J Sai Deepak Exposes Buddhist Temple Claims at Hindu Temples , Casteism in Buddhism | Vikram Sampath
Vložit
- čas přidán 17. 05. 2024
- "Waiting for Shiva: Unearthing the Truth of Kashi's Gyan Vapi" by Vikram Sampath
💰 kindly consider supporting our YT Team - pages.razorpay.com/supportcle...
Your contributions help us Fund in Spreading the Word to More people ! 🙏
🚀 Don't Want to miss any Video updates ?
💬 Join WhatsApp & Telegram Community -
✅ WhatsApp Channel Link -
whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaJ3...
✅ Telegram Community Link -
t.me/clearcuttalksdiscussion
Video Credits - Original Owner of the Video
*Introduction*
* Organized by Pune Samad, Pra Kitan Foundation & Prabodhan Munch
* Significance of lamp lighting in Indian culture
*About the Book*
* "Waiting for Shiva" explores the history and sanctity of Kashi (Varanasi)
* Discusses the repeated attacks and resilience of the Vishweshwar temple
*Vikram Sampath: Introduction*
* Renowned historian and author
* Acknowledgement for support and gratitude towards Pune
*Book Launch Ceremony*
* Introduction of dignitaries including advocates and authors
*Content of the Book*
* Significance of Shivalinga (representation of Shiva)
* Importance of Kashi Vishwanath Temple in the city's energy structure
* Historical sources used in research (Persian accounts, legal papers)
* Resilience of Hindus in reclaiming sacred spaces
* Weaponization of Buddhist history to downplay Hindu claims
* Importance of understanding the cultural and metaphysical significance of temples
* Belief in the permanent presence of divine energy in Hindu temples
*Historical Context*
* Kashi as a sacred place for Buddhists, Jains, and Hindus
* Coexistence of different faiths in Kashi
* Repeated destruction and reconstruction of the temple by various rulers
* Legal battles fought by Hindus to preserve sacred sites
*Other Discussions*
* Role of different regions of India in contributing to Kashi
* Story of Vishnu's disguise to remove a Buddhist ruler
* Importance of cultural knowledge for interpreting historical facts
* Efforts by historical figures to reclaim Kashi
*Overall Message*
* Importance of understanding the historical and cultural context of Kashi
* Emphasis on preserving Hindu heritage and traditions
*Additional Notes*
* The video includes discussions on specific legal cases and interpretations of religious texts.
* The speaker criticizes the Places of Worship Act and suggests a truth and repatriation tribunal.
* Challenges faced by historians in writing about sensitive topics are also addressed.
[Disclaimer] ⭐
This video has been reposted for educational and informational purposes . All credit for the creation of this content goes to its original owner . We do not claim ownership of any materials used in the making of this video . If you are the rightful owner of the content and wish for it to be removed or credited differently, please contact us immediately. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation .
💰 Support Us : pages.razorpay.com/supportclearcutt
Subscribe Our Backup Channel - youtube.com/@veer2024?si=VcvyIOrkI3QyC88Y
Your generous contributions help us expand our reach and spread the word to more people ! Thank you ! 🙏
🚀 Stay Updated : Don't want to miss any video updates?
💬 Join Our Community :
WhatsApp Channel : whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaJ3N2vBVJlAKI1Z2p3b
Telegram Community : t.me/clearcuttalksdiscussion
These Buddhist champions never talk about the burning down of Nalanda University (forget about rebuilding it) ... never oppose with naming it as Bakhtiyarpur!!
Remember in last 60 - 70 years I have not seen any educated hindu oppose Budda philosophy . Now a days some political buddist ( beemte ) crossed limits . I would like to ask about Buddhism to persons like Dalai Lama . Neo buddist are not buddist at all .
I didnt know about this, I am a buddhist. I know that it was destroyed by the Afghan in th early 1100s. Can you send me a link so that i can read about it.
@@apostate9397Speaking against superstition and illogical beliefs are the core principles of Buddhism.
Namo buddhay 💙.
@@harshvardhan_012With what your IT cells of Raju Chintu collecting refrences from Marxist translation keep doing that buddy you guys are still losers even with reservation 🤦♂️
@@harshvardhan_012the belief that soul exist is unscientific belief in bhuddism and misogyny in bhuddism is well known to everyone.
Angkor watt temple was original a Vishnu temple- buddhists gone there demolished all vishnu idols & installed there all budhas idol, this Angkor watt temple is in Kambodia.
