Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.
U.S. NAVY MAIN BATTERY FIRE CONTROL NAVAL GUNFIRE TRAINING FILM 81600
Vložit
- čas přidán 20. 04. 2015
- Support Our Channel : / periscopefilm
Made in 1954, this U.S. Navy film shows the main battery fire control procedures aboard a heavy cruiser or battleship. The film shows a target being acquired, general quarters being sounded (1:30), and the general alarm being sounded (1:50). At 2:00, the fire control procedures are shown as the ship prepares to fire its main battery. The bridge, combat information center, control forward (location of the gunnery officer), and control aft are shown. Spot one and two are shown at 3:19, as well as the battery control director, which can fix the location of enemy targets. The Main Battery Targeting room is shown at 3:37. At 7:16, the Main Battery Officer gives the order to make a primary attack using a given fire control set-up. At 9;35, the sight angle and deflection as well as other values received from the plotting room are input, to align the turret with the target. At 12:22, the order to shoot is given and the results assessed. Salvos are now launched and at 13:00, rapid loading of the guns is seen with ammunition bags and shells being quickly moved into position and guns fired when ready. At 16:00 the ship secures from general quarters and the target is pronounced destroyed.
This film is part of the Periscope Film LLC archive, one of the largest historic military, transportation, and aviation stock footage collections in the USA. Entirely film backed, this material is available for licensing in 24p HD. For more information visit www.PeriscopeFi...
These defense training films kept studio orchestra musicians gainfully employed for decades.
I served aboard a heavy cruiser during the Vietnam war. The film is accurate, but the we didn't speak over our sound powered phones in the way these guys do in the film. They sound robotic as if trying to adhere to a script. We said essentially the same things, but in a much more natural and faster way. When they would report that they had switched their turrets or mounts into "automatic" we would instead say "auto". We did everything they did, but we spoke much more causally because it was everyday and routine to us. These guys sound much more serious and formal. This was apparently on the USS Burlingame, CA-905 whereas my ship was the USS Saint Paul, CA-73.
Thank you for your service! I saw the USS Saint Paul in Bremerton, Washington in 1976 next to the USS Canberra
and USS Missouri. They were in Mothballs at that time. We could not board the Missouri for they closed it for the next day they towed it into the bay and filmed the MaCarthur movie.
TRADOC film, naturally it's unnatural for an experienced salt like you. :-)
It's a training film, Joe. Notice the turrets move butt the Director is always looking Forward.
They must have painted the targets on that miserable Mk-10's 3-inch screen...
BTW: You might like my book..."A FamilyGram From Vietnam" ...check it out on Amazon or Kindle.
Fred "Foxx" Nesbitt, FTG-2, SS.
Mr.Didit- First off, as a third generation Veteran, Thank You for your service! Second, a BIG Thank You for possibly saving my Dad's ass in Nam- he was in a grunt unit (11 Bravo) from 69-70.
I thought this film was quite scripted as well, but, you pretty much filled in those blanks I had about Procedure on Ship. I'm assuming this system was similar between say, Iowa Class and your heavy cruiser. I believe the ONLY difference would be rate of fire with the Main Battery, correct??
My dad served on the sister ship to the Saint Paul, USS Helena, CA75. He loved that ship.
11:39 I had no idea that the radar could show the splashes from the (missed) shots! omg that is so fckn cool!
I visited USS Alabama, a WWII battleship. Went inside one of the 16" turrets. What seems to be huge on the outside, is very cramped on the inside. You had better be exactly where you need to be, or you will be squashed like a bug.
I peeked through the turret optical range-finder....It felt like a sleeping giant had just opened an eye. Uss Alabama is berthed in Mobile Bay.
A Baltimore-Class heavy cruiser! They sported nine 8"/55 caliber main guns in 3 triple turrets. They faithfully and proudly served the US Navy in WW2, Korea, and Vietnam, in the latter the USS St. Paul the USS Newport News ended their days as the last two 8"/55 gun heavy cruisers in the US Navy, and provided gunfire support for troops ashore and struck hard at targets in North Vietnam. Four Baltimore-Class ships were later converted into the Boston and Albany-Class guided missile cruisers.
