Coulomb's Law (7 of 7) Force on Three Charges Arranged in a Right Triangle

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 14. 04. 2016
  • How to use Coulomb's law to calculate the net force on one charge from two other charges arranged in a right triangle. Coulomb's law states that the magnitude of the force between two point charges is directly proportional to the product of the magnitudes of charges and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. If the sign of the charges is the same, both positive or both negative, then there will be a force of repulsion between the charges. If they have the opposite sign then there will be a force of attraction between the objects. The force is along the straight line joining the two charges. The SI unit for the force is the newton.
    The force between the charged bodies at rest is commonly known as the electrostatic force. Coulomb's law is an inverse-square law and is similar to Isaac Newton's inverse-square law of universal gravitation, but gravitational forces are always attractive, while electrostatic forces can be attractive or repulsive.
    The law is named after the French physicist Charles-Augustin de Coulomb who first discovered it in 1785. The SI unit for electric charge was named after him.
    This video can be shared at: • Coulomb's Law (7 of 7)...

Komentáře • 234

  • @mengis2012
    @mengis2012 Před 7 lety +45

    well clear and easy to understand with a short time. Thanks for your effort.

    • @StudiesinPhysics
      @StudiesinPhysics Před 6 lety

      #studiesinphysics

    • @theokieran5353
      @theokieran5353 Před 2 lety

      you prolly dont give a damn but does someone know of a method to get back into an Instagram account..?
      I was stupid lost my account password. I would love any tricks you can offer me!

    • @dukedominick7005
      @dukedominick7005 Před 2 lety

      @Theo Kieran instablaster =)

    • @theokieran5353
      @theokieran5353 Před 2 lety

      @Duke Dominick Thanks for your reply. I found the site through google and Im trying it out now.
      Seems to take quite some time so I will reply here later with my results.

    • @theokieran5353
      @theokieran5353 Před 2 lety

      @Duke Dominick It did the trick and I actually got access to my account again. I'm so happy!
      Thanks so much, you saved my account :D

  • @fredogj5616
    @fredogj5616 Před 3 lety +6

    Life savior. I spent so much time watching useless videos before i came across this gem. Thank you for your very good and clear explanation.

  • @ceciliasimon2039
    @ceciliasimon2039 Před 4 lety +8

    Thank you so much! I have been scrambling before my first Physics 2 midterm this week. my professor would not do any examples of these so this was a lifesaver!

    • @stepbystepscience
      @stepbystepscience  Před 4 lety +1

      Hope the mid term goes well, thanks for watching and commenting.

  • @Saltwaster
    @Saltwaster Před 11 měsíci +3

    You clarified so many steps for me in a logical manner. Thank you!!

  • @atempazuleima
    @atempazuleima Před 6 lety +2

    GREAT VIDEO!
    Helpful and straight to the point!

  • @ArturoGarciaMX
    @ArturoGarciaMX Před 4 lety +1

    I use your video to show my daughter how to resolve this kind of problems. You make my day! Thanks!

    • @stepbystepscience
      @stepbystepscience  Před 4 lety +1

      Wonderful! Thank for the comment and thanks for helping your daughter. Parental involvement is very important.

  • @cynthireyla6058
    @cynthireyla6058 Před 6 lety +1

    Subscribed man! This is the clearest video i've watched of this topic you saved me from failure!! Thank you

    • @stepbystepscience
      @stepbystepscience  Před 6 lety

      Great and thank you for subscribing. You can see a listing of al my videos at www.stepbystepscience.com

  • @jonnyramirez4626
    @jonnyramirez4626 Před 3 lety +2

    Thank you so much for this easy to follow break down!

  • @ashasinanan9883
    @ashasinanan9883 Před 6 lety +2

    This was great thank you so much!

  • @danielleik4490
    @danielleik4490 Před 4 lety +8

    I'm so so thankful you give multiple examples for different topics. Khan Academy only does the simplest sample and I'm left stumped on my homework. Watching your channel has basically saved my AP Physics grade. Thank you!

    • @stepbystepscience
      @stepbystepscience  Před 4 lety

      Wonderful! Thanks for watching and commenting. Hope AP goes well.

  • @stephaniemoreno3333
    @stephaniemoreno3333 Před 2 lety +4

    Man have I been struggling with this concept and you just simplified it so well! Thank you sooo much for your videos. I also want to add that I really like that you keep your videos as a series of short videos rather than a long one to focus one concept at a time. Super helpful! :)

    • @stepbystepscience
      @stepbystepscience  Před 2 lety

      Glad to hear the videos have been helpful! Thanks for your comment.

  • @exoplanet11
    @exoplanet11 Před 3 lety

    Thanks for this informative video. I have recommended that my physics students watch it.

  • @matjepengoasheng4896
    @matjepengoasheng4896 Před 5 lety +4

    This was super helpful thank you so much!

  • @emilycosta9724
    @emilycosta9724 Před rokem +2

    This was so clear and I understood it well, thank you!

