Part 2 - Comedian Claims He Defeated Every Argument Against Gun Control
Vložit
- čas přidán 31. 05. 2024
- Steve Hofstetter guns
bit.ly/2CHLudt
Part two of my video debunking the video, "Defeating every argument against gun control"
In that video, comedian Steve Hofstetter made a video where he claimed he defeated every argument against gun control with a total of 23 points.
Here is Part 1 if you missed it • Comedian Claims He Def...
I decided to make my video to retort all 23 of those points.
Because the gun debate is far more intricate than a 15-minute video, and there's so much to unpack, I decided to break my video into five parts.
So, this is part two addressing arguments six through ten.
Argument 6 - The government would confiscate all guns if they could just get away with it is not true. The only laws on the books that enable confiscation are red flag laws. There is absolutely no boogeymen that are going to go house to house to confiscate your guns.
Argument 7 - What guns you have are more than just your own business.
Argument 8 - Registration takes gun purchases from an honor system to an easily trackable crime. Registration makes sure the buyer and the seller are both responsible for following the law instead of hoping they will be.
Argument 9 - Hitler didn't make people register guns. When he got into power they relaxed the gun laws.
Argument 10 - Criminals won't follow the law but It is difficult for the average person to buy illegal things without getting caught and gun control would make it more difficult, which is a good thing.
Steve Hofstetter & others who are pro gun control are entitled to their views on gun control issues. Please always be respectful to others including Steve Hofstetter and their views whether you agree with them or not.
FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.
USCCA Concealed Carry Insurance
www.mrcolionnoir.com/go/uscca/
GUNS ARE ESSENTIAL Merchandise
➡️ bit.ly/2XxJxbT
Keep America Tactical Merchandise
➡️ bit.ly/2VQnFFR
If I Only Had One Concealed Carry - FREE Book
➡️ www.mrcolionnoir.com/start-here/
To Order Your PRO 2A Hats Click Here:
➡️ shop.mrcolionnoir.com/collect...
FOLLOW ME ON:
Twitter - / mrcolionnoir
Instagram - / colionnoir
Facebook - / colionnoir
#GunsAreEssential - Zábava
Here is a link to Part 1 if you missed it czcams.com/video/AVJ0SkahgQQ/video.html
This guy's a joke, and it's still not even funny. He went viral once for being heckled and he handled it so poorly, all the comments were shitting on him for being a total puss. Plus he's a ginger, he has no soul XD
Watching Steve on a comedy stage is like watching Peter Dinklage on a basketball court, Caitlyn Jenner on the masked singer, or AOC in a congressional hearing. No matter how hard they try, they'll never be any good at it. Add arguing for gun control to Steve's list along with handling a heckler.
My personal argument:
We have had 130 years of increasing gun measures being implemented, there is yet to be a single example of gun control working positively in the favor of the people across the world and through history...
Repeating the same experiment with the same variables while expecting different results is the definition of insanity.
BTW...Australia still has those problem Obama...
Massacres of Australia, before and after the "Buyback"
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_massacres_in_Australia
Gun Laws help no one but Government and Criminals, leaving good people defenseless. Criminals dont care about law and Government thinks they are above law, law only applies to the people that follow and obey it. Criminals continue to break the law regardless of what laws are written. People with intent to harm others will still harm others no matter what sign is put out front or what measures are taken...CA, WA, OR, NV, NM, CO, and FL have the strictest Gun Control measures implemented...Chicago City is a "Gun Free" City in a heavily regulated State and they all still have the same issues after implementing those "common sense gun controls"...a continuous rise in murder/crime. There isnt a single example anywhere in the world at any point in time where gun control made a dramatic positive change for the people, it has only helped criminals and government.
In the USA where 400 MILLION Firearms are in the Hands of 100 Million Gun Owners (1/3 of the US Population) you would think that there would be more than 12,650 of Deaths by firearms per year (excluding suicides), especially when most household and daily use objects kill many more times the amount of people per year. Most of that 12,650 Deaths are from Gang on Gang Violence, Police Kills, and Accidental Deaths, less than a 3rd of those deaths are from Legal gun owners using them against others and there isn't a single Law that could be imagined that would actually change it for the better but the legislation proposed and implemented creates defenseless victims adding to those numbers as criminals prey on those that cannot defend themselves. 100,000,000 of 400,000,000 Armed and less than a 3rd of 12,650 deaths attributed to those that obey the law - that percentage is insane when the media constantly floats "Gun Violence" (nonsensical term) so often. Hammers, Fists, Knives, Chainsaws, Toothpicks, Cosmetics (Make-Up), Food, Cars, Alcohol, Smoking all kill many more people per year than all firearms combined and Doctors are the 3rd leading cause of Death in the USA (250K) but you don't see any of the movements the firearms industry sees to ban them or regulate/restrict them.
What is also crazy is that people think police should have firearms and not gun owners, they fear gun owners but studies have shown that firearm permit holders are 30% more law-abiding than the police. Guns save 250K-3 Million people per year in defensive use against violent crimes (Rape, Muggings, Robbery), many times not even firing a shot.
A report of prisoner interviews in 11 states, said that 40% of all those interviewed had not committed a crime "on at least one occasion" because they saw a gun. They had then decided to not commit the crime they had intended because of the increased risk. If that is not crime prevention, and proof of guns saving lives I don't know what is.
Is there any other object that SAVES so many people per year? That takes such a small percentage of lives? That is as demonized as firearms? Now on to Mass Killings, these people are MURDERERS...and murder is against the law, yet they are still doing it, they use all types of methods to commit these atrocious behaviors but when its not firearms its usually not reported by the media.
There have been 38 Mass Killings with Knives alone since 2006 and the average death count is much higher than the average death count of firearm-related Mass Killings. There are many more with Bombs (Already regulated heavily and Illegal to own without permits), cars, baseball bats, and other objects but when have you seen a report within the USA about these Mass Killings? There is a agenda and a narrative, whether you believe so or not, there is no other reason for the selective reporting of information. They paint a terrible picture on the media that certain guns are worse than others, some are "military assault weapons" (false made up term). They say the AR15 is one of them but the AR15 is not military and nor does it have select fire. Its a tactical looking hunting rifle and have been used in just a handful of Mass Killings, most are committed by handguns and rifles that shoot no more than 5 rounds before reloading. The firearm isnt important, the persons intent, mental stability, and nature is, especially when every Mass Killing has a trend that can easily been seen if you look. All Mass Murderers have been medicated with Psychotropic medications, have mental instability issues. They go to areas with little resistance (Gun Free Zones) that are largely populated, why restricting the access of more people to firearms will only lead to more defenseless victims.
