After numerous questions and comments about amperage measurements and circuit breakers, I decided to disassemble the original circuit breaker from this planer and overload it with twice the rated amperage: czcams.com/video/24f-J0lVo-E/video.html. Thanks for keeping me on my toes and challenging anything that doesn't sound right, it makes this channel a lot more interesting for all of us. Fun fact: This video resulted in Byrd Tool Experts (a distributor of Byrd Tool Corp products) contacting me for an interview, which you can see here: byrdtoolexperts.com/the-snekker-show-interview If you're looking for an installation video, your search is over: czcams.com/video/8J0rvBi8a0k/video.html
Sorry for being late to the party. So to clarify, are you certain that the amperage was 27 amps? and 31 amps for the different cutters? Okay, I just found the video where you clarify and prove the amperage draw very clearly here: czcams.com/video/24f-J0lVo-E/video.html at 21:00 minutes. There is a tremendous load on a tool that has to remove that much material, versus a tiny 3/32" wide saw blade. I measured my Grizzly 1 1/2 horsepower, 17 amp, 120 volt table saw motor. The measured current was only 10 amps with no load on it. This explains why I was able to use my table saw for hours at at time on really old knob and tube wiring in my old farm shop. The rating on the motor is obviously the "full load" current. My mind is blown, that a planer can draw 30 amps and be rated for 15 amps full load current.
We recently lumbered a 36" maple, a 36" white ash, and a 32" pecan. After drying, we tried planing with a Rigid (Home Depot) 13" planer with 2 HSS knives czcams.com/users/postUgkxIzvvTi3_Qc8JnVdYYRJCvuoDC4QjTzeL . This job was clearly too much for that machine. The pecan was particularly difficult, due to heavy mineral deposits, and a sharp pair of HSS knives would be consumed by a mere 3 boards. We were also having lots of problems from chip bruising, due to poor dust collection. The shavings came off like straw and jammed in the 4" hose.We bought the DW735 simply to be able to run carbide blades, which worked brilliantly for the pecan. However, we found it to be a much, MUCH nicer machine. It was far more rigid than the "Rigid" planer, and far more accurate as well. But what I liked most about it was the dust feed. This machine has its own blower, which shreds the "straw" like shavings as they come off the cutting head and helps boost the shavings into the dust collection system. No more clogs! It's also nicely sealed so that the internals stay quite clean. This is just a well tempered machine that's a delight to use. It literally cut the labor in half. Just another example of getting what you pay for.
As a retired test engineer I appreciate the thoughtfulness and thoroughness of your tests. Concerning the difference in amperage readings between the newer DW735 with the three blades vs. the elder with the Shelix heads: The difference might not all be in the type of heads betwixt the two machines. Simply, the age disparity between the two machines might make up much of the differences in current draw per task. Bearing wear and tear, for one factor, might introduce enuf friction to cause much of the increased current required to do the same task as the newer machine. It would be most appropriate to compare the differences between the two heads (using your same methodology) on the same machine... either machine will do. That is to say: Either put the original cutter knives on the older machine and rerun the tests--OR--put the Shelix head into the newer machine and repeat. This procedure ensures that there is only one variable in play between the A-B testing... only the cutter heads are different.
This has been brought up a few times, and I haven't tested it yet, but I doubt that three years of hobby use would cause enough wear on the motor or bearings to account for such a large difference in power draw. Having said that, I've been wrong before, and I'm sure I'll be wrong again. If I ever switch back to the OEM knives, I'll try to remember to take some before and after measurements.
@@genebruce6321 the table might not be as smooth as in a new machine. Drive belts state and tension can also have something to do with power consumption.
In addition to comments already made, DeWalt might use a better quality motor. Who knows what component parts they source based on what's available at any time?
Spiral cutters are a nice upgrade and offer a smoother cut, but are also known to require a little more power vs the three blade cutters due to the space in between the 3 blades allows for free spin on the cutter head whereas the spiral cutter blades are constantly engaged in the material thus requiring an added amount of draw on the Amps.
It's the same reason PWM (pulse width modulated) circuits draw less power. It's very fast on/off/on/off. Which is essentially what you get with the OEM knives.
Thank you for the update my planer just past a year in retrospect, beyond warranty- upon having it repaired the high-end technician recommended never getting the Shelix head due to the high heat created beside the plastic parts in the DeWalt planer- you're far far better to invest in a commercial planer using consistently @higher level
@JonDunnmusician The planer has a thermal breaker in the front, which should shut down the motor before the heat levels get high enough to melt anything, regardless of cutterhead type.
8:15 - "Some people find that to be a huge pain in the neck." As a retired machinist, I laughed at this. I've routinely rotated inserts on facemills, some had up to 20 inserts. It only takes a few seconds for each one. Facemills, endmills, drills, etc. You just do it and get on with the job.
I wonder if the higher power draw and RPMs are possibly explained by the smaller diameter of the cutter. The smaller diameter will have a lower moment of inertia unless it is significantly heavier. It will also require more torque to provide the same force on the cutting surface. It would be interesting to repeat the test with the OEM diameter cutter.
I agree... also where the amp meter didn't really change much when wood wasn't going through I suggest part of the difference may be manufacturing differences in the planers themselves or just age/wear. Sometimes manufacturers have to switch up suppliers, and there could be a 4-5amp difference between those motors. Wear and tear - sawdust and bearing age both in the motor and blade could well account for it as well. Even if it's a PITA, true test would be swapping the blades and running the test again...
Years ago when I made roll top desks and other furniture for a living I had the pleasure of using a 52” planer with a whisper cut head which is real similar to the shelix. It was real quiet and very aggressive w no tear out. Could take off 1/2” at a time on 12” poplar.
Why I like the Shelix... Better chip extraction. The Shelix creates smaller chips than straight knives that are easier to extract. Easy and quick to change to a new cutting edge. But most importantly is the vastly improved cut quality over straight knives especially on woods with difficult grain.
I have to say this is the most well thought out video I've watched in a long time. You paid attention to volume (most don't) and your process was spot on when comparing both units. I wish everyone could learn from you how to make a good informative video. Thanks for your time.
100% agree. When I read I title, I thought - typical CZcams click bait. Then I saw it was 45 mins long. Thought - this could go either way. Extremely good video. Explained what needed to be explained, could skip through what was blah blah to me, but all the way through it was informative and stayed on point. Thank you. Extremely surprised on the amp draw. For me, it was jaw dropping. I'm in the process of refurbishing an older 12" jointer and swapped out the 4.5HP 3 phase motor for a Baldor 5HP single phase (230V). It's rated at 20 amps but planned on running 10 gauge wire for the outlet. Eventually the outlet will also power a [220v~240v] planer. After seeing this I think I'll go with 8 gauge from panel to outlet.
The machine has a 15 amp motor which is OK to connect on a 20amp circuit . Electric code allows up to a connected load of 16 amps on a 20 amp breaker. If you are pulling 25 to 30 amps the breaker would trip before you got a 3 foot board planed even on a light cut. Something is not correct.
Thanks for doing this video. I upgraded to a similar head (Lux), that's essentially the same as the Shelix. The end result is a much better finish, and the planer seems to have an easier time planing all boards vs the stock head. I don't doubt that the upgraded one takes more power, but while on my stock head I routinely blew a breaker, I haven't done so with this one yet. Expensive, but truly a great upgrade for the shop. Planing is now more of a pleasure vs nail biting anxiety time ;)
Yes, it’s simply not intuitive to me that a cutter that more evenly distributes the load to the motor would ever draw more current than a cutter that essentially pulses the loading. The louder sound of the straight cutters should have been indicative enough. As a final test, because the results were not intuitive (and he actually seemed to make that point), I think he should/could have switched the cutters between the two machines to remove the two base machines as a source of variance. Although the planers were the same model, it’s not to say that the 2020 model could not have had internal improvements to the drive or the motor, eg.
One more reason why the current is higher on the Shelix - is that there is overlap between the cutter head squares so as to not leave a line between them. So in effect you have more inches of knife edge hitting your board on each pass thus increasing the friction as the cutters pass across the board. Friction = Power draw! Based on everything you have said and what I understand I would still vote for the shelix every time! The sheer reduction of cutter head replacement and hassle it worth it! Thanks for the video! liked !!
The amount that overlaps will still only get cut once, despite being passed over by two different cutters. There might be a tiny amount of friction that the second cutter imparts as it grazes it, but I think that would be a negligible contribution to the current draw.
@@advancednutritioninc908 the surface area of the wood being cut is a fixed dimension,shouldn't matter if there is overlap in cutters as far as load is concerned.
@@jeremymyers5643 You could be right, but I was thinking there could be more cutter area rubbing the wood if there was significant overlap. More friction, more drag, more motor current.
This guy is no stranger to logical reasoning Oh, man do I ❤ his humour: "If I wanna run a ham sandwich through one of these, I'm gonna do that." 🤣 Great video - appreciate your diligence - Kudos.
I tested my old 12" Delta 22-540 which is a typical 15 amp planer. Start up current was just under 14 amps, and the no load running current was 6.7 amps. I ran an old 4"x 6" Hickory beam through it for the test. Under full load, taking a 1/16 cut off the beam, the planer was pulling just under 10 amps, as one would expect given the fact that it's a 15 amp unit.
FYI: I bought a metal detector wand. It’s about the size if a barbecue lighter. They’re about 60-80 dollars. But if you’re planning down old wood it’s a great investment.
For some reason, that's one of those tools that I've always wanted, but just never bought. I used to use a lot of reclaimed wood, and was constantly hitting wire brads and staples. Probably would have paid for itself ten times by now.
@@TheSnekkerShow : for sure. The price I quoted was Canadian dollars. So it should cost at least 35% cheaper. This is not a regular metal detector. It is short range only. This is what you use to narrow down the area when your metal detector goes off. So when you use it you have to be close. Small sweeps, you’ll get the hang of it.
