Lori Vallow Daybell's Arizona attorney argues cameras should not be allowed in court
Vložit
- čas přidán 1. 07. 2024
- #eastidahonews #lorivallowdaybell #crime
Lori Vallow Daybell's Arizona attorney argued Tuesday that cameras should not be allowed in court. Reporter Justin Lum responded to the request. Watch in the video player above.
► Support East Idaho News: www.eastidahonews.com/donate/
► Subscribe to East Idaho News: czcams.com/users/Eastidahone...
► Get East Idaho News merch: www.eastidahonews.com/shop/
► Download our free app: marketplace-redirect.doapps.co...
► Like us on Facebook: / eastidahonews
► Follow us on X: / eastidnews
► Follow us on Instagram: / eastidahonews
► Subscribe to our free newsletter: www.eastidahonews.com/newslet...
She's a convicted murderer. The public needs to know and see the process
The trial is public. The right of the public to know has been fulfilled in trials before there was ever televised. The media and public are allowed to sit and be present for the entire trial.
Televised is not the same thing as "public"
When you televise the proceedings, it changes the dynamic as attorneys and others become conscious of the cameras and perform for the public.
What about JJ, Tylee’s, Charles’ and Tammy’s constitutional rights!?
@@gailhawthorne8856he had the audacity to say the coverage isn’t dignified--what? She murdered people, and was convicted of it.she didn’t care for the dignity of her victims
@@gailhawthorne8856 That is always the go-to response which is emotional but doesn't really contribute to the discussion.
You being able to view a trial on tv in no way helps the victims or deceased in a case.
It is a given that someone's rights have been violated if they have been murdered. It is also a given that whatever punishment is ascribed will not match the violation perpetrated against the victim.
All is not made right. Everyone is not made to feel completely better by punishing the accused.
This is the real world. And in our system. a trial is "public" if there is seating made available to the "public".
There is no (and never has been) any constitutional right to televising a trial and that has nothing to do with the "rights" of a deceased victim.
Frankly, this convicted murderer should be shown, the public have the right to see the court and justice being served. Her defence lawyer has obviously fallen prey to her manipulation, he seems very familiar with his client “Lori”. I can’t help thinking she doesn’t want cameras because of her vanity, she has aged in jail and can’t get her Botox, also why should she be allowed to wear what she wants in court? Orange is her new wardrobe, she needs to get used to it.
She’s a murderer and already vilified. Camera’s please.
😂😂😂😂😂🫡👏🏽🙌🏽👍🏽
Yessss!!
And already convicted of killing her children
Courts are public and should be transparent!
That and the public is paying for her defense!!
HEAR, HEAR!!! we pay for it, we should witness the accountability!!!
And would pay for yours if you couldn’t.
THIS 👆👆👆 100% FULL STOP
She has no rights she killed two beautiful children
And her husband and conspired to kill her lover’s wife and her niece’s husband and possibly her niece’s children. She lost her rights the second she took Charles’ life.
Our Constitution gives her the right to due process. YOU don't get to decide her guilt or innocence. A JURY does. YOU have those same rights. If YOU are ever indicted or arrested, I'd bet you'd be screaming for YOUR rights, right?
Those people with this ridiculous understanding of American justice scare me.
And two husbands
She has rights, but I don't see how the camera inside the courtroom is a problem for her. She loves the attention.
Once again lori’s shows her entitlement and her inability to face any kind of consequences
She doesn’t want anyone staring at her. She looks awful.
Well she did get found guilty in Idaho. So, she is facing consequences. And that was without cameras.
Death threats
You said it best!!
I totally agree with you.She's always acting entitled
She just doesn't like folks seeing how old she's looking..... smh 🙄
Bingo!
lol
Her inside is showing on her outside.
correct
I argue cameras should be in the courtrooms! The public has a right to know what’s going on with a murderer!
Why would the court protect her above anyone else.
Because, as a defense attorney, it’s embarrassing to defend her.
Criminals have more rights than victims
THIS
Exactly!
Everyone gets treated same and this trial will be televised! The media will fight for it! No worries! But some of the celeb factor can ruin a jury before trial with the crazy coverage so it’s a consideration!
She is a convicted multiple murderer and prisoner, so she should have to dress in her prison attire.
Cameras should be allowed.
Not by law! She will be in reg clothes!
