Why Yudhishthira is called Dharma Raj |
Vložit
- čas přidán 10. 09. 2024
- Ami Ganatra is an alumna of Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad (IIMA). A management professional, she is also a devout yoga practitioner, a certified yoga instructor, and a student of Sanskrit and Indian knowledge systems.
She was about to tell Yudhishthir's personality on Dharma, but she forgot
Yudhishthir hi the jo Dyut ka virodh kar rahe the usey adharm aur paap kehkar, ve ye bhi kahe ki unhe khelna nahi aata ye, lekin Shakuni jab Brahmano Rishiyo pe aarop lagaya tab Rishiyo Brahmano ke samman ki raksha keliye mann maarke unhe apne khelna pada aur saamne se sampatti daav lagai gai to Yudhishthir ji ko bhi sampatti daav lagani padi, praja ki sampatti aur adhikaar ko bina yudhh bina rakt bahaaye wapas jeetne keliye apne bhaiyo aur khudko daav lagaye praja raksha keliye, khudko haare baad ve uth gaye the lekin Shakuni ka sujhav tha ki Draupadi un pancho ki sadbhagya hai to unhe daav pe lagake praja ki sampatti zameen sab wapas jeet sakte hai aur tab tak Pandavo ka koi apman nahi hua tha to Yudhishthir ji ko laga Draupadi ka bhi apman nahi hoga isliye daav pe lagaye. Samrat Yudhishthir Rishi Brahman ko sab kuch se upar aur Praja ko apne pariwar aur khudse upar rakhe, ye kaarya ek DharmRaaj ka hi hai isliye aise praja-premi Samrat ke vanvaas jate samay praja inkeliye roi thi aur kai Brahman bhi inke sath vann me ruke mahino tak apna sab chordke. Pariwar ko praja se upar rakhne wale hazaro swarthi mil jate hai par Praja ko pariwar aur khudse upar rakhne wale Samrat Yudhishthir aur Pandavo jaise koi nahi milta isliye ve Dharmraaj hai Yudhishthir ji khud kahe ki Draupadi unhe aur unke bhaiyo ko apne praano se zyada pyari hai isliye shanti prastav me bhi 5 gaon ke sath sath Karn Duryodhan Dushasan aur Shakuni ko bandi banake Pandavo ke hawale karne ka bhi shart rakhe the, Draupadi ke apman par pratigya 4 Pandav liye aur Yudhishthir yuddh ka nirnay liye the.. Samrat Yudhishthir ko Mahabharat book se jaanne wale unke dyut wale kriya ko bhi galat nahi keh sakte, koi bhi karm paap/punya kehlata hai uske iraade ke adhaar pe aur Samrat Yudhishthir ka irada apna rajya/bhaiyo ka maan/draupadi ka samman gavana irada nahi tha Yudhishthir ji ka jaise ek Sainik ki patni apne pati ko sankat me bhejti hai praja keliye lekin us sainik ko marwana uska irada nahi hota hai, isliye aaj bhi Pandavo Draupadi ki puja hoti hai South aur Southasian desho me bade dhoom-dham se.
She forgets many things in between, not the first time
@@pallavi.vaidik...... """Yudhishthir hi the jo Dyut ka virodh kar rahe the usey adharm aur paap kehkar, ve ye bhi kahe ki unhe khelna nahi aata ye, lekin Shakuni jab Brahmano Rishiyo pe aarop lagaya tab Rishiyo Brahmano ke samman ki raksha keliye mann maarke unhe apne khelna pada""" ---->>> shakuni ne kya arop lagaya tha jiski wajeh se yudhishthir jo dyut khelna pada? aur aisa kaun sa arop tha jisase sirf unhi ko kasht hua baki kisi ko nahi aur uske liye dyut khelna hi one and only solution tha? can you elaborate on it pls
The way he said “theek hai” just before it ended 😂
😂😂
Misleading thumbnail 😌😌😔
Btaya nhi ki family ko jua me lgane ke baad v Yudhishtir dharmraj kaise ??
Aise ki family ko daav pe lagane wale Yudhishthir hi the jo Dyut ka virodh kar rahe the usey adharm aur paap kehkar, ve ye bhi kahe ki unhe khelna nahi aata ye, lekin Shakuni jab Brahmano Rishiyo pe aarop lagaya tab Rishiyo Brahmano ke samman ki raksha keliye mann maarke unhe apne khelna pada aur saamne se sampatti daav lagai gai to Yudhishthir ji ko bhi sampatti daav lagani padi, praja ki sampatti aur adhikaar ko bina yudhh bina rakt bahaaye wapas jeetne keliye apne bhaiyo aur khudko daav lagaye praja raksha keliye, khudko haare baad ve uth gaye the lekin Shakuni ka sujhav tha ki Draupadi un pancho ki sadbhagya hai to unhe daav pe lagake praja ki sampatti zameen sab wapas jeet sakte hai aur tab tak Pandavo ka koi apman nahi hua tha to Yudhishthir ji ko laga Draupadi ka bhi apman nahi hoga isliye daav pe lagaye. Samrat Yudhishthir Rishi Brahman ko sab kuch se upar aur Praja ko apne pariwar aur khudse upar rakhe, ye kaarya ek DharmRaaj ka hi hai isliye aise praja-premi Samrat ke vanvaas jate samay praja inkeliye roi thi aur kai Brahman bhi inke sath vann me ruke mahino tak apna sab chordke. Pariwar ko praja se upar rakhne wale hazaro swarthi mil jate hai par Praja ko pariwar aur khudse upar rakhne wale Samrat Yudhishthir aur Pandavo jaise koi nahi milta isliye ve Dharmraaj hai Yudhishthir ji khud kahe ki Draupadi unhe aur unke bhaiyo ko apne praano se zyada pyari hai isliye shanti prastav me bhi 5 gaon ke sath sath Karn Duryodhan Dushasan aur Shakuni ko bandi banake Pandavo ke hawale karne ka bhi shart rakhe the, Draupadi ke apman par pratigya 4 Pandav liye aur Yudhishthir yuddh ka nirnay liye the.. Samrat Yudhishthir ko Mahabharat book se jaanne wale unke dyut wale kriya ko bhi galat nahi keh sakte, koi bhi karm paap/punya kehlata hai uske iraade ke adhaar pe aur Samrat Yudhishthir ka irada apna rajya/bhaiyo ka maan/draupadi ka samman gavana irada nahi tha Yudhishthir ji ka jaise ek Sainik ki patni apne pati ko sankat me bhejti hai praja keliye lekin us sainik ko marwana uska irada nahi hota hai, isliye aaj bhi Pandavo Draupadi ki puja hoti hai South aur Southasian desho me bade dhoom-dham se.
