Do You Need 400 Megapixels? Fujifilm GFX100 400MP Pixel Shift Tested!

Is It Worth Shooting 400 MEGAPIXELS ?
here a google link for all the original 400mp raw file incase you want to have some fun !
drive.google.c...
Follow Jayz:
...
Whether you’re a student, freelancer, or even production house, Lens Library aims to give access to the best and rarest of cameras, lenses, drones, gimbals... you name it...all without the cost of buying and maintaining! Lens Library - democratising photography gear for all.
Follow us :
INSTAGRAM : / lens_library.co
FACEBOOK : / lenslibrary.co
Thank you for watching !
DISCLAIMER : This is not a sponsored video
For business enquiry:
[e-mail]
shot and edited by: / buoyiang

[@lenslibrary]

here a google link for all the original 400mp raw file incase you want to have some fun !
drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Bn2jN36TfxoL-E3bI4wmImhnZc-8-Q6q?usp=sharing

[@zy_cheng]

I need the full-length documentary for that piece of artwork in the background. So much emotion on one canvas!

[@lenslibrary]

The artwork by Jayz is currently up for bid 🤣

[@Stefan1968ful]

This is simply blowing everything away I ever had before. I never regret the money I spent on this camera. It is unbelievable, my Landscape photography completely changed with this camera. Pixel Shift brings this to another level, I am anyway mostly not static subjects here, so this comes in handy.

[@normansteinmetz643]

Hi, as I'm not a owner of the GFX100 yet (GFX100S preordered), I wanted to ask if the pixel shift is actually working fine if there is wind on location. I have a RRS tripod which works fine for long exposures but got confused as soon as some CZcamsr said that even the smallest movement (wind for example) makes the photos useless.

[@Stefan1968ful]

@@normansteinmetz643 Well, you better have no wind or any kind of movement in your scene. This moving portion is blurred later on what can look weird. But for my landscape work this is not any issue, typically there is no movement. So it depends on what you do.

[@normansteinmetz643]

@@Stefan1968ful thank you Stefan! Without your answer I might have never tried it due to the other comments I read.

[@st.michaelthearchangel7774]

Epic! I legit thought your painting was something you did seriously, because it looks really cool.
Would love to have that camera for macro photography! :)

[@lenslibrary]

finally ! million thanks ! we do try out marco , nothing to spectacular as this is no the purpose for that. to see beyond marco u need microscope , its optics :)

[@guansam9005]

3:05 I hope can see the full version of that film, so dramatic!

[@lenslibrary]

This is highly p&c 🤫

[@2ndBirth]

Definitely got my eye on one of these second hand now. The lenses are also quite pricey, I'd need to allow another £1k or more per lease on top of the camera. But it would be great for photographing artwork to make prints.

[@charlesnetzler2262]

Thank you for clearing this up before I took a 2 hour drive to take some landscape photos thinking I could get some amazing crops on the 32-64mm as its the only lens I own for this camera.

[@stefanmayer444]

Good painting! I like it 🙂

[@albavin92]

Let's battle with a7r4 pixel shift!!!!!! 🤘🤘🤘🤘

[@joonhaotham908]

Agree agree

[@lenslibrary]

This is interesting but we all know how it gonna end 😉

[@EdmondStreetzz]

it is mindblown by the image quality

[@lenslibrary]

Yea , Image size 23296 x 17472 💥

[@HelamanGile]

Yes the anwser is yes

[@guansam9005]

Dope and funny opening 🤣

[@flying10001]

Very very very detailed and nice review

[@lenslibrary]

Thx u , appreciate it very much 😎

[@florianlightspring2274]

Yes I need the whole rich stuff!

[@ProFocusPhotography]

Nice painting!

[@quickstrike209]

Now let's apply Adobe super resolution

[@amirrosli3576]

I just wondering..why this technology not applied into fujifilm camera model? I think its more advntage to apsc camera to make more resolution for certain needs..i hope fujifilm will do it..

[@zanfirc5639]

Omg when i see that sensor exposed.....

[@Michiop]

macro lens?:D

[@Weedeogram]

Is it necessary? 400mp...

[@unstanic]

Super necessary....

[@nelsonclub7722]

Very super necessary

[@Joshua-by2mp]

Very super duper necessary...

[@GeraldDonovan]

A little late discovering this video, but once again we are presented with 400MP pixel shifted files that show very obvious combing artifacts in areas of high spatial frequency.
It just amazes me how you could put all this work into taking the images and creating the video, yet be seemingly blind to the fundamental flaw in the way that Fujifilm have implemented this technology that, frankly speaking, renders the results worthless for their intended use.

[@kaitodesu]

really should have invited Wesley Wong from giclee art to talk about this feature

[@AntonisK]

resolution chaaaaaaaaaart???

[@JxcksonSF]

too bad that youtube compressed your video way too much, but i really liked your video

[@lenslibrary]

Yea , thx for understanding! U can download the original 400mp photo to hav fun :)

[@Niky_Blox]

wae