Electric off the line is a huge advantage. Add to that, one of the most aerodynamic bodies in the industry. I wasn't surprised at all. I've met probably 30 i8 owners... and only one of them was dissatisfied.
Tells you how much the BMW deppreciates. You never included how expensive the BMW is to service including the Life and cost of those BMW batteries. If wasn't the BMW one would call a collectable. It's hard to believe one can purchase a 10 year old hybrid for $30000 unless it's because it was a failure that tells me to avoid that Awd BMW. Your tester is a base $40,000 mustang likely with 317 gears. Regular exhaust and base tires and interior. Here's the Hugh issue with the BMW I8. Most say that the new $160,000 BMW i8 was a failure for BMW because it didn't excel in either performance or eco-friendliness, and it lost half its value in its first year: The 1st year of ownership. That sucks.
I own an i8 in Germany. Love it. Hardly uses fuel. Very quiet in town. Lots of attention. and when I floor it, 100 to 200 kmh is really quick. above 240 kmh not so fast, but its not often the road is open enough for that kind of speed.
yeah i have to agree with you, its just that it was a bit overpriced when it launched. If it was pricedfor like 60k when new it would have been selling like hot cakes
I see comments about pricing it at 1/3. It’s highly likely that it cost BMW more than that to produce it!! 😂😂 are they to increase losses? That’s all they would be doing if they price it below theirs costs to produce,,,,. They would be bankrupt in a short while with that business model. You guys throw out these numbers without even thinking about the costs to produce these cars. The technology the I8 had 10 years ago was highly innovative and expensive as h*ll!! It’s much cheaper now, so you can’t compare it to today’s similar vehicles. The I8 was a bespoke vehicle, meaning there was not a lot of carry over from other BMWs they could use to cut costs. I just don’t get how these hypothetical numbers can be pulled out of thin air! 😂😂.
The problem is that the i8 was misunderstood by influencers thinking that it was a supercar or an M product. It was a design study / proof of concept by making a niche sporty hybrid. It had double the hp of a Prius but twice the efficiency of an E90 M3.
Very true. A lot of misdirected hate towards the car. BMW obviously knew what they were doing and they certainly could have made it more powerful had they wanted to, but that wasn’t the point. Part of me is kind of glad that it was misunderstood because it allowed me to buy one 7 years ago at half price with only 5,000 miles on it. It’s a wonderful car. You can glide around town in electric mode and then go into sport mode and it becomes a different car. It may not be supercar fast, but it is not slow. The electric torque delivery makes it feel quite quick. I traded in an F10 M5 with 200 more horsepower, but the i8 feels quicker. Plus I got about 18 mpg in the M5. In the i8 I get close to 50.
This was an example of the advantage of turbos, and electric power, at high altitude. These cars perform about the same at sea level, but the i8 only lost half a second from its 1/4 time.
@@gregzebrak4090 I don't think the axle ratio makes any difference at all with the auto. It shifts out of first by 40mph and chips 2nd immediately to 50mph. That's short gearing for a 500hp car, even though it weighs 2 tons. Maybe with the manual, but the manual is slower anyway.
Ever since I was a kid. The i8 has always been a cool looking car to me. And to this day I still think it’s one of the best looking cars BMW has ever made!
I remember back in 2020 or 2021 TFL was trying to purchase an i8 via vroom but somehow the check was lost by Vroom (really cannot believe this thing actually happened). Now look at Vroom which no longer exists, lol. Congrats on the long due i8 again.
BMW. The brand notorious for sandbagging it's actual horse power numbers. Worth calling out that the hybrid system is doing a lot of legwork in that drivetrain. I am sure it is helping a ton at altitude. Would love to see what this i8 puts down at the dyno.