Copy paste.@@pallavi.vaidik......
@@pallavi.vaidik......Aisa kooch nahi hua tha itna to😊😊😊 yuddhishthr was an addict. It was clearly mentioned in Mahabharat
@@pallavi.vaidik...... matlab sab pata ho kar bhi jaan bujh kar adharm kiya
@@rabinpun3691if it's copy paste, SO WHAT ?????
Vidoor ji ki jay...Hare Krishna..
I'm loving this series
Totally agree
King of Udupi did not fight.
He was given responsibility of preparing food for the armies
In grade 11th ICSE board, there was this novel "The Mayor of Castlebridge" by Thomas Hardy. The main character "Michael Henchard" after being drunk sells his wife to somebody ..
Answer toh diya hi nhi gambling wale scenerio ka
bhai yudhisthir dharmraj thay par thay insan hamare tumhar trait toh hai jo galti karta hai wo gambling wo hi hai hum bhi daru nahi peete hai kahin pi bhi lete hai wo galti har koi karta yudhisthir gambling ki galti hamari human ego aur matibrahshta hamari bhi hoti ye prasang hum yudishtir ko hamko aaj ke insano se jodta hai gyani dharmraj bhi galti karta hai par uska praschit wo 13 saal agyat vaas sahte hai daas ki jindagi jeete hai ye kya
@@agentravi00007 bro u r absolutely coreect but the point is she doesnot give a clear answer common public does not have such deep understanding
Yudhishthir hi the jo Dyut ka virodh kar rahe the usey adharm aur paap kehkar, ve ye bhi kahe ki unhe khelna nahi aata ye, lekin Shakuni jab Brahmano Rishiyo pe aarop lagaya tab Rishiyo Brahmano ke samman ki raksha keliye mann maarke unhe apne khelna pada aur saamne se sampatti daav lagai gai to Yudhishthir ji ko bhi sampatti daav lagani padi, praja ki sampatti aur adhikaar ko bina yudhh bina rakt bahaaye wapas jeetne keliye apne bhaiyo aur khudko daav lagaye praja raksha keliye, khudko haare baad ve uth gaye the lekin Shakuni ka sujhav tha ki Draupadi un pancho ki sadbhagya hai to unhe daav pe lagake praja ki sampatti zameen sab wapas jeet sakte hai aur tab tak Pandavo ka koi apman nahi hua tha to Yudhishthir ji ko laga Draupadi ka bhi apman nahi hoga isliye daav pe lagaye. Samrat Yudhishthir Rishi Brahman ko sab kuch se upar aur Praja ko apne pariwar aur khudse upar rakhe, ye kaarya ek DharmRaaj ka hi hai isliye aise praja-premi Samrat ke vanvaas jate samay praja inkeliye roi thi aur kai Brahman bhi inke sath vann me ruke mahino tak apna sab chordke. Pariwar ko praja se upar rakhne wale hazaro swarthi mil jate hai par Praja ko pariwar aur khudse upar rakhne wale Samrat Yudhishthir aur Pandavo jaise koi nahi milta isliye ve Dharmraaj hai Yudhishthir ji khud kahe ki Draupadi unhe aur unke bhaiyo ko apne praano se zyada pyari hai isliye shanti prastav me bhi 5 gaon ke sath sath Karn Duryodhan Dushasan aur Shakuni ko bandi banake Pandavo ke hawale karne ka bhi shart rakhe the, Draupadi ke apman par pratigya 4 Pandav liye aur Yudhishthir yuddh ka nirnay liye the.. Samrat Yudhishthir ko Mahabharat book se jaanne wale unke dyut wale kriya ko bhi galat nahi keh sakte, koi bhi karm paap/punya kehlata hai uske iraade ke adhaar pe aur Samrat Yudhishthir ka irada apna rajya/bhaiyo ka maan/draupadi ka samman gavana irada nahi tha Yudhishthir ji ka jaise ek Sainik ki patni apne pati ko sankat me bhejti hai praja keliye lekin us sainik ko marwana uska irada nahi hota hai, isliye aaj bhi Pandavo Draupadi ki puja hoti hai South aur Southasian desho me bade dhoom-dham se.
