ADOBE FIREFLY AI is here - Stop Everything You're Doing and Watch This!
Vložit
- čas přidán 20. 03. 2023
- Adobe Firefly AI brings amazing new functions. In my review of their Live Stream Announcement I show you what it can do. AI Vector Generation, AI Template Generation, AI color transfer, AI image combination, AI Text Generation. Adobe created some really smart ways to use AI in a professional Workflow. The Firefly AI will be integrated into the Adobe Products, so it can be easily used with Photoshop, Premiere, Illustrator and more. Also Adobe Firefly is Commercially Safe and trained on images that Adobe owns, has a license to or are public domain.
#### Links from my Video ####
Join my Facebook Group: / theairevolution
Adobe Live Stream: czcams.com/users/livec3z9jYtP...
Kris Kashtanova / history
Support my Channel:
/ @oliviosarikas
Subscribe to my Newsletter for FREE: My Newsletter: oliviotutorials.podia.com/new...
How to get started with Midjourney: • Midjourney AI - FIRST ...
Midjourney Settings explained: • Midjourney Settings Ex...
Best Midjourney Resources: • 😍 Midjourney BEST Reso...
Make better Midjourney Prompts: • Make BETTER Prompts - ...
My Affinity Photo Creative Packs: gumroad.com/sarikasat
My Patreon Page: / sarikas
All my Social Media Accounts: linktr.ee/oliviotutorials - Jak na to + styl
#### Links from my Video ####
Join my Facebook Group: facebook.com/groups/theairevolution
Adobe Live Stream: czcams.com/users/livec3z9jYtPx-4?feature=share
Kris Kashtanova twitter.com/icreatelife/status/1638217043919904786/history
👋
my question is, once firefly is out of beta, and all the training resources are either adobe owned, or public domain, will adobe charge license fees PER USE of images generated with their trained resources?
I'm still mind blown. We are officially living in the AI Age revolution
The picture-making service has been drastically devalued almost overnight.
Yes we are. Imagine where all this will be 10 years from now.
We are on the dawn
@@OlivioSarikas perhaps You may have already saw it. A little film in 1999. Something to do about 'The One'
@@OlivioSarikas a that pace i wondering in 1 years.... or in 100 ?
As an architect using auto 1111 the tool is crazy , it turns my crude sketches to something impressive yet more than what adobe is demonstrating here , thanks a lot your videos and your way of presenting things is quite inspiring and fun , but this still quite promising
Didn't expect a big wow-effect after all those established AI image generators... But Adobe really understands, how to bring this to the next step for professional purpose. Crazy.
yes i had same feeling
You obviously have'nt actually tried the Beta. It's worse than any AI I've ever tried, and I've tried them all. Adobe is great at PR. Not at AI.
Fantastic. I was waiting for that.
Fantastic overview of the capabilities. Thanks so much.
Can't wait to get my hands on it!!!
Thanks for the introduction!
I can’t wait to use this!!
I feel too much excited, can’t wait
Thanks for the summary. Sounds great.
My pleasure
Absolutely mindblowing. Now the neural filters of Photoshop looks like amateur comparing to this. 😮 Thanks for your video
This is the Evolution of Art! My work has been in the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston MA twice and I LOVE the AI Upgrade to my abilities! ChatGPT is a God's send too. There's still nothing wrong with being an Old School Traditional Artist either, all of these things can happily coexist.
Totally agree!
As a classically trained artist , and a writer, I couldn't agree more. It's a very exciting time to be any kind of artist. I'm hearing this from most artists.
"My work has been in the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston MA twice "
sure about that 🤭
@@xD3NN15x I think they'd be sure about something like that. Why don't you come right out and call a person a liar, rather than using snide little remarks?
@@elephantintheroom5678 you looked at his channel? there is nothing more to say ;-)
I feel like this is how AI art should have been introduced to the world, meaning the AI trained on images that the company actually owned. It's really interesting to see where this goes.
To be fair: Scraping the internet might not have been the best move, but was and is legal and all big internet companies have done it for decades
@@OlivioSarikas this is where it gets confusing, because I'm not 100% sure what those other companies did was legal. I guess we will find out with the GettyImages lawsuit.
