Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.
Who Wants to be a Milleniumaire? With Special Guest
Vložit
- čas přidán 14. 03. 2023
- You can find @DistantCoder at these links
Twitch- / distantcoder
Clips from stream over at / theduellogs
Akiza emotes art by / missandydandy
#yugioh #ygo #masterduel
Konami only printed Linear Equation Cannon for Logs I swear to god
I think it's funny how many of the contestants refuse to answer it. This is a very easy question, literally the most basic of algebra equations.
@@Celestia282 yea, its a lot of text but its just target = GY - enemy controlled, so just find a monster whos level x1-6 matches and you are good to go. I think they get tripped up trying to walk the whole thing forwards all at once, so the flat modifier on the end makes them feel lost
coder needs to bring duellogs over for a ruling quiz
actual factual on god no cap
Gaslighting Logs remains undefeated
I can’t believe that not only my Twitter recommendation about what year soul charge was banned made it into the show, but that it also absolutely devastated Coded the way it did.
Soul Charge being banned in 2019 is like the single most anomalous thing to ever happen in Yugioh I swear.
coder doesn't watch mbt's twitter thread videos
MBT doesn’t either because it’s been brought up like 3 times and he ALWAYS FORGETS!
I came back to yugioh after à long hiatus in 2018, and i didn t understand why this card was good bc u need to pay life points... past me was so pure and innocent
Truly was the most Mandela effect banning in all of yugioh
"My buddy Josh has a binder full of these". Well, thanks Josh for buying out so many that it raised the price to 30$ lmao
THIS is the contestant I've been waiting for.
Team APS next?
Or Gage since he was the friend who Coder called
I am waiting on cimooo
Linear equations cannon is like mandatory math question for this series 🤣
My man really brought out the price of Bean Soldier. Talk about specific
“Distant Coder will never work with me” - Duel Logs in some video being wrong. Loved this one and I’m glad you made the final questions more intense, but still were willing to not be too harsh like giving the rarities!
Shame we didn't get a last turn ruling question. Would have loved to see Coder get an aneurism live on stream
Coder's 5 questions in at 3 minutes, in a 33 minute long video. This is gonna be good
Gaslighting like a true gameshow host. It's a good thing he's only doing it to stress them out or they could wind up doing a LOT worse.
Who would EVER accuse TheGaslightLogs of gaslighting someone??
Fair to say people don't know about Jet's search effect because they don't play any Junk monsters and you can only use 1 effect per turn, so if you use it's revive from GY effect, you can't use the search at all
The judge being judged by the spider 🕷️ logs
Didn't Coder use Bean Soldier a lot in his rulings quiz? Influencer prices do be hitting hard. I wouldn't be surprised if he contributed to the inflated price, at least in part.
Literally my wet dream, I've been requesting this on both channels!!
Darn these Linear Equation Cannon questions. I'm starting to be able to solve them without having to recheck the card text...
To be fair, "Bean Soldier" is a meme, and memes sell.
It’s good to see TheGaslightLogs back for another great episode
I like how everyone just collectively forget that soul charge isn’t banned till 2019.
How can you forget that Soul Charge was in Gouki format, even in Danger Thunder Format
That last question is rough. Welcome Labrynth is like, $1 more than Lady Labrynth.
On TCG Player Lady is more expensive now by a $1. But that change happened in the last week or two.
it's like 8-10€ difference in favour of welcome on cardmarket lol
Welcome is 20 UK pounds bigger than lady. Arianna is the one that is closest at almost the same
@@JoeH.. Right now on TCG Player Welcome is averaging $27.59 and Lady is at $28.86. Wonder what's causing such a discrepancy between NA and EU.
It’s impossible to miss the linear equation question
Was there no intro? It just went straight into the questions
No intro because Coder was kinda rushing for his next collab.
Funny that this got uploaded when the new Unchained support gets revealed
The final question was pretty easy for me because I just built a Labrynth deck for a friend recently, and Welcome Labrynth was $50 a copy so I got shafted on the playset of that lmao
the Bean soldier question, I definy put on the 30$ because it's a premiun card that has few prints, specially being a tournament print card, the collection value of these are high.
Some old vanilla card that rarely see nowdays have some high value, specially the OCG exclusives that got a TCG print on tournament.
Droll Bird is another one of these that has horrible stats and it's a vanilla but has a price tag that is match the Droplets in some cases.