@@agentravi00007Yudhishthir hi the jo Dyut ka virodh kar rahe the usey adharm aur paap kehkar, ve ye bhi kahe ki unhe khelna nahi aata ye, lekin Shakuni jab Brahmano Rishiyo pe aarop lagaya tab Rishiyo Brahmano ke samman ki raksha keliye mann maarke unhe apne khelna pada aur saamne se sampatti daav lagai gai to Yudhishthir ji ko bhi sampatti daav lagani padi, praja ki sampatti aur adhikaar ko bina yudhh bina rakt bahaaye wapas jeetne keliye apne bhaiyo aur khudko daav lagaye praja raksha keliye, khudko haare baad ve uth gaye the lekin Shakuni ka sujhav tha ki Draupadi un pancho ki sadbhagya hai to unhe daav pe lagake praja ki sampatti zameen sab wapas jeet sakte hai aur tab tak Pandavo ka koi apman nahi hua tha to Yudhishthir ji ko laga Draupadi ka bhi apman nahi hoga isliye daav pe lagaye. Samrat Yudhishthir Rishi Brahman ko sab kuch se upar aur Praja ko apne pariwar aur khudse upar rakhe, ye kaarya ek DharmRaaj ka hi hai isliye aise praja-premi Samrat ke vanvaas jate samay praja inkeliye roi thi aur kai Brahman bhi inke sath vann me ruke mahino tak apna sab chordke. Pariwar ko praja se upar rakhne wale hazaro swarthi mil jate hai par Praja ko pariwar aur khudse upar rakhne wale Samrat Yudhishthir aur Pandavo jaise koi nahi milta isliye ve Dharmraaj hai Yudhishthir ji khud kahe ki Draupadi unhe aur unke bhaiyo ko apne praano se zyada pyari hai isliye shanti prastav me bhi 5 gaon ke sath sath Karn Duryodhan Dushasan aur Shakuni ko bandi banake Pandavo ke hawale karne ka bhi shart rakhe the, Draupadi ke apman par pratigya 4 Pandav liye aur Yudhishthir yuddh ka nirnay liye the.. Samrat Yudhishthir ko Mahabharat book se jaanne wale unke dyut wale kriya ko bhi galat nahi keh sakte, koi bhi karm paap/punya kehlata hai uske iraade ke adhaar pe aur Samrat Yudhishthir ka irada apna rajya/bhaiyo ka maan/draupadi ka samman gavana irada nahi tha Yudhishthir ji ka jaise ek Sainik ki patni apne pati ko sankat me bhejti hai praja keliye lekin us sainik ko marwana uska irada nahi hota hai, isliye aaj bhi Pandavo Draupadi ki puja hoti hai South aur Southasian desho me bade dhoom-dham se.
Where you have collected this knowledge from books i AM very grateful to you Ami
Original Mahabharata se
She read Mahabharata from original sources in Sanskrit
श्री कृष्ण ने भी पापियों का वध कर धर्मराज युधिष्ठिर को सिंहासन पर बैठाने की बात की था..अगर वो धर्म के डगर से हट जाते तो क्या सच्चिदानंद स्वरुप श्री कृष्ण ऐसा कहते..अर्जुन ने उनके क्रोध को शांत किया था🙏🏻
"वैशम्पायन ने कहा, 'यह सुनकर कि पाण्डव दुःख से पीड़ित हैं, भोज, वृष्णि और अन्धक सभी एकत्र होकर महान् वन में उनके पास गये। पांचाल के उत्तराधिकारी, चेदि के राजा धृष्टकेतु और विश्वविख्यात अत्यंत पराक्रमी केकय बंधु क्रोध और असहिष्णुता से भरे हुए वन में पार्थों से मिलने गये। उन्होंने धृतराष्ट्र के पुत्रों की निन्दा की और पूछा, "हम क्या करेंगे?" क्षत्रियों में उन सभी क्षत्रियों ने वसुदेव को सबसे आगे रखा। उन्होंने धर्मराज युधिष्ठिर को घेर लिया और उनके चारों ओर बैठ गये।वासुदेव ने कहा, "पृथ्वी दुर्योधन, कर्ण, दुष्टात्मा शकुनि और चौथे के रूप में दुःशासन का रक्त पी जायेगी। उसके बाद, हम सभी धर्मराज युधिष्ठिर को राज्याभिषेक करेंगे। वे छली लोग मारे जाने के योग्य हैं। यह सनातन धर्म है।" पार्थवों के प्रति अपने प्रेम के कारण जनार्दन क्रोधित हो गए।
चूंकि उन्हें ऐसा लग रहा था कि वे सभी प्राणियों को जला देंगे, इसलिए अर्जुन ने उन्हें शांत किया। केशव के क्रोध को देखकर फाल्गुन ने उन महान आत्मा द्वारा अपने पिछले शरीरों में किए गए कर्मों का वर्णन किया।"
कैराट पर्व- अध्याय ३१०(१३)
what exactly she explains that Yudhishthira was a Dharam raj?
About patience, discipline and foresight.
Let me give you a powerful fact about Yudhisthira: During the rajasuya yagna, Maharshi Vedavyasa arrived and fortold that in 13 years a terrible disaster would bring about the end of the yuga because of this rajasuya. This upset Yudhisthira so much that after the yagna he summoned his four brothers and said he wished to end his own life to prevent this disaster.
When Phalguna urged Yudhisthira to not act rashly, Yudhisthira thought and finally declared that he won't get angry with anyone for 13 years, because he believed that if the Chakravarti won't get angry with anyone, how can there be any wars?
