Game-Changer: Will Toyota's Water-Powered Engine Replace EVs?
Vložit
- čas přidán 15. 05. 2024
- In this video, we explore the potential game-changing technology from Toyota - a water-powered engine that could potentially revolutionize the automotive industry. We discuss the implications of this new technology and its potential to replace electric vehicles as the go-to environmentally friendly option. Join us as we delve into the details of this exciting development and its potential impact on the future of transportation. Don't miss out on this groundbreaking discussion!
TimeCodes:
00:00 - Intro
1:56 - The reason why Toyota a leader in EVs didn't continue its EV engine
3:30 - EVs and their issue
5:41 - hydrogen engine and its complexities
9:02 - earlier water engines and their problems
12:45 - how did Toyota make ITS wats engine
14:04 - WHY TOYOTA ( OR JAPAN IN GENERAL) is an inspiration to the world Because during World War II,
19:56 - can the Toyota engine truly destroy the EV market. Is it that perfect is at a conceptual stage?
19:20 - Outro
😃 Affiliate Links -
🎮 My Gaming Laptop - amzn.to/49GLcxY - Věda a technologie
This is old technology and an an American inventor was approached by some auto maker to buy it and he refused then all of a sudden he was found dead. Stanley Meyer was his name.
I think the rices people want to kill him about their greedy
Exactly 💯
I dont know why content creators use TTS voices instead of narrating themselves. Even if youre a poor narrator i think that's better than a tts voice. Tts just instantly makes the video feel cheap and low quality. You dont see too many big channels that use tts. Some but its pretty uncommon. That's my two cents. I really truly mean I prefer a human narrator that is bad at narrating. It makes it feel like the creator cares and that is likable :) but if you insist on TTS, there are much better more human sounding tts engines out there
I agree especially when it comes to pronunciation...it can get very annoying lol i mean it's amazing tech however you're absolutely right i think it's just a bit of laziness IMO
Yep you had my interest unil you just went on about the steel fuel tank
'A few days after his "deef" ' real voices please.
There is the factor of not being able to speak english. Some of these creators don’t actually speak English and translate their scripts to have the bot read it. Translators are actually pretty good now.
Cheaper
It almost sounds like they are talking of a perpetual motion machine: Stored electricity electrolyses water into H2 and O2. The H2 goes to the engine which burns the H2 and the output generates electricity and in turn via motors, drive energy to the wheels. Generators attached to the drive shafts generate electricity which is stored in the battery and voila, the perpetual loop is closed, The trouble is, most of the energy from the motor goes to drive the wheels and a tiny proportion of this goes to drive the generators. If you run the generators hot the car won’t have sufficient energy to drive itself.
I can see that the car will work in theory but the thermodynamics will mean that a constant input of energy from outside the system will be required to drive the system. Losses along the way will reduce its efficiency and in the end it is little different from a stock standard EV. Be that as it may, I’m planning to replace both my cars in the next couple of years and both will be Toyotas.
I can imagine that you could use some of the braking energy of the car to produce H2, which in term could later be used to help fuel the ICE. The same way that you use the braking energy to recharge the battery in a Hybrid car. Thus improving fuel efficiency a bit. But you'll still need to fill up the massive H2 tanks in a H2 filling station to get you moving...
The H2 powered ICE seems simpler to produce, but no way that this solution is as fuel efficient in comparison to a Fuel Cell Electric car... and certainly not compared to a
Battery Electric Vehicle... If we only had good batteries... (fast charging, environmental friendly, lightweight, high capacity, price friendly, safe...)
@@erikbaeyens2043braking energy isn't free as it has to be put into that car's mass first as kinetic energy.
Too many people don't understand this principle. When I was a boy (in Noah's time) my dad taught me about motors, generators and transformers. With this knowledge, I conceived of a motor and attached it to a generator and then put a step-up transformer from the generator back to the motor. Then my dad introduced me to reality.
@@danperryy Dear Dan, sounds like your dad was a clever fellow. He understood the principle that there is no such thing as a lossless mechanical process. With multiple processes, the losses are cumulative. It’s basic engineering.
