For some reason, I always felt like his piano arrangement is just so much more sad. Like there is more pain more longing in the piano than the violin, it misses the melancholy feel but takes a new draws out the notes and sorrow. I love them both so much.
I agree with you, and this brought a tear to my eye, I don’t know why though, maybe I was remembering your lie in April, I really recommend it, it’s beautiful
I totally agree, and I definitely think the major reason for it is that as a solo version, the performer must take the role of what would originally be a duet by himself only, which makes it definitely sadder in my opinion because the piece is about Love Sorrow and the player must reflect on it alone. That and Rachmaninoff's masterful arrangement skills make the magic for this piece on the piano and convert it in a very touching piece indeed.
I don't think so; have you heard Kreisler's tone, it's something that no man can achieve on the piano because of the natural predisposition of the Violin to a more melodic sound. The juiciness of the Violin makes you feel every single note, while on the piano every layer is something that distracts from the main melody. Though it is just my opinion.
Does a more beautiful 4 and a half minutes of music exist? The combination of pianist (extraordinary varieties of touch and tempo) plus composer (the astonishing, labyrinthine chromatic richness of his creative imagination) creates a truly transcendent vision of Kreisler's lovely melody.
This is incredible. From amazon "Window in Time" description: This collection of Rachmaninoff's solo piano performances relies on a mix of old and new technologies. Between 1919 and 1929, Rachmaninoff cut these 19 performances to piano rolls, which would then be played back through reproducing pianos capable of accurately re-creating the original performances through pneumatic devices that animated the rolls with living nuances and shades--a facet that differentiated the classier reproduction keyboards from the more common "player pianos." This set updates the technology with electronic devices--transparently, though expertly, replacing the pneumatics. Played back on a Bösendorfer Reproducing Piano, this collection sounds astounding, full of Rachmaninoff's lickety-quick motion and his punching intensity when striking the keys. There are 18 Rachmaninoff selections--some of them collaborations--and one gem, "The Star-Spangled Banner," taken to new places in this 1919 reading. --Andrew Bartlett
Absolutely captivated by Rachmaninoff and the demonstration of his mastery in this recording. Just returned for the umpteenth time because of a comment on TwosetViolin's latest video, to be enthralled once more
Fantastic piano playing, just about impossible these days to hear anything close to what we hear here! Can anybody imagine anybody these days palying this piece? Just impossible!
This and the partita for violin solo transcriptions are wonderful and mind-blowing transcriptions. My favorites, indeed. Thanks, I had already listened to this piano roll recording but with lower quality.
@@christopherczajasager9030 I don't know if I listened to their interpretation. I remember that when I listened to this piece for the first time was Kasia's interpretation and I loved it. Then I searched a little bit more and listened to 4/5 more pianists playing the piece but at the end I enjoyed more Kasia's version. She use a lot the pedal in this piece so that's why I was surprised of how it really was supposed to sound. I think I still prefer Kasia's version but this practically sound like another piece, and I love it.
@@nicolag1544 perhaps.....mad....but MP's use of the pedals in Chopin is conventional and ignores much of the composer's revolutionary znd structural own notation.listen to Cortot,Novaes, I.Friedman..Padereski!
one of my friends sent me this. if you see this comment, I want u to know that there's maybe a way to forgive you... I don't know why now, but we'll see.
I'd expect most guys to send their potential gf Liebstraum and not Leibsleid if they liked her. But I guess it depends on your relationship. But if he's only a friend, he wouldn't sent you this if he weren't in love. You'll already have to be in love with him in order for him to say, "I don't love you."
It is a modern recording. A machine is playing. No living person is playing the piano. It is a sophisticated player piano using piano-rolls made by Rachmaninoff much earlier. For what it is, the result is pretty impressive, but still nowhere near as interesting as Rachmaninoff's actual sound recordings. It is dismaying to me how few people seem to understand what they are listening to here. The process is clearly described in the CD liner notes. Someone gave me this CD years ago, and I only listened to it once.
Man how does it work? Is this really Rachmaninoff? Do people have to play this piece how we ear in this video to play it how Rachmaninoff did? I mean,CAN YOU ASSURE THAT I’M LISTENING TO RACHMANINOFF’S LIEBESLEID?(😂)
It's remarkable, isn't it? The Ampico reproducing piano company convinced Rachmaninoff to try their system; his reaction: "Gentlemen, you have provided a gift! My playing!" Anyway, the reproducing piano mechanism replicated Rachmaninoff's playing of the keys and pedal, and in this recording a 9' grand piano was fitted with the mechanism. My reaction is much like yours: as if the ghost of Rachmaninoff himself was playing. 'A window in time' indeed!
