What was revealed to prophet Muhammad (pbuh)? Was it a dual revelation?
Vložit
- čas přidán 30. 07. 2022
- It is claimed by the majority of Muslims that prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was given two revelations from God - the Qur'an and the Sunnah. They say he was given what is referred to as Wahi Matlu (Recited Revelation) which is the Qur'an and Wahi Ghayri Matlu (Unrecited Revelation) which is the Hadith or the Sunnah. However, is this really what the Qur'an says? Can this doctrine be found and backed up by the Qur'an? I will do my best to answer this question with Quranic evidence.
Alhamduillah thank you for your work. Inshallah it continues and reach many Muslims struggling to grasp the religion from Allah vs the religion from hadith.
Thank you for the positive feedback Stoke da Moor. The only time you can trully appreciate the beauty and the clear definitions within the Qur'an is when we divorce ourselves from the nonsense within the Traditions.
Peace 🙂
Allah is a fake god invented by the false prophet Mohammed. The Hadiths are written by Arabs.
Also inshallah i would love to get a Quran translated in the way you have it
I love your explanation, I am a female (Fatima Pahad) and would like it if you address both genders. Could you also discuss SLAVE or WHAT YOUR RIGHT HAND POSSESSES
Salaam sister,
What your right hands possess (Ma Malakat Aymanakum) is also a fascinating topic which is heavily misunderstood. I will try to make a video on that as well God willing.
Peace 🙂
Excellent 👌.
Thank you my brother.
8:22 Sooorahs!!! Subhan'Allah!!! Only Surahs were sent down [2:23]
Thank you akhi. The Qur'an is abundantly clear about what was SENT DOWN (nazzala, anzala, unzila, etc) and INSPIRED (awhayna, awha, yooha, etc) to prophet Muhammad (a.s). And I proved in the Video that this revelation was always descibed in 'singular' form - NEVER as dual or plural!
SubhabAllah! Allah makes CLEAR (bayyinah) His verses.
Salam Alaikum bro i was wondering could you please do one explaining the Hajj and what it really means and also what qibla means in context to when the prophet Muhammad is being told to turn to a qibla that is pleasing to him etc, I would be most grateful if you did them as 2 separate presentations as you are very good by the way of explaining things and I hope you keep going until all that Talmudic, Zoroastrian and Arab paganism comes crashing down and in shaa Allah we can all come back to the Quran, Salam Alaikum bro ✌🏾👍🏾
Wa alaykum salaam brother Danny. I've actually made a video about the Qibla but not sure if I'll upload it yet. I haven't fully researched the topic of Hajj but will have to dig into that topic in the near future God willing.
God bless you 🙂
@@negeto2460 Salam Alaikum brother yeah I just saw your message now as I don’t usually check my notifications but thanks brother that would be fantastic if you could do a presentation for that in shaa Allah and may Allah (SWT) bless you and protect you in shaa Allah for all the good work you do, God bless you too my brother👍🏾
Most appreciated brother. Hikmah is an attribute of the Kitaab. What about where Allah says He will teach Eisa AS 4 books? Can I have your thoughts on the Torah and Injeel please brother?
Thank you for your comments akhi. You got the first part correct my brother by referring to the 'Hikmah' as an attribute of the Book. The problem is that many believe that the Arabic word 'waw' (translated as AND) is something 'seperate'. Whereas, i believe it is Allah's way to ADD additional information to further clarify the subject.
Here's an example:
"" There was certainly in their stories a lesson for those of understanding. Never was it [i.e., the Qur’ān] a narration invented, but a confirmation of what was before it AND a detailed explanation of all things AND guidance AND mercy for a people who believe.""{12:111}
Notice that the verse mentions 4 things which are seperated by the word 'waw' (AND). Here's the question:
Is this referring to 4 'seperate' or 'independent' subjects?? Or, are these simply referring to 4 ATTRIBUTES of the same subject - the Qur'an itself??