Magazine Limits only effect those that obey the law, meaning criminals (murder/assault is already illegal btw) will ignore them and use them anyway no matter what laws are implemented. Magazine restrictions only reduce the chances of a law abiding citizen surviving a deadly scenario as each bullet is a chance at defeating a criminal or murder and limiting those chances is asinine. A person who isnt breaking the law should be able to have what ever they like to defend themselves, no matter how crazy it sounds to anyone else - it is their Right outlined by the Constitution. Are people really that inept where they think people that commit mass murder care what a politician decides to say or sign in to law? Do you think criminals look up what laws they need to follow up until they decide to commit a crime? What is wrong with public servants today - you are supposed to be helping and working FOR the people...not against them. There isnt a piece of legislation that will stop evil people from doing evil things and that is why we need to be armed and ready as that is the only way to ensure safety whether you agree or not. I hear alot of crazy quotes from officials like "why do you need more than 10 rounds?", have they not wondered how accurate people are under stress or fear during a attack? They will miss atleast a handful of shots and the shots the hit the attacker may not even effect them - 10 rounds may be enough for one attacker but what if there are 2? 3? What if they are on PCP/Drunk or on other drugs? You are just creating scenarios where a person is limited in surviving and their life may be saved if they could carry the standard 17 round magazine or more if they would like. You are doing more damage than good with gun laws, an average of 250,000 to 3 million people are saved every year by using their firearms for defense, many times not even firing a shot.
What happened to America? Why is it that it's perfectly acceptable to punish good people for the deeds of bad people whenever firearms are involved but not elsewhere? Could you imagine the outrage if you told folks they could no longer purchase pain medication because SOME people abuse them and die from overdoses. Oh and the hordes of people would lament and demand their meds and they would be told "surely you can do without those drugs because even if it saves just one life, it's worth it". Oh the people would be outraged and it's not even a Constitutional RIGHT to take prescription drugs.
I mean, that's just one random example but you get the point. Why are good, law abiding citizens of the United States of America having their God given rights stripped away based on the actions of a handful of evil people? It makes no sense whatsoever, yet they call it "common sense" go figure.
@@John-X fr, this guy is so shit at comedy
@@Raymo2u you
wrote
a wall
of text
and i
didn't
read
a single
word
of it
\(◠‿◠)/
America: "we need to make sure terrorists don't get weapons"
Also America: Leaves 85 billion dollars in military equipment in taliban controlled Afghanistan.
Well the dumbasses in charge are not "we the people". There are a ton of us who hate where our leadership has gone.
you mean the corrupt government cause the "regular people" have no control over what they do until we start forcing them to stop being tyrants like the second amendment is there for to begin with cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force not by talking to them or voting etc like that
@@FH-cn3mg but the problem is we dont do anything to actually stop them which is force like the second amendment intends cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force not by voting or talking to them etc like that
PREACH IT
@@gcart7675 well back then in 1800s maybe we could've fought the government. but i was in the army from 2014-2018. if civillians tried today we would lose like 5 hours max 😂 u.s military is o.p compared to rifles and stuff.
"There is absolutely no boogeyman going from house to house confiscating your guns." Katrina. New Orleans. Literally door to door gun confiscation.
and by one of the most corrupt PDs in the nation!
This ☝️
I can’t stand when anti gun people straight out lie. We here in Canada have a “safety Minister” who publicly lied about facts regarding guns and gun ownership. He went as far as calling law abiding gun owners “violent extremists”. Repeating that statement makes me sick to my stomach. This is a public figure!
@@peterc970 that’s a disgrace
@@peterc970 so if law abiding gun owners are violent extremists... what does that make the politician who takes his citizens ability to defend themselves from criminals..?
I love his argument: last time we failed to confiscate your guns, therefor it’s proof that we are not trying to confiscate your guns.
Seeing the guns being destroyed is making me literally sick to my stomach
Same.
Pretend they're all made by Vulkan Arms, Bryco, and Jimenez. Makes it a little more bearable
Ik shit makes me cry bro.
They should have said ffffffuck NO!!!!!........ Bullets FIRST
It happened back in ‘97 in the UK and so many guns that belonged to servicemen that fought and died for our country and passed down to their descendants were DESTROYED. I am British. We lost our right! Keep fighting.
Somebody please tell this dude that it’s called the “bill of rights” and not the “bill of things I agree with”
It isn't the" Bill of Privileges", either.
That clown would seize other's stuff if given the chance. Don't let them take anything.
The people that think the way this "comedian" does, usually hold the belief that the constitution and bill of rights are outdated documents that need to be completely repealed and rewritten.
or "the bill of things I want to cancel because they hurt my leftist feefees"
This is the Same Socialist agenda the A=ldobrandini Family of LUISS University and O=rsini Family used with Hitler to Destabilize the Population on itself during ww2,, It was coming from the Social Engineering standpoint and not from its leaders, But the leaders were playing along with the Institution standpoint,
LUISS R-alph -P-ercy A=lesandro O=rsini L-ee R=osenberg h=owards A_ldobrandini F=arnese LUISS Thinktank !!!
Gun control is a circular argument: "Gun laws reduce crime, but all of our existing gun laws aren't reducing crime so we need more gun laws that don't reduce crime."
Gun laws necessarily creates more crime where there wasn't any.
gun control is the only thing thats failure is used as proof that it works and we need more.
gun laws are on the books expressly for the government and mega corporations to commit more crimes. why? because your weapons get in the way of their imperialism. wait you thought it's only against brown people in the middle east? LOL, no they must also imperialize within their borders too to ensure they have full control of the populace.
@@HorkSupreme The same could be said of any law.
@@spongeintheshoe That's true, so then we need to examine whether the purpose of a law is achieved, if it disproportionately negatively effects law abiding citizens, and whether it has some moral basis.
For gun laws the said purpose is to reduce the amount of deaths through violence. From what I've seen the deaths in the gun category move to another category when a restriction or ban is placed and that's if it changes at all through criminals not being able to access guns.
Which, if they are criminals, don't care about doing so legally because that's what makes them criminal. So it didn't really solve anything because it's not looking at the reason why such killings occur.
But what about other effects of such a law? Now law abiding citizens are stripped of the ability to defend themselves with a particularly effective weapon. Effective in the sense that anyone can use it, so a feeble person can defend themselves against a strong attacker.
Those citizens that wouldn't have done criminal activity are now claimed that they will unless they give up their weapons. It's a witch hunt, irrational accusations of wrong doing are tossed about because of fear on no basis of fact.
Killing was already illegal, covering the supposedly purpose of gun bans so why continue to try to make laws criminalizing the same thing? Precisely due to what those other laws' effects are, which means their whole narrative is dishonest in their intent. Which you can clearly comprehend when they say if you are pro gun you want more dead kids, as if that's the only motivation for keeping one's guns.