@@Juke582 "Not by law" what?
She wasn't convicted for murder by law?
I agree with you. That was one of the FIRST things she requested at her trial for the children was to be able to wear street clothes. She is so vein person. She should absolutely have to wear the ORANGE clothes she deserves.
She shouldn't have any rights
The police let charles down when he asked for help. Please dont let the court let him down again. Let the people see what she had done to charles.
Yes totally agree
I`m busy liking all the comments. But for you, I also want to tell you how much it means what you said. It is so sooo heartbreaking to see the police`s neglect when Charles reached out for help, besides reaching out to family members. And so you`re right, the court should not let him down again. God bless you😌🙏
Agreed!!! Well said!! Justice for Charles! The public needs to know what she did to Charles too!!!!
Amen, girl.
Yes please 😊
Lori should only wear ORANGE
She is lucky Joe Arpaio is no longer Sheriff. She would definately be wearing orange jail garb during her trial.
Poor Lori not being able to wear normal clothes - perhaps they should strip her of her makeup as well. Lol
@@jewelgazer,
It’s not L’Oreal , she’s not worth it !
Orange is the new black.
@@barbarabrooks4015NO she would not. She has a legal right to wear street clothes.
She loves the attention so what’s the problem??? We want to see justice for Charles!!!! 😡
I agree with you Juke582, AND they should make her sit in during the trial
She loves attention when she can flaunt herself . She’s so vain, she knows she’s looking rough. Thats the ONLY reason she doesn’t want cameras
she wanted a day out of her cell at the tax payers expense.
She wants to flirt with her lawyer in private. 🤦🏻♀️
Yup!
She is evil
She should have to sit there. The whole country had a eye out for her children. How freaking dare her 😡
Really? Often "undignified "?? How much DIGNITY did she show Tylee and JJ and Charles??!
Let's not forget her speech in the last court case regarding her "Dear friend Tammy." It was proven that she was having an affair with Tammy's husband, purchasing wedding rings and wedding apparel before Tammy was murdered. She needs to put on her orange jumpsuit, sit down in court and face the truth of her multiple crimes.
@@user-mj3pl4ws7p💯💯💯💯💯💯‼️
@@user-mj3pl4ws7p you're absolutely right!
As a lawyer, I am satisfied I made the right decision in NOT defending an evil person. Her lawyer needs to come out of fantasyland. Court hearings are open to the public. Period. We, the public, want courtrooms to have cameras in them.
Why anyone would want to defend her is beyond me,She is pure evil hiding behind God to do it,
Iris - You can’t be a lawyer! You don’t understand the justice system is ensuring fair trial for both sides and presumed innocent until found guilty by a jury of peers! Many defense lawyers do their job to ensure fairness to the accused regardless of their feelings or knowledge of innocence or guilty to carry out the justice! Many work for justice against the guilty they know about to make sure they are held accountable while the lawyer still does their job! Some have admitted this on court TV in interviews! It’s not that they believe their client is innocent! It’s carrying out fairness in the system so someone is not railroaded falsely by a dishonest judge or prosecutor! If you are a lawyer you fully understand this! Duh 🙄
You aren’t credible here to educated people who watch these trials and learn a LOT! Certainly we see lots of liars on defense with cockamamie excuses for murderers, but understand it’s part of evening the fairness factor! And the prosecution has to prove their case beyond those defense lies!
@Juke582 Yikes?! She can still be a lawyer and allowed to have an opinion 😂 Don't need to be so rude about it lolol
@@Amz_I_am22that wasn’t rude. It was factual.
Lori’s attorneys are public defenders, a difficult, worthy profession/calling.
She murdered her kin in the most horrific way. She doesn’t deserve any discretion now.
Very true,she killed,dismembered & burnt her own daughter& suffocated a little boy. She shouldn’t be handled w “ kid gloves”.
The courts belong to the citizens, not the accused. Sit down, counselor.
Check your American history textbook again. People are presumed innocent before been proven guilty.
Good point!
She has given up her rights as a convicted murderer to have any votes as to what should be allowed in court .
She is not considered a member of society .
Exactly!!!!!!!!!
They don't allow cameras in federal trials
She is already in prison for life so why does she need to be protected from people seeing this trial. People want to watch justice happening because this crime was so hard to comprehend. Watching the trials helps us see our justice system in action. It reassures us that our system works.