Similarly, the verse which reads:
""And He will teach him writing and wisdom and the Torah and the Gospel"" {3:48}
Now, we know what the Torah and the Injeel are. But what is the 'Book' and the 'Wisdom' mentioned here? Are these 2 'seperate' or 'independent' things?? Or, are they ATTRIBUTES of the Torah and the Injeel??
Doesn't the Qur'an refer to both the Torah and Injeel as 'Kitab'? And also 'Hikmah'? Think brother!
Therefore, the verse should be understood as:
Allah will teach Jesus the Torah and the Injeel which are 'SCRIPTURES' from Allah and full of 'WISDOM'.
i hope that makes sense akhi? Please watch my video called "what is the Qur'an" for more clarity inshaAllah.
Peace 😊
@@negeto2460 Most appreciated akhi. I'm with you on this. Mostly. I'm now questioning
- why Torah is never mentioned with Musa AS
- why Allah speaks of Eisa AS coming in THEIR FOOTSTEPS (very close time proximity)
- with BOTH Torah and Injeel,
- which Allah confirms what is currently BETWEEN (bayna yaday) his hands
- NOT confirming what came before in the past. Nope.
Just wondering.
@@CRISPSolutionsthis is why we must continuously engage with the Book of Allah my brother. I always say that the Qur'an is a life long journey and we can never stop learning and growing with this magnificient scripture. The answers will come as long as we remain patient and not be hasty. May Allah help us!
@@negeto2460 makes perfect sense akhi - I'm beginning to see this more now - the attributes of the Kitaab as opposed to different Kitaabs
A piece of advice. The first slide in your presentation, after the title, should include your thesis statement. Clearly write out what you are arguing for with your presentation. Quoting verses after verses without clearly stating your thesis statement makes it confusing to follow. Thanks.
Thank you for your feedback and God bless you. I'm always looking for ideas on how to improve on my presentations.
Interesting how it’s always in the singular
Exactly! There is no 'dual' revelation or 'dual' scripture mentioned. Therefore, traditional Muslims have no evidence for their false claims.
At 6:30 you dealt with the ending of 42:52.
Does this (لَتَهْدِي ) mean "you guide" or most likely "you are guided?"
Hence, the last part should read _"You are indeed guided to a straight path"_ because it is the Quran that teaches every single human being who wants to believe... the prophet included! _(12:3 We relate to you the best of the narrations in what We have revealed to you (of) this the Quran, although _*_you were, from before it, surely among the unaware_*_ .)_
Please refer to this verse:
17:9 Indeed, this, the Quran, guides to that which (is) most straight and gives glad tidings to the believers - those who do the righteous deeds, that for them (is) a reward great,
Besides, by saying that _"he guides you"_ means you are attributing a partner/associate to God, correct?
salam.
Salaam brother Shukri,
It's a good point you made but even if we translate it as "you guide", the verse must be understood according to the context. Because the verse just before this reads "nooran nahdee bihi" which translates as "WE GUIDE BY THE LIGHT". Therefore, the people are guided by THE LIGHT which was sent down upon Muhammad (as). We can also see in the following verses that Muhammad (as) cannot guide anyone on his own:
NOT UPON YOU, [O Muḥammad], IS [responsibility for] THEIR GUIDANCE, BUT ALLAH GUIDES WHOM HE WILLS. And whatever good you [believers] spend is for yourselves, and you do not spend except seeking the face [i.e., approval] of Allāh. And whatever you spend of good - it will be fully repaid to you, and you will not be wronged. {2 :272}
Also, in this verse:
Indeed, [O Muḥammad], YOU DO NOT GUIDE WHOM YOU LIKE, BUT ALLAH GUIDES WHOM HE WILLS. And He is most knowing of the [rightly] guided. {28:56}
We can clearly see that Muhammad (as) couldn't guide anyone except who Allah decided to guide! I actually cover this topic as well in another video which I will upload soon InshaAllah.
Peace 🙂
Firstly... well done!
I have always wanted to do what you are doing in this video but somehow got distracted. Anyway, my purpose is a bit different from yours and this is best highlighted by verse 47:2 which says:
_And those who believe and do righteous deeds, and believe in what is revealed to Muhammad, and it (is) the truth from their Lord, He will remove from them their misdeeds, and improve their condition._
To be more specific, I am looking at ( رَبِّهِمْ ) which has been translated as *_their_* Lord.