@TheFastLaneCar- There should be no surprise, that a $150,000 vehicle, has a better interior, vs a $50,000 vehicle. To calculate power to weight more accurately, tq has to be included. Example: If the BMW has a combined Hp of 357, & combined Tq. Of 535, add together, then divide. So 892 divided by 2= 446 combined power output average, divided by weight. Then the mustang's 486 Hp, & 415 Tq.= 901 divided by 2= approx. the same @ 450.5 combined power output average, ( @ sea Level ), not to mention its 200 Lbs. heavier, + Rwd, vs Awd. I wonder how close these 2 vehicles would be in a 1/4 mile drag race, @ sea Level, on a properly prepped drag racing surface? I was surprised that the mustang had a shorter stopping distance. I was NOT surprised that the mustang sounded so much better. Great video. P.s. I just seen some drag racing video's showing a 2015 BMW i8, and a 2024 mustang Gt, 5.0 Liter, w/10 speed, ran @ the same Atco dragstrip. The BMW i8's best E.T. was a 12.55 @ 112 Mph, vs the Mustangs 12.15 @ 118 Mph!
@@Lakikano Yes If you own the BMW in for 4 years you could have paid for a New Mustang with the repair cost of of the BMW . Most likey it will cost you more than the New Mustang .
Or just buy a 2023 840i XDrive with less than 15K miles for the same price as those (or almost 50% off the original MSRP) and still has a warranty. Almost 50% depreciation in just a year! 🙀
I just test-drove said 840i and am thinking about buying it. With a little negotiation, probably $47K!!! Looks much better than the Stang, is much more luxurious inside out, and just as quick.
Both cars were raced stock from factory, and the i8 also has 10 years on the mustang with 40k miles on it. I'm sure it wouldn't make a difference anyways that mustang is heavy compared to the i8. Weight reduction may help out the mustang and an intake if you weren't going to do any mods on i8
Three things, 1 excellent video guys, 2 that three cylinder sounds way better than I thought it would and 3 why would I pay so much for SoloDL when it's going to give miss information Lol!!!!
Crazy how 30.000 miles would knock a hundred tho off the price of a car! I was very impressed how bad it beat the Stang! I think the look of the beamer still looks bad a$$. I love the villian looking front end. But always remember that this is a wealthy person's car and up keep may be a little costly with all that tech. But damn she looks good!
Well, you've got a lighter car with two drive mode advantages that aren't as effected by altitude (electric and turbocharging) as a NA engine will be. Still, the Mustang as done well in all the drag races you've put it through, but like you, I don't think any of us were expecting this one to be so lopsided. I suppose it was bound to happen eventually! ;-)
11:26 kase Incredible outstanding job. You gave raw real moment The look on your face. Bro I want bear hug ya 😂Best part for me. Tommy and Andre Outstanding job as well.
All i can say u must be up there in elevation because my 2018 RS 3:6 camaro at sea level runs 13.6 107mph. I know the mustang GT runs 12’s at sea level. But that BMW is still a great buy very impressive.
The BMW i8 might have less HP (357) than the Mustang GT but it has more torque (420lbft) at lower rpm, which helps it achieve a faster launch off the line. The Mustang is also quite a bit heavier and only really gets moving when that 5.0L Coyote engine gets above 4000rpm.
The 2025 Ford Mustang GT, GT performance pack and the Dark horse are more expensive. They also got rid of the high performance pack for the 2.3L four pot
@@G82Watts So does servicing that BMW . FYI. That $150,000 BMW depreciated by 50,% The first year of ownership. That's a performance pack mustang GT with $100,000 in the Bank
@@joshc606 He said "one of the best straightline performance deals you can buy" around 0:30. If you metric is a) fast in a straight line and b) cheap then a muscle car on a tired old platform is not a good deal when a korean economy SUV can take 2 seconds on it in the quarter mile.
@@HolaSoyJaydepends on the race...a drag race? Sure the Mustang all the way... on track? The gr86 would be better, especially with experienced drivers in both.
If you want to flex and catch someone’s eye get the I8 but if you want a traditional v8 that will be a classic and will be special forever, mustang all day.
i8 looks cool and it's pretty quick but at 10 years old, how much longer will the battery pack last? How much would it cost to replace? I'll take the Mustang.
