St Luke the Surgeon on EVOLUTION
Vložit
- čas přidán 20. 02. 2024
- Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @holyresurrectionofchrist
www.buymeacoffee.com/holyresu...
/ prezviteros
Hiero-confessor Luke Archbishop of Simferopol, Наука и религија [Science and Religion], Троитское слово [Trinity word] 2001, pp. 41-42.
Thank you, Saint Luke for being beside me during my surgery a few years ago. He left his mark on my abdomen.
St. Luke the Surgeon, pray to God for us!
Amin!
He was really smart , thanks you for teaching us about him
Χριστόσ Ανέστη
*Even Saints make mistakes. 😇*
@@StellaMontenegro no he was completely right and evolution in no way is compatible with orthodoxy nor even the heretical heterodox
@@StellaMontenegro Have you stopped to consider that it's far more likely you have made a mistake?
@@DoomerDoxy *You couldn't be more wrong, whether you like it or not. Even Saints make mistakes. Such a fanatical and zealous mindset is so delusional and ignorant about evolutionary science, to say the least! SMH 😂 **#brainwashed*
@@Eli_Clark *Not speaking on my behalf. I didn't invent evolution and Science, bro'. There are numerous and substantial facts and evidence that supports it wholeheartedly, whether you disagree with it or not. Ignorance truly is bliss... Ugh. 🤦🏼♀️*
Thank you. Dear ST. LUKE, Physician, priest, and martyr, (as someone who was tortured for the faith, if not out-right murdered), pray for God for us! ☦
As i read through the comments below, including those which one would expect in one form or another, i found myself seriously contemplating the 'fruits' that this theory in the world. I see none. None. Just confusion, arrogance, rebellion, the opportunity to 'ditch' God, the Holy Trinity, the Creator , the loving, good,Creator for each of us.
I know there are well-written and well-meaning comments below here which delve into science in a way that i cannot, but, whatever they do say, i, at the moment, only want to look at 'fruits'. WHATEVER this theory says or doesn't say is of almost no importance in the 'details' of it. It's effectively opened the door to discard God. I remember the old, old comment that the 'world leapt at Darwin..'
Umm i am sorry to ell you none of that arises out of a biological theory that just you spewing nonesense
@@miguelatkinsonhow do you figure? If it’s as simple as you make it sound, surely you could enlighten us with your “superior” intellect and facts?
@@user-ux7uw2ej8dlearn about it yourself alot of what you guys are saying is uninformed and ignorant nonesense about the topic
@@miguelatkinson that’s not how it works. If it’s as easy to explain away as you make it sound, it would benefit everyone (including yourself) to do so. When I observe the world, it is very obvious a single monotheistic, all-powerful God created the universe. The more science I encounter, the more true it is.
St Luke the surgeon pray to God for us! 🙏☦️❤️
ST. LUKE , pray to God for us!, especially now as we think and write about this topic.
In my case, i am focusing on the 'fruits' of sadness and confusion that have been produced by it..
Darwin was well-known to the communists. How many deaths at their hands can be traced to this GOD-as- CREATOR-deleting theory? Theories have consequences..
Beautiful work by Saint Luke..☦☦
🙏🏻☦️
Thanks for doing a video on St Luke
Amazing videos. The timing is perfect.
Evolution is cringe.
NOOO!!!!! YOU HAVE TO ACCEPT THAT YOU ARE JUST A MONKE!!!!!!! STOP BEING AN IGNORANT CULTIST!!!!!!!!!!!!😭😭😭😭😭😭
*Nope. Ignorance and delusions are cringe. Even Saints can be wrong. Go figure! 🤷🏼♀️*
@@StellaMontenegro Are you saying evolution is true and it is ignorant and cringe to deny it? I don't want to debate you, so this question is sincere: do you think it is possible for someone to have an informed and rational reason to doubt it? I used to think some form of it was broadly true and only came to doubt it because of the evidence. But I am open to changing my mind again, in spite of my first comment. The only issue I have had is that I have looked for years now and I cannot find a single person, even those most aggressively defending the theory, who can explain how it could reasonably work when I question them.
@@StellaMontenegroHoly Orthodox Church is only real Truth!
@@vasilijevukcimesa87 *"To each their own" infallible 'Truth', brate.*
Although it received a major surge from life until now, it is also becoming even more obsolete within the realm of science as we learn more about genetics. If it wasn't for career long "evolutionary" biologists not being able to accept their life's work was wasted on a wrong theory, at the least, macroevolution would be untenable. However, on the earliest, it tends to take a generation or two of teachers before current science findings make it into the school systems. Unfortunately though, it has seen a rise within Christianity in the form of "guided evolution".
How DARE you disrespect SOYENCE!!!!!! We iz all MONKE!!!!!!!!!!!
Stop stirring your passions of hatred and wrath
@@kirkeww Forgive me if there was any confusion, my comment was intended as a joke.
@@tradorthobrodyermanduginpageau every good joke has an element of truth.. well done. In our world God can be marginalized, minimized, insulted.. (i can think of more serious words than those), but science can't be..
By their fruits we will know them.. i am contemplating as never before the fruits of this theory. Too putrid to list. Including the delight in despising those who disagree with it because of how it robs the true, true believers of a faith in a loving Creator Who cares for them every second.
@@lindaphillips4646 Thank you for those words. Yes indeed, it is sad that evolution is accepted as an unquestionable truth, when, in reality, there is much merit to be found in questioning it. The fruits of believing in evolution so absolutely truly are horrific - nihilism, materialism, and other lies of the sort, which lead man into unrepentant sin.
@@tradorthobrodyermanduginpageau i only now have a chance to answer you. Yes, a very good reply...especially about 'unrepentant sin'. Thank you for your comments about the evil fruit that this theory has born.