I think I purchased mine back in 08 and it still works well for my needs. I don't use it often, but I've run everything from Walnut to African Mahogany to Purple Heart, and even Ipe. It's a slow process, but the machine works. If I were to offer anyone advise it would be to take your time and enjoy the process. This thing is anything but fast. I run with the OEM Blades and trash them when they're done. Before this planer I had a 22,000 lb Oliver Stratoplane, that's a different story. I enjoyed your comparison. Extremely well done! Thank you.
This is a very interesting video and comparison especially because I'm also an electronics engineer. As was previously mentioned, there are issues with the differences in age of the bearings, wear-and-tear, etc with the older planer. How much of a difference, or to what extent those differences would have a direct correlation to amperage draw is hard to say. Since one machine is from 2017 and the other from 2020 (I think that's what you said), there would obviously be differences between the two machines in terms of "burn-in", meaning that all mechanical aspects of the system are more or less "settled" (though of course, nothing in a mechanical system is ever permanently settled). Another consideration would be the possible differences in the motor efficiency between the older machine and the newer one: I doubt DeWalt would be willing to provide any quantitative numbers on either machine's motors in terms of efficiency based on their respective serial numbers (which could be traced directly back to a production run, etc). If the newer machine's motor (and other machines going forward) reflects a slight design improvement that increases its efficiency to do work, how would anyone know, except DeWalt perhaps. Also, there may be some unknown "minor improvement" in some other parts of the the system that could yield less stress on the motors and so produce less current draw. Too many unknown variables. Since your first machine has been in use, it's probably not a good test candidate to use as a DUT (Device Under Test) in a comparison because of the previously mentioned use/wear-tear issues. It would be more accurate to make a comparison between two of the same model machines, from the same manufacturing runs - if that's even possible, which I doubt - that are newly purchased together, and from the same vendor. But there could still be a question on the efficiency of the motors between two of the same machine, so purchasing two new machines is not a perfect solution, not to mention a costly one. It would be less costly to simply swap blades, i.e. put the stock blades from the newer machine into the old machine and see what the results produce, and visa-versa, put the helix blades into the newer machine and see what that produces then compare the results. Though this was not exactly a scientifically accurate comparison, I still think the comparison was revealing enough and was a very interesting video. Thank you for taking the time and effort to do this. And I hope you find use for the 2nd planer! By the way I am thinking of purchasing the very same DeWalt planner so not only was your video interesting and informative, I learned that there are after-market Helix blades (who knew!) and a bit about the internals of that planner as well ! I look forward to some of your other videos !
If your planer rate of feed is not adjustable, the increase in the amp test is partly because cutter edges pf the smaller diameter roller cutter is effectively traveling at a lower speed (FPM) and as a result is taking a larger bite per revolution, thus loading the cutting edge slightly more. Also, that style carbide cutter does not have the same type of razor edge as your standard planer blades; it is a slightly less sharp edge. If you run your finger along a planer knife edge length wise , it will cut you, those carbide inserts will not. Not a bad thing, but it answers the questions of why the motor sounds different and the amp draw is higher.
I somewhat disagree with the sharpness comment, as a machinist I fully understand edge prep on carbide but cutters such as this or high positives for aluminum work and generally dead sharp. Carbide deff can be as sharp as steel its just not the norm for metal work.
@@lockgessner Can be, yes, but as a general rule carbide inserts aren't as sharp as high speed steel tooling. It's quite uncommon for them to be sharpened from the factory. Typically they are molded and sintered and the shrinkage during the sintering process is what passes for sharpening (reduces the radius of the edge). As many (notably Stefan Gotteswinter within the CZcams / Instagram machinist community) have shown, you can sharpen your inserts to be every bit as sharp as high speed steel, but you have to actually sharpen them. Stefan built a low speed diamond lapping machine for that purpose. It is unlikely that anyone will be taking the time to sharpen all of their carbide inserts on all faces for a Shelix planer head.
I think there may be one other reason for the amp draw. Earlier in the video he said that the smaller Helix roller causes the plainer roller to push down more. That could create enough resistance to cause the amps to increase. Also look at the amps when he turns the machine on. The Helix roller rest amps are lower compared to the original roller rest amps. Why is that? Or maybe I’m just talking out of my ass because I really don’t know.
I think you’re spot on. I think the sharpness is the more important factor, though. One is an actual knife, with a 25 degree (or so) cutting edge, while the other is a carbide cutter with a 60ish degree edge. That makes the carbide cutters FAR more durable, but they will not slice as well. It’s like trying to slice a tomato with a razor sharp axe vs a razor sharp kitchen knife. They will both cut it, but the thinner edge on the knife will do it with less effort. If horsepower is not a concern, and you have a 10hp motor, who cares about a little more effort? But when you have a 1-2hp motor, it makes a difference.
I've had the same experience as far as circuit load. However, it was simple to manage; I just take smaller cuts. It cuts so much nicer, especially on figured grain, that it's no contest. The Shelix wins hands down, every time.........
I kinda wish you would have included light pass planing, like 1/3 turn of the wheel. I almost never take a full turn in one swipe when planing 5/4 stock and trying to keep the most thickness for the projects. Nice test though, especially the amp test. Wow.. had no idea I was drawing that much with it. My 20 amp breakers (new circuits) never blow.
Maybe something for a future video. I normally take light passes too, and have likewise never tripped the breaker in the panel. I've tripped breakers in the planer and in an extension cord reel, but not in the panel.
So the reason for the high current draw not tripping the breaker - they actually will trip, but it takes time. The board is through the planer before the trip time occurs. A 4x load will trip the breaker in about a second. A 15x load will trip the breaker really quickly. Breakers work through an element being heated by the current passing through them. After a certain temperature is reached - pop! I had to go find a Square-D trip curve for a residential 20A breaker. I learned something new.
I really appreciate you making this video. It answered a lot of questions. I recently bought the dewalt as my 25 year old delta was getting tired... or maybe I was getting tired of it 😉 I solved the tear out problem years ago by buying a thickness sander. I go to the sander with my material .0625" thicker than finished dimensions and take .015" per pass. As a small furniture maker the extra effort guarantees me a perfect product with no tear out. I subscribed to your channel after watching this first video... well done!!!
A true test of a planer is to run Osage Orange through it. Also known as Bodark it is a super hard yellow wood, prone to chipping due to it's wavy grain nature and hard fiber. I did two cutting boards today but still had to sand them down for almost an hour . Use a different color saw dust to rub into the chip outs to show it on camera with a single light source or the sun.
Any tool will draw excessive current if you overload it, which was the case here. A full turn of the height adjustment handle is generally too much for any hardwood. I do 1/4 turn increments and 1/2 turn at the most.
Here is an idea: With the Shelix head one (or more) of the cutters is constantly in the wood. There is no work relief between cuts. With the straight knives one (admittedly big) cutter is in the wood then you have no cutter in the wood for 1/3 of a rotation. During that rotation there is relief from some of the work load, the head can gain speed before going into the next contact.
If you think about power draw and amps pulled all equals to overload on motor and belt, so the wear and tear and all the parts will be more so most likely will get damaged faster than running the oem style
Agreed, the more you use a tool or the harder you make it work, the faster the parts will wear out. The same could be said of planing oak compared to pine, or business use compared to hobby use.
Excellent video. I am not generally interested in power consumption comparisons, because they are mostly focused on running cost. I was losing interest until I realized how the consumption compared to my breakers. THEN this became seriously interesting. Even after reading the comments here, I'm still confused about why the breaker didn't trip. The sizing differences of the spiral head was hugely non-intuitive, and I'm so glad you shed light on it. Thank you.
The video I linked in the description does a pretty good job of demonstrating, but the short version is that most breakers trip because of heat, not a number. 15 amps for 30 minutes could generate more heat in the breaker than 30 amps for 1 minute.
I have to admit that I am a little shocked at the amp ratings between the two. But not totally surprised. I recently installed the Byrd OEM and was wondering if I had done something wrong because it seemed like it was loading the motor more than stock. Now I see it is true. It is still a worthwhile upgrade and I have no regrets.
I love it, i explain to my wife on a regular basis i could use two planers. She isn’t biting yet, but i am coming up with new and creative ideas to justify having a second one :) I am enjoying the channel and puns. Thanks for taking the time to do this comparison on a serious note. I am in SE Asia and it is challenging to get the parts to show up, not to mention the mark up. So this information is welcomed and yes the original TR was much better than the newer one, although I didn’t mind watching the second TR. Quaid start the reactor… is priceless.
I thought about getting a helix cutter for my dewalt p[laner. I asked a dewalt service center rep if it really was as good as they claim. this is what he said " if you put that cutter on your machine then you void the warranty.'. He invited me into the back and showed me about a half dozen machines with burnt out motors. This planer is not made to handle the extra load one of these cutters puts on it. He said' if you have a belt driven machine like a jointer or a large size planer that is not a problem'. I stay with the standard blades.
Your hack @14:00 of shimming the spring will raise the roller slightly, but it does not reduce the spring pressure against the roller and board. You are effectively preloading the spring, you are not reducing the pressure. The spring will exert the same pressure against the board.
You're probably right. Over time the constant pressure might soften the springs a little, but I'm not sure how much. It's not a modification I plan on doing with mine.
I don’t mind removing the cutters. I would do that regardless. Thank you for this video. I went through 6 blades within a couple weeks. I don’t usually work with pine, but I have had a few customers who were wanting used lumber for their furniture. I always remove all nails, staples, and fasteners and run a strong neodymium magnet along the board prior to planing. However, I have been running into boards with aluminum nails. It is extremely frustrating.
I wrecked 2 bandsaw blades. So I bought a metal detector on Amazon, the same as the tsa use. Saved me a lot of money because I use a lot of reclaimed wood. Able to find many dinky pieces of steel.
This is the most informative perspective on the Dewalt 735 planer I have seen yet. Thank you for being so thorough and covering info that most just overlook.