The new ZR1 Corvette is nice, especially in convertible. Ford is dropping the ball. They should make a new mid engine Thunderbird to be the Corvette fighter. Ford GT is ridiculously expensive and v6, Thunderbird should be affordable and V8. Similar to Corvette.
I remember the reviews for the i8 saying the factory tires really let it down. It had Bridgestone ecopias or something. Does that one have better rubber on it? I wonder if the mods for the mini would work on the i8.
i8 is pretty quick indeed! but yea 150k new was too much for the performance lol like idk I bet you could get something like a 911 GTS for that price at the time
Considering the Mustang is handicapped by elevation and is stock, I'm sure the transmission is fine. As for the i8, it has 2 electric motors and a turbo 3... the transmission is fine here as well, lol
Had an i8 sadly got rid of it when BMW stopped supporting it and stopped working on them! I have an ICE car again because manufacturers do not support EV's long term.
I feel like the i8 is not representative of most manufacturers support of EVs, considering it was a very rare car with bespoke components. Most modern EVs are built with shared components
@@justinbecker4772 Exactly right just like how my neighbor received delivery of his Fisker after a 4 1/2 year of waiting and they just went out of business and he said his vehicle needs service does not run and is also only worth 32% of its value on trade in 💀 I feel you don't understand EV's yet kid. My 2 year old low mile model Y is worth exactly 51% what I paid because the technology changed so fast they are literally worthless second hand. ICE still retains way more value and I sold many trucks for more than I paid two years later when using family discounts
@@user-bv3wo2qh1d lol, anyone who looked at fisker's books knew that company was doomed. I rely on people like you to eat the depreciation so I can buy cheap EV's. Looking forward to my $35k Ionic 5 N in a year.
Literally no supercar racing a muscle car.... you can say sports car, but it's not a supercar.... that's like saying a lotus evora is a supercar, it's not.
I'd call the Evora a super car. Most (non car enthusiast) people think it's a Ferrari . That's usually a good indication of a super car in the eyes of the general public.
I find it funny the reason I know about the i8 before it even came out is because the letter I in the number eight are very close together on a keyboard, and I was just randomly mashing the keyboard after BMW and input it i8 on accident and boy it was a Happy accident because that thing was cool
ComeOnMan......There's a reason why $150k car loses that much money. After the warranty is gone. So is your savings. I take the Mustang with a new car warranty.
With modern super- and turbochargers, there's really no reason to have naturally aspirated engines anymore. The Porsche 992 Turbo S makes 174 hp a litre...
@@richfarfugnuven6308- the reliability is improving every year. Current turbochargers last well over 100,000 miles. There are F150s out there with 200,000+ miles on the turbochargers. My buddy has a dealership and is see the records of some serious high milers! If you don’t learn & change with the times you start to sound silly with simple & much less relevant comments. The manufacturers don’t produce stuff expecting it to break down. They would all be out of business so to speak. Even Toyota is switching to turbocharging. They have a huge reputation they need to protect. Unfortunately the Tundras are failing at an abnormal rate for Toyota, but it has nothing to do with the Turbos. Do your oil changes, with the proper specified oils and turbos last very well. If you are not good at maintaining your vehicles, THEN a turbocharged engine may cost you, but that would be the owner’s fault for poor maintenance.
I8 was quicker than I expected...
I'm surprised too. I'm guessing its the result of the electric motor at altitude, where gas engines are taking a hit?
Electric off the line is a huge advantage. Add to that, one of the most aerodynamic bodies in the industry. I wasn't surprised at all.
I've met probably 30 i8 owners... and only one of them was dissatisfied.
I did NOT know the i8 was that quick holy shit
I think elevation must have helped, as ICE don't like thin air.
Be interesting to compare again at sea level and/or much lower temps.
