Apollo 14 in 24fps: Landing, Moonwalk & Liftoff
Vložit
- čas přidán 27. 04. 2020
- Support content like this and more at my Patreon: / dutchsteammachine
Join the Discord Server and chat with like-minded people: / discord
Contact: apollo16uvc@gmail.com
Apollo 14 16mm taken during moon landing, EVA, Moonwalk and liftoff, interpolated from 12 to 24fps for your viewing experience. Synchronized with NASA & BBC audio.
16mm raw film: NASA
Audio: AFJ, Austin1987VCR, lunarmodule5
Processing: Dutchsteammachine - Věda a technologie
Talk about the arc of a lifetime. Ed Mitchell was once a working cowboy in New Mexico back in the 1940's. Picturing him sitting around a campfire with some older cowboys who rode back when it was still the Wild West. None of them could have imagined that the young buck in their midst would one day, just some 30 odd years later, be walking on moon that shone above them.
how crazy is that?
Thanks for reminding how time can change life for good.
💯
He would have been about 15.
@@aemrt5745 My grandmother was born in 1888. She used to say that the hilight of her life was the invention of the movies and Charlie Chaplin in particular. The low point was losing two of her four brothers in WW1. She acknowledged the technical advances that you mention but they were generally too far removed from her everyday life to be very relevant.
Imagine being one of these guys and looking back at the earth and saying “wow I’m on the damn moon.”
"You seen one Earth, you seen 'em all!" -- Jack Schmitt, Apollo 17
@@EriPages Lunar landings were replicated five more times; and the first attempt was very nearly a failure. Also, there were four manned test missions prior to the Apollo 11 landing and many more unmanned ones. You have no idea what you're talking about.
@@EriPages indeed this happened in 1971
@@EriPages I don't even wanna waste my time trying to explain you some basic science... plus I will never never never believe you or whoever's gonna tell the moon landings are fake, you can tell whatever you want, I know the truth, you don't
@@EriPages You're talking in riddles. There's no such word as"REALER". Go away and educate yourself.
We only have ever seen these events in non-HD video and audio, but imagine actually being there, looking through human eyes, with real color.
@Juicewrld999 Of course it is - there is no atmosphere and thus no wind up there to make it flutter.
There is a horizontal rod attached to the flag pole to make the flag look good instead of just hanging downwards, but the flag is only moving when the astronauts are putting it up or when they touch it, as they move closely by it - and for some time afterwards, since there is no atmosphere there to dampen its oscillations, only inner friction in the pole + rod + flag system.
@Juicewrld999 Actually it wasn't - and it was probably blown over during take off by the high velocity exhaust gasses from the ascent module in the A11 case.
No it wasn't just 5 ft away, but more like 15 - 20 or so.
Anyway the two astronauts had a bit of trouble putting the flag pole up, because it turned out that the lunar soil was pretty hard beneath the thick layer of lunar dust, which of course didn't help either.
So on (some of?) the later Apollo missions they would instead put up the flagpole a good bit further away from the LM, and secure the flag pole much better by drilling a hole for it in the hard lunar soil.
And these later flag poles with the US flag flying from them still seem to be standing after all these years ( you can see their shadows ), when you look at the "close up" photos ( from a height of 20 - 25 km ) that were taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LOR) that were taken of all 6 Apollo landing sites, when NASA shortly sent the LOR into a more elliptical orbit that allowed it to pass directly over them at relatively low altitudes.
@Bjowolf2 don't waste your brain on these retards. They have no life or purpose. They have to keep themselves busy by questioning the evidence of man's accomplishments and facts. Just ignore them.
@@JamieCrew Yes, you are right, but it's easy to get caught up in their web of ignorance and their lack of curiousity and ability to think for themselves 😉
Thank you 😊
@Juicewrld999 The lander is 31 feet wide (leg to leg). To be 5 feet away from the engine you'd have to be under it.
Not sure if I’d be filled more with absolute terror or wonder. Being on the moon, *Being* on the moon.
Wonder.
Even if you died there, you're doing something that only a handful of people have done.
Even if you die, you're dying in the midst badass way.
@@-Subtle- That’s totally true up until a point. Every diver that died diving was a hero until diving became common place. Every aviator that died flying made headlines until flying became common. The fear of being forgotten far outweighs the simple fear of death
@@MyLinguine No one remains remembered for eternity, but what matters is how are you different from the society.
hoax
@@mandrill173 Idiot.
This is why there were reports of massive episodes of depression from these astronauts for years after this mission. The high they must’ve experienced from
this mission, to experience that and then to come back to earth, never to leave again.
Or maybe they were forced to tell a lie
@@philippfinalizer
Reaching like all moon landing deniers
@@philippfinalizerhow dumb do you have to be…
@@GIJames I'm not convinced either way
The depression was living a lie the rest of their life with a gun pointed at them 24/7. Just look at the interview of buzz and niel afterwards.
And some kid reacting on another kid unboxing a happymeal gets millions of viewers. The moon seems a better place to be sometimes.
If that makes people happy, who are we to judge. Rather, we should be happy that there is also content for us out there.
the moon aint the kind kind of place to raise your kids. in fact its cold as hell, and then hot as hell, or something.
@@furadice973 Stand in the middle like a rotisserie chicken
@@furadice973 the song was about Mars, not the moon.
@@Nick-wn1xw Little boy blue and the man on mars.
Props to the camera man waiting for them to arrive
And which footage, exactly, do you think was taken by this mystery "camera man"?
@@Tim22222 the moon footage, the one that is on the video
@@nugs2727 it was one of the astronauts who had gotten out first, set up the camera, and recorded the second one getting out.
