to the BRITISH Challenger 1 in 1983, please give the right nation the credit as Britain was also the one who invented it.
I know right? Americans are always appropriating other people's inventions as their own!
Just like Apple Pie which is also invented by the British!
Blitzkrieg was invented by Germany and only Germany has the right to call it Blitzkrieg, all other nations must say Lightning War or ALWAYS say that Germany invented it.
Yankz wuz KANGZ!
Amanda Franks no, it was integrated to Abram M-1’s first buddy. Nice try thi
@@themexus5369 chobham armour is named after the place it was invented. Chobham,Great Britain
Yep, Chobham armo(u)r is a British invention.
@The Infographics Show
Do you ever heard about Battle of Kursk 1943?
xShadowsithx Intense means how fast the battle is going the battle of kursk last for about 2 months
Did you ever hear of proper grammar
@@georgepatton1490 the battle can be long and intense at the same time
George Patton Kursk was still intense. If Germany had encircled the armies in Kursk it would’ve been catastrophic and Germany would have gotten back the initiative
Infographics Show: Uses DEPLETED URANIUM
Me: Otherwise known as slightly radioactive lead
I can only imagine how scary this must have been for other nations , like imagine placing bets, like there no way the US could win, then the US just curb stomps Iraq.
I mean, yeah. Underestimating an opponent is a grave mistake.
@@robert-joshuamcfaddin7041 under estimating is one thing, Russia has underestimated Ukraine in many ways. This? This wasn’t just an underestimate backfire.
@@fishfossils8858 in someway it was, other ways it wasn't. The thing they were underestimating is the thiught that we wouldn't take part in unconventional warfare.
@@robert-joshuamcfaddin7041 yes, but they also didn’t expect US to have such advanced technology, or effective command structure.
What.....
It was 30 nations against iraq
No one expected iraq to win
Saddam himself thought it was a bluff and war would never start
One part you looked over in the Battle of 73 easting, was when M1 Abrams flanked those t-72s, the m1s have automated turrets, while the t72s had manual turrets. So as the American forces flanked them and fired with ease, the Iraqis were in the t72s turning little wheels as fast as they could tryna get on target, but they never did.
The United States used the M1-A1 Abrams tank in the first gulf war. Great video though as usual! 😀 Merry Christmas!😀😀
Think they used both.
@@knightace2002 The A2 was implemented after our Urban fighting experiences in Iraq from 2003 forward.
@@yamcha8309 I'm not sure if God will, but we're doing a fair job ourselves. 👍🤪
@@yamcha8309 too bad god dosent exist :I
@@yamcha8309 Better people than you have tried.
I feel it was intense in the aspect they gained so much success. With new untested advancements in such a short time. But the argument can be made for WW2. Every 40 years we upgrade how we fight war?
These guys can find there way through a desert with gps, meanwhile my gps can’t even bring me to the right road....
military GPS is more accurate than civilian GPS and the GPS system can be forced to low accuracy in a given area so that the military have the advantage in any combat zone.
They have planes on top of them too and military gps uses coordinates
I remember watching this tank battle on the History Channel: "Greatest Tank Battles."
Edit: Everything below is wrong given the vehicle knocked out was a M3 Bradley. I am leaving it as is for context for the comment strain branching off of it.
I am sorry, but a single Abrams was knocked out in the battle. After US forces hit 70 Easting, they paused, and that gave a T72 crew a good shot on an Abrams that was illuminated against the sky. The Iraqi tank took the shot, and damaged the Abrams and wounded some of the crew. None were killed, thankfully. Spalling from the CHABRAM armor, not a penetrating shot. Anyway, smoke filled the fighting compartment, and forced the crew to evacuate.
at least somebody else knows what they're talking about lol, my dad got fed up with this video quick as he was an Abrams gunner so he knows the real facts
his buddy was in that one tank, thankfully he survived without much injury and they are still good friends today
Nicholas McFeters that Abrams was still operational lol
@@thespicyswede9302 Yeah they don't even know the correct versions of the abrams that were used during this war. We used M1IP's and M1A1's. The M1A2's first war time deployment was The Iraq war in 2003 if I remember correctly.
Nicholas McFeters except he said destroyed. None were destroyed.
Uptonogood Ashe The M1A1 and the M1A2 were developed a year apart. It is true that the majority of the war was fought with M1A1’s, but in this situation M1A2’s were used.
cool vid and all but the tanks you used in the animation for the republican guard looked like a challenger 2 sometimes. but sick vid
What programs did you use for the animation?