This is the reason that during dyuta sabha, when Vrikodara was raging at kauravas for insulting them, Yudhisthira simply sat with his head bowed. His love for people from both allied and enemy nations was unparalleled.
Yar tum br chopra ki mahabharat ko itna bhi bura mat batao
Br Chopra Mahabharat is kachra. Read the actual Mahabharat.
Bura nahi bata rahe changes Jo kre hai vo bta rhe
@@anaghashenoy2581 actual kya hai kisi ko nahin pata. Har koi apni padi hui kitab ko original kehta hai. Moorakhta ki nishani
@@sanyogpatial1819 aap kisi ko "murktha ki nishani batane" se pehle..BORI edition of Mahabharat padh lijiye..
Bhai aaplog Pura podcaste dekho tab sabkuch clear ho jayega ❤❤
"Phle divyaastra ikkatha kro"
Yudishthir ne kaha tha
Ya krishn ne...??
Krishn ji 😊
ये स्वयं एक महिला होकर भी युधिष्ठिर द्वारा महिला को जुएँ में लगाना जायज सिद्ध कर सकती है । दासी प्रथा न्यायोचित ठहरा सकती है ।
I don't know how the Pandavas or Kauravas claimed inheritance.
In reality both were not the blood line of the original kuru race.
Shantanu's son was Bheeshma. He was the original heir.
Both sons of Shantanu(Chitrangad and Vichtraveer) were heirless.
Ved vyas was the biological father of Dhitirashtra , Pandu and Vidur.
The matter was more complicated with Pandavad. Since Pandu could not conceive Kunti and Madri were impregnated with others to bear children.
So technically both did not carry the blood line
Yudhishthir hi the jo Dyut ka virodh kar rahe the usey adharm aur paap kehkar, ve ye bhi kahe ki unhe khelna nahi aata ye, lekin Shakuni jab Brahmano Rishiyo pe aarop lagaya tab Rishiyo Brahmano ke samman ki raksha keliye mann maarke unhe apne khelna pada aur saamne se sampatti daav lagai gai to Yudhishthir ji ko bhi sampatti daav lagani padi, praja ki sampatti aur adhikaar ko bina yudhh bina rakt bahaaye wapas jeetne keliye apne bhaiyo aur khudko daav lagaye praja raksha keliye, khudko haare baad ve uth gaye the lekin Shakuni ka sujhav tha ki Draupadi un pancho ki sadbhagya hai to unhe daav pe lagake praja ki sampatti zameen sab wapas jeet sakte hai aur tab tak Pandavo ka koi apman nahi hua tha to Yudhishthir ji ko laga Draupadi ka bhi apman nahi hoga isliye daav pe lagaye. Samrat Yudhishthir Rishi Brahman ko sab kuch se upar aur Praja ko apne pariwar aur khudse upar rakhe, ye kaarya ek DharmRaaj ka hi hai isliye aise praja-premi Samrat ke vanvaas jate samay praja inkeliye roi thi aur kai Brahman bhi inke sath vann me ruke mahino tak apna sab chordke. Pariwar ko praja se upar rakhne wale hazaro swarthi mil jate hai par Praja ko pariwar aur khudse upar rakhne wale Samrat Yudhishthir aur Pandavo jaise koi nahi milta isliye ve Dharmraaj hai Yudhishthir ji khud kahe ki Draupadi unhe aur unke bhaiyo ko apne praano se zyada pyari hai isliye shanti prastav me bhi 5 gaon ke sath sath Karn Duryodhan Dushasan aur Shakuni ko bandi banake Pandavo ke hawale karne ka bhi shart rakhe the, Draupadi ke apman par pratigya 4 Pandav liye aur Yudhishthir yuddh ka nirnay liye the.. Samrat Yudhishthir ko Mahabharat book se jaanne wale unke dyut wale kriya ko bhi galat nahi keh sakte, koi bhi karm paap/punya kehlata hai uske iraade ke adhaar pe aur Samrat Yudhishthir ka irada apna rajya/bhaiyo ka maan/draupadi ka samman gavana irada nahi tha Yudhishthir ji ka jaise ek Sainik ki patni apne pati ko sankat me bhejti hai praja keliye lekin us sainik ko marwana uska irada nahi hota hai, isliye aaj bhi Pandavo Draupadi ki puja hoti hai South aur Southasian desho me bade dhoom-dham se.
They claimed inheritance through their mother's bloodline. Shastras are not patriarchical, your mentality is.
They carried the celestial blood line.
@@whitelotus2960 I can make out your mentality.
Here we are talking about Hastinapur and the blood line of the kings of Hastinapur.
Sick mentality does not see rational. Killing of millions is seen as some kind of dharma ,but effective ruling that prevented any war for decades (by Satyavati) is not
@@satishkamtikar958 tereko keedha hai dimaag mein, many princesses were married to sages when there were no sons and therefore the pure bloodlines continued through the daughter of the king. This tradition is called putrika dharma. Pure bloodlines don't come from only males, this is why kunti was adopted and not a male child was adopted. You better start reading the Vedas. So it's not really the bloodline sage vyasa, it was the bloodlines of kashi princesses of the same clan. So yes Keedha hai patriarchy tereko.....
Gambling your kingdom, people, siblings, yourself, and your own wife, is not the act of Dharma but, Adharama
Best Idea patience
👍👍👍
After 5000 years they will say original Mahabharat was written by Ami Ganatra
She's just rolling words around trying to avoid the specific question asked 😑
I don't like her interpretation of Karna's character as well. Honestly this person is overrated.