@@anonimushboshand on a prepped strip also keep in mind the mustang is 600 pounds heavier than the i8
The i8 still looks modern and futuristic despite being 10 years old, one of the best if not the best looking BMW modern era in my opinion.
besides the interior
@@OOOnananaAnd the back end
Tells you how much the BMW deppreciates. You never included how expensive the BMW is to service including the Life and cost of those BMW batteries. If wasn't the BMW one would call a collectable. It's hard to believe one can purchase a 10 year old hybrid for $30000 unless it's because it was a failure that tells me to avoid that Awd BMW. Your tester is a base $40,000 mustang likely with 317 gears. Regular exhaust and base tires and interior.
Here's the Hugh issue with the BMW I8.
Most say that the new $160,000 BMW i8 was a failure for BMW because it didn't excel in either performance or eco-friendliness, and it lost half its value in its first year: The 1st year of ownership. That sucks.
I own an i8 in Germany. Love it. Hardly uses fuel. Very quiet in town. Lots of attention. and when I floor it, 100 to 200 kmh is really quick. above 240 kmh not so fast, but its not often the road is open enough for that kind of speed.
take off the limiter
@@chad_3894 It has no limiter - it keeps going to about 270-280 but just takes avery long time to get there.
Boosted vs NA is the problem! Altitude for NA cars is like driving with the brakes on!
Yup! Stock gt should be mid to high 12s.
@@sapperROSSstock gt 10spd at sea level is a high 11 second car, plenty out thier running 11.80-12.00 at sea level bone stock right down to the tires
I8 runs somewhere around mid 12's aswell and I've seen high 11 with just a ecu tune @sapperROSS
@@sapperROSS I had a 2011 Mustang GT, the first year of the Coyote engine. With the crappy stock tires I still ran a 12.9@110 in the 1/4 mile!
BRO 1.3 LITERS BLAHAHAHAHAH TEN YEARS OLD A TURBO THE SIZE OF A GATORADE
Say what you will about the i8, but it's easily one of the best-looking BMWs ever
yeah i have to agree with you, its just that it was a bit overpriced when it launched. If it was pricedfor like 60k when new it would have been selling like hot cakes
@@chrism869I agree, if it was 1:3rd the price they would have sold more 🫡
"what you will about the i8"
I see comments about pricing it at 1/3. It’s highly likely that it cost BMW more than that to produce it!! 😂😂 are they to increase losses? That’s all they would be doing if they price it below theirs costs to produce,,,,. They would be bankrupt in a short while with that business model.
You guys throw out these numbers without even thinking about the costs to produce these cars. The technology the I8 had 10 years ago was highly innovative and expensive as h*ll!! It’s much cheaper now, so you can’t compare it to today’s similar vehicles. The I8 was a bespoke vehicle, meaning there was not a lot of carry over from other BMWs they could use to cut costs.
I just don’t get how these hypothetical numbers can be pulled out of thin air! 😂😂.
🤢
The problem is that the i8 was misunderstood by influencers thinking that it was a supercar or an M product. It was a design study / proof of concept by making a niche sporty hybrid. It had double the hp of a Prius but twice the efficiency of an E90 M3.
well said.
It's not a bad car but it's a car that looks like a super car but gets outperformed by almost any high performance car.
@@explodifier6021 Yup, that was the grey area and why it was misunderstood.
Very true. A lot of misdirected hate towards the car. BMW obviously knew what they were doing and they certainly could have made it more powerful had they wanted to, but that wasn’t the point. Part of me is kind of glad that it was misunderstood because it allowed me to buy one 7 years ago at half price with only 5,000 miles on it. It’s a wonderful car. You can glide around town in electric mode and then go into sport mode and it becomes a different car. It may not be supercar fast, but it is not slow. The electric torque delivery makes it feel quite quick. I traded in an F10 M5 with 200 more horsepower, but the i8 feels quicker. Plus I got about 18 mpg in the M5. In the i8 I get close to 50.
😳 what on earth happened here, I definitely didn’t see that happening 😵💫.
Just love Casey’s old man moment, “my V8 sounds better…” 😂😂😂
Shitty drivers
Why would you expect a RWD vehicle to be at an advantage with an AWD with electric motors despite the HP advantage?
Great side by side comparison guys! TFL life!
This was an example of the advantage of turbos, and electric power, at high altitude. These cars perform about the same at sea level, but the i8 only lost half a second from its 1/4 time.
And with out a doubt that mustang has the base rear axle gears 3:15 and no launch control
@@gregzebrak4090 I don't think the axle ratio makes any difference at all with the auto. It shifts out of first by 40mph and chips 2nd immediately to 50mph. That's short gearing for a 500hp car, even though it weighs 2 tons. Maybe with the manual, but the manual is slower anyway.
Everyone on AutoTempest looking for i8s 😅😂
You didn’t find out the 10speed was quicker than the 6 speed manual. That was done by others back in 2018 if not earlier with the S550.
Really good job on the video format!!! It was very engaging and well broken down! Genuinely surprised about the i8
Ever since I was a kid. The i8 has always been a cool looking car to me. And to this day I still think it’s one of the best looking cars BMW has ever made!
I remember back in 2020 or 2021 TFL was trying to purchase an i8 via vroom but somehow the check was lost by Vroom (really cannot believe this thing actually happened). Now look at Vroom which no longer exists, lol. Congrats on the long due i8 again.
Wait, was that the "check chasers" episode where the check was missing?
BMW. The brand notorious for sandbagging it's actual horse power numbers. Worth calling out that the hybrid system is doing a lot of legwork in that drivetrain. I am sure it is helping a ton at altitude. Would love to see what this i8 puts down at the dyno.
I am blown away by the bmw i8 thats a 10 year old car against a 2024 car damm. I really underestimated the i8
@TheFastLaneCar- There should be no surprise, that a $150,000 vehicle, has a better interior, vs a $50,000 vehicle. To calculate power to weight more accurately, tq has to be included. Example: If the BMW has a combined Hp of 357, & combined Tq. Of 535, add together, then divide. So 892 divided by 2= 446 combined power output average, divided by weight. Then the mustang's 486 Hp, & 415 Tq.= 901 divided by 2= approx. the same @ 450.5 combined power output average, ( @ sea Level ), not to mention its 200 Lbs. heavier, + Rwd, vs Awd. I wonder how close these 2 vehicles would be in a 1/4 mile drag race, @ sea Level, on a properly prepped drag racing surface? I was surprised that the mustang had a shorter stopping distance. I was NOT surprised that the mustang sounded so much better. Great video. P.s. I just seen some drag racing video's showing a 2015 BMW i8, and a 2024 mustang Gt, 5.0 Liter, w/10 speed, ran @ the same Atco dragstrip. The BMW i8's best E.T. was a 12.55 @ 112 Mph, vs the Mustangs 12.15 @ 118 Mph!
That altitude is the real difference maker
10:00: That's a Roman word salad right there.
It take a 10 YEAR BMW to it close to the same Price as a New Mustang . But then you need to do the Repair cost to the BMW !
A 10 year old German car with such a complicated drivetrain is gonna turn into a money pit real quick.
@@Lakikano Yes If you own the BMW in for 4 years you could have paid for a New Mustang with the repair cost of of the BMW . Most likey it will cost you more than the New Mustang .
@@Schaneification other than the warranty for the first 6 years
Or just buy a 2023 840i XDrive with less than 15K miles for the same price as those (or almost 50% off the original MSRP) and still has a warranty. Almost 50% depreciation in just a year! 🙀
I just test-drove said 840i and am thinking about buying it. With a little negotiation, probably $47K!!! Looks much better than the Stang, is much more luxurious inside out, and just as quick.
For once I’m watching this video where these guys are about 2300 feet below me.
That Mustang GT would be a mid 14 second car here.
Race the gt500
Retest at sea level, then do another test at sea level with a intake tube and exhaust on mustang…
Both cars were raced stock from factory, and the i8 also has 10 years on the mustang with 40k miles on it. I'm sure it wouldn't make a difference anyways that mustang is heavy compared to the i8. Weight reduction may help out the mustang and an intake if you weren't going to do any mods on i8
Just like I said before, Mustang is like Superman - the all American hero that gets beaten in almost every episodes 😁🤣
The I8 needs the 3 cylinder Koenigsegg twin turbo engine. 😜
Three things, 1 excellent video guys, 2 that three cylinder sounds way better than I thought it would and 3 why would I pay so much for SoloDL when it's going to give miss information Lol!!!!
Crazy how 30.000 miles would knock a hundred tho off the price of a car! I was very impressed how bad it beat the Stang! I think the look of the beamer still looks bad a$$. I love the villian looking front end. But always remember that this is a wealthy person's car and up keep may be a little costly with all that tech. But damn she looks good!
Well, you've got a lighter car with two drive mode advantages that aren't as effected by altitude (electric and turbocharging) as a NA engine will be. Still, the Mustang as done well in all the drag races you've put it through, but like you, I don't think any of us were expecting this one to be so lopsided. I suppose it was bound to happen eventually! ;-)
Efficiency vs raw horsepower. VERY good demonstration guys. Efficiency always 🏆 wins. I would like to see the BMW go up against the Agera.
I was today years old when I found out the i8 has rear seats 😮🤦
For insurance premiums, same with a 911.
@@aussie2uGA yeah makes sense. Remember thinking the same thing when I saw the back seats in a Supra and a Lexus SC430
That’s why I don’t get the hate for turbos way more instant power!
That BMW is nice looking but the cost to repair it ( if you could find someone in the states to actually fix it) would be astronomical. IMHO
It’s lighter. Way lighter. The engineering in the i8 chassis super car level. It’s a gem.
Blue Oval for me!
11:26 kase Incredible outstanding job. You gave raw real moment The look on your face. Bro I want bear hug ya 😂Best part for me. Tommy and Andre Outstanding job as well.
The battery of the i8 is nearly empty ( only 3 miles left), nevertheless it beats the Mustang. Very underrated dreamcar.
All i can say u must be up there in elevation because my 2018 RS 3:6 camaro at sea level runs 13.6 107mph. I know the mustang GT runs 12’s at sea level. But that BMW is still a great buy very impressive.
Ford mustang
That bade Mustang GT auto comes with 3.15 gears. Maybe the optional 3.55's amd summer tires would jave helped with the launch and overall acceleration
I saw an i8 around town all blacked out and it literally looks brand new. I wish bmw would do a refreshed look and give it a v8. That would be a car!
The BMW i8 might have less HP (357) than the Mustang GT but it has more torque (420lbft) at lower rpm, which helps it achieve a faster launch off the line. The Mustang is also quite a bit heavier and only really gets moving when that 5.0L Coyote engine gets above 4000rpm.
I think the bottom for the i8 is about 50k. Not a bad daily driver either. Nothing turns heads for less money. Problem is reliability.
I8, Corolla GR or Fiesta ST, which is the best 3 cyl car for the money?
Would it be different at sea level?
That's why they mentioned elevation 6x during video
The 2025 Ford Mustang GT, GT performance pack and the Dark horse are more expensive. They also got rid of the high performance pack for the 2.3L four pot
What is the cost of repairs and maintenance on this BMW in the US?
Paying 150k for a 13 second car is outrageous. At 49k is a great deal. I'd be utterly disappointed if I had paid retail.
It's 10 years old... looks and interior go a long way
@@G82Watts So does servicing that BMW . FYI. That $150,000 BMW depreciated by 50,% The first year of ownership. That's a performance pack mustang GT with $100,000 in the Bank
Great video but it ain’t no TESLA !!
Just curious, but comparing Apples to Apples what was the performance of a Mustang GT back in 2016 at that elevation?
You dont need a trunk in the i8, the back seats are clearly for groceries, not people. 😂Thats plenty of space for daily use.
Can we have another TFL fleet update?
Yes
Best straightline deal on the market? You must not be looking at EVs. A used Kia EV6 GT goes for a bit over 30k and does 11s in the quarter.
Yes, mustang still a better deal.
@@joshc606 He said "one of the best straightline performance deals you can buy" around 0:30. If you metric is a) fast in a straight line and b) cheap then a muscle car on a tired old platform is not a good deal when a korean economy SUV can take 2 seconds on it in the quarter mile.
Can you guys please race your mustang and GR 86 special edition 😊
Is the gr86 tuned? lol because that’s not a fair race
@@HolaSoyJaydepends on the race...a drag race? Sure the Mustang all the way... on track? The gr86 would be better, especially with experienced drivers in both.
@@anthonyortega3136 that’s true but I don’t think I’ve ever seen a track day on this channel
Why would you be less excited on the launch
The german manufacturers always under rate their power & torque figures. There are tons of examples of them punching above their weight class.
High altitude and hybrid… a lot of the i8 comparisons from the time were at sea level.
If you want to flex and catch someone’s eye get the I8 but if you want a traditional v8 that will be a classic and will be special forever, mustang all day.
I'm sure the maintenance and repairs on the I8 compared to the Mustang are even also.....................................
yeah it is always heckled as slow but then its by people who dont own one. I love mine
I8 ran a 12.5@113 Mph in the 1/4mile per Car and Driver October 2016
Same as the motor trend numbers on the mustang GT 12.5
People consistently ran 12.2s but most magazine companies seemed to hit mid 12s. I watched one run a 12.1 with different tires
February 24, 2015 Car and Driver - BMW i8: 12.1 @ 116 mph., 3.6 to 60.
i8 looks cool and it's pretty quick but at 10 years old, how much longer will the battery pack last? How much would it cost to replace?
I'll take the Mustang.
7k if I remember to replace. Il upgrade mine to solid state when the time comes
i8 saving grace is the electric engine. Instant torque really helps out especially in high altitudes
The new ZR1 Corvette is nice, especially in convertible. Ford is dropping the ball. They should make a new mid engine Thunderbird to be the Corvette fighter. Ford GT is ridiculously expensive and v6, Thunderbird should be affordable and V8. Similar to Corvette.
I remember the reviews for the i8 saying the factory tires really let it down. It had Bridgestone ecopias or something. Does that one have better rubber on it? I wonder if the mods for the mini would work on the i8.
FYI: We put P Zeros on it.
I have Michelin ps4 on mine. Way better then the factory tires it came with.
I’m a speed demon, not an exhaust noise demon. I LAUGH at people trying to make electric cars some kind of pariah.
Yes, I like my own comments 🤦♂
I still dont understand the mini engine. That car deserved a proper M engine.
i8 is pretty quick indeed! but yea 150k new was too much for the performance lol like idk I bet you could get something like a 911 GTS for that price at the time
I can also buy a 2023 840i XDrive with 15K miles for $49K too.
Engine in the right spot makes all the difference...
Do you wonder how hard that is on the engine and transmission flooring it in multiple drag races?
Well they are both marketed as sports cars.
Considering the Mustang is handicapped by elevation and is stock, I'm sure the transmission is fine. As for the i8, it has 2 electric motors and a turbo 3... the transmission is fine here as well, lol
JESUS CHRIST THAT I8 BOOGIEEEESSSS
You ever thought about swapping drivers on a second run? Could eliminate diver skill
Does the mustang not have a launch mode ? If so did u use it ?
What's the rear diff ratio on the mustang?
Had an i8 sadly got rid of it when BMW stopped supporting it and stopped working on them! I have an ICE car again because manufacturers do not support EV's long term.
I feel like the i8 is not representative of most manufacturers support of EVs, considering it was a very rare car with bespoke components. Most modern EVs are built with shared components
@@justinbecker4772 Exactly right just like how my neighbor received delivery of his Fisker after a 4 1/2 year of waiting and they just went out of business and he said his vehicle needs service does not run and is also only worth 32% of its value on trade in 💀 I feel you don't understand EV's yet kid. My 2 year old low mile model Y is worth exactly 51% what I paid because the technology changed so fast they are literally worthless second hand. ICE still retains way more value and I sold many trucks for more than I paid two years later when using family discounts
@@user-bv3wo2qh1d lol, anyone who looked at fisker's books knew that company was doomed.
I rely on people like you to eat the depreciation so I can buy cheap EV's. Looking forward to my $35k Ionic 5 N in a year.
NA Mustang at altitude is a dud.
You keep talking about connection to Apple products, but can you connect to Android devices, or is it just Apple?
BMW I 8 runs a quarter mile in 12.50's
Literally no supercar racing a muscle car.... you can say sports car, but it's not a supercar.... that's like saying a lotus evora is a supercar, it's not.
To Roman, it’s a supercar.
I'd call the Evora a super car. Most (non car enthusiast) people think it's a Ferrari . That's usually a good indication of a super car in the eyes of the general public.
my FBO 2018 would walk away from this i8 HARD
I don’t know what loses drag races more…the mustangs or challengers? 🤦🏽♂️
The answer to the title of this video is YES!
I find it funny the reason I know about the i8 before it even came out is because the letter I in the number eight are very close together on a keyboard, and I was just randomly mashing the keyboard after BMW and input it i8 on accident and boy it was a Happy accident because that thing was cool
ComeOnMan......There's a reason why $150k car loses that much money. After the warranty is gone. So is your savings. I take the Mustang with a new car warranty.
Its insane how the i8 looks newer then most electric blobs being released today. Look at u tesla.
Bmw underrate their hp do a dyno test on the i8 youll be surprised how much hp that 3 cyl is making which is even more impressive
You were surprised???
You had to know the I8 is a 4 sec car
This is old news
Ya that is a base mustang. Put it against a dark horse or mach 1
357hp bmw is sickening that car from the factory should’ve came 600+hp especially for 150k
Why Ford hasn't included a electric motor/V8 combo is crazy... look at the C8 eray. Ford please take notes
Put some high octane in that stang
Wonder what the insurance costs for the i8.
Ford has to step up it's game
The BMW I8 could’ve been a seriously cool car If it wasn’t let down by the Power train
Yes, I wear my own pants...🤦♂️
Holy shit the mustang is closing in on 100hp a litre… that’s pretty impressive for naturally aspirated in my opinion.
With modern super- and turbochargers, there's really no reason to have naturally aspirated engines anymore. The Porsche 992 Turbo S makes 174 hp a litre...
@@xBrisreliability...
@@richfarfugnuven6308- the reliability is improving every year. Current turbochargers last well over 100,000 miles. There are F150s out there with 200,000+ miles on the turbochargers. My buddy has a dealership and is see the records of some serious high milers!
If you don’t learn & change with the times you start to sound silly with simple & much less relevant comments. The manufacturers don’t produce stuff expecting it to break down. They would all be out of business so to speak. Even Toyota is switching to turbocharging. They have a huge reputation they need to protect. Unfortunately the Tundras are failing at an abnormal rate for Toyota, but it has nothing to do with the Turbos. Do your oil changes, with the proper specified oils and turbos last very well. If you are not good at maintaining your vehicles, THEN a turbocharged engine may cost you, but that would be the owner’s fault for poor maintenance.
As the N\A engines become more complicated and more powerful, they also get less reliable.
@@Cloud30000 - exactly!!
Pretty sure the i8 was never considered a supercar. 3 cylinder engine and less than 400hp in 2015? Nah. Looks great though