Knowing Rama With Ami Ganatra | Unraveling the Hidden Facets of Shri Rama
Vložit
- čas přidán 11. 06. 2024
- Welcome to our GRC Stories! In this exclusive interview, join us as we delve into the depths of understanding Shri Rama, one of the most revered figures in Hindu history, with the renowned author Ami Ganatra. Ami Ganatra, the author of the enlightening book "Ramayana Unravelled," shares invaluable insights into the multifaceted persona of Shri Rama, shedding light on some of the most enigmatic aspects of his life and decisions.
Throughout the interview, we explore the intricacies of Shri Rama's character, seeking to comprehend the rationale behind some of his most controversial actions, such as the heart-wrenching decision to abandon Sita and the sacrifices he made in pursuit of fulfilling his father's wishes. Ami Ganatra's profound analysis offers a fresh perspective on these timeless narratives, allowing us to gain a deeper understanding of Shri Rama's motivations and the moral complexities inherent in his journey.
One of the key highlights of the discussion is the exploration of Shri Rama's relationships with those around him, including his devoted brother Lakshmana, his loyal devotee Hanuman, and his dutiful brother Bharat. Through these intricate interpersonal dynamics, Ami Ganatra unravels the layers of Shri Rama's character, showcasing his unwavering commitment to dharma and the profound impact of his actions on those closest to him.
This interview stands out as a rare opportunity to engage with the deeper dimensions of Shri Rama's persona, offering viewers a unique perspective on his timeless teachings and their relevance in contemporary times. By delving into the complexities of Shri Rama's life and decisions, we are not only enriched with spiritual wisdom but also empowered to navigate the challenges of our own lives with greater clarity and insight.
Join us on this enlightening journey of self-discovery and spiritual exploration as we uncover the hidden facets of Shri Rama's divine persona with Ami Ganatra. Because, as Ami beautifully articulates, the more we understand Shri Rama, the better we become as individuals, fostering compassion, empathy, and wisdom in our hearts and minds.
Don't miss out on this transformative conversation! Hit the play button and embark on a journey of discovery with us. Like, share, and subscribe to our channel for more insightful content that inspires, educates, and uplifts. Thank you for joining us!
00:00 - RECAP
01:13 - Introduction
01:13 - Connection Of Ami Ganatra With Sri ram
07:25 - Relations Of Sri Ram & How did Sri Ram go for "Vanvas"
13:55 - Statement of Ram for Bharat during Vanvas
18:30 - Relation Of Ram & Lakshman
24:40 - Surpnakha wanted to marry Ram
28:50 - How Sri Ram & Sri Krishna both are similar
29:15 - Love story of Sri Ram & Sita Ji
50:25 - Why Sri Ram did not ask his self to Sita Ji to come Vanvas with him
59:45 - Sita Ji's Agni Pariksha
1:11:50 - If Sita Ji doesn't go through the "Agni Pariksha" then how could be the story - Zábava
I could listen to Ami Ganatra Ma"am all day❤ She explains so nicely! Please bring here again on ur show..want to know more Lord Rama ,The Ramayana and Krishna in depth ❤
Next episode on our krishna
I have listened to Ami ji for the first time and she has explained very well. She has answered all the questions so beautifully. Thanks for this interview 🙏. Jai Sri Ram
Saty ko janne ke liye Maine valmikiy Ramayan ko bahut bar padkar Ramcharit ,Saket ,vaidehi Vilas ,Kasmiri ramavatatar ki study ki । Sri Ram ko isa kyon karna pada ।mujhe sab samajh aya but sbhi ko kaise bataya jae unki mahanta ko ।apka ye step bahut hi sarahniy hai ।mujhe bahut khusi Hui apko sunkar ।
Dhanyawad... aap apni taraf se bhi logon ko samjhaen.
Absolutely right mam I proud of you me 5/6baar ramayan dekh cuka hu but sach me Shri Ram or Sita ji or ramayan ko bahut accha se samajh me aaya ❤❤❤❤❤
Beautifully Explained!! 🙏👌
Proud of you ma’am. I love watching your shows any number of times. We are also learning the original version in Sanskrit
Makes a lot of understanding after listening to you. In fact now we have started looking for these info while learning
Thanks a lot
It was injustice to Mata Koushalya and Mata Sumitra. Exellent analysis on Ramayana 👌👌👌please arrange more and more episodes on Ramayan and Mahabharat. And a special on Droupadiji. Many misunderstandings about her.