You are right. Like Just get to the damn point.
Once she said karna got Vasavi Shakti for kavach kundala so it's a good deal. But she didn't mentioned the fact that karna was even ready to give up his life to Indra but he asked for Vasavi Shakti only because his father ordered him to.
She also talked about how karna was arrogant but what about those who were arrogant to him? Bhima even called him a dog.
Tujhe aisa kyu lagta hai ki 10 minutes ke ander ye podcast pura khatam ho gaya??? Kyunki te ra dimaag khatam ho chuka hai.....😆😆😆😂😂😂
@@samsherchatankar2312 How about karna himself, he was the greatest RACIST OF MAHABHARAT. Karna used to call Pandavas illegitimates because Pandu didn't bear any children, so how did Kunti Mata lay birth to Pandavas??? Also karna used to mock and demean those Brahmins that are warriors by profession like Dronacharya and Kripacharya etc. Karna was arrogant, racist and mysoginist personality, just like Duryodhana, no wonder how they became best friends..
@@samsherchatankar2312How about karna himself, he was the greatest RACIST OF MAHABHARAT. Karna used to call Pandavas illegitimates because Pandu didn't bear any children, so how did Kunti Mata lay birth to Pandavas??? Also karna used to mock and demean those Brahmins that are warriors by profession like Dronacharya and Kripacharya etc. Karna was arrogant, racist and mysoginist personality, just like Duryodhana, no wonder how they became best friends..
How do you expect this podcast to be completed in just 10 minutes ??? Maybe u should listen to her whole podcast to know the answers... I don't understand why people nowadays don't use their brain cells ??? Maybe u don't have it.
Isilye jail gyi thi ye😂😂
Mohadev to khud hi bola tha arjun ku koi nahi hara sakta tha is youdh main oo sony putra karna choot bolkar mohadev ku fake kardia oo andhbhakt bhi samil hey adharmi
Oo andhbhakt mohadev ku nahi dakne chahiye kyu ki kharab alagegi hamara mohadev ku or mohadev ki bhakt ki HAR HAR MOHADEV KI JAY HO BOLO Sab
Draupadi was the greatest women in our history ❤
Nope! I consider Maa Sita as greatest woman in whole world. No woman one can match her .I consider her as my mother.
@@shivamsingh9127aur bhi hai btw she was a Goddess
@@shivamsingh9127Draupadi was the Avatar of Sita Mata..
@@anujasmartphone1627 Draupadi was NO ordinary woman, she was a partial incarnation of Lakshmi and a complete incarnation of Sachi and Nalayani. Draupadi is mentioned to be celestial Sri and celestial Sri means Queen Saachi.
So she married the Pandavas who are considered partial incarnations of Vishnu and complete incarnations of the panch Indras.
According to Mahabharat Draupadi is formed by the energy of Shiva. After her death, she merged into Goddess Lakshmi.
Edit: To some people who say celestial Sri is not Lakshmi.
According to Devi Bhagavat celestial Sri (or Sachi) is a form of Lakshmi who resides in heaven.
She is the celestial Lakshmi residing in the heavens, and royal Lakshmi in palaces, Griha Lakshmi in the houses of several householders.
Devi Bhagavath chapter 1 book 1
The Goddess Shree of Mahabharat refers only to Lakshmi.
According to Devi Bhagavat, Draupadi in her previous birth is Chaya, Sita or Vedavati who later appeared as Nalayani and reincarnated as Padmavati.
Draupadi was extremely beautiful, intelligent and virtuous woman, with her body smelling like a fresh bloom lotus. There are few women in Hindu mythology who were aggressive and who spoke their mind in a world of men. Draupadi was one of them. She is considered by many as the first feminist of Indian mythology. At the time of her birth, a celestial voice had proclaimed: "This unparalleled beauty has taken birth to uproot the Kauravas and establish the rule of religion".
No one will think of a woman born out of fire as ordinary. Also, there are many aspects like different purana mention different origin of incarnation of Draupadi, including chaya Sita and even the debate of her existence in first place, and even the story of Pandavas and Indransh. But these discussion can go long and i want to opt out due to time limit. I will however want to know the reference for Pandavas being Vishnu incarnation. I couldn't find that any parvas of MB, i must have missed it.
13 years doubt is because in which method they counted 13 years. Were they counting in suryaman or chandraman .
in chandraman for every three years you have an extra month ,so 13 years will complete in 12 years and 9 months .and add 3 extra or adhik month . Which will become 13 years but this changes in suryaman. So duryodhana picks up this logic and fights but dharmraj stays in hiding for more months also to compensate it.
bkchdi band kr aur seedhe seedhe bata patni ko jue mein lagana sahi he ya galat
Ek kam kar tu apni patni ko dao par laga, aur phir mein batata hu sahi hai ya galat...
Tujhe aisa kyu lagta hai ki 10 minutes ke ander ye podcast pura khatam ho gaya??? Kyunki te ra dimaag khatam ho chuka hai.....😆😆😆😂😂😂
Aaaaaaaaaa thuuuuuuuuuuu.....tere upar 😆😆😆😆
@@Alien-user are budbak tune toh puri padcast dekhi hogi chal tu hi bata de apni biwi ko juwe mein lagana kaise sahi he ??