I always think about how people had to _figure all this out._ That "Battle Bill" book isn't a stone tablet that descended from on high (not literally, anyway), humans had to sit down and decide how to write it-Imagine all the discussions and arguments people must have had about who talks to whom and when about what, and all the catastrophes and casualties and ones-that-got-away that spurred them to change their procedures.
How our grandpas had played in World of Warships, update 0.0.1 beta :)
You means alpha
Brilliant comment
Thank you for preserving our heritage.
I like the ending where they are polishing the equipment. Nice touch haha.
Very informative!
There's a reason why rate of fire is overrated. Ships rarely fire at max fire rate for any extended period of time. Even after proper ranging, the enemy target may make a course change and the entire process is redone. Another possibility is that their own ship change course which then means recalculation have to be done. Or the target might disappear and pop back up later. Another possibility may be an order to switch targets to another ship.
They may fire at max RoF for a dozen round at most before stopping due to various circumstances.
Rate of fire gets more important when our FCS gets more advanced.
What does "FCS" mean?
@@patrickmcleod111 Fire Control System
The rangekeeper computer on Iowa battleship could almost instantly calculate any changes based on own ship manouvers. However if the enemy ship was constantly turning, (as opposed to sailing straight) when rounds are flying then its going to miss most likely. It could also be easier to spot the salvoes from airplane spotter or radar in salvo firing.
Rate of Fire wasnt overrated at the battle of jutland tho 😊
In two weeks I'm taking the fire control tour on the USS North Carolina. :)
ColKorn1965 nice it’s my favorite ship and my grandpa help saved the USS North Carolina from scrap when he was a child
how was it
I’ve been on it over 120 times, I love it
I grew up next to the NC and now all I do is watch old footage of WW2 naval ships and airplanes
Fabulous engineering and manufacturer of one of the most beautiful vessels ,. And for what?. Look at the bottom of the ocean
Good to see the guys unloosen their top button and relax after their glorious victory. Story was a little different in the Battle of Savo Island.
A very informative video. Thanks
1:20 GQ ( general quarters) 15:52 secure from General quarters
I am surprised that so many orders are not repeated back.
I came here for the Brad Golding!
@@TonyLovell I came here for the Tony Lovell!
solid gold
Hey, that guy didn't get blown off A Turret!
Looks to me like a Baltimore class heavy CA, but I may be wrong. Anyone know which ship this actually is?
Jpdillon it looks like it’s most likely a Baltimore class heavy cruiser, either that or it’s 1 of the two Des Moines class heavy cruisers they built, but those weren’t completed until after the war
It's a Baltimore class heavy cruiser for the ship has (2) smoke stacks. Also, the turret gun loaders are loading (2) powder bags for each shell. The USS Salem had the shell and power together as one and that gun could load at any angle. These guns were lowered for loading.
Hull number says it’s the Macon
1st Naval Gunfire! Hawaii, Semper Fi
Interesting, and effective. There were a lot of folks in the chain of command, this is a guess on my part because of the lack of apparent computers. There was an article that I once read, which was confirmed on a CZcams clip, which claimed that the number of people needed to operate some modern day Naval ships is much less than formally needed say 50 years ago? Once such ship on a CZcams clip had only 68 people because of computerized automation. I'm sure that there are a number of onboard safeguards against computer viruses? Yikes!!
I think that sailor at 9:46 has the most interesting battle station on the ship! Wonder what his job is?
Looks like he's running wiring and inspecting things, getting ready to head inside for the firing
I noticed that as well and thought to myself “Thats not a very safe looking place to be”.
One of the tricks of a naval gunfight is called "chasing splashes" .
Since the enemy missed, he will correct his aim, and the next salvo will fall on you.