Thank you for the comment and appreciation. We are glad that the analysis will clear misunderstandings about SiyaRam
Every read of रामायण and महाभारत is new experience. Ami makes it worth reading again and again ❤
Amazing
Ami ji with your studies and lots of hard work you explained to us the real nature and real intentions of characters of our great epics.we are extremely grateful to you. The way you are talking about these characters shows your deep love for them. I pray to God that you always be in such a state of mesmerizing love for heroes and heroines of these epics and explain to us their motives behind their actions and strategies 🎉🎉❤❤
Maturity is when you realize that Ramji was right decision maker... He was like soldier who prioritize country over his family.... Praja na bigad jaye, unka vishwas kayam rahe isliye unhone priy patni Sita ma ka tyag kiya par mann se hamesha pyar karte rahe... Ravan ko marne ke baad vishwavijayi the vo ,kitne raja unhe apni beti dena chahte the, yagya ke samay to kitna bada chance tha unke pas dusra vivah karne ka phir bhi nahi kiya, koi samanya manav aisa akele patni ke sirf yadon me, bina kisi sansarik sukh ke rah sakta hai Kya, bina soche samjhe unko dosh dene Wale is baat pr dhyan de
Badi baat. Gehri baat.
Jai Sri Ram❤️
She has cleared many of our doubts
आपने बहोत अच्छेसे समझाया 🙏 धन्यवाद
Sita par agnipareeksha ke baad bhi lanchhan lage, ve jaanti thi ki shapath lene ke baad bhi log chup nahin rahenge. Unhone sahi nirnay liya aur nari ke samman ko banae rakha.
She is excellent 🙏
Excellent discussion
जय श्री राम ! ! !
रामायण और महाभारत पर आपका अध्ययन बहोत गहाण है । मुझे बहोत अच्छा लगा ।
मेरा सवाल है की , आप इस महाकाव्य को कैसे देखते है ? अध्यात्मक की इतिहास की दृष्टी से ?
What Sita Sita. She is our Devi maa. Give respect.
Bro asked the right questions and Ami ji you are a treat to watch an listen so much knowledge
नमस्ते अमीजी 🙏 आपका रामायण महाभारत पर विचार सुनकर बहुत ही अच्छा लगा. आप कभी स्वाध्याय परिवार के श्री परमपूजनीय पांडुरंग शास्त्री आठवले जी का व्यास विचार और वाल्मिकी रामायण यह वांग्मय पडेंगे तो आपका दृष्टिकोन और भी प्रगल्भ होगा अच्छा हो जायेगा. आपका अध्ययन अभ्यास बहुत ही गहरा गहन है. ये मेरी सिर्फ आपको नम्र बिनंती है
Geetanjali pawar ji aap ek baar Inka explaintion bhi sune czcams.com/video/PkFvRkuP2wQ/video.htmlsi=dtE9NCHtCTCHmYR-
Pls radha ke bhagwat main role par bhi vedio banaye
Ami ji is great .
Well explained
Thanks for explaining
Jai Siya Ram ji ki
Bahut bahut dhanyawad didi
Jai shree Ram nice podcast 👍
Probably one of the best explanations ever… Jai shree Ram Jai Mata sita
Is sitas kitchen dated scientifically >
Is it that many years old ?
Dhanya hain aap ke mata pita
🦚❤ HareKrishn💙🦚 Ami Ganatra ji
🙏💐जय सिया राम मैम कृतघ्न नहीँ,कृतज्ञ
The best Didi.
जय श्री राम जय सियाराम
Also want a podcast on Mahabharata with Ami Ganatra ma'am ❤
Very soon.
@@grcstories Thanks.🙂 Waiting for that
Such an amazing podcast... More and more people should watch it😊
आप जो बोल रहे हों मैम वही पढ़ रही हु मैं वाल्मिकी रामायण में । बाल काण्ड पढ लिया अब अयोध्या काण्ड पढ रही हु ।आप ही की तरह मुझे भी अग्नि परीक्षा नहीं पची और राम जी को जानने के लिए रामायण पढ़ रही हु ।आपको इतना याद कैसे रह जाता है वो आश्चर्य है मेरे लिए । लक्ष्मण जी ने परशुराम जी से कोई गुस्से में कुछ नही कहा सीता विवाह के समय वो भी वाल्मिकी रामायण में बताया है सच में रामायण पढ़े बिना आप राम जी या रामायण की वास्तविकता नहीं जान सकते
Jai Shri Ram anjali ji... aapko aapke prashno ke Uttar mil jaenge.