The idea about shimming the rubber rollers to rest higher (14:45), seems unlikely to succeed. This is because the problem isn't caused by where the roller sits in relation to the cutter head when the machine is -not in use-. When the machine is in use, the rollers still have to move to the same place relative to the frame to allow the cutter heads to touch the wood. Pre-compressing the roller springs with shims will do nothing to change the force those springs exert -when in use-. There appears only 3 ways to reduce the roller head force: 1. Replace the springs with softer springs 2. Modify the machine so that the top of the springs somehow sit higher than they do currently (e.g., if there are shims on TOP of the roller springs: remove them) 3. Replace your undersized cutting roller with an OEM sized cutting roller. IMO Shelix should not even be selling an undersized version because it creates so many problems, i can't see how anyone would ever willingly make that purchase if they knew the negative effects it would have on the rest of the machine.
I’ve been a furniture maker fir 55 years . I’ve never wet the surface and I understand the premise, but I’m not sure that will work. I will try it. It definitely will big down the cut. Thanx for the suggestion
@@sphlouge I understand the hesitation but I went to one of the top leading schools for furniture making in the US and I was working with birds eye that was tearing out. Jerry Osgood told me to try wetting it a bit and it solved my problems. Being as he was one of the most famous woodworkers I’ve ever had the pleasure of meeting, I took his advice.
Excellent discussion! Well conceived, organized, thorough, and intelligently delivered. I installed a Shelix head on my 8” jointer and had planned to upgrade my DeWalt planer next. I already decided to go with the OEM size head and you confirmed my decision. I was thinking about your discussion of the warranty matter and I think that you also need to consider the entire drive train of the cleaner that is under higher stress which results in the motor drawing higher amps. So there’s more than just the motor in the thermal overload breaker to be considered I think.Thanks!!
Nice video, thanks! Regarding amperage draw, you may wish to measure the line voltage at your outlet. It can vary anywhere between 108v and as high as 127v depending on how far your house is from the utility company's point-of-connection transformer. With a higher voltage you can expect a lower amperage draw and, of course, vice versa. You may also want to check your breakers. You can almost arc weld with older Federal Pacific or Zinsco breakers and they won't trip, but most newer inverse time breakers will usually trip very quickly at amperage draws above 30 or 40 amps for 15 or 20 amp breakers respectively.
Because your rollers are so tight on the Shelix non-oem, I think you need to test the draw on the oem Shelix. That extra draw is probably due to how much harder it needs to work to pull the board through.
Fascinating detailed video- just a heads up a year after buying my Dewlat planer the motor died smoke... end It had carbide blades from infinity cutting tools and not too much use
Can't wait to see you run a ham sandwich through the planer. Its like Sweeps Week for CZcams, come up with the most outrageous content possible in order to draw in viewers. Ham Sandwich please!
VERY informative. I too upgraded to the Shellix but I did so on my 8” Grizzly joiner. The 16” Grizzly planer came with the Shellix but it also came with a 5 hp 220V motor. The Joiner came with a 3 hp 220 motor. I did find that the joiner loaded down more with the upgraded Shellix. The planer with the larger stock motor did not have any problems even with more aggressive depth settings.
A fair power consumption test would have you swap the heads and re-run. That would eliminate differences caused by other differences in the machines. It seems likely (to the point of obvious) that the additional roller force is adding friction between the wood and the bed, which causes the roller motor to work harder to maintain a constant feed speed. To confirm this hypothesis would require some method to ensure that roller pressure is the same in both tests.
Glad I stumbled on this. Very interesting. Confirmed my thought that planers with helix cutters should be spun on minimally 240v induction motors. Been on the fence about this same Dewalt or just overhauling my very very old currently not working Powermatic 5hp planer and this demo tipped the scale. So, rolling up my sleeves and getting to work on the old planer. Great work and information! Thank you.
I sure appreciate you posting up this video. I was very much surprised. I would have expected the planer with the bigger, stock head to use more power than the planer with the smaller diameter Shelix head. Very interesting results for sure!
Great Video tutorial. One way to determine actual pull or difference would be to measure the wood thickness before & after each cut to make sure they're cutting the exact same thickness. Just a consideration
I would put the original cutter backing if you need put it in for repairs. For one it would keep them from hesitating working on it or warranting repairs. Secondly if they replace the whole unit due to needing excessive repairs then you would likely loose your cutter head.
Sorry to be offtopic but does anyone know a tool to get back into an Instagram account..? I stupidly forgot the login password. I would love any assistance you can offer me!
@Marley Colin i really appreciate your reply. I got to the site thru google and im in the hacking process atm. Looks like it's gonna take a while so I will get back to you later with my results.
For AC power, AC current is not proportional to power draw due to power factor. This is the difference in phase between the voltage and current signals. Different loads can lead to a different power factors from the same device.
I would have liked to have seen the draw on your old machine before you switched the blades but that said a VERY good video. Personally as I would not throw out the original blades if I upgraded it, if it went wrong and I needed to return it I would just put the original blades back in first.
Ive had one of these planers for more than 15 years , always run it on a 15 amp circuit , run thousands of board feet of Oak , Hard maple , walnut and softwoods through it , and taken pretty heavy cuts , Ive run end grain cutting boards through it , I have never tripped the breaker on the machine or the one in the panel , I will put and amp meter on it to see what the inrush is and then monitor running current. I don't use Dewalt blades , I found they dull too quick ,they don't last very long. Dull blades will still plane pretty good but make it work a lot harder , maybe that's the difference well done video
I've got a brand-spanking new DW735 sitting in the back of my truck right now. I plan to put a helical head in it "just for the hell of it" but mainly to avoid any issues with end-grain and figured wood. If there's any issue that eventually needs to be taken care of by warranty, remove the helical head and install the original blades BEFORE taking it in for service. Simple. But you didn't hear that from me.
You're right, and others have added some good reasons for doing that. For one, if the planer is defective, the service center probably isn't going to carefully remove your helical head and send it back to you.
Awesome explanation... just a couple months too late for me as I've already installed and used the smaller cutter head without realizing the implications of that choice. Thanks for all the great tips though!
Got one coming tomorrow that I picked up for $450. If I ever get shelix the blade is going to nearly match the machine price. No rush for it at current prices.
44:34 - "i gotta figure out what to do with two planers,..." hahaha. first bad thought, Run them in tandem! Out of one and into the next! I or "rough" and fine cut machines, or this machine is for the mystery board with a nail ock in it. Worse yet, set one 90 degrees rotated from the first and you can plane small stock without turning the,...
I have the 734. No option for smaller cutter, so I had to pull out all of the inserts. It's not the end of the world. I carefully used an impact driver and the screws came out easily. I also stuck a wixey dro on my lunchbox and it's an absolute dream to use now 👌 The movie reboot reference was great, btw 😆
Notice the louder sound from the bladed machine. its moving a lot more air this staying cooler, I think the tungsten blades need a more positive rake, it would take away some of the pressure, it would be interesting to see what the chippings look like, how both machines compare..
That would have been good to cover. At around 26:03 you can see the smaller chips from the Shelix head, which are easier on dust collection than the much wider shavings from straight knives.
literally ran a set of straight knives for 2 years before I finally replaced it. First board i put through i hit a buried framing nail, all 3 blades are toast.
The amp meter going through a 10x multiplier and an extension cord will increase the current draw and decrease the voltage. To get a better measurement it is useful to measure the voltage at the planer plug when running the wood. It is very likely you were at 100 to 105 volts vs the 120 volts expected. That would increase current draw. You could measure the voltage only just to observe the drop under load.
Nice vid, good detail. I bought a set of carbide blades for my DW735 for a whole lot less than the Shelix (less than half) and they work great. I have had them for just over 3 years now and they still cut like new. I have run all hardwoods including some figured with no problems. I'm a serious woodworker and use the planer often.
What brand did you get? I bought some carbide knives for my jointer a couple years ago, and they still nicked before too long. Otherwise they're still sharp, but I've been replacing one knife at a time with steel to get rid of the nicks. I mill my own lumber, so that might be part of the problem.
The best review and comparison I’ve seen on here! Great job dude thank you for taking the time and showing the difference in power draw as well as planning surface quality! I’ve been through 3 of these planers this past month, the first one made a crazy rattling / death bearing motor noise after a dozen cuts as well as constantly got stuck with pine and cedar ( both had a decent bit of knots, never took cuts deeper than 1/32 at a time ) . The second one was ok at first, then I had to plane 9 cedar deck boards that were 8’ long. They had a decent bit of knots all the way down the board, and would constantly get so stuck that I had to push them through by hand with insane amounts of force. I thought cedar was soft… I guess any knots and it’s a no go. The rollers wound up getting worn out unevenly and even with pine that had minimal knots, it would constantly get stuck! I have not had a single dewalt tool let me down as much as this one. I had to force the cedar boards through because I needed to get the job done for a client ( custom shutters for their house ) Otherwise I would have stopped right away. The only culprits I could think of is; knots, and maybe a slight cup on some of the boards. I check to make sure thickness was the same all the way down on all these boards, made sure they were clean, made sure my rollers were warm, etc etc. The only thing is that I didn’t wax the bed.. I’m on the third one now which I just got yesterday and I’m honestly at the point where if I can’t figure out what I’m doing wrong I will give up and save my money to buy a bigger floor model planer. Any insight? Could it really be the knots + cupped wood? It’s cedar.. I thought that was softer wood, it did not have as many issues with pine although it did get stuck when planning wide (12”) boards. Please someone give me the rule of thumb on knots etc .. I’m bummed . These cost $800 in Canada.. not cheap especially for someone just starting to seriously get into this hobby while working for min wage. I’ve seen other videos where people plane wood with knots , and even in yours you managed to plane that small live edge piece which looked like it would be difficult, mine would just get stuck right away lol. Also it had a lot of snipe all down the board, and wouldn’t get stuck specifically where there’s knots, it was almost random and all down the board.. I hope this one works 😭😭 I even built a table for it already too..
Knots are nothing but end grain, and I've planed entire end-grain cutting boards with no major issues aside from power consumption. I'm guessing, of course, but it sounds like it could have been a couple different things: If boards are an uneven thickness, they can get stuck partway through. If that happens, turn the crank to raise the body until the board starts moving again. This happens to me all the time, especially when planing rough lumber right after jointing. Also, since wood moves more across the width than across the length, knots tend not to shrink as the board dries, and can protrude enough to make the board jam. Deck lumber sometimes has a higher moisture content, especially if it was stored outside. Wet wood doesn't slide across the bed as easily as dry wood. Waxing the bed is very important. The same motor that turns the cutterhead also powers the impeller and the feed rollers. Too much drag on the bed will rob power from the other functions.