And what about Charles and his family....Do they have any rights???
Oh, don't you "even" invalidate Justin Lum. He knows more about the case than the lawyer does on his best day.
Amen, and the best reporter.
Barbara along with Nate
Allow cameras
The public has a right to know what’s happening in this case!
Or at the expense of being able to get a fair jury! We won’t see the Indiana teen murder case because of the mass media nonsense by that defense lying about it!
The coverage isn't "excessive", there's just coverage.
Lori is just really really angry because in Idaho she didn't know anyone.
But Arizona is home.
That's the place where she'd been lording it over other people for years.
Going around announcing how "special" and pious and godly she was. How SHE was SO special and godly that SHE was the right person to judge everyone else.
She LOVED being the centre of attention back then.
But NOW, when the real story comes out, her extreme greed, her marital unfaithfulness and fornicating, and her murdering her children for their few thousands in social security ....she's whining a different tune.
Yep! She sure was ready for the cameras in her wheel of fortune days. Or while having an affair with Chud, or while going on podcasts! Now because her real self has been exposed all of a sudden she wants privacy? Nope!!
THIS!
@@tianna1116 Absolutely..same goes for she when mincing around in a bikini as a Mrs Texas wannabee.
Her self-adoring grasping for attention was one of the roots of this entire ugly sad story.
She's just mad that people are not praising and worshipping her anymore lol😂
When you have nothing with which to defend your client, you don't want your abject failure televised. I get that.
Good point
😂passionate High 5 to you and your great comment!
I agree with that assessment but too bad for him!
Well said.
LOL. You know who vilified Lori??? LORI! You know why people are negative towards Lori? MURDER! Don't do the crime if you don't want to do the time!
Well said!!
She did that to herself
She’s a criminal!so tough she has to put up with it.
She so privileged as a goddess. JJ and Tylee was not considered nor Charles.
It’s a constitutional right to see trials
The constitutional right is fulfilled in the fact that spectators and media are allowed to be present. That's different from televised.
The constitutional right was respected in trials before any were ever televised. When you put cameras in the courtroom suddenly attorneys and others want to "play to the cameras" and the judicial process becomes entertainment. There is not any constitutional right to feed the fascination of the public to be entertained.
lol, not in the way you are thinking...
Read your American history textbook again.
@@dmichael100have to agree. Witnesses could be intimated. Jurors put in jeopardy etc. Don't turn these into a side show by the public. Sooo many more cases need covered too
Let's report it. Get to the truth and move on. Other victims out there missing and killed need their stuff solved etc. And public attention all the extra help ETc. jmo
Oh please! Like anyone is going to kill her! Unless it's another prisoner.
That is very possible in AZ but I think she is in solitary confinement for her own protection. They should let the wolves get her in prision like they did Jeffery Dalmer.
"LOri"??????????? 🤢🤢Is she his girlfriend or something? Most ridiculous way to try to humanize a convicted child killer ever.
EXCELLENT STATEMENT...
Did she charm her lawyer ?
She's humiliated now that Chad lost and got DP.
I think she is happy about that. On that jail recording where Lori and Chad talked about building a pool and plans that was lori setting up Chad. Chad was hesitant to talk about it but Lori pushed the conversation knowing it was a recorded jail call. The police began investigating chad’s yard the next day
Nope! They have not spoken at all since Chads arrest! Stop just saying bullcrap!
@@Juke582The call was before his arrest...
You tell em Justin L. 👏 😊 she's brought all this on herself.. vile human.also ..she did exactly this before her last trial honestly ...she did what she did and that's a fact..
She showed no remorse in her statement after being found guilty. That’s on her. She created the narrative.
Lori Vallow's sense of entitlement has no bounds...
Facts
She could have said: GUILTY !!! And avoid the pain, money and time CAMERAS!!!!!!
What happened to the rights of her children? *She took it away* Therefore, she deserves nothing!
She's pushing this for her own agenda. She obviously doesn't want the world to see what she looks like now, after months of no beauty treatments, hair colouring and whatever else she used to be able to do..
she wanted a day out of her cell at the tax payers expense.
Right! On point! She`s obviously not aware that all of her ugly mugshots already spread all over the world! LMAO 😂Joyful Hello from Switzerland! Hahaha
What does she expect after the crimes she's convicted of!