The press is doing a VERY LOUSY JOB when they totally ignore basic LAWS OF PHYSICS. ICEs are subject to Thermodynamics principles. Each and every ICE have inherently LOW EFFICIENCY - typically 15% on urban tráfico, 25% on the road at Constant speed. Huge heavy duty diesel engines may reach 50% if exhaustion heat is recovered.
"Green H2" production is even more innefective.
Most water electrolysers reach maximum 50% eff. When you feed that into an ICE, one gets a FINAL EFFICIENCY from 7,5% to 25% at best.
That's a silly WASTE of 75% to 82,5% of clean Electric Power.
The BEST OPTIO will always be DIRECT USE OF ELECTRICITY TO POWER WHATEVER MACHINE YOU HAVE
That's really old news and now again is being announced since the 1979 Ford Mustang.
Sending water into an ICE engine does more than "corrode the parts"..
Lol yes it's like worrying about getting shot in the chest because it puts a hole in your new jacket.
I hope that the water based engine takes off but if cars downsized by 30% that would also help so much 🙏🏽🤖👍👍
This is merely a basic transporter problem. Just convert ocean water into H and O (leaving the NaCl behind) and then transport both the H and O atoms to vehicles over the internet. The resulting emission of the vehicle would then be just water. It would be water grow turnips and water for your aquarium. All of this can be done at 125% efficiency to account for the transport losses in internet servers and the losses in the drive train. I read about the transporter technology somewhere on the internet.
The losses in the routers can be easily be avoided if you transport the atoms via wormholes instead. Or maybe with Elon Musk's Hyperloop.
😆
An American invented a water fuel. But look what happen to him? Toyota stole it....
Who cares? You just need someone with the size, resources and capabilities to bring it to fruition... People criticize Musk because Tesla started building off of someone else's technology. But Musk is great not for that, but for having the resources and the courage, and business acumen to bring it to fruition. Edison was like this too.
What do you want to happen? When the American inventor fails, or.. dies... No one is allowed to continue the task of proliferating that technology? It should die with them and never be touched again? They didn't steal it, they're picking up where it was left off.
Did they also figure out how to perform electrolysis above 40% efficiency? Even if it’s 100% efficient you can never get more energy from burning hydrogen gas than you will making it. If it’s 40% efficient then you’re just wasting 60% of the battery’s capacity AND you still have the same problems as an electric system.
At least you won't have to wait to charge
I charge my tesla at night @@ashypravs4866
But the wait to go anywhere will be infinite.@@ashypravs4866
You should know that hydrogen is 3x more flammable? Then Gasoline and Clean Burning!
Don't get me started on UCLA 2018 study on High Fructose Corn Syrup. ---How it slows down the human brain 25%
- That was only one Coke a Day!!!
Yet hydrogen is the most common element in the universe so hydrogen is the most logical. We have a very finite amount of oil cng and fresh water. What we need is to be able to use ocean water in these engines
This water technology was around for a long time and the guy that invented it got murder for it look it up on CZcams I was waiting for this technology to come out a long time I can't wait until it's on the market I'm getting one asap😊 and I know everyone is going to want one running on water is a dream come true.
Not the first. A guy in the U.S. invented a water-based engine in the 70s. The government was interested. He disappeared, and so did his engine.
If you are using hydrogen, you are better off with fuel cells.
Whats the deal with slapping TELSA around? Should slap DETROIT around for covering up the water engine for over 40 years!!!
It wasn't Detroit, it was the cabal and they killed the water car guy in the 90's
There is no water engine. Learn some physics.
The main problem is there is not Water-Powered Engine refuel station ,
At least the infrastructure is already built at EV stations, as in the sidewalks, the lights etc and the properties are already purchased. They would just need to add on to those which would save some of the costs at least.
Wikipedia it.! en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrolysis_of_water [ Electrolysis of water ]
It's not even that. The main problem is hydrogen weight compared to energy it could reproduce is aroud 4 to 5 times less than petrol and that's for the gas shape pure hydrogen so, if your tank size is for example 60 litter and you could travel around 400km with it, with the same tank size you could only travel around 100km at best or you need at least 4 to 5 times bigger tank size!