@@archierush868 No the cameraman waited for them to arrive
@@nugs2727which is more likely:
NASA sending another astronaut without telling anyone to already land on the moon but not have his Lunar Lander within view of the descent of the actual lander and only be there to record them getting out.
Or one of them got out first, set up a camera, and record the other getting out.
I watched every landing as a kid and was in total awe!!
I was one of millions who wanted to be an astronaut!!😊
It's amazing to think how much thrust it takes to escape the Earth, and how little it takes to escape the Moon.
That's gravity for you.
Keep in mind that the total mass of the Apollo at Canaveral liftoff was 6,200,000 pounds, while the lunar ascender weighed less than 11,000 pounds. That was the biggest difference.
Cgi studio shit 😂😂😂
@@rukawacloudstrife2114 Flat head bastard 💀
@@rukawacloudstrife2114 U dumb for real, man, CGI was primitive as hell up until the 80's when the industry finally started to hammer in and use it for entertainment and research
9:27 : me running back to check if I look stupid in the photo
Underrated comment
this is so good dud
LOL 😂
Lmfao
I hate when people tell me to smile right before a photo - that just feels _unnatural._ I prefer when they take spontaneous photos of random cheerful moments instead.
Imagine being there in person… gosh what a feeling… would be hard to grasp.
I can’t believe they’re not giggling and cheering the whole Time
I wouldn’t be professional enough for this at all
YES IMAGINE, BUT IT WAS A HOAX
@@tedcruzforgayrights2045
Why would you need to be professional? Professional for what?
You’d assume these people would show more emotion, it’s weird.
@@TripsX it’s most likely because they’re on a very strict time limit, they have a list of goals to take care of and in brand new territory like this you’d want to stay focused to the mission
Anything could happen
Also this is just a snippet
They spent a whole 21 hours on the moon, which I didn’t know until making this comment, so they probably had their moment at some point
@@TripsXSeriously? You can't see why it would be needed to be professional?
This is remarkable. Those landings were maybe the biggest human accomplishment in history. I love this stuff.
😂😂😂
fake af
So fake. As an engineer, the tech they had in the 60s wasnt anywhere close to landing on the moom and Taking back off, without any errors, on the first try...
@@toaster3822 I'll also point out that the earth is flat, which falsifies the moon landing on its own.
@@toaster3822 the first try? Are you aware of how many Apollo missions there were? Also, the Russians were watching this from both the inside and outside. If it was a fake, why didn’t they say anything? They would’ve known. There was a huge issue of prestige at play and they acknowledged the achievement.
" A little fast, not too bad..." Only landing on the moon. No big deal. They sure picked the right guys for the job.
Thinks it’s coined at NASA “the right stuff”. Brilliant.
7min though out🤔 tHE LINES THAT R HOLDN da ASStronauts UP🤪 VERY VISUAL 9:27🤬.... FAKEM👀N LANDn4$ho
@@edellis2960 Mwhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
@@edellis2960 you're stupid af
@@edellis2960 ya seriously you're a piece of shit, it would've been harder to fake the moon landing in 1969 than to just do it, and the astronauts left retroreflectors on the moon that are visible by telescope
I can't wait to see the Artemis 3 recorded images in HD when they will be back from the Moon on Earth with the future selected astronauts. It's gonna be life changing
yea!
Yet still the fake moon landing morons will be out in force.
9:56
😂
We can’t and have never went to space, this is fraudulent
Hollywood's special effects are so good, 50 years ago they made such a good movie
Sure. And the earth is flat as your brain. 😂
La bandera flamea
The more we learned about the usa as of today, we can pretty surely say this was hollywood movie and made for propaganda purpose :)
I know the moon is pretty small. But why does it look like the horizon is like 100 meters away?
How are you somehow able to tell it’s 100m away without any visual reference through a 2d screen?
The Horizon Is like 2,3km away buy without reference like mountains or hills it's hard to visualize it
Киностудия заканчивается
I cant wait for more lunar landing missions. Being able to see this is HD video will be incredible. The fact that this was done so many years ago with such little computational power is incredible. Much more focus on furthering the human race on a grand scale instead of worrying about cutting budgets
Maybe Artemis in 2025...
Now it will be much more of a cake walk. Since our last visits to the big space rock, we've sent probes and impacters to verious hard to reach places of the solar system. only issue is getting a safe enough system and suit to do the job with a larger margin of safety this time. We only have our own corperations to beat now.
Speaking of budgets, Arthur C Clark once said that everything you saw in the movie 2001 A Space Odessy could have been developed for the cost of the vietnam war
China is trying to land humans on the moon by 2030 and on mars by 2033 is what I've been hearing. There's still a race with foreign powers.@@dollin9515
we will never go back, shits fake asf
amazing. thanks for sharing. my words fail to describe the wonder of the cosmos unless i sit for a while and think
@yony artworks what does this mean? I think it's polish... jinkuyye (thank you) lol
Greta Thunberg - How dare you!
@Greta Thunberg Yes, and Earth is flat, and it was created six thousand years ago by the one and only sky lord.
@Greta Thunberg Ahh yes, the be all and end all of solid evidence. A fucking CZcams video, made for numpties like you to lap up because you're too desperately thick to be able to tell.
@Greta Thunberg I just went to the video in your link and "thumbs downed". I suggest everyone else do the same.
Thank you for upscaling it with AI, makes watching actually interesting.
Holy hell it's crazy how many people don't believe it. It's even funnier how some of them complain that the video quality is "too high to be true" xd. Do they even read what are they about to watch?
Easiest argument against the non-believers I've ever seen comes from Buzz Aldrin: "If you can disprove the math, you can disprove the landing"
@@dakunism how the f is simulated math any proof for u are u actually retarded or what??
