Inside The World's Cleanest Power Plant - In China | Coming Clean About Green | CNA Insider

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 20. 09. 2018
  • China is notorious for its air pollution, but it also boasts the world’s cleanest, most efficient power plant in Shanghai. And it does so by burning the dirtiest of all fossil fuels - coal. Can one really turn coal ‘clean’?
    More about the truth behind China’s green technologies like solar power and electric vehicles on the series Coming Clean About Green: cna.asia/ccag
    For more, SUBSCRIBE to CNA INSIDER!
    / cnainsider
    Follow CNA INSIDER on:
    Instagram: / cnainsider
    Facebook: / cnainsider
    Website: cna.asia/cnainsider
    About the series:
    Our planet is in trouble. Ice caps are melting, islands are drowning, and our weather is out of whack.
    But there also appears to be many ways to save it. From cycling to recycling, ditching plastic to embracing electric. In our fight against climate change, we have produced more innovative solutions than ever.
    But how much can they help?
    Follow host Alex Yue as he travels across Asia to uncover the reality of green solutions - from sustainable fishing in Thailand, to clean coal in China.
  • Věda a technologie

Komentáře • 839

  • @arunsar7893
    @arunsar7893 Před 3 lety +35

    3:01 I hope people know that is not a Chimney, it's a cooling tower and the "smoke" coming out of it, is steam(pure water), not smoke from burning coal.

    • @tdron123
      @tdron123 Před 2 lety

      @@FascismoRedentor962 but it's also water cooling towers even if it's nuclear or whatever it is station

    • @kesatria_gelap
      @kesatria_gelap Před rokem +1

      Absolutely

    • @KoalaFicationOfficial
      @KoalaFicationOfficial Před rokem +2

      Whole video is propaganda lol they shut down the whole units for there video

  • @gerardjacquesvanwyk395
    @gerardjacquesvanwyk395 Před 3 lety +9

    Misleading title about a coal plant. Nuclear energy is the cleanest power generation method

  • @Sacto1654
    @Sacto1654 Před 5 lety +19

    There are three major pollutants you need to remove from burning coal: particulates, heavy metals and oxides of sulfur. Removing them can be quite expensive, hence the reason why in the USA, many power plants use low-sulfur content coal from Wyoming's Powder River basin.

  • @mikykanazawa7308
    @mikykanazawa7308 Před 5 lety +39

    No explanation of how tech worked at all..

    • @greenworld1259
      @greenworld1259 Před 5 lety +17

      Yeh this video explains it really terribly.
      Most new plants built today are ultra-supercritical. And such plants emit less emissions and are more efficient. And it's easier to add filters to the newer coal plants.
      So basically it's just a holistic improvement over past generation coal plants. Making it the cleanest coal plant today. But not actually fully clean at all lol

    • @xiaomose7495
      @xiaomose7495 Před 3 lety +1

      @@greenworld1259 did u understand what cleanest mean?

    • @vishalgiraddi5357
      @vishalgiraddi5357 Před 3 lety

      Basically a normal power plant that uses higher pressure boiler, and steam turbines

    • @88eclhome71
      @88eclhome71 Před 3 lety

      National security😂😂

    • @anupapasanjith
      @anupapasanjith Před 3 lety

      There are many carbon capture technologies, such as RPBs. So what in this video is possible

  • @pdd3
    @pdd3 Před 5 lety +16

    "Clean coal" involves scrubbing SO2. NO2, and dust out of the exhaust. But it doesn't mean CO2 emissions are reduced from my understanding. That requires carbon capture and sequestration. That is expensive.

    • @drjohnson920
      @drjohnson920 Před 2 lety +4

      Think about how in nature forest fires would burn every year or two and trillions of tons of ash and smoke would go into atmosphere! If anything the earth may need this natural process

    • @Arturo-lapaz
      @Arturo-lapaz Před 11 měsíci

      That is exactly right, they claim that they eliminate the residual CO2 emmisions, which cannot be true, because after removing the real pollutants, that is all that remains after coal combustion. And CO2 in the air is vital for the vegetation for the photosynthesis of C6H12O6, grape sugar.
      I assumge that even on a dōng fēng storm the chinese use wine.

  • @anazu.047
    @anazu.047 Před 5 lety +212

    He deserves all the awards.

    • @bigm0j02
      @bigm0j02 Před 5 lety +14

      For putting filters on a plant? That plant emits CO2 which is fucking transparent... capturing fine dust with water curtain... no visible smoke... but you contaminate a shitload of water.... what a feat of engineering...

