@@christophergraham8191 it is literally impossible for this to replace actual design. This really can only be used as a tool to SUPPORT real design. A robot cannot capture the creativity and soul of an actual person
@@Rasheedgames companies don’t care about soul, they care about profits and saving money. Who needs a designer, illustrator or photographer when you can use AI. This is only the start. Give AI a few years and tell me again how it was just a tool for creatives when it’s wiped out entire sectors of the creative industry.
@@christophergraham8191 the customers and consumers will 100% care when everything looks the exact same and bland. Human designers will make things that stick out and draw attention and profits. Trust me, this will not take away any skilled jobs from anyone. It may replace the people making horrible quick designs for $10 an hour but people who have honed their craft and developed real talent are completely safe and secure. This will wipe out the super low skilled jobs at worst. You're severely underestimating human sensibilities and capabilities
@@christophergraham8191 I don't think "A.I." means what you think it means, if there's no existing database to pull images from or if there is no internet, the so-called A.I. doesn't do anything.
So many people are so excited about all this AI art, and other AI like chat gpt and so many more... Have we all forgotten "The terminator", "The matrix", and so many more? AI is coming for the creative jobs right now, but the rest is coming, and it'll be here sooner than you think.
This is so amazing and existing! I really don’t understand all those who say graphic designers will be out of work. Adobe just providing a much more powerful, better vehicle but it still needs a driver and that’s where graphic designers come in. I see it as an amazing powerful tool to create and deliver projects, better and faster… much, much faster . IA is a very capable assistant not a competition.
the thing is it creates oversaturation every fucking 12 years will try to get a job at Pixar or whatever company and no one will give a fuck about your 1000000 billion generated dragon that a billion people made before you .....the tools are grate until you need a skill to use them your work generates value to society in case when everyone can do that thing whitout any skill or knowledge its just not profitable anymore....
@@HumanTouchArt I understand your point, but isn’t it the point of evolution and expansion? Certain professions and occupation, either disappear completely through the evolution process or change and adopt to survive, I believe the role of a graphic designer will just going to change, but I don’t believe that computer can ever replace creativity and vision of a human being.
It's amazing, but at the same time I think that it makes Graphic Design seem "easy" for someone who may not have the skills or true talent to create using these programs, possibly making Graphic Designers who have the skillset and love for Design have less value in the market.
@@Yourleftismyright88 i understand your point, but it’s the same with Photoshop, people just think there’s a ‘magic button’ which will instantly make your picture beautiful when in reality it is hours of work for a skilled retoucher. Same here. The quality of work will always speak for itself and talent will never goes unnoticed. Mid journey and others are incredibly powerful tools but not perfect and still will need a human graphic designer to perfect it.
Nice overview. Thanks for taking the time to post this. Just a clarification: A.I. already exists in Adobe (and other) software and has for some time. A.I. is artificial intelligence (as you already know) and encompasses a myriad of products. You're speaking about text prompt generated image creation and the like. 2:34 I completely disagree with this: Adobe claims to use only "their" stock images and "public domain" images to train their models HOWEVER if you ask any artist/photographer who has submitted to Adobe Stock I think you will find that 90% of those contributors had no idea Adobe was using their images for that purpose. Sure it may have been buried deep in their TOS but is that really ethical and helping artists and content creators? Now, when you attach that along with the fact that Adobe only pays artists 33-35 CENTS on the dollar FOR THEIR WORK you will begin to realize Adobe is ripping off artists for their own financial gain as they always have. Those same artists have to pay for their subscriptions and most likely make a zero sum gain when all is said and done. Before everyone jumps on the "Adobe is so ethical because they only use (their) own images..." Just remember whose images and content those really are and how Adobe operates. So, once again as they did with stock photography taking away from the commercial photography market they are now doing with illustrators and content creators. They use all of their work to train their models and give them nothing back in return. There's also a concern as to whether they used images loaded on CC cloud also. Ethical? I think not🤮 I'm all for A.I. as a creative tool but only when all the cards are laid on the table and not some P.R. nonsense about Adobe taking the moral high ground and caring about copyright, artists and all that bull. The only thing Adobe cares about is Adobe and their quarterly earnings. ☢
@@dannyg8032 Are you suggesting Adobe is doing something illegal? I highly highly doubt it. If they took artwork from artists I’m sure they had to agree in some TOS or small print somewhere.