Why hasn't this video been shown before?
@@dakunismmath, hmmmm. 1x1 is ? You see, easy
Indian moon mapping probe saw lots of unmanned landers on the surface, but when it came to the manned landing stuff they said ‘the resolution wasn’t good enough’. I think they really mean ‘nothing there!’
That's the wonderful thing about having recorded events like this with film instead of the primitive video technology of the time. You can digitize it in HD as see it as never before.
@@VolkerThimm the 10fps progressive scan valve based video cameras used for live broadcast.
@@jon_collins Not "valve" or vacuum tube based, except for the Epicon tube , which was a cross between a CRT and a silicon diode image matrix
There is tv footage from Apollo 17 EVA, many hours actually, that doesn't look too bad. Most people only seen the horrible (quality) one from Apollo 11.
czcams.com/video/vBSzlMjpBuM/video.html for example.
I heard that 11's EVA tv was filmed of a monitor in the tracking station and then send to the US for tv. It certainly looks like that in original recordings.
Funny how only the technology for the moon was better in 1969 than it is in 2021.
@Andre I know, its a joke, just like everything the government is telling us. They lied saying meat and butter and eggs were bad, now were finding out they're opposite.
I love how you can hear the long delay between the on-site communication and the echo of them receiving it.
Let's see the hoaxtards try and explain that.
Michael Clentworth i mean if I was a director making a movie about people going on the moon but shot in a studio, I would take in consideration the communication delay
@@fantin298 ya, these pseudo science moon landing must be stopped lol. they're even making fun of smart anti moon landing ew
OH NO! MY FOOT TRANSFORMED INTO A FOOT, WITH YOUR ASS WRAPED AROUND IT!
Rly, go back 2 4chan
Actually, I have longer delays than this using my cell phone calling my friends in The Rockies in 2021. ;-)
If you're an amateur radio operator, you can personally ping the repeater off of Apollo 12 Lander. Also, the Soviet Union and China were able to pick up the transmissions directly from the moon, If the landing was a fake The Soviet Union would be more than happy to expose their American rivals.
Unfortunately, the conspitards aren't radio amateurs, just regular amateurs.
@@ArKritz84 Amateurs? You think they have basic skills? Impossible, some of them claim Antartica is fake and say it’s impossible to go there when the only thing you need to do is fill out a short form and you can go. For the UK, it’s literally a single piece of paper, and tourism is a valid reason to why you can go there. You can’t call these guys amateurs when they cant fill out a single form which can be done in less than 5 minutes
Lies. And as for the USSR, they were run by the same people behind the scenes, the cold war was a psy-op designed to keep both populations living in fear, while at the same time allowing the 13 families who run the world to embezzle hundreds of billions of dollars from both sides.
You guys, are enemies of free, and autonomous thought.
What better are you, for the world?!
Attacking an entire group of people..(completely unprovoked, to boot.) For having a different point of view, about something.
And if your response is anything like, "it's all backed by science". You're just guilty of scientism.. And have no more of the playing field.. than people who don't think the same way. Which basically reduces you both, to bullies, and trolls.
Who, by the way, I was intrigued by, at first..
The radio stuff, I had never heard of before. But I am definitely, a moonlanding skeptic. it's too bad your comments digressed the way they did.
It's a shameful way to be a human being, you know..
God bless brave astronauts who flew deep into space, saw the entire sphere of the Earth, landed on the Moon and came back alive to tell us all about it. This footage is amazing from a different world that humanity has reached.
Lifting off the moon is the coolest part. The fraction of the effort to escape the moons gravity well is so small.
J Calhoun education for those morons is like red cape to a bull
@J Calhoun 🤣 enjoy
@@nikola.trafojer if you claim to know anything about physics... why are you mixing up mass and weight? Pssshhhhh....
@@nikola.trafojer Tbh thats not really the odd part. Jumping your vehicle into the 'air' and then activating thrust to escape the gravity isnt all that hard to do, hell you could do the same with fireworks on Earth, just throw it in the air right before lift off.
Moon escape velocity is 2.4 km/s. not sure that required effort is small.
This looks far more natural. 24 FPS is a sweet spot. Doesn’t even look interpolated if you hadn’t seen the original footage.
@@mariepiThere is no stars because the Moon is so bright, if you look up at the nightsky and look for the moon you can see how bright it is yet how dark it is in this Video, that's because they have to turn down the sensitivity of the Camera for it to not look like a white blinding mess.
@@mariepi Im tired of people like you. Stars are not visible cause the camera is recording a really bright surface, and the exposures time was fast, stars are dim, not giving the camera enough light to show up in the photos.
@@ok.6539 What an ignorant reply. It's quite possible the person has no knowledge of this, or could be a young person.
@@kevza1978 Maybe they should learn to educate themselves before implying it's fake then. Young people more than anyone should know how easily you can get information with a 2 second google search.
@@TwitchCronos100 he only said there was no stars and now we've educated him as to why there was no need for everyone to jump down his throat
It looks so fake it must be real.
Very grateful to be able to watch this, I was nine when this film was first taken. As an adult, I wonder at the lack of progress in developing habitats on the moon and elsewhere. I watched this video with adult eyes and saw the lunar surface through times different lenses, noticing mounds, projections and various anomalies I would never have considered as a young fellow. Thank you again it is every bit as awe inspiring but better, different.
Scientists then:
"Wow, we actually went to the moon and back!"
Scientists now:
"Ah for Fu** sake, the earth isn't flat!"
#SadTimes
9:59 #leaves on the moon.