धर्म के विषय में पांडव क्या थे, वो तो हस्तिनापुर की प्रजा भी जानती थी। इसलिए द्युत में छल से हराए जाने के पश्चात भी वो पांडवों का अनुसरण करने लगे 🙏🏻
"जनमेजय ने पूछा, "हे ब्राह्मणश्रेष्ठ! जब दुष्ट हृदय वाले धृतराष्ट्र के पुत्रों तथा उनके सलाहकारों ने छल से द्यूतक्रीड़ा में पार्थों को पराजित कर दिया, और वे क्रोधित हो गए, तथा शत्रुता उत्पन्न करने वालों के कटु वचन भी सुने, तब मेरे पूर्वज, पुरुषों में श्रेष्ठ कौरव्य ने क्या किया? शक्र के समान पराक्रमी, किन्तु अचानक धन-संपत्ति से वंचित होकर महान् दुःख में पड़ जाने पर पार्थ ने वन में अपना समय किस प्रकार व्यतीत किया? जो लोग उस महान् दुर्भाग्य को प्राप्त हुए थे, उनके पीछे कौन गया? वे क्या खाते थे? उनका आचरण कैसा था? वे महात्मा कहाँ रहते थे? हे ब्राह्मणश्रेष्ठ! शत्रुओं का नाश करने वाले उन महात्माओं के लिए वन में बारह वर्ष कैसे व्यतीत हुए? स्त्रियों में श्रेष्ठ, परम सौभाग्यशाली, पति परायण, सत्य बोलने वाली राजकुमारी ने वन में रहने का भयंकर दुःख कैसे सहन किया, यद्यपि वह पतिव्रता नहीं थी? हे तपस्वी! मैं उन महातेजस्वी और तेजस्वी पुरुषों के चरित्र सुनना चाहता हूँ। हे ब्राह्मण! मुझे बताओ, क्योंकि मेरी जिज्ञासा बहुत बड़ी है।'
वैशम्पायन ने कहा, 'धृतराष्ट्र के दुष्ट पुत्रों तथा उनके मंत्रियों द्वारा जुए में पराजित होने के कारण पाण्डवों ने क्रोधित होकर गजशहर्य छोड़ दिया। वे वर्धमान नामक नगर के द्वार से निकल आये। कृष्णा तथा समस्त अस्त्र-शस्त्रों के साथ वे उत्तर दिशा की ओर चल पड़े। इन्द्रसेन तथा अन्य चौदह सेवक अपनी स्त्रियों के साथ तीव्र गति से चलने वाले रथों पर सवार होकर उनके पीछे चल पड़े। उनके चले जाने का समाचार पाकर नगरवासियों में बड़ा शोक छा गया। वे सब एकत्र होकर एक दूसरे से निर्भय होकर बार-बार भीष्म, विदुर, द्रोण तथा गौतम की निन्दा करने लगे। "इस वंश में सब कुछ असुरक्षित है। हम सुरक्षित नहीं हैं। हमारे घर सुरक्षित नहीं हैं, जब दुष्ट दुर्योधन, सौबल, कर्ण और दुःशासन की सहायता से राज्य के लोभी हैं। जब वंश नहीं है, आचरण नहीं है और धर्म नहीं है, तो सुख कैसे हो सकता है? दुर्योधन अपने वरिष्ठों से घृणा करता है। उसने सदाचार और अपने शुभचिंतकों को त्याग दिया है। वह धन का लोभी और अहंकारी है। वह नीच है और उसका चरित्र निंदनीय है। जहाँ दुर्योधन राजा है, वहाँ पृथ्वी स्वस्थ नहीं रह सकती। हम सब वहाँ चलें जहाँ पुण्यशाली पांडव जा रहे हैं। वे महान आत्मा हैं और क्रोधी नहीं हैं। वे अपनी इंद्रियों और शत्रुओं पर नियंत्रण रखते हैं। वे विनम्र और कर्म करने वाले हैं।उनका आचरण धर्म के अनुरूप है।" ये वचन कहकर वे सब लोग पाण्डवों के पीछे चले।"
आरण्यक पर्व- अध्याय २९८(१)
she always praise those character t who lost theirs wife in bet but hate great karan
Trinam api na dasye.....i will not even give a grass .....duryodhan said this to sri Krishna
Ami gi महाभारत मे 1500000000 एक अरब 50 करोड़ लोग मारे गये थे युधिष्ठिर जी के अनूसार .
Bhim ke baremay Kuch bataogay.bachapan say kaurab say kesaa bartab karta hay our kesa toucher kartahaye😊
Are kehna kya chahte ho🤔🤔🤔
Isko kuch knowledge nahi hi
One thing is clear in this session.
Sister only hate Karna very much 😂
Koi kitna bhi bda adhram kyu na kre but iski njr me sirf karna adhrmi he
Who is agree guys
vote for our role model and one of the best warrior karna ❤
These chapris judging Dharmaraj yudhishtira... kaha aa gaye hum 😂
Her views are always biased. She is anti Karna and pro pandavas . She can never se their flaws😂
mat dekha karo bhai itni serials, pick up some original texts
Koroona mariz spotted....😆😆😆😆
Read original books plzzz
सौरी मैडम युधिष्ठिर महाराज ने धृतराष्ट्र को मरने वालों की संख्या 166करोड़ 20000 बताया है।
Kaha bataya hai bhai , humne to padha nahi
@@Navneet_Jhaved vyas ji ki Mahabharat me
@@srstatushub8098 nahi batayi bhai maine padha hai
@@Navneet_Jhakaunsi edition?