Other than that Rachmaninoff obviously played this on a different instrument, were they even able to accurately capture the sustain pedal on piano rolls?
Is this really Rachmaninoff? It sounds too good. Also it doesn't really sound like another recording of this piece done by him, very different interpretation.
He did a second piano roll performance, the original you heard was actually recorded in a performance hall while this is a piano roll that he played, then placed to a modern piano
czcams.com/video/gRO8EcvTl4c/video.html I think you can understand a bit more why this is high quality in the linked vid. I know nothing about recording technology or anything related to it, but i believe that there's a way to remove the rain like sounds
I find it endearing that many people have started to listen to classical music due to your lie in April ( it was the opposite for me I watched it because I like classical music I’d give it a 10/10 beautiful show)
For some reason, I always felt like his piano arrangement is just so much more sad. Like there is more pain more longing in the piano than the violin, it misses the melancholy feel but takes a new draws out the notes and sorrow. I love them both so much.
I agree with you, and this brought a tear to my eye, I don’t know why though, maybe I was remembering your lie in April, I really recommend it, it’s beautiful
I believe it’s because of the more layers of sounds and melodies that is possible on a piano
I totally agree, and I definitely think the major reason for it is that as a solo version, the performer must take the role of what would originally be a duet by himself only, which makes it definitely sadder in my opinion because the piece is about Love Sorrow and the player must reflect on it alone. That and Rachmaninoff's masterful arrangement skills make the magic for this piece on the piano and convert it in a very touching piece indeed.
I don't think so;
have you heard Kreisler's tone, it's something that no man can achieve on the piano because of the natural predisposition of the Violin to a more melodic sound. The juiciness of the Violin makes you feel every single note, while on the piano every layer is something that distracts from the main melody.
Though it is just my opinion.
It's because us pianist feel more (mental) pain than violinists...
Such a nice pianist, he should be a composer.
Imagine Listening to this piece not knowing that someone on the other side of the world is listening at the same time
Ikr smh he's not dead or anything is he?
Hahaha
He is a composer actually
@@minhthanhpham4486 That's the joke
This recording is so clear. I cant believe it's from Rachmaninoff
@@MegaUpstairs it's fascinating how much technology had improved back in Rach's time
@@MegaUpstairs wow I really need to buy some of those rolls and a automatic piano once I winthe lottery..
czcams.com/video/gGmILVnE_dg/video.html Here is a recording played by his hands
@@MegaUpstairs The piano roll recording couldn't record the nuances. It works like a MIDI instrument
I mean by the quality of the performance, if this isn't Rachmaninoff its the next Rachmaninoff; sublime
I do not want to cry but ..... it's beautiful
❤
I LOVE RACHMANINOV !!!
It’s impossible not to
@@troy5094 stupidity can outperform
everytime i feel like the notes are fading away, it comes right back with such a powerful yet beautiful comeback, man i love Rachmaninoff
Does a more beautiful 4 and a half minutes of music exist? The combination of pianist (extraordinary varieties of touch and tempo) plus composer (the astonishing, labyrinthine chromatic richness of his creative imagination) creates a truly transcendent vision of Kreisler's lovely melody.
This is incredible.
From amazon "Window in Time" description:
This collection of Rachmaninoff's solo piano performances relies on a mix of old and new technologies. Between 1919 and 1929, Rachmaninoff cut these 19 performances to piano rolls, which would then be played back through reproducing pianos capable of accurately re-creating the original performances through pneumatic devices that animated the rolls with living nuances and shades--a facet that differentiated the classier reproduction keyboards from the more common "player pianos." This set updates the technology with electronic devices--transparently, though expertly, replacing the pneumatics. Played back on a Bösendorfer Reproducing Piano, this collection sounds astounding, full of Rachmaninoff's lickety-quick motion and his punching intensity when striking the keys. There are 18 Rachmaninoff selections--some of them collaborations--and one gem, "The Star-Spangled Banner," taken to new places in this 1919 reading. --Andrew Bartlett
Thank you, man. I was looking for some information about this beatiful piece...