Dope!! I’m so on the fence about AI art and how we differentiate between human made art and AI generated images. But I like this application. These are areas where you wouldn’t want to hire a human for a hand crafted piece anyway. Can’t wait to try it
The copyright you mention only starts after the image generation. What about the copyright issues used to generate the image in the first place. Just slapping a ‘generated with ai’ message means nothing
This is fabulous - I have been trying out MidJourney, BlueWillow and others but as a longterm Adobe user it will be invaluable having Firefly built into Photoshop suite. Im using it more as inspiration, trying ideas for web, graphics, ad banner design, almost like an assistant bouncing ideas
It's still just a design tool. Yes, there are a few new differences and uses within other Adobe apps but still no use as final execution commercially. Max image size 2000px x 2000px and they don't specify the resolution. Midjourney already does this and creates much better images judging by Adobe's promo video. I was hoping the final resolution/sizes would be large enough to be of use commercially.
I hope there will be a way to enter specific seeds and other parameters, like with S-D. I don't like the "take whatever it gives you" selection of 4 random seeds. I like more control than that. Will this tool have a competitive level of control as in A1111? Or is it just a simplistic "type in something and happily use whatever the robot gives you" for the smooth brains?
- What I am interested in knowing is that if Firefly can make clipping easier like what's being shown on this video or users still has to do it manually in Photoshop/Illustrator or was it all for show? - On the content credentials, you spoke about Adobe's concern using other people's content. However it only shows what app was used in creating the image, in this case Adobe Firefly. How about the creators' names who made the images that the program drew from? I have to disagree that this is your unique individual artwork, because without those regurgitated images you wouldn't have any artwork to claim at all. - can it create decent hands? from this demo, the hands are still wack! I can see this work and impress non-professionals and hobbyist, but how can you convince design professionals like myself? Just for kicks I've been using several AI platforms since mid 2022, there's a lot of improvement in Firefly but nothing those other AI's can't give. Sell me more.
You can see it with all the image generating artificial intelligences. If they don't have learned from any photo, how for example a mouse looks like as a captain on a boat, it's hard to create a photorealistic image of it. Of course, the more the y learn the better it will be.
Since I’m paying they better upgrade some things. Most welcome creation of Adobe since discovering the content calendar scheduler inside of adobe express.
I just signed up for the beta, . I'm on the fence. does this enhance or kill creativity in terms of creative skill? I'm curious how I could use this to make initial reference or cleaned up sketch images to use in my traditional mixed media work. will a.i help improve lighting and shadow reduction of video? Things like that make me curious. or to combine individually created art elements into one seamless piece. certainly this tool is at least ethical compared to those other web scraping ones.
It's not necessarily a bad thing, but it's definitely going to rock pretty much every industry...and be a weird next decade unless our dumb governments decided to blow everything up. I like the idea of using AI for inspiration, and quick variation creation/iteration. I like that you can train it based off of your own designs. That will be a great tool for quick iterations and variations. And glad you guys are thinking about consent, copyright, etc. But man.... I gotta say......using generators doesn't feel like creativity to me. Kind of leaves you feeling deflated. It's like outsourcing your visual creativity/production to a machine. Every time I do it, I'm pretty amazed/excited by the results....while simultaneously feeling like I'm cheating/uninvolved/and ultimately unsatisfied....cause I didn't have to work at all for it. The speed/rarity of something created often times is what generates the value/meaningfulness of said thing. Like.....if I make something cool in 10 seconds.....it's not nearly as meaningful or fulfilling as something I spent days working on. This is gonna completely obliterate that. Again.....not NECESSARILY a bad thing but who knows what that will do... I think we'll see the value/meaningfulness of all "digital" forms of art drop significantly and the value/meaningfulness of physical art increase. At least until we put AI into humanoid robots. That's when things really hit the fan.
Maybe, you hope. the value of everything in the physical world has been ruined by the existence of the digital world. get people offline more often and maybe you will be correct. but as long as we remain cyber junkies. Physical anything will be meaningless.
where are they getting the art or photographs that they are using to generate the finished product? Someone created the art or took the photos. Are they getting permission for that? Are they giving credit to the original creators?