Anyone ever tell you that you have a very professional voice? It is easy to listen to and could deliver radio or TV ads with as much professionalism as anyone.
Very thorough and enlightening comparison. The amp draws with the stock planer call the soundness of the entire design into question over the long haul. One point I think your viewers should consider is that the replacement heads give the manufacturer a reason to say "no" to warranty coverage, like the first response you got from Dewalt, which really was the same as the second. I think this would be especially true with the Shelix, given the fact that Dewalt probably has tested their amp draw as well. I could be wrong, but there is certainly an argument that the heads affect the motor because of the amp draw. This was the best video I'm aware of on this topic. Very much worth the remake. Thanks.
I just came across your video. I see it is almost two years old but just the same I am in the market for a planer and it was very insightful. I wish I had seen it sooner because I have several ham sandwiches that I want to plane and didn't know you could do that. Thanks so much for the help.
Pretty obvious you are not just a woodworker. Looks like engineering education. I am about to buy one and learned about Shelix. A good plane makes all of my hobby woodworking better. I am about to make perfect fitting kitchen drawers on roller bearing slides. Great video, unpretentious host with the intelligent thought behind it all. Very cool.
@@TheSnekkerShow I bought one yesterday and then was surprised how big the box was. I drove my car vs the Jeep. I'll build it in a wall rack so I can flip it up. When I picked the box up I realized how heavy it was. There are so many things I can use it for.
@@gerardlunow567 Congratulations, that's a nice addition. If you didn't get the extension tables, I'd recommend buying or building those to keep snipe to a minimum.
Got my DeWalt 735 earlier in the week (6/2021)and called Byrd today to order my shelix OEM cutter head. Requests are so numerous that they can't get me an OEM until Sept/ Oct 2021. WOW
Thanks for the updated video and caution about undersized vs. OEM. BTW, great that you compost, but be sure to add lots of greens/grass clippings to offset all that sawdust (super high in carbon) :-)
2 planers? use the "top half" of one attached to a "rig" that will allow the planer to move side to side and over the length of large slabs of wood to plane door and table sized pieces. I do think, based on what I could see of the the design of the DW735 in the store, that it is the right machine for that application.
Very well explained!! I also have the older model and have picked up several sets of blades on sale so I'll probly go through them before I upgrade to the Shelix!! Great video!!!
add a capacitor to help the motor stay at full speed....that is why the 3 blade pulls less amps essentially....the cutter head is not in contact 100% of the time so it can speed up....a capacitor charges to peak voltage and discharges....it will keep the voltage up and steady
They should just ship the OEM-size 735 Shelix with the cutters detached. Less manufacturing cost, less install time for the user. I must be overlooking something.
Thank You for posting this, I had no idea that to actually get the best job from this planer I should get the Shelix cutter head. Taking the cost of thos planer & get the best from it will cost an additional 500 dollars
It's definitely a nice improvement, but I've owned thickness planers for more than 20 years before getting this. Don't rush the upgrade unless you're sure it's the right move for you.
Great comparison video. I recently bought one of these planers as I gear up my garage but haven't had a chance to use it yet. Pretty certain my garage is on 15amps at the moment and I've already blown the breaker combining a portable ceramic heater and a shopvac. It'll be interesting to see how long till I need to call an electrician over to upgrade my garage breakers.. I have a feeling its definitely not going to cut it as is.
Yeah, that will be close, especially if you want to capture the dust instead of breathing it. There are some clever designs for filter cabinets to eliminate the need for simultaneous dust collection, but an electrical upgrade is probably inevitable.
29.45 if you're planing a lot of hard wood... you'd get a different planer. The DeWalt is very good on construction site for soft framing wood and similar. It can do hardwoods but doing a lot is job for a much heavier duty machine
Great job on this video. I have been running my 735 with stock straight knifes on a 15 amp circuit and have not had any problems with the circuit breakers, but I see I could not expect the same if I upgraded to a Shelix. I wonder how the 1/16 difference in diameter affects the load. Might be even worse with a stock diameter (wood cutting reaction force would have more leverage)
If you have to remove the cutters in the OEM head, they should just ship them loose and save you a lot of work. When I bought mine years ago they did not have the OEM head. I was able to install the smaller diameter cutter head without removing any of the cutters. I wrapped the cutter with the clear cellophane that came in the package and slid it in no problem.
Two concerns: First, when you add the device to separate the hot and neutral, instead of measuring the current on ONE wire, you are measuring the current on TEN turns (as the video said), and the reading is TEN times higher than the actual current. Divide the displayed reading by ten to get the actual current use. If the actual current had been 25-30 amps, the home circuit breaker as well as the planer breaker would have popped. I suspect the breaker on the planer that popped may have been defective. Second, the circuit breakers do not sense the motor's heat - they sense only the current drawn (they also do not sense voltage, only current).
Your first concern might be answered by some of the information in the video description text. You are correct that the breaker doesn't detect the motor's heat, the breaker detects its own heat. I'm making a separate video about that topic, which I might publish tomorrow if time permits.
First, great videos! The length of the extension cord makes a difference regardless that it is sized properly. This is why if at all possible I look for 110-240-volt motors, using the 240-v option at all times. Saves motors, better consistent drive, sharper blades (less heat produced) and quieter. You’ve saved me hours of agony, as this planner is on my Christmas list.
On the shim aspect, it won't help. The shim will raise the rollers at rest but as soon as the rollers raise up from the workpiece the spring pressure on the rollers against the workpiece will be the same wether there are shims or not. All the shims will do is raise the roller height when nothing is running through the planer. As soon as a piece of wood passes through the rollers and pushes them up the spring is the only thing applying force and the shim is no longer part of the equation.
This is true, and part of the reason I haven't done it with mine. The constant tension resulting from a shim could soften the spring over time, but I don't think it would be significant.
It's actually illegal for them to not honor the warrantee due to using non-original parts unless they can prove it was at fault. They also can not void the warrantee if you take it apart and try to fix it yourself no matter how many of those "warrantee void if removed" stickers you damage or remove. They are only there as a deterrent.
@@TheSnekkerShow That's true in the states, not sure about other countries. Your actions can not be used as a basis to deny warrantee unless it directly caused the failure.
Perfect video!. . .I learned more from watching your video than watching 10 other CZcams videos combined, on the same subject from other guys. I just bought the same DeWalt planer and Shelix cutter head (only had it 3 days now) and I work mostly with soft woods like Birch and Pine. The most interesting part of your video was the amp draw test - very interesting. Keep up the great videos!
FYI: After watching your other video about countersinks, I too realized that for years I've been using the wrong bits. . .unbelievable! When you've been a "garage guy" like myself for over 30 years, and you think you're soooo smart - you learn something new. I love it!
Thank you for being so thorough and it gave me alot to think about. I am in the process of buying a planer, Dewalt was my first choice and after watching the test i think Dewalt will be my choice because of your review. Still i`ll research further but you help me out with your testing. Again Thank you
After numerous questions and comments about amperage measurements and circuit breakers, I decided to disassemble the original circuit breaker from this planer and overload it with twice the rated amperage: czcams.com/video/24f-J0lVo-E/video.html. Thanks for keeping me on my toes and challenging anything that doesn't sound right, it makes this channel a lot more interesting for all of us.
Fun fact: This video resulted in Byrd Tool Experts (a distributor of Byrd Tool Corp products) contacting me for an interview, which you can see here: byrdtoolexperts.com/the-snekker-show-interview
If you're looking for an installation video, your search is over: czcams.com/video/8J0rvBi8a0k/video.html
Sorry for being late to the party. So to clarify, are you certain that the amperage was 27 amps? and 31 amps for the different cutters?
Okay, I just found the video where you clarify and prove the amperage draw very clearly here: czcams.com/video/24f-J0lVo-E/video.html at 21:00 minutes.
There is a tremendous load on a tool that has to remove that much material, versus a tiny 3/32" wide saw blade. I measured my Grizzly 1 1/2 horsepower, 17 amp, 120 volt table saw motor. The measured current was only 10 amps with no load on it.
This explains why I was able to use my table saw for hours at at time on really old knob and tube wiring in my old farm shop. The rating on the motor is obviously the "full load" current. My mind is blown, that a planer can draw 30 amps and be rated for 15 amps full load current.
I bought a Shelix cutter head but haven't installed it yet. Do you know what is the torque spec for those little carbide knives?
@@richardseifried7574 Covered at around 27 minutes into this video: czcams.com/video/8J0rvBi8a0k/video.html
We recently lumbered a 36" maple, a 36" white ash, and a 32" pecan. After drying, we tried planing with a Rigid (Home Depot) 13" planer with 2 HSS knives czcams.com/users/postUgkxIzvvTi3_Qc8JnVdYYRJCvuoDC4QjTzeL . This job was clearly too much for that machine. The pecan was particularly difficult, due to heavy mineral deposits, and a sharp pair of HSS knives would be consumed by a mere 3 boards. We were also having lots of problems from chip bruising, due to poor dust collection. The shavings came off like straw and jammed in the 4" hose.We bought the DW735 simply to be able to run carbide blades, which worked brilliantly for the pecan. However, we found it to be a much, MUCH nicer machine. It was far more rigid than the "Rigid" planer, and far more accurate as well. But what I liked most about it was the dust feed. This machine has its own blower, which shreds the "straw" like shavings as they come off the cutting head and helps boost the shavings into the dust collection system. No more clogs! It's also nicely sealed so that the internals stay quite clean. This is just a well tempered machine that's a delight to use. It literally cut the labor in half. Just another example of getting what you pay for.
Thank you for that important information. I'm planning on working in hardwoods. Currently I work in redwood mostly
I’ll probably never install a Shelix in my DeWalt planer, but I learned a ton that I didn’t know about my planer just by watching. Thank you!