Since the consequences of gun laws is to harm a citizen's ability to defend themselves, while not achieving its purpose and such restrictions apply mostly to non-deviant behavior as most citizens already aren't using their guns in what we've already classified as criminal activity, then we can label it immoral. The ability to live (which is what all morality ultimately supports) requires being able to defend oneself from threats. Any attempt to prevent or stop one from exercising self defense is a threat upon that person's life.
I saw a video of an Australian woman,crying she said "America don't give up your guns we gave up ours and now criminals are having a field day going house to house robbing,raping and killing knowing no one can protect their selves
hearing Feinstein manage to speak a coherent sentence really takes me back about 63 years.
the reason Australia "hasn't had a mass shooting since" is because they changed the definition of a mass shooting to be 5 deaths or more. also home invasion and gun crime rates went up after the ban proving laws don't affect criminals (Australian resident btw)
@@chrisdornerrespecter8884 Considering your talking to an Aussie, he's likely aware of it.
@@uni4rm very aware. its a daily occurrence where I'm from
Same as NZ when the Christchurch shootings happened. It didn't change much in regards to shootings. I remember 2019/2020 was a bad year for South Auckland (if not Auckland in general) with shootings.
And now you get to watch police beat up and arrest people for being outside in Australia.
Literally every first world nation that has srrict gun laws has less gun deaths than America even when accounting for population.....................................................
I literally had an educated coworker tell me that background checks aren’t required on any firearms and that ARs are machine guns. She thought you could walk into Walmart and purchase a shotgun and walk out. I said “let’s go, I’ll pay for it!” Just to show her.
I always do that and tell them we can have police waiting to turn it in and boy do they get really quiet.
I was in line for the shoot part of my cc, and the two guys in line behind me were of the opinion that people should only be allowed revolvers. What?
Yea, you can't even get ammo at the Walmart around here. Haha, I'd love to hear that shit from someone, just so I can show them how wrong they are.
Educated...especially college educated is the new term meaning mentally f@cking retarded and in debt up to their eyes paying to get that way.
Did she take you up on the offer?
It literally kills me that they think making laws against guns is gonna make it harder for criminals to have them, when the literal definition of “criminal” is someone who DOES NOT FOLLOW LAWS. 🤦🏼♂️
As a Australian I'm disgusted by the gun laws and sad that I was born to late to try and prevent it. And they most definitely confiscated the guns, there actually was at least one if not multiple instances that during the buy back people where making 80% cast lowers and handing them in to milk money and not turn theirs in. Props the them
PUBIC HAIR spread onto a floor in front of a married couple at a wedding. VEINY BLACK KOCK glistening in the winter moonlight
“If violent crime is to be curbed, it is only the intended victim who can do it. The felon does not fear the police, and he fears neither judge nor jury. Therefore what he must be taught to fear is his victim.”
- Jeff Cooper
"Criminals want victims, not a fight." John Correia, ASP. When confronted in a fight with what they thought would be victions, criminals flee. Or die.
Let no man/woman or government tell you what is best for the common good. They fail to see life threw your eyes, they are blinded by a slutty little bitch called power and control. -- Richard O Rios
Easy targets, low hanging fruit. I don't know anyone that comes to work (legit work) and says "yea let me bust my ass harder than anyone around" if they know for certain there is no chance for increased compensation or advancement. Why would criminals be any different?
This is why ALL people ought be armed and have easy access. The 2A has no previsions that can have that right removed, prevented, or restricted for anyone. No matter how corrupt the SCOTUS may be. Fact is, you all know for a fact. The very people you'll be facing soon? Won't be criminals... It'll be traitors and redcoats wearing a badge, and/or camo w/ boots. Good luck to us all when the Balkanization begins.
"my rights are not up for debate" - Michael Malice
Australia’s home invasions went thru the roof after law abiding citizens could no longer have guns. Imagine that.
Rape and assault increased as well, and the murder rate didn't change over the course of 10 years, meaning people just found another way to kill, and more people became defenseless victims.
Intended side effects, if you ask me.
Shhhh at least there's no scary self loading self shooting guns out there.
400 PERCENT INCREASE IN HOME INVASION SINCE THE PEOPLE BENT OVER AND LICKED THEIR BOOTS..
And just like the recession here in America didnt they change the definition or could no longer define what a home invasion is? 🤔
Also there has been multiple mass shootings post banning guns.
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is what is known as a smack down. This is an example of facts v. emotions.
I love how well these videos are constructed. You make logical facts against this “comedian” and you also provide sources
I will NEVER take advice about gun ownership from a non gun owner. Let alone some comedian.
A comedian's job is to be laughed at... achievement unlocked. lol
Amen brother
your generosity is unmatched for calling him a comedian
@@anthonybarefoot6744 Yeah, from what I can tell his specialty is woke comedy followed by haranguing anyone in the audience who objects pretty much till they leave.
But his wife's boyfriend thinks he's funny...
Australia: We don't have a gun violence problem anymore. I mean, there were all those people we rounded up at gunpoint for not complying with covid restrictions, but they were clearly asking for it.
Also Australia: has mass shootings
Lol that's true
Australia is now requiring government permission to leave the country. It's a literal prison.
@@libertyjones1451
Australia was literally founded as a prison colony.
Making Queen Victoria proud, I guess.
please, send us guns
When I was 27 years old, I had to get surgery done, which left me vulnerable and alone after I got home for several days.
A man came to my door in the middle of the night, around 2:30 AM, claiming he was lost and wanting water. I lived in a cabin in the middle of nowhere near Tannersville, NY and thought it was highly suspicious they wouldn't go to my more visible neighbor's house, so I hobbled over to my closet and grabbed a pistol out of my small safe.
That was when the guy started trying to bust down my door, but the chain lock stopped him from getting all the way through. He saw me hobbling back as I chambered a round and he ran. I got lucky because even being a vet, trained in budo taijutsu, I stood no chance against this large, uninjured man in my weakened state... except my instinct to grab a gun.
This was the incident that pushed me to concealed carry with a round in the chamber. Had he gotten through the door before I loaded and chambered, I may not even be here.
THANK YOU COLION!! I’m sure glad you’re on our side. It is obvious you are a very smart person and a good spokesman!!
I like how this comedian brings up the capitol insurrection but leaves out the
Interesting how he shifted to a situation in which the only gun fired was fired by a cop, at an unarmed citizen.
Insurrection..
How exactly would that group of people take on the US military?
Does anyone believe that temporary occupation of that building with unarmed or lightly armed people, would remove power from the government?
That’s like Seattle chop zone larping that they are an autonomous country
"Insurrection."
1. It wasn't an insurrection, it was a few people walking around looking at art and sitting in chairs that they paid for with their tax money.