However there is a catch folks that the video doesn’t explain, it will require Poland Spring Water at 3.39 a gallon!
18:14 95% efficiency is way better than 35% efficiency of combustion engines. There are so many fallacies in this clip. Producing hydrogen on demand is old but has resurfaced during rising oil prices in 2022, when videos immersed on how to modify your motorbike or generator 😊
It's all totally flawed figures.
Generating the Electricity in the 1st place has a %loss then charging the Battery has %loss then converting the Water to Hydrogen using the Electricity from the Battery has %loss then burning the Hydrogen in the Combustion Engine has %loss..
That's an awful lot of % loss,es 🙄😭😭
Water is not flammable, and if you want to extract H2 from it, it needs so much energy.
So the rumor that Toyota creates ICE which is running on water is - khmmm - not really covers the reality.
H2 can be stored on about 700 bar (10.000 PSI) in a car.
and it is about 200USD to fill a hidrogen car's tank to full due to extreme expensive infrastructure and small usage. It is enough for 3-400miles. Shell closes its puplic H fuel stations in US and UK. Probably they did not see these fantastic videos like this.
ICE's efficiency is about 30% and it is true in case you burn H2 in an ICE too. That's why an expensive fuel is not a good idea to burn. It is better to use H2 in fuelcell and create electricity with about 60% efficiency. This electricity charges a battery and runs an electric motor. An electric motor is about 92% efficient.
Average electric car battery CURRENTLY generates about 6.5 Tons extra CO2 emission.
but because EV works so efficiently it needs 1/3 energy compared to gasoline engine for each mile.
This 1/3 energy would generate 1/3 CO2 compared to ICE cars, but because electricity can be created carbon free, TODAY EV-s fuel generate 1/4 - 1/5 CO2 compared to ICE.
And it can be just better and better while ICE gasoline's CO2 emission is not about to change.
Due to this a gasoline car creates much more CO2 during its whole lifetime than an EV car.
Spot on. That's what I was thinking. It felt like a lot of this video was lies....
Right I hate how ICE enthusiasts will use EVs carbon emissions and environmental footprint as a point against EV. They're really making a point against ice because they acknowledge environmental damage is bad by saying this, and ICEs do more environmental damage. Of course EVs aren't perfectly green. But they overlook the fact that they are much greener than ICEs when taking everything into account including the mining and the battery production emissions, etc. And you make another good point, this industry is in its infancy and by all accounts, EVs are projected to become much greener in time. Look at how much greener ICE has become even in the last 20 years and they still are worse, after a century of refinement. EV was greener right out of the gate.
The real comparison should be EVs versus the first ICEs.
This reminds me of the e cigarette/vape debate. The tobacco vested government and consequently, the general population, is so opposed to vaping, despite it being exponentially less harmful than combusted smoke, but you don't hear anyone critiquing tobacco. One day vaping will be hailed as a breakthrough technology that saved millions of lives. Or crypto which is far more efficient, far more conducive to equity, far less conducive for corruption, far more inflation resistant, etc. - the list is a mile long.. but it disrupts the banks and government's control over our money and thus has been hindered greatly.
But you can't stop great technology. It always wins in a democracy, eventually. One day we'll all be cruising around in EVs we bought with crypto while enjoying some fine, vaporized nicotine 😎 well ok the vaping is optional. The tide just needs to turn enough for politicians to start campaigning on the proliferation of these industries, which has, for EVs at least, started to happen. Crypto soon. Vaping although a less important topic is also starting to get politicians on board as people realize the benefits.
Take two butter knives stick them in a glass of water touch a 9-volt battery to the top of each butter knife -
Tell Me What happens to each butter knife on the bottom of them that is in the water?
I bet you you can burn the top of the water now,. because of the Hydrogen and Oxygen bubbling up to the top!
I believe somebody invented an engine that would run on water in the 1970s. However big oil and the automotive industry bought the patents for it and put it in a box somewhere.