  • @diamandis07
    @diamandis07 Před 6 lety +1

    Thank youuu! You the real MVP :)

  • @circularityspace
    @circularityspace Před 7 lety

    Very helpful. God bless you

  • @danaashliecosino8881
    @danaashliecosino8881 Před 3 lety +6

    This was so helpful. The explanation and the visual representations are clear. Thank you!

  • @MAM-ze2uy
    @MAM-ze2uy Před 2 lety +1

    This is so so helpful. Thank you so much!

  • @unconventionalgriffin6957
    @unconventionalgriffin6957 Před měsícem +1

    Dude, I have my physics final tomorrow and this is a lifesaver. Thank you!!!!!

  • @stevencool9657
    @stevencool9657 Před 2 lety +2

    you helped me through out this series thank you

  • @gdragon1268
    @gdragon1268 Před 6 lety +1

    thank you! so simple and easy to understand :)

  • @tharchainnimogan6347
    @tharchainnimogan6347 Před 4 lety

    Thanks alot..... Very clear explanation. Really helpful.

  • @turbothrottletrouble4217
    @turbothrottletrouble4217 Před 4 lety +1

    your videos are helping me with my problem solving skills for physics needed for IB, thank you so much!!!!!

    • @stepbystepscience
      @stepbystepscience  Před 4 lety

      Great to hear and thanks for letting me know.

    • @bastefren8281
      @bastefren8281 Před 4 lety

      @@stepbystepscience where can I find more similar examples

  • @fakingtrels
    @fakingtrels Před 8 lety

    Neat. I remember using this in chemistry but we never went too in depth in it.

    • @stepbystepscience
      @stepbystepscience  Před 8 lety

      +fakingtrels Great, thanks for comenting.
      You can see a listing of all my videos at my website, www.stepbystepscience.com

  • @Nioco2
    @Nioco2 Před 7 lety +3

    Wow, you explained that so easily. I really did overthink it.

    • @stepbystepscience
      @stepbystepscience  Před 7 lety +2

      Keep it simple. You can a listing of all my videos from my website at www.stepbystepscience.com

  • @aceofdrace
    @aceofdrace Před 7 lety +3

    Great lesson step by step!

    • @stepbystepscience
      @stepbystepscience  Před 7 lety

      Yes I try to go over everything step by step, thanks for the comment. You can see a listing of all my videos at my website, www.stepbystepscience.com

  • @wahidhamidy6886
    @wahidhamidy6886 Před 7 lety +4

    thanks man!
    great job!

  • @P1aceHo1derName
    @P1aceHo1derName Před 2 lety +1

    Thank you for the video, I have a question if I broke the first half of the problem into their X and Y components so F31y+F32y and F32x and then did Pythagoreans theorem I would end up with the same answer right?

  • @tofufu7878
    @tofufu7878 Před 4 lety +1

    thank you! this helped me in my homework

  • @jstroner
    @jstroner Před 4 lety +1

    Yours vids are great. Ty

  • @currentlysleeping9061
    @currentlysleeping9061 Před 2 lety +1

    Thank you very much for the explanation. I really needed to understand it.. Thank you

  • @florianshkurta1557
    @florianshkurta1557 Před 2 lety +1

    Thank you so much. Short time so much to learn.

  • @nonichan8829
    @nonichan8829 Před 6 lety +1

    I did subscribe its a life savior

  • @linanouman9545
    @linanouman9545 Před 2 lety +2

    Thank you for a very clear explanation

  • @popopolalala3101
    @popopolalala3101 Před 5 lety +1

    Thank you, so much better than my TAs

  • @sharbelrached1703
    @sharbelrached1703 Před 3 lety +1

    super easy to follow, helped a ton.

  • @dr.priyadeshmukh-taskar5920

    Thanks for this informational video. Very systematic. I had one problem regarding the component vector addition. Isn't change in vector x associated with cosine value and change in vector y associated with sine value?

  • @eltonsaraci5418
    @eltonsaraci5418 Před 8 lety +1

    Hello mr Swarthout . I just wanna thank you for sharing these lessons with us . I was also interested in knowing which software or programme are you using to write and record them . I'm doing the same thing with my students in Albania , but i've recorded videos with my phone only . Wished you could help me :)

    • @stepbystepscience
      @stepbystepscience  Před 8 lety +1

      Hello from Berlin Germany, I have always wanted to visit Albania. You are ver welcome and thanks for commenting. My vidoes are made very low budget. I have a MacBook Pro and all of the presenations are made with Keynote. Then I just recoed with QuickTime, nothing more. In the past I have used a progam called ScreenFlow which can be used to record what is on your computer as well as from your built in camera.

    • @eltonsaraci5418
      @eltonsaraci5418 Před 8 lety

      That's great ! I really like your videos ; simplicity and the way how you share your knowledge are my favourite elements . Lol , really ? You would be quite welcomed if you came here ! If you really are thinking about it , don't forget to call me too . I'd be very pleased if i met you .

  • @bengardner2481
    @bengardner2481 Před 2 lety +1

    Thanks, this is really helpful.

