Flagrant vs The Andrew Schulz Show
Vložit
- čas přidán 4. 03. 2024
- The Flagrant Podcast has evolved since it’s started. Although it’s become more sophisticated, with the fake laughter and the egocentric personality of Andrew Schulz, it’s starting to feel like a cheesy late night show. Meanwhile Alex is starting to look more out of place with the more serious Flagrant episodes.
#andrewschulz #flagrant #comedypodcast
DISCLAIMER -
All content in this video is used for educational purposes and is believed to fall under the principles of fair use. No copyright infringement is intended. If you are the copyright owner and have concerns about the use of your material in this video please send me an email at thegoodrant@gmail.com.
Schultz fake laugh sounds like Arthur from Joker when he’s leaving the changing room having a mental breakdown
His laugh has reached full Bert.
When I discovered Schultz was a 40 yr old man, I couldn't believe it at first
Jesus Christ. I Had no idea
Their podcast is completely unwatchable
Tell that to the two million people who watch weekly
I'm very curious why you think that?
Can you give specific details?
1:27 "at times has the sense of humour someone in his 20s"
I would say it's more the sense of humour of a 15 year old. He and all his "boys" all seem so immature. It gets old real quick.
It seems like he only keeps Akaash around because he'll never see him as a threat to his own comedy career. As you pointed out, he keeps him in his place. Such an awkward dynamic for a podcast.
Alex gives off a "try too hard to be cool" type of vibe. I started seeing it from the Dillon Danis pod and since then.
They all give off that vibe. None of them seem genuine, but the characters they play are unfunny and cringe.
Dudes a cornball.
@@deecocoa mark is cool, his podcast is great. I agree about the rest
Alex is also casually rcist at times. Typical of people like him
Racist to who? @@trentonwalker8602
I love that people still make the Shane hates Andrew comments. Dude just put Drew in his brand new show he got on Netflix lol
Not only that their both doing shows together in staples center and Vegas
“Ahh-ha-ah-ah-ah-ahhhhhh”
The laugh happened as I read this 😂 spot on
Schulz is an embodiment of the "Chapelle mic-leg-slap". He tries to force you to laugh and fall into his frame every possible way he can.
this isnt a shot at chapelle right? hes objectively the goat
Can’t wait for the day this channel completely blows up! Love your stuff, dude. Keep it up
Thanks man I really appreciate that!🙏
Anyone else full body cringe whenever anyone on fragrant starts laughing
Schultz laugh the laugh from the beginning of Feel Good Inc. I’d rather listen to Gorillaz.
Accurate
The Steiny interaction is either Shultz projecting at an incredible level or the most ironic full circle moment in the industry.
We live in a society.
Who is this? The off brand podcast cringe channel? You basically copied his exact mannerisms, way of speaking, using the exact same clips on the same topic , etc
Alex really missed the point on the future argument hahaha
Not a fan of Alex as a character on the pod; but I really feel like people were actually missing his point more.
Can you explain how it's not a double standard to portray a character in a song vs to portray a character in a movie?
Genuinely looking for logical reasoning, not w emotions mixed in.
@@Note10plusAura it’s obvious when a film or stand up act is fictional or satire. it’s different with musicians especially when they have much to gain from a facade that ensures credibility and clout.
so then why not also scrutinize the writers and producers of fictional movies that have negative messages?... i think they used to back when there was more of a Christian presence in the culture.
@Jcabrera1206 yes it is usually more obvious in a movie, agreed;
but the only reason it's obvious is because WE have grown, even from a young age, to Realize it's a story and not reality.
It's not actors or movies doing this For us.
Regulations or governments or music artists didn't do this for us either.
Almost every single kid thinks a movie is real at some point but we quickly learn otherwise.
The burden should fall on Ourselves,
to learn and realize fact from fiction as we grow, aquire knowledge from people-public or peers, establish rationale, and gain common sense from the world around us..
What they are saying is this:
Any artist rapping about explicit fictional stories must be Held Accountable
For Other People's Choices
in their daily life because his song has influenced somebody.
I can hardly even wrap my head around something like that-
Expecting that a rapper needs to be forced to take responsibility for Me taking Xanax and going to the e.r.?
..whether I heard it on his song or not does not change the fact that the fault lies with me for Doing stupid shlt, instead of just Listening to stupid shit in a song.
Peoples choices are their own to make AND Be Responsible for;
Old and Young.
..Not the creators of the media we enjoy.
We have been going down this path of constant insinuations, from every direction, that we all Need to be
* Protected from Ourselves.*
And all it's doing is creating circumstance where people, young or not, are no longer Required to pay attention, learn, or experience.
This seems to be a terrible direction; what do you think?
my dislike was very sudden and i noticed it shortly after they started filming on their latest set
They all cornballs if you ask me.