As a retired test engineer I appreciate the thoughtfulness and thoroughness of your tests. Concerning the difference in amperage readings between the newer DW735 with the three blades vs. the elder with the Shelix heads: The difference might not all be in the type of heads betwixt the two machines.
Simply, the age disparity between the two machines might make up much of the differences in current draw per task. Bearing wear and tear, for one factor, might introduce enuf friction to cause much of the increased current required to do the same task as the newer machine. It would be most appropriate to compare the differences between the two heads (using your same methodology) on the same machine... either machine will do. That is to say: Either put the original cutter knives on the older machine and rerun the tests--OR--put the Shelix head into the newer machine and repeat.
This procedure ensures that there is only one variable in play between the A-B testing... only the cutter heads are different.
This has been brought up a few times, and I haven't tested it yet, but I doubt that three years of hobby use would cause enough wear on the motor or bearings to account for such a large difference in power draw. Having said that, I've been wrong before, and I'm sure I'll be wrong again. If I ever switch back to the OEM knives, I'll try to remember to take some before and after measurements.
If the bearings caused that much extra draw, they would get pretty hot pretty quickly.
Well thought out
@@genebruce6321 the table might not be as smooth as in a new machine. Drive belts state and tension can also have something to do with power consumption.
In addition to comments already made, DeWalt might use a better quality motor. Who knows what component parts they source based on what's available at any time?
Spiral cutters are a nice upgrade and offer a smoother cut, but are also known to require a little more power vs the three blade cutters due to the space in between the 3 blades allows for free spin on the cutter head whereas the spiral cutter blades are constantly engaged in the material thus requiring an added amount of draw on the Amps.
It's the same reason PWM (pulse width modulated) circuits draw less power. It's very fast on/off/on/off. Which is essentially what you get with the OEM knives.
Thumbs up because you invested in the video by buying two units ..got to admire anybody who puts skin in the game
Thank you for the update my planer just past a year in retrospect, beyond warranty- upon having it repaired the high-end technician recommended never getting the Shelix head due to the high heat created beside the plastic parts in the DeWalt planer- you're far far better to invest in a commercial planer using consistently @higher level
@JonDunnmusician The planer has a thermal breaker in the front, which should shut down the motor before the heat levels get high enough to melt anything, regardless of cutterhead type.
8:15 - "Some people find that to be a huge pain in the neck." As a retired machinist, I laughed at this. I've routinely rotated inserts on facemills, some had up to 20 inserts. It only takes a few seconds for each one. Facemills, endmills, drills, etc. You just do it and get on with the job.
As a Machinist by day and Furniture carpenter by night, this also made me laugh!
Im more blown away at your testing than the actual planer differences
I wonder if the higher power draw and RPMs are possibly explained by the smaller diameter of the cutter. The smaller diameter will have a lower moment of inertia unless it is significantly heavier. It will also require more torque to provide the same force on the cutting surface. It would be interesting to repeat the test with the OEM diameter cutter.
I agree... also where the amp meter didn't really change much when wood wasn't going through I suggest part of the difference may be manufacturing differences in the planers themselves or just age/wear. Sometimes manufacturers have to switch up suppliers, and there could be a 4-5amp difference between those motors. Wear and tear - sawdust and bearing age both in the motor and blade could well account for it as well. Even if it's a PITA, true test would be swapping the blades and running the test again...
Years ago when I made roll top desks and other furniture for a living I had the pleasure of using a 52” planer with a whisper cut head which is real similar to the shelix. It was real quiet and very aggressive w no tear out. Could take off 1/2” at a time on 12” poplar.
Wow, I bet the lights in the surrounding neighborhood dimmed when you turned that on.
Why I like the Shelix... Better chip extraction. The Shelix creates smaller chips than straight knives that are easier to extract. Easy and quick to change to a new cutting edge. But most importantly is the vastly improved cut quality over straight knives especially on woods with difficult grain.
And there is why he is drawing more amps from the Sheila head it is doing more cutting/revolution thus smaller chips.
i like this guy. he's doing some due diligence. respect.
I have to say this is the most well thought out video I've watched in a long time. You paid attention to volume (most don't) and your process was spot on when comparing both units. I wish everyone could learn from you how to make a good informative video. Thanks for your time.
I give your comment five stars, Mr. Critique. Don't watch my older stuff.
100% agree.
When I read I title, I thought - typical CZcams click bait.
Then I saw it was 45 mins long. Thought - this could go either way.
Extremely good video. Explained what needed to be explained, could skip through what was blah blah to me, but all the way through it was informative and stayed on point. Thank you.
Extremely surprised on the amp draw. For me, it was jaw dropping. I'm in the process of refurbishing an older 12" jointer and swapped out the 4.5HP 3 phase motor for a Baldor 5HP single phase (230V). It's rated at 20 amps but planned on running 10 gauge wire for the outlet. Eventually the outlet will also power a [220v~240v] planer. After seeing this I think I'll go with 8 gauge from panel to outlet.
The machine has a 15 amp motor which is OK to connect on a 20amp circuit . Electric code allows up to a connected load of 16 amps on a 20 amp breaker. If you are pulling 25 to 30 amps the breaker would trip before you got a 3 foot board planed even on a light cut. Something is not correct.
@@MJ-nb1qn what else is involved. Inrush current is not a problem.
Thanks for doing this video. I upgraded to a similar head (Lux), that's essentially the same as the Shelix. The end result is a much better finish, and the planer seems to have an easier time planing all boards vs the stock head. I don't doubt that the upgraded one takes more power, but while on my stock head I routinely blew a breaker, I haven't done so with this one yet. Expensive, but truly a great upgrade for the shop. Planing is now more of a pleasure vs nail biting anxiety time ;)
Yes, it’s simply not intuitive to me that a cutter that more evenly distributes the load to the motor would ever draw more current than a cutter that essentially pulses the loading. The louder sound of the straight cutters should have been indicative enough. As a final test, because the results were not intuitive (and he actually seemed to make that point), I think he should/could have switched the cutters between the two machines to remove the two base machines as a source of variance. Although the planers were the same model, it’s not to say that the 2020 model could not have had internal improvements to the drive or the motor, eg.
One more reason why the current is higher on the Shelix - is that there is overlap between the cutter head squares so as to not leave a line between them. So in effect you have more inches of knife edge hitting your board on each pass thus increasing the friction as the cutters pass across the board. Friction = Power draw! Based on everything you have said and what I understand I would still vote for the shelix every time! The sheer reduction of cutter head replacement and hassle it worth it! Thanks for the video! liked !!
The amount that overlaps will still only get cut once, despite being passed over by two different cutters. There might be a tiny amount of friction that the second cutter imparts as it grazes it, but I think that would be a negligible contribution to the current draw.
@@trevorlambert4226 so you admit it would be a LITTLE more current. I am interested in your explanation for the additional current?
@@advancednutritioninc908 the surface area of the wood being cut is a fixed dimension,shouldn't matter if there is overlap in cutters as far as load is concerned.
@@jeremymyers5643 You could be right, but I was thinking there could be more cutter area rubbing the wood if there was significant overlap. More friction, more drag, more motor current.
This guy is no stranger to logical reasoning
Oh, man do I ❤ his humour: "If I wanna run a ham sandwich through one of these, I'm gonna do that." 🤣
Great video - appreciate your diligence - Kudos.
I tested my old 12" Delta 22-540 which is a typical 15 amp planer.
Start up current was just under 14 amps, and the no load running current was 6.7 amps. I ran an old 4"x 6" Hickory beam through it for the test.
Under full load, taking a 1/16 cut off the beam, the planer was pulling just under 10 amps, as one would expect given the fact that it's a 15 amp unit.
FYI: I bought a metal detector wand. It’s about the size if a barbecue lighter. They’re about 60-80 dollars. But if you’re planning down old wood it’s a great investment.
For some reason, that's one of those tools that I've always wanted, but just never bought. I used to use a lot of reclaimed wood, and was constantly hitting wire brads and staples. Probably would have paid for itself ten times by now.
@@TheSnekkerShow : for sure. The price I quoted was Canadian dollars. So it should cost at least 35% cheaper. This is not a regular metal detector. It is short range only. This is what you use to narrow down the area when your metal detector goes off. So when you use it you have to be close. Small sweeps, you’ll get the hang of it.
I think I purchased mine back in 08 and it still works well for my needs. I don't use it often, but I've run everything from Walnut to African Mahogany to Purple Heart, and even Ipe. It's a slow process, but the machine works. If I were to offer anyone advise it would be to take your time and enjoy the process. This thing is anything but fast. I run with the OEM Blades and trash them when they're done. Before this planer I had a 22,000 lb Oliver Stratoplane, that's a different story. I enjoyed your comparison. Extremely well done! Thank you.
Wow. This was the most comprehensive and analytical review of a home hobbiest product I’ve seen. Thx very much for an excellent vid.
This is a very interesting video and comparison especially because I'm also an electronics engineer. As was previously mentioned, there are issues with the differences in age of the bearings, wear-and-tear, etc with the older planer. How much of a difference, or to what extent those differences would have a direct correlation to amperage draw is hard to say. Since one machine is from 2017 and the other from 2020 (I think that's what you said), there would obviously be differences between the two machines in terms of "burn-in", meaning that all mechanical aspects of the system are more or less "settled" (though of course, nothing in a mechanical system is ever permanently settled). Another consideration would be the possible differences in the motor efficiency between the older machine and the newer one: I doubt DeWalt would be willing to provide any quantitative numbers on either machine's motors in terms of efficiency based on their respective serial numbers (which could be traced directly back to a production run, etc). If the newer machine's motor (and other machines going forward) reflects a slight design improvement that increases its efficiency to do work, how would anyone know, except DeWalt perhaps. Also, there may be some unknown "minor improvement" in some other parts of the the system that could yield less stress on the motors and so produce less current draw. Too many unknown variables. Since your first machine has been in use, it's probably not a good test candidate to use as a DUT (Device Under Test) in a comparison because of the previously mentioned use/wear-tear issues. It would be more accurate to make a comparison between two of the same model machines, from the same manufacturing runs - if that's even possible, which I doubt - that are newly purchased together, and from the same vendor. But there could still be a question on the efficiency of the motors between two of the same machine, so purchasing two new machines is not a perfect solution, not to mention a costly one. It would be less costly to simply swap blades, i.e. put the stock blades from the newer machine into the old machine and see what the results produce, and visa-versa, put the helix blades into the newer machine and see what that produces then compare the results. Though this was not exactly a scientifically accurate comparison, I still think the comparison was revealing enough and was a very interesting video. Thank you for taking the time and effort to do this. And I hope you find use for the 2nd planer! By the way I am thinking of purchasing the very same DeWalt planner so not only was your video interesting and informative, I learned that there are after-market Helix blades (who knew!) and a bit about the internals of that planner as well ! I look forward to some of your other videos !
