संवाद # 15: Ami Ganatra tells real tales of Mahabharat & its characters, busts many popular myths

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 20. 07. 2024
  • #vaad #mahabharat #amiganatra
    Ami Ganatra is an alumna of Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad (IIMA). A management professional, she is also a devout yoga practitioner, a certified yoga instructor, and a student of Sanskrit and Indian knowledge systems.
    Her book Mahabharata Unravelled: Lesser-Known Facets of a Well-Known History brings to light fascinating details and aspects of the people and events in the great epic not commonly known, to answer some often-asked questions and clarify prevalent myths. You can order your copy here: www.amazon.in/Mahabharata-Unr...
    0:00 Intro
    1:28 सम्बोधन in Mahabharat
    4:32 Real character of Draupadi
    16:37 Polyandry in Mahabharat times
    24:56 Real Yudhishthir
    35:08 Dharmaraj Yudhishthir & वस्त्रहरण
    45:37 Arjun of Ved Vyasa Mahabharat
    51:37 Age of characters in Mahabharat
    56:08 बेचारा Karna? No. His real character
    1:11:08 BR Chopra’s Shakuni
    1:17:48 Why Itihasa is important
    1:27:35 Eklavya & caste discrimination

Komentáře • 4,6K

  • @swaminarayandhyan2857
    @swaminarayandhyan2857 Před rokem +288

    Mahabharat is our history. So happy that a highly educated person like Ami has chosen to mention ‘History’ on the cover of her book.

    • @yug4883
      @yug4883 Před rokem +8

      1:06:52 by mistake she said Arjun, it was said by Fake Lower Caste Sut Putr Karn, thank you

    • @rajeshwarikarthikeyan5941
      @rajeshwarikarthikeyan5941 Před rokem +4

      The word she used is itihaas. Literal translation would be history but the word itihaas has more depth and meaning, not just a narrative of the past.

    • @user-tx1dl3zx3h
      @user-tx1dl3zx3h Před rokem +2

      ​@@rajeshwarikarthikeyan5941 😊wwwwww 😊😘

    • @sahilrathee5909
      @sahilrathee5909 Před rokem +2

      Sachai bta rhe ho to puri btao na unke real name se bulao na unko.

    • @Krishna_Ke_Parth
      @Krishna_Ke_Parth Před rokem

      Mahabharat Is Not Our History
      It Is Our Past Present Future All
      Mahabharat Is Happening All Around Us

  • @sanjaymisra8657
    @sanjaymisra8657 Před rokem +116

    What a talent, what an effort! I am proud that such people like Ami are there to keep the light of ancient gyan alive. My salute 🙏 👏

    • @roganstone4979
      @roganstone4979 Před rokem +2

      Mahamurkh yeh prani , 😂 apne mannn ke Mahabharata likh de aur aap log bewakoof bhi ban gaye

    • @sandeepsuman6381
      @sandeepsuman6381 Před rokem +1

      @@roganstone4979 or tune toh soni putra karna dekh ke seekha hai naa 😅😆

    • @RealFriends-
      @RealFriends- Před rokem

      @@roganstone4979 😮ll😮p😅o😅

  • @krishanroy7412
    @krishanroy7412 Před 2 lety +280

    Thanks! Please keep making content about our civilizational interests.

    • @the_bhartiya_spirit
      @the_bhartiya_spirit Před rokem +13

      Thanks for donation sir 💙🙏

    • @myp1600
      @myp1600 Před rokem +3

      👏👏

    • @pavansharma1300
      @pavansharma1300 Před rokem

      Ha toh sab ka sab ek tarfa story bana do har jagah bhagwan hi ache dikhao .bhsdk walo esa he toh ye mahabharat ramayan dekhenhi kyu .tumhare god he great he band kardo kuch dekhna ,┐(‘~`;)┌.castist racist logo kabhi tumne apni behen ki bhai ki shadi down caste me ki he .?.aaj char warna nahihe char caste nahihe According to constitution there are more than 2000 castes .koi bhi sadhu guru maharaj kabhi bhi intercaste marriage k liye protsahan nahi deta .agar koi intercaste ki baat kare toh tum logo k dukan band ho jayege .bade aye gyan dene wale kapti hindu

    • @yug4883
      @yug4883 Před rokem +3

      1:06:52 by mistake she said Arjun, it was said by Fake Lower Caste Sut Putr Karn, thank you

    • @Plwnder1550
      @Plwnder1550 Před 9 měsíci

      Thanks s10 edr bhi bhej do jab mare pass ayega m aggy kisi ko dekar jauga jab Malik de bhai ji tq

  • @ranjeetnaik
    @ranjeetnaik Před 9 měsíci +23

    Very well explained and clarified, how its shown in TV series its very different. In the "Suryaputra Karna" series, Arjuna's character is portrayed as less powerful in battle, while the show predominantly highlights Karna's greatness as a warrior.

    • @jyotitiwari4298
      @jyotitiwari4298 Před 8 měsíci +5

      Agree and people rather than reading real puranas they more believe serials and portray Karn as hero and Arjun as a loser 🤦🤦I was not sure bt always confused about his character and was more inclined towards Arjun... ❤️

    • @iarj_004abhi4
      @iarj_004abhi4 Před 8 měsíci +2

      That is too toxic serial, stay away from that.

    • @chennabasavasheri9016
      @chennabasavasheri9016 Před 3 měsíci

      IF KARNA WAS NOT POWERFULL WHY KRISHNA SAVED ARJUN FORM HIM ?
      HE SAVED ARJUN FORM NAGASTRA, INDRA ASTHRA.

  • @abhishekbansal9117
    @abhishekbansal9117 Před 2 lety +389

    I enjoyed listening her more than watching the tv serial.
    Full modern, funny, educational , interesting yet accurate discussion on Mahabharat.

    • @durgeshprasadroutray5289
      @durgeshprasadroutray5289 Před rokem +3

      I agreed

    • @roganstone4979
      @roganstone4979 Před rokem +8

      @@durgeshprasadroutray5289 dissagrred agar jhuth sunne ka Sauk hai toh sunno

    • @dakshsharma1703
      @dakshsharma1703 Před rokem +12

      @@roganstone4979 She's quoting from Ved Vyasa's Mahabharat, how is it a jhuth?

    • @roganstone4979
      @roganstone4979 Před rokem +2

      @@dakshsharma1703 wahi toh problem hai Bhai yeh ved vyas ki Mahabharata se bol rahe hai , jo approx 500sal Pehle nast ho gye thee 😂😂😂. Aur tumlog aise jhooton ke baat maan lete ho ,
      Aur abhi jo version hai vo mostly vaisanpaine ke hai ( student of ved vyas , who used 2000 more shloka's to glorify pandav's, like virat war )......
      If you really support our culture and heritage and warrior's which our history has build's you should ask her questions not me 🙏🙏

    • @dakshsharma1703
      @dakshsharma1703 Před rokem +10

      @@roganstone4979 What's she's telling is inn accordance to Bori which is the most accurate so doesn't matter, she's mostly right. Also Pandavas are the protagonist of Ved vyasa mahabharat too, Arjuna is the main character of Mahabharat!

  • @harshadk4264
    @harshadk4264 Před 2 lety +888

    The nation needs intellectuals like Ami Ganatra.

    • @Krishnaaaaa_777
      @Krishnaaaaa_777 Před 2 lety +13

      Agreed🙏

    • @riteshthakur8584
      @riteshthakur8584 Před 2 lety +5

      #sattology pls watch this also. Research base.

    • @vipinreshammiya9937
      @vipinreshammiya9937 Před 2 lety +7

      Great and clear narration by Ami. She is no doubt an asset to our country. Must be awarded by the Government.