2. If it had been an insurrection, the people have every right to commit insurrection when the government stops representing them.
I have more defensive tools in my closet than the entirety of the "insurrection." Weird.
Not to mention the protesters at the capitol werent armed and the only one shot was an unarmed protestor.
For those that forgot, the Colombine shooting was in 1997 in the middle of the "Assault Weapon Ban." It featured a Hi-Point 995, a firearm built specifically around the AWB regulations, and a Tec-9, a firearm banned by name in the AWB. The first major school shooting featured a firearm built around the most nonsensical firearm restrictions in US history and one that was banned by name. If that doesn't convey just how much of a failure the AWB was, the fact that it wasn't renewed because congress recognized it had literally ZERO effect on crime should. Why are they pushing for something they know absolutely did not work at all?
Don't forget the sawed off shotguns they cut down themselves and used. And the pipe bombs they built. Niether of which their parents ever noticed.
They acquired all of their weapons via an adult who straw bought the guns for them. He was subsequently charged and convicted for his part in the massacre.
@@burnyburnoutze2nd Actually a female friend straw purchased 3 of their 4 guns, she was not charged. A coworker introduced a second man to the shooters who sold them the Tec-9, both those men were charged.
There's so much wrong about the official story behind columbine. Reports of more shooters, EMTs dragging dead kids around fields (disturbing crime scene), the bloodsplatter proves they couldn't have "ended" eachother, oh and both their parents were working at a nearby military base. Maybe they wanted to intimidate their parents about going public with classified information like the Aurora kid debacle.
They repeat the enactment of the same laws to remind the public to be afraid, so those who are considering purchasing firearms and are ignorant, will be too afraid... or... continue voting for those same laws.
It's creating the illusion of safety when in reality it's a continued nerfing of our rights until confiscation is the result.
@@CrankyBarista Comfinscation?
Damn this is quickly becoming my favorite channel and Content Creator by far. Collin you are the man! Your facts, interviews and news content are great and informative. I like your calm, no bs delivery. Thank you!
Your arguments are awesome! I so appreciate you brother. Putting this in the archives as a permanent reference material.
"...countries like ours."
Except those countries like ours don't have a 1st or a 2nd amendment.
Yeah. What exactly did he mean by countries like ours? None of those countries have a constitution or our freedoms. There is no other country like ours. What a hack.
@Dog Sweat another good point.
This is the Same Socialist agenda the A=ldobrandini Family of LUISS University and O=rsini Family used with Hitler to Destabilize the Population on itself during ww2,, It was coming from the Social Engineering standpoint and not from its leaders, But the leaders were playing along with the Institution standpoint,
LUISS R-alph -P-ercy A=lesandro O=rsini L-ee R=osenberg h=owards A_ldobrandini F=arnese LUISS Thinktank !!!
"No one's coming to take your guns" has the same energy as a person standing with the women and children inside a castle under siege saying "I've been hearing about this mythical enemy for weeks now and I have yet to see a single enemy soldier. No one's coming to take this castle."
Except literally every failed background check or charge fir carrying without a permit is someone who has effectively gad their guns taken
Let us also never forget what happened in New Orleans immediately following hurricane Katrina.
@@youbetterwakeup2449 Yep, they went door to door.
@@youbetterwakeup2449
Should have been hanged for trying. Things won't change without radical action and they're making sure of that so it can be used against us.
The penalty under US 18 242 "Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law" makes clear the punishment is from 10 years up to the death penalty. It is illegal to create, conspire to create, or enforce laws that restrict ones right. 241 and 242
@@jhutch1470 that was really messed up i could not imagine how mad they were.
Dude, I love what you do!!! I'm so happy to hear what you say all the time!!! I wish I could afford to join forces with you and more people like you!!!
School us and expose😮these sneaky idiots.
The 7 dislikes are the "hecklers" he hires for his shows since he doesn't actually know how to be a comedian
Dude definitely does hire his hecklers, that's all he posts videos of "comedian OWNS heckler" dude gets heckled more in a week than most comedians do in their entire lifetime, there's no way he's not paying them.
This comedian must suck because I never heard of him
@@dodgeitall3816
I watched like one or two of his “heckler owned” vids a couple years ago, but that’s literally it. I would definitely presume to some extent he affiliates with these hecklers based on how often he has them
@@dodgeitall3816 He's a second-rate comedian at best... That might be too generous.
I’ll watch his videos when they pop up ONLY to remind myself why I can’t stand him. He’s so fake
In his "argument" for a gun registration, he disingenuously conflated person to person transactions with straw purchases, making them seem like they're one and the same. Straw purchases are already illegal, selling your personal property is not.
Also, he brought up "Red Flag" laws and mentioned Florida using them the most, while ignore that the vast majority of those cases in Florida were all centered in Broward County, the single most liberal county in that entire state and the location of the Broward Cowards who refused to do their job and save those kids at Parkland.
Egg Saladly.
I was going to write the same thing.
I get inundated with jacka$$es who think straw purchases in red states that travel to next door blue states are the main reason illegal guns are rampant. 🙄
@@CrankyBarista The best part about that is, even if it were true, that would prove our point. After all, the guns are the same no matter which state they're in. Who gets their hands on those guns is also the same. The only variable is the state, and what do anti gun states have that pro gun states don't? A disarmed civilian population. So even if we grant them everything in that point, we're still right because criminals would still be seeking out areas where people are defenseless
Amen
Well done. I caught that too.
I’m glad I started watching your videos. I learn so many things about one main hobby I plan on getting into: guns. I already have my first firearm selected, I know it’ll fit my large hands perfectly, and I plan on taking your advice to go to the range as much as possible to practice. Thank you for what you do.
Big respect to Colion Noir, 🙏🏼
Dont hate on him guys, his wife's boyfriend took his Nintendo away and his mom didnt increase his allowance, he's a little upset.
Steve has been divorced for years now so it’s actually his secret boyfriend’s secret girlfriend that took those away!
@@jefferydebbink282 Steve is divorced? Whoo would divorce a catch like that?
/s
Whi the crap is Steve?
Well he better get over it quickly because it’s his turn to sleep on the sofa tonight (to be fair it’s been his turn to NOT sleep with his wife, in his own bed for the last 6 years…)
The lack of testosterone is at epidemic proportions
They’re so disingenuous. They say “nobody is coming for your guns”, but would 100% support it if they did.
That’s a really solid, solid, point.
@ least they came out and admitted it control freaks!
As long as liberals can work in a “Yeah but…” they’ll justify it.