I just want to be able to use AI art without issues lol, I'm sure you feel the same 🙂
@@amj2048 yes, that is the big question that still needs to be resolves or re-evaluated. However i can understand how these companies came to that conclusion if companies like google scraped and AI-analyzed these same images for decades
@@OlivioSarikas yeah true
@@OlivioSarikasThe question is whether or not they “owned” the images they used to train the models because of switching from Adobe desktop apps to Adobe cloud based apps where all their customers were uploading their creations and/or making them available to Adobe for their AI models to scan and learn from or not. The terms of service for many of these services has long been written in a way that would allow them to “own” your creations to the extent necessary to train AI models on while not being able to sell the works themselves, all while using them to create a product that can make a duplicate of your work without compensating you for it.
Some of these models have generated images that are so alike to someone’s original copyrighted works that the generated images even contained the original artist’s signature in their generated output. That’s problematic for artists, even if AI is actually a legitimate tool that can be used to create original art that does respect copyrights.
Great points, Olivio. Thank you for sharing your wisdom and insights.
my pleasure
Wow love the aspect ratio door opener .. gotten much better at taking care of that in camera but man cool 😊
Amazing! I did not see this coming.
Me neither :)
I think that's pretty mindblowing. Vectorimages, textgeneration, the combination with adobe's already great working tools like magic wand and the tools like changing the age or expression and their templates is pretty big
yup! that's one of the most powerful tools presented! just imagine to drop your PSD and start to "dAIsign" 😉
Most of it doesn't work. I tried it out yesterday and it was terrible. Worst AI I have evr tried.
The pre-alpha version of photopea with stable diffusion extension looks absolutely amazing!
Thank you, i will check that out
it looks really nice for an all in one tool that is super simple to use
Great video. Not sure why I needed to stop what I was doing, though, since I can't use the tool yet
Thanks Olivio. You have been an inspiration and guidance of A.I. arts!
Thank you very much
Next Level AI würd ich sagen. Der erste Eindruck ist schon recht überzeugend und im Vergleich zu anderen AI Programmen sehe ich hier einfachere und gezieltere Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten. Danke für das tolle Video Olivio 👌🏻
Find ich auch. Jedes Interface wurde hier speziell für den Zweck designed den es erfüllen soll. Das macht vieles einfacher
As an artist, I can tell you artists will not stop complaining about AI. Adobe being involved in it might make it worse. Adobe is why every program (aside from open source) has a subscription plan.
So true. The best thing Adobe can do with Firefly at this point is to include it in their Creative subscription - any attempt to upcharge or paywall this tech will just be another black eye for the company.
Well, there's Affinity nowadays and that's very cheap (one time pay) for the high quality. But I wonder if they can match this Adobe AI revolution with their software platform. I agree that the subscription plans are a pain in the a$$, but I think more and more creative people revolt against that monthly money grab. In the music (plug-in) business, you still have the choice to buy it parallel to a subscription plan. In the video editing business you have DaVinci Resolve with a very comprehensive FREE version.
The best thing adobe can do is lobotomize every artists and vacuum out all of the contents of both skull and wallet.
"I strongly feel that this (ai) is an insult to life itself.”
- Hayao Miyazaki
"People will come to love their oppression, to adore technologies that undo their capacities to think"
- Aldous Huxley
It removes alot of the legitimacy of there argument though the main complaint was "Theft" well can't complain about that anymore lol.. without sounding like a conspiracy theorist .
@@stealthbrandon that was some peoples complaint. The complain there is not eradicated - as other ai company’s have not stopped their theft (and shell game via non-profit data collection with for-profit software and products. )
Many many many people have had many many many other complaints against ai.
The theft was a minor issue that mostly illustrated how unethical its proponents and developers were.
Since i assume the theft argument carried little weight with you anyway, it changes basically nothing.
Miyazakis famous quote has nothing to do with the theft of vast copyrighted images - but in what ai was in and of itself:
"I strongly feel that this (ai) is an insult to life itself.”
- Hayao Miyazaki
His insight is entirely unchanged.
Mindblowing indeed
You r one of the great master in teaching graphics online. Thank god
Looks promising.I wasn't expecting much but I see some innovation there
Same
This is what I was waiting for.
Thank you very much! Impressive program.
My pleasure :)
awesome! the "legal AI training" is huge.