Now take time to think, ponder and reflect on this point:
If Muhammad is really the name of a person, then shouldn't it have been *_his_* instead of _their_ Lord?
However, if "Muhammad" is really the people who were together with the prophet named Ahmad, then the suffix "Miim" would hold true.
61:6 And when said Isa, son (of) Maryam, "O Children (of) Israel! Indeed, I am (the) Messenger (of) Allah to you, confirming that which (from) between hands of the Taurat and bringing glad tidings (of) a Messenger to come from after me, whose name (will be) Ahmad." But when he came to them with clear proofs, they said, "This (is) a magic clear."
Yes, I know all the interpreters and translators have tried to explain that it is not a name but an attribute... but think, ponder & reflect on this verse:
19:7 "O Zakariya! Indeed, We [We] give you glad tidings of a boy his name (will be) Yahya, not We (have) assigned [for] it from before (this) name."
So, is ( ٱسْمُهُۥ يَحْيَىٰ ) an attribute? But the last part of the verse says _"not We (have) assigned [for] it from before (this) name."_
Is ( ٱسْمُهُۥٓ أَحْمَدُ ) an attribute or a name?
And, when you think, ponder & reflect on this verse:
63:1 When come to you the hypocrites, they say, "We testify that you (are) surely (the) Messenger (of) Allah." And Allah knows that you (are) surely His Messenger, and Allah testifies that the hypocrites (are) surely liars.
Are those Sunnis, Shiites along with all the other "witness bearing" sectarians Muslims or as Allah Himself testifies that the hypocrites (are) surely liars?
salam.
Very good points my brother! It's so good to see Muslims who have woken up and refecting upon the Qur'an!
@Shukri.. YES I agree, and I'm so glad to see your comment..!!!
... after much thought and reflection over this past year.. I believe that there is no character called "Mohammed".. the person referred to delivering this Quran is AHMED who it also refers to.. so therefore WHAT is Mohammed?
This part in Surah Imran.. does appear to refer to a HIM though..? I don't know Arabic so is this correct.. I've looked at the only parts of the Quran, in 4 Surahs, where 'Mohammed' is mentioned..
"Muhammad is only a messenger: many Were the messenger that passed away before HIM. If HE died or were slain, will ye then Turn back on your heels?"
This if accurate.. does not fit with Mohammed as a THEY being a group..?
Can you explain to me the significance of the prefix of the letter" M" you mention, as this is the key here.. so does it indicate a 'status' of Ahmed.. because I have a theory about Ahmed, that I believe is correct that no one seems to be aware of and only YOU have come close to it, with you're theory here..
MashaAllah
Addition to 53:3
Allah didn't say whatever the Messenger “Says” but rather said: “Utter / Pronounce”. Here’s the difference between the two words.
[الكلام] - Kalaam: Means speech, the words that can be understood, however [ النطق ] - An Notq: means producing sounds or utter sounds.
For example, if we have a mute person who cannot speak, but they move their tongue to say words but cannot make themselves understood and that’s because they cannot speak not that they cannot produce sounds!
The Qur’an is the Speech of Allah, the Word of Allah but not his Pronunciation or Utterance. What Allah is telling the disbelievers of Makkah is: Stop throwing accusations at My Messenger for when he utters what I reveal to him, he is only uttering / pronouncing what has been revealed to him. He doesn’t make it out of his own nor is he selective in what he says, he is just a means to translate what I reveal to him so that you understand my Message.
Good points brother. May Allah bless you 🙂
Ya akhiy could you discuss salah
When quran says sent down, it can't be literal, because in a cosmic perspective ,there is no up and down.
It's up to you whether you take it literal or metaphorical. And if you still want to continue believing that we live on a spinning ball, then be my guest 😊
@@negeto2460 Do you have a hotel for globe believers ?😂
Which Quran did the Prophet authorise, the Hafs version or the Warsh. Both these books have variances within its text?