    • @harekrishna2291
      @harekrishna2291 Před 2 lety +3

      czcams.com/play/PLzT1yw_wugHB8lcho3VBnkkMwl36KwThb.html 🙏 Hare Krishna Hari bol 👍🙏😀

    • @abhimannukumarsingh8068
      @abhimannukumarsingh8068 Před 2 lety +8

      There are some wrong information in this debate regarding meat eating. There is no meat eating in Mahabharata and Ramayan. Do read sanskrit to hindi translation there is a word in Sanskrit called Maasam, that means fruits inside part....there is no mention of meat or fish at all. All these English translation done by Max Muller and his companions. There are 46 letters in Sanskrit and 26 letters in English. How can someone translate Sanskrit in English. Ye sab Kiya gya sirf hinduon ko badnaam krne ke liye 😡😡😡

  • @purbashachatterjee9042
    @purbashachatterjee9042 Před 6 měsíci +9

    Madam from my very childhood I am very fascinated by Mahabharat by Maharishi Vedvysa, I read a lot . Something I regret that if I could talk to you front to front. You are really fabulous Madam. Always you highlight the right thing.

  • @sumitrasrivastava3258
    @sumitrasrivastava3258 Před 9 měsíci +2

    Best ever explanations of so many misunderstood, missing, complex and most important aspects of Mahabharat. What a great fete to hear such a beautiful descriptions.

  • @superbatman4139
    @superbatman4139 Před 2 lety +479

    Her deep knowledge and command on Sanskrit and scriptures is astounding and heard her vivid explanation with rapt attention.keep going, we need learned people like you. With lots of respect.

    • @yellowglove793
      @yellowglove793 Před 2 lety +11

      How you reached this conclusion she has deep knowledge. I can also use same number of Sanskrit words.

    • @anjalikandhari3283
      @anjalikandhari3283 Před 2 lety +2

      👍🏼yes

    • @dharmayodha4436
      @dharmayodha4436 Před 2 lety +19

      @@yellowglove793 so you have ego problems with her?

    • @Abhijeetkumar737
      @Abhijeetkumar737 Před 2 lety +3

      Abey kuchh nahi hai. Bas dikhawa hai isko to koi bhi aasani se debunk kr skta hai

    • @bilanmali7081
      @bilanmali7081 Před 2 lety +6

      @@yellowglove793 Abey chutiye what precludes you for doing so then

  • @vinitkumar2644
    @vinitkumar2644 Před 2 lety +345

    Finally... Finally someone is talking what I have been trying to explain to my family and friends.. BR chopra mahabharat is not real mahabharat and rashmirathi is not real karna

    • @sunilbalooni5137
      @sunilbalooni5137 Před 2 lety +17

      Yes truth will prevail at last

    • @mmBharath2024
      @mmBharath2024 Před 2 lety +43

      There could be simple wrong interpretations. But BR Chopra did an excellent service to India with the show. We should never undermine his contribution.

    • @siddarth3955
      @siddarth3955 Před 2 lety +18

      Neither is her interpretation real. She and the host outright hate Karna and are hardcore praising arjun Draupadi. Karna in Mahabharat is shown as a positive character only. Nothing is going to change it.

    • @bu11ymaguire
      @bu11ymaguire Před 2 lety +15

      @@siddarth3955 yeah! Would have been better if he brought one more scholar of Mahabharata with a different pov who could ask counter questions...
      This wasn't vaad. This was just a narrative and one pov.

    • @siddarth3955
      @siddarth3955 Před 2 lety +20

      @@bu11ymaguire He wouldn't. He hates Karna so why would he do that? He had previously also insulted Karn. Also this so called author cherry picked verses and is acting as if Karna is negative character and saying 'I am not anti Karna, Vyasa Mahabharat is'.
      This one verse from Vyasa Mahabharat destroys her argument:
      """Thus fell that hero who was a Kalpa tree unto those swarms of birds represented by suitors. Solicited by suitors he always said, "I give" but never the words "I have not!" The righteous always regarded him as a righteous person.""
      -Karna Parva, Section-94, Vyasa Mahabharat.
      Also her claim that Karna wasn't low caste or casteism didn't exist just to belittle his humiliations are also false. Karna was insulted for his caste in many places, once he even tells Bhishma not to insult him as 'low born' since he has always followed practises or Kshatriyas alone. All in all, it's just another dumb writer with her own interpretation.
      Not just this, there are also places where Pandavas actions were extremely questionable like Arjun burning Khandiva forest. In actual epic it was basically a genocide of all the innocent naga people and animals in the forest but somehow we aren't supposed to question it. Any person with two brain cells would be shocked at the description of the genocide mentioned in the text but we are still supposed to accept unquestionably like abrahamic faith.
      She also spoke as if Karna abandoned Duryodhan with gandharvas while in reality Karna destroyed half the Gandharva army and was overcome with illusion, all his weapons and chariot was destroyed, etc. That's when he retreated and the so called gandharvas were themselves sent by Arjuna's father Indra to humiliate Kauravas and protect Pandavas. Arjun also did the same thing when Dwarka robbers attacked but she wouldn't mention that.
      I would only suggest, read actual epic. You will find such CZcams channels or authors everywhere. This particular author even seems to totally take her knowledge from Quora.
      She also said Satyaki defeated Karna but it never happened. As per BORI CE, on 14th day Karna made Satyaki satyaki chariotless. Then the latter got on lord Krishna's celestial chariot and he inturn made Karna chariotless, then Satyaki defeated other kaurav warriors who came there. Karna then got on a new chariot and resumed his fight with Satyaki, how is this defeat? Karna made satyaki chariotless and Satyaki did the same for Karna. These are just some small refutations of her rants against Karna.
      Even Arjun was defeated by many. Victory and defeat is not constant in war. That's why Mahabharat is realistic but this author has made it into Bollywood masala flick where one hero is undefeated and rest are all villains or side characters.

  • @o-PSG-o
    @o-PSG-o Před rokem +4

    What a podcast it was, Amiji has true passion for Indian vedic history and her research enlightens people like me I would like to thank the host as he had not interrupted her during the podcast. India has such a rich history and it should be taught in schools/universities in it's purest form. sara duniya bhar ka literature fika hai Mahabharat Ramayan k samne abb jisse isse poems ya story samajna hai samje aur jo jaisa amiji ne kaha humara itihas maan na chahte hai woh itihas mane but nothing can even come close to these epics. Jai Shree Krishna.

  • @andygrover7088
    @andygrover7088 Před 8 měsíci +6

    बहुत सुंदर विष्लेषण और सामायिक! हिन्दुओं को सही इतिहास बताने के लिए धन्यवाद एमी जी।

  • @LaxmanPrajapatRamRamSa
    @LaxmanPrajapatRamRamSa Před 2 lety +23

    साधो साधो,,अति उत्तम, 👍👌💐, जय जय नारायण हरि,,,नारी भी नारायणी👍💐,🙏🕉

  • @avinashjoshi5283
    @avinashjoshi5283 Před 2 lety +139

    Ami Ganatra (गणात्रा), we certainly need authorised young scholars like you to prove how our spiritual scriptures like Ramayana and Mahabharata are un-tarnished. I am really proud of you, Supreme bless you.!

    • @rashmigaur617
      @rashmigaur617 Před rokem +3

      How do you say she is saying correct?

    • @avinashjoshi5283
      @avinashjoshi5283 Před rokem +1

      If any soul simply want to raise doubts without any proper authentication or reasons, on the credibility of any proven scholar, then anyone is free to do so.! Even such persons can raise doubts on Lord Krishna, Vedas Rushis like Vyasa, or latest like Swami Vivekananda and so on...! Have your own ways and pleased yourself!

    • @harshadk4264
      @harshadk4264 Před rokem +2

      @@rashmigaur617 why don't you put forth a video with information that you know of after studying the verses. Please share the link. You are being negative for the sake of it else make a specific valid point.