@@grcstories हा इसलिए ही पढ़ रही हु और इतना लगाव हो जाता है पढ़ते पढ़ते रामायण कि एक बार में ही सारे कांड पढ़ लूं । राम जी रामानंद सागर जी की रामायण से विपरीत है वाल्मिकी रामायण में ,राम मय हो जाए ऐसी अद्भुत है रामायण । उत्तर कांड कल्पना है पर अगर पढ़े तो उत्तर काण्ड किस लेखक का पढ़े ? बताइएगा । क्योंकि वाल्मिकी जी ने तो उत्तर काण्ड लिखा ही नहीं था ।
Uttar kand kalapnik hai prabhu shree Ram ji ne kabhi Mata Sita ka tag Kiya hi nhi sab zoot hai shree Ram ko Street virodhi banane ki koshish ki gai hai....
Dear friend ,
I have few doubts.
1.Can u tell me at what age the couple got married??
Some say he was 19 and she was 16.Some mention that she was 6 ( which was absurd),others say that he was 25 and she was more than 16.
2.They spent few years happily in Ayodhya before the exile.Has Valmiki Ji given any description of them not having children at that time?
3.What about the time they were in exile? They spent 13 blissful years together in utmost happiness.Surely they weren't sleeping on silken sheets ,magnificent beds and all but they were quite happy in the beautiful forest..Ram being the emotionally expressive person that he was even goes on saying that he can live with her for ever in the jungle .He further adds multiple times during the course of 13 years that he doesn't even want Swarga without her.I hope I'm not being offensive when I can say cautiously it was their honeymoon of 13 years.Sita was extremely happy because she has Shri Ram all to herself which was otherwise not possible had they had been in palace with him being King and sincerely discharging his duties( an extremely difficult job) that needs him all his time with having next to none moments for them together .
So did they practise celibacy in Valmiki Ramayana ? Because in Ramcharitmanas ,they were asked by Kaikeyi to strictly adhere to celibacy so as not to have another heir to the kingdom.
If they did have a conventional married life in vanvas ,any description of the reason not having a child?Or because of the circumstances ,they refrained from having a child consciously because even garbhadharana for the kings were elaborate rituals for that times ?Also practical reasons for them include not being economically strong,lack of safety in jungle and difficult circumstances to bring up a child ..Any passing info on them in Valmiki Ramayana about their status in Vanvas willbe helpful.
If we believe in Uttar kaand ,they return and immediately the 4 princesses conceive shortly afterwards.
Hope u will be patient enough to answer my queries..🙏
We will answer your questions.
Ami ji Blessed ho aap so are we pranams
Ami Ganatra 🔥
में श्रीमद भागवत पुराण मेरी गुरु माता से सुन रही हु और अभी दशम स्कंध का रसलीलावाला अध्याय चल रहा है
Am a big fan of your’s mam. Hatt’s off to you 🫡
क्योंकि जो आरोप उन पर लगना प्रारंभ हुआ था उसके पश्चात माता सीता जीवित ही नहीं रहती। आज यह जो प्रश्न उठ रहा है यही भगवान राम के कार्य की सार्थकता है। राजा के दायित्व और एक व्यक्ति के दायित्व में अंतर रहता है।
Convents schools in India are teaching kids that Ramayan never happened and it is a myth hence mythology. Please make an episode for people to understand that it is not myth. A friend of mine was arguing with me to the extent of saying , invention of wheel baad may hua to Rath kaha se aaya. I put forward my points but she was not interested in listening. Please make a podcast where these types of misunderstandings are made clear.
Jay shree ram❤️🙏Jay shree ram❤️🙏🙏Jay shree ram❤️🙏Jay shree ram❤️🙏🙏Jay shree ram❤️🙏🙏
Jai Jai Shri Ram....
Ask her about Nabakalebara festival of orissa where Brahm Padarth exchanged in Jagannath Idol.