    • @anazu.047
      @anazu.047 Před 5 lety +22

      Béla Németh I applaude only for his acheivement. Thats all. Its not like every one of us never pollute earth before..

    • @stanw8888
      @stanw8888 Před 5 lety +3

      He bought all the awards. The people who came up with the "awards" bought him and his soul.

    • @supportervandeeuropeseunie1625
      @supportervandeeuropeseunie1625 Před 5 lety +1

      vanilla panda Does he really deserve all the awards for creating a NIMBY-proof coal power plant? After what we've learned from Germany with their clean diesel cars? Clean coal is a myth just as clean diesel.

    • @chv459
      @chv459 Před 5 lety +5

      @@bigm0j02 dust in water can be filtered.

  • @icekk007
    @icekk007 Před 5 lety +11

    2:09, the caption should read every one cubic meter, not every meter. Professor describes the concentration of particles in a volume, not a length.

  • @d20297
    @d20297 Před 3 lety +3

    This technology was developed 40 years ago in the United States

    • @randomacc7721
      @randomacc7721 Před 3 lety

      @peter pan the mining still releases CO2, and nuclear releases 0 greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere. Why use outdated coal burning with new tech to make it “cleaner” (but still dirty), when you can use nuclear, which is much more efficient too? Hopefully china continues building nuclear power plants

  • @TomBray-LowCarbonLifestyle

    I think this is really very misleading. Prof Feng talks about capturing the nitrogen dioxide, sulphur and dust... but there is no evidence of CO2 capture in his explanation. The claim that this is a clean power station is even more disputed when you talk about publicity at the end.
    Let's keep fossil fuels like coal where they belong, in the ground, or in a museum!

    • @waiteswaite
      @waiteswaite Před 2 lety

      Trees 🌳 Breathed CO 2 so it's fine.

    • @TomBray-LowCarbonLifestyle
      @TomBray-LowCarbonLifestyle Před 2 lety +1

      @@waiteswaite that's truth to some extent, but we are emitting much more than trees can sequester. We need to rapidly reduce emissions as well as plant more trees worldwide

  • @loudnessjr
    @loudnessjr Před 3 lety +6

    So it works. Tell me how clean the process of making batteries to store renewable energy

  • @mauriciomarquez9314
    @mauriciomarquez9314 Před rokem +2

    The problem with Green energy, is that it is increasing the unemployment and poberty rates in a worldwide scale. You can run a photovoltaic plant of thousands of hectares with a handfull of people. I have experienced it personally, hundreds of colleagues (engineers, technicians, cleaning staff, administrative, logistics, etc.) losing their jobs due to the closure of thermal plants... it is a true and sad reality, and the city, which is small, is slowly dying economically.
    I would love to find a middle ground between having clean energy and generating a sufficient number of jobs, but at the moment, clean energy does not provide even 5% of the jobs in a thermal power plant.

  • @Peizxcv
    @Peizxcv Před 5 lety +52

    The cleanest energy is nuclear because the environmental impact is the smallest of all energy sources.

    • @rainmind
      @rainmind Před 5 lety +8

      Like in fukushima?

    • @gfxminer4809
      @gfxminer4809 Před 5 lety +5

      when it go wrong it also clean up the whole ecosystem from ever be safe for human civilization to thrive there

    • @yoyohb4938
      @yoyohb4938 Před 5 lety +2

      which has no way to be dealed with.

    • @PresidentialWinner
      @PresidentialWinner Před 5 lety

      Nuclear is Radical. It's like, the best.

    • @supportervandeeuropeseunie1625
      @supportervandeeuropeseunie1625 Před 5 lety +1

      Mining always is a dirty job. This is also the case for uranium mining.

  • @dr.sayyedamrullah3067
    @dr.sayyedamrullah3067 Před 5 lety +21

    Superb presentation🤗🤗🤗

  • @milkncookiezzzz
    @milkncookiezzzz Před 5 lety +81

    Hi China 🇨🇳

  • @CrazyProgrammer16
    @CrazyProgrammer16 Před 5 lety +18

    great job

  • @nomoredamnnamestouse
    @nomoredamnnamestouse Před 5 lety +77

    Currently the best #1 US coal plant is not even same league in energy efficiency versus the the top 100 coal plants in China. MAGA amirite?

    • @bigm0j02
      @bigm0j02 Před 5 lety +11

      First, link your source... second, maybe noone builds coal power plant in the western world in the recent decades...

    • @jia2001
      @jia2001 Před 5 lety +4

      USA should learn from Norway.
      We will have all or cars electric by the next 10 year.
      I see more and more buses in Norway that are electric.
      I agree with him that Europe, USA and Japan have better tech than China, but USA don't apply those tech to good use.