    • @andhkasur
      @andhkasur Před rokem

      @@rashmigaur617 What do think BR Chopra's Mahabharat is correct?

    • @shantabalu
      @shantabalu Před rokem +1

      @@andhkasur
      It is Ami ..... who is putting down B.R. Chopra....without any DOCUMENTED PROOF.
      Others have the same RIGHT to say ..... AMI is WRONG!!!.

  • @mavericksoul6587
    @mavericksoul6587 Před 9 měsíci +4

    The way Ami Mam narrates, one can listen to her for hours..

  • @akanksha6061
    @akanksha6061 Před 10 měsíci +2

    Its so relaxing and satisfying to see Ami Ganatra ji for clarifying so logically and politely.... always....! More power to you !😇🙏🙌

  • @chakradharsuryavanshi7694
    @chakradharsuryavanshi7694 Před 2 lety +24

    बहुत बहुत बहुत सुंदर मीमांसा।वह श्रष्टा आप शोधकर्ता बिटिया को एवम प्रस्तुतकर्ता को असीम स्नेह का आशीर्वाद प्रदान कर आप जैसे युवाओं का मार्ग प्रशस्त करे और यशस्वी शतायु जीवन प्रदान करें।🙏🙏🙏❤️❤️❤️

  • @Jai_Gauranga_RadhaShyamsundar

    इस video की सबसे अच्छी बात ये है कि कर्ण की वास्तविकता बताई गई है। ये बहुत आवश्यक था। क्योंकि आज कल कर्ण को बहुत अधिक महिमामंडित करके tv पर दिखाया जाता है जो कि अनुचित है।

    • @sanatangyan1056
      @sanatangyan1056 Před 2 lety +5

      महाभारत में कर्ण भले दुर्योधन की तरफ था फिर भी महान था.

    • @Jai_Gauranga_RadhaShyamsundar
      @Jai_Gauranga_RadhaShyamsundar Před 2 lety +21

      @@sanatangyan1056 Tv serial dekh kar bol rahe hain aap. Mahabharat padhiye. Tv serial par vishwas mat keejiye.

    • @Kapil.527
      @Kapil.527 Před rokem

      Par mujhe isme tark ki baat to kahi nahi bhai

    • @Kapil.527
      @Kapil.527 Před rokem

      Agar karn aur duryodhan itne powerfully hai jo itna bada yudhdh karwa De ye baat kujh hajam nahi hui

    • @mohit6941
      @mohit6941 Před rokem +5

      she is justifying casteism which is not whole truth because she must know as per vedas upper caste man (upper verna) can marry lower caste women (lower verna) , even it is allow in manusmriti, but not allow lower caste/Verna man to marry upper caste/verna women: that was discrimination: can easily seen in Mahabharata.

  • @QoSabKuch
    @QoSabKuch Před rokem +6

    Sanskrit learning is so important for all Indians

  • @JagadeeshAithal
    @JagadeeshAithal Před rokem +6

    The best view of our epics and the cause of narrating them to the humanity by the likes of Valmiki & VedaVyasa. Kudos to @vaad & Ami Ganatra.🙏🙏🙏

  • @ni2says
    @ni2says Před 2 lety +269

    Mahabharat is a real epic. To write such a complex itihas in such an ancient time is just breathtaking.

    • @pavansharma1300
      @pavansharma1300 Před rokem

      Ha toh sab ka sab ek tarfa story bana do har jagah bhagwan hi ache dikhao .bhsdk walo esa he toh ye mahabharat ramayan dekhenhi kyu .tumhare god he great he band kardo kuch dekhna ,┐(‘~`;)┌.castist racist logo kabhi tumne apni behen ki bhai ki shadi down caste me ki he .?.aaj char warna nahihe char caste nahihe According to constitution there are more than 2000 castes .koi bhi sadhu guru maharaj kabhi bhi intercaste marriage k liye protsahan nahi deta .agar koi intercaste ki baat kare toh tum logo k dukan band ho jayege .bade aye gyan dene wale kapti hindu

    • @user-wq2rb5jh6c
      @user-wq2rb5jh6c Před rokem +4

      Exactly bro us time itna bada puran likhna bhot bdi bat h

    • @doom5950
      @doom5950 Před rokem

      its not written its actually happened you dumbo

    • @uprightwalkingape3483
      @uprightwalkingape3483 Před rokem +3

      Lol. History my a$&. Plagiarism from Homer’s Oddesey. Mixed with Persian stories

    • @Knighted_Alexander
      @Knighted_Alexander Před rokem

      @@uprightwalkingape3483 wow chutiye you mean all those microscopic details are from Persia? Persia ke paas sand ke alawa kya tha? You are a moron of Highest order.

  • @sanskarsuresh8658
    @sanskarsuresh8658 Před 2 lety +48

    महाभारत और उसमें मौजूद चरित्रों की ऐसी स्पष्ट एवं सुन्दर विवरण पहली बार सुनने को मिला। धन्यवाद अरिहंत भाई🙏

  • @rachit676
    @rachit676 Před 11 měsíci +5

    WHAT A REALITY CHECK!!! Great description of Panchali and also showed the reality of karna very well.👍

  • @aparnadharmadhikari4772
    @aparnadharmadhikari4772 Před rokem +3

    Very good explanation. Madam you must let more and more people know the true Mahabharata. Best of luck for all your future endeavours

  • @sm2714
    @sm2714 Před 2 lety +289

    As a individual of today’s generation I appreciate a perspective on history and its characters that’s from someone young that explained it with such simplicity and clarity. The truth is not as complicated as it made out to be.

    • @abhimannukumarsingh8068
      @abhimannukumarsingh8068 Před 2 lety +6

      There are some wrong information in this debate regarding meat eating. There is no meat eating in Mahabharata and Ramayan. Do read sanskrit to hindi translation there is a word in Sanskrit called Maasam, that means fruits inside part....there is no mention of meat or fish at all. All these English translation done by Max Muller and his companions. There are 46 letters in Sanskrit and 26 letters in English. How can someone translate Sanskrit in English. Ye sab Kiya gya sirf hinduon ko badnaam krne ke liye 😡😡😡

    • @RojaJaneman
      @RojaJaneman Před 2 lety

      Ur history and identity r essential for ur existence. If anyone tells u otherwise, know that either they’re a f00l or a t00l

    • @montysharma8271
      @montysharma8271 Před rokem +6

      @@abhimannukumarsingh8068 meat can be eaten only by Chatriyas if it was hunted by the individual chatriya or their family members not by others.

    • @roganstone4979
      @roganstone4979 Před rokem

      And as an individual one should believe in proof's and their own intellectual's and consciousness too . Rather then just believing whatever one is speaking out of his mouth . ( She very worng with many characters most with karn and Arjun)

  • @akanshasingh3645
    @akanshasingh3645 Před 2 lety +88

    People giving gyan in comments and questioning her years long research after searching the answer from google 😂😂

    • @raj49449
      @raj49449 Před 2 lety +2

      She is very knowledgeable

    • @nitin1202
      @nitin1202 Před 2 lety +1

      @@account-su5ic tum batao tumhare hisab se gyanj vyakti ki definition

    • @mohinderpal2872
      @mohinderpal2872 Před 2 lety

      @@nitin1202 यह किसी के लिए ‘तुम’ ‘ तुम्हारा ‘ जैसे शब्दों का प्रयोग सभ्य और असभ्य होने का परिचायक होता है।

    • @abhimannukumarsingh8068
      @abhimannukumarsingh8068 Před 2 lety

      There are some wrong information in this debate regarding meat eating. There is no meat eating in Mahabharata and Ramayan. Do read sanskrit to hindi translation there is a word in Sanskrit called Maasam, that means fruits inside part....there is no mention of meat or fish at all. All these English translation done by Max Muller and his companions. There are 46 letters in Sanskrit and 26 letters in English. How can someone translate Sanskrit in English. Ye sab Kiya gya sirf hinduon ko badnaam krne ke liye 😡😡😡

    • @vikasgautam1082
      @vikasgautam1082 Před rokem

      @@abhimannukumarsingh8068 agree

  • @saurabhmathur9363
    @saurabhmathur9363 Před rokem +14

    I think distortions happen because people in general don't like thought provoking narratives; which these epics are; but they want your regular variety "masala" narrative with all sorts of modern drama.