Okay, are "we" sure we are using the term "A.I." in the correct way? Is PS and AI really "giving" different variations, or are they searching a database of already created stuff and then performing a "mash-up"? As cool as it is, FireFly and Chat GPT are not self aware, neither of them works without a internet connection or a pre-existing database of resources to pull from...
they are not self aware - but they are making tons of decisions and “learning.” a tool would give you a pencil and you would guide its marks. With ai you ask it for a picture, and it makes the decisions on how to make the image on that prompt. This is why it is NOT A TOOL. It is a step in the wrong direction. No it is not self aware. But it is making decision and choices. It is thinking for you. even artists using it only for concept and ideation note this. if they dont know what they want then theyll type in some prompts and see what the ai generates. These new choices and decisions are something new. It is thinking for them. And this thinking for them will vastly improve and increase. and theirs will decrease
So now we shall have AI generator taking a jobs of hard working artist by using their techniques and artistic inventions to make more money to corporations. People will eventually stop to create art on internet or keep it on paper for private art collectors and this art generators will create a lot of "seen before" variations of graphics... Evolution of the art will stop and this digital crap will be more like "yet another great mice, yeee". F*** boring.
justine bateman said recently that we will see the death of art in our lifetime. all scripting, animation, fx and acting will be ai in the very near future. I know doctors worried about ai. Its gonna be a disaster
soon itll replace videographers, and editors, and 3d artists, and writer…. and then the audience as well and no one will be needed as consumers either!!! its awesome
not a good comparison. ai is far more disastrous. the printing press replaced copyists…. ai will replace authors. Listen to this asshole impressed at himself for ai’s response to a fucking prompt. My lord. Its tragic
Adobe is in a unique position to use it's power and influence over the creative industry to control what content is made on their applications and in their cloud. ... do we really want that? Give it all to Adobe to control and dictate?
Apply Now Thank you for your interest in Adobe Prerelease programs. Please note: Participation in Adobe Prerelease programs is subject to the evaluation and approval of the Product team based on current testing requirements. You will be notified once your application is approved. Adobe Prerelease Team Why do you want to participate in this prerelease program? (Maximum of 250 characters) Here is what i write..
So much for that art degree and 20 years of illustration experience... Now if only we could do this for potential boyfriends. Hey Cortana, make me a man! Wait, what? No! That's not what I meant! Aah crap.
@@richard_robert we stopped cloning, knowing it was unethical. We shamed google glass by calling its users glassholes. We dont pass out heroin to teething babies anymore. Or give college students and hysterical women lobotomies to calm the nerves. Ai doesnt have to be adopted. we can reject it. this inevitability is not an excuse for adoption. its a sales pitch. because the billion dollar companies behind it want your dependency
Yea, greedy Adobe cut my paid over $500 CS6 suite off, even stopping the actual disk loading. They ask me to locate the seller, knowing it's hard to locate out-of-business resellers with who Adobe at the time DID register my software from the seller back then. Some were blaming Windows 10 later finding out it was Adobe that wants everyone to get on the CC paid subscription, especially after Adobe went public stock market made them unreasonably aggressive. Adobe doesn't care about making enemies, only $$$ money. Actually, they did me a favor because it forced me to try and learn other programs like free DaVinci resolve that I eventually paid for the Studio version and perpetual easier up-to-date Ai programs like Filmora, Affinity Photo, ''Luminar Neo from Ukraine'', inPixo, and a host of others. These programs may not have longevity user support established like Adobe Ps, AE, and Pr yet, but I'm very satisfied deleted all that I can with Adobe's name off of my computer, and encouraged as many as I can to do the same, and will never ever look back, use or buy Adobe again. Sorry for the rant but Adobe got me F*Cked up.
TBH I'm kind of happy I don't have to deal with designers anymore soon, especially in edits and stuff. Just give me a sketch and step out of the way! Love it.
@@untilco I'm being a bit pessimistic here but I think Adobe's long-term plan is to keep moving into the Canva space where they can create easy ai generated art and design tools for the masses with a more accessible subscription model. Essentially cutting out the middleman, the creatives themselves who supported and financed their business from the start. I could be wrong, but the Canva numbers speak for themselves.
@@daveread4969 I'm a designer and I work for two different companies that pay for Canva. The dynamic is that they write the content and what they want to say, but as a designer, I prepare it aesthetically. The companies can't do it on their own, even with Canva available to them.
@@untilco It's not about "creatives", it's about those who have MONEY. Those with MONEY will have the advantage, because they will have the steady income to KEEP PAYING subscription fees to keep their tools operational. If someone ends up out of work, they won't have regular income to pay for the tools that could get them out of poverty. The rich will get richer, the poor will get poorer. Subscription plans needs to GO!!!!!!
I don’t know why these people put such immature, non-creative text into the AI the second he started saying mouse in the navy blue I was like this is a freakin dork, and clicked off, everyone always uses animal,
Adobe needs money money & money... Here is subscription,, oh sorry you need another subscription, oops here is another new update and need money for upgrading...