If your planer rate of feed is not adjustable, the increase in the amp test is partly because cutter edges pf the smaller diameter roller cutter is effectively traveling at a lower speed (FPM) and as a result is taking a larger bite per revolution, thus loading the cutting edge slightly more. Also, that style carbide cutter does not have the same type of razor edge as your standard planer blades; it is a slightly less sharp edge. If you run your finger along a planer knife edge length wise , it will cut you, those carbide inserts will not. Not a bad thing, but it answers the questions of why the motor sounds different and the amp draw is higher.
Excellent insight. I'd like to see the same test with the OEM diameter to match surface speed.
I somewhat disagree with the sharpness comment, as a machinist I fully understand edge prep on carbide but cutters such as this or high positives for aluminum work and generally dead sharp. Carbide deff can be as sharp as steel its just not the norm for metal work.
@@lockgessner Can be, yes, but as a general rule carbide inserts aren't as sharp as high speed steel tooling. It's quite uncommon for them to be sharpened from the factory. Typically they are molded and sintered and the shrinkage during the sintering process is what passes for sharpening (reduces the radius of the edge). As many (notably Stefan Gotteswinter within the CZcams / Instagram machinist community) have shown, you can sharpen your inserts to be every bit as sharp as high speed steel, but you have to actually sharpen them. Stefan built a low speed diamond lapping machine for that purpose. It is unlikely that anyone will be taking the time to sharpen all of their carbide inserts on all faces for a Shelix planer head.
I think there may be one other reason for the amp draw. Earlier in the video he said that the smaller Helix roller causes the plainer roller to push down more. That could create enough resistance to cause the amps to increase. Also look at the amps when he turns the machine on. The Helix roller rest amps are lower compared to the original roller rest amps. Why is that? Or maybe I’m just talking out of my ass because I really don’t know.
I think you’re spot on. I think the sharpness is the more important factor, though. One is an actual knife, with a 25 degree (or so) cutting edge, while the other is a carbide cutter with a 60ish degree edge. That makes the carbide cutters FAR more durable, but they will not slice as well. It’s like trying to slice a tomato with a razor sharp axe vs a razor sharp kitchen knife. They will both cut it, but the thinner edge on the knife will do it with less effort.
If horsepower is not a concern, and you have a 10hp motor, who cares about a little more effort? But when you have a 1-2hp motor, it makes a difference.
I've had the same experience as far as circuit load. However, it was simple to manage; I just take smaller cuts. It cuts so much nicer, especially on figured grain, that it's no contest. The Shelix wins hands down, every time.........
what limit were you able to pull off per pass, at least a 16th right?
I kinda wish you would have included light pass planing, like 1/3 turn of the wheel. I almost never take a full turn in one swipe when planing 5/4 stock and trying to keep the most thickness for the projects. Nice test though, especially the amp test. Wow.. had no idea I was drawing that much with it. My 20 amp breakers (new circuits) never blow.
Maybe something for a future video. I normally take light passes too, and have likewise never tripped the breaker in the panel. I've tripped breakers in the planer and in an extension cord reel, but not in the panel.
So the reason for the high current draw not tripping the breaker - they actually will trip, but it takes time. The board is through the planer before the trip time occurs. A 4x load will trip the breaker in about a second. A 15x load will trip the breaker really quickly. Breakers work through an element being heated by the current passing through them. After a certain temperature is reached - pop!
I had to go find a Square-D trip curve for a residential 20A breaker. I learned something new.
I really appreciate you making this video. It answered a lot of questions. I recently bought the dewalt as my 25 year old delta was getting tired... or maybe I was getting tired of it 😉
I solved the tear out problem years ago by buying a thickness sander. I go to the sander with my material .0625" thicker than finished dimensions and take .015" per pass.
As a small furniture maker the extra effort guarantees me a perfect product with no tear out.
I subscribed to your channel after watching this first video... well done!!!
A true test of a planer is to run Osage Orange through it. Also known as Bodark it is a super hard yellow wood, prone to chipping due to it's wavy grain nature and hard fiber. I did two cutting boards today but still had to sand them down for almost an hour . Use a different color saw dust to rub into the chip outs to show it on camera with a single light source or the sun.
Great info on the OEM & Undersized cutters. Totally SHOCKED at the amp draw. Glad I have a new 20 amp line in the shop.
Any tool will draw excessive current if you overload it, which was the case here. A full turn of the height adjustment handle is generally too much for any hardwood. I do 1/4 turn increments and 1/2 turn at the most.
You’ve got me thinking bout my future shop wiring as much as blades.
Here is an idea: With the Shelix head one (or more) of the cutters is constantly in the wood. There is no work relief between cuts. With the straight knives one (admittedly big) cutter is in the wood then you have no cutter in the wood for 1/3 of a rotation. During that rotation there is relief from some of the work load, the head can gain speed before going into the next contact.
i think you nailed it
If you think about power draw and amps pulled all equals to overload on motor and belt, so the wear and tear and all the parts will be more so most likely will get damaged faster than running the oem style
Agreed, the more you use a tool or the harder you make it work, the faster the parts will wear out. The same could be said of planing oak compared to pine, or business use compared to hobby use.
Excellent video. I am not generally interested in power consumption comparisons, because they are mostly focused on running cost. I was losing interest until I realized how the consumption compared to my breakers. THEN this became seriously interesting. Even after reading the comments here, I'm still confused about why the breaker didn't trip. The sizing differences of the spiral head was hugely non-intuitive, and I'm so glad you shed light on it. Thank you.
The video I linked in the description does a pretty good job of demonstrating, but the short version is that most breakers trip because of heat, not a number. 15 amps for 30 minutes could generate more heat in the breaker than 30 amps for 1 minute.
@@TheSnekkerShow Heat, consumption, time, breaker specs (reaction time, (slow vs. fast) etc.) See link below for some graphs and dead-simple examples.
What really helps is how unusually comfortable this guys voice is lol, i went from- "wow 40+ min vid.." to" 👀.. oh its almost over.." 😂
Great answer to which Shelix to buy - the down sized or the OEM. You explained the challenges with the undersized version perfectly. Thank You!
You're quite welcome.
I have to admit that I am a little shocked at the amp ratings between the two. But not totally surprised. I recently installed the Byrd OEM and was wondering if I had done something wrong because it seemed like it was loading the motor more than stock. Now I see it is true. It is still a worthwhile upgrade and I have no regrets.
I love it, i explain to my wife on a regular basis i could use two planers. She isn’t biting yet, but i am coming up with new and creative ideas to justify having a second one :) I am enjoying the channel and puns. Thanks for taking the time to do this comparison on a serious note. I am in SE Asia and it is challenging to get the parts to show up, not to mention the mark up. So this information is welcomed and yes the original TR was much better than the newer one, although I didn’t mind watching the second TR. Quaid start the reactor… is priceless.
I thought about getting a helix cutter for my dewalt p[laner. I asked a dewalt service center rep if it really was as good as they claim. this is what he said " if you put that cutter on your machine then you void the warranty.'. He invited me into the back and showed me about a half dozen machines with burnt out motors. This planer is not made to handle the extra load one of these cutters puts on it. He said' if you have a belt driven machine like a jointer or a large size planer that is not a problem'. I stay with the standard blades.
Your hack @14:00 of shimming the spring will raise the roller slightly, but it does not reduce the spring pressure against the roller and board. You are effectively preloading the spring, you are not reducing the pressure. The spring will exert the same pressure against the board.
You're probably right. Over time the constant pressure might soften the springs a little, but I'm not sure how much. It's not a modification I plan on doing with mine.
I don’t mind removing the cutters. I would do that regardless. Thank you for this video. I went through 6 blades within a couple weeks. I don’t usually work with pine, but I have had a few customers who were wanting used lumber for their furniture. I always remove all nails, staples, and fasteners and run a strong neodymium magnet along the board prior to planing. However, I have been running into boards with aluminum nails. It is extremely frustrating.
I wrecked 2 bandsaw blades. So I bought a metal detector on Amazon, the same as the tsa use. Saved me a lot of money because I use a lot of reclaimed wood. Able to find many dinky pieces of steel.
This is the most informative perspective on the Dewalt 735 planer I have seen yet. Thank you for being so thorough and covering info that most just overlook.
The idea about shimming the rubber rollers to rest higher (14:45), seems unlikely to succeed. This is because the problem isn't caused by where the roller sits in relation to the cutter head when the machine is -not in use-. When the machine is in use, the rollers still have to move to the same place relative to the frame to allow the cutter heads to touch the wood. Pre-compressing the roller springs with shims will do nothing to change the force those springs exert -when in use-.
There appears only 3 ways to reduce the roller head force:
1. Replace the springs with softer springs
2. Modify the machine so that the top of the springs somehow sit higher than they do currently (e.g., if there are shims on TOP of the roller springs: remove them)
3. Replace your undersized cutting roller with an OEM sized cutting roller.
IMO Shelix should not even be selling an undersized version because it creates so many problems, i can't see how anyone would ever willingly make that purchase if they knew the negative effects it would have on the rest of the machine.