  • @priyadayan3998
    @priyadayan3998 Před 6 měsíci +2

    Great work ami ji

  • @expressdaycoffee
    @expressdaycoffee Před 2 lety +376

    Happy to see IIM grads like Ami doing a research on our Itihasa and sharing her interpretations . We indians, mostly looked at our itihasa from a foreigners point of view. Primary researches like of Ami's is most required .

    • @sharmaabhishek202020
      @sharmaabhishek202020 Před 2 lety +16

      she is also having foreign point of view, she is not able to hold the viewpoint that bheeshma age could be 150+ at time of mahabharat war

    • @shikharverma5669
      @shikharverma5669 Před 2 lety +19

      @@sharmaabhishek202020 Yeah, but it's very common to find people aged 102-3 years in Nepal, Bhutan and India also Bheesham lived very early when air food etc must have been great

    • @sharmaabhishek202020
      @sharmaabhishek202020 Před 2 lety +10

      @@shikharverma5669 bhai mein sirf yeh kehna chah raha thaa kee...
      1) interviewer is giving reference to B.R Chopra mahabharat(which will never be/ and should not be, reference point of itihass)
      2) writer Ami is not able to hold her view point strongly that bhishma was 150+, as before pandavas bheeshma had seen 3-4 generations of kuru rajvansh.

    • @sharmaabhishek202020
      @sharmaabhishek202020 Před 2 lety +2

      @Vinamra Singhai and from where leftist ideology came from mr singhal?

    • @gauravpandey5118
      @gauravpandey5118 Před 2 lety

      Mahabharata is history or mythology..? bcoz majority of people said tha Ramayana and Mahabharata is a mythology not history.

  • @thunderml8310
    @thunderml8310 Před 2 lety +153

    She is so passionate I love the way she explained everything in details 😊❤️

    • @roganstone4979
      @roganstone4979 Před rokem +2

      So sweet, 😂😂😂😂. Knowledge ...... A 9 class child could understand a character after reading a story, but she's just .
      Meri Mahabharata ,😂😂😂

    • @shubhamraj7116
      @shubhamraj7116 Před 10 měsíci +1

      misleading information dont follow her narrative, she is saying that karna donate his kavach kundal for his selfishness. Foolish girl

  • @esmitashrestha08
    @esmitashrestha08 Před 7 měsíci +2

    Maine bohot sari Mahabharata sey related podcast suni hay but inki Ami Ganatra ki baat hi kuch alag hay❤ jis tarah sey yeh bhyakhya karti hay bada ananda aata hay sunn kar ❤.

  • @tiwariri
    @tiwariri Před rokem +2

    Really great analysis of Mahabharat and narration. Thanks for bringing up real facts.

  • @ravitex123
    @ravitex123 Před 2 lety +16

    मैं जब आज के जेनरेसन को अपने इतिहास को खोजते , जानने और समझने की कोशिश करते देखता हूँ तो खुशी और आनंद के आंसुओं से आंखे भींग जाती है और अपने देश संस्कृति के सुरक्षित भविष्य के लिए एक निश्चिंतता का

  • @nipunjoshi8238
    @nipunjoshi8238 Před 2 lety +66

    Everyone should learn about a story narrated to Yuddhisthir in Van Parva about Nishad King Nal and his romantic adventures with the Vidarbha Kingdom princess Damyanti and his friendship with king Rituparna of Ayodhya who was an ancestor of Shree Ram to know if at all there was any birth based "discrimination" against this Nishad tribe.

    • @Raghava9
      @Raghava9 Před 2 lety

      Dhanyawad

    • @dakshsharma1703
      @dakshsharma1703 Před rokem +3

      Nala is not from Nishaada tribe, Nishadha was his Kingdom, Eklavya was from Nishaada tribe, son of Hiranyadhanu.

    • @jojosoni
      @jojosoni Před rokem

      @@dakshsharma1703 nishadh tribe ke leader ko nishadhraj kaha jata hai. Satyavati k pita ko bhu nishadhraj kaha gaya tha, jaha tak muje yaad hai

    • @dakshsharma1703
      @dakshsharma1703 Před rokem +2

      @@jojosoni Here they distinguish between nishaad (निषाद) and nishadha (निषध). Nishadha seems to have been a kingdom. Nishaad is a forest dweller/ Hunter tribe sort of. Ekalavya was a nishaad but nala was from Nishadha kingdom. They may however have correlation. See Kingdoms participating in the Mahabharata war nishaad on the Pandava side but nishadha on the Kaurava side.

    • @jojosoni
      @jojosoni Před rokem

      @@dakshsharma1703 i don't know how much is your answer true, but your last line is confusing. Nishadh is like caste, it's not a tribe living in a fixed place. So, did every nishadh tribe joined kaurava 🤔?
      Also, if there is a distinction between them, why did u use 1 word for both of them in previous comment.
      I'm not arguing with u here, just wondering

  • @JaiAcharya
    @JaiAcharya Před 10 měsíci +2

    Very interesting and amazing narratives. Highly Impressive with authentic references.

  • @SamprashnaJSB
    @SamprashnaJSB Před rokem +3

    Excellent episode, man! Great efforts by Ami Ganatra!!! This reflects my knowledge from HH ShriMadhwacharya's (12-13th century AD) "Mahabharata-Tatparya-Nirnayah"

  • @MB-cg9tc
    @MB-cg9tc Před 2 lety +256

    *If Ami ji is reading this*
    Would request Ami ji to come out with a KIDS version of her book (with top notch visualisation)...very important to engage kids at a younger age
    You can even crowdfund this endeavour..give the first set of copies to anyone who donates

    • @AshwinSriram
      @AshwinSriram Před 2 lety +11

      Great idea - there are Mahabharata books for kids which are fully illustrated and available. One of them is sold by Ramakrishna Matha (you can find them online under the title' Pictorial Mahabharata' ) and another is sold by Amar Chitra Katha. Of course, these editions will vary in terms of the style, story telling, visuals and content. So would love Ami ji to create her own version which is perhaps more authentic and keeping in line with the original version.

    • @sarvathavicharsheel7487
      @sarvathavicharsheel7487 Před 2 lety +2

      @@AshwinSriram I don't think original version would be suitable for children

    • @sunilbalooni5137
      @sunilbalooni5137 Před 2 lety +1

      @@sarvathavicharsheel7487 kyun nahi

    • @sarvathavicharsheel7487
      @sarvathavicharsheel7487 Před 2 lety +3

      @@sunilbalooni5137 I don't think the elements like human staking, brutal killings or even Niyoga could be a part of children books

    • @MB-cg9tc
      @MB-cg9tc Před 2 lety +1

      @@AshwinSriram thanks for sharing this. Will definitely check those out.

  • @reejuvideo456
    @reejuvideo456 Před 2 lety +37

    42 to 46 --beautiful definition of itihash
    48 to 50 -- Karna was beaten in war by bhim, sartaki, abhimanyu, And Arjun --- Karna has been magnified in BR Chopra mahabharat serial

    • @kandiking2218
      @kandiking2218 Před 2 lety +10

      And also in Starplus and Suryaputra Karn

    • @vickydonor5922
      @vickydonor5922 Před 2 lety

      In Rashmirathi too...but I like Rashmirathi alot but not for karna but for Dinkar Ji's poetic magic.