Re -Conversion to Sanatan dharm happened by arguments by Shankaracharya, sri ramanuj and sri madhva.Not by force.🚩
Shankaracharya's service was immeasurable.
Sankaracharya did not have any arms in his hand to use force . Is n't it ?
Reality is shankaracharya never debated against the Theravada Buddhists who have defeated Hindus scholars dozen times before shankaracharya and after shankaracharya..
Shankaracharya himself admitted i am nothing in front of these shunyavaadis..
At the end shankaracharya admired the principle of shunyawaad..
@@harshvardhan_012
Dear sir
One thing is very clear . In India there is multiple way of life ( Dharma) irrespective it hindu , buddist , Jain's . Probably in those time India couldn't evan imagin to convert people by swords or force . Religion is Abrahamic concept . Being an agnostic I don't have any problem with Dharmic sect or path . I believe it from bottom of my heart any dharmic religion is not dogmatic or claim monopoly of truth belongs to them . I am seeking openion from you .
Kudos to Advocates like Sai Deepak and Vishnu Jain who are constantly fighting for the sanatan cause in this civilization battle of survival without compromising on their position whatsoever. #We want all our temples back#.
They say pashupathi was buddists, then I ask them what was it before buddist then? And they seem to hasitated.
Ignore idiots.
Many foreigners are becoming sanatan not Buddhist 😂😂
@@namednpc ignorance
@@wolfsr9259nope because they know which one is first and old as ages.
Then I ask find some archaeological evidence of ram ...
Even ASI report concluded adams bridge is natural formation ..
It wasn't made by any vaanar Sena..
Ramayana was no where discussed in Buddhists or Jain literature..
Then only existed religion was the Vedic or brahminism..
Manusmriti was written in 1st century and ram has given shambhuk punishment according to the manusmriti...
And one more thing sanskrit developed around the 13th century...
Cry more ..
❝ No doubt that the fall of Buddhism in India was due to the invasions of the Muhammadans; Islam came out as the enemy of the 'But'. The word 'But' as everybody knows, is the Arabic word and means idol. Thus, the origin of the word indicates that in the Muhammadan mind, idol worship had come to be identified with the Religion of Buddha; The mission to break the idols thus became the mission to destroy Buddhism. Islam destroyed Buddhism not only in India but whenever it went.❞
- Dr. Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar (Father of the Indian Constitution)
❝ From 986 CE, the Turks started raiding northwest India from Afghanistan, plundering western India early in the eleventh century. Forced conversions to Islam were made, and Buddhist images smashed, due to the Islamic dislike of idolatry. Indeed in India, the Islamic term for an 'idol' became 'budd'.❞
- Peter Harvey, An Introduction to Buddhism
Hindus have always been tolerant and accepting of other religions. The
Bhuddists who feel this way are very ungrateful.
Which country welcomed the Dalai Lama with open arms????
Logical argument.
Yes. I have seen and realised it too ... In south east Asia in the ASEAN countries Buddhists have converted all the ancient Hindu temples in Buddhist. Even in China too
Hinduism is extremely tolerant which is a strength but many times this strength becomes weakness.Many religions born out of it & try to supress the other religion of the same fold .
* Camodia's worlds biggest Vishnu mandir complex converted into a budha temple is best example of that .
To divide Budhhisim and Hinduism away is the main agenda. Budhhisim is as much part of Sanatan Dharma as is modern Hinduism. It is another way of philosophysing the same core concepts. There are many schools of thought in the Dharmic traditions and Buddhisim is one of the most distinct and at one time the very popular amongst them. It is all Kalachakra just like the way Vedic gods like Indra or Varun are hardly worshipped today. Trying to divide our belief systems is the biggest agenda of foreign powers. Most in Indian Kings have always patronised all schools with some exceptions and at some times some preferences. Same temples have motifs from both. Let us not turn this into a divisive agenda.
Super!
Buddha never “rejected” the caste system because it was the social arrangement of his day - he merely emphasised that it should be a merit-based system and not birth-based.
Buddha’s libertarian and anti-establishment views on caste are echoed repeatedly and frequently in the Hindu literature as well. The difference being - Buddha’s views were adopted in toto by his followers and non-discrimination was practiced in admitting members of all castes to the Sangha. But within the Hindu collective, conservatism and liberalism continued to contest with each other - due no doubt to the multiplicity of gurus and their divergent views. There was only one primary Buddha Sangha but hundreds of Hindu Sanghas.