@@Ashutoshh608 critical edition
Confuse karna band karo
Kya hua
@@NaveenSharma-gq9qj om wa om
To padh lo bhai
Padho to pats chale confuse na hona ho to
Tu beta gar jaake bornvita pi rohit mehra ke sath
Ye to wrong number Hi 😅
Chal jhoothe
thumbnail kuch lga do gyan aur pel do kuch bhi
kha hai answer " why " ka
She only speaks what she has prepared or what she has a narrative for.....changes and hops topics in each and every line....distorts timelines.
Gives out personal assumptions and view which such confidence ending with maybes, trying to persuade the viewers.
Aapki dukaan isse chalti hai uska matlab ye nahi ki log ye sab dekh, samaj nahi sakte.
Jo jeet ta hai wahi itihaas likhta hai. Pandavo ka bhi yahi haal hai.
Yudhishthir hi the jo Dyut ka virodh kar rahe the usey adharm aur paap kehkar, ve ye bhi kahe ki unhe khelna nahi aata ye, lekin Shakuni jab Brahmano Rishiyo pe aarop lagaya tab Rishiyo Brahmano ke samman ki raksha keliye mann maarke unhe apne khelna pada aur saamne se sampatti daav lagai gai to Yudhishthir ji ko bhi sampatti daav lagani padi, praja ki sampatti aur adhikaar ko bina yudhh bina rakt bahaaye wapas jeetne keliye apne bhaiyo aur khudko daav lagaye praja raksha keliye, khudko haare baad ve uth gaye the lekin Shakuni ka sujhav tha ki Draupadi un pancho ki sadbhagya hai to unhe daav pe lagake praja ki sampatti zameen sab wapas jeet sakte hai aur tab tak Pandavo ka koi apman nahi hua tha to Yudhishthir ji ko laga Draupadi ka bhi apman nahi hoga isliye daav pe lagaye. Samrat Yudhishthir Rishi Brahman ko sab kuch se upar aur Praja ko apne pariwar aur khudse upar rakhe, ye kaarya ek DharmRaaj ka hi hai isliye aise praja-premi Samrat ke vanvaas jate samay praja inkeliye roi thi aur kai Brahman bhi inke sath vann me ruke mahino tak apna sab chordke. Pariwar ko praja se upar rakhne wale hazaro swarthi mil jate hai par Praja ko pariwar aur khudse upar rakhne wale Samrat Yudhishthir aur Pandavo jaise koi nahi milta isliye ve Dharmraaj hai Yudhishthir ji khud kahe ki Draupadi unhe aur unke bhaiyo ko apne praano se zyada pyari hai isliye shanti prastav me bhi 5 gaon ke sath sath Karn Duryodhan Dushasan aur Shakuni ko bandi banake Pandavo ke hawale karne ka bhi shart rakhe the, Draupadi ke apman par pratigya 4 Pandav liye aur Yudhishthir yuddh ka nirnay liye the.. Samrat Yudhishthir ko Mahabharat book se jaanne wale unke dyut wale kriya ko bhi galat nahi keh sakte, koi bhi karm paap/punya kehlata hai uske iraade ke adhaar pe aur Samrat Yudhishthir ka irada apna rajya/bhaiyo ka maan/draupadi ka samman gavana irada nahi tha Yudhishthir ji ka jaise ek Sainik ki patni apne pati ko sankat me bhejti hai praja keliye lekin us sainik ko marwana uska irada nahi hota hai, isliye aaj bhi Pandavo Draupadi ki puja hoti hai South aur Southasian desho me bade dhoom-dham se.
Aisa kuch nahi, ye itihas likhne wale MahaRishi Vedvyas the.. Pandavo ka hire kiya gaya koi lekhak nahi jaise west ke log karte hai.. MahaRishi Vedvyas ek Rishi bhi the aur dono Pandav Kaurav ke ek jaise biological Dada-ji bhi, dada keliye sabhi pote ek jaise hote hai isliye unhone vohi likha jo satya hai aur Pandav sahi maayne me Dharmatma aur Purushottam the jabki Kaurav bachpan se hi zehar dene jaise dusahas crime karne wale swabhav ke the to jo jaisa hai vaisa likhe jo satya hai, Nal Damyanti ki bhi story likhe ve jisme Nal jeette nahi balki haarte hai tab bhi Nal ko hi hero dikhaya jata hai vaise hi agar Mahabharat me Pandav haar bhi jate agar tab bhi is granth me Pandav ki asli achai aur Kauravo ki asli burai hi dikhai jati jaise Nal ke maamle me hua
Corona fan, tera sanitizer hai Mahabharat book padh liya kar kabhi.. Debroy aur Sonyputra na dekhkar 😂
Agar jeetne wala itihaas likhtaa hai, to ye bata phir ki Pandavas ne apni kamiya kyu likhwayi...????
If Mahabharata was written by the winners, What winners would accept that they killed their opponents unfairly..???😆😆😆 Lol good joke. Mahabharata is an unbiased text, but books like Rashmirathi and Mrityunjay are based on Karna-Folklores which are totally biased.
Himmat hai to jawab de....
😂
Mai gali nahi deta, vrna sach me suna deta is lady ko...
1. Khub confusing baate chal rhi hai.. muh bna bna kr
2. Patni aur bhaiyon ko daanv pr lgana konsa dharm hai?
Thumbnail question ko chhod kr alg hi duniya chal rhi hai
Bhaiyoo ko to bet yudhistir ney lagaya thaa parantu
Yudhishtar bet him in the gambling. He lost in it. Thus, he became a slave of Duryodhan/Kauravs or their team. A slave must do whatever that was ordered by his owner.