    • @what-ij2dw
      @what-ij2dw Před rokem +1

      Pandavas too and Arjun too

    • @GoKu-yh7ks
      @GoKu-yh7ks Před rokem +2

      She is lying all about Karna

    • @kamalbharadwaj7842
      @kamalbharadwaj7842 Před rokem

      @@GoKu-yh7ks ok , than what is recounter ? pls point out from scripture of mahabharata im waiting , otherwise you r a blind blady fool not more then 🤣🤣🤣

  • @hegdebhavana
    @hegdebhavana Před rokem +6

    Thanks a lot sir
    I listen to ur podcasts everyday
    And the people who u invite as guests are truly giving us knowledge
    So continue the work please.
    We really appreciate it!

  • @Vesselofbliss
    @Vesselofbliss Před 9 měsíci +1

    Real eye opener and Very good job by host with well narrated, matured questions...and Ami ji's explanation is so profound and beautiful. Thank you 🙏

  • @sandhyadevi8661
    @sandhyadevi8661 Před 2 lety +19

    बहुत ही सुन्दर विश्लेषण बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद इस इंटरव्यू के लिए

  • @vasukinagabhushan
    @vasukinagabhushan Před 2 lety +32

    Most important aspect of Mahabharata is in it's wisdom and teachings.

  • @dhritidutta6231
    @dhritidutta6231 Před rokem +4

    This video really opened my eyes about many things.. God Bless You... 💕

  • @bobbundhoo3203
    @bobbundhoo3203 Před rokem +2

    awesome talk. with all the experience and expertise in filmmaking in India i m astonished why till now nobody has come come with a faithful and credible and undebatable version of mahabharat and ramayanam without personal, political or ethnic biases. history cannot be changed. ours is written black on white. europeans already distorted our history and it is the our responsibility and utmost priority to set it right for our future generations. people lke you Ami can do that. please go for it.

  • @little.knownfacts
    @little.knownfacts Před 2 lety +347

    I have become a fan of VAAD.. every episode is different from one another and truly informative.. and that studio experience where there is no disturbance and cracking voices and internet outages.. Well done Brother

    • @abhimannukumarsingh8068
      @abhimannukumarsingh8068 Před 2 lety +4

      There are some wrong information in this debate regarding meat eating. There is no meat eating in Mahabharata and Ramayan. Do read sanskrit to hindi translation there is a word in Sanskrit called Maasam, that means fruits inside part....there is no mention of meat or fish at all. All these English translation done by Max Muller and his companions. There are 46 letters in Sanskrit and 26 letters in English. How can someone translate Sanskrit in English. Ye sab Kiya gya sirf hinduon ko badnaam krne ke liye 😡😡😡

    • @AritU-jw5dv
      @AritU-jw5dv Před rokem +1

      @@abhimannukumarsingh8068 Hindu mass khate he khte the. Agastya muni ne ak bakri ke vesh dhari asur ko khake vadh kia tha. Veda vyas ki mata macchli pakrti thi, wo macchli to khane ke lie hi hain

  • @1Vcop
    @1Vcop Před 2 lety +9

    हर नए फैक्ट को सुनने के बाद और Like button को दबाने की मन कर रहा था। आमी जी बहुत ही कुशल लेखिका है, एवं एक बहतरीन इंसान है। 💖💖

  • @creator_rishu
    @creator_rishu Před 9 měsíci +1

    love Ami's voice. Especially when she recites sanskrit. I can hear her speaking Sanskrit all day and night.

  • @shashib2820
    @shashib2820 Před 8 měsíci +1

    Hi Ami….Really Proud of you for doing this. Correcting the wrong narratives is very essential today.

  • @rashmichaturvedi3836
    @rashmichaturvedi3836 Před 2 lety +39

    एक गम्भीर विस्तृत महागाथा का तात्कालिक परिस्थतियों के सन्दर्भ में बड़ा रोचक, सरल और सारगर्भित चित्रण। धर्म की सुन्दर व्याख्या। इतिहास की सर्वोत्तम परिभाषा। काल की उचित गणना का प्रयास। सराहनीय
    बहुत बहुत बधाई प्रश्न पूछने वाले और उत्तर देने वाले दोनों को ही।

  • @PrakashKhanchandani
    @PrakashKhanchandani Před 2 lety +244

    Wow! Amazing discussion ... at around 48:00 she speaks about humility of Arjuna. That quality is not glorified much in popular culture but Mahabharata glorifies it.
    She has really captured the essence of all characters wonderfully.
    Everybody should hear from 57:00 about Suta putra Karna. Amazing myth busting. Thank you so much for bringing this out.

    • @califitworkout9211
      @califitworkout9211 Před 2 lety +4

      Exactly!

    • @preethamkulal5909
      @preethamkulal5909 Před 2 lety +26

      Totally different from what i believed about karn 😥😥

    • @krishnagopal3456
      @krishnagopal3456 Před 2 lety

      Satyam bruyaat, priyam Bruyaat
      Na vad apriyam Satya......
      Have you not heard this Sanskrit shloka..???. Ridiculous

    • @eashmishra2960
      @eashmishra2960 Před 2 lety +8

      Suta Putra nhi Surya Putra Karna

    • @PrakashKhanchandani
      @PrakashKhanchandani Před 2 lety +6

      @@eashmishra2960 Suta Putra, Surya Putra, Radheya ye sab naam Karna ke he hai Mahabharat mein aur inme se ek bhi naam kahi chotta nahi hai. Its your choice to call him Surya Putra and my choice to call him Suta Putra. Hope you know the meaning of Suta Putra, if not watch the video 😀

  • @shobhachamoli6136
    @shobhachamoli6136 Před rokem +1

    I luved the whole video....each & every concept was beautiflly explained...

  • @jalajasmelodies8880
    @jalajasmelodies8880 Před 8 měsíci +1

    Great 👍 more n more Youngsters shud join this flow ....happy to see Our epics r so freely discussed now .... Beautiful

  • @loke4321
    @loke4321 Před 2 lety +38

    ज्ञान वर्धक एपिसोड है !! अत्यंत आभारी हु !! हर हर महादेव !! अमी जी के आत्मविश्वास को सादर प्रणाम !!

  • @darshankworld
    @darshankworld Před 2 lety +4

    मैडम आपने बहूत सुंदर तरीके से विश्लेषण किया हैं महाभारत का ! मैं बी. आर. चोपड़ा साहब की महाभारत सीरियल का बहुत प्रशंसक हूं .

  • @joydeepghosh1781
    @joydeepghosh1781 Před rokem +1

    Very good. It has tremendous correlations, correspondences with The Iliad, which is also worthy of deep discussion, leading to a Proto Indo European past, mysterious homeland, religion, language.

  • @shyama5612
    @shyama5612 Před 9 měsíci +1

    I like Arihant's clean Hindi. Keep it up. it's the way to keep our language and vocabulary alive.

  • @pd6625
    @pd6625 Před 2 lety +213

    Wonderful discussion. Amiji's passion for Mahsbharat is visible by energy and spark when she explains. Arihant's patience to give guest all space makes all his interviews special. Thank you Arihant and Amiji 🙏

    • @vikas312yadav
      @vikas312yadav Před 2 lety +2

      In most of case i disagree with her .. Inhonne karna ke daan ko jo kavch kundal daan kr rha h usse ese bataya h jasse bhut choti baat h uski importance pta nhi shayad inhe ..kavch kundal dena matlab life threat tha khud ke liye ..apni jeet ko dena matlab usse inhonne bhut chota krke bataya dusri baat inhone bola ki karna ne drona ko kaha ki brahman h ye toh derrpok h ...usse pahle batati h karna ki mata bhraman thi .. Matlab koi apni maa ke liye esa kyu bolega ? 3rd inhonne jis hisab se yudhishthir ko defend kiya kamaal h matlab inhonne ese dikhaya ki bechara yudhishthir kya kr skta tha juwa khelne ka mann itna kr gya ki bhai patni aur khud ko lga diya ..aur usse hum dharmaraj bol rhe h jisne sbse bda dharm kiya ...ye esa h jaisa apni patni ko bazaar me paiso me bech dena ...usko mai kbhi dharm raj nhi keh skta hun ..balki mai usse duryodhan jitna hi adharmi manta hun ...