बुद्ध अपने पत्नी, बच्चोको छोड़ के निकाल गए।
ना उत्तम राजा बन पाए, ना उत्तम पती!!!!!!!
आत्म ज्ञानी तो भगवान राम भी हैं!!!!!!!!!
बुद्ध से कई गुना श्रेष्ठ हैं
*श्री* *राम*
Thank you so much sir for this wonderful video,
Please do interview of ami ganathra ji on the topic of krishna,
Now a days its only gossips about krishna, so ask question detail about raasaleela, and his wife and other intereting topics, and topics which are completely gossip about krishna like raasa leela etc
Thank you
Very soon. Your request will soon be fulfilled.
Thank you
Kisi bhi mahanayak pr Ram ji jaisa vakt na aye ki apne priy patni ko tyagna pade...praja na bigde isliye kitna bada tyag karna pada unko...Ram ji ko dosh dena bahot asan hai....sahi samajna bahut mushkil
सब होता है, समय के साथ,
मेम एक बार आप नरेंद्र कोहली द्वारा रचित अभ्युदय पढ़िए।
In our puranas there is one story, Bhrugu Rishi gave curse to Lord Vishnu, When Vishnu kills Bhrugu's wife by Sudarshan Chakra. That curse was " Vishnu also will have to suffer separation from his wife." Lord Vishnu accept that curse for his act. That curse was completed in Ramayana, by separation.
Yes.
This curse is also mentioned in Uttara Kanda.
Aapki vidwata ko naman
You should have add the Hashtags on this video. Podcast should reach to max
We will add.
Jai shree ram ❤
Jai Jai Shree Ram.
Please have English subtitles as there are Indians watching outside India.
Sure. We will add it.
मैं वाल्मीकि रामायण पढ़ रही हूं इसीलिए यह सब बातें अच्छी तरह समझ रही हूं अभी मैं किष्किंधा कांड पर हूं मुझे भी राम के चरित्र को अच्छी तरह जानना है और असल में रामायण में क्या लिखा है वो भी जानना है धन्यवाद
Dear friend ,
I have few doubts.
1.Can u tell me at what age the couple got married??
Some say he was 19 and she was 16.Some mention that she was 6 ( which was absurd),others say that he was 25 and she was more than 16.
2.They spent few years happily in Ayodhya before the exile.Has Valmiki Ji given any description of them not having children at that time?
3.What about the time they were in exile? They spent 13 blissful years together in utmost happiness.Surely they weren't sleeping on silken sheets ,magnificent beds and all but they were quite happy in the beautiful forest..Ram being the emotionally expressive person that he was even goes on saying that he can live with her for ever in the jungle .He further adds multiple times during the course of 13 years that he doesn't even want Swarga without her.I hope I'm not being offensive when I can say cautiously it was their honeymoon of 13 years.Sita was extremely happy because she has Shri Ram all to herself which was otherwise not possible had they had been in palace with him being King and sincerely discharging his duties( an extremely difficult job) that needs him all his time with having next to none moments for them together .
So did they practise celibacy in Valmiki Ramayana ? Because in Ramcharitmanas ,they were asked by Kaikeyi to strictly adhere to celibacy so as not to have another heir to the kingdom.
If they did have a conventional married life in vanvas ,any description of the reason not having a child?Or because of the circumstances ,they refrained from having a child consciously because even garbhadharana for the kings were elaborate rituals for that times ?Also practical reasons for them include not being economically strong,lack of safety in jungle and difficult circumstances to bring up a child ..Any passing info on them in Valmiki Ramayana about their status in Vanvas willbe helpful.
If we believe in Uttar kaand ,they return and immediately the 4 princesses conceive shortly afterwards.
Hope u will be patient enough to answer my queries..🙏
Such a immature host,he doesn't knw how to quote the questions...
She explained everything so beautifully❤
I have a question.
I think sita ji ko ram ji chode nahi.
I think agar bhadra ye bol bhi raha tha ki sita ji par logon ko sandeh hai isliye sare log maryada bhool rahe hain toh ram ji ye baat logon ko kyun nahi batate ki sita agnipareeksha ho chuka hai.
Again remember that krishna and satyabhama rescued more than 16000 princesses then Krishna married them all so that others might not say bad things about these princesses.
But why would ram ji leave sita ji after agni pariksha?
Ma'am please clear my doubts.