@@whatisdoneinthedarkwillbeb9204 That's rocks you smooth brain
No humans went to mokn with that shitty technology lol the only spaceship wich will be able to sent people to moon and mars will be the starship of spacex..
Stop believing this fake story..
It wasnt nasa fault though goverment forced them to lie about this moon landing
@@ArjanTV the fuck kind of Olympic gold medal getting, world record-setting mental gymnastics has you convinced that only SpaceX will succeed in getting us to Moon and Mars, but NASA has faked the moon landing?
@@CommentCritic ikr like if elon was listing to this dude he'd slap the shit back into his ass and out his throat he'd be that pissed off imagine spending ur whole life as a astronaut and go to the moon witch is an amazing feat of ingenuity
My folks took me to the Cape for the launch of this mission. I still recon it as one of the high points of my life. 8 miles away, and we could feel the thunder of the liftoff through our feet as we watched. Followed the rest of the mission on TV, daily.
Thats very cool
Woah lucky i wish
@@jr9710 oh, so I guess all of the billions of other people who have an IQ above room temperature are also lying? That hundreds of years ago people like Galileo figure out the planet was round, hundreds of years later apparently it is flat again? Or at least to the small amount of people who apparently “know the truth”
@@quantumpotential7639 please shut up
But you had no clue it was only going to circle at lower Earth orbit and come right back. Then we were shown this footage from a Hollywood studio.
Absolutely amazing quality footage. Never seen this before
hoax
How to say you are scientifically illiterate without saying you are scientifically illiterate@@mandrill173
@@mandrill173prove it ret@rd
FAKE ASF
@mandrill173 You are proof that Crack babies can make it to adulthood. Albeit with a bit of brain damage.
Amazing, this happened before i was born. I hope i can watch another moonlanding live, i will be just inches away from the tv screen i can assure you.😊
I was in High School / Jr. High during the apollo missions and yes... it was and is still exciting to me. Can't wait for the Artemis missions... Ad Astra!
you guys been fooled big time@@JeffreyBue_imtxsmoke
I love watching footage from the apollo days. truly incredible
Fake. Because NASA lied.
USA lied .
They all lied .......they never went !
@@Motleymick lying works only for things that cannot be objectively proven, like God, or Santa Claus. Apollo can be proven thus, so lying won't work. Sorry.
@@thewildcellist Just because they made the Apollo does not prove it landed on the moon then flew back to earth. 230,000 miles each way on a single tank of fuel. Sorry not sorry.
@@Motleymick "a single tank of fuel?" Yikes.
Space isn't called "space" for nothing. As astronaut Bill Anders put it while enroute to the Moon on Apollo 8, “...Isaac Newton is doing most of the driving now.” Once a spacecraft has momentum, there're no impediments (like atmosphere) to stop it or slow it down, so it takes less fuel than you might think to travel those 230+ thousand miles.
You've been watching too much Star Trek.
Stanley Kubrick was hired by NASA to film the moon landing, Kubrick was so focused on getting the shots absolutely perfect he ended up filming on-location.
you had me at first lmao well done
This comment is made hundreds of times on every single moon video. Plagiarism at its finest
@@KnoxxJerz exactly
As one who lived through this period, I don’t find it funny at all…despite Kubrick being one of my favorite film makers.
Cool story bro
it was dark you can look at both sides of the screen, and the light source were focus at a point as spotlight, not the sun. I believe that we are neither stupid nor foolish.
Wow, I think that's the most wrong stuff that I've seen in the least amount of words.
How bright and far away would that light have to be to replicate this scene to the scale shown?
Answer:
As bright and as far as the sun
These are the sharpest, most clear videos of the moon walk
Well, he up-converts them with modern CGI, which also cleans it up a bit. But, yes, these were shot on 16mm film, which is far sharper than a low-res TV signal.
So hard to get scale, I thought the tiny craters a few feet wide were still hundreds of feet accross till the end....What?
Ssssshhh you are not supposed to think out of the fake media box
@@lesterinvester167 shut up schyzo
@@lesterinvester167 Ssssshhhhh! It’s better for you to stay quiet and have people think you might be a moron, rather than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
there are craters of all sizes.
We went to the Moon.
This stuff is incredible. Even though I know the outcome I get so nervous watching the landing and the lengthy ascent. The improved frame rate makes it more real - and more scary! Thanks so much.
Yeah I was a little worried they were gonna run out of fuel on decent. Maybe we can hear the nerves in their voices.
@@TheOneNashon how?
I get that way every time I watch Apollo 13 the movie.
It’s fake
@@rawnuklesWell that wouldn’t happen because the place they filmed it they had a fuel station near by, Hollywood always comes prepared bro !
I'd like to believe this incredible accomplishment as much as anybody else but ... who got out of the lunar module and assembled the lighting rig pictured in the left part of shot at 4:45 to illuminate the "eagle" sitting on the moon's surface? it has a bright light, tripod stand, light directing umbrella & wires leading thru the dust to the right out of shot where it's presumably energized. the only source of electricity would be the lunar module itself right? so, the guy descending ladder at 5:30 isn't the first man out bc someone (if this were real, true, reliable video footage) has to erect a lighting rig and camera before johnny 7 makes his big entrance. also, the "flag pole" is already installed in "this" video at 5:30 beyond the lunar module's shadow, reflecting light off it.
besides all that, we're generally expected to naively swallow this aluminum foil/curtain rod tree fort, controlled with microwave technology, then blasts off to re-dock with the stationary/orbiting "space craft" that the men are inside when they "splash down" in the Indian ocean two days later? how the phuck did they do that? how do you even practice that zero gravity maneuver? curious, there is no footage of the separating of/or re-docking of that module and the eagle/lunar module isn't it? non sense. if they did this feat why did they not continue during the 70's, 80's, 90's, new century with more modern tech? nasa says they lost the tech that had and used in the late 60's. that's absurd. saying nothing would've been a more respectable decision. nasa's version of 'my dog ate it'.