Thank you
Hat trick! Thanks Infographic Show!
Thanks for watching! 👍
The British 1st Armoured Division was involved. And Chobham armour is a British creation.
The thing about modern tanks is the guns on the American tanks are German they armor is British the machine guns are Belgium the engine is American
I dont think he said that armor was developed by America. Simply that it was first used on American Abram tanks. That is true
yeah quite a few allies were in the battle aswell
@@kosrules1884 but most nato tanks share other countries parts
@@AlkalineGamingHD nope chieftain...
Whenever I hear about the Middle East/Oil/ Conflict, I am reminded by a quote, "The Spice Must Flow."
I was there and on the frontline. Besides what this video described, we also won because we crushed the Iraqi army's moral. They would come out with hands raised kissing our hand in gratitude of having saved them from starving to death. I respect anyone willing to put on a uniform, but you sometimes have to know when it's time to raise your hands.
Were they starving because we were bombing all their supplies ? We didn't let anything through ?
@@frankmontez6853 Yes, all of the supply routes were destroyed. So they just gave up once we arrived.
Sgt Ramos Tank E24 everything was planned and executed correctly from beginning to end. Cutting off resupply is one of the first tasks to achieve.
We didn't have M1A2's during Desert Storm. We had M1A1 Heavy's. The heavys did have the depleted uranium armor which is why they were called M1A1 Heavy. The M1A2'S didn't get field until the mid 90's. They were still being tested in 93 when I was stationed at Ft.Knox.
It should be noted that the A2 version of the M1 Abrams did not exist at the time of Desert Storm; it was developed *afterward* in the mid to late 1990's. It did see combat in the second Gulf War of 2003 however.
You got one small thing wrong. The M1A2 Abram is a newer tank to today. The tank the U.S. was using in the battle of 1973 was the M1A1, the A2 being the upgraded model.
Wiley Garner Yup!
2 small things.The most intense tank battle was the battle of kursk in 1942.
Woaw this war took less time than school.
That time the US used blitzkrieg tactics lmao
True, but too be fair, we also wanted the war to be over quick.
@@howardbaxter2514 Well every side want's the war to be over if they have the capacity to blitz the enemy...
Inspired by Erwin Rommel. That's a fact.
@@JakeTheTankmaster alot of us tech was inspired or created by germans
I remember watching a documentary about this war. On it they covered a story about how captured Iraqi solder being loaded up in a Bradley asked the Americans why they had a picture of rommel in their vehicle and they replied something along the lines that they respected his strategies and learned from him.
Hello there, *General Kenobi*
You are an old one!
When your enemies are level 3 but you are 99
The battle of 73 easting could be a preview of what could happen when NATO tanks engage russian tanks.
You should talk more about battles and brave soldiers from countries other than the US.
An interesting one could be Brigadier General Avigdor kahalani (Lieutenant Colonel during his most famous battle) who is said to have singlehandedly saved Israel in the Yom Kippur war.
He was in command of an armored Brigade that faced off against far superior numbers of Syrian tanks and troops (50000 troops and 1200 tanks), and despite heavy losses, he managed to reorganize the troops in the area, even rallying in battalions and tanks from other brigades, and managed to overturn a hopeless battle. His tank alone quickly took out 4 enemy tanks from a point-blank range of several tens of meters during the first parts of the battle.
After the war Kahalani received the highest Israeli military decoration, the medal of valor, and the valley in which the battle took place was renamed "Emek Ha-Bacha", ("Valley of the Tears") due to the hundreds of destroyed and abandoned Syrian tanks left there.
The US is the leader. Start telling the truth, finally.
@@ronaldmarcks1842 the US is nothing special
Ah. An admission of failure!
My father fought in desert storm as a sniper, and my mother worked on missiles that hit the earth, and shot little clusters into the air to take out enemy missile fire. Their best friend was a tanker, and he lost his life to miscommunication. His name was Manuel Davila, and in my hometown of Gillette Wyoming, he has a statue just before the cemetery. You can find his picture outside the gym, of Twin Spruce Junior High. So when I saw this? This reminded me of a history that my father, Manuel, and my mother got to live. May Davila rest in peace, and may you keep bringing joy and wonder to people. Be well.
I hope rest in peace the thousands of lives your country's army has killed.
@@nsrbk hey it’s war, what you are gonna do
@@nsrbk Lol, are you salty that your "army" got smoked?
Iraqis: "ah yes, we will deploy our tanks in defensive positions along the road"
Americans: "Roads? Where we're going we don't need ROADS!!"