Your question is sent to Maam. Will send the revert soon.
Plz ek video Radha aur krishna pe bhi banae ...
Ram ne apne pita ko teen patniyo ke madhya pareshan hote dekha. Ve apne jiwan me kalah nahin chahte the isliye ek vivah kiya.
Kuch bhi... Seeta ma ke tyag Ke baad to Seeta ma saath me nahi rahti thi tab to dusra vivah kar sakte the... dono patniya saath nahi hoti to pisne ka saval hi nahi uthta... Ma seeta se prem karte the isliye ek patnivrat liya tha
Ek question ya bhi h ki Sita ko valmiki ashram Mai Jana sa ayodhya ki ladies na kue nhi roka woh kue Sita ka sath nhi khadi hui ager hoti toh assa nhi hota Sita ki situation k lia Mera hisaab sa waha ki ladies bhi jimadaar hai india ma suru sa he aurat khabhi ek dusra ka lia nhi khadi hui tbhi bhart ka ya haal ha ladies ka .
Sita ka parityag valmiki ramayan ke Anusar bina kisi se salaah mashwara kiye bagaer hua tha. Laxman ne shri ram ke kehne par yah mushkil Kary kiya tha.
Bawangan Ram Ki Jai
Mam aap ko dr.kumar visavas ko sunana chaiye
Dharm kewal yahi hai ki yadi praja murkh ho lekin raja ko vivek se chalna chahiye aur har insan ko nyay milna chahiye. Jab raja hi apni patni par atyachar kare to public ko to aur hari jhandi mil jayegi
2nd time unhe kyun bola wo samajh nhi aaya agnipariksh dene ko
Even after the first agnipariksha, the people of ayodhya still questioned and manipulated the character of maa sita. And it's because of the second agnipariksha(swearing by the name of mother earth) followed by her sacrifice of life made what sita maa is today. Symbol of purity, we hesitate answering the questions poised on Shri Ram's decision. But never ever anyone ever questioned Maa Sita after the second agnipariksha. Rama took it on himself by sacrificing his love forever in order to keep her sanctity pure and unquestioned.
@@grcstories thank you for your explanation but it's high time ram ji 2nd time agnipariksh keliye nahi bola na jahiye tha na but ok
what about the promise a husband say thing when they married each other .
That what she said, it about dharam sankat, a king oath is way bigger than a husband oath,
Tell me about soldier, they leave there family, wife, they also promise there wife, which oath is bigger, a soldier, or a husband, ofcoure a soldier.
Read about satyavadi raja harishchandra
Namaste mam main chahti hun ki jo aap you tube per bata Rahai ho use per movie banao jis se AJ ki jarnaion ko bhi ache se samajh aje ki baghvan per bolne se pehle apni girban main jakh lo
Agar droupadi ke haasy se kurukshetra hua,, to Sri Ram ke shoorpanakha ke saath ke haasy se Seeta ke kidnap hua....nimitt kehte hain jab ye ek murd ke prati hai.
What you are talking about, did you know shoorpanakha attack maa sita, she get punishment for, that, So bad log ke thinking ko, kisi or ko blame Kar do.
Kya seeta tyag ka prasang valmiki ramayam mein hain?
Ji, Uttar Kand ke naam se valmiki ramayan me ek aakhiri chapter hai. Parantu bohot se log isko prakshipt maante hain, yaani baad me add Kiya gaya hai.
@@grcstories haan wohi maine bhi suna hain ki ye prasang baad mein joda gaya hain, isiliye puncha ki sach mein ye seeta tyag prasang valmiki ramayan mein hain bhi ya nahi
कृतघ्न नहीं कृतज्ञ हूँ,
Kiske prati?
@@grcstories😂😂😂
Sahi pakde hen !
प्रजा रंजन करना राजा का कर्तव्य ।
Amiji:
Ram had to choose between Truth and Public Opinion. He opted for public opinion.
In terms of higher values or morality, it was a bad choice, a surrender.
The British philosopher Bertrand Russell once said that if he had to choose between truth and the destruction of humankind, he would choose truth.
It not only public opinion but there is also integrity and honor of raghu dynasty ..... That is also at stake... Read
original ramayan please.
What u will do with truth. when humanity is destroyed.. Truth is supposed to give sustainability to humanity..
Very well said.. it's not between truth and public opinion. It's about setting the righteousness....