Some examples:-
The Buddha:- "Not by birth is one an outcast; not by birth is one a brahman. By deeds one becomes an outcast, by deeds one becomes a brahman." (Vasala Sutta 27 )
Rami Sivan
There were 4 Varnas/Professions.
[Common Civilians (Shudras), Traders (Vaishyas), Warriors (Kshatriyas), Teachers (Brahmins)]
Learn these terms properly:
(1) Varna/Profession
(2) Lineage/Gotra/Vansh
(3) Tribe/State/Jati/Province/Desh/Group
(4) Nation/Rashtra/Civilization
(5) Caste/Breed/Race
Even if you read hynsang traveling account he mantions people as he is kshritya follower of budhha, he is Brahman follower of budhha, he is vesya follower of budhha even shudra too.
When was that book written ? Have you got any information ?
I met buddhist people in real life. They are the ardent heater of "Sanatan Hindu Dharma". Because of them Tibbet, Thailand and so on countries were separated from "Bharatbarsha".
3:09 yes, combodia is an example..
Sanatan samiksha best channel
There is rigid caste system in Sikhism. Jatt Sikhs won't eat in the homes of Mazbi Sikhs. In fact in many places there are separate Guudwaras for Mazbis. That is one of the reason for cropping of cults like Dera Sacha Sauda.
Buddhism is not a religion. Buddhists are a group of people among the sanatanis who followed Gautama buddha teachings. This is also same in respect of Jains.
❤❤ True
Good video
🎉🎉🎉❤❤❤
Read about angkor wat temple.you would know who did what
THOSE BUDHHISTS WHO TALK OF IT BEING DISASSOCIATED FROM DHARMIC TRADITIONS ARE DIVISIVE.
Around 3:10 he says Radical Buddhist missionary destroyed Hindu temple. Any reference ?
Even without knowing that such an argument that Buddhist Aaraamas were occupied and converted into Hindu temples are in the air, this thought suddenly came to my mind when I analysed the names of Five Shaiva kshetras known as Panchaaraamas in Andhra - Daksharamam, Bheemaraamam, Somaaraamam, Kumaraaraamam and Amaraaraamam all the names ending with aaraamam which is principally used to describe a Bouddha kshetra. I felt whether they were Buddhist sites converted to Shaivite temples when the staunch Shaivites Cholas and Chalukyas came to power in this region of Andhra Pradesh. I may be wrong and my argument may be preposterous. I am a Hindu and not a Buddhist.
Don't use Pakistani Logic. who is born in 1947 and think the world didn't exist before 1947. You are comparing Shiva and Buddha timeline here
That's a very interesting observation.
Its very difficult to reach the truth , because its long last and also most historians are biased .
They are either Left or right.
That is a fact-- where's the reference?.. 😅😅
Stifling your claim with another claim 👏🏾👏🏾
Are bhai....sirf batee karoge, ya kuch action bhi loge (bas ek level baki hae😅😂..very funny).....Now, ask ASI to dig dip so that contestation gets settled once for all....till that time, read kalam sutta.....peace !!!🧘♂️🧘♂️🧘♀️🧘♀️
Hope he is clear about the semetic religion !!!
"I say that in this sense God does not dwell in some of the temples. Or if He does, it is only as much as in a brothel. If this statement of mine has hurt any Hindus I am sorry for it. But for the sake of truth and Hinduism I cannot either take away from or add to my statement.” (Gandhi Research Foundation). Why did he say this? You can run but not hide.
No one is running. Gandhi was a Buddhist follower anyone can easily figure out by seeing his actions. His non-violence cost a lot to Bharat. If there were no people like Subhash Chandra Bose then British would have never left the Country. Gandhi was a weak man. He had no knowledge about "what is Pranpratistha". God or the substance of creator is everywhere but to worship we create a place and with vedic science the energy invoked in an idol. That's why that place is more pure than Brothel.
H
Utter nonsense... ancient Hindus never constructed temples as the primary worship of ancient Hinduism was yaga nd rituals...it was Buddhist who first started temple nd Buddhist diety worship..nd Hinduism picked it fron there..
Ashok's son and daughter Mahendra and his sister Sanghamitra destroyed many temples .