    • @MrCordycep
      @MrCordycep Před 5 lety +2

      Those coal plants are old. They are building quick start and combined cycle natural gas power stations.

    • @AFlyingCookieLOL
      @AFlyingCookieLOL Před 5 lety +4

      " Béla Németh
      Béla Németh
      3 days ago
      First, link your source... second, maybe noone builds coal power plant in the western world in the recent decades... "
      China has a high energy demand and with it's demand even with multiple nuclear power plants can barely achieve enough power for it's people. Nuclear power plants take a long time to certify. Even with it's increased number of coal plants, SO2 emissions have been reduced by 75% in China.

    • @kckdude913
      @kckdude913 Před 5 lety +1

      @Béla Németh But didn't Trump say that he was going to bring back more coal jobs in America?

  • @ahnafkhan5861
    @ahnafkhan5861 Před 5 lety +103

    Long live China -- best country -- love from Pakistan.

    • @ahnafkhan5861
      @ahnafkhan5861 Před 5 lety +4

      @Asian Guy - yeah I've heard the same from different sources :'') 💚

    • @UnChannelDuVulpineX
      @UnChannelDuVulpineX Před 5 lety +6

      India's better than Pakistan.

    • @UnChannelDuVulpineX
      @UnChannelDuVulpineX Před 5 lety +1

      Chopstick I'm not an Indian.
      Indian ladies are renowned for their beauty. Pakistani women are well known for their moustaches.
      I spoke to a government official in India recently. She said that Pakistan is full of pussies, that don't have the courage to use their nuclear weapons.

    • @tanmaykumar4561
      @tanmaykumar4561 Před 5 lety +4

      @@AK-ic4qw You high on that madarsa education?

    • @robfinn3407
      @robfinn3407 Před 5 lety +2

      So happy the US killed Bin Laden. Pakistan was harboring him. Cut all aid to Pakistan. Support India.

  • @RayMak
    @RayMak Před 5 lety +35

    Any other natural energy we can use?

    • @susaneyre4837
      @susaneyre4837 Před 3 lety +4

      For 10 years Vancouvers' False Creek Thermal Energy Utility has been financially 'self-supporting', heating it's buildings and supplying its hot water requirements by capturing its' thermal sewage heat, eliminating 60% of regular building carbon emissions, and it provides 70% of the areas heating requirements annually, except for in the coldest of weather. This thermal technology also provides the all - important cooling for the intense summer heat. All of you living in cities could use this technology -it's local, sustainable and a 24/7 energy source, with plenty of room for further development. Solar is just one big business technology of going Green. Consider if all the cities in the world used their sewage problem, turning it in to an energy solution instead. Providing local long-term employment, low impact on the environment, and demands on infrastructure. Vancouver/Canada now has 4 thermal heating districts, making a profit and expanding a 5th . Green Initiative Vancouver -check it out!

    • @mattwong5403
      @mattwong5403 Před 3 lety +8

      Hydrogen fuel cells, solar energy, biofuel, geothermal, and hydroelectric

    • @namrehtv2746
      @namrehtv2746 Před 3 lety

      infinite generator gg

    • @lannkasihlanggar4016
      @lannkasihlanggar4016 Před 3 lety

      Human heart

    • @CarlosAM1
      @CarlosAM1 Před 3 lety +4

      @Your mum nuclear is by far better than fossil. Fusion doesnt even produce energy yet lmao

  • @dieselphiend
    @dieselphiend Před 2 lety +2

    We have these scrubber systems in the US as well. My trade installs them.

  • @jackinat0r114
    @jackinat0r114 Před 5 lety

    Great video, subbed :-)

  • @abhinavsharma8020
    @abhinavsharma8020 Před 5 lety +34

    China is a power in asia China is not a comparison in any other Asian country

  • @daviddavis5689
    @daviddavis5689 Před 5 lety +3

    Basiclly the agreement they signed allow them to continue to increase emissions until 2030.

  • @heishnamrajatasingh1456
    @heishnamrajatasingh1456 Před 5 lety +1

    Love it,nice work👍

  • @ziegle9876
    @ziegle9876 Před 5 lety +5

    And what about the Mercury?