I think we have to agree to disagree on this point.
Ram's conduct towards Sita at various points in the narrative
does not show him in great light. See how he confronts Sita after vanquishing Ravan.
Some of his utterances are almost offensive. The agni pareeksha, his surrender to public gossip, his exiling pregnant Sita -- a noble princess, the great Raja Janak's dsughter -- and his conditional acceptace of his wife in the end !
I wish Ram had the wisdom to realise that his victory over Ravan was ensured by Sita's purity. Ram would have lost the war if Sita had deviated from her dharma.
What a divine incarnation he was!
@@sarvan58 well it is truth that there is no prove of uttar ramayan written by valimiki ji, add much latter,
Because in ram chritamanas written by tulsidas there is no mention of uttar ramayan,
In mahabharata when ramayan was narrate Yudhistira by Markandeya it doesn't have uttar part,
Well that point of ramayan or mahabharata it never about showing in great light, it what must need to be done for the betterment.
Yes that harass word he said, but the one who read ramayan, all incident that happened early before rescue maaa sita, will know that it is suddenly change in his word, well do you know even maaa sita says harass word to laxma at time of laxma Rekha,
Before incident when maaa sita was abducted, lord ram become madman, he ask plants, tree,rivers, mountain, birds, animal where his sita, he was weeping, when he got no answer, he is so angry that he tell he will distory this world, Lakshman make him sant,
He was crying time to time all written, his condition Hanuman ji says to maa sita, what lord ram is said to maaa sita, or what he did is different, if it was for Raj kul, why sending Hanuman there,
Third incident when Meghnath unable to win over lord ram, that make Maya sita, cut her head infront lord ram, he was all most faited, latter know that not his sita.
Going this length, wining war, almost loosing his brother, injured, is enough prove.
Froth is not agni parikasha is agni pravesh, so let get back again when in lanka Hanuman met ravan after this they burn Hanuman ji tail and maaa sita when she heard she order agni dev don't let burn Hanuman ji,
In agni pravesh this is not first time she connect with fire god, agni dev,
So not only lord ram but maaa sita also going to be queen,though word. Make maaa to do agni pravesh.
Even Before maaa sita all interaction of lord ram with other women ahilaya, tarka, Sabri, lord ram giving respect, to them, or make accepted by to society.
So lord ram right even maa sita done agni pravesh, still this Praja not accepting her, as queen.
@@sarvan58 well what is meaning of surrender, so tell me can anybody get punishment for gossip, ok if he can, too whom one person, or two, whoever Said shit, is this solve problem, or bring respect for someone, aag Mai oil Dalne ki baat hai.
Second he can ignore all this gossip, but, latter one year after when lav kuch born will this so called Praja accept them, when gossip circulate to much, people accepted as truth, latter when truth is tell people do not believe in that, it human nature,
Ask for agni pravesh again, which he never wanted, maaa sita is pregnant.
He can leave from king position, but will this Praja, accept other king, who will sit, bharat laxman, Nobody, than this Praja blame maaa sita.
Last option sapration lord ram or maa sita, lord only sapration from maa sita, no but from with son also he was going to be father, oath of king is bigger than husband or father.
Laxma left maa sita near valimiki asram, well lord ram can send maaa sita too her home janakpur, but this not right option, asram is safe place way from all gossip,
We judge ramayan this today perspective, in this grey world which totally different that time, all.
Last condition again it was not for lord ram, this time is about lav kuch, as are going to be next king.
Yes this time maaa sita choice her self respect, the way, lav kuch accept by Praja,
Her last wish that she wanted to be his wife in every birth.
When they where saparated, many people or Raj sabha, suggest or king offer marriage proposal to lord raam but he is only husband of sita,
Well not only it very important for king to give offspring to throne.
Let me tell many law of today over constitution of our country come from ram law, ahinsa which we use at time of British Raj, come from, ram rajaya
Seriously you talking about wisdom, well lord, ram never ignore what he have done, either killing bali, or kill ravan who was braman, or incident with maaa sita, his life, he accept with full arm, go first read about ram rajaya than talk about wisdom, well ramayan or ram Leela is for wisdom. His life is fill with full of wisdom,
It is very true that it very easy to blame lord ram, but very difficult to be him,
Ravan Vardan was no one kill him, only human he don't take name, so lord 7 avtar of lord Vishnu is human, lord ram never use his complete power,fight with gyan, Astra gain in knowledge. Like krishna has shown Sudarshan chakar many time in mahabharata, but valimiki ramayan he was more human.