Yes, they are greedy parasites, who enslave the digital art community to keep making income to hand off to Adobe for subscription fees to keep the tools operational, so that can keep feeding Adobe subscription fees.
That's like saying Canva will help desiners, not replace them. it will replace 9/10 designers. When a customer can go to a website, specify their needs and get 20 possible examples, designers are no longer needed. Basically canva on steroids. Already happening, designers here are already getting fired and being replaced by AI. I think that looking at it as a tool that will help designers and not replace them, is wishfull thinking.
@@VoidscaperE thats just the beginning. The creepy old dude three doors down will be able to generate ai porn of your daughter from one social media photo and a single sentence prompt consisting mostly of four letter words. Middle school students have already been caught deepfaking their principal saying racist comments. Artists will lose to speed and efficiency and standardize aesthetics. no. adopting it is not an option. each prompt trains IT more on how to replace you. it is not a tool for you. You are a tool for it. People will say: adopt it or fall behind. But thats a fear based sales pitch. Adopting it makes you dependent - because IT is doing work youre not doing anymore. You will think less, learn less, try less, and develop less. Adopting ai IS falling behind.
I'm always so amazed at the creative space. So excited for the artist/creator community.
Ĺlllllĺĺĺllĺĺlĺĺ😢
this will really change the way designers work. cant wait to try it myself
Yeah, they won’t have work.
@@christophergraham8191 it is literally impossible for this to replace actual design. This really can only be used as a tool to SUPPORT real design. A robot cannot capture the creativity and soul of an actual person
@@Rasheedgames companies don’t care about soul, they care about profits and saving money. Who needs a designer, illustrator or photographer when you can use AI. This is only the start. Give AI a few years and tell me again how it was just a tool for creatives when it’s wiped out entire sectors of the creative industry.
@@christophergraham8191 the customers and consumers will 100% care when everything looks the exact same and bland. Human designers will make things that stick out and draw attention and profits. Trust me, this will not take away any skilled jobs from anyone. It may replace the people making horrible quick designs for $10 an hour but people who have honed their craft and developed real talent are completely safe and secure. This will wipe out the super low skilled jobs at worst. You're severely underestimating human sensibilities and capabilities
@@christophergraham8191 I don't think "A.I." means what you think it means, if there's no existing database to pull images from or if there is no internet, the so-called A.I. doesn't do anything.
Finally an ethical AI generator!
So many people are so excited about all this AI art, and other AI like chat gpt and so many more...
Have we all forgotten "The terminator", "The matrix", and so many more?
AI is coming for the creative jobs right now, but the rest is coming, and it'll be here sooner than you think.
The mice are absolutely spot-on!
This is for sure something I’m looking forward to. I can just imagine how much it will speed up my workflow.
YEAHHH!! 🔥
☝️☝️Hit up got something for you🎉........
ʜᴇʟʟᴏ 👋 ғᴀɴ ᴄᴏɴɢʀᴀᴛᴜʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴs ʏᴏᴜ’ᴠᴇ ʙᴇᴇɴ sᴇʟᴇᴄᴛᴇᴅ ᴀᴍᴏɴɢ ᴛʜɪs ᴡᴇᴇᴋ ᴡɪɴɴᴇʀs ᴄᴏɴᴛᴀᴄᴛ ᴍᴇ ᴏɴ ᴛᴇʟᴇɢʀᴀᴍ ғᴏʀ ʏᴏᴜʀ ᴘᴀᴄᴋᴀɢᴇ 🎁🎄☝️☝️
This is so amazing and existing! I really don’t understand all those who say graphic designers will be out of work. Adobe just providing a much more powerful, better vehicle but it still needs a driver and that’s where graphic designers come in. I see it as an amazing powerful tool to create and deliver projects, better and faster… much, much faster . IA is a very capable assistant not a competition.
the thing is it creates oversaturation every fucking 12 years will try to get a job at Pixar or whatever company and no one will give a fuck about your 1000000 billion generated dragon that a billion people made before you .....the tools are grate until you need a skill to use them your work generates value to society in case when everyone can do that thing whitout any skill or knowledge its just not profitable anymore....
@@HumanTouchArt I understand your point, but isn’t it the point of evolution and expansion? Certain professions and occupation, either disappear completely through the evolution process or change and adopt to survive, I believe the role of a graphic designer will just going to change, but I don’t believe that computer can ever replace creativity and vision of a human being.
It's amazing, but at the same time I think that it makes Graphic Design seem "easy" for someone who may not have the skills or true talent to create using these programs, possibly making Graphic Designers who have the skillset and love for Design have less value in the market.