  • @jeetenderkakkar7570
    @jeetenderkakkar7570 Před 4 lety

    hello sir
    how to generate electricity

  • @pakistandotcom7209
    @pakistandotcom7209 Před 5 lety +53

    Love ❤️ & respect from Pakistan 🇵🇰🇨🇳

    • @petarcosic2781
      @petarcosic2781 Před 4 lety

      10-Year-Old Boy Gang-Raped by Islamic Teachers Until He Cried Blood
      Sickening incident took place in Northern Pakistan Madrassa
      The sexual harassment case with minors are rapidly increasing in Pakistan, only in 2019, from January to June, 1,304 cases of sexual abuse of children have been reported in the media.
      Which the numbers of minor girls and boys are 729 and 575, respectively, who became casualties of sexual misuse. The cases under significant classes included 378 of snatching, 139 of assault, 153 of homosexuality, 46 assault, 88 of group homosexuality through 12 minor boys and four girls have been killed after sexual maltreatment. - According to Sahil, a child protection society.

  • @REALSTEELBRO
    @REALSTEELBRO Před 5 lety +27

    great information!

  • @ge3123
    @ge3123 Před 5 lety +1

    Didn't explain clean coal technology, just says uses clean coal and uses Environmental friendly filter. Well every power plant uses filters like Electrostatic precipitator. Wish you explained more how they cut down pollution to 20mg. And cooling tower does not produce pollution, its just vapor.

  • @aggnal2892
    @aggnal2892 Před 3 lety +2

    It probably consumes a good amount of energy to clean its own emissions. 20 mg? A fraction of then current limits?

  • @haroldlamble5163
    @haroldlamble5163 Před 3 lety +1

    Moonscape mineing looks like mines in southern Indiana . Tear up everything leave pits and overburdened behind good for nothing but scrub trees.

  • @vibhavagarwalla8718
    @vibhavagarwalla8718 Před 3 lety

    Is the gentleman’s first name Prof or is that being used as a short for Professor? If the latter, why did the anchor keep using it incorrectly? Wonder if the voice was auto generated or was that the real voice of the video anchor hired for the infomercial.

  • @jamesmoore2007
    @jamesmoore2007 Před 4 lety +4

    The us has been using scrubber technology for years! Lol

  • @ronalddash6520
    @ronalddash6520 Před 3 lety +7

    This needs to be done everywhere!

  • @naufalqnw
    @naufalqnw Před 5 lety +3

    I thought Isogo Plant in Yokohama Prefecture, Japan has the cleanest coal plant emission.. With single digit NOx, SOx, PM and CO.

    • @skippy5712
      @skippy5712 Před 3 lety

      Yes. They are very much the same.

  • @ericalexander2720
    @ericalexander2720 Před 5 lety +156

    Very well made video. Just stay away from the American sitcom phrases. They cheapen the information, and insult your intelligence.

    • @ericalexander2720
      @ericalexander2720 Před 5 lety +11

      bj2690 Yes, I totally agree. The West does not know how to deal with anything positive that does not originate from them.
      When I said "well made video", I was referring to the way the young man was giving us the information. I'm tired of seeing videos where the host is talking to us like we are 6 year old kids.

    • @lijie6431
      @lijie6431 Před 5 lety +4

      Eric, You get brainwashed so easily

    • @joewulf7378
      @joewulf7378 Před 5 lety +1

      NOT RANDOM
      ON PURPOSE

    • @guochuqiao
      @guochuqiao Před 5 lety +5

      He showed where SO2 and NO was captured, but missed the probably the most important CO2. Why? it's probably not captured.

    • @adinyanyan
      @adinyanyan Před 5 lety

      👍👌✊✌✋☝👆💟💟💟👍

  • @rainliu8990
    @rainliu8990 Před 5 lety +18

    I could see more days with blue sky and white clouds in recent two years to be honest in Shanghai and Even Beijing ! You guys agree ?

    • @karlosbricks2413
      @karlosbricks2413 Před 5 lety +1

      yes, it's not as bad as 2015 or so

    • @zen-mc4ju
      @zen-mc4ju Před 5 lety +2

      It's getting better and better.

    • @dknowles60
      @dknowles60 Před 5 lety

      its not geting better. you still cant get china air as clean as the us air was in 1980

    • @zen-mc4ju
      @zen-mc4ju Před 5 lety

      @@dknowles60 why not close all the factory right? Just like what EU and America used to be. The air will be clean as hundreds ago.

    • @timdarcy8
      @timdarcy8 Před 4 lety

      Living in shanghai for 4 years, the air got worse each year

  • @revanthkrishna5791
    @revanthkrishna5791 Před 5 lety +13

    You never spilled the beans in the video. What is clean coal and how do you clean it?