Amazing project
I wrote an article recently about the challenges of integrating AI into a professional work environment. Stating the pace of change, the lack of control, the difficulty with access, along with the ethics of sampling as serious considerations. Adobe and Microsoft look to be addressing all of these. It seems clear to me that all creative companies can now start planning their AI integration, incorporating them into their workflows.
i've got chatgpt for that lol (joking)
This is a game changer!
yes totally :)
very very impressed by this!
me too. I love the vecotr and template stuff
Thanks for all your great video's! I think that any professional artist should stay up to date with everything that's happening in their field. Creative people should also understand that they have an advantage over average people when working with AI, because they have an active and developed imagination, and thus more and better ideas about what they want and can achieve with these tools. The worst thing an artist can do is just sit back and watch it all happen, because then you'll quickly lose the head start that you now still have.
100% agree. Aritists need to get on this and use AI to it's maximum effect with their imagination, vision and artistic power
This is truly revolutionary.
Damn! Soooooo good.
Thank you, Thank you, Thank you!!!
you are welcome, welcome, welcome!!! :)
Wow! Finally! Do you know when it is availiable- and if all Adobe CC users will have access to it without paying extra? Thanks for another great video 🤗
Not sure. I really hope this will be part of the normal Adobe Creative Subscription. But it could just as well be that they make this part of Adobe Stock and you need to pay per use
@@OlivioSarikas Pay per use would be very "Adobe" indeed. A paywall would absolutely destroy its potential for most users, further eroding Adobe's reputation while pushing artists toward the use of free tools like SD. Here's hoping for a Creative subscription addition.
@@TMichael66 Adobe are not my tool of choice now. I want to own the software I'm paying for not 'rent' it .
Indeed, Adobe knows how to charge big bucks for their things. Even though the market now has a lot of different options of programs they are still market leaders and can set their prices accordingly.
Impressive !!!!!!
Thanks, Olivio!
you are welcome, my friend
10:00 The Puffin composition flies under the radar....this software is impressive
As soon as you said stop everything and watch this I thought I better! This could be interesting. ...wow! Now I've finished the video I'm excited! How could Midjourney compete with this level of control ? And it looked to be quite simple to use! Is it as simple to use as it looks in your video?
MJ really needs to step up their game. SD offers a lot of control. But not that specific and not integrated like that yet
Wow!
Wow Adobe took the best of the stable diffusion Workflows and integrated it in a nice way
And added some cool new stuff like Vector and Templates
This is too exciting!! Now I can't sleep 😅
No sleeping in AI times. There is always some news going on 😅
It's clear now that professional designers are going to adopt AI massively. This is no more about generating cool isolated images, it is getting fully integrated into software that will make them 10x more productive, the designer that doesn't use it will simply be labeled as "improducitve" for being slow.
I have several months of using AI for commercial design in a mixed way between photoshop and Stable Diffusion! in the right hand AI is an amazing time saver!
I do also and I work for a billion dollar company.
A lot of customers will do their ads by themselves..
@@atarox what's wrong with that? They are generally people who believe that they can do it because they consider themselves capable or just don't have the budget, that is not bad, these users almost always resort to Canva! they will not hire a designer even now, its just a target.
But as we have noted, AI can give you something terribly ugly or spectacular! you have to know what the hell you are doing, everyone can cook at home, but not everyone is a chef, bad taste is something difficult to change hahaha
@@jesuelm5482 I also do and I m making 0$ for my own company !
The important thing here is the Data set.Given that a majority of their user base are artists its a smart move to get that right on the get go.It would even benefit them to incentivize artists for example to contribute to that data set over time.
i'm sure they will do that or find a way to make it happen. They already have crowd sourced presets in Lightroom - and that's crazy good
Excited is an understatement!! This looks absolutely rad, and completely caught me by surprise. From first impressions it seems Adobe is getting so many things right - style transfer, inpainting, text to templates!! I can't wait to try this beta
I was stunned by it too. A lot of the ideas presented here are really cool and i hope the open source SD community will take note and add similar add-ons to A1111
Adobe announced Firefly, their new AI image generation product. This lends credibility to AI image generation in the creative space, as Adobe is a major company used by millions of artists, designers, and creators. It is also integrated into Adobe products, making it more accessible for its users. Additionally, this provides legal security for commercial use, as the models are only trained on public domain or licensed images. The software offers a streamlined interface with various options for different content types, styles, lighting and composition, built for professional use in the creative field. The software also offers the ability to mask subjects in an image through Smart Masking.
when i saw this title , i stop working , rush into washroom and open this video
Me too! :) Just had to make a second video today. This is just too cool :)
Thanks for your excellent content! This is quit distruptive even, I'd say. Also, somewhat unsettling.