    • @samitmathur007
      @samitmathur007 Před 2 lety +4

      @@vikas312yadav @vikas yadav कर्ण को कैसे याद करते हैं? दानवीर कर्ण...!! महादानी तो एक कर्ण था, कोई बराबरी कर सकता. कवच-कुंडल एक दिव्य उपहार जो कि जन्मतः कर्ण के देह से जुड़ा था. जानते बूझते कि याचक स्वयं इन्द्र देव हैं, उसने रत्ती भर समय नहीं लगाया और कवच कुंडल को शरीर से अलग कर इन्द्रदेव को दे दिया... अमी ने इस दान को कमतर आंका... मुझे ऐसा नहीं लगता!!
      कर्ण की माता के लिए जो कहा, उसे शायद आप समझ नहीं पाए... एमी ने आज के परिपेक्ष्य में कहा, क्योंकि ऐसी भ्रांतियां एक षड्यंत्र के तहत फैलाई गईं की कर्ण को एक रथी के परिवार में हुआ... ज़रा ध्यान से सुनिए, जो वर्ण व्यवस्था थी वह व्यक्ति के प्रोफेशन को लेकर बनाई गई थी... ना कि जन्म के द्वारा !! अगर ऐसा होता तो कर्ण को तो फिर रथ संचालन का स्पेशलिस्ट होना था... ? ये बातें कपटपूर्वक डाली गई, ताकि आप अपने पूर्वजों पर गर्व नहीं करें... विकास, ये जो स्वयम को लिब्रान्दू कहते हैं जिनसे बड़ा सनातन धर्म का नुकसान हुआ... अपने पूर्वजों पर गर्व करो... आज यही मैसेज हम सब हिंदुओं को समझना चाहिए!!
      समझदार लोग गलती नही निकालते, अपितु मेसेज क्या है, उसको समझकर उपयुक्त आचरण करने की अपेक्षा रसखि गई... आप यंग हो इसलिए जो कहा जा रहा है उसे सही context में समझना होगा... शुभकामनाएं

    • @vikas312yadav
      @vikas312yadav Před 2 lety +1

      @@samitmathur007 sumit ji apne jo samjha aur jo kaha mai uska aadar krta hun ...aur mujhe pta karn kshetriya aur bhraman ka putra tha ..mujhe pta h usse samaj me aur logon se acha aadar mila hoga ..kyuki vo kisi aam sarthi ka putr nhi tha..usse samaj me auro ke barabar pr raja aur yuvraj se kam aadar mila hoga ..prantu ap mere baat samjh nhi rhe h ..ami ji jo explanation de rhi h usse hi contradict kr rhi h ..hame pta h karn ki mata bhraman thi, karn ka guru bhagwan parshuram bhraman the ...toh vo kisi aur bhraman ko darpok kese bol skta h ? Ami ji ki language esi thi explain krne me ki unhone bola ki yudhishthir je juaa khela ho gya excitement me vo samjh nhi paye ..lekin vo juaa khelna hi sbse bda adharam ..kyuki usme unhone khud ko , apne bhaiyon aur yha tak ki apni patni ko juee me lga diya .. Matlab isse bda adharm kuch nhi h ..toh mujhe lgta h duryodhan aur yudhishthir dono ne uss sabha me sbse bda adharm kiya tha. Aur jaisa apne btaya ki karn ne apne body ke part diye the daan me matlab ek hisab se khud ki zindagi de di daan me ... Isko ami ji ne ese bataya ki daan diya toh kya ? Inder se vapis sakti bhi toh le li thi .....unhone shi se explanation nhi kiya mahabharat ka ..main bhagwan krishna ka follower hu jo shi h vhi bolunga..... Mahabharat me har character me kuch na kuch achi quality bhi thi aur kahrab bhi .. krishna ji ko chhod kr kyuki vo beyond the limit h..

    • @SanjayKumar-cf3bs
      @SanjayKumar-cf3bs Před 2 lety

      Jo lena hai lijiye.ye aapki soch par chhor diya gaya hai

    • @souradipmallick1550
      @souradipmallick1550 Před 2 lety

      Vikas shudra banke keh rahe ho toh Nishakhraj ko aur Maata Shabri ko yaad rakho Mahabharat mein Matsyagandha ko vi yaad rakhna barna chup rahna. Kuchh Janna nehi hein. Chuslam khalistani terroristani librandu jahil jihadi lefti ultra secular 72 hoora gang vrishchianism jaysa banna hein.

  • @KetanJayade
    @KetanJayade Před 2 lety +5

    Seriouosly आज कल के लड़कीयो से ये अपेक्षित नहीं किया जा सकता
    आपकी सोच कर्म resrearch ज्ञान कमाल का है, बहोत मेहनती है आप.
    You must be inspiration for not just today's Hindu women but also Hindu Mens.
    We must start all this from Veda.

  • @babitasaha535
    @babitasaha535 Před rokem

    What a loving description , it's amazing

  • @ellaar9
    @ellaar9 Před 8 měsíci +1

    It was a good conversation. Heard for the first time. A lot of information and Correction of history. Thank you.

  • @maheshdhyani9131
    @maheshdhyani9131 Před 2 lety +49

    कहीं ये बिटिया पिछले जन्म में स्वयं द्रौपदी तो नहीं थी। बहुत ही शानदार वर्णन किया है। बहुत बहुत बधाई इतने सत्य वाणी के लिए। एकदम सही कि द्रौपदी महानतम स्त्री थी।

    • @0077tyagi
      @0077tyagi Před 2 lety +6

      bhai itna b bhavnao mai mtt baho

    • @bilanmali7081
      @bilanmali7081 Před 2 lety +3

      Arey bas kar pagley. Aakh me aasoo aa gaye 😂

    • @raj49449
      @raj49449 Před 2 lety

      Mujhe v inke face me draupadi hi nazar ati hain

    • @Centerfiremedia
      @Centerfiremedia Před 2 lety

      एक झाल ख़रीद लें! फिर प्रशंसा भजन गाते चलिए

  • @drkuldipchandrakantbhaivel3254

    Bahot hi a6a vivaran. Breaking most of myth in common people with heart touching explanation. Hats off ami ganatra. 👍👍

  • @sunilkumarsahu6686
    @sunilkumarsahu6686 Před 9 měsíci +3

    बहन जी आपके सराहनीय कार्य के लिए ह्रदय से आभार हार्दिक शुभकामनाएं जय श्री राधे श्याम

  • @ronak4435
    @ronak4435 Před rokem +13

    so, Draupadi was the embodiment of feminism. Today's feminists should look up to her before opening their mouths.

  • @SatishPradhan
    @SatishPradhan Před 2 lety +51

    Rarely in my life had I listened to any show related to a book promotion, and never bought a book after listing to one. But I have to say, I am fully impressed by the Knowledge, clarify of thoughts. Need to / Have to buy this buy, I am sold.

  • @mandavibarway5548
    @mandavibarway5548 Před 2 lety +4

    अरिहंत जी आप बहुत ही अनुपम कार्य कर रहे हैं।
    अमी जी की पुस्तक मैं ज़रूर खरीदूंगी।
    It was like an eye opener.

  • @rahulsbhatt
    @rahulsbhatt Před rokem

    Such a beautiful and insightful conversation!