@@Yourleftismyright88 i understand your point, but it’s the same with Photoshop, people just think there’s a ‘magic button’ which will instantly make your picture beautiful when in reality it is hours of work for a skilled retoucher. Same here. The quality of work will always speak for itself and talent will never goes unnoticed. Mid journey and others are incredibly powerful tools but not perfect and still will need a human graphic designer to perfect it.
finally AI for images with good usability!
Nice overview. Thanks for taking the time to post this. Just a clarification: A.I. already exists in Adobe (and other) software and has for some time. A.I. is artificial intelligence (as you already know) and encompasses a myriad of products. You're speaking about text prompt generated image creation and the like.
2:34 I completely disagree with this: Adobe claims to use only "their" stock images and "public domain" images to train their models HOWEVER if you ask any artist/photographer who has submitted to Adobe Stock I think you will find that 90% of those contributors had no idea Adobe was using their images for that purpose. Sure it may have been buried deep in their TOS but is that really ethical and helping artists and content creators? Now, when you attach that along with the fact that Adobe only pays artists 33-35 CENTS on the dollar FOR THEIR WORK you will begin to realize Adobe is ripping off artists for their own financial gain as they always have. Those same artists have to pay for their subscriptions and most likely make a zero sum gain when all is said and done. Before everyone jumps on the "Adobe is so ethical because they only use (their) own images..." Just remember whose images and content those really are and how Adobe operates. So, once again as they did with stock photography taking away from the commercial photography market they are now doing with illustrators and content creators. They use all of their work to train their models and give them nothing back in return. There's also a concern as to whether they used images loaded on CC cloud also. Ethical? I think not🤮 I'm all for A.I. as a creative tool but only when all the cards are laid on the table and not some P.R. nonsense about Adobe taking the moral high ground and caring about copyright, artists and all that bull. The only thing Adobe cares about is Adobe and their quarterly earnings. ☢
Thanks to all the artists who laid the groundwork for this! It’s so cool we can use all your work for free this way, 😊
You mean steal them
@@mikug ? Im sure this is all legal and all the licences from the artists were respected!!!
@@brentschmogbert yeah sure:)))
@@dannyg8032 Are you suggesting Adobe is doing something illegal? I highly highly doubt it. If they took artwork from artists I’m sure they had to agree in some TOS or small print somewhere.
@@mikug well then it’s ok. Adobe is a well respected company.
Dope!! I’m so on the fence about AI art and how we differentiate between human made art and AI generated images. But I like this application. These are areas where you wouldn’t want to hire a human for a hand crafted piece anyway. Can’t wait to try it
very cool... currently using midjourney! Love that Adobe is jumping into this space
Which program do you like better and why? Thank you!!
🎉 Thanks for sharing! Can't wait to try this. I am applying now...
The best user experience so far
the ai is the user. you are the tool. wake up
You explain it very well!
Thanks so much!
The copyright you mention only starts after the image generation. What about the copyright issues used to generate the image in the first place. Just slapping a ‘generated with ai’ message means nothing
This is fabulous - I have been trying out MidJourney, BlueWillow and others but as a longterm Adobe user it will be invaluable having Firefly built into Photoshop suite. Im using it more as inspiration, trying ideas for web, graphics, ad banner design, almost like an assistant bouncing ideas
It's still just a design tool. Yes, there are a few new differences and uses within other Adobe apps but still no use as final execution commercially. Max image size 2000px x 2000px and they don't specify the resolution. Midjourney already does this and creates much better images judging by Adobe's promo video. I was hoping the final resolution/sizes would be large enough to be of use commercially.
no. Its the artist. You are the tool.
I hope there will be a way to enter specific seeds and other parameters, like with S-D. I don't like the "take whatever it gives you" selection of 4 random seeds. I like more control than that. Will this tool have a competitive level of control as in A1111?
Or is it just a simplistic "type in something and happily use whatever the robot gives you" for the smooth brains?
- What I am interested in knowing is that if Firefly can make clipping easier like what's being shown on this video or users still has to do it manually in Photoshop/Illustrator or was it all for show?
- On the content credentials, you spoke about Adobe's concern using other people's content. However it only shows what app was used in creating the image, in this case Adobe Firefly. How about the creators' names who made the images that the program drew from? I have to disagree that this is your unique individual artwork, because without those regurgitated images you wouldn't have any artwork to claim at all.
- can it create decent hands? from this demo, the hands are still wack!