Thank you. I am really amazed how smart the tools are they created. Let's hope they are as easy to use as they promissed
Can we use adobe firefly to fix hands generated by midjourney or other ais? I know some people use dalle-2 to fix hands and fingers, and have quite good results. just don't know if adobe firefly can do it too.
I completely understood that other AI Artwork Creation companies were balancing dangerously on infringing on the copyright of many artists by sourcing as base art their original art. If Adobe gets into AI deeply this will legitimise AI art creation and weed out all the cowboy AI creation companies and their illegal practices.
Thank You for this video. I have been lurking over the AI art industry for a while, never getting close because of the legalities of their practices. Now with Adobe entering….I can explore AI art fully.
👍
this is what random people (client) always thought how design and editing works and now we really at this point
Happy happy! Joy joy!
The fact that Adobe considers it important not to access licensed image data makes the new program even more interesting!
like cloning without full dna. we should all play with it
Thanks for reviewing Firefly. I wasn't up to date on that development. I'm too busy loving MJ 😉. I am not an Adobe fan for too many reasons to get into. That being said I've used Adobe products professionally since 1992 especially PS. If Adobe puts a MJ type interface into PS or other graphics programs that will be a game changer and a major "upgrade". It will be amazing to work with.
Regarding Adobe training their AI on "their" images so it's now (totally) legal: That is pure and unfiltered nonsense. How many artists and photographers do you think knew Adobe was using their work to train their AI over the past 10 years especially the artists and photographers who put their work on CC storage and extaspecially (I made that word up) on Adobe Stock and only got paid 33 CENTS on the dollar? THIRTY THREE CENTS!🤬 I would bet Zero %. So while it may be legal for Adobe to generate these AI images it certainly was not with their overwhelming disclosure and with approval of the artists and photographers (one in the same) they scraped. I'm all in favor of AI imaging but let's not make Adobe out to be the Messiah by legally referencing/training Firefly on "their" images.🤮🤮🤮
The power of AI grows every day! Soon it will be unstoppable.
ШИКАРДОС!!!!
I find it interesting that they are following the design path similar to Cmdr2's "Easy Diffusion", just a lot slicker and integrated. Without the control of the prompts, negative and positive like SD users have become comfortable with, this tool will be good in limited aspects, but lacking a lot of breadth of function. That's just from what I'm seeing so far. Needless to say, this is still impressive and intriguing in it's potential. Great video analysis.
I think they will add more functions over time. It's also not clear yet who this is focused at: the low-tech users, or the high-tech pros
@@OlivioSarikas Very true. As a graphic artist myself many of these tools would be a great help for me making ads and doing quick header graphics. I know their capabilities will improve, it's just when I look at how they've decreased from lots of the cool stuff they used to do in pre subscription Adobe products, I don't have high hopes for them getting too imaginative. What they focus on they will do well at and convenience will be very high. On the other hand, it's going to be a McDonald's menu level of selection. And you're right. It will be whom they target as a market.
companies can choose to "put the brakes" or "accelerate" when new technologies come up. ADOBE was on the risk of becoming obsolete, replaced by mid journey, or stable diffusion, but here from what I can see, they are reinventing themselves. Brilliant really.
10:42 Is there an extension for automatic to use an image as the color palette for the output?
Crazy times.
🔥🔥🔥
We need these kinds of functions in A1111 :P
Lots of people aren’t old enough to remember how when Photoshop came out boomers were saying to anyone using it, “you’re not an artist, the computer made your art.” Seriously that’s literally what most people said about Photoshop. All my young Gen X artist friends said “don’t tell anybody i use Photoshop!”
Adobe has seen this exact same outrage before. They have history to tell them which horse to back.
Adobe (and art) are both gonna be just fine. And while the haters scream and cry into their 40s, then 50s, the generations younger are going to call them out of touch.
This is absolutely amazing; I REALLY hope this will be a part of Adobe's subscription
i hope so too
Question.. after I've filled in the 'Access' Box I don't get the access Mail, why? I can't get in. Iz frustrating.
Is it included with subscription??
the art world is getting a lot more interesting
or a lot less
Are these run locally or cloud?