This is the Same Socialist agenda the A=ldobrandini Family of LUISS University and O=rsini Family used with Hitler to Destabilize the Population on itself during ww2,, It was coming from the Social Engineering standpoint and not from its leaders, But the leaders were playing along with the Institution standpoint,
LUISS R-alph -P-ercy A=lesandro O=rsini L-ee R=osenberg h=owards A_ldobrandini F=arnese LUISS Thinktank !!!
My opinion is this: get a gun dont get a gun I don't care
Soooo, the POTENTIAL misuse of an object gives moral authority to ban it?
It's easier for a criminal to get a gun than a law biding citizens.
This is the most attention Steve has ever had. He's very confident and very ignorant. A combination I see lots of these days.
It really is amazing how easy it is for technology to reveal the imbeciles among us, as well as give those same imbeciles a voice and platform to preach from and propagate their idiocy. Double-edged sword.
The only reason I know who this buffoon is, is because I searched his name while watching Colin's rebuttal.
Also, this is really dangerous. Because most people aren't very confident. But are easily persuaded by and attracted to confidence alone. So it's easy for confident morons to gather large followings.
Never heard of him.
Truth!
His entire reasoning is “make it harder for bad person, so bad person won’t shoot people” but that hurts the good person, and makes it easier for the bad person to hurt the good person.
Ya, because then if more people get hurt, instead of loosening on the laws they put in place, they will say it will work if we squeeze harder, by then, no one will have guns anymore, and even if crime is still up, probably even higher from before they took everyone's guns away, they won't bother anymore because the people they wanted to enslave are us, and criminals don't follow laws anyways so they don't care about them, just the majority of us they can round up and tax the living hell out of.
You also have to love his argument of Hitler did not create Germany's gun registration. No he didn't create the registration but he sure as hell used it to confiscate firearms from every single Jew living in Germany. It's easy to make yourself look smart in a CZcams video when you have no one pointing out your lies in real time. He thinks he has won an argument by pointing out Hitler did not create the registration law while completely ignoring the fact that he used it for confiscation which is the real argument pro 2A are making that registration exist for the purpose of confiscation. He actually proved the pro 2A people are correct when they claim that registration leads to confiscation because this is exactly what happened.
This sounds like circular logic lol but I know what you mean.
@@Killsnapz lol True . this comment needs 1776 likes LOL
@@Killsnapz exactly when i read ''trusty-worthy '' Germans i ROFLMAO!
Thanks Colion, these anti gun ppl need to be told the truth.
Excellent as always. Please keep doing these. You do such a great job.
Every single teenage kid in high school has easier access to weed than alcohol and that guy selling the weed can for sure get illegal firearms. That dude acted like the black market is hard to network or something.
I mean it's very easy to make you're own alcohol, all you need is a liquid that contains sugar and some activated bread yeast
That's true, but I think that has more to do with it being easier concealed than alcohol.
Not gonna give much info but I managed to get a firearm despite being an “undesirable”. So I basically just disproved the ginger’s point.
Something I've noticed about a lot of people trying to win arguments is that most of them can't resist belittling people who disagree with them. It's actually a sign of a weak argument 🤣
Ad hominem attacks are all they have, which is why they refer to anyone who disagrees with them as things such as bigot, racist, supremes, all kinds of -phobes, etc. It's also a sign of low intelligence.
@@youbetterwakeup2449 Those words are their cultish buzz-words they use as magical charms to ward off any questioning of their dogmatic bigotry. Kind of like in the old days when religious zealots would scream "Heretic!" or "Witch!", to any who questioned their BS
They belittle because their arguments are easily thwarted.
@@alvinmonero3462 exactly! Its just like saying someone is committing blasphemy. Its a conversation ender because most people will not do the proper thing and ignore it so they can use logic and continue destroying their non argument. Peoples natural instinct is to defend themselves and start arguing how they arent a racist, biggot, transphobe, insert assumed insult here...
Which has the opposite effect intended for the person on the defense and usually makes them look guilty.
This is the Same Socialist agenda the A=ldobrandini Family of LUISS University and O=rsini Family used with Hitler to Destabilize the Population on itself during ww2,, It was coming from the Social Engineering standpoint and not from its leaders, But the leaders were playing along with the Institution standpoint,
LUISS R-alph -P-ercy A=lesandro O=rsini L-ee R=osenberg h=owards A_ldobrandini F=arnese LUISS Thinktank !!!
I wonder what is the actual death rate by automobiles, drunk drivers, or just a terribly unfortunate accident.
Zero crime control...
Ask Alberta about a boogeyman (RCMP) literally going door to door confiscating legally owned firearms, and they used the later scrapped gun-registry as a shopping list.
Debate FACTS, Steve... Tell me how this would not happen when it _already has._
Defeating every straw man argument is what his video should be called.
He's so funny that I forgot to laugh. What a comedian.
Absolutely beautiful! Thank you Colion!!!!
The government once banned all production, possession, consumption, and sale of alcohol...how well did that work out? Marijuana has been Federally illegal for over a century, and yet it's in virtually every household in America right now.
That fact alone debunks every gun control debate ever made.
Yeah but I'm pretty sure the federal government is knee deep in the drug game, which was the whole point of criminalizing it in the first place. Not to get rid of it, but to control it easier. The government still works with drug cartels, legal (big pharma) or illegal (DEA).
"In virtually every household"???...found the Californian.
Despite my snark your argument is sound, Reefer Man.
@@jimh472 -- I didn't make the statement in favor of weed. I despise marijuana, as well as those who use it. I was just making a point about the relationship between laws and human action.
"The government would take your guns if they could get away with it"
The Taliban just did this to Afghan citizens LOL
They also got plenty of 'military grade weaponry' from the very government that says we can't have any.
Which is sad and shows what of absolutely greedy bastards they really are. After all we just left them more guns than they will ever need.
@@majorpwner241 yep, i am still waiting on my free 50 cal mounted on an armored humvee, with a case of small arms as backup
its ok as long as they're not patriotic law abiding american citizens.
@@kellyyoung1665 right? I want an MRAP
I appreciate everything you do and are doing. I really like watching the videos, ty
Are we our own first responder, medical support, security protection and detective that can fix the criminal justice? : HELL YA
As a red haired human being, we don’t claim that guy, we traded him for money considerations in the last chapelle draft, we almost had to give up Shawn white in that deal it was a hard negotiation
Well played, sir.
You'll have to draft bill burr next. Hes bald but hes a ginger at heart, I hear the black delegation is planning to swoop him because of his wife.
@@somedude1666 nah screw him too he's pro depopulation
@@morganophelia5963
Hey, some people need to be killed off. Just a few harmless mass killings y'know, maybe even a few Purges.
I don't dis the gingers cuz of one acting out. It may be faked, too, He's been bullied by lil girls , last week.
to be a leftist, one must necessarily be dishonest or stupid or both.
and have a stick up their ass
I'm going to go with both 😏
@@ayomrwhiteigotdrip6235 It would seem, according to internet research, that they place the stick there willingly.