  • @k-Sau8181
    @k-Sau8181 Před 9 měsíci

    Thank you for so much details ❤

  • @utkarshverma013
    @utkarshverma013 Před 2 lety +116

    Thank you, CZcams for recommending me this video. It's one of the best podcasts I have ever listened to. Take a bow Ami ji. 🙏

    • @abhimannukumarsingh8068
      @abhimannukumarsingh8068 Před 2 lety +2

      There are some wrong information in this debate regarding meat eating. There is no meat eating in Mahabharata and Ramayan. Do read sanskrit to hindi translation there is a word in Sanskrit called Maasam, that means fruits inside part....there is no mention of meat or fish at all. All these English translation done by Max Muller and his companions. There are 46 letters in Sanskrit and 26 letters in English. How can someone translate Sanskrit in English. Ye sab Kiya gya sirf hinduon ko badnaam krne ke liye 😡😡😡

    • @roganstone4979
      @roganstone4979 Před rokem

      Bow , 😂😂😂 ...... Isse acha hai ki admai gadhe se yaari karle .

  • @dhruveshsureshrathi8462
    @dhruveshsureshrathi8462 Před 2 lety +21

    Age of Pandavs and Krishna and dates of Mahabharata are calculated by Nilesh Oak sir (Arjun and Krishna age at time of was was approx 80, 90 yrs) .. plz have a session with him !!!

  • @Indian-er6li
    @Indian-er6li Před rokem +2

    Maam your voice is so sweet and fluent

  • @yashsharma8330
    @yashsharma8330 Před rokem

    Thank you thank you very much..... Really grateful to you for this work

  • @NirakarSethy
    @NirakarSethy Před 2 lety +65

    Very nice and neat translation. I love it. Draupadi’s character is well justified. But Mahabharata of BR Chopra is a limited television series. They have taken the most people said story so that people would connect.

    • @eashmishra2960
      @eashmishra2960 Před 2 lety +4

      But that was the Best Mahabharat till date

    • @abhimannukumarsingh8068
      @abhimannukumarsingh8068 Před 2 lety +3

      There are some wrong information in this debate regarding meat eating. There is no meat eating in Mahabharata and Ramayan. Do read sanskrit to hindi translation there is a word in Sanskrit called Maasam, that means fruits inside part....there is no mention of meat or fish at all. All these English translation done by Max Muller and his companions. There are 46 letters in Sanskrit and 26 letters in English. How can someone translate Sanskrit in English. Ye sab Kiya gya sirf hinduon ko badnaam krne ke liye 😡😡😡

  • @decodingmyroot
    @decodingmyroot Před 2 lety +15

    how beautifully Ami explains - I kept on staring at her - such a Sundher way. lovely smile too

  • @Achhyutam989
    @Achhyutam989 Před 9 měsíci +1

    Great detailing Ami ...❤❤❤ putting right perspective.

  • @rupalimarathe8266
    @rupalimarathe8266 Před rokem +1

    Such a deep knowledge.. thanks for sharing … so agreeing with Ami Ganatra…

  • @Krishna-lo9dt
    @Krishna-lo9dt Před 2 lety +73

    Her research will be so helpful for generations now and the generations to come. Common misconceptions about Mahabharata are beautifully explained by her. I'm grateful for her that she has led me one step closer to the authentic Ved Vyas Mahabharata

    • @abhimannukumarsingh8068
      @abhimannukumarsingh8068 Před 2 lety +2

      There are some wrong information in this debate regarding meat eating. There is no meat eating in Mahabharata and Ramayan. Do read sanskrit to hindi translation there is a word in Sanskrit called Maasam, that means fruits inside part....there is no mention of meat or fish at all. All these English translation done by Max Muller and his companions. There are 46 letters in Sanskrit and 26 letters in English. How can someone translate Sanskrit in English. Ye sab Kiya gya sirf hinduon ko badnaam krne ke liye 😡😡😡

    • @ijustfelldown
      @ijustfelldown Před rokem

      @@abhimannukumarsingh8068 Do you mean no Hindu should ever eat maans (meat) or that there is no rule about what you can eat?

    • @anahita-bn6cy
      @anahita-bn6cy Před 4 měsíci

      Abe lawre Hinduism is not a vegan religion.. Shakta traditions offer fish and meat to goddess and Bali is important part of the rituals ... Take your North Indian sensibility up your ass ​@@abhimannukumarsingh8068

  • @pranavanath
    @pranavanath Před 2 lety +127

    I read Mahabharat and Ami ji, you are the first person I've ever heard talking about Pandav's living in Kumhar house, ruling out caste discrimination and I will add one more point from Ramayan, Shri Ram staying in Guha's house. And about Draupadi's character.

    • @fakeking8860
      @fakeking8860 Před 2 lety +9

      It shows sri ram and pandavs did not discriminate....but caste discrimination 10,20,30,40,50etc years ago happen and continue to happen now too...

    • @debtanupatra3385
      @debtanupatra3385 Před 2 lety +14

      @@fakeking8860 Ravan was brahmin....also rakshas.

    • @fakeking8860
      @fakeking8860 Před 2 lety +5

      @@debtanupatra3385 yes that's what I said i agree about ramayan and mahabharat times....talk about present and recent past I.e few decades ago ...I'm interested in the dicrimation that is present now

    • @debtanupatra3385
      @debtanupatra3385 Před 2 lety +9

      @@fakeking8860 that is politics.

    • @fakeking8860
      @fakeking8860 Před 2 lety +6

      @@debtanupatra3385 that is the reality not just politics...but may be I am wrong to bring it in this context...thus is about distant history

  • @user-gh4zq2yt1b
    @user-gh4zq2yt1b Před 4 měsíci +1

    Perfect mind blowing thank u so much for this information 👏👏👏👏🙌🙌🙌🙌❤️❤️❤️❤️

  • @omjidwivedi4184
    @omjidwivedi4184 Před rokem

    Pura dimag fresh ho gya ab tak pata nahi kya kya sun rakha tha .. bahut bahut dhanyawad is podcast k liye

  • @ankit_s
    @ankit_s Před 2 lety +51

    Supremely enjoyable talk . I am now more curious to learn Sanskrit

    • @crypton_8l87
      @crypton_8l87 Před 2 lety +2

      Sanskrit Bharathi, The Sanskrit Channel (Uday Shreyas), Govt Sanskrit College in your own state. Plus several books by Geeta Press Gorakhpur

    • @abhimannukumarsingh8068
      @abhimannukumarsingh8068 Před 2 lety

      There are some wrong information in this debate regarding meat eating. There is no meat eating in Mahabharata and Ramayan. Do read sanskrit to hindi translation there is a word in Sanskrit called Maasam, that means fruits inside part....there is no mention of meat or fish at all. All these English translation done by Max Muller and his companions. There are 46 letters in Sanskrit and 26 letters in English. How can someone translate Sanskrit in English. Ye sab Kiya gya sirf hinduon ko badnaam krne ke liye 😡😡😡

    • @sakuradey6271
      @sakuradey6271 Před 2 lety +2

      @@abhimannukumarsingh8068 It wasn't Max Muller working by himself, we have to accept that medieval Hindus, particularly Brahmins are major cause of downfall. Just to get coveted jobs in Islamist n subsequently British states it's the Hindu Brahmins that forced changed the concept of Varna to mean caste. These Islamist Brahmins also reduced women to nothing.

  • @abhishekgadgil1146
    @abhishekgadgil1146 Před 2 lety +33

    Very enlightening and eye opening session Ami ji and Arihant ji. Have a request for you. Try to have one session about Ramayana and the stories related to it.