Shakuni advised, of course ordered to put Draupadi at stake in gambling. Being a slave, he should do what they say. Otherwise, they’ll say that Yudhishtar doesn’t follow dharm and many more. So, in that situation, without any other option, he kept Draupadi at stake. But, he didn’t wish to. We think that he kept Draupadi at stake.
Himmat hai to gali de kar dikhaa....Agar apni patni ko dao par lagana adharm hai to dusaro ki patni ko jabardasti ghaseet kar sabha mein laanaa aur usee sabke saamne nirvastra karna, ye to badaa punya ka kaam hai, Shri Dusshahasan ki jai ho....😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😂
Koroona mariz spotted....😆😆😆😆
@@Alien-user to kon bol rha hai bhai ki dussashan ne bada puny ka kaam kiya??
Maine bola kya??
Bakar mt kr
@@prynsh_ 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Misleading.... Certain points....
Adharm raj bolo
Satyendra Pandey nahi jhootyendra Pandey bolo...😆😆😆
Yudhishthir was an addicted gambler.. Very Very Very SELFISH unfit to be called Dharmraj.
JAI SRI KRISHNA JAI SRI KRISHNA.
Really!!! Are you greater than Vyasa and Shri Krishn also?? Greater than the common people of Hastinapur also who wanted him as their king??
He was never selfish. I've read Mahabharat granth and Yudhishthir first opposed the gambling thing saying that a Kshatriya wins his property through war and not through Shatth and that playing Dyut is adharma but Shakuni gave him many such examples that made him believe that there is nothing wrong in it.
Why did he put his wife & Brothers in stake? Understand it before judging - Dhritarashtra had done favor on Yudhishthir and all Pandavs had since their childhood, never made them fatherless, even when Pandavs stayed as ghar jamai for 1 year in Panchal Dhritarashtra called them back gifting them many things including half kingdom and many more things so they trusted and obeyed Dhritarashtra more than Maharaj Pandu too, it was Dhritarashtra's order to Pandavas that made them play this Dyut/gambling without even knowing how to play it just to obey their father-like. They kept their Putra Dharm above their achievements thus Yudhishthir kept in stake the treasure (that's what Duryodhan too kept in stake first), then as per the rule unless the host (Dhritarashtra) stops the game the game would continue, Yudhishthir wanted to get back what he lost because it was not his personal property it was his people's wealth & land which he had to earn back so to rescue his people from falling into Duryodhan's hands he kept his Raaj-Dharm above Nij-Dharm/Personal life keeping his brothers & himself in stake to rescue the people without waging a war. Pandavs were not insulted or laughed even after loosing, no Pandav brother was insulted maybe that's why on Shakuni's suggestion he agreed to keep Draupadi in stake believing she too won't be insulted like his brothers & he weren't so maybe that's why again here his focus was winning back people's wealth & freedom without any bloodshed. But when Draupadi was dragged in and insulted he by choice played a last round of 13yrs exile (there was 1 dyut, not 2.. the first last half and second's first half is an interpolation because Draupadi was on her periods when dragged in first dyut and she remained in same periods cloth with stains on it while leaving for Exile that proves the continuity) and Bheem saved Draupadi from being disrobed, all 4 brothers pledged to take her revenge, they themselves were insulted when Draupadi refused to arrive they were abused a lot but they responded and pledged to kill all only when Draupadi was insulted. Yudhishthir keeping his Pati Dharm above all played a last round keeping in stake a challenge of spending 13yrs in exile, he accepted this just to get proper time for the preperations which he'd not get if they returned to Indraprasth (which Dhritarashtra had returned back to him to calm down the audience Kings after freeing the Pandavs as boons given to Draupadi), therefore he considered playing the last round and it was his plan to prepare for war in these years. So according to me Yudhishthir & Pandavs were not wrong, their Putra Dharm/Trust on Dhritarashtra and Raaj Dharm were used, even Krishna & Draupadi calls them Victims, not Culprits. They did wrong but that was a mistake, not a sin because what happened was never their intention and not the result of any addiction. What happened to Draupadi was a result of Pandavs' trust on Dhritarashtra that he is their well-wisher which he always pretended to be till that day. Blind faith is the reason behind this adharm, not addiction as Yudhishthir never knew to play dyut and considered it Adharm plus No gambler puts himself in stake.
Idiots giving their opinion 😂
@@pallavi.vaidik......that means that yudhishthir was not that addicted to gambling as shown in TV serials.
@@akashdhar9412 he was not at all addicted to gambling, not even 1% because he himself calls it Adharm and he accepts that he doesn't know to play it (even Krishna while reminding Karna his sins there Krishna too says the same that Yudhishthir didn't know anything of how to play the Dyut).. when a person doesn't know to play and just considers it adharm & sin, how can he be even slightly addicted to the game he doesn't know to play?
is kalpnik mahabharat pr log isko sch btane k lliye kitna jhuut bolte hain social media pr
Teri kalpanik baat par kisi ko bhi koi bharosa nahi hai....😆😆😆😆
@@Alien-user 5000 sal pehele isne Mahabharata dekhi thi kya jo iti bate chod rhi hh
@@TarunKumar-hy3yx Lagta hai tune 5000 saal pehle sab dekha tha 😆😆😆😆
@@Alien-user bhai mujhe is chutiya pne m koi interest nhi h 😂😂😂😂