    • @darksidelead
      @darksidelead Před 5 lety +7

      This is nothing new it's just a scrubber. You can look it up yourself. Basically it's absorbing and filtering the by products so instead of just letting the black smoke go into the atmosphere your capturing it instead

    • @zpmao77
      @zpmao77 Před 4 lety

      Clean coal refers to more complete combustion. Supercritical means it is produces less unwanted gasses. (you get c02 in return)

  • @pakistandotcom7209
    @pakistandotcom7209 Před 5 lety +101

    Chinese is our iron brothers

    • @lijie6431
      @lijie6431 Před 5 lety

      Iron man

    • @Yconntection
      @Yconntection Před 5 lety

      i want to vist Pakisan

    • @mieutac675
      @mieutac675 Před 5 lety +1

      Lol congratulation you just had a brother that trick you into dept trap

    • @user-lv4rz2zn6l
      @user-lv4rz2zn6l Před 5 lety

      @@lijie6431 iron brother,in Chinese language mean The strongest kind of friendship.😂

    • @Kni0002
      @Kni0002 Před 5 lety

      russia sounds more logical

  • @dominicweaver4905
    @dominicweaver4905 Před 4 lety +1

    It's the world cleanest/ most efficient fossil fuel power plant: Not the most out of all power generation.

    • @user-bc7cb8uu7e
      @user-bc7cb8uu7e Před 2 lety

      The video even stated that it couldn't compete with natural gas, so it's not even the cleanest or safest fossil fuel power plant

  • @shauryaseth8859
    @shauryaseth8859 Před 2 lety

    0:53 "kWh/yr" means energy per second in one hour per year lmao

  • @UnwrappingByMimiKoteng
    @UnwrappingByMimiKoteng Před 5 lety +4

    Amazing

  • @user-py6pl3iv2y
    @user-py6pl3iv2y Před 4 lety

    could u guy give me an opinion about this video *for long story please
    ?

  • @XedGeneral
    @XedGeneral Před 5 lety +1

    1:00 "no one is allowed to enter" - someone used Google Translate?

  • @ThomasWright-jw6eo
    @ThomasWright-jw6eo Před rokem

    meanwhile in 2022 china approved the construction of 106 GW powerplants more than the whole of the United Kingdom in one year.

  • @mubaraksadik9484
    @mubaraksadik9484 Před 4 lety +1

    What is amount of coal per year you burn

  • @CUBETechie
    @CUBETechie Před 4 lety

    Did he used also SORBENT ER1 From Poland?

  • @andrewsiamfwamu262
    @andrewsiamfwamu262 Před 4 lety

    what if it finishes in the ocean where will they use

  • @My-Name-is-Khan
    @My-Name-is-Khan Před 5 lety +8

    Welldone china

  • @RobertAdoniasCostaGomes
    @RobertAdoniasCostaGomes Před 5 lety +5

    there's one big problem with this video at 3:10 ... you cannot power anything by burning coal without producing carbon dioxide, because that's the end result of burning elemental carbon, which is the main source of energy in coal...
    they probably remove nitrogen and sulphur compounds from the coal, though, to make it cleaner... and possibly have measures to improve combustion in order to reduce carbon monoxide formation... which is good, since these are harmful pollutants to human health.. but they cannot make a good claim in terms of global warming gases reduction (maybe nitrous oxide which might have some incidental formation - and it is not even cited in the video - but the amounts should be very minimal when compared to carbon dioxide)
    the only way to not produce carbon dioxide is to not burn the coal - you could use an ultra complicated system during (not before) the generation of energy to trap the CO2 in some sort of inorganic salt (like CaCO3), which would require water to come in to the equation too and further mess this up, but it would not be remove during pre-treatment as stated here

  • @gainsbourg66
    @gainsbourg66 Před rokem

    Stupid ending. We have been told so many lies about so called 'green' and 'renewable' energy sources.

  • @scottmmafan925
    @scottmmafan925 Před rokem

    2:25 "There's 50,000 tons packed on board this tanker." Sorry, bro. But you can't put a solid on a ship that transports a liquid. That was a "Bulk Carrier," not a "Tanker."

  • @souravsekharnayak
    @souravsekharnayak Před 5 lety +1

    4 units of 500MW?

  • @WestCoastFlavour
    @WestCoastFlavour Před 5 lety +2

    The #DualFluidReactor is best. #weregoingbacktothemoon !!

  • @rizamohammed4853
    @rizamohammed4853 Před 5 lety +37

    Good Guy Prof.Feng

  • @gottjager760
    @gottjager760 Před 5 lety +18

    Nuclear power is the way forward.

    • @jacobwells8368
      @jacobwells8368 Před 5 lety +3

      @Steve Withers, Your argument is misleading. It does not matter what kind of power plant is built. If 'enemies' they target it, a region will be electrically paralized. Because fun fact : any type of power plant can be destroyed.