If you want to reduce tearout in a very figured board, take a wet cloth and make the board cutting face damp. It'll massively reduce tearout
Good idea. I sometimes use alcohol for that, just to reduce the amount of water than might soak in to the figured grain.
I’ve been a furniture maker fir 55 years . I’ve never wet the surface and I understand the premise, but I’m not sure that will work. I will try it. It definitely will big down the cut. Thanx for the suggestion
@@sphlouge I understand the hesitation but I went to one of the top leading schools for furniture making in the US and I was working with birds eye that was tearing out. Jerry Osgood told me to try wetting it a bit and it solved my problems. Being as he was one of the most famous woodworkers I’ve ever had the pleasure of meeting, I took his advice.
Excellent discussion! Well conceived, organized, thorough, and intelligently delivered. I installed a Shelix head on my 8” jointer and had planned to upgrade my DeWalt planer next. I already decided to go with the OEM size head and you confirmed my decision. I was thinking about your discussion of the warranty matter and I think that you also need to consider the entire drive train of the cleaner that is under higher stress which results in the motor drawing higher amps. So there’s more than just the motor in the thermal overload breaker to be considered I think.Thanks!!
Good to hear, thanks for the feedback.
Nice video, thanks! Regarding amperage draw, you may wish to measure the line voltage at your outlet. It can vary anywhere between 108v and as high as 127v depending on how far your house is from the utility company's point-of-connection transformer. With a higher voltage you can expect a lower amperage draw and, of course, vice versa. You may also want to check your breakers. You can almost arc weld with older Federal Pacific or Zinsco breakers and they won't trip, but most newer inverse time breakers will usually trip very quickly at amperage draws above 30 or 40 amps for 15 or 20 amp breakers respectively.
Because your rollers are so tight on the Shelix non-oem, I think you need to test the draw on the oem Shelix. That extra draw is probably due to how much harder it needs to work to pull the board through.
That's a thought I had as well.
Fascinating detailed video- just a heads up a year after buying my Dewlat planer the motor died smoke... end
It had carbide blades from infinity cutting tools and not too much use
That's still under warranty. You should contact Dewalt.
Can't wait to see you run a ham sandwich through the planer. Its like Sweeps Week for CZcams, come up with the most outrageous content possible in order to draw in viewers. Ham Sandwich please!
The dance moves are funny, good example/ demo with blades and power outage.. thanks for the learning experience and fun !! :)
Great job
I have a 735x on the way
Already had the spiral.
So I’m excited on the savings
Turns out I made that up. I bought this planer and a jointer.
Jointer was spiral
This is straight
Oh well
VERY informative. I too upgraded to the Shellix but I did so on my 8” Grizzly joiner. The 16” Grizzly planer came with the Shellix but it also came with a 5 hp 220V motor. The Joiner came with a 3 hp 220 motor. I did find that the joiner loaded down more with the upgraded Shellix. The planer with the larger stock motor did not have any problems even with more aggressive depth settings.
A fair power consumption test would have you swap the heads and re-run. That would eliminate differences caused by other differences in the machines.
It seems likely (to the point of obvious) that the additional roller force is adding friction between the wood and the bed, which causes the roller motor to work harder to maintain a constant feed speed. To confirm this hypothesis would require some method to ensure that roller pressure is the same in both tests.
Glad I stumbled on this. Very interesting. Confirmed my thought that planers with helix cutters should be spun on minimally 240v induction motors. Been on the fence about this same Dewalt or just overhauling my very very old currently not working Powermatic 5hp planer and this demo tipped the scale. So, rolling up my sleeves and getting to work on the old planer.
Great work and information! Thank you.
I sure appreciate you posting up this video. I was very much surprised. I would have expected the planer with the bigger, stock head to use more power than the planer with the smaller diameter Shelix head. Very interesting results for sure!
Great Video tutorial. One way to determine actual pull or difference would be to measure the wood thickness before & after each cut to make sure they're cutting the exact same thickness. Just a consideration
I would put the original cutter backing if you need put it in for repairs. For one it would keep them from hesitating working on it or warranting repairs. Secondly if they replace the whole unit due to needing excessive repairs then you would likely loose your cutter head.
Sorry to be offtopic but does anyone know a tool to get back into an Instagram account..?
I stupidly forgot the login password. I would love any assistance you can offer me!
@Connor Lorenzo Instablaster ;)
@Marley Colin i really appreciate your reply. I got to the site thru google and im in the hacking process atm.
Looks like it's gonna take a while so I will get back to you later with my results.
@Marley Colin it worked and I now got access to my account again. I'm so happy!
Thank you so much you saved my account !
@Connor Lorenzo You are welcome :)
For AC power, AC current is not proportional to power draw due to power factor. This is the difference in phase between the voltage and current signals. Different loads can lead to a different power factors from the same device.
I would have liked to have seen the draw on your old machine before you switched the blades but that said a VERY good video. Personally as I would not throw out the original blades if I upgraded it, if it went wrong and I needed to return it I would just put the original blades back in first.
You and these videos are the primary reason I bought a SHELIX cutter head for my still new in box 735X! Thank you.
Thanks for the feedback. It's good to hear it was useful.
Ive had one of these planers for more than 15 years , always run it on a 15 amp circuit , run thousands of board feet of Oak , Hard maple , walnut and softwoods through it , and taken pretty heavy cuts , Ive run end grain cutting boards through it , I have never tripped the breaker on the machine or the one in the panel , I will put and amp meter on it to see what the inrush is and then monitor running current.
I don't use Dewalt blades , I found they dull too quick ,they don't last very long. Dull blades will still plane pretty good but make it work a lot harder , maybe that's the difference
well done video
I've got a brand-spanking new DW735 sitting in the back of my truck right now. I plan to put a helical head in it "just for the hell of it" but mainly to avoid any issues with end-grain and figured wood. If there's any issue that eventually needs to be taken care of by warranty, remove the helical head and install the original blades BEFORE taking it in for service. Simple. But you didn't hear that from me.
You're right, and others have added some good reasons for doing that. For one, if the planer is defective, the service center probably isn't going to carefully remove your helical head and send it back to you.
Awesome explanation... just a couple months too late for me as I've already installed and used the smaller cutter head without realizing the implications of that choice. Thanks for all the great tips though!
Very informative thank you!
Got one coming tomorrow that I picked up for $450. If I ever get shelix the blade is going to nearly match the machine price. No rush for it at current prices.
44:34 - "i gotta figure out what to do with two planers,..." hahaha. first bad thought, Run them in tandem! Out of one and into the next! I or "rough" and fine cut machines, or this machine is for the mystery board with a nail
ock in it. Worse yet, set one 90 degrees rotated from the first and you can plane small stock without turning the,...
It's actually not a bad idea. Maybe have a short conveyor between the two machines, and plenty of shop space. Lol
I have the 734. No option for smaller cutter, so I had to pull out all of the inserts. It's not the end of the world. I carefully used an impact driver and the screws came out easily. I also stuck a wixey dro on my lunchbox and it's an absolute dream to use now 👌
The movie reboot reference was great, btw 😆
I'm just a hobby woodworker, so I'm curious about the cost and if you have advice for a new planer? Thx
Very informative, thank you for taking the time to run through all these tests for us.
You're quite welcome.
Notice the louder sound from the bladed machine. its moving a lot more air this staying cooler, I think the tungsten blades need a more positive rake, it would take away some of the pressure, it would be interesting to see what the chippings look like, how both machines compare..
That would have been good to cover. At around 26:03 you can see the smaller chips from the Shelix head, which are easier on dust collection than the much wider shavings from straight knives.
Took me a year to convince my wife that I needed this planer.
Wonder how my years it's going take to convince her I need the blade
So...... hows it all going?
literally ran a set of straight knives for 2 years before I finally replaced it. First board i put through i hit a buried framing nail, all 3 blades are toast.
Ouch. Sometimes, you can cheat the system by only replacing one of them. The new knife will remove the ridge left by the other ones.
From the beginning, why didn't the 20 amp breaker in the panel trip? Actually, these machines should be on a 240 circuit with a double pole 40.
The amp meter going through a 10x multiplier and an extension cord will increase the current draw and decrease the voltage. To get a better measurement it is useful to measure the voltage at the planer plug when running the wood. It is very likely you were at 100 to 105 volts vs the 120 volts expected. That would increase current draw. You could measure the voltage only just to observe the drop under load.
You can find the voltage measurements in the video description.
lol at the thought that came to your mind while watching the total recall remake was "I, as well, am a talentless hack"
Nice vid, good detail. I bought a set of carbide blades for my DW735 for a whole lot less than the Shelix (less than half) and they work great. I have had them for just over 3 years now and they still cut like new. I have run all hardwoods including some figured with no problems. I'm a serious woodworker and use the planer often.
What brand did you get? I bought some carbide knives for my jointer a couple years ago, and they still nicked before too long. Otherwise they're still sharp, but I've been replacing one knife at a time with steel to get rid of the nicks. I mill my own lumber, so that might be part of the problem.
Why on earth did you not give the product name??
What brand of carbide did you buy ? I am thinking of buying a planner
The best review and comparison I’ve seen on here! Great job dude thank you for taking the time and showing the difference in power draw as well as planning surface quality! I’ve been through 3 of these planers this past month, the first one made a crazy rattling / death bearing motor noise after a dozen cuts as well as constantly got stuck with pine and cedar ( both had a decent bit of knots, never took cuts deeper than 1/32 at a time ) . The second one was ok at first, then I had to plane 9 cedar deck boards that were 8’ long. They had a decent bit of knots all the way down the board, and would constantly get so stuck that I had to push them through by hand with insane amounts of force. I thought cedar was soft… I guess any knots and it’s a no go. The rollers wound up getting worn out unevenly and even with pine that had minimal knots, it would constantly get stuck! I have not had a single dewalt tool let me down as much as this one. I had to force the cedar boards through because I needed to get the job done for a client ( custom shutters for their house ) Otherwise I would have stopped right away. The only culprits I could think of is; knots, and maybe a slight cup on some of the boards. I check to make sure thickness was the same all the way down on all these boards, made sure they were clean, made sure my rollers were warm, etc etc. The only thing is that I didn’t wax the bed.. I’m on the third one now which I just got yesterday and I’m honestly at the point where if I can’t figure out what I’m doing wrong I will give up and save my money to buy a bigger floor model planer. Any insight? Could it really be the knots + cupped wood? It’s cedar.. I thought that was softer wood, it did not have as many issues with pine although it did get stuck when planning wide (12”) boards. Please someone give me the rule of thumb on knots etc .. I’m bummed . These cost $800 in Canada.. not cheap especially for someone just starting to seriously get into this hobby while working for min wage. I’ve seen other videos where people plane wood with knots , and even in yours you managed to plane that small live edge piece which looked like it would be difficult, mine would just get stuck right away lol. Also it had a lot of snipe all down the board, and wouldn’t get stuck specifically where there’s knots, it was almost random and all down the board.. I hope this one works 😭😭 I even built a table for it already too..