Namaste. I was confused by your use of word "inflammable". T/R.
Where did you get all these mambo jumbo s ??
If you are storing just water, why do you need a coated steel tank. Wouldn’t a plastic tank suffice?
Many cars now have plastic fuel tanks for gasoline. You don't need steel.
Greeting from Latvia. Here is some Disadvantages. Producing small amount ow Hydrogen. Takes a lot of problem. With Filtering, Caring, Plumbing problems etc. Water for this Engine need be clean without any habit. And this water will cost a lot of money. This Water will Cost More then in Shopping centers, especially when Market cant be Filled for simple people in shopping centers. This solution not cheaper then Just Hydrogen Making in big Production :). Cheaper Energy from big production will give the Cheaper Prices especially when Logistic will come on play ground. And Hydrogen can be stored some were it will make Hydrogen cheaper. Simple Cleaned water with Oxygen Cant be stored somewhere. And just cleaned simple water must be released. Simple Water with Oxygen when it stored in one place will got have anther Biologic fundamental problems and must be released or be cleaned. And Other at South Where Sun was is hot, Biologic Fundamental Problems will be a lot more In Physical Table :). Here you must Think With not only about How it possible not only At North. But Think how it will be used at South, because Bigger Market Now is At South. :) Cheaper energy like Hydrogen Will give more benefits especially like in 1980 When energy was been cheep. More Will Come New Population and will be really big growing in markets. Especially in Japan or other places in the World. You can make Ships on that Technology but not in the Cars :). Japan got big potential especially now When you have big Demographic problems. Ilon Musk will just Smile on this :). And Other 1 Kg Hydrogen Can be Frosted and be defrosted :) and nobody Will blow up. Like at your Video.
4 liter 180،،good work Great work japani ❤
How it is possible a car 🚗 company started as a textile machine maker that make great cars 🚗😁😁 while US 🇺🇸 car 🚗 companies kinda go down 👎 the tube 😭.
Ev’s don’t require electricity made exclusively from fossil fuels. They can run on electricity made from renewable sources as well. Yes they pollute but less than gasoline powered cars
This is not the first water engine Grace chemical modified a ford mustang in 1979 and it worked perfectly then just as quickly disappeared.
3 letter agencies
Wondering when it happened to Toyota 😅
What? post LINK? Did it make thunder too?
Charles H. Garret did it in 1935 , reported in the Dallas Evening News on September 8, 1935,
@@JT-cf7dq Nope, it was real, but even the news station has wiped it. I went to college with his son. His father held a doctorate in chemistry.
Toyota is not the first one to do this. Sorry others have come before, and they were taken out for wanting to change the economy..... But Toyota does it, and it's OK? miss me with the Bs.
The first water engine was done back in the 80s. or 90s.
Background music is annoying on this clip despite being interesting to watch information wise.
Are you saying that the water engine. Would separate the hydrogen from the water and fuel the engine ?
First water engine? They’ve killed off quite a few people for making these before. This time it’s a company so might stick around. We’ll see. (And there goes water prices…)
Somebody please help me see what I missed.
So you drive to the station to get the electrical power you need to perform electrolysis on your tank of water, right? During that electrolysis, the water is converted to H2 and O2. Where does that H2 go to? If it goes into a tank, what about the time bomb problem they mentioned?
Or if it goes into charging your battery, for later powering electrolysis to split the water molecule for the H2 your engine needs, is that really more efficient than what Tesla is doing, using that battery power to directly power motors in the wheels?
Tesla
Electrical power ----> battery ----> motor ----> wheels
Toyota
Electrical power ----> battery ----> electrolysis, make H2 -----> engine & drive train -----> wheels
Just looking at the processes, it appears at least superficially that Toyota's way of getting the power to the wheels is less efficient. What am I missing?
I said many years ago- once they can figure out how to create hydrogen on demand within the vehicle the fuel problem will be solved.
If that’s really the case, we won’t find any water to drink anymore!