I honestly would love for someone to call out Shultz irl because he has to know how fake and unfunny he is
i actually don't hate Alex's point against Russ
John Wick is a bad example, could have used wolf of wall street
Alex was great when he was behind the camera, chiming in at the right times, but doesn’t bring enough to the table when he’s just a guest
Alex makes podcast unwatchable. His voice something about it nails down chalkboard
In my opinion if you like Andrew but hate Fragrant, watch / listen to Brilliant Idiots. Hate him or love him Charlemagne is very skilled and seasoned when it comes to talking on a mic. His push backs on Andrew are genuine and doesnt agree just to agree. Andrew doesnt control the room because he doesnt hold the same amount of power on BI sitting next to the powerhouse that is Charla. It makes Andrew WAY more digestable and likeable.
It’s the same as it was 6 years ago. By end of the year y’all gonna go after Theo and then Shane and end of next year Tosh lol
The worst thing to me is the disrespect to the furniture. It’s for lounging, not smacking the crap out of it every time you laugh.
Thanks for another great video.
Thanks for stopping by man!
Schulz coming for Bert's title of worst forced laugh in the universe
It’s literally a LoLcow of a podcast. Between them and anything Brendan Shaun is putting out humongous lolcows
I think you are making a decent point about Alex. That being said he did a really good job today with the FBI agent
Thanks. He has his good eps for sure. Maybe he saw my video..
Andrew really ruined that Tim Dillon spot :(
Well the Original show Flagrant 2 was started as a Sports podcast and then they changed the name to just flagrant. When it was the the spots podcast that’s when it was at its best
Schultz’s laugh is more annoying than Jimmy Fallon’s and that’s a bad sign
This podcast use to be 2 people (comedians )discussing current events and some cultural stuff. It is now an Andrew show and that show blows
I sometimes get the impression that Akaash is hanging on to the pod because it makes him money but spiritually hes outgrown it. I would like to see all of them branch out or take a shift in a direction that’s more evolved. A new chapter is needed.
Minute 4:00 is gold.
Im a brilliant idiot fan I could never get into the pod even back when it was sports based just cause NO ONE on the show gives Andy push back. They all just agree with him.
It’s the new popular thing to hate on flagrant I see 😂😂😂
Oh my god another Flagrant video but yet the podcast is still doing just fine
Shultz is a ghoul
I can’t tell who forces their laugh harder… Andrew or Bert?
Not a fan of Alex as a character on the pod; but I really feel like people were actually missing his point more.
Can anybody explain how it's not a double standard
to portray a character in a song
vs
to portray a character in a movie
Genuinely looking for logical reasoning, not w emotions mixed in.
Sure. I get Alex’s point. And sorry if this is a long reply. John Wick is movie character. Even children know that those are actors. That’s not the case with musicians. Even though musicians can talk about whatever experiences even it’s not theirs and can talk about stories that are completely made up. However historically with rap those stories are typically under the assumption that they’re based on real life. A huge appeal of rappers is that they are credible. If 50 cent lied about getting shot 9 times then his appeal would have dropped significantly. Even if his music would have been good. All of sudden we wouldn’t believe that he was really about that lifestyle. So the impression of rappers is that they are being themselves. Future rapping about doing drugs is obviously a bad influence. But still you could argue if that was his actual lifestyle then he’s just talking about his personal experiences…but that isn’t the case. In fact Alex says at the end as a defense to Future that “he’s just talking about his experiences” (NOT TRUE) So Alex even made a point against Future because that’s the defense. Those experiences aren’t his. It’s fake. He’s selling an image that is not only fake but a bad influence and it’s purely for personal gain... It’s shady to say the least. The whole defense of gangster rap or rappers who talk about doing drugs is that “hey it’s their experience they should be able to talk about their life however they choose to live it”. No-one’s arguing that he should get locked up for it or get banned. But it’s irresponsible and just a dick move.
@@TheGoodRant That brings me to one of my main points..
If a rapper tells a story based on fiction, who now should have the burden of Others' Decisions fall on him -because he's a bad influence;
Then Why would that Not apply to an identical rapper, telling the same story, in all the same ways,
except his is 100% true?
If somebody starts popping pills because he heard it on that rappers song, then wouldn't That rapper, telling his real experiences, Also be a bad influence for doing so?
And if he IS in fact also a bad influence, then that escalates from
"Fake rappers shouldn't be able to rap about bad shit and act like it's real because it apparently influences some people"
To
"All Rappers shouldn't be able to have the freedom to express Any explicit experiences,
Real or Fake.
(Because they Both apparently influence some people.)
Or the alternative
All Rappers should be Held Responsible for other peoples actions if they portray an explicit persona.
Including talking about an old version of yourself when you did grimy shit in a previous life- because why?