    • @jhaz89
      @jhaz89 Před 4 lety

      Yeah it is. It's amazing that more people don't realize this

  • @samuellmani
    @samuellmani Před 5 lety +5

    Even if he removes the dust, NOx, SOx, whatever else going out the stack is CO2. Carbon that used to be underground now up in the air as a colourless greenhouse gases.

    • @pcxPOT
      @pcxPOT Před 5 lety

      how would it work as a greenhouse gas, when it's not actively heating anything? it just absorbs heat but doesn't cause it.

    • @CarlosAM1
      @CarlosAM1 Před 3 lety

      @@pcxPOT how can a blanket keep you hot at night if it doesnt produce heat? It just absorbs heat and doesnt cause it.

    • @pcxPOT
      @pcxPOT Před 3 lety

      @@CarlosAM1 I hope you realise how dumb your comparison is, right? I'm not gonna point out your flawed logic in this.

    • @CarlosAM1
      @CarlosAM1 Před 3 lety

      @@pcxPOT Where is it though? Both trap infrared light and re emit it back, one is a solid, the other a gas. Where is the flaw?

    • @pcxPOT
      @pcxPOT Před 3 lety

      @@CarlosAM1 you said it yourself, one is solid, meaning the sheet trap the warm air, the same thing isnt happening in our atmosphere, the air distributes itself

  • @MultiThatguy7
    @MultiThatguy7 Před 5 lety

    Oh my gosh the narrotor is like oh my gosh

  • @fredfrond6148
    @fredfrond6148 Před 5 lety +1

    From what I can glean is all the pollutants are removed except carbon dioxide. i. e. The main greenhouse causing one.

    • @minus21334
      @minus21334 Před 4 lety

      with the rate their reforestation is going, that wont be a problem. Also they are working hard with the turbine+solar+hydro hybrid power plant, developing nuclear project with europe etc,

  • @greennewdeal5539
    @greennewdeal5539 Před 5 lety +2

    This is like bragging about being 'The World's Tallest Dwarf'. I wonder how much their energy costs. In the US coal energy already costs more than wind or solar, so why bother with coal at all?

    • @nehcooahnait7827
      @nehcooahnait7827 Před 2 lety

      Things will make more sense if you stop transplanting your conceptualization of the rest of the world purely based on how energy industry in the US works.

  • @palmtree_
    @palmtree_ Před 3 lety

    Singapore needs SMR nuclear power plant. Offshore, floating or submerged

  • @tthams73
    @tthams73 Před 4 lety +1

    Where do you think the lithium comes from for the batteries which store electricity produced by windmills and solar panels? It’s mined.

    • @avada0
      @avada0 Před 3 lety +2

      You only need to mine it once though. And don't disperse it into the atmosphere after using it.

    • @CarlosAM1
      @CarlosAM1 Před 3 lety

      @@avada0 some is still lost on recycling. Still tho thats alotta lithium ya gonna mine

    • @avada0
      @avada0 Před 3 lety

      @@CarlosAM1 So? Many mountains worth of other materials were mined. Humanity is good at mining.

    • @CarlosAM1
      @CarlosAM1 Před 3 lety

      @@avada0 yeah, we are also very good at polluting the hell out of places we mine.

    • @avada0
      @avada0 Před 3 lety +1

      @@CarlosAM1 So? No pain, no gain.
      When refined minerals start to grow on trees, we can stop mining.

  • @reynaldolazaro2196
    @reynaldolazaro2196 Před rokem

    Who industrialized first? UK, Europe and US 200 years longer than China. So who is the highest carbon emitter? Now China uses carbonless coal wow

  • @kevinlane1219
    @kevinlane1219 Před 5 lety

    I find it weird that each person uses his own language. I mean, one would expect them to use one language for someone's convenience.

  • @tcz7742
    @tcz7742 Před 4 lety

    They are not trying to shift away from coal-burning plants are building many of but they are clean. Good for them they get it.

  • @rajeevarts398
    @rajeevarts398 Před 5 lety

    Hope we all learn for them !!

    • @rajeevarts398
      @rajeevarts398 Před 3 lety

      @@FowlorTheRooster1990 what happened now ?

  • @goodtimes333888
    @goodtimes333888 Před 5 lety +1

    A great way to transition to renewables

  • @savingmemoryarchives
    @savingmemoryarchives Před 4 lety

    Why do they show the cooling towers, as if they are emitting smoke ? People just don't know what they are talking about.

