The King of Exploitative Poker - Giant Bluffs with Jonathan Iftarii Jaffe, WPT Champ
Vložit
- čas přidán 18. 08. 2019
- In this clip from a recent PokerCoaching Q&A Webinar, Jonathan Jaffe gives us an in-depth look into the way he played this hand, deep in the 2013 WSOP Main Event. It's always fun to learn from the best!
For all of my PokerCoaching members, the full replay is in the Coaching Webinars Classes Section of pokercoaching.com.
Let me know if you have any questions!
Test your poker skills with this quiz on 3-Betting Concepts: pages.pokercoaching.com/3-bet...
Do you play Online 6-Max Cash Games? If so, check out my FREE Implementable GTO Charts: pages.pokercoaching.com/6max-...
If you're looking to take your game to the next level, start your Free PokerCoaching Membership at pokercoaching.com
Make sure to subscribe for more Poker Concept Videos, a Weekly Poker Hand Analysis, In-Depth Poker Strategy Videos, A Little Coffee, and much more! - Hry
![[柴犬ASMR]曼玉Manyu&小白Bai 毛发护理Spa asmr](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/0TsXQ7z2Dh4/mqdefault.jpg)
![MASTERING Heads Up Poker Strategy [EPIC Battle & Analysis]](/img/n.gif)
Diggin the 2 person hand breakdown. Sick to hear the level of thinking on this hand.
This was super entertaining to watch with the actual players explaining their thoughts with analysis talks in between. Very good video!
Excellent analysis, Jaffe! Great thought process.
This is pretty much the same situation you had in your daily poker hand video. Nice to hear the in-depth thinking and "extra" information outside the range assessment.
Pleeease make more of these WSOP main hand reviews. Even the older clips are great!
Awesome, I'm glad you liked it!
Who's the interviewer? 😉 He has a recognisable voice and sounds quite knowledgeable about poker! 😄 More really informative content. Ty J & J. Btw, this formay of asking questions a less experienced player may ask is REALLY EFFECTIVE!
Wow I sure wish I could play poker like this and not just wait for kings because the rake is 3bb and then hope no one hits with a3o.
Glad Jaffe realizes its a bad call on the turn even though he won the hand.
I'm interested as to why Jaffe isn't 3 betting Q5s preflop. Doesn't this represent the bottom of his calling range? Flatting Q5s seems like you're going to be taking a weak line with a dominated hand when you don't spike a 5 or a flush draw on the flop.
If you were to develop a balanced leading range on the flop you would want to use premium made hands and draws. It's much better to check/call with marginal made hands.
@@PokerCoaching But why just call preflop? Q5s seems like a hand that you raise or fold.
@@kylelooper2156 I imagine, it has something to do with the fact that Annette is UTG. So her 3-bet folding range is going to be pretty small.
Also. in the beginning, they mentioned they disliked both options of calling and folding. However, they agreed calling was the lesser of the two evils. I imagine they would say, even though raising had some merit, it was not an appropriate spot to raise vs UTG open.
Nice content. I would like to pause for a second
Is this a spot where the big blind could raise everything in their continuing range?
no coz ud be way over bluffing and OR can just call down v easily
@@aszneeskutnu5604 The reason I ask is because even if your opponent knows your check raising light they are likely to misplay a lot of their range. I could see people calling too much or way over folding
@@gb6093 This could be, but if you don't know exactly what you're exploiting (either them calling too much or overfolding) then it is better to stay balanced, raising with some premium hands and draws and calling much of the marginal hands and some traps.
@@PokerCoaching That makes since, I have just been trying to explore different theories and ways of thinking about the game recently. I have a theory I refer to as "Exact Stack Sizing" in which you appear balanced. In practice what you are actually doing is calculating the future size of the pot and future SPR to make unbalanced plays that end up being ways of gaining extra value by putting yourself in spots where your opponent calls your value bets more and folds to your bluffs more. That being said I play live low stakes so I get to do some pretty weird stuff to make extra big blinds.
@@gb6093 yeh until u have idea which way ppl will deviate, xr entire continuing range could be recipe for disaster. if u play live low stakes ppl will likely overcall down so if anything i feel like xr entire continuing range is a poor adjustment
Don’t try this at your local vfw hall
You can lead on 256, can't you?
What am I supposed to learn here? How to get lucky playing hands I should’ve folded? lol I know I’m a smartass but honestly I thought this was about teaching people. This play looks like micro stakes on ACR... Even exploitative play should make sense. Hopefully one day in the future I can review this and see something of value I might’ve missed today. #MrUnpopularOpinion
Hearing the way Jonathan Jaffe analyzes the hand and talks about his opponents choice to bet (why it's a bad hand to triple barrel and even bet on the flop) and why he wouldn't make the call today were some cool things I learned from this hand.
@@PokerCoaching I think what I enjoyed the most was hearing the thought process on why he put in the check raise. I think its easy to get tunnel vision in this spot like you guys were discussing and just think about hero calling or folding given your opponents aggression. Was really interesting to hear the logic behind why the river bet here actually eliminated a lot of the drawing hands (89 etc) from her range which then allowed that card to be used as a good bluffing card for the BB check-calling range. Just a good example of where a little extra patience and thought in a hand might allow you to see a new avenue to winning the pot.