Logon to aur pap lagna chahiye..... Itna kasht sahna pda mata Sita ko😢
In spite of having studied Sanskrit I am sad you pronounced "Kritaghn".but later you pronounce it right,? why
Apologies can be considered. Slip of tongue bhi ho sakta hai.
Amiji apne galti se Kritagnh kaha Jo ki aap Kritagya kahna chahti hain😂
Are you 'kritaghna' hi ha'kritagya' nahi...
Kritagya=jo upkari ko upkar kare....
Kritaghna=jo upkari ko bhul Jaye...
So it was kritaghna
RAMJI Ne SITA MATA KA TYag KABi B NAHI KIYA THA.. .......BHut BADi MILAVAT HaMARE SHATRO MAI.........SATYA. jANo.......
Kritaghna nehi,kritagya hu
Praja ko samjana chom
वाल्मिकी रामायण ही सही है बाकी मे मन गढन्त कहनिया घुसेडी है
Hello billions people
There is no agniparishka or washerman story
Yes sitamata and shriram were mutually separated for a partial time that too for bhrigu maharshi curse and they want to raise their kids in forest to teach them meditation and nature importance Lord ram is lord vishnu
And madevi lakshmi is adilakshmi
She too killed ravan thats true
She went into ravan dreams and killed him from i mean learn kundalini shakthi first everyone in the youtube are coming and telling the fake story which is created by 3rd person
Valmki maharshi clearly mentioned why they are separated they want to raise their kids at forest thatsall
And they used to meet each other at forest
Lord ram and ayodhya people love shriram and sitamata
After ravan death both sitamata and shriram are routed in their lower chakras
First learn what si chakras
Agniparishka is a follow story to destroy the glory of sitamata
Shriram and sitamata are one
You people create fake stories and you argue about it
If shiva is great kalimata is also great
If lord ram is great and sitamata is also great
My dear foolish spiritual speakers
My dear atheists
My dear feminists
My dear Spirtual children who learn ramayan by watching movies or serials learning the main key points like Agniparishka, sitamata scolding lakshman prabhu, washerman story
Some people claim uttatkand is there
Without uttatkand there are no luv kush
Hello masters luv kush are there both shriram and sita mata wants to raise their children in forest they used to meet each other
So don't tell Agniparishka or washerman story is a divine act
The original valmki ramayan has changed
Even valmiki maharshi soul felt sad after hearing the Agniparishka story clearly
He again reincarnated as tulsidas maharshi his ramayan is closer to the original version but nit completely closer
Agnicame from sitamata to destroy the negative energies in lanka which is created by ravan
Ravan never touched mata is fake
Ravan touched and harrased mata is fake
When ravan touched mata wrist fire came out of her body she said with my own will I'm coming to destroy you
Thats all
Ayodhya people used to do pooja fro mata
Because they sitamata rani so much
Mata parvati helped her
Many female yogins helped her
Ayodhya
Seeradwaja janak maharaja raised and thought meditation
From her childhood only
She was in meditation from 9 months continously
She thought many lessons to mandodari etc
If valmiki maharshi comes and tell that my ramayan has changed
People :no this is original uttatkand happened Without uttatkand there are no luv and kush
:Ram and sita we both mutually separated
For a divine reason to raise our kids in forest instead of kingdom we chosen forest and the importance of nature
People:no no no washerman story is true
Ram wants to take all the rumours regarding sitamata thatswhy ram sent sitamata away
Ram and sita mata: no one judge me or called apavitra
When ravan captured me
Maybe in lanka humans nature is gossiping
So 1 to 2 memebers ill about me because When lord ram killed then only people thought ravan is bad upto them they used to treat him as a great king
I read the untold story of sita mata book by dena merriam mam dena merriam is servant of sitamata
The love between sitamata and shriram is ireecplacable
Lord ram promised too pralay can't separate us
How can washerman separated
When you go to tirupati we all venkesthwara swami right
And padmaavati mata
I want to be in tirupati for lifelong
Because they are divine
At that its tretayuga Atleast they have food nature
They don't judge people like us kaliyuga
Judging women by their appearance
Some people support Agniparishka and tell
That's the greatness of lordram
Hello master sitamata and shriram why he do agniparishka When both are united in their lower chakras
Basically we kaliyuga people will judge women
Whatever media speaks ill about women we believe That's our mindest not lord ram mindset they both are one
In kaliyuga the original version of valmiki ramayan has changed with expanding new concepts Because
If godess like her would sent away from home a common man can also sent her wife away
I'm chanting lord ram name continously to know the organal ramayan
When I went to tirupati ord venkesthwara swami blessed me I felt his love That's
I'm feeling sad because people who are feminists or atheists or spiritual learners ir whoever may be
They are influenced by a fake concept
The original valmki ramayan is Amazing
Sita mata sacrificed her life to lakshman When lord yama wants to take his life
This is true
Jai Siya Ram.... aapki samajh Sar aankhon par..