Knots are nothing but end grain, and I've planed entire end-grain cutting boards with no major issues aside from power consumption. I'm guessing, of course, but it sounds like it could have been a couple different things:
If boards are an uneven thickness, they can get stuck partway through. If that happens, turn the crank to raise the body until the board starts moving again. This happens to me all the time, especially when planing rough lumber right after jointing. Also, since wood moves more across the width than across the length, knots tend not to shrink as the board dries, and can protrude enough to make the board jam.
Deck lumber sometimes has a higher moisture content, especially if it was stored outside. Wet wood doesn't slide across the bed as easily as dry wood. Waxing the bed is very important. The same motor that turns the cutterhead also powers the impeller and the feed rollers. Too much drag on the bed will rob power from the other functions.
Pine and cedar are soft and sappy. You are probally building up sap residue on your blades.
Anyone ever tell you that you have a very professional voice? It is easy to listen to and could deliver radio or TV ads with as much professionalism as anyone.
Thank you. I've heard that a couple of times, but mostly people just tell me I sound like Nick Offerman.
Very thorough and enlightening comparison. The amp draws with the stock planer call the soundness of the entire design into question over the long haul. One point I think your viewers should consider is that the replacement heads give the manufacturer a reason to say "no" to warranty coverage, like the first response you got from Dewalt, which really was the same as the second. I think this would be especially true with the Shelix, given the fact that Dewalt probably has tested their amp draw as well. I could be wrong, but there is certainly an argument that the heads affect the motor because of the amp draw. This was the best video I'm aware of on this topic. Very much worth the remake. Thanks.
I just came across your video. I see it is almost two years old but just the same I am in the market for a planer and it was very insightful. I wish I had seen it sooner because I have several ham sandwiches that I want to plane and didn't know you could do that. Thanks so much for the help.
Pretty obvious you are not just a woodworker. Looks like engineering education. I am about to buy one and learned about Shelix. A good plane makes all of my hobby woodworking better. I am about to make perfect fitting kitchen drawers on roller bearing slides. Great video, unpretentious host with the intelligent thought behind it all. Very cool.
Thanks for the feedback.
@@TheSnekkerShow I bought one yesterday and then was surprised how big the box was. I drove my car vs the Jeep. I'll build it in a wall rack so I can flip it up. When I picked the box up I realized how heavy it was. There are so many things I can use it for.
@@gerardlunow567 Congratulations, that's a nice addition. If you didn't get the extension tables, I'd recommend buying or building those to keep snipe to a minimum.
Got my DeWalt 735 earlier in the week (6/2021)and called Byrd today to order my shelix OEM cutter head. Requests are so numerous that they can't get me an OEM until Sept/ Oct 2021. WOW
I changed my same planer with the same brand of shelix a couple of years ago……Big game changer
Thanks for the updated video and caution about undersized vs. OEM. BTW, great that you compost, but be sure to add lots of greens/grass clippings to offset all that sawdust (super high in carbon) :-)
2 planers? use the "top half" of one attached to a "rig" that will allow the planer to move side to side and over the length of large slabs of wood to plane door and table sized pieces. I do think, based on what I could see of the the design of the DW735 in the store, that it is the right machine for that application.
Well, I'm definitely getting the OEM. Thanks.
Quality of finish is huge ,you can go to stain w a helical,enjoy sanding the washboard w the stock blades.awsome video thou gg
Very well explained!! I also have the older model and have picked up several sets of blades on sale so I'll probly go through them before I upgrade to the Shelix!! Great video!!!
add a capacitor to help the motor stay at full speed....that is why the 3 blade pulls less amps essentially....the cutter head is not in contact 100% of the time so it can speed up....a capacitor charges to peak voltage and discharges....it will keep the voltage up and steady
That's just crazy enough to work.
They should just ship the OEM-size 735 Shelix with the cutters detached. Less manufacturing cost, less install time for the user. I must be overlooking something.
I asked about that, and the cutters need to be installed for balancing. It would definitely save some installation time if they were already off.
Thank You for posting this, I had no idea that to actually get the best job from this planer I should get the Shelix cutter head. Taking the cost of thos planer & get the best from it will cost an additional 500 dollars
It's definitely a nice improvement, but I've owned thickness planers for more than 20 years before getting this. Don't rush the upgrade unless you're sure it's the right move for you.
Great comparison video. I recently bought one of these planers as I gear up my garage but haven't had a chance to use it yet. Pretty certain my garage is on 15amps at the moment and I've already blown the breaker combining a portable ceramic heater and a shopvac. It'll be interesting to see how long till I need to call an electrician over to upgrade my garage breakers.. I have a feeling its definitely not going to cut it as is.
Yeah, that will be close, especially if you want to capture the dust instead of breathing it. There are some clever designs for filter cabinets to eliminate the need for simultaneous dust collection, but an electrical upgrade is probably inevitable.
You will be doing more than upgrading your breakers. You will have to run heavier wire to the receptacle also.
29.45 if you're planing a lot of hard wood... you'd get a different planer. The DeWalt is very good on construction site for soft framing wood and similar. It can do hardwoods but doing a lot is job for a much heavier duty machine
Great job on this video. I have been running my 735 with stock straight knifes on a 15 amp circuit and have not had any problems with the circuit breakers, but I see I could not expect the same if I upgraded to a Shelix. I wonder how the 1/16 difference in diameter affects the load. Might be even worse with a stock diameter (wood cutting reaction force would have more leverage)
If you have to remove the cutters in the OEM head, they should just ship them loose and save you a lot of work. When I bought mine years ago they did not have the OEM head. I was able to install the smaller diameter cutter head without removing any of the cutters. I wrapped the cutter with the clear cellophane that came in the package and slid it in no problem.
Two concerns: First, when you add the device to separate the hot and neutral, instead of measuring the current on ONE wire, you are measuring the current on TEN turns (as the video said), and the reading is TEN times higher than the actual current. Divide the displayed reading by ten to get the actual current use. If the actual current had been 25-30 amps, the home circuit breaker as well as the planer breaker would have popped. I suspect the breaker on the planer that popped may have been defective. Second, the circuit breakers do not sense the motor's heat - they sense only the current drawn (they also do not sense voltage, only current).
Your first concern might be answered by some of the information in the video description text. You are correct that the breaker doesn't detect the motor's heat, the breaker detects its own heat. I'm making a separate video about that topic, which I might publish tomorrow if time permits.
First, great videos! The length of the extension cord makes a difference regardless that it is sized properly. This is why if at all possible I look for 110-240-volt motors, using the 240-v option at all times. Saves motors, better consistent drive, sharper blades (less heat produced) and quieter. You’ve saved me hours of agony, as this planner is on my Christmas list.
This video shows the inside of the circuit breaker as it trips, and explains why. czcams.com/video/24f-J0lVo-E/video.html
@@clarmarkable I have some information about the cord length and voltage in the video description.
Also those inserts are made out of carbide and they are used metal cutting machines such as a lathe so cutting wood will make them last a lot longer.
Could we see you put a 12" subway sub through both of them and see what type of splatter spread you get on the back wall?
White or wheat?
Rye...with plenty of spicy mustard and extra Mayo!
On the shim aspect, it won't help. The shim will raise the rollers at rest but as soon as the rollers raise up from the workpiece the spring pressure on the rollers against the workpiece will be the same wether there are shims or not. All the shims will do is raise the roller height when nothing is running through the planer. As soon as a piece of wood passes through the rollers and pushes them up the spring is the only thing applying force and the shim is no longer part of the equation.
This is true, and part of the reason I haven't done it with mine. The constant tension resulting from a shim could soften the spring over time, but I don't think it would be significant.
It's actually illegal for them to not honor the warrantee due to using non-original parts unless they can prove it was at fault. They also can not void the warrantee if you take it apart and try to fix it yourself no matter how many of those "warrantee void if removed" stickers you damage or remove. They are only there as a deterrent.
Good information, thanks. I wonder if that varies by location or state.
@@TheSnekkerShow That's true in the states, not sure about other countries. Your actions can not be used as a basis to deny warrantee unless it directly caused the failure.
That's the Magnuson-Moss Act, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnuson%E2%80%93Moss_Warranty_Act
Perfect video!. . .I learned more from watching your video than watching 10 other CZcams videos combined, on the same subject from other guys. I just bought the same DeWalt planer and Shelix cutter head (only had it 3 days now) and I work mostly with soft woods like Birch and Pine. The most interesting part of your video was the amp draw test - very interesting. Keep up the great videos!
Thanks for the feedback.
FYI: After watching your other video about countersinks, I too realized that for years I've been using the wrong bits. . .unbelievable! When you've been a "garage guy" like myself for over 30 years, and you think you're soooo smart - you learn something new. I love it!
@@mikesanchez9654 I'm reminded constantly how little I know. Keeps things exciting.
Thank you for being so thorough and it gave me alot to think about. I am in the process of buying a planer, Dewalt was my first choice and after watching the test i think Dewalt will be my choice because of your review. Still i`ll research further but you help me out with your testing. Again Thank you
Glad it was helpful.
I added the same shelix head to my Dewalt DW735 a couple of years ago. Makes a very big difference.
Very interesting and informative! Thanks for the video!