Toyota knows that electric vehicles are not sustainable, and they know that when the electric batteries are no good anymore what will they do with all those batteries. Water is the way to go! Love Toyota!!!!
They used to run cars on steam back in the day (or so I heard-not that I was there)
I like how the creator puts a subliminal message in there near the end. The word SCAM in bright red pops up for a split second. Does this guy work for the oil companies?
With nitroglycerin it can run or explode
Though water was a precious resource, one that the world is quickly running out of if you listen to the UN,EU,& usa.So trade one finite resource for another yeah...
Why not charge the battery by electromagnetic power ? czcams.com/video/J9b0J29OzAU/video.htmlsi=6VhKkVKaYBaG2AYh
this is not possible as a efficient process more energy is used for electrolysis than that can be used by an exothermal process if fact its very inefficient indeed.
Cylinders cannot compress,water how do you get,around that
Why cant you use something that occurs naturally and 100% efficient? Like the natural occurring rusting of my rocker panels and wheel wells of my chevy pickup?
Interesting. Thanks.
Yes it can run on soil, any place is fuel.
The US old guard shelved shuch technology is what I heard
I was always a Toyota driver...then on the premise that they wouldn't produce a junkers, I bought one of their eV BZ4X. Not a bad car overall compared to others, but does not meet the criteria for a useful 2024 EV. Very slow charge, less range, too big for what it does, so many small things they didn't get right inside. I think they put the same engineers on it that thought they knew about EVs because they built a great Hybrid. Take away the ICE and you have a completely different set of criteria and mindset. The dealers know nothing about them and are not helpful at all. When something goes wrong they say "the car is functioning as it was intended" and give you a long list of reasons why it might be doing something weird. Very disappointing - I, and several others I have met since who have bought them, would never buy another Toyota and now don't believe any of their hype.
tQ for sharing.....👍👍👍
Welcome 😊
Where does Toyota stand on the water engine? Have they proven the functionality? Is it limited on rpm/ power? Is there a big rust problem? Where are they in the development?
There is no water engine. Learn somephysics.
@@rogerphelps9939 learn some history.
17:41 A perpetual engine does not violate the laws of physics. A fallacy within a fallacy 😊
The only reason that it does not violate the laws of physics is that it is unrealisable and not capablre of a net power output.
Not all ev electric car charging points are not fossil fuel..
So water is gonna be a scarce commodity smh I think this is a bad idea
Its not the first car run on water
For many years past, normal people have been doing the same with HHOkits...nothing new. Just mainstrem cztching up.
The kits produce only small amounts of Hydrogen which boosts the octane level.
Japan we’re never innovators! But they were great “improvers and developers”
A Mini Nuclear Enggine Is The Best Solution Alternative For A Conventional Machine Vehicles Like The Mother-Ship Carrier or A Stealth Sub-Marine On The Mini Reactor Inside ; *THE NUCLEAR CAR* For A Next Century Without The Radiation Polutan Result 😊👌
Nuke batteries incased in synthetic diamonds can run a Ford 150 about let's see.. carry the 7 uh ..ho k one diamond battery about the size of 2 bowling balls can run medium sized truck for about 10,000 years
Why not skip this step and go directly for the "Infinite Improbability Drive"?
This reminds me of the DOE Yucca Mountain waste presentation and discussion in Las Vegas 25+ years ago. There, an opponent to the project, suggested putting the waste into a space shuttle and sending it to the sun.
Nothing new about this! My question is what took them so long and what has changed that makes them go ahead now when they didn’t before?
this is a future hydrogen Toyota Mirai / Yaris hydrogen enjine. hope have more hydrogen mobile station in Malaysia. if am rich will invest the hydrogen mobile station in Malaysia. this is future for next 50 years. zero emission. when have more mobile hydrogen station sure have more people buy Toyota Mirai in Malaysia. 225k ringgit not expensive cars.
Toyota has now 3 different "game changer" engines...
Some logic is missing - Japanese taxpayers already spent a lot of subverting hydrogen "clean energy"...
You can re-use the excaust water.
The worst people of Toyota spoiled my new car in their service station.