That's marvelous. Thanks for sharing this piece of history with us
I love Rachmaninov his music so much!! And his playing as well
What wonderful musicianship. Simply the BEST: Rachmaninoff
This piece means everything to me i love it so much
❤
His left hand in those first few measures has me obsessed with trying to imitate this performance as accurately as possible. Very tricky Rach.
Perfect, seemingly effortless. I doubt there was ever a greater pianist than Rachmaninov!
Absolutely captivated by Rachmaninoff and the demonstration of his mastery in this recording. Just returned for the umpteenth time because of a comment on TwosetViolin's latest video, to be enthralled once more
Fantastic piano playing, just about impossible these days to hear anything close to what we hear here! Can anybody imagine anybody these days palying this piece? Just impossible!
Amazing and beautiful in every way ... thanks for sharing only his close Friend Vladimir Horowitz plays on the same Level.
So distinctive style and phrasing!
Крейслер - Рахманинов
"Радость и муки любви"!
Феерически гениальное исполнение ! Эти тысячи нот записаны рукой генияв дар будущим поколениям !
This has very good sound for what was originally a piano roll.
Rachmaninoff's performance is, of course, beyond comment.
An excelent pianist as well to say noting about the composer himself...
Unbelievable what certain genius's mind can do
Bro Rachmaninoff's playstyle is an entertainer, he would probably would love jazz style or blues style music :>
He redefined rubato, and made it into an art in itself.
This and the partita for violin solo transcriptions are wonderful and mind-blowing transcriptions. My favorites, indeed. Thanks, I had already listened to this piano roll recording but with lower quality.
What partita
@@ahdyabdelatif czcams.com/video/N8BmjTtonKg/video.html
Do you think you can just forget it?
Thank u!
이거 들으면 라흐마니노프 안좋아할 수가 없지 진짜 쥰내 사랑스러움
本当に美しい…言葉では表せない。
I'm surprised how he practically doesn't use the sustain pedal
Nonsense.just uses it correctly in contrast to Pollini, BRENDEL and too many today
@@christopherczajasager9030 I don't know if I listened to their interpretation. I remember that when I listened to this piece for the first time was Kasia's interpretation and I loved it. Then I searched a little bit more and listened to 4/5 more pianists playing the piece but at the end I enjoyed more Kasia's version. She use a lot the pedal in this piece so that's why I was surprised of how it really was supposed to sound. I think I still prefer Kasia's version but this practically sound like another piece, and I love it.
@@christopherczajasager9030 pollini doesn't use the pedal correctly? Are you mad?
@@nicolag1544 perhaps.....mad....but MP's use of the pedals in Chopin is conventional and ignores much of the composer's revolutionary znd structural own notation.listen to Cortot,Novaes, I.Friedman..Padereski!
The power of big hands and a perfect legato and obviously a bit of rachmaninoff's sauce
This. Is. Mastery.
이렇게나 사랑이 흘러 넘치는데...
PURE BEAUTY !!!
He really is a cut above, what an exceptional person.
Genious , Genious really
Just amazing. The genius of Rachmaninoff.
Many people think this is fake, but i think this is the real rachmaninoff. I can hear rachmaninoff style in this record
That's definitely him. You can feel his personality by his playing, and if you try hard enough you can even see him playing the piano.
@@erezsolomon3838 ???? second part of the comment is a picture of delusion
@@Whatismusic123 its a joke
@@gordonwu6828 it is definitely not. You underestimate how delusional the average classical music listener is.
@@Whatismusic123 what do u mean by average classical music listener ?
bro this recording is much more clear and loud
Who played this one? The accents and staccato are so impressive that they lead the play to the highest quality
라흐마니노프 본인의 연주라네요
Rachmaninoff himself:>
Cant be himself.. it seems to be recorded within 20years at most, so good sound quality compared to other musics played by rachmaninoff
@@user-gp9pr6vk6n피아노롤 연주입니다.
오르골처럼 종이에 구멍을 뚫어주고 그 종이를 넣으면 그대로 연주해주는 자동 피아노가 있었어요.
그 종이를 현대의 피아노에 넣고 녹음한거죠.
@@user-es9ui3cc3x he also made modern recordings with RCA Victor and with Edison in NJ. He was a man of the 20th century, not the 17th
further confirmation that miracles exist..
(and am not talking about the technology only)
Wonderful!
Heavy edited without a doubt! Listen to the real (acoustic) recordings of this giant.
bravo👏🎵
You too 👍
....Delicious !
one of my friends sent me this. if you see this comment, I want u to know that there's maybe a way to forgive you... I don't know why now, but we'll see.