I am grateful that i had that idea.i may have read it somewhere at some time, but i was happy to have thought of it that morning
Later that day i saw that Holy Resurrection had posted a video about St. Paisios and that theory, and, how, as a young man/boy, he had been terribly troubled by the idea that therefore Jesus was not God, and how the Lord graciously answered him (for his sake and ours.).
Saw that you had posted there as well, but i didn't say anything
Had said more than enough by then.
I have a question for everyone: if you were proven wrong about the development and origin of man, life, and the cosmos, would that affect your faith? If so, why? This is both for creationists and evolutionists.
Personally no it wouldn't affect me for i have felt God many times in prayer and was helped from many situations by my guardian angel who is sent by God. And the Bible and the lives of the saints have said so many true things i mean i look at today's society and think about some saints quotes or bible verses and think how true they are . Science tries to disprove God but true scientists see when they get far that it is impossible to have a universe without God. And Jesus proved many times in the Bible (wich i am a hundred percent certain that is true and i know it) that he is God. So whatever they do i will not lose my faith in Jesus for Jesus is all i have. God bless, you sorry but my english is not very good.
Probably yes, but I don't assume this will work.
Our faith states that we can never trully grasp the mystery of God. I imagine for some they'll be very shook, but that's their personal pride breaking. Either evolution or creationism God proceeds all. Nothing would change imo
The Orthodox faith is that we experience God's energies but do not know His essence, so there are many mysteries about God that we will likely never know. I have my own theories about The Bible, Jesus etc but I keep them to myself.
Idk I just believe the Orthodox Church and its interpretation on the Bible which states a form of creationism. You can read Fr Seraphim Rose on orthodoxy and the truth of creationism
READ THE HOLY FIRE.(SKARLAKIDIS).IS GOING TO CHANGE YOUR LIFE. HIS PART OF IT.
That's not what what we claim evoltuion to be. I would suppose you at least believe in microevolution, yes? And in small adaption/s, right? Well, believe it or not, evolutionists claim, that a species doesn't just "turn into another" or "a dog gives borth to a non-dog", but rather that one species slowly changes thorugh small and few adaptations, as the environment too, changes.
An ape does not turn into a human...not into a 1.000.000 years. Is actually a mockery to even say this
@@mihaisorinneacsu7539 Did you even try to read what I said?
@@Orthosaur7532 somehow i think i have but explain this please: " but rather that one species slowly changes thorugh small and few adaptations, as the environment too, changes.". I mean i can understand if somehow some fish or smth can in time to change a bit or like we did with dogs......but from a monkey to a human? Never
Evolution is a miracle guided by God's hand to perfectly create the clay of humans
@@davisdietzen Yes!
Evolution is completely compatible with the Christian worldview. The idea that it isn't comes from a misunderstanding of both evolution and Genesis
You're lying.
Do not blaspheme! Holy Orthodox Church is only real Truth!
*Like it or not, Evolution is not merely a hypothesis nor theory anymore, but rather a proven scientific fact! The problem is that evolution proves that the Genesis narrative is purely fiction or an "allegory" at best, which leaves many devout believers in distress towards Divinity, as evident in the animosity towards Darwinism et al. in the comments. Cognitive dissonance is bliss... 🤷🏼♀️*
The evidence that supposedly proves evolution only does so because it is interpreted according to a materialistic and nihilistic narrative. If one accepts the transcendent narrative of Christianity, then the fossils and genetics used as evidence gain new meaning. Look up "Jonathan Pageau." His ideas are essential to understanding this.
i havent come across anything that would prove evolution yet but if you want to you can share the evidence youve found
I am a young Biochemist, with just a Bachelor's and Master's degree (not a doctor's degree yet), and an Orthodox Christian (formerly atheist).
I do think the theory of evolution is mostly correct, but the theory of old earth has some significant errors.
The theory regarding the genetic relations of the species, and the past existence of extinct species, is backed up by a lot of evidence, and the methods through which this evidence was gathered is very solid. We can observe randomly (through a copying error) or environmentally caused mutations during DNA replication, that can give rise to new properties in an organism. When it comes to explaining the Garden of Eden without ignoring the evidence for evolution, I think that the Garden existed before the evolution of humans, and Adam and Eve where thrown in our history after their first sin. After all, there were already humans living in cities when Cain (the child of Adam and Eve) killed Abel. If you think this is a coping mechanism, because I don't want to discard my faith, I can give you some good reasons as to why I have my faith, and maybe you could consider them if you ever search for God.
Now, unlike the theory of evolution, the theories regarding the Earth being billions of years old, are not as strongly supported by evidence.
One reason being, that the main method we use to determine the age of the Earth is radioactive dating. This method focuses on measuring radioactive decay, where unstable isotopes decay into stable isotopes at known rates. By measuring the ratio of parent isotopes to daughter isotopes in a sample, scientists can calculate how long it has been since the mineral or rock formed. The data in these experiements is extrapolated based on the current known rates of decay for radioactive particles.
However, numerous studies on radioactive decay have shown that the rates of decay can change due to environmental conditions (for example “Reduced radioactivity of tritium in small titanium particles,” Phys Lett A184:149-153, 1994), and are not stable.
This means that the method above is not as valid as many people would think, because it assumes a stable rate of radioactive decay that has only observed only in the last century. In the end, the extrapolation covers more than 10,000,000 times the range over which the data have been measured! Therefore we can't be so certain about the age of the Earth based solely on radioactive dating. There are some less-often used methods though, that are sometimes more credible, but still have their problems.
orthochristian.com/155816.html
Impossibility to be proven scientific fact as it's not observable nor reproducible.