You would have to strain every muscle in your brain to get that stupid.
@David Dirusso I put my statement in a comment on another post. One of these idiots actually commented back, he said, you know the brain is not a muscle!. So it's impossible to strain your brain muscle because it's not a muscle. Now how stupid is that?.
That clip of biden is wild. I forgot about the time when they let him talk on TV at all🤣
Love your channel bro.
I’ve been trolling the hell out of Steve’s CZcams channel for you.
I send him a message every couple of days asking why he won’t have a face to face debate with you. I would love to see you destroy his idiotic arguments to his face.
“When a private seller sells a gun to someone with no background check that is later used in a crime, do you know who’s at fault?”
Uh, the criminal who used the gun? Lmfao
I'm glad I'm not the only one who caught that. Also, he conveniently ignored any and all laws against private sales to a prohibited person.
It's almost useless to argue in good faith with someone arguing disingenuously.
It's never about personal responsibility. It's always someone else's fault. Also, I don't recall him mentioning the oft cited "gun show loophole." If I recall, however, that applies only to sales between two people selling to each other, usually people who know each other. Further, I believe it's allowed to not perform the background check, but is most often done anyway. It's a good step to take for the dealer, and for the seller in case a crime IS committed by the buyer. On top of that, going through a licensed FFL is the best insurance for the seller against being the last known purchaser or registered owner.
Exactly. Same as if I sold a high performamce car to someone and they end up wrapping it around a tree and killing themselves - and perhaps others - in the process. Whose liable? According to brainiac Steve's logic it would be me, the seller.
@@CranfordPark Well, the United States Government performed not one but 3 Federal background checks on the female San Bernardino shooter. 2 in order for her to enter the country, and a 3rd to legally purchase the firearm she used. Fat lot of good that did the people in the Inland Regional Center. Please tell me again how universal background checks will stop mass shootings, Steve.
Well, any other time it's the guns fault according to the demorats
12:23
"Frick and Hitler intended to liberalize gun control laws in Germany for 'trustworthy' citizens, while disarming "unreliable" persons, *especially the Jewish population*"
Steve Hofstetter: from part 1 @ 6;13
"Also making it harder to own a gun, actually rewards responsible gun owners by making it more of an exclusive club"
The parallel is frightening, the ignorance is unbelievable.
Exclusive club.... Sounds like the words of a petty tyrant.
My firearms are not dog biscuits. They are self-preservation tools.
Sounds like Steve is a nazi
Funny thing is, he's Jewish
I bet if you asked this guy “would you be in favor of removing guns from people that are statistically more likely to commit gun crimes?”
He would say yes, and then scream in horror as the government stopped allowing black people to own guns.
By definition criminals do not follow LAWS.."..
I love how some people on one hand acknowledges the war on drugs has failed because you can't beat the black market, therefore drug restrictions should be lifted, but at the same time thinks banning guns is going to be effective because criminals are too dumb to figure out the black market and gangs will absolutely not earn mad profit by trafficking illegal guns the same way they do with illegal drugs.
"This folks is why i love arguing against dumb smart people, because they sacrifice intellectual consistency for the cheap thrill of sounding smart. " excellent.
"It is difficult to buy illegal things without getting caught." Yes, that is why the are no drug addicts in this country and you cannot find even an ounce of pot at your local high school.
I wonder how all the gang criminals in Sweden got their guns and other stuff like hand grenades. Oh they must have got caught... not, unfortunately. These wet cuck comedians should see what actually goes on the street.
@@tpuukko4424 by default, comedians aren’t meant to be taken seriously
Cheers
@@tomdavis3038 Yeah, just a shame that guys like this comedian may have quite a bit of influence.
You seem to be conflating "difficult" with "impossible."
@@spongeintheshoe It’s not difficult at all to buy illegal things without getting in trouble. People go for decades breaking the law without getting caught
Seeing all those guns destroyed and melted down just disgusts me, all those people now have no way to actually defend themselves.
Love your channel. Keep up the great work.....
This dude: Haha. I’m a white tower liberal “comedian” that knows more than you. Watch me prescribe what’s best for everyone and ignore their personal freedoms.
@Good Goy ginger
That is called narcissisms. They have this belief that they are so much greater than people that don't think like them and they know what is best for them. Narcissism comes from insecurities of the world around them.
@Good Goy yea white
@Good Goy Your name is super appropriate. Keep doing what they tell you.
Nailed it
This guy's a great comedian. All his points are jokes.
Ikr? He's the biggest joke of all!
Good one
Great comedian is a huge stretch. A joke of a person yes.
You had us in the first half, not gonna lie.
Ha
8:04 The criminal is responsible. How is this even a talking point 😂
These "Privileged" people keep forgetting, without the 2A the 1A goes away, if you regulate 1 amendment you MUST regulate all. That's a bad thing.
“How you choose to NOT protect yourself is none of my business” lol
Great job blessings and stay strong
When there are countless examples of disarmament in history that have resulted in oppression, it’s hard to be moved on this issue. Even Australia and Europe saw stark increases in knife crime after strict gun laws. Defending yourself against a knife is really difficult for a normal citizen, especially without a gun.
Speaking of Australia. Behold the startling rise of tyranny they're experiencing now. The argument that nations don't intend to disarm their people to later oppress them out of "necessity" is being proven false right now.
@@riboflavinfolate3964 no shit that, threat of continuing lockouts until X amount of ppl are vaccinated is unreal... at least the French know what the fuck time it is. Riots and protests oh my.
@@_DanielFernandez_ I’ve seen the Brits out on the street protesting, and the East Germans as well-I don’t think that they’re afraid of Merkel like the West Germans.
In London they keep talking about banning house knives. But then again, don’t knives have the advantage over a gun within 10ft?
@@voodoosurvivor148 You're probably thinking of the experiments from a police department that found someone with a knife can run up and stab someone with a holstered gun before he can take the gun out and shoot. That range was actually found to be about 20ft. Obviously, that doesn't matter you've unholstered your gun.
Home Invasions in Australia also went through the roof following their "gun buy back"
Don't want to sell it and you can't have it. NOW WHAT?
Hearing "It's hard for a regular person to buy things that are illegal" is the most laughable thing I've heard in a while. If that was the case drugs wouldn't be an issue.
Hofstetter's argument isn't being made in good faith, he's flat out lying at many points, and that's ignoring the deception and obfuscation. You're under no obligation to argue in good faith against someone arguing in bad faith. No one is.
@Good Goy he's a Swindler, through and through, capable only of subversion and deceit, but never truth or honesty.