  • @yanmuruo
    @yanmuruo Před 5 lety +1

    国家电网的火力发电站的标准一直以来都是最高的

  • @ethanskinner1002
    @ethanskinner1002 Před 5 lety

    Hydro power?

  • @jililin2078
    @jililin2078 Před 5 lety +1

    This is where the so called clean coal comes from

  • @darkenergy9893
    @darkenergy9893 Před 5 lety +15

    Well done. Hope we can replace all the old poeer generators by this one.

  • @ensiyeitu1012
    @ensiyeitu1012 Před rokem

    There's no form of energy that doesn't require mining.

  • @chuckschenck3045
    @chuckschenck3045 Před 5 lety

    How can anything be clean when you have a deadly waste to dump.

  • @alanmetclaff6718
    @alanmetclaff6718 Před 5 lety

    @4.37 CGi!

  • @fredblogsmac.5697
    @fredblogsmac.5697 Před 4 lety +1

    where doues the co2 go ?

  • @cooper1507
    @cooper1507 Před 3 lety

    Googles: De Regor
    Me: Oh...neat

  • @reis1185
    @reis1185 Před měsícem

    Inner Mongolia is literally a dessert

  • @chenh02
    @chenh02 Před 5 lety

    No metter how dirty it is, if you dont use it, try use a candle.

  • @magnushederstjerna5975

    Windmills Are a good idea... IF YOU PLACE THEM IN THE OCEAN!

  • @funny-video-YouTube-channel

    Nice power station. How much does it cost to produce and ship the coal ?
    *Wind and sunshine are free.* One can never compete with free fuel for long :-)

    • @illuminate4622
      @illuminate4622 Před 5 lety +2

      epSos.de they are free, but wind and solar plants require huge initial investment. Also storage, which costs yet like a hundred times more than the wind and solar generators themselves.

    • @jaylynnshane774
      @jaylynnshane774 Před 5 lety +1

      No, but then the amount of area to make these powerplants are HUUUGGGEEE.

    • @Eric-ye5yz
      @Eric-ye5yz Před 4 lety

      epSos … I agree but we must give credit for effort.

  • @susaneyre4837
    @susaneyre4837 Před 3 lety +6

    China, globally, has the largest supply of sewage resource - so they should consider this technology coming out of Vancouver, B.C. For 10 years Vancouvers' False Creek Thermal Energy Utility has been financially 'self-supporting', heating it's buildings and supplying its hot water requirements by capturing its' thermal sewage heat, eliminating 60% of regular building carbon emissions, and it provides 70% of the areas heating requirements annually, except for in the coldest of weather. This thermal technology also provides the all - important cooling for the intense summer heat. All of you living in cities could use this technology -it's local, sustainable and a 24/7 energy source, with plenty of room for further developmen of sewage as a fuel, or generating electricity. Solar is just one big business technology of going Green. Consider if all the cities in the world used their sewage problem, turning it in to an energy solution instead. Providing local long-term employment, low impact on the environment, and demands on infrastructure. Vancouver now has 4 thermal heating districts, making a profit and expanding a 5th . Green Initiative Vancouver -check it out!

  • @clintonalvaro5491
    @clintonalvaro5491 Před 3 lety +3

    clean coal really isnt clean. I've been a powerplant engineer in "clean coal" for years now. the hypocrisy is uncanny

  • @mohammedhasir4282
    @mohammedhasir4282 Před 5 lety +1

    Love from india...

  • @jeanlabrek8454
    @jeanlabrek8454 Před 4 lety +10

    Coal energy can be clean if using silica sand and limestone fluidised bed _ or pyrolytic gasification-flox technology like in the Valmet plants.

  • @aliexsimth4980
    @aliexsimth4980 Před 5 lety +5

    Trump is good for keeping talking, while the Chinese people are good for working hard and keeping doing. That's the tiny thing causes big difference.
    Now we can talk about clean coal, at the end of this video it says no clean coal due to this and that, however, that's not true. Prof. Feng has clearly shown it. He and many others know it's hard to make clean coal, so, step by step they simply work on this, and worked out.

  • @rich3222
    @rich3222 Před 3 lety

    It catched the carbon( soot) not catches the carbon dioxide.That is what matters

  • @jeromy2653
    @jeromy2653 Před rokem

    Chinese scientists are the best in the world when it comes to efficiency regarding coal technologies and also nanotechnology carbon capture. The earth shouldn't be afraid of using coal for electricity!

  • @ericksonmontalbo7995
    @ericksonmontalbo7995 Před 2 lety

    I hope united nations for climate change will start and investigate how this coal power plant produce low co2 emmisions to help thier advocacy in coal burning issue.