The problem is that adobe has no perpetual Licence. To pay a subscription fees for something I would rarely use is a no go for me
Good thing for Adobe there are successful professionals. I'm happy to pay to receive frequent updates and new features, as well as the use of related software in my subscription bundle. My clients like what I produce on that software and they give me money...much more than the subscription fee.
nice!!!
Why would they announce a closed beta to their general customers? It's meant for a small test group, not millions of people
@@OlivioSarikas Well, I already sent my request! that old behance will help me to be able to try it sooner haha!. This is very interesting for me as a designer I have been using AI for design (as a tool) since December and also following your videos! thanks for that content! also, Have you seen the partnership with nvidia?
YET ANOTHER JAW-DROPPING set of innovations! And grudging kudos to Adobe - they will continue basking in the sun. On a minor ornithological note - the bird was a Puffin not a Penguin - but hey if its AI it could be a Puffguin!!
Can't wait to see what they are doing next. I really hope they will do this right, and not F it up by greed and corporate decisions.
If we can use custom models with it I'm all in
Finally a decent UI
We are democratising the design industry at rapid speed. 10 years ago I worked 40 hours a week making posters and ads. Clients can now just create posters themselves by chatting with the ai. So of course it is amazing technology but please let us just be honest about the fact that it also will just eliminate a lot of jobs in the lower budget sector.
The world is changing before our very eyes, it's amazing what we can do now.
and here's the thing:
It's NOT slowing down, and it's never going backwards!
Buckle up!
With all things Adobe and why I don't use their products, how much does it cost?
Looks like Affinity will have to catch up quickly with AI and vector tracing to keep up.
My thought exactly! I wonder if they can. I really hope so!
They do offer very interesting features but I only support software that is a open source or a one-time purchase, I don't support subscription based programs which is all what Adobe does, hopefully we see some of those features in Stable Diffusion.
While that is true, the Adobe Sub is rather cheap for the massive value you get in return and they constantly update too. i remember when Adobe Suite was not subscription based and it cost several thousand dollars to buy. Now any small designer can just sign up with a small budget and use everything. Plus the sub is paid by their customers, not by the designer
its nice but how much $ will it cost?
As a newspaper cartoonist I used Adobe programs. ❤
The big A - always somewhere in the pipeline of creative works
They homogenized the process, and now it's the industry standard. It won't be long until open source UI processing will follow this simpler model.
Some of this doesn’t sound quite right the way you described it, at least the way most image AI’s work. I don’t think they are making vector images. I think they must be bitmaps that they are then “vectorizing”. This is technology they already have for outlining. The way deep learning AI works they are just picking the next pixels that should appear in the image - this can not produce vectors. Same with their templates. They are combining other technologies to do this. But still very cool. What will DiVinci do?
they might indeed be vectorizing, but they seem to be doing it in a smart way by, probably, generating a bunch of layers and making each a group.
I'm describing the result, not the process. Their own Video says it's a Vector output. Also: AIs don't create images, the vae decoding turns it into images. Before that it's latent information. And i see no reason why there shouldn't be a AI that can turn latent into vector
Seems to me a vector image is a vector image, regardless of how it was made. Vectorizing already existed but nobody has yet combined it with generative AI. Pretty cool.
My Adobe subscription is waiting for this from Stable Diffusion day1
It's still just a design tool. No use as final execution commercially. Max image size 2000px x 2000px and they don't specify the resolution. Midjourney already does this and creates much better images judging by Adobe's promo video. I was hoping the final resolution/sizes would be large enough to be of use commercially.
Was it announced somehow before? I have Adobe subscription and learn about it now and need to submit request to join beta program. Are there no more companies with a good business model?
It was just announced to the public today. It's been top secret until now.
Looks pretty cool. Adobe aren't wasting any time.
They have been at this for quite some time. Just not publicly :)
@@OlivioSarikasthey showed a early Version of this early this year at Adobe MAX
Well I don't want to be disabled. But it can be made possible (stable diffusion in blender) because it's open source most of the time, isn't it
Good point!
editable files???
can I create images in adobe firefly and sell in adobe stock image?
I don't see why not. They are made for commercial use. unless of course they have the same licensing as Adobe Stock Photos, in which case you wouldn't own the images. I will ask
Style transfer is something I'd love to play more with. Like say, give me 80% Spider-Man with 5% ninja turtle and 15% Pikachu.
me too. runway has that too by the way
Adobe are imo the biggest threat to open source art tools, and to artists who aren't wealthy.