That's not true. Temples in their majestic form were created after the Vasudeva movement, which officialy started the worship of King Vasudeva ll, whom we today know as Lord Krishna. The Vrishnis, Pandyas, Cholas, and some other Vedic tribes have many a records of temple building.
The Vasudeva Movement/Vasudevism/Early Krishnasm started way before Buddha or his disciples were born.
How can u say such things with so much confidence like u were there?
Is there any way to shut him down for the welfare of United India?
What are you talking about ? If you want united then understand what he is saying, and go and have a talk with do called neo Buddhists and see
@@shaldavya if I talk, I will only talk about what and where I belongs to.
Free speech bruh.......
@@yugandharatammana4434 But it shouldn't violate Section 124A or Section 153A or Section 153B or Section 292 or Section 293 or Section 295A
@@yugandharatammana4434 These sections should be revised to add anchors who are tempting to make people answering this way. High court Recently said this.
Let’s bring back our glory of hindutva and we Brahmins should stop these lower caste from rising in the name of Buddhism.
It is because of people like you that lower castes are leaving Hinduism and converting to every other faith.
What he exposed was by another lie
Tirupati balaji is a buddhist shrine
All Nath's temples are also buddhist origin.
This guy's speaks wearing jenau ,protecting their herd
Tirupati venkateswara temple was built by Tondaman charavarti, venkateswara is not a budda murthy. Venkateswara and 12 alwar statues look like Buddha statues but they are not Buddha statues.
@@aerrojukrishnamachary9217 y do they look like??
Stolen??
@@chandramohan754 they are all imaginary idols like Buddha.
@@aerrojukrishnamachary9217 imaginary are in imagination but they are exhibited inthe form of art , expressing importance of their era .
Such things cannot be reciprocated unless and until their ideas are stolen or modified to bring their downfall .
@@chandramohan754 Sir!buddha's all idols also imaginary, Buddha's first idol was created in the kanishka's period, that was the copy of Unani deity of Greek.
He does not show any archaeological evidence for his arguments. Sounds like a Bramin promoting Bramhinism as expected
As if sir, you are presenting any evidence right from st.thomas visited India.
You have no idea and are completely brainwashed by leftist perspective. He has spoken on numerous occasions while quoting evidences from various sources with accuracy.
Who is that buddist radical who destroyed temple?
Sinhalese and Bhutanese.
King Ashoka
@@bhaskaranthangaya1078 please cite your sources.
@@arjyachatterjee6874 please be specific and cite your sources.
@@jayakrushnasahoo4403
Ashokvadan
Maturity is realising the dhamma lipi( jainism and Buddhists literature's language, ashoka's inscription language) was developed much earlier than the sanskrit (devnagiri lipi)..
Buddha and mahavir faught their entire life only and only against the vedas and brahminism (because this was the only religion prevalent at that time)
You see swami Vivekananda has mentioned that jagannath puri is Buddhist temples camptured by hindus(term came in 8th century)...
Huang san the Chinese traveller when visited saket(present ayodhya)
He described Buddhism was glowing at that time in that area ...
Alexander Cunningham discovered 3 Buddhists sites there(and shameless santanis tried to claim that too)
The ram charitramanas which you guys read today was written in 16th century.
NOTE:- I am not here to hurt your religious beliefs but i as a thervada Buddhist can't tolerate brahmanisation of Buddhism.
Brahmins have created a lot of mess , you should realise this.
Why they are against Buddhism are they insecure
Why you can't hear, are you deaf?
He's against the weaponisation of Buddhism by politicians and people with anti india agenda, not the religion itself. Bhagwan ne buddhi to di hi hogi, thoda use bhi kar liya karo.
Why you bheemtes are against Lord Rama and Brahmins ?
@@arjyachatterjee6874 Rama was ordered low caste to killed because he worshipped Shiva and doing tapas , bramin who give this advice this why we don't consider him as God not good human he don't own mind to think what is right or wrong, don't even ask why we hate Brahmins and their existence
@@arjyachatterjee6874because ram was ordered low caste to killed because he worshipped Shiva and just doing tapas bramin can't stand growth so called low caste
And don't ask why we hate bramin
Inki ramayan new york times se lekar Bbc ne dikha di with title mythical god raam temple inauguration aur India me ab jyatadar log saare kalpanik Patra ki original book padh rahe hai aur inhe pata chal gaya ki bharat me sirf budhism hi tha Mughal ke darbari Brahman, angrezo ke chatukar brahman to ye sab abhi propoganda kar rahe hai lord Buddha's kshatriya the aur 9avtar the😂😂😂bahot sarre youtube channel South se lekar north Tak ye dikha rahe hai inke ramayan Mahabharata ved padh padh kar
Then said to asi please deep dig that layer also so that water and milk can be separated.