4:45 was the second EVA. They got out first, placed the experiments, got back inside to rest and refill the PLSS, then went out a second time. This is the second time.
The light is the sun. After the astronaut adjusts the aperture of the camera, you can also very clearly see that it’s a satellite dish and not an umbrella. The shadow is also nearly completely transparent so that’s a really bad umbrella.
How did they take off from the moon, redock with the CSM in orbit travelling around 4,000mph, transfer the crew, experiments and rock samples, undock and then return home? With great difficulty and with previous missions like Apollo 10 which was a rehearsal for Apollo 11 where the were around 9 miles from the surface of the moon before being forced to return to the CSM as well as missions going around the moon unmanned, manned, and probes.
There is footage of the docking and undocking of the LM to the CSM.
They didn’t continue because of funding cuts. America had almost everything focused on Apollo during that time which is why they went from first manned flight in 1962 to footprints on the moon in 1969. An example of something similar to this happening would be the development of the British Dreadnought battleships which when they were first made, took just over a year to make when today, it takes several years. This was because it was a national priority, just like Apollo.
They never lost the tech, just the means to make them because of, yet again, funding as well as a new program called the shuttle which had nothing in common with the Saturn-V.
NASA always wanted to go back, they just couldn’t because they didn’t have the funds
@reset-xs9ql are you a copy and paste troll or a genuinely stupid person... ?
This is not the Eagle. This is A14. And the light is the sun. And why do you want to see video of the docking manuver? You'll just reject it as fake, right? At any rate, there is indeed video of the docking, which you can find in about 10 seconds here in You Tube. 4:45
they looked so happy to be there! little happy hops
I try to put myself in he shoes of people watching this live and it sends chills up my spine. Great job. It is still incredible to see humanity at its best. No matter what anybody says or how hard we try to prove otherwise, we really are a damn smart bunch of monkeys!
I watched it live. I was 15 years old. What a time to be alive!
Very true. We sure are assholes, but we sure are smart too.
Chills up your spine, seriously?
Kundalini 😅💫
@@Nekomesha ikr lmao
9:49 old mate left his esky behind!
Yeah, they threw their PLSS (Personal Life Support System) out the hatch of the LM before ascent to save weight.
@@campbellwright3743 as moon landing is due on in future wish they retrieve the same and bring it back to earth to check what solar flare effect.
So unbelievable and exciting, to this day, 2024!!!
notice the flag doesent move unless they touch it
Correct.
it flaps
@@langraman8756 Really flaps during the liftoff..
@@neilbishop1686 You would too if you were standing next to that exhaust. As for the movement that is nothing more than the flexible tubular aluminum pole being twisted and moved when it is being touched. It never moved after they left it alone.
@@pleasepermitmetospeakohgre1504 That's just the wind.
I love seeing historic pictures, and wondering about the people and places in them. This was no different, wondering what the astronauts must have felt, thought, said in the moments that we don't see on video. Imagining what went on around the flag, and the vehicle that were left behind. There is so much life in everything, and everyone, it would take multiple lifetimes to explore it all, but I am just happy for a glimpse of even the smallest bits.
Look again czcams.com/video/JhvHoWCRuN0/video.html
it looks funny
Don't be so gullible.
@@DoubleoP Wow, you waited a year to post that inane comment.
@@smeeself wow, you're so clever. 😀
@Paul Nope. Just not a conspiracy nutter.
( so... I suppose, relatively, probably. )
Is it possible to doubt the reality of flying to the moon after watching this video? It's really incredible, it's really cool that people were able to do this!
Possible...😅
@@tamasszakal9834 how?
@@tamasszakal9834it’s not
Sort of. We can't even get service when hiking on a mountain trail, but in 1969 they were able to tranmit via live television-from the Moon? Wow! That is incredible technology that would be nice to have today.
@@journeywithnichole986 are you joking? they couldn’t get service very well back then either, yet they could broadcast from the moon yes. That’s because those things have very little to do with each other
And...Action! 🎬
Wow. How does this not have more views. Good work duder.
Post it on Reddit in appropriate subreddit, and it'll get exposure
Francot12 idiots like you who think it is fake?
Couchmann941 idiots like you who thinks this is real
@@Francot12 Chill bro sheeeiiittt.
People are sick and tired of NASA lies and bullshit. We only want to see it exposed and terminated forever.
I love watching how far the dust flies... it keeps going and going.
True. Recently someone did a study and determined that some of the dust kicked up by the LM's descent engine may have traveled a quarter of the way around the moon before it finally came down.
@@joevignolor4u949 one of the apollo missions also landed near (few hundred feet, I think) a probe we landed earlier, and the dust pretty much stripped all the paint off it and destroyed its lens
@@TheAechBomb You are talking about Apollo 12. They also cut off the probe's TV camera and its robotic arm that had scooped up some lunar soil. Both of those components were brought back and are now in a museum and I've seen them on display. Also, the TV camera had live bacteria living inside of it that was there when the camera was manufactured. It had survived several years being on the moon.
@@joevignolor4u949 I didn't know which one it was, thank you
The only time that flag will ever be 'blowing in the wind'
Unreal but real.
unreal, but unreal. sorry.
@@Mindvirus-ly5ed A one week old obvious sock puppet account belonging to a dishonest dullard spewing baseless nonsense? I’m absolutely shocked. 🤣
Do better, learn.
Что сказать то. Просто потрясающе. Это сейчас то выглядит как фантастика, а тогда так это вообще уму не постижимо. Браво, молодцы, что ещё сказать.