Feeling sad, worst service😢😢
This is not new its just new to Toyota. No massive company has ever tried use water engines as the oil industry controls them. The water based engine has been around for at least 60 years now.
Lol I said this before it got to that point
I CAN NOT HEAR YOU,, (( WHY IS THAT )),, Turn your audio up to 100% & I will ADJUST,, 3/16/24.
There are many English and grammar mistakes in this video, that should have been caught. It also would have been better if it were spoken by a human being instead of the computerized voice.
Thank you for your feedback. We'll work on improving the quality of the content, including grammar and narration. Appreciate your input!
It works
Sure ,,,and Mazda has. Diesel cycle gas engine ready to go,30% increased mpg……let’s see I been waiting 3_4 + years?
Kills 22,000 people? ARE YOU NUTS? SHOW ME!!
USA already did it
Fiat isn’t an American car it’s from France 🇫🇷 they bought Chrysler which was originally American but was last owned by Daimler (which is Mercedes or German)
If Toyota keeps on in this direction they will fail.
Combustion engine with water? What is combusting?
combusting hydrogen that is extracted from water
Only if it can be manufactured cheaper than battery. Most cars are removing rare elements. Hold on... this video is on hydrogen cells. Ok, so batties are dropping in price to fast, and it will never compete. Their are 30000 parts in those cars... vs 11000 ish in a EVs. You also don't need to transport hydrogen everywhere and build storage all over the planet. EVs just need fast charges to be installed. 80% of the time you have it full at home
19:03 ..."Nasa launched a plain in 2028"! 🤔
Oh Dear God,...please!!
Oh yes and once you run the sand in the water that you consumed what exactly happens to it what’s the quality of it because right now the last thing we need is to be going through clean water at the rate we’re going through oil. Can you envision where I’m going with? This headline reads no more water to drink on earth. Yeah, I may be going a little far here, but you know what nothing would surprise me anymore with corporate. And by the way, making a combustion engine car also burns up a lot of resources, so cut the bullshit. There’s losses both ways.
@bernl178 Bro, You Have to start your study from kinder garden😒😒
Dude the cars run on hydrogen not water. What you say about ICE is true though, and in fact ICE cars are significantly more damaging to the environment than EV and contribute more CO2 over their life including manufacturing emissions, mining, etc, including EVERYTHING for EV and ICE. No question EV is greener.
Maybe they invented the steam engine??
It takes you way too long to introduce your subject, so I gave you a nice thumbs down.
Persoanl ok ang hyadro kungaronong ang gagawa, ngayon kung bibili pa ng tangke o parang gasolina lang malabo...hindi maging succes yan...sigorado
You still have to use electricity. How stupid! And water will just become more expensive. Like gas it will become a commodity. This huge water companies will pop up. Water will be less free than it ever was.
No way
Not powered by water! Water is the product of the fuel cells powering the electric motor in the car.
I own a Lexus hybrid, and it is an amazing car in terms of comfort, reliability, and fuel consumption. Having said that, I believe Toyota's decision to hold off on EVs is a big mistake. They are now way behind compared to EVs from China, Europe, and Tesla. Making a video like this does not help the future of this once great company.
I see ad, I click away.
Lol dumb. So you click off of monetizable, aka, high quality content?
Get an ad blocker genius. Or use revanced YT for android. You sound like an iPhone user though so good luck.
💯👌👍
Well, every inventor back in the days were accidentally killed just buy inventing these stolen invention
Lie! not a water engine but a hydrogen engine you need energy to split water into hydrogen & oxygen. What energy does this use.
Yes this is a hydrogen engine
This sounds like pure B.S. if they are doing electrolysis to h2 burn , this is pure shit
Now listen friends, this video was created by AI, and as such, kinda sucks. Take that and add conspiricy theory into the video, and there you go, I could not watch to the end. It started to frustrate me, and bore me to deeeth, and now I do not know the seret of the water engine. oh no.
I don't care what you think. 🤨🤨
Is this just an AI video? It kinda rambles and makes no sense, really shocked that it eventually ended
They stole this from Charles H Garrett
This Video is Absolute Garbage and so is what they are saying.