Seb apni apni bhasa bolte h Dr. Kumar Vishwas ji isko jhooth betate h to hume ykeen nhi jinhe daut h vo unko bhi sune....Sita maa k tyagne ka visya ko....
Why calling Ramayan and Mahabharat mythology and u have book by name mythology storyteller
Phc tkusle dhgilh. Su. Da
Llllll
Uttar kand kalapnik hai prabhu shree Ram ji ne kabhi Mata Sita ka tag Kiya hi nhi sab zoot hai shree Ram ko Street virodhi banane ki koshish ki gai hai....
Us say to Qaid a azam bahtar thay .jinhon na shahab ko danta tha k un k sath kaam keya or ab unki mukhbri mujay batatay ho nikal jao yahan say .
Uttarkandki kahani ramayanme nahihai.valmiki ya tulsikrut ramayame nahi hai. To ispar charcha kyu?
The Ramayana series should be ashamed spreading lies to make profit money 💰
I am glad I didn't study at IIM Ahmedabad
because if my sense of justice remains so biased even after so much higher education and exposure to the world, i would be ashamed of my existence.
Ami Ganatra, like every proud and biased hindu you are also biased to Shri Ram who had no sense of justice as a king.
He did not follow Raj Dharma by punishing innocent Sitaji.
He in fact started a trend of punishing innocent ( Sitaji and some others as well ) and forgiving the wicked ( Kaikeyi)
He was a self obsessed person who just wanted praise of others.
He didn't have his own mind but always followed whatever Rishi Muni said. And like today all Brahmins are not nice even in that time all Rushi Muni were not nice.
They made him kill innocent people. And like a robot he did it without giving any thought.
Lord Krishna was compassionate and just to women and poor people with no power. But Shri Ram was a ruthless ruler who followed what he was instructed to make a powerful empire.
You need to study Valmiki Ramayan again with no bias.
I wish the Same .....If Ramji could have shut up the idiotic people and would not have left Sitaji ,probably a great ramrajya could have been established with Sitamaata beside him ..The Devi Sita who was the reason for killing of ravan nd demons,who was the establisher of dharma ,who was the reason behind establishing virtues over vices ,she was left just because of some rumors and shitty mouths ....It's simply easy way to virtuous women suppression and letting injustice ,and other sorts of voices and idiotic noises soar around the air ...Kuchh to log kahenge ,logon ka kaam hai kehna ...aur ek raaja ko to aur bhi kehte hain ,raajdharm nibhane wali Sitadevi ko to intolerable criticisms ...
If Sita ji had not been left by lord Ram ,if the rumors and illslcriticisms could have been ignored by ram ji ,probably now history could have been better ,the present days have been the great ...There might not have been cases of women suppression ,oppression ...And women need not be learned nd empowered ,they could be Empowered since birth ....
Democracy mein har kisi ki baat Sunni chhaiye ,lekin har kisi ke baat ko dil dimaag per lekar implement nahi karni chahiye ....kutark ,bitark ,apwaah failane wale ,aag lagane wale ,desh todne wale ,Ayodhya todne wale tabhi bahat the ,Aaj bhi bahat hain.aur har yug mein ese log bahat milenge.....Ram ji agar ese karte to har yug mein ramrajya hi hoti ,ese apwaah failane walein ko sirf punishment milna zaroori tha ...
It was a mythological mistake ,probably for which women are suppressed till now (in reference to virtuous ,righteous women ) .