Because It Will Influence people; and we need somebody else to protect Us from Ourselves.
I honestly think he does a lot of these things to drive up engagement on his videos. A lot of CZcamsrs say wrong info in videos because everyone comments correcting them
adding the two haters on the other couch made a big difference. does anybody like those guys or genuinely care about their opinion on anything?
I like Mark on the podcast. He's funny and got lots of interesting insights. And I've noticed to when Andrew was out of line he's not playing a long and rather keep silent.
Thank you. I can’t watch Flagrant anymore. Schulz selling out MSG? Amy Schumer did too. And we know how unfunny she is. Don’t equate popularity with being funny
The real stand ups don’t want to be a podcaster. Unless they need to it for $. There are exceptions to this rule like Bill Burr. Burr is brilliant enough to have a podcast while filming a movie and still go to The Cellar in the village and kill with new material. Louis CK did a brilliant pod with Shane on our Presidents .. but it was a finite podcast. And yiu can also catching him in the cellar trying out new material. Crafting his art.
Does Andrew think he’s at the level of Shane? Burr? Louis? Does he think SNL is going to call him? No that won’t happen.
11:43 not a stupid take . It's a take gun don't kill people people kill people . Also I don't agree wit him blaming parents tho
A youtune channel called MIA official has stolen a portion of this video for a shane gillis comp thought id let you know
Schultz dresses like a Putz with those short pants, that haircut and that mustache lost most of the respect I once had for him.
It’s crazy because it used to be a good show.
Sammy Maudlin and Bobby Bittman,
Alex is like the social justice crybaby friend of the group that you have to watch out what you say around
Like the fresh n fit episode 😂
@@trentonwalker8602 that’s the exactly episode I had in mind when typing that out lmfao!!!! This whole cast is washed
Social justice crybaby lol. I love that
Epiphany schulz ignites cringe induced sweats man
Last point was weak on ur part.
I don’t think I’ve laughed at anything they talk about in like a year.
I couldn't make it through 20 minutes of the podcast when I first watched it. The constant talking over each other and fake laughter makes it unlistenable. But, I have to say, it's not gotten better at all. It's gotten worse to the point where it's so bad that it actually results in good content (like this) making fun of how bad it is.
All of Schulz's attempts at racial "humour" fall flat. His room-temperature takes on non-American cultures don't just reek of ignorant edgelordism, they so obviously show how desperate he is to come off as outre and provocative. I used to like this guy and his Internet comedy. Now, every time he opens his mouth, he snitches on himself. As for the rest of the Flagrant boyband, they're all human ad-lib machines; rejects from a reality TV show MTV would've cancelled after one season in the early 2000s. At least Adam Levine's supporting cast can play their instruments. Can't say the same about Schulz's beneficiaries.
I haven’t been able to watch this dumpster fire in like 2 years.
The second time I saw akash do the crazy Shultz laugh and leg grabbing I was like nawwww I’m over the age of 11 so I’m not into this.
Schultz is so annoying that i can't watch a video describing how annoying he is.
Lmfaooo
Lmao there's levels to his annoyingness
Honestly, I don’t really agree with the Alex criticism. I can see what you’re saying; he does go a little quiet in more nuanced pods, but I don’t think he should sit it out or anything. He can be anything from easily one of the best parts of the pod to just a little quiet. Nothing too wrong there
You're a hater 😒
Who cares don't watch it
The point Alex is trying to make in that Russ discussion is actually valid. If an adult takes any particular drugs because of the image of a certain rapper then that’s on that adult for being easily persuaded in your life choices by people that hold no actual relevance in your life. You can’t expect everybody and their momma to be the good example YOU want to see in the world, it just doesn’t work like that. Future’s audience gives him relevance because of the image he sells, doesn’t matter if it’s true or not because that’s all just an assumption anyway. Truth is you never know and it shouldn’t even matter. Kids on the other hand should be made aware that not everything you see and especially on the internet is real. People have a right to lie about almost everything regarding themselves and exercise that right daily. Don’t be naive and don’t make stupid choices based on other people’s stupid choices, take responsibility and make stupid choices yourself instead.🫡
That’s a completely valid argument. It goes without saying that parents should teach their kids to not be influenced by someone like Future. And no-one is saying that Future shouldn’t have the right to do it. We’re saying that it’s just a dick move. The historic defense of rappers who are a bad influence whether it being them talking about violence, women, drugs etc. The whole defense of it was that “hey that’s their lifestyle, they should be allowed to express themselves and talk about THEIR experiences. “their “ being the key word. When it’s not theirs then it’s shady. But yes of course we should all have common sense. But not every kid has that unfortunately. That’s why smoking commercials are banned. We recognized decades ago that even though no one was telling kids to smoke. Kids generally want to copy what they think is cool. Make sense?