I can see this work and impress non-professionals and hobbyist, but how can you convince design professionals like myself? Just for kicks I've been using several AI platforms since mid 2022, there's a lot of improvement in Firefly but nothing those other AI's can't give. Sell me more.
☝️☝️Hit up got something for you🎉........
ʜᴇʟʟᴏ 👋 ғᴀɴ ᴄᴏɴɢʀᴀᴛᴜʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴs ʏᴏᴜ’ᴠᴇ ʙᴇᴇɴ sᴇʟᴇᴄᴛᴇᴅ ᴀᴍᴏɴɢ ᴛʜɪs ᴡᴇᴇᴋ ᴡɪɴɴᴇʀs ᴄᴏɴᴛᴀᴄᴛ ᴍᴇ ᴏɴ ᴛᴇʟᴇɢʀᴀᴍ ғᴏʀ ʏᴏᴜʀ ᴘᴀᴄᴋᴀɢᴇ 🎁🎄☝️☝️
You can see it with all the image generating artificial intelligences. If they don't have learned from any photo, how for example a mouse looks like as a captain on a boat, it's hard to create a photorealistic image of it. Of course, the more the y learn the better it will be.
Adobe took the very right step 👍
thanks for the video
This is insane!!! WOW
Ah man great video, thank you!
Amazing 🎉
Just a clarification: A.I. already exists in Adobe products and has for some time. You're speaking about text prompt generated imaging.
☝️☝️Hit up got something for you🎉........
ʜᴇʟʟᴏ 👋 ғᴀɴ ᴄᴏɴɢʀᴀᴛᴜʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴs ʏᴏᴜ’ᴠᴇ ʙᴇᴇɴ sᴇʟᴇᴄᴛᴇᴅ ᴀᴍᴏɴɢ ᴛʜɪs ᴡᴇᴇᴋ ᴡɪɴɴᴇʀs ᴄᴏɴᴛᴀᴄᴛ ᴍᴇ ᴏɴ ᴛᴇʟᴇɢʀᴀᴍ ғᴏʀ ʏᴏᴜʀ ᴘᴀᴄᴋᴀɢᴇ 🎁🎄☝️☝️
He said "absolutely bananas" which is the new non-metric measuring system for 2023.
Is this built in on Illustrator? My struggle is to export the firefly image into illustrator. It puts Firefly logo etc.
Nicee! 🔥🎵
Since I’m paying they better upgrade some things. Most welcome creation of Adobe since discovering the content calendar scheduler inside of adobe express.
Thanks for the upload really great alpha!
Glad you like it!
I just signed up for the beta, . I'm on the fence. does this enhance or kill creativity in terms of creative skill? I'm curious how I could use this to make initial reference or cleaned up sketch images to use in my traditional mixed media work. will a.i help improve lighting and shadow reduction of video? Things like that make me curious. or to combine individually created art elements into one seamless piece. certainly this tool is at least ethical compared to those other web scraping ones.
Waiting bigtime for my Beta invite!!
Hi , can we use text effect for print on demand? Is ther any problem with the copyright ?
When I saw his arms tatooes, I tought it was an AI effect
AI is getting where we couldn't expect.
It's not necessarily a bad thing, but it's definitely going to rock pretty much every industry...and be a weird next decade unless our dumb governments decided to blow everything up.
I like the idea of using AI for inspiration, and quick variation creation/iteration. I like that you can train it based off of your own designs. That will be a great tool for quick iterations and variations. And glad you guys are thinking about consent, copyright, etc. But man....
I gotta say......using generators doesn't feel like creativity to me. Kind of leaves you feeling deflated. It's like outsourcing your visual creativity/production to a machine. Every time I do it, I'm pretty amazed/excited by the results....while simultaneously feeling like I'm cheating/uninvolved/and ultimately unsatisfied....cause I didn't have to work at all for it.
The speed/rarity of something created often times is what generates the value/meaningfulness of said thing. Like.....if I make something cool in 10 seconds.....it's not nearly as meaningful or fulfilling as something I spent days working on. This is gonna completely obliterate that. Again.....not NECESSARILY a bad thing but who knows what that will do...
I think we'll see the value/meaningfulness of all "digital" forms of art drop significantly and the value/meaningfulness of physical art increase.
At least until we put AI into humanoid robots. That's when things really hit the fan.
Maybe, you hope. the value of everything in the physical world has been ruined by the existence of the digital world. get people offline more often and maybe you will be correct. but as long as we remain cyber junkies. Physical anything will be meaningless.
And humanoid robots are a bad idea, we will have to ban those. This "high tech future" stuff needs to be throttled, big time.