I remember I was watching a clip of him where he was talking about how people of his group wouldn't want jobs that weak plebs work, like jobs at pottery barn.
Someone in the crowd mentioned Hollywood, and Steve developed terminal hurtfeelioma and kicked the guy out of his comedy special, throwing a whiny tantrum on stage.
He obviously hasn't met Saint Benitez.
Colion isn't making the argument to persuade the comedian (so-called), he's doing it to persuade reasonable people who are sitting on the fence who might otherwise be perseauded by Hofstetter's lies and dissembling.
@Good Goy What? Comedian? Red head? Because I know it ain't Jewish. Because if that's what you're implying, you just lost any and all credibility.
@Good Goy Then you're an anti-semite.
"The Government would confiscate all guns if they could just get away with it." then says how that wouldnt happen... somone hasnt looked at Australia at all
Bravo, Mr. Noir. Great part 2 to the first piece. I'm glad you're a Pro-2A attorney, you're always spot on with your explanations that I'm far from eloquent in comparison to. Maybe if it was a written piece, but, speaking as you do expresses that which I usually if not always concur with, however again - don't have the public speaking skills that come with that Poker Face you have when engaged in face-to-face dialogue.
I have a hard enough time dealing with taxation/regulation agencies in Tax Court, and, that's with all the paperwork is in front of me.
I suppose practice practice practice, just like I do with my old kit from 20 yrs ago IDPA/IPSC days; same deal with public speaking, practice until perfect.
Subscribed. I love your content!
"its harder for people to do things that are illegal the regular person doesnt understand the blackmarket"
drug addiction: im about to end this mans career
The black market thing, is he kidding?
Waiting for a bus on a busy city street, I was approached by a guy who asked me if I wanted some weed.
I said no, but how much for a handgun?
$50.
I told him I didn't have that much cash and left, but it would've been that easy.
@@ninjabearpress2574 exactly. People like this guy are the rich wealthy upper class suburban people who've never actually experienced life for most of America and want to dictate for the rest of us they scoff at " you need 30 rounds you shouldnt hunt" what about 50 feral hogs rampaging your proeprty while your kids are outside" they scoff and laugh at you like that doesnt happen all the time in some places. They think an AR15 will turn you to goo Cuz theyve never fires one. Theyve never walked the streets of the hood late at night passing by groups of thugs hoping they leave you alone in a place where you cant own guns but you so because you HAVE to. I cant stand these kinds of people. And ALL anti gunners are the same. Theyve never experienced the need to protect themselves so they scoff and act like no one should. They site ALLLLL THIS DATA.. but whta do they NEVER site.. self defense situations which vastly out weigh crimes committed. in some situations having a firearm deters it from ever happening. Why do all the people that hate cops never run up on a police station. Because they know they will get shot immediatly.. accept now if your a dem city the cops will surrender and run away and let you have the police station like in portland. Why did no one actually try to storm area 51.. they know they will die. Why on jan6th did people NOT show up armed to the teeth to over throw the government.. because that wasnt the goal and they didnt want a war. Despite what the news says.. it was a deliberate false flags we know the fbi had informants on the ground as well as dc police. We know there was people antagonizing both sides. It was made to happen. Yet people like this fool think jan 6 was all nazis. Not even remotely true...
We need to fully realize the media is causing the vast majority of problems as they compete with internet media. Corporate media needs rage bait and lies to stay relevant..
They act like the “black market” means some clandestine underground network like the ppl from John Wick. It’s really not that deep.
@@Tarumarugan Right, I grew up outside of Philly and one trip to the city could yeild crack, heroin, bootleg DVDs, knock-off designer merchandise, prostitutes and yes guns...all super illegal yet readily available. I couldn't agree more, this dude was born with a silver spoon up his ass which has apparently blinded him to how the real world works. Just because something is illegal doesn't mean that it's going away, it just means that now it's gonna be run by criminals who will see the opportunity to make vast profits and will do so as they have done with all the above mentioned vice products.
Please stop using that stupid "im about to end mans career" unfunny overused joke. I hate that comedians argument too, but don't be annoying yourself.
Red Flag laws aren't frequently used? Tell that to my close friend in Indiana, whose house was raided and his firearms were confiscated for merely making non-threatening comments on social media. This happened at the beginning of the cancel culture/wokeness. Snowflakes took offense to his biblical arguments and reported him. Now, he's defenseless and, per federal and state law, not allowed to possess a firearm.
What people don't realize is that the 1st is protected by the 2nd.
the poor guy became a perfect example of how red flags are weapons for the left.
hope he gets his rights back.
Tell him to at least get some black powder guns until he gets his rights back.
Frequently compared to what?
Rape isn’t frequent either, doesn’t make it ok
@@robertvondarth1730 That's a great comparison.
“Assault weapon” makes me laugh, it mean’s literally nothing but their whole argument is based on it
Dude ain't even a funny comic.
I'm not surprised he thinks he's a gun expert!!😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
"comedian"
I'd argue all these comedians are just activists, looking for applause, instead of laughter.
I miss the days when you had to be funny to be a comedian.
Like when Chappelle did that 8:47 long skit on fentanyl floyd.
Clapghter
@@SonofaB__ssnessowner Sounds like a social disease... the Clap! LOL!
@@rickswordfire4774 like Jimmy Fallon never thought he was funny ever!!!! Snl stopped being funny after Chris Farley passed away. I have not watched SNL since then.
I like how he conflates owning a gun, which is a neutral act, to actual crime. Most laws, since the beginning of human civilization, have been made against behaviors with necessarily negative consequences for the rights of others (e.g. murder, robbery ,rape et cetera). Possession of an item has no such consequences and that's why the prohibition of items, weather it be drugs or guns, is stupid and an exercise in futility. Banning neutral items because someone will misuse them is silly, precisely because it serves only to keep those items out of the hands of people who likely would not misuse them, while criminals would continue to break the law and obtain guns through whatever nefarious sources they can find. While mass shooters might find it slightly more difficult to find a gun, violent criminals who perpetrate the vast majority of gun violence in the country would remain unaffected, as they already make their living through the black market that Stevie boy thinks is so hard to gain access to. I think worse than his disengenous, puerile arguments are his lame, cringy attempts at humor. His tries to be a political comedian but utterly fails on both fronts. He's just another lame, inauthentic virtue-signaling, white-knight leftist who wants to oversimplify complex issues to people who already agree with his worldview.
I can drive 20 mins to the city, walk around for maybe another 20 mons and get a 9mm, no questions asked for about $400, cheaper thsn the store now a days.
Couldn't have said it better. Bravo
pretty much tells you what they think about gun ownership and gun owners.
That was quite well thought out. Cheers.