She should have no more rights than anyone else . Cameras are in courtrooms …
Disgusting that attorneys continue to argue that Lori Daybell is special and entitled. Family members of the victims continue to have to travel at their own expense to these trials.
And she has already been found guilty of MURDER. This is disgusting!
Yes, Judge, please allow cameras!!!
As a Maricopa county resident AND tax payer, I demand cameras! I want to see how my $$$ is being used. News flash, Lori: If you play stupid games, you win stupid prizes!
She has no rights being a convicted felon.
She has many rights, but not about being cameras in the courts isn't one of them. IMHO.
Nor respect the court!!
Right on!
she's not convicted in Arizona. She still has constitutional rights with respect to this trial
@@Littleangel_-jp4xb all right killer lover!
Don’t hide her crimes!! Daylight is the best disinfectant!
NOW Lori wants to be dark….. 🤔
He really did NOT just say that video coverage has been "consistently negative " toward her, and she's been "vilified " 😂 😂 GTFO
You know who WEREN'T vilifying her? Charles, Tylee and JJ. Tylee protected her mom, Charles was trying to get her help and JJ loved her as well. And for that, she vilified THEM and got them killed.
Cameras, Please. She's already a convicted murderer.
Transparency is important, especially now. Restores people’s faith in the very thorough process that happens in the courts paid for by TAXPAYERS’ dollars!!
No! She got away with that the first time. Please don't give her what she wants! I/We want cameras!
American public was assaulted by her actions. We are invested and want to watch justice for Charles.
AMEN!!!
How does the public know that you guys are being fair, upholding justice, and conducting with proper process without being able to watch it?
I think this young, cocky attorney needs to get used to the fact that some of these cases will have more coverage than others, and if he is to continue practicing law in this country, he’ll need to get used to it.
This is all so childish and immature. Typical Lori!
Agreed.
she wanted a day out of her cell at the tax payers expense.
SHE SHOULD BE IN PRISON CLOTHING!! She was found guilty in other cases! What is happening?!
that was other cases. She is not convicted yet in this one. Orange jumpsuit during a trial could bias the jury. Sounds ridiculous to you but it's the way it is.
This is a different state
Not by law! You can’t poison the water that way about their past in a new separate criminal charge! She gets to be treated innocent until proven guilty! It’s the justice system not a prison meeting! Duh 🙄 watch court tv and learn!
@@Juke582be nice!!
I see Kay and Colby in the courtroom today. Justin made valid points and Lori's attorney's should keep his nose out of all of this. Lori is a cold blooded killer and everyone should be allowed to see her. Her case brought this world together and we should all witness Lori's downfall even further. The only reason for the change of venue was because Rexburg is so small, everyone knows everyone.
Charles was murdered in Arizona.
The world already knows where her kids were buried so why hide now.
Imagine vilifying a convicted murderer 😮
Right?😄...5 victims
What a concept!!!
Lori Shallow vilified herself !!!
Right. So have other convicted murderers been allowed to wear street clothes?!?
@@user-jy3zl2vp4b Especially after being convicted with a life sentence.
The laundry folding side camera was my favorite part of this whole thing.
Is that what that was?? Lol I couldn't describe it!
@@RayneLainey😂😂😂😂 What am I watching? Why is that lady on side doing laundry? I thought I was seeing things. 😂
@@lovewins8238 Same!! I came to comments to check my sanity🤣🤣
The state of this internal recording proving exactly why professional cameras should be allowed in the courtroom!!
Please, oh plrase good judge allow camera coverage on every little bit of Lori's trial, expose here complete wickedness.
You go Justin. Love your coverage on this case. your a real professional
11:59 Ahh, the whole argument was because Lori wants to get dressed up for the cameras.
It's much more than that; she wants to be dressed up and probably made-up by a make-up artist.
Geez, she has No Remorse. If she did, she would've pleaded guilty!
What a filthy liar of a lawyer. Don't give him an inch.
Pretty sure the jury pool in AZ is larger than ID
Yo, that's what happens when you are an infamous murderer (of your own children).
Poor Lori
I don’t fell sorry for her
She’s a killer
She’s a monster
FEEL not fell.
So wat if she receives death threats. She brought death to so many ppl. Besides she has 21 lives
She’s an exalted being 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
A convicted murderer....no rights!!!!