Why bother converting Electricity to Hydrogen when you can just power an Electric Motor at far higher efficiency.
Did anyone notice The CarCare Nuts footage has been pirated aswell 😳.
🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉❤❤❤❤❤ yes
Separating hydrogen from water causes a burn able feul . By using a copper coils to heat the water and Separating the hydrogen gases .you get a burn .
We have torches thay can cut with hydrogen gas water
Dingle it is.
What a BS video. We have been doing thus for years it is called on the.
fly hydrogen generation. Two years ago we wrote to Toyota USA and told them to do this to their hydrogen engine. It is NOT a water engine
Impossible to burn water. Learn some physics.
Lol! You are a Genius!
The problem is a lot of naive people believe it is possible and that leads to uncritical belief in all sorts of free energy scams.@@skynik5488
8😊
Nothing new here!!
Just a joke
Toyota as a company has become a joke.Please tell me when they have will have a Hydrogen reFooling infrastructure !, Oh, this headline is CLOCK BAIT!
Toyota is not trickery. I don't think they would disclose a maybe.
Toyota's are the most commonly praised car by mechanics for being the most durable and longest lasting. It's pretty much a ubiquitous sentiment across the industry. Toyota's hands down are the longest lasting cars out there and I'd say the majority of mechanics would agree. It's a commonly understood thing in the automotive industry. You clearly have zero idea what you're talking about. Rav 4s and carollas will easily go 300k miles at a rate much higher than any other brand. Perhaps the VW Golf aside. Toyota's retain their value better than any car as well, going by Kelly bluebook figures. It's one of the most awarded car brands there is along with Honda and Mazda. Depending on the source the answer varies. But the Carolla has been the best selling car for the past 20 years or so, worldwide, for a reason (Until recently Tesla became the best selling vehicle as it has the ev market dominated).
So yeah you're pretty clueless. It's ok not to like Toyota's but to think they are crap just shows how completely ignorant you are about cars.
Also they created an EV recharging infrastructure. They can make a hydrogen one. They could add them onto ev or gas stations. Gas station would make more sense you can could just add a hydrogen tank/reservoir and reroute or add pumps to it. It would be costly but so are EV stations. I mean I'm sure gas stations wouldn't be willing to support a competing industry, but even then, they can flat out build an entire infrastructure for hydrogen. If the tech warrants the cost, what makes you think it's not possible? At that point it's not only possible it's inevitably. Creating the infrastructure is not at all the biggest obstacle at all. It's making the tech solid enough and getting the cost of it down. If they can achieve that, then they 100 percent will build the infrastructure for it. If everyone thought like you did with your pea brain, this world would be in the dark ages.
What you're saying is like before the mobile phone "lol but they don't have a cellular tower infrastructure"
There's already hydrogen refueling stations in California. And other parts of the world. But I think what they're suggesting is you would not need that. You could literally put water into the tank and it would create an electrolysis creating hydrogen. The idea that once the hydrogen hits air, it would turn back to waterand then be a perpetual recycling system sounds intriguing, but I think you would still have to refill with water every once in a while. But you were not need a gas station or anything. Just fill it up at your house from your garden hose. what am I missing here?
Burning hydrogen in air doesn’t just create water and CO2! Air contains nitrogen and thus combustion in air creates NOx ( oxides of nitrogen ) pollutants!
A continued push towards increasing the percentage of Renewables in our energy mix and thus cleaner and cleaner electricity for BEV should be the goal. Its early adopter days for EVs and given personal transport is the western world’s biggest contributor to CO2 emissions and linked to city air quality issues it’s the right place to start with our electrification/ decarbonisation journey.
Inflammable means "not flammable."
Flammable and Inflammable both mean combustible.
@@olsonspeedcorrect. That is a bit of an English oddity, granted, as the prefix "IN" typically means "not" but in inflammable it is derived from a Latin prefix, of the same letters (in) meaning "into". The real antonym for flammable is nonflammable.
No it doesn't you goof.
This is really stupid.....