нас в школе учили что тень на Луне абсолютно черная в виду отсутствия атмосферы и в тени ничего не видно. То что мы видим что то в тени на Земле, это свойства воздуха.
А ещё они оставили там медали в честь первых людей в космосе, таких как Гагарин несмотря на то что тогда была холодная война в разгаре. Очень хороший жест.
@@bobododoo3925 просто качество обучения в вашей школе плохое. Поэтому вы глупый выросли😊
@@Healton это как посмотреть. В вакууме тень должна быть контрастной, однородной. А атмосферы на луне нет.
We wouldn’t have gotten there without you ruskies
I knew Edgar Mitchell. On my desk, I've got a really nice autographed photo of him holding a map on the Moon that Al Shepard took during one of their EVAs. It's always so wild to hear a friend's familiar voice in these recordings from the lunar surface. It really is a small world - or pair of worlds in this case. Thanks for posting this footage.
@Крым,Ялта ,Александр. Nope, not stupid at all. There is no air or wind on the moon. The flag had a horizontal metal tube inserted in a pocket sewn along the top edge. That was to hold the flag out and make it look like it was fluttering in the breeze. Otherwise, it would just drape down over the pole and not be very visible. The movement you can see is the flag settling down after being rammed into the lunar surface. With no air, there's no air resistance on the Moon, so it takes a while for the motion to settle down due to inertia.
There is solar wind, but that works differently and would not cause the flag to flutter. Solar wind particles have very little mass and you would not notice any movement they might cause.
Edgar said it’s was a hoax
@@joshuasasfire2759source please. I’d like to see that for myself.
I’m here to tell you that this shit was faker than unicorns!
@@bullymaguire4457 : naive.
And still some dudes gonna say “it’s fake NASA never goes to moon” I mean what NASA feels when they hear this. You guys will never no how hard it was to land on moon.
Because its all fake lol
@@xxmemekipxxlastname4846is an idiot prove it then.
@@wolfbbq6076 you prove that it did happen.
XxMemekipxX last name The vast body of evidence supports the reality of the Apollo programme. The onus is on you - and pointing at images declaring them to be fake because of “reasons” is not evidence. I wait with baited breath.......
@@martinc3918 dude i dont understand half the words youre saying but thats not proof it happened
I think this is one of the most amazing pieces of footage I've ever seen
As I recall reading, the swaying of the LEM ascent stage was done to keep down weight and complexity of the ascent engine, and also to simplify the code of the LEM's guidance computer. Basically, the ascent engine's nozzle doesn't gimble, instead the RCS is employed during ascent to keep the LEM on the correct trajectory, but there is a lag which is what causes the swaying.
That feeling of landing on a celestial being just seems so exiting to me for some reason.
the distance would freak me out lol
yes, like destroying the mother earth isn't exciting anymore, lets discover some more to satisfy the human ego
@@chandruishwar1what?
I agree, but something that makes me sad is realising that 99% of the time the celestial beings are barren. When considering how empty and lifeless most are, it makes me feel so special and lucky to live on Earth, with its millions of creatures and wonders.
@@chandruishwar1 What are you doing to help? Recycling plastic?
This is an amazing accomplishment. Great vid. Cheers
Nicely done
Imagine just standing there, in the moment ON THE MOON looking back at earth. Knowing your the only human and will be for a very long time to experience that.
Then getting a really bad itch on your nose.😨
And realizing that you don’t know the difference between your and you’re.
@@johnp139 it’s a CZcams comment. Not a college paper. If I wanna half ass type something I can and will. Go unalive youself
I’m always amazed at scales on the moon. Distance is impossible to judge. When they land those craters just look like the large ones but they’re only a foot across!
in Kerbal space program I always orient myself using the shadow of the landing craft, even after a new update introduced the "altitude from the ground" meter that showed your exact distance to the ground and not to sea level. unfortunately for the astronauts, they don't have 3rd-person-view and magic displays that are always correct
Haynes publishing has a really neat book on the Lunar Rover where that problem is discussed. One component of it is that the less than perfectly clear atmosphere here on Earth give that distance haze effect & and another is the presence of things where we know their general scale, such as trees on distant hills. And there was none of that on the moon.
Scott FW It must be a really weird sensation. Clarity everywhere! Even Mars’ thin atmosphere is enough to give it that Earth like hazy distance. I live in the mountains in Japan and the haze is something that makes every morning look different.
Thats cuz the moon isnt real is an artificial megastructure made by god to watch over earth... depth of craters isnt adding up to the moon tickness ratio and the moon itself seems to be hollow inside at ceirtan depth
@@maximpikalev9538 exactly----what I thought
a reminder that the flag only moves when the astronauts are holding it and adjusting it, and if it really was wind wouldn't all that sand be flying like crazy?
😉
It's quite clear the flag only waves when it's touched, proves there's no wind.
I love this movie! One of the crappiest yet most celebrated pictures of all time. Almost puts even shoah business to shame!
INDIA 🇮🇳 made history by becoming the only country to land on the south pole of Moon.
🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
Vande mataram 🇮🇳🇮🇳
@@siddheshnalawade5380 which city u live?
Yes🎉
Vande mataram
Yes I'm from Hyderabad 🚩
4:10 landing
9:53 liftoff
hoax
I don't know if anyone has ever noticed or even bring it up but if you pay attention when the astronauts are descending the craters never change size. This means that it's camera trickery, when they first show them they give an illusion that they are big but as they are about to land they still look the same size. This means that the "moon" is just a small size replica and this is why the craters stay the same size the whole time.