She has many rights.
We already know....so show her case on video
It shouldn't make any difference. This case has been covered for five years, so what's the point in hiding it now? How can it damage a fair trial when jury isn't allowed to watch footage of this particular trial anyway. Yes, she has rights, but I think that doesn't include the right to anonymity or a non transparent trial.
Oh my God, she laughed after her attorney said there is widespread coverage of Lori! She is a monster!!!
Big round of applause to Justin Lum and Nate Eaton for fighting the "good" fight to keep these cases in the public view ❤
Cameras please. Justice or cameras? She gave up her rights, so camers in the courtroom. What threats did she get? No harm will come to her, she is protected, big deal. Cameras.
She has many rights.
First should be the rights of the families that cannot attend. Cameras allow them to see justice in the making as it happens. Lori took away the rights of those families to ever see the killed family members!
Show and shame ,stop letting criminals hide away ,they should face up to what they have done and look the relatives in the eye and not be allowed to be a COWARD !
After what she did ,i would be surprised if she didn't get death threats!🤷
Does this young man know she is a Convicted Murderer of 3 people in Idaho.
Your honor we don’t want our sociopath of a client to be caught constantly smiling on camera
Nobody likes a baby killer.
Nope. Look at Casey Anthony as an example
Wow and arguing with the judge in the middle of the judges reply...... these are lawyers not children make them accountable
why not allow cameras? She's already convicted on the other charges! Does it really matter? She'll never see the light of day again anyway! 🙄
Oh please..... she sure is full of herself..... the more we allow this crap the worse the criminals behave
You Go Justin Lum , the family deserve all rights involved and to be present and if not present be able to view whenever there is a hearing via zoom or anyway it may be viewed .
She made up her own beliefs and justified murdering her loved ones. How could coverage not be negative?
He needs to NOT CALL HER LORI! He needs to maintain professional distance.
I prefer Lori to Mrs Vallow because how dare she still carry that good man’s name… 😒
I watched her interaction with this new lawyer at another hearing, and there was definitely intimacy boundary issues. I felt they were flirting.
@@BaldybotsShe has done that with every cop and lawyer from the get go. If the police wouldn’t have been so enamored we wouldn’t be here today and Charles would be alive!
@@dawndavis647 Fully Agree!
@@JackieOlantern She still is Mrs DAYBELL as she pointed out in different hearings that´s how she should be called.She is not divorced.
Nope nope and nope to everything this defense attorney is whining about.
Your point? She slaughtered her own children. So yes, media coverage is going to be very negative.
No sympathy.
Justus for Charles!!!!!!
"Maligning her" Well YEAH, she murdered children and does not have a bit of remorse. That "poor Lori" routine is ridiculous. The jury pool would have to live on Mars to not know SOMETHING about this.
Cameras should be allowed!
I see Brandon B, Kay & I think Larry.
GOVERNMENT TRANSPARENCY!
Thats with everyone in cases like this. She isn't special
Hey lawyer, your client is a monster with 4D level dark! Of course all media will follow and ensure people and her victims that she will be in jail until the end of her life. It’s people and her victims right to watch her case
so it seems Lorihor doesn't want everyone seeing what a monster she is.. funny that.
SHE DOES NOT WANT TO SHOW SHE HAS NOT HAD BOTOX OR FILLER IN YEARS...
@@mohawkmom4119haha of course
She should have thought about being subjected to public scrutiny before she killed her OWN children. For goodness sake, she has still not accepted responsibility for her actions
who keeps clicking on a participant?? it is frustrating when watching it
OMG YES!! I kept thinking can you just set it up and leave it be?? We had randos in a side shot and then the constant window changing. Who was in charge of this lol
I'm wondering about the woman who appears to be putting on a shirt.
Somebody's EMBARRASSED
FINALLY
She is guilty of killing her children and the public needs to hear what is discussed in a hearing associated with her evil!
allow cameras
I wonder if she's also trying to get out of the viewing evidence again.
Gee how dare the public vilify a woman who has been charged and convicted of brutally murdering three people two of those being her own sweet innocent children
4 including Charles. Maybe 5 if one could prove her involvement in her 3rd husband Joe Ryan’s death. Found guilty of JJ, Tylee and Tammy’s deaths.