So which one was sent down to the Prophet, word for word, letter for letter.
Show us from the Quran only.
Here are some of the differences:
Quran 2:125
Hafs: watakhizu (you shall take)
Warsh: watakhazu (they have taken)
Quran 2:140
Hafs: taquluna (You say)
Warsh: yaquluna (They say)
Quran 2:184
Hafs: miskeenin (poor person
Warsh: masakeena (poor people)
Quran 3:146
Hafs: qatala (fought)
Warsh: qutila (was killed)
Quran 40:26
Hafs: aw an (or that)
Warsh: wa an (and that)
Quran 43:19
Hafs: ibaad (slaves)
Warsh: inda (with)
See we can deal with this Question because the answer its in the Hadith.
Where the Hadith speaks about the Quran being revealed in 7 different modes of recitation.
But where do you get the answer, show us from the Quran? Where in the Quran does it say, Allah sent the Quran in diffrent variances?
Salaam akhi,
Thank you for your comments.
First of all, I am not a Quranist. And to look at the Qur'an from a decontextualized way is not a plausable approach. Surely, the Qur'an has some 'history' behind it.
However, we are told that the Qur'an was sent down in 7 Ahrufs (according to hadeeth). But the question is:
What does 'Ahruf' mean exactly? Is it mode / recitation / accent / dialect / reading / pronounciation ??
When the Qu'ran was sent down (anzala) to the prophet, did he recite it in 7 different Ahrufs to his people?
The Copy of the Qur'an which was collected by Zaid ibn Thaabit (under the order of Abu Bakr), which Ahruf was it? Or did he collect all 7 Ahrufs?? Or was it one skeletal text in which these variant readings appeared over time?
And what exactly is the difference between 'Ahruf' and 'Qira'at'? Scholars have varying different opinions on it.
Which one was canonical?
7 qiraat by ibn mujaahid
10 qiraat by ibn jazari
20 by Al-Tabari
25 by abu ubayd
Others say over 50!
Which one of these were transmitted Mutawatir? Or Ahad??
Furthermore, Abdullah ibn Masud had his own Mushaf (written copy of Qur'an) but he excluded the last 2 Suras of the Qur'an (Falak and Nas) because he didn't believe they were part of the Qur'an!
Another thing to ponder over is that Uthman ibn Affan kept the Ahruf of the Qur'aysh and destroyed all the other 6. Well, weren't the other 6 Ahrufs also revealed from Allah?? Then why would he destroy them?
Do all these traditional reports give us clarity regarding the so-called variant teadings??
You even have the likes of Yasir Qadhi who opened up Pandoras Box by saying "there are holes in the narrative". Meaning, he doubts the authenticity or reliability of the transmission of the Qur'an. I'm utterly speechless!
I believe these textual variances appeared during the transcription and distrubution phase of the Qur'an by the early scribes. As you can imagine, people can make honest textual errors while copying or while writing out the Qur'an from memory. This is just human nature and it's perfectly understandable why we now see these differences. An example is "afala ta'qiloon" vs "afala ya'qiloon", or "naghfir" vs "yaghfir", and so on. The differences are mostly to do with the diacritical marks, dots, and vowels.
Think about it! Imagine a Qur'an teacher who taught his students to memorize the whole Qur'an and then got them to write it into book form without copying from anyone. Would you expect to see some (even minor) textual differences between the copies? I say absolutely! and this is just human nature because we are not perfect. Even with these variant readings, it's quite amazing to see that it does not affect or change the meanings from a theological perspective!
But this does NOT contradict verse 15:9 because Allah made the promise of preserving the DHIKR and Allah was very precise with His choice of words. The verse does not say He will protect the written copies of the Qur'an.
By the way, are you a Collinwood supporter?? The Coll vs Roos match was unreal! 😉
Peace
At 33:50 you quoted verse 8:43 and this verse starts with:
8:43 God made them to appear as few in your dream: had He made them appear as many,...