  • @SPLITSLEEVE
    @SPLITSLEEVE Před 3 lety +3

    On April 6 2021, Wuhan had a very large storm of Sulphur Dioxide. The city was gripped by this storm due to circulations of wind which locked the Sulphur Dioxide in the city. A coal power plant in Wuhan also added Sulphur Dioxide to 1760 micro grams per cubic meters. You should not be exposed to Sulphur Dioxide any more than 15 minutes at 500 micrograms per cubic meter. The coal power plant should have been shut down for 18 hours, people told to conserve energy, and power rerouted to Wuhan.

  • @JoseFloresEC
    @JoseFloresEC Před 5 lety

    Have clean coal, really clean coal.
    Lol

  • @aaroncohen5570
    @aaroncohen5570 Před 5 lety +1

    cleanest power plant except every single hydro, wind, and solar installation in the world.

    • @kylesteamguy4758
      @kylesteamguy4758 Před 4 lety +1

      Annnndddd..... every single hydro, wind, and solar installation in the world (and all that can or will ever be built) won't even come CLOSE to humans' consumption of energy. Where will the rest of the juice come from? Clean plants like these. Hopefully something even better. But it will require a good intelligent mix of things, anyone who believes in a 100% renewable future (and that includes a few corporate CEO's) have absolutely no grasp of the magnitude of the problem.

    • @avada0
      @avada0 Před 3 lety

      And nuclear.

  • @williamhill1552
    @williamhill1552 Před 2 lety

    Good job u deserve it.😀

  • @Arturo-lapaz
    @Arturo-lapaz Před 11 měsíci

    4:33 There is a far more efficient way to generate power from coal, it is called ' Integrated gasification combined cycle, with real efficiency of over 62%
    Using GE Aeroderivatives gas turbine engines after gasification, cleaning of any coal , of course, preferred are anthracitic coal varieties.
    See General Electric Aero derivatives.

    • @gregorymalchuk272
      @gregorymalchuk272 Před 7 měsíci

      I would love to see the literature for the 62% if uou have it handy. For some reaaon, i haven't seen efficiencies for integrated gasifier combined cycle coal power generating units to be more than about 47%. There just seems to be a lot of thermal losses associated with gasification. They do seem to be more agnostic of coal quality though. Wai Gao Qiao Unit 3 has achieved 47.5% net electrical efficiency just by rasing the steam temperature amd pressure and employing double reheat.

  • @karenmcnugget4551
    @karenmcnugget4551 Před 5 lety +2

    Hi

  • @bh9497
    @bh9497 Před 5 lety

    Start your show, westerners netizens' comments😁

  • @SPLITSLEEVE
    @SPLITSLEEVE Před 2 lety

    Wuhan Feb 2 2022 Sulfur dioxide emissions 1039 micro grams (from Nullschool) . This is so easy to fix by removing the sulfur and mercury before the coal is fired. I sent a file to Wuhan (sinosure), also to (mee) government in China yesterday to show how easy it is to remove the sulfur. Another area with high sulfur emissions is Luohuang Power.

    • @SPLITSLEEVE
      @SPLITSLEEVE Před 2 lety

      Feb 10 2022 4 pm local time. 2,356 micrograms per cubic meters.

    • @gregorymalchuk272
      @gregorymalchuk272 Před 7 měsíci

      How do you remove sulfur from coal before combustion?

    • @SPLITSLEEVE
      @SPLITSLEEVE Před 7 měsíci

      @@gregorymalchuk272 Very simple. .You heat the crushed coal to 500 C which will turn sulphur and mercury in gas form , making it easy to remove from the coal. Heat exchangers can be used so that you are hardly using any energy to remove the sulphur and mercury.

  • @sdjnwhyNZ
    @sdjnwhyNZ Před 5 lety

    Saving money, environment, and lives.

  • @danielwdunn
    @danielwdunn Před 4 lety

    The title of the video is extremely misleading.

  • @Deaftractor
    @Deaftractor Před 11 měsíci

    That good clean air come out tail pipe but question why still raises hotter temperatures??? Too hot blower out of tail pipes, too hot radiator come out hot air, engine too hot out of and into air. Too many air conditioners R-410 and R-32 compression high pressure too hot blower air into sky air. Sigh😢

  • @308_Negra_Arroyo_Lane
    @308_Negra_Arroyo_Lane Před 5 lety

    Hurry up with molten salt reactors.

    • @avada0
      @avada0 Před 3 lety

      I fear in today's collective idiocy based political climate all novel nuclear technologies will turn out to be vaporware.
      One can only hope that all the pollution won't be catastrophic before renewable gets good enough.