Feels like applying a text mask in Photoshop would be faster and prettier
great so i can focus more on my hobbies :)
Cool stuff! How long will it take for Adobe to apply this around video work flows?
not long. then they will apply it to a nee target audience and wont need artists anymore.
where are they getting the art or photographs that they are using to generate the finished product? Someone created the art or took the photos. Are they getting permission for that? Are they giving credit to the original creators?
Are they going to integrate with Figma too or phase it out?
Okay, are "we" sure we are using the term "A.I." in the correct way? Is PS and AI really "giving" different variations, or are they searching a database of already created stuff and then performing a "mash-up"? As cool as it is, FireFly and Chat GPT are not self aware, neither of them works without a internet connection or a pre-existing database of resources to pull from...
they are not self aware - but they are making tons of decisions and “learning.”
a tool would give you a pencil and you would guide its marks.
With ai you ask it for a picture, and it makes the decisions on how to make the image on that prompt.
This is why it is NOT A TOOL. It is a step in the wrong direction.
No it is not self aware. But it is making decision and choices. It is thinking for you.
even artists using it only for concept and ideation note this. if they dont know what they want then theyll type in some prompts and see what the ai generates. These new choices and decisions are something new. It is thinking for them.
And this thinking for them will vastly improve and increase. and theirs will decrease
dope 🔥
So now we shall have AI generator taking a jobs of hard working artist by using their techniques and artistic inventions to make more money to corporations. People will eventually stop to create art on internet or keep it on paper for private art collectors and this art generators will create a lot of "seen before" variations of graphics... Evolution of the art will stop and this digital crap will be more like "yet another great mice, yeee". F*** boring.
justine bateman said recently that we will see the death of art in our lifetime. all scripting, animation, fx and acting will be ai in the very near future.
I know doctors worried about ai.
Its gonna be a disaster
This is huge
Amazing! What about video and 3d?
soon itll replace videographers, and editors, and 3d artists, and writer…. and then the audience as well and no one will be needed as consumers either!!! its awesome
It’s like when power tools became available and all the carpenters lost their jobs
not a good comparison. ai is far more disastrous. the printing press replaced copyists…. ai will replace authors.
Listen to this asshole impressed at himself for ai’s response to a fucking prompt. My lord. Its tragic
Please tell me, WHERE is this Adobe Firefly?
What are some free apps that have similar features to this?
Do we know if Adobe is going to gonna try and monetize this separately from other apps until its integrated into existing CC apps?
i imagine it will be on Adobe Stock, maybe with a little extra payment
wow, simply amazing
Glad you think so!
What is the final resolution of these images?
Nice 👍
is adobe firefly ai images copyright free ?
We are all out of work... time to go to plumbing school
I find it hard to pay for something and then have my creativity, my expression be throttled by being told what I can or can't create.
Intellectual property laws are going to have to change. We can not go on with the current greedy legal model.
Adobe is in a unique position to use it's power and influence over the creative industry to control what content is made on their applications and in their cloud. ... do we really want that? Give it all to Adobe to control and dictate?
Getty partners with Adobe, meanwhile, Getty sues Stability.
The big guys want it ALL!!!!!
Is it unlimited free?
Nice
Apply Now
Thank you for your interest in Adobe Prerelease programs.
Please note: Participation in Adobe Prerelease programs is subject to the evaluation and approval of the Product team based on current testing requirements. You will be notified once your application is approved.
Adobe Prerelease Team
Why do you want to participate in this prerelease program?
(Maximum of 250 characters)
Here is what i write..
And After Effects is still slow as hell. Maybe they will ask AI to improve it ;)
Can I sell it in adobe stock
❤
What is the resolution of the generated images?
Good question, my guess is 512x512p for square format, possible upscaled to 1024p. So probably useless for any large format printing.
So much for that art degree and 20 years of illustration experience... Now if only we could do this for potential boyfriends. Hey Cortana, make me a man! Wait, what? No! That's not what I meant! Aah crap.
"thanks" Adobe for contributing to the unemployment of creative professionals ..
Love it or hate it, AI is gonna stay.
