Principles of the American Revolution | Constitution 101

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 7. 08. 2024
  • Take a look at three key principles of the #AmericanRevolution: natural rights, popular sovereignty, and rule of #law.
    Jeffrey Rosen, president and CEO of the National Constitution Center, examines the text of the Declaration of #Independence and the historical context that influenced the thinkers of the Revolution.
    #Constitution101
    This video is part of the NEW Constitution 101 course and curriculum.
    Teachers, check out the "Principles of the American Revolution" unit of the full 15-week curriculum: constitutioncenter.org/educat...
    For the self-guided course and related videos, visit: constitutioncenter.org/the-co...
    For more educational resources on the American Revolution, click here: constitutioncenter.org/educat...
    Visit our media library to discover more online classes, podcasts, and Town Hall conversations: constitutioncenter.org/intera...
    Subscribe to the National Constitution Center on CZcams: czcams.com/users/Constitu...
    Follow the National Constitution Center on social media!
    Facebook: / constitutionctr
    Twitter: / constitutionctr
    Instagram: / constitutionctr
    Sign up for our newsletter: visitor.r20.constantcontact.c...

Komentáře • 16

  • @tomwilson7806
    @tomwilson7806 Před rokem +1

    Outstanding series, explained in laymans terms by a knowledgeable scholar!
    Thank you

  • @josephkelly2190
    @josephkelly2190 Před rokem +4

    As our current government violates every principle and rule of the constitution, what do we do now?

    • @suntzu6122
      @suntzu6122 Před 7 měsíci

      The tree of liberty quote.

  • @khanhminhnguyen7274
    @khanhminhnguyen7274 Před 11 měsíci

    Thank you 🙂

  • @johnwilletts3984
    @johnwilletts3984 Před 6 měsíci

    It’s often forgotten now, but the Patriot Movement started in Parliament back in 1725 as a branch of the Whig Party. They began as a counter to political corruption, but then later pushed for parliamentary reform in the light of new ideas. These men pushed for new ideas on Civil Liberties, Democracy and Free Enterprise. My home town of Rotherham Yorkshire was Patriot. On a hilltop overlooking the town stands a monument to the Boston Tea Party built in 1775 called Boston Castle. Not far away at Parlington Hall Yorkshire stands a massive Victory Arch built in 1783 to mark the Patriot Victory. Right at the centre of London stands a statue of George Washington. Monuments like these exist because the Patriots were to win politically in Britain. In 1782 the Whig Lord Rockingham was invited to become Prime Minister he agreed on the condition that he be allowed to set America Free. Fighting against the colonies stopped the moment he came to power but continued against the other belligerents until the peace treaties of 1783. One of the ironies of the conflict was that the new USA moved to the Tory Right, whilst Britain itself moved towards the Patriot Left. In 1825 the Patriot Party renamed itself the Liberal Party and so still exists in parliament to this day. British Patriots were to be very disappointed in the American Constitution, describing it as more Tory than the Tories! They did not like that slavery was built into the constitution. They did not like that the vote was restricted to just the white property owning class or just 6% of the population. However many of the these British Patriots are remembered today in the names of American Countries, Cities and Warships. Examples from my home town of Rotherham:- Lords Rockingham and Effingham.

    • @straxfear
      @straxfear Před 3 měsíci

      Where in US Constitution something about slavery and "just white minority "?

  • @dr.debbiewilliams
    @dr.debbiewilliams Před rokem +1

    What happens when a person doesn't reason to full capacity?

    • @pgpc6448
      @pgpc6448 Před rokem

      We get to vote them out!

  • @taconobaka1688
    @taconobaka1688 Před rokem +1

    And there in lies the problem. We were born into this Government, our very births treated as though we have consented to be governed by the United States. Now, it's true that we could always renounce our citizenship and go elsewhere, but there's a couple problems with that. 1) you can't legally enter most other countries without a passport showing your citizenship (I can't really name any where this is possible off hand). 2)You may not be able to afford to go anywhere else. Travel costs money. If you don't think so, ask the refugees crossing over our southern border how much they were FORCED, as in at gun-point, to pay to be let through. Most countries require you to have a certain level of wealth or at least have already secured employment before they let you legally immigrate.
    Now, I'm not some kind of Sovereign Citizen and I loath making an argument favorable to them, but forced consent is not consent at all.
    The second problem is with Popular Sovereignty. What if, more or less, half the population believes the government is no longer holding up it's end of the contract and they believe they have, not just the right but, the duty to alter or abolish the US government regardless of what the other half thinks? And lets be real here, it's more like a third vs a third, because too many people can't be bothered to care, either because they have more existential problems or it just doesn't matter to them...until it's too late and they find out it actually does. Or maybe they believe there are no options with their best interests in mind.

    • @straxfear
      @straxfear Před 3 měsíci

      you can't legally enter most other countries if you have non--American or non West passport .... And we lost American Password power with Obama - Biden administration

  • @dr.debbiewilliams
    @dr.debbiewilliams Před rokem +1

    What about women? He said all men. What about us?

    • @taconobaka1688
      @taconobaka1688 Před rokem

      History. Rewrite it at our peril. "He who controls the past controls the present. He who controls the present controls the future." Orwell, _1984_
      I believe it's the 19th Amendment and some Sex Equality legislation (AKA, altering the Government to correct for an abrogation of it's social contract with the people) that corrects for this oversight when the document was written.

    • @josephkelly2190
      @josephkelly2190 Před rokem

      I would think we are past gender and racial barriers

    • @straxfear
      @straxfear Před 3 měsíci

      In Constitution was nothing against women.. In New Jersey women had that rights from 1776 - that states matter