But if you steer towards the splash, the process of correcting will mean the next salvo will not fall near the splash.
Bracket and half is the method best used. Chasing splashes never gets you to the target. I was an FTG in the Navy during the Vietnam War. We set up the computer and radar to fire the ship's guns.
i came here because of world of warships
The vulnerable link here seems to be the 'Spot 1' station as it is the only one that can communicate with the turrets. Everything else seems to be either redundant or located deep in the ship that a shell exploding there is likely fatal anyway. Spot 1 however is in an easily accessible place for enemy shells to enter and explode, and is the only place that can order the turrets to load? What happens if a shell hits Spot 1 and explodes, but the ship is otherwise undamaged?
Did you miss the entire first 5 minutes of the video, where they addressed the potential for the spotting stations fore or aft taking each other's duties up, and fire control being individually independent in each turret in case of damage further up the chain?
In other words, the question of, "redundancy," was addressed at the beginning of the video, for each turret, both fore and one aft, with or without the support of their primary supporting spotting stations.
You could answer your own question by simply paying attention.
I'm just sayin'✌️
Yes I did watch the first 5 minutes and am very aware of all the redundancy in the ship.
However, what I was saying was, Spot 1 is the only place with communication to the turrets. Spot 2 can take up the spotting duties of Spot 1 if the latter is carried away by a shell, but nowhere does it mention another communications circuit between Spot 2 and the turrets - the only communications the turrets have is with each other and Spot 1.
@@Debbiebabe69
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Please refer to page A10 for a start.
maritime.org/doc/firecontrol/index.htm
Most all of those sound-powered circuits are available in multiple places, and even if Spot 2 doesn't have a dedicated circuit to the turrets (I'm not sure about a Baltimore class CA, but on an Iowa class BB, Spot 2 does have one), there'll be another circuit that they can use, and at least two other circuits not intended for that, but that could be used in an emergency.
If all else fails, the turrets can aim and fire on local control. (And that came up in real combat: look up the Battle off Samar. USS Johnston had their turrets on local control for most of the battle after a Japanese CA blew their director to bits.)
@@logansorenssen And they did an amazing job under local control. Taffy 3's defense should be taught in every history class.
do you really need the counter its in the way
Copyright infringement avoidance.
@@davidhoffman1278 Put the counter at the top horizontally or the side vertically. Much is lost visually because of terrible placement of the timer or indifference of the Periscope Film people.
@@gf-qx8mv And make it smaller
Here's the issue: Tens of thousands of films similar to this one have been lost forever -- destroyed -- and many others are at risk. Our company preserves these precious bits of history one film at a time. How do we afford to do that? By selling them as stock footage to documentary filmmakers and broadcasters. If we did not have a counter, we could not afford to post films like these online, and no films would be preserved. It's that simple. So we ask you to bear with the watermark and timecodes.
In the past we tried many different systems including placing our timer at the bottom corner of our videos. What happened? Unscrupulous CZcams users downloaded our vids, blew them up so the timer was not visible, and re-posted them as their own content! We had to use content control to have the videos removed and shut down these channels. It's hard enough work preserving these films and posting them, without having to spend precious time dealing with policing thievery -- and not what we devoted ourselves to do.
Love our channel and want to support what we do? You can help us save and post more orphaned films! Support us on Patreon: www.patreon.com/PeriscopeFilm Even a really tiny contribution can make a difference.
1:25 - I thought they use a tape record or something for that battlestation sound ^^
Alaska class cruiser. A mini Iowa.
Is there a way to donate without having to make a patreon account?
Ahh yes. My evening programming.
God bless our navy
How much would it cost to build a ship like that today ! . I wonder how much of the ship would be automated and, would they need the same number of people to man such a ship.
The Burkes are about $2 billion.
@@paulmorissette5863 Yeah, but they don't have heavy guns, IMHO 5"/54s (and 5"/62s) are secondary class batteries. They need The 12"/50s from the Alaska-class with the automation of the 76mm/62 from the Perry-class. That's reach out and touch someone 35km away with Rapid Fire.