@@richard_robert I know, I hate it
@@richard_robert we stopped cloning, knowing it was unethical. We shamed google glass by calling its users glassholes. We dont pass out heroin to teething babies anymore. Or give college students and hysterical women lobotomies to calm the nerves. Ai doesnt have to be adopted. we can reject it.
this inevitability is not an excuse for adoption. its a sales pitch. because the billion dollar companies behind it want your dependency
Yea, greedy Adobe cut my paid over $500 CS6 suite off, even stopping the actual disk loading. They ask me to locate the seller, knowing it's hard to locate out-of-business resellers with who Adobe at the time DID register my software from the seller back then. Some were blaming Windows 10 later finding out it was Adobe that wants everyone to get on the CC paid subscription, especially after Adobe went public stock market made them unreasonably aggressive. Adobe doesn't care about making enemies, only $$$ money. Actually, they did me a favor because it forced me to try and learn other programs like free DaVinci resolve that I eventually paid for the Studio version and perpetual easier up-to-date Ai programs like Filmora, Affinity Photo, ''Luminar Neo from Ukraine'', inPixo, and a host of others. These programs may not have longevity user support established like Adobe Ps, AE, and Pr yet, but I'm very satisfied deleted all that I can with Adobe's name off of my computer, and encouraged as many as I can to do the same, and will never ever look back, use or buy Adobe again. Sorry for the rant but Adobe got me F*Cked up.
Adobe plrerelese Team
Why do you want to participate in this prerelese program?
Here is what i write?
Guys, It's amazing adobe is doing that, but they need to run to catch MidJourney.
or avoid ai like the plague even
cool but look at the hands of mouse
Cool feature, definitely going to try it out
You should!
hahah.. good luck
TBH I'm kind of happy I don't have to deal with designers anymore soon, especially in edits and stuff. Just give me a sketch and step out of the way! Love it.
even on the mouse AI still can do hands 😆
Bro this shit is stable diffusion with 90% of it's features cut down and it's nto free you have to ensalve yourself to adobe
How awful is this for those who want a career in the creative business. It’s a short step from here to mass unemployment.
@@untilco I'm being a bit pessimistic here but I think Adobe's long-term plan is to keep moving into the Canva space where they can create easy ai generated art and design tools for the masses with a more accessible subscription model. Essentially cutting out the middleman, the creatives themselves who supported and financed their business from the start. I could be wrong, but the Canva numbers speak for themselves.
@@daveread4969 I'm a designer and I work for two different companies that pay for Canva. The dynamic is that they write the content and what they want to say, but as a designer, I prepare it aesthetically. The companies can't do it on their own, even with Canva available to them.
😂 if you don't adapt to using this technology as a tool you won't keep up. It's not going to take jobs stop crying wolf.
So before this release...creatives was OK to use Ps ?
@@untilco It's not about "creatives", it's about those who have MONEY. Those with MONEY will have the advantage, because they will have the steady income to KEEP PAYING subscription fees to keep their tools operational.
If someone ends up out of work, they won't have regular income to pay for the tools that could get them out of poverty.
The rich will get richer, the poor will get poorer.
Subscription plans needs to GO!!!!!!
Amazing, but still can't generate normal looking hands 🤷♂
Traduzir portugues
I don’t know why these people put such immature, non-creative text into the AI the second he started saying mouse in the navy blue I was like this is a freakin dork, and clicked off, everyone always uses animal,
Creativity is dead.
over acting 🙂
Adobe needs money money & money...
Here is subscription,, oh sorry you need another subscription, oops here is another new update and need money for upgrading...
USELESS
I hate Adobe,
Yes, they are greedy parasites, who enslave the digital art community to keep making income to hand off to Adobe for subscription fees to keep the tools operational, so that can keep feeding Adobe subscription fees.
Yes,
they are
gree
dy para
I feel like at this point AI will help designers work faster, not replace them.
That's like saying Canva will help desiners, not replace them.
it will replace 9/10 designers.
When a customer can go to a website, specify their needs and get 20 possible examples, designers are no longer needed. Basically canva on steroids.
Already happening, designers here are already getting fired and being replaced by AI. I think that looking at it as a tool that will help designers and not replace them, is wishfull thinking.
@@VoidscaperEnobody asked you, just like your mother.
@@VoidscaperE thats just the beginning. The creepy old dude three doors down will be able to generate ai porn of your daughter from one social media photo and a single sentence prompt consisting mostly of four letter words.
Middle school students have already been caught deepfaking their principal saying racist comments.
Artists will lose to speed and efficiency and standardize aesthetics.
no. adopting it is not an option. each prompt trains IT more on how to replace you. it is not a tool for you. You are a tool for it.
People will say: adopt it or fall behind.
But thats a fear based sales pitch.
Adopting it makes you dependent - because IT is doing work youre not doing anymore. You will think less, learn less, try less, and develop less.
Adopting ai IS falling behind.