Prohibition did not work. Maybe the Republicans learned from that disaster. But not the Socialist Dems. The party of the KKK. FDR refused to save any Jews. Proof his unconstitutional gun laws were not about saving lives. FDR's New Deal starved Americans to death. He had crops plowed under, as millions went hungry. FDR helped Russia during the war more than he did the UK. He called Stalin "Uncle Joe," and Mussolini a "fine gentleman." Kennedy always believed FDR had his son killed.
Are we all gonna ignore that he has the perfect curve on his hat 😂
I haven't caught any pistol or gun I own sneaking out of my safe to go to harm to others...
They went door to door during Katrina and rounded up all the guns. But I guess that doesn’t count…
And they went door to door after the Boston false flag, and rounded up all the people. I imagine once they round up the people, looking for the guns would be a lot safer for them. Don't let them put you on the bus!
The police also executed unarmed citizens on a bridge in cold blood during the aftermath of Katrina.
The “Make it harder for terrorist to use these weapons to kill us.” Didn’t age very well.
Thank for publicly exposing this joker for the fool he is. Goodonya!
The gun debate is as simple as 4 words. SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!
"Terrorism at the capital" .... I can't eye roll hard enough.
Why isn’t Colion Noir not already the President of the NRA? Can you even imagine what he could do in a leadership position to protect the 2A, with his strong character, exceptional charisma, depth of knowledge, and intensely passionate sincerity about protecting ALL of our constitutional rights ?
Edit: To clarify, Colion shouldn’t just be NRA president as it is now, rather he should lead a new advocacy group, one that actually does what the NRA once purported to do.
The NRA is controlled opposition bullshit. They've supported every major 2a violation since they were founded... Don't give them any money, give it to better organizations like the GOA
Think he left the nra
Agree wit everything except the NRA part. Not sure bout that 1
You guys mean he should be a leader in the GOA
NRA is behind the NFA and ultimately the ATF, the NRA is not on the side of the 2A
This is good stuff. Im way late on seeing it, but definitely glad i found it. 💪
Tree's lookin' a little parched, gentleman.
CN is mic dropping the hell outta Mr Pasty
Colion definitely put more skill points into Charisma 🤣
Colion is a national treasure!
Be wary. Notice how he said pistols were used more often than rifles in shootings and that's not the only time he said it. He's going to get all pistols banned and that's what the ATF is currently going after. He also supports the current 4473's which present all of your information on the front page for the ATF to take a photo every year they check paperwork for FFLs. He also directly funded the ATF by purchasing a supressor and paying their tax stamp.
You are absolutely correct ! He must be protected at ALL costs.🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Absolutely.
@@Chewee394 Silly arguments you presented. One, he's pointing out the stats when it comes to what kinds of firearms are used most often in crime. That's simply stating a fact. Two, the 4473 only shows proof of purchase. It does not keep track of ownership of the firearm once it is sold, so the ATF may know that you bought the gun, but they don't know if you still have it - i.e. sold it, lost it in a boating accident, etc. Third, ANYONE who has bought a suppressor has paid for the tax stamp. So by your logic every person who has bought a suppressor is conspiring with the ATF. 🙄
@@riboflavinfolate3964 one, the ATF and anti-2a lawyers will still use his words to try and get rid of pistols. Two, the ATF absolutely tracks firearms purchases. They will go to down the chain of ownership until they get to your house and pressure you until you give in arrest you for withholding evidence. Third, anyone who bought a suppressor IS directly supporting the ATF. The tax stamp does absolutely nothing but help give the ATF an extra paycheck which helps them continue to function unconstitutionally.
I'm at 14:39 and I haven't gotten to your rebuttal, but OMG he really doesn't undetstand how easy it really is to find and buy a weapon on the streets. Maybe I'm just too smart? Even the least intelligent kid in my High School, when I was a freshman 38 years ago, knew all you had to do was go to the bad part of town and you can find someone to sell you one. That was 38 years ago and he 'thinks' High School has changed THAT MUCH??? If we figured it out that long ago, the knowledge is out in the wild. Anyone can figure that out.
Oh wait, his arguement was 'it will make it a little more difficult.' How? He's saying criminals, who are ALREADY breaking the law will all of the sudden pay a little attention to the NEW law??? That doesn't make ANY sense at all.
The only thing this comedian defeated was humor. He killed it.
"Australia Great Britain, countries like ours" Obama apparently never read about the Revolutionary War. You know the war we fought to NOT be like Great Britain or Australia? Individual rights in GB and the Commonwealth are much more limited than in the USA!
Yes, I agree. People like him only seem to have the opinions of whoever told him to have that opinion and no regard for the sacrifices of much better men.
Yes they are more limited but guess what? That's a fairly recent thing. We have a right to keep and bear arms and had one before the Constitution. As Justice Scalia pointed out in his very long majority opinion in the Heller vs DC case and every one should know, the Second Amendment does not give us the right to keep and bear arms. It protects an already existing right from government infringement. Many things led to the American Revolution but the actual shooting war started over Brittish Soldiers attempting to seize Colonial Armories and as citizens to include Colonial Militiamen always had arms on the as well as in the home they were able to defend their stored armaments. You see as I said the Revolution had many causes the oft quoted taxation without representation should read no legislation without representation. The Colonists because of the US location and inhospitable nature at the time had from the beginnings enjoyed quite a bit of autonomy for quite a while. When they began to object to taxation and some other laws supported by both the Crown and Parliment( that's something that always seems to be forgotten most of our problems were coming from Parliment not just King George) They began to show signs of rebellion and in addition there were many Scott's and Irish in the Colonies that had very warm relations with England's enemy France. This led The Crown and Parliament to not just tax but begin to attempt rolling back not just the colonies level of autonomy but also to restrict their rights as English Subjects. The right to keep and bear arms for example was a staple of English Common law dating back the Alfred the Great of Wessex when he retired Wessex to fight the Vikings. Its why Wessex remained to only Kingdom of early Britian the Vikings didn't conquer. Thats the reason that Netflix series is called "The Last Kingdom". Wessex was the last Kingdom not dominating by the Vikings..So what the American Colonists fought for was both representation and also a restoration of the rights as English subjects. The right under English Common law has been completely eroded because in those countries almost anything can be voted away if they even get to vote the issue to begin with. We fortunately 240 years ago decided to be different our rights don't come from the government and they can't just be voted away.
It’s weird how he says Democrats don’t want to take guns away but even Biden is trying to ban everything more advanced than a double barrel shotgun. I don’t mind Steve as a comedian but he should stick with that
i think he should stick to cuckoldry
That boy is NO comedian.
We're coming for all your guns one law at a time. Might not be today but maybe tomorrow.
@@KilroggWOW lol, ok. Stone cold don't drink soy tea, nice try bot.
Seeing all those guns being cut in half hurts…