King ashoka built 84000 stupa , those were destroyed by Pushy mitra shungh who follows bramhinism.
Kuch bhi gyan gapod do kaun check krne ja rha 😂
and where it is written and who wrote it? Travellers
@@Mr._Right friend go and read history from book not this such type of whatsaap university professor.
@@vishalkumargautam8365 Bro the part of history you are talking about is absolutely messed up by Leftist Historians. They just wrote story without any scientific evidences. Even evidences behind these stories is also asked by Court many times but the reply of these historians were they have none, even CBSE gave same reply. So i listen a lot of podcasts on this and google search then i try to conclude, Instead of Blindly believing on Textbooks.
❤❤
Lets understand Jainism & Buddhism predates Adi Shankaracharya who made vegetarianism and satwik Brahminism. Now we can do arm chair arguments but those days the lower castes wanted some god like person to enlighten them. Jainism, Buddhism and later Adi Shankara did what others could not in human form. Now Mr. Vishnu Jain is fighting for Krishna Janmasthan for decades. We are all one, Jainism and Sikhism are sects basically. Even Buddha was a born Hindu and he promoted ahimsa which all of us Hindus are proud of. I do not think Buddha ever said replace temples, his followers who were kings would do it after he expired. I am a Brahmin but I support all 4, Buddhism, Sanatana dharma, Jainism for its utmost love for living beings and we should support Sikhs. This argument of one upmanship is uncalled for, it will only fuel others to drive a wedge among us. Sai deepak will create problems even among a united family with his doubtful mind, even Bhagwad Gita shows Buddha as an avatar but we belittle the lord for the sake of argument. We should feel proud of his holiness, we may not agree but he was an enlightened one. Saved billions of living beings from war, butchery and gluttony. He was an apostle of peace.
You are right but u misunderstood Sai Deepak . He is voicing his concerns of today's political forces using the deeds of Buddhist Kings after the nirvana of Buddhaa , to create a rift between Buddha and sanatan Hindu , he exposing those political forces he is not creating any rift
What about Buddhist king Ashoka war against Kalinga ( Orissa).
@@bhaskaranthangaya1078 Please know Ashoka was the greatest ruler India ever had, in his vast kingdom killing & eating any moving being was a crime. This is after the war he renounced all violence and became the most just ruler. Took Ahimsa to the highest level. I have even visited his rock addicts and all of them are of his time. Let us see all these 4 religions as ours, not as independent ones.
@@shreepadpurkar9835 I wish you are right, and support what you wrote to a large extent. We all come from the same Sanatan tree, Foreign religions came here only because we were infighting and showing supremacy on castes over our own.
No dude, There's no mention of Buddha in Bhagwadgita, cuz the war took place much before Buddha was even born lol.
He's not creating problems among the family, hes in fact against the people who are trying to create the conflict among the family members by turning one against the other.
The shit that comes out of the mouth of sai deepak Iyer is deplorable
Not as deplorable compared to
s h i t
Lampetkar wrote
@@adrianbelko7683 you kiss your mother with that mouth?
Dear @bunty396, You have every right to criticise Adv Sai Deepak, but please do so using parliamentary language. Truly, SC Panda
Historical statements by a lawyer not by a ln archaeologist should not be accepted blindly. He's a biased opinionated person. He himself admitted it.
He gives refference in every and each arguments .
Remember in last 60 - 70 years I have not seen any educated hindu oppose Budda philosophy . Now a days some political buddist ( beemte ) crossed limits . I would like to ask about Buddhism to persons like Dalai Lama . Neo buddist are not buddist at all .
3 nahi poore 40 lakh return lenge
See the few common points in Buddhism and Islam .... No idol worship and no rebirth and no soul concept , concept of conversion, converting the kings and forcing them to follow their religion and forcibly implementing on people , sending missionaries for conversion .... These all are same in Islam and Buddhism .... So sanatana followers fought against buddhism to re establish santana culture, in same way we are fighting against Islam and missionaries to re establish the sanatana culture ......
Ha ha
You have gone to far
Buddhism is philosophy
Islam is violent cult