Question: how are you able to determine scale with absolutely no reference for scale? The craters at the start of the video are several km wide, they just look similar to the ones when they are outside the LM because they basically are the same, just smaller.
@@archierush868 The reference to scale would be the window seal around the porthole being looked through.
@@ChrisNear-gc6cxyes, there are markers on the windows for the astronauts to see an estimate for distance and they also had some sensors and probably radar for that, the question is asked was how were they able to do it here since the camera during descent had none of those markets, and so no easy way to discern scale or distance from the camera at the start of the video.
@@archierush868 The man who posted the comment was talking about ,,just eyeballing it,,,you did not understand his comment and thought you would mix up a word salad trying to sound smart. face it everyone can see this is fake.
Wouldn't be surprised to see a Starbucks out the window
I love how casual this looks when taking the pic, its literally like taking a photo of yourself in front of some landmark when on holiday. i'm surprised he's not putting some thumbs up or pointing at the flag lmao pose man!
Kinda hard to in those suits.
@@PanzerkampfwagenausfTschechosl if they can hammer a pole into the ground, they can lift their arm to thumbs up...
@@terpz47 The reason they couldn't hammer it in was because of the surface
@@gabedrinkswaterthey hammered it pretty well seeing as when they flew off you could see the amount of force was blown onto it and it didnt fall over…
@@SincerelyYoursLIVE it literally fell over
Wow how amazing.. I was born in 1977 and am blown away every time I see this
Incredible 😮
Yeah this looks 100% real
If NASA filmed themselves on the sun the pro-Apollo-nutters would __100%___ believe it and we would be the "conspiracy theorists" for even questioning it.
FASCINATING!!!
To say the least. WOW!!!
I used to watch film of the Apolo mission as a kid in my space suit my mom made for me, upside down on the couch pretending I was about to lift off on a Saturn V. Still instills so much pride in what we as a unified nation accomplished, and what we contributed to the world.
@L. Dega i mean theres proof, satellites have taken pictures, the Chinese rover on the moon has proven it, and what would the Chinese gain from furthering a American lie if we didnt land on the moon? But no, you're right, we didn't and theres no proof.
@L. Dega no it didn't, it landed in Mare Imbrium which is on the light side of the moon.
@L. Dega ok you've answered nothing. I did the research and gave you an actual location on the moon, which i cross referenced with multiple credible sources and you follow up with " NO!!!! LOL it landed on the far side dude" very convincing argument. But I guess we'll see just how wrong you are when the Artemis program goes back to the moon, with hi-res photos but youll probably deny those as well.
This is Commander Alan Shepard (first American in space!) and Lunar Module Pilot Edgar Mitchell with Command Module Pilot Stuart Roosa orbiting somewhere up there.
This is the mission where they 'played golf' on The Moon. hehe
why is the light so poor from the 5th to 9th minute when they are meant to be in bright sunlight? Looks like he had to cut the ends of his glove off to get the flag up at 9.30. Weren't they pressurized suits?
A lot of people are suspicious about how it looks like the flag is moving in wind but they dont understand the effect of having no atmosphere would be on such a thing. The only force i can think of that would damp the motion of the flag is gravity so any little movement will make it flop a lot. couldve been a cool study
The flag is not moving at all when not touched (but for specific cases when gases where released near it).
This was NOT filmed in a studio. It was filmed in my back yard in Atlanta.
it s not funny
You should set up a hot dog stand, sell tickets, give tours.
Could actually be funny.
Damn, you have a big ass backyard!
@@simpleinverso8628 doesnt look that big to me haha look closely
Shut up... I know nothing about that
I think it'd more expensive to fake this at that time than to actually go there
Martin Mitter Yes. The technology to fake it didn't even exist back in the day. It is easier to just go to the actual moon since all the stuff was avaible (the math etc.) and the only challenge was to build the rocket and stuff. (Of course not exactly like this but you know what i mean)
Ye ye amazing accomplishment
So amazing we haven’t been able to achieve it since, and still can’t
@@lesterinvester167 Have you always been this desperate for attention?
lesterinvester We're going back in a few so just sit back and relax
Is landing a man on the moon outside of a Hollywood soundstage still possible and which country will be first?
It's almost 2024 and it's still amazing. I cannot imagine what people thought in 1969.
It was amazing....and still is.
I’m sorry but this shit never gets old not then, not now 51 yrs later and probably not in a 100 yrs from now .
Fake
I expected more from a Cohen to understand deception. Smh
@@anatoli28 Your brain is fake.
Its amazing what Hollywood was capable of doing even back then
Je älter desto moderner.
Imagine standing on the moon, and the only thing between you and the vastness of the universe is your spacesuit.
Watching the first landing and Armstrong stepping off was surreal . Then walking outside looking up at the moon it was a rush 🇺🇸
We didn't watch the first Apollo landing live actually - nor the other ones! - we only listened to the intense radio traffic.
Many people still believe that they did watch the Apollo landing(s) live, but that is a false memory.
What we did watch however - and have been seeing since then - are "video clips" made from the 16 mm film shot by a small film camera placed above Buzz Aldrin's head.
A "small" B&W TV camera producing a live TV-signal would have been far too big to sit in that position back in those days.
So they had to get the Apollo crews back to Earth first and develop their 16 mm films first, before we could see what their lunar landings actually looked like
This is of course also the case with the films that were shot out of the LEM window by the same fixed 16 mm camera - showing the activities of the two Apollo astronauts ( flag mounting, setting up technical equipment etc. ) on the lunar surface.
Does anyone know whats with the feedback on the comms? Is that just from how NASA relayed the data?
They say that Stanley Kubrick faked the moon landing, but was such a perfectionist that he demanded they film On Location.