Or Beautiful Headhuntress, which I'm pretty sure is at least $100 or something nuts like that.
The gaslight logs
When the Coding is in the distance.
What's hilarious is that for the Linear Equation Cannon question, I actually *did* remember it off the top of my head, I literally paused the video, thought "Linear equation cannon had some multiplication, I think it was declared number times target monster level- and I know there was addition, so they probably mentioned the 3 spell/traps to make it 5 opponent cards, so that's what gets added- meaning it has to be 3 because 3x5 is 15 and 15+5 is 20 which is exactly the amount needed
And then I looked it up, realized I totally remembered it right AND got it right, and then went back to play the video only to realize they showed the effect anyway, which made me feel incredibly smart
I'm very glad I made a dumb gimmick deck based on Linear Equation Cannon XD
The gaslight logs attacks again!
Fantastic video! Would love to see more content like this!
No one remembers when soul charge was banned because it got banned on the same list that banned firewall dragon.
Everyone freaked the fuck out about firewall and didn't even car about the rest of the list.
My guy just speedrunning the game for the flex
you really shouldn't have put Linear Equation Cannon on screen for this one, it's coder he can figure it out
That was a pretty cool game. More collabs in the future for sure.
Idk when this was filmed but lady labrynth is now more expensive than welcome labrynth, but only a little bit more.
Bean soldier - TP1 (no mint dispo) near mint price between 2,5 and 8€
First German dispo 2,5€
First French dispo 3€
First Italian dispo 3,3€
First English dispo 3,48€
First Spanish dispo 5€
I think this show is awesome but I think it's needs a bit more difficulty built into it.
Some of the Qs there are no tricks even on the hard ones.
Also there's a bit too much security with the number of lives and regaining lifelines. So by natural result there's very little chance anyone ever doesn't get to the top. If not everyone wins the whole thing, it becomes more interesting.
The Misleading Logs
The waifu tax lmao
Lady and Welcome are 28 dollars right now.
Max minimum price
Lady labrynth (DABL) -169€
Welcome (blmr) -75€
Arianna (tama) - 65€
Great welcome (phhy) - 18€
First one that felt tense
This is so cool!
Arianna was 2nd most expensive, at about 35 ish
If my opponent activates Nibiru while they control some monsters and I chain Spellbound, does Nibiru still clear my field?
I'm not a judge but my interpretation is that resolves succesfully indeed does clear your field but not your oponent's. Like when you have a towers it doesn't get tributed but everything else does. Happened while playing @Ignister
@@yatakarasu98 That makes sense. Bummer.
Fun fact: the original Towers is actually not immune to Nibiru. Apoqliphort Towers is unaffected by spells, traps, and all effects of monsters with a Level/Rank lower than its own Level, ten.
Nibiru, however, is Level 11.
32:59 Just curious who did all of the questions without using a lifeline?
holy shitake mushroom, the life line regen is back in here, so it is true that asagi ame is in the hard mode of this show, legit ame is awesome to win the hard mode
I know Soul Charge wasnt banned at 2017, cause i started playing at 2018 and remembered using it on my noob deck
Question 6 was my twitter recommandation! A bit sad that coder got it so easily (and even pointed out that it would have been more correct to say "using imperm on a monster whose effects are already negated" instead of trying to talk about skill drain), but it was still really cool seeing it there!