"You sank my battleship!"
Swim call .😁
2x Citadel 4x penetration 11:36
Enemy cruiser foundered.
My comment is completely irrelevant. Did anyone notice the guns being elevated to the firing elevation first; then to battery for loading?
8:02 , 12:01 Quentin Tarrantino granpa ??? :)
Are those guns mounted on gimbals?
What's the MOS for "Bugler"?
I wondered that too. Did the Navy ever actually deploy buglers on warships? I suppose they would be necessary to play taps for at sea burials.
**I remember my first wartime patrol aboard a heavy cruiser in WW2 in 1943. At one point, the intercom opened up with the message, "go to general quarters". Suddenly I saw people running around like crazy, so I did the same. I ran all over that darn ship, but I never could locate the general's quarters! I didn't even know why they wanted all of us to go to the general's quarters in the first place! I thought maybe the general was hosting a surprise party for the crew, and I imagined that he must have some HUGE quarters, for the entire crew to fit in there together all at once!**
But then I started hearing our guns firing, so I decided to give up on attending the general's party, and instead I ran to my station to help fire back at whoever was firing at us. I've always wondered if the enemy somehow knew about the party, and chose that time to attack us, knowing we would be tying one on with the general, and be caught by surprise!
I guess you finally figured out what General quarters means
Freaking hilarious
😎⚓🇺🇸 USS OKLAHOMA City CG5 here 6"/47 Triple Gun Turetts an 5"38 Dual purpose gun mount ..😎⚓ US Navy Gunners Mate Guns . GMG1 ...
Had the pleasure of going aboard her in Yokosuka in '77, a shipmate from a prior duty station showed me around. Lovely ship. We replenished her frequently, I was on the Wichita, AOR-1.
oh nice!
If they wee in combat they would be moving a lot faster than in this film
11:26. Those helmets... I'm sure there's a reason for them, but that doesn't stop them looking comically over sized.
They do but they accommodate earphones.
Accommodate the headset portion of the individual communication device.
Makes you think of Rick Moranis as 'Dark Helmet' in Space Balls.
@@jamesbrowne6351 They were the basis for the rebel fleet trooper helmets in the original Star Wars.
11:27 Helmets are looking like they're operating the death star
The intro music sounded like a Flash Gordon movie.
11:36 firing
CA-139 ? USS Salem? Just guessing
It's a Baltimore class heavy cruiser for the ship has (2) smoke stacks. Also, the turret gun loaders are loading (2) powder bags for each shell. The USS Salem had the shell and power together as one and that gun could load at any angle. These guns were lowered for loading.
Looks like the Macon
I have looked for the USS Burlingame CA-905 online and have been given the runaround.
Where can I get one of those whistles tho
Good - if you want something to make you feel sleepy Worked for me
most likely USS Roanoke (CL-145) the commander was creed burlingame at the time
While commanding the Silversides, the ship and crew received a presidential citation and Burlingame earned two Silver Stars and three Navy Crosses. As commander of the 182d Submarine Division in the Pacific, he was awarded the Legion of Merit.[2]
Following World War II, Burlingame served in various assignments, including command of USS Roanoke from 15 September 1953 to 3 March 1955.[5] He retired in 1957, at the rank of rear admiral
😊
In 1954 were there no Black sailors?
There are, US navy is the first branch of the US military to integrate all racial backgrounds. Its just that there aren't that many back in the day since the rest of US society isn't as open.
Plenty of them back in the day. Quit stirring the racial pot
@@FN_FAL_4_ever Your just dogging a valid question.
@@neurofiedyamato8763 The Coasties were more ahead of the Navy in this area.
@Dennis Wilson Long mixed bag reply. Easier to say there was a lack of Blacks in Gunners Mate and Fire Controlmen rates on this ship.
13:05 rapid fire
Why aren't they wearing flash protection??
Bote
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🎖