I'm all for companies building and selling tools. But adobe is so bad about buying up tech and locking it away to force you to rent, not own, their services that they have a chilling effect on the software industry. Boycotting them as an artist is almost as difficult as boycotting google as a person who wants to use the internet. Monopolies should be resisted.
Ok, i'll get off my soap box :)
yeah adobe went to subscription and one day I could open any of my files unless I "subscribed" I lost it and swore never to deal with them again. and I havent missed a nights sleep over it since. I will NEVER deal with them again and ive been around since photoshop 1.0. ive never felt so abused and insulted.
Of course they are, but Adobe never was open source. So there is no overlap to open source tools
@@OlivioSarikas The overlap is that they purchase tools ,many of which were open source, and then close source them. It's legal, but not at all cool.
Just like it's legal to charge a monthly fee that ends up costing far more than if things were available for a one time purchase. but also not cool. Art should be open to everyone, not just those who can afford hundreds of dollars a year for one silly feature that some company has decided to work hard to make sure no one else can reproduce.
@@jameshughes3014 There's no lack of competing open source tools out there for artists to use. They're not always as slick but they do exist. If you want quality, sometimes you have to pay for it. Regarding the subscription model, you're not just getting static software; you get rolling updates and new features, plus related software included in the bundle. Other licensing models exist so if Adobe isn't for you, you're free to shop elsewhere, but the subscription works great for a lot of people. True artists must suffer anyway. Their art is better than mine because they have to struggle with a ridiculous UI some generous soul created in their off time.
Just one snarky note: Penguins can’t fly but puffins can. Leaving my sneakiness, I’ll add really helpful and interesting video and thanks!
as an artist not on the AI hate train, I have to say you do forget that alot of freelance and even industry artist actually hate adobe for its years of anti-consumer practices and would probably only see this as another step towards this. I doubt its going to make any artist already mad at AI less so. Its limited training data set while hopefully more ethical, also makes it much harder to use for varied cases without good proficiency in the AI. A good artist is likely to just draw it themselves at that point or use the generation for reference.
Doesn't matter about the haters. They will get left behind. They are vocal now but will become less and less relevant. Their days are marked and they know it which is why they are crying so loudly.
What this Adobe does is get professionals onboarded faster as pros don't have time to work out the workout of a less than ideal interface such as Automatic1111 along with the concerns of data of unknown provenance. At least until the courts decide on the matter.
Adobe knows this is the future and has been doing "neural" tools for some time. I laugh at history repeating itself regarding the progress of tech and the effect on creatives. We adapted when Photoshop and graphics tablets hit the scene, and other digital tools that many whined about as not having 'soul' and the human touch. If people want to continue doing things the way they are doing them now, that is their choice and more power to them, but if they think they will be just as in demand and be able to compete with those taking advantage of advancing technology then nobody can be blamed but them if things don't go their way. Adapt or die the saying goes.
@@roybatty2268 “youll get left behind”
sounds like scripted sales propaganda.
Are you sure you’re not a mind controlled drone?
Every ai enthusiast wallows in this condescending anger against art and artist. Claiming superiority and that they value it while treating it like toilet paper commodity.
covetous of people with actual talent.
bitter.
And joyous for instant gratification, because gaining skill might require something of them.
You adopt this, you will fall behind.
the future is corrupt
Well it certainly isn't shutting up artists yet. I saw the same news on a photo channel, not an AI content channel, and half of the comments were of the type "how can we stop this?! THEFT!!" etc.
It's interesting news for sure but given how cheeesy Adobe's AI attempts have been so far I'm a bit skeptical. But let's hope that it'll be great.
Yes, some people will never learn - or take more time to adjust. I feel sorry for everyone who is left behind, because they think this is just a fad that will go away
No exporting photos to RAW formats yet though??? As a portrait photographer and someone who’s into AI portraits this is what I’m waiting for!
hm... good point. maybe in their own DNG format though. however, the question is if AI can create something worth a RAW if they are mainly trained on 8bit jpegs. Would be interesting to see a model being trained on raws specifically
Yeeeeeessssss🎉❤😅
The Wale has arrived :) Now no artist can say "it's not art"