For those wondering, the logic behind the question was that all those cards will fizzle on resolution (i.e. not do anything for the first 3, and not do what it's supposed to do for the last one), and usually it is forbidden by game rules to use a card that would predictably fizzle on resolution. The other three are cases "complex enough" (according to game rules) to say that it's not predictable that they will fizzle, so you can activate them. The weirdest case to me is definitely shrink, because even if it technically does nothing, it is in fact not even considered as "fizzling", as can be seen with the fact that black garden effect after the "then" will still properly resolve (when usually if the part before the "then" fizzles, the part after it does not resolve, as is the case with hand destruction with macro cosmos on the field for instance). That's even weirder considering the fact that effects that substract a numerical value (like black winged dragon's effect) *do* fizzle when used on a monster with 0 atk
Half of 0 is still 0(or a computational error), but its still halved, the act of halving has no requirement for quantity, though subtraction effects also don't require the full quantity to properly resolve either, just a value greater than zero
The weirder things about Shrink are the way its worded gives it some weird corner case behavior with other stat modifiers, since its "Original ATK is halved"
@@syrelian I know half of 0 is still 0, but that kind of thing is still considered as fizzling usually in yu-gi-oh. For instance, if there are no monsters on the field, destroying no monsters is still technically destroying all of them ("destroying all of something" does not really has a requirement for quantity either), but yu-gi-oh rulings will still consider that as if the effect did not work (for instance, if there is one monster on the field, you activate kaiju slumber, and your opponent chains to it a card that destroys the sole monster on the field, kaiju slumber will then fizzle and not allow you to summon the kaijus from the deck)
Regarding what you said about the nuance of "original atk" I don't think it is *that* weird because, while it might be hard to predict without knowing rulings, it at least does actually make sense and becomes predictable once you know the rulings (and is akin to mtg layers)
@@pkinsect6618 "Destroy All" doesn't specify a quantity, but you still fail to Destroy if you have no targs, its not that you Destroyed 0 and 0 is a Number, its that the operation of Destruction never occurs successfully at all, the value of destructions is Null because it never occurred, but "Divide" works on 0, you can successfully perform the operation of Divide, because even though the result is meaningless, it does have a result
@@syrelian I get what you mean because that makes sense in natural language, but imo a card game should be as formal as possible (almost "mathematical" in a way) because that way it is easier to predict how the game will work once you know the basic rules. Doing a "manual" different case for 0 is deeply anti-mathematical, so to me destroying no monsters should absolutely be "destroying 0"
Even computationally (since that's what you seem to try to compare it to), the easiest function you would think of to destroy all monsters on the field would be "for all monsters on the field : destroy it" which would absolutely return that it did its task succesfully if there are no monsters on the field. I don't really think it's possible to write an intuitive function that would "return null" as you say on an empty field without adding a specific clause for the case 0 (by that I also include "indirect" clauses, like adding a boolean that becomes true only if you actually enter the for). If you want the function to "return what it did", you would need a list for the case where there are several monsters, and this list will just be empty if you destroyed none, it's just like 0, it's meaningless but it's still a result
In that sense, to me the only formal way to say that a card "did nothing" is to see that the field is the same before and after its resolution, and that way I don't really see how shrink on a monster with 0 atk would not fit into this category
would be nice to see the cards on screen
I think this one was a bit more rushed since he did it for coders subathon
lmao Lady is higher than welcome labrynth today, just barely though.
I haven’t bought yugioh packs for years but recently bought just 4 packs of “Duels From the Deep”, somehow pulled the most expensive card from that set. I think Konami was trying to tell me something
I was using soul charge with the dangers l had that question 😂
Watching this 9 days later and the final question did not age well.
hey is there going to be more of these?
why is coder constantly banned from ygo?
He’s only been banned once. And it’s for a year (which is a standard amount of time to be banned).
@@jk844100 ok cool, i guess. but what did he do to deserve this?
@@dantemcedgelord9331 Konami didn’t say (they never do).
But I suspect it’s because he called out DKayed for promoting cheating.
DKayed made a video that promoted “legal cheating” by encouraging people to mislead their opponent on which effect of “fateful adventure” they’re activating.
Coder made a video explaining why it’s against the rules to do what DKayed said but in the thumbnail coder put “cheater?!” Or something like that. So Konami banned him.
You’re not allowed to call people out. You’re just supposed to report them to Konami.
Realistically DKayed should have been banned too for promoting cheating but he’s literally the only reason people still play DuelLinks so Konami is probably giving him a pass (plus he hasn’t play in-person Yugioh in like 10 years so a ban would be pretty pointless).
@@jk844100 really, cause if i remember correctly, coder mentioning being banned even before the dked drama. i mean i hat dqeyd cause he promotes bullshit to his audience, like when cross duel came out, he made some videos hyping is as the second coming of yugi, recomending his viewers to spend money and shit on that game. dekayed can f himself
@@jk844100 when people don't play IRL they aren't scared of getting banned.
Does coder not remember gouki and spiral playing soul charge
Effect vieler kkkkkkk
Ganz viele Effekte negiert.
Holy shit its an actual human on screen wtf
Is 13 a trick question because no matter what number is picked the card always resolves unless negated?
Feels like these vids should be really hype but they're always scuffed to sht
Lol I don’t want to be misleading 💀 you practically made him loose those lives
@Cimoooo when?