So, my understanding of this verse is simply that DREAMS ( مَنَامِكَ ) are NOT revelations because DREAMS are NOT TRUE... because _God made them to appear as few in your dream_ ... but in reality... *_had_*_ He made them appear as many..._
Hence, in the dream... just a few, but in reality... there are MANY!
You could surmise that _"dreams are the opposite of reality"_ but that would be false because of the dream of Ibrahim.
Anyway, in agreement with your video... there is only one revelation and that is the Quran.
salam.
Quran 48:27 "Allah indeed showed His Messenger the true vision, one fully in accord with reality. If Allah so wills you shall certainly enter the Inviolable Mosque, in full security, you will shave your heads and cut your hair short, and do so without any fear. He knew what you did not know, and He granted you a victory near at hand even before (the fulfilment of the vision)." Prophet Muhammad (saw) had Prophetic Dreams or vision which Allah showed mean they were revelation.
@@reachedcertaintyYou surmised, _"prophetic dreams"_ which is only valid according to your narrative which, truthfully, is way different from the context of 48:27.
salam.
@@shukriyusof2104 Salaam,
how is it different care to elaborate.
@@reachedcertainty czcams.com/users/liveJwhZLYhnafI?feature=share
@@shukriyusof2104 brother Shukri,
May Allah bless you and your family. Unfortunately, this chap repeatedly floods my CZcams videos with comments (ofcourse that's his right) and he just does not 'get' it or 'see' it! He made it abundantly clear that he's a hadithist and you cannot get through to him. Let him produce his proof that the prophet (a.s) received a seperate revelation from the Qur'an - the so called 'Sunnah' or 'Wahi ghayri matlu' or 'Wahi Batin'.
What can you do for a person who allows his traditions to block the LIGHT / GUIDANCE from reaching him?
Peace 🙂
Chapter 53-AN-NAJM AND 17:1- --- Sectarian translation and the wild imagination of the sufis created the mega disaster for the ummah-ISRA AND MAIRAJ--THE GREATEST HOAX IN THE HISTORY OF ISLAM,
17:1 is talking about the migration from Makkah to Madina at night time from Ghar-e-Thawr with the only sahaba mentioned without the name -enough hint ok one more 9:40
[also the last to verses of chapter 16 ]
CHAPTER 53 TALKS ABOUT REVELATION
53:9 Fakaana (qaaba qawsaini )aw adnaa
53:14 'Inda (sidratil muntaha)
the two words within the bracket.
[special request if the words within bracket can be explaine in detail]
Wahi Matlu (Recited Revelation) which is the Qur'an and Wahi Ghayri Matlu (Unrecited Revelation) which is the Hadith or the Sunnah.
the one man responsible for this GREATEST CRIME of --Wahi Ghayri Matlu (Unrecited Revelation) which is the Hadith or the Sunnah. is non other than Imam Shafi--he was a crypto shia , his resting place is in old Cairo very close to Al-Azhar, in the same vicinity -the second resting place of Hussein-the first one is in karbala-there is third one in istanbul also in old cairo is the second resting place of Bibi Zayanab[sister of Hussein] the first one in Damascus-also the resting place Bibi Sakina her first one died at the age roughly 5 in Damascus-also could be in Madina-she left the world at 80 plus according to several scholars-per one shia scholar she was married to the son of Hassn.
Well said brother! This 'Wahi Matlu' and 'Wahi Ghayri Matlu' has misled the masses and no one bothers to read the Qur'an themselves! Such a shame 😪
Crypto shia? More like crypto schlomo
@@goodman_1955 Yes !
abdul qadir jeelani was a talmudist rabbi.
" Going along the streets towards the Jewish quarter of the town, I passed a mosque of imposing appea ance, enclosed by a wall. In this mosque is the tomb of the great Marabut Abd-el-Kader, which is visited by numerous pilgrims. Tradition relates that the mosque was formerly a synagogue, and that the Marabut was no less a person than the celebrated Talmudist Joseh Haguelili. " page 117
Ref: EIGHT YEARS IN ASIA AND AFRICA
From 1846 to 1855 by Israel Joseph Benjamin