  • @Dasharath86
    @Dasharath86 Před 10 měsíci +2

    Dharm or adharm ki saklpana Kitna accha samjhaya hai❤

  • @Mr_chaudhary01
    @Mr_chaudhary01 Před rokem +2

    wow... learnt a lot from this podcast.thank you 🙏🏻

  • @rahulsreenivasan5494
    @rahulsreenivasan5494 Před 2 lety +4

    Saadhuvaad aap dono ko. I watched the video till the end. Start to finish without break. 👍👍👍👍👍....

  • @ananthshanbhogue5659
    @ananthshanbhogue5659 Před 2 lety +23

    I have no words to explain how the real mahabharth of Lord Vedavyas was made known wonderfully All my Pranams

  • @AmitKumar-oy5oy
    @AmitKumar-oy5oy Před rokem +1

    Such an eye opening detail and explanation.

  • @sandeshp6270
    @sandeshp6270 Před rokem

    It's blessing to hear Ami.... Her Hindi is very sweet on the ears

  • @arvindjadeja
    @arvindjadeja Před 2 lety +7

    Wow! What a podcast and what a narrator of Mahabharat. Respect to the Lady.

  • @nikitasangroula9313
    @nikitasangroula9313 Před 2 lety +12

    Thank you for this beautiful episode

  • @lakshay7901
    @lakshay7901 Před rokem +46

    I think Arjun might be 45 years old when he fought the kurukshetra war. Coz that sounds reasonable as per calculations.
    Also one thing I wanna say that when she mentioned about the warriors who could defeat keechak, she missed duryodhan and Arjun.
    TV serials have distorted the image of ashvatthama, Abhimanyu, draupadi, shakuni.
    Ashvatthama was the only warrior to stalemate Arjun in the Virat war. Ashvatthama saved karna two times from Arjun in the kurukshetra war, otherwise karna would have died on 14th day itself.
    Satyaki defeated karna two times.
    Bheem defeated karna five times.
    Abhimanyu defeated karna once.
    But there's no doubt that karna was still one of the great warriors of that time.
    Had he not promised kunti, he could have killed nakul, sahadev and yudhishthir as well without any doubt in the war.
    Ashvatthama in the mid of war on 17th day, pleaded duryodhan to make peace with Pandavas and live happily thereafter.
    Ashvatthama on the night of 18th day killed nearly everybody in Pandavas camp which included Draupadi's sons. There's a misconception that they were asleep. That's false. Coz they were awake and fought ashvatthama till death.

    • @taruntac4347
      @taruntac4347 Před 11 měsíci +2

      When you listen to this person and then start getting brainwashed. Go and actually read it, Karna is not as weak as these people are calling him!

    • @taruntac4347
      @taruntac4347 Před 11 měsíci

      @@suparna5177 Yeah, and who didn't!

    • @haryana_aala_jaat20
      @haryana_aala_jaat20 Před 11 měsíci +1

      @@suparna5177 arjun was a very strong warrior physically also
      during the fight with mahadev , he uprooted a tree to throw it towards mahadev and threw heavy stones also

    • @haryana_aala_jaat20
      @haryana_aala_jaat20 Před 11 měsíci +3

      @@taruntac4347 but karn was also not as shown in serials

    • @aryanrishi8292
      @aryanrishi8292 Před 10 měsíci

      ​@@suparna5177arjuna can never be in physical fight ..archery he can for sure

  • @hrehaandixit
    @hrehaandixit Před 9 měsíci +1

    Great podcast. Must watch for everyone

  • @girishdubey1405
    @girishdubey1405 Před 2 lety +11

    मेरी सबसे बड़ी गलती यह है, आधा जीवन बीत गया, और मैंने शास्त्र ही नही पढ़े,
    पर अब मैं अपनी गलती सुधारना चाहता हूं।।

    • @RitwikRaghav
      @RitwikRaghav Před 2 lety +3

      व्यासरचित महाभारत पढ़ लीजिए। उसे पांचवा वेद कहा गया है। और कलियुग में महाभारत जीवन जीना सिखाता है।

  • @ahpala
    @ahpala Před 2 lety +69

    Very insightful for some who wish could learn Sanskrit. Ami ji has thoroughly researched Mahabharat … and very good coverage of different questions too. Thank you both 🙏🏽

    • @crypton_8l87
      @crypton_8l87 Před 2 lety +1

      Of course you can learn too! Do look up The Sanskrit Channel here on CZcams.
      Other sources for learning is Sanskrit Bharathi, and govt Sanskrit Colleges in many states.

    • @abhimannukumarsingh8068
      @abhimannukumarsingh8068 Před 2 lety

      There are some wrong information in this debate regarding meat eating. There is no meat eating in Mahabharata and Ramayan. Do read sanskrit to hindi translation there is a word in Sanskrit called Maasam, that means fruits inside part....there is no mention of meat or fish at all. All these English translation done by Max Muller and his companions. There are 46 letters in Sanskrit and 26 letters in English. How can someone translate Sanskrit in English. Ye sab Kiya gya sirf hinduon ko badnaam krne ke liye 😡😡😡

    • @ayansharma4373
      @ayansharma4373 Před 6 měsíci

      @@abhimannukumarsingh8068 Very true Prabhu Ji

  • @jyotitiwari4298
    @jyotitiwari4298 Před 8 měsíci

    What a insight knowledge about Mahabharata and I got to know so much about our real history rather than serials and other sources..what a lady with so good naration..and about Karn character I was always so confused about this character from TV serials and it was all mixed now I got a better info and surely will read real source too👏👏👏

  • @mangeshmehendale9220
    @mangeshmehendale9220 Před rokem

    खुप खुप धन्यवाद.. अतिशय सुंदर अभ्यास आहे.. आज काल महाभारताची इतकी वाट लावत आहेत TV सीरियल वाले आणि कादंबरी लेखक..
    अशावेळी अशा अभ्यास पूर्ण पुस्तकाची व संवादाची गरज आहे.. कर्णाच्या नावाखाली जातीच इतकं राजकारण केले जात आहे हे लोकांना जितकं लवकर कळेल तितकं बरं होइल...

  • @nrusimha11
    @nrusimha11 Před 2 lety +86

    Wonderful conversation. Ami's analysis of Karna's character agrees with what I heard many other scholars of the Mahabharata say.

    • @footjn532
      @footjn532 Před 2 lety

      @ProDoge he was kutni putra.

    • @nrusimha11
      @nrusimha11 Před 2 lety +6

      @ProDoge Assuming it is true, that would say that he was technically proficient in fighting. It says nothing about him being a role model for dharma.

    • @deepush316
      @deepush316 Před 2 lety +7

      @ProDoge har baar bhag jaata karna arjun se bachke 40 to chodo .004 baar bhi nahi haraya

    • @deepush316
      @deepush316 Před 2 lety +4

      @ProDoge mb ka sabse bada fraud tha karna

    • @deepush316
      @deepush316 Před 2 lety +3

      @ProDoge koi logic nahi kuch bhi bolna hai.

  • @sochopakstan4452
    @sochopakstan4452 Před 2 lety +3

    i m sikh… but dil se bolta hon ke apka program itna jiada acha laga jisko btana mushkil hai… or bachpan mein ramayan… mahabharat… ko full week wait kiya jata or usme ayse kho jate rahe ke jab program khatam ho jata to ekdum se time mein wapis aate or dukhi sa ho jate ke kyun khatam ho gya.. or india ke har ghar mein total family dekhti thi or ayse hi intezar karti thi… or ramayan to hamare balmiki bhaiyon ki demand pe jidhar end kiya uske aage se dubara start kiya… thanks admin & guest…

  • @abhishek894
    @abhishek894 Před rokem

    Fascinating discussion. Mahabharat has always a ultra magnetic attraction.

  • @shobhachamoli6136
    @shobhachamoli6136 Před rokem

    Thnx to you tube....thnx for providing such a beautiful narrative.....