  • @hugochavez5356
    @hugochavez5356 Před 7 lety +1

    how would you do it if you need to find the magnitude and the direction on q2(75 microcoulomb) and lets just say that the distance between q1 and q2 have not been given.....please help

  • @Subhanarif268
    @Subhanarif268 Před rokem +1

    Thank tou very much
    The way you explain step by step is amazing
    I have enjoyed in doing that
    Thanks

  • @kiraunderwood9505
    @kiraunderwood9505 Před 5 lety +18

    the F31 is poitung downwards so it is the one that should be negative not the F32y

  • @Aimenxo
    @Aimenxo Před 3 lety +5

    I hope you still read comments on this video. Thank you sir for all the amazing videos that illustrates questions.
    Sir, I'm only confused why you didn't consider the Fx as negative? it was on the negative direction
    2nd.. Why you didn't make the sign of Fy negative when you counted all the forces in Y direction?
    Were you only taking the magnitude of forces ??

    • @stepbystepscience
      @stepbystepscience  Před 3 lety +3

      I still try to respond to all my comments. Yes, when using the equation you are finding the magnitude of the forces and in the end I gave the magnitude of the resultant force and because force is a vector quantity I also gave the direction of the force in degrees from the x axis.
      But it is a good point, I suppose for the component forces I could also have put a minus sign in front of the answers, but then again I did also show their direction on the coordinate system.
      And thanks for the positive comment.

  • @iiStayFlyx5
    @iiStayFlyx5 Před 2 lety

    hello, I'm having trouble figuring out when to use sin and cos when solving for f32 (5:03) you use sin and not cos why

  • @cxsxnxvx
    @cxsxnxvx Před 8 měsíci +1

    i love you, thank you soooo much dude

  • @neknek669
    @neknek669 Před 4 lety

    What if the distances aren't given? I have a similar homework problem but neither one distance between any two charges on a 90-degree angle plane does not have a distance?

  • @TBC1599
    @TBC1599 Před 2 lety

    Why can't you use the cosine rule with the angle between F32 and F31 as 120°? is there something I'm not understanding about net forces?

  • @topperssecretsolution6719
    @topperssecretsolution6719 Před 4 měsíci +1

    Thank u so much
    Wonderful explanation
    Cleared my all doubts

  • @dragon123456650
    @dragon123456650 Před 5 lety

    Thank you very much that really helped a lot

  • @chinzeene3947
    @chinzeene3947 Před 7 měsíci +1

    Bless you

  • @MuhammadFarhan-sf2fp
    @MuhammadFarhan-sf2fp Před 2 lety +1

    Thanks man, helped a lot

  • @richardferre1253
    @richardferre1253 Před 2 lety

    why did we have to find the angle again at 7:39, since we already had it as 60?

  • @Natalie82M
    @Natalie82M Před 8 měsíci +1

    Thank u so much sir ❤
    U made this soo easy😭

  • @PeterMek-oe8oj
    @PeterMek-oe8oj Před 8 měsíci +1

    Thankyou very and understandable....

  • @delsna
    @delsna Před 3 lety

    In the question, there were no angles given, where did you get the angles from

  • @malakabuhashish
    @malakabuhashish Před 2 lety +1

    THANK YOU!!

  • @basketballtutorials7828

    Why did u put Fx and Fy in the negative direction though they are positive

  • @elly1175
    @elly1175 Před 4 lety

    hi i'm not good at trigo can i ask how did you determine that the triangle is a 30-60-90 triangle? thanks :

  • @ritajabal
    @ritajabal Před 8 měsíci +2

    Thank u so much! Got an exam tomorrow so hopefully I’ll ace it ❤️

  • @kydeverendia2962
    @kydeverendia2962 Před 4 lety

    Why dis you add 180 to the angle? Arent you suppose to minus it? Im confused

  • @drexraptor
    @drexraptor Před 4 měsíci

    How do you assume the angle of the F32??😊

  • @kirilblazevski8329
    @kirilblazevski8329 Před 8 lety

    Dear Mr. Brian! Do you have a video about "diopter"? I've seen your video about farsightedness and nearsightedness, but i can't find anything about diopter. Sorry for this non - related question.
    Btw your videos are awesome, and you are really really great teacher!

    • @stepbystepscience
      @stepbystepscience  Před 8 lety

      +Kiril Blazevski Sorry but I do not, but thanks for the positive comment.
      You can see a listing of all my videos at my website, www.stepbystepscience.com

    • @kirilblazevski8329
      @kirilblazevski8329 Před 8 lety

      Thank you anyways!

  • @josephdavidson3608
    @josephdavidson3608 Před 3 lety +1

    Thank you so much

  • @mohammadtameem7197
    @mohammadtameem7197 Před rokem +1

    Indeed it's awesome explanation 👌

  • @Beasht12
    @Beasht12 Před 6 lety +4

    Life saver, didn't really go to class much and midterm tomorrow:)

  • @molokoanebareng2959
    @molokoanebareng2959 Před 7 lety

    made my day

  • @Jason-tj7xw
    @Jason-tj7xw Před 6 lety +2

    i don't understