Sanctions in Round 9 2024 - Did the MRO get it right?
Vložit
- čas přidán 28. 05. 2024
- Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @holdingthebull
A big thanks to........
austin
JustRandom [GD]
Benn Polomka
availingtuna
Ryan
Reroar
jon_redding2007 Archives
James Hicks
Today's video we take a look at a few incidents that were reportable offences in the AFL for Round 9 2024. What are your opinions on the matter?
Timeline-
00:00 - Introduction
0:15 - Sub - Sport
Great job on the slomo sound mate .. heaps better 👌
Intentional tripping should be a suspension straight up. How can a second offense only be a fine? It has potential to cause serious injury as anything, thought they tried to avoid that at all costs lol
How is Darlings contact different from those other ones weve seen this year where the player is just moving in that direction and a player gets collected. Not saying he should be suspended I just think weve seen similar stuff this year that was heavily penalised
im a pies fan, Darling was just standing there basically he couldntve done anything. he didnt deliberately try to hit him
@@FURNEX167 Im a Pies fan as well and I agree I just worded my comment poorly. I mean that incidents like this in previous rounds seemed pretty similar and yet they got suspended.
@@RiffRaffish thats okay no stress!, yeah i agree. im glad they didnt ban him even though i dont like west coast aha, i dont think the afl has a real case against this one though
Alex Neal-Bullen copped it vs Carlton. Poor him.
newman one is similar to the schultz one last week. low impact, but had the potential to cause harm and coming in that late and high should not be treated so lightly. a week at most for mine but still think schultz got off too easy
surprised Hinge didnt get anything
Poor Neal bullen
So you CAN concuss people and not have any reprocussions
How I'd rule each one:
Tom Atkins: No fine.
Jack Darling: 0 weeks.
Lachie Cowan: $500.
Jackson Prior: No Fine.
Marke Keane: No Fine.
Nic Newman: No Fine.
Scott Pendlebury: No Fine.
Jack Scrimshaw: 0 weeks.
Scrimshaws was soft
It’s a dangerous tackle and a suspension every day of the week. Stocker the saints players head hit the ground
Scrimshaws isnt a damgerous tackle
Toughen up Neal bullen
Shut up
scrimshaws is bullshit
Harley Reid tripped over and Scrimshaws one is soft and Darling should have at least got something if the AFL want to be consistent.
Did you not see pendles stick his foot out lol
@@Tosicc567he didn’t stick his foot out lol he tried to tackle him but reid slipped over and he’s complaining for no reason because he is a sook
@@King_Quackqua1 Literally watch the clip lol he stuck his foot out, idk how you can be gaslighting yourself so badly
@@Tosicc567 he slipped because he spun out of the tackle. I was playing that in slow motion and I didn’t see anything weird. He just slipped
@@King_Quackqua1 Nah you gotta be next level blind to not see him stick his foot out and clip the back of his ankle. If he didnt make contact he wouldnt have gotten fined lmao The clip shows him making contact and you're still arguing it. He literally gets out of the tackle and as he runs to the right of screen gets tripped over, unless he magically tripped on absolutely nothing? You can very clearly see the contact made by pendles foot to his ankle