Poor him, still shaking. Lies are not good to karma, even if you are forced or driven. I give him some heart, because he (may) overcome his wow-ego, in the way, he put some ridiculously in the story and in his work. He put a seed of truth in any story, that is why we can call him genious. Maybe, a Hero, if the seed will grow. But this ist still a question.
@@PatrickLensch , mate, get help. Seriously.
@@UteChewb a lie is a lie, no help will change that 🥱
Patrick Lensch, but when it’s not a lie, it’s not a lie.
@@Icemanin1994 is that true? 'No lie is no lie'. I do not like to handle with lies ... 😅 but: truth is truth 🙏
Wonderful.
Wonderful, wonderful, wonderful.
- Lorence Welk's favorite phrase.
This is fascinating
Excellent moment
They did great job at Langley alright.
Since the first space x launch that I watched live all the way to docking, I haven’t stopped watching space exploration videos. This is fascinating to say the least. I do hope we get to that point where you can buy a ticket and fly to space just like traveling to another country.
Mr Man Too, its really interesting
My dad said we was offered a trip just into orbit and back when he was working for this company. It would have been like $300k and that was in 70s
That last part is very cool, but sadly that'd be like a thing during the age of being a type 2 civilisation with multiple stars to travel across.
@@stmsin even if he had accepted that, it likely would have never happened anyways. considering we have only had one singular private mission to low earth orbit in that style, that happening in the 70s is a pipedream. the majority of spaceflight startups die within a year or two. SpaceX was a good example of how close and fast bankruptcy comes.
commercial space travel will be sick.
I'm OLD enough to have seen it LIVE.
Must have been awesome
me too.... and I did watch it LIVE
Holy moly, tell me moar, m8
@Colorado Strong Oh cmon, just shut up and admit that all of your arguments are easily proved to be wrong wtih basic science.
@Colorado Strong have you considered that maybe, the rover may have been sitting there for half an hour and the dust had settled, the thing was super light, and the tracks would have been tiny...
Still wicked exciting!
Сколько секунд проработал двигатель при взлёте с луны при выходе на орбиту? Судя по ролику и видом на лунную поверхность с 9:50 они поднимались на воздушном шаре.
Я в сомнении, хотя всегда был уверен в посещении луны.
Подробностей t работы двигателя при взлёте с луны, не нашёл....
I miss this. I miss when we were proud of our scientists and engineers. We attempted the unthinkable and actually did it. God, I really miss that.
Quale Dio?😂 l'Uomo, semmai.......
Hello? You aren't proud of things like the James Webb telescope for example?
I'm afraid the internet has brought World wide insanity as a by-product.
hoax
@@mandrill173…is a fool
Great work mate. I love everything about the Apollo program
www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/
@@ancelrick5396 wow, this is great. Thanks
@@andrewangerer1399 I enjoyed it when I stumbled onto it. They seem to be the complete film rolls, crappy pictures and all
@@ancelrick5396 Wow! Great page Ancel Rick! There is like every photo in Apollo history there!
At age 9, going on 10, it was a magical time to be alive and seeing the first Moon Launch and Landing live on TV. It seemed like an eternity while watching all the prior test Launches from the fatal tragedy of Apollo 1 on through to the Lunar Orbiter to Apollo 11's landing. Then it became a routine mission in a short span of 3 years and 5 months from 11 to 17, with the miracle of Apollo 13 in between. The Space program was bever as exciting since, with the exception of several of the Mars Rover landings.
"it doesn't bother me. someone will return one day and find the stuff we left up there"
It may turn out to be the Soviet Moon rover.
very good attempt at convincing everyone but unlike the easily fooled people like myself with history of physics in a vacuum can easily see the flaws in this footage
This is real… if it was faked the Soviets would have been the first to say it was fake, but they never did.
Ok, tell what "flaws" are in this footage?
Actually the soviets did say it was faked... You just never heard about it
@@joshbrz8902 What flaws are there?
When something is so unbelievable like this, ppl sadly resort to unbelieving it.
I agree, this thing is majestic
Yep.
The masses of ignorant people in the world including Moon landing denying cultist, flat earthers, and other fringe conspiracy theorists:
A group of people who very likely suffer from an array of psychological issues; chief among which is Identity-Protective Cognition. There are certain markers that preclude those who fall for cult’s schemes and tactics for example. These markers overlap when dealing with conspiracy theorists and those that deny facts due to their feelings. Often times it deals with not feeling special or chronic low self esteem/insecurities mixed with deep-seated trust issues, likely brought on by trauma, and an insatiable need to feel important; what would make someone feel more important than thinking they know better than most of the people on Earth and all of the scientific community. It’s a desperate ploy and vicious cycle of needing to feel important and a sense they belong.
@@DemonDrummerprojecting much?
@@trendynow1369 Nope, but way to ironically/hypocritically project in your comment accusing me of doing just that. Remember, you’re the one that believes unfounded nonsense and unproven speculative subjective conjecture based on nothing but ignorance, feelings, and fallacious logic.
Let that sink in. 🤗
Do better, learn.
@@DemonDrummer Here's how to prove this was fake:
1. Change your video to .25 speed, the slowest speed on the CZcams settings.
2. Go to the part where they take off, start about 9:57.
3. Watch the footprints closely as they withstand what makes the flag violently move.
Wow, coming in for a landing on the moon must have been absolutely terrifying!!!!
Nobody knows.
@@MrMarco855 They do, they were there!
正に歴史的な瞬間。背景に星がないのはカメラの絞りを極限まで絞っている為。月面は地球上よりも太陽光が遥かに強烈なので星を映るようにすると飛行士はハレーションでとんでしまい写らない。
Where is Zarathustra?