He must like you if he sends you this.
I'd expect most guys to send their potential gf Liebstraum and not Leibsleid if they liked her. But I guess it depends on your relationship. But if he's only a friend, he wouldn't sent you this if he weren't in love. You'll already have to be in love with him in order for him to say, "I don't love you."
You could've just said this to your friend directly...
@@infinitry2820 that's not how we work ;)
@@melomanyyy ..........Right......
Plipping Heck! This s Piano Magin!
fantastic👏⤴️⤴️ 美しく極めて完成度が高過ぎる(^o^)v👏
Bravoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
The sound quality seems to be too good to be true, isn't it?
It is a modern recording. A machine is playing. No living person is playing the piano. It is a sophisticated player piano using piano-rolls made by Rachmaninoff much earlier. For what it is, the result is pretty impressive, but still nowhere near as interesting as Rachmaninoff's actual sound recordings. It is dismaying to me how few people seem to understand what they are listening to here. The process is clearly described in the CD liner notes. Someone gave me this CD years ago, and I only listened to it once.
Who can say that Rachmaninov isn't one of the greatest pianist ever?
Only an ignorant idiot can say that
Спасибо за этот вальс Крейслера, в исполнении С.В. Рахманинова !!! Обожаю Рахманинова !!! ВЕЛИКИЙ РУССКИЙ КОМПОЗИТОР, ПИАНИСТ !!!!
thats sick
Che grande pianista che era rachmaninov, aveva tutto
A minor in it's full beauty
one of my favourite keys
Interesting way of putting it XD
Thanks god...
Is this Rachmaninoff's performance ??? I don't think so...
Why not
@@Gabriel-jx4or It's a high quality sound recording so...🤷🏻♂️
@@rachppianinoff8604 this is Rachmaninoff its a piano roll
0:43 1:22
Man how does it work? Is this really Rachmaninoff? Do people have to play this piece how we ear in this video to play it how Rachmaninoff did?
I mean,CAN YOU ASSURE THAT I’M LISTENING TO RACHMANINOFF’S LIEBESLEID?(😂)
It's an "Ampico" piano roll . What you hear is a recent reading of that roll .
It's remarkable, isn't it? The Ampico reproducing piano company convinced Rachmaninoff to try their system; his reaction: "Gentlemen, you have provided a gift! My playing!" Anyway, the reproducing piano mechanism replicated Rachmaninoff's playing of the keys and pedal, and in this recording a 9' grand piano was fitted with the mechanism. My reaction is much like yours: as if the ghost of Rachmaninoff himself was playing. 'A window in time' indeed!
@@WBensburg I am stunned and amazed.
Amo como suena, es precioso y trae muchos sentimientos
Other than that Rachmaninoff obviously played this on a different instrument, were they even able to accurately capture the sustain pedal on piano rolls?
Is this really Rachmaninoff? It sounds too good. Also it doesn't really sound like another recording of this piece done by him, very different interpretation.
He did a second piano roll performance, the original you heard was actually recorded in a performance hall while this is a piano roll that he played, then placed to a modern piano
Старый вальсок...из к/ф Женщины проскальзывает -мелодия
Вячеслав Грязнов?Уж очень все"на блюдечке".Даже если и так,хорошо играет:)))
This is not Rach playing. It is Charles Rosen.
Rubbish
R u stupid?
It’s a piano roll , so this is Rachmaninoff
This could never be from Rachmaninoff. It`s to clear for a recording from earlier than 1943.
For real now?
@@currybanana6237 Yes it is. Did you ever heard other recordings of this time? Then you should know what I mean.
@@psoldoy9847 you're right.
@@Classical_Masterpieces interesting.
czcams.com/video/gRO8EcvTl4c/video.html
I think you can understand a bit more why this is high quality in the linked vid. I know nothing about recording technology or anything related to it, but i believe that there's a way to remove the rain like sounds
I came here because of your lie in april anime. Anyone here does too??
No matter what you came here for, it doesn't matter- what really matters is that we are listening to this masterpiece.
@@whydoieven1400 I know, I'm just checking if more people are interested in this piece because of it
my man XD
I find it endearing that many people have started to listen to classical music due to your lie in April ( it was the opposite for me I watched it because I like classical music I’d give it a 10/10 beautiful show)
정갈하고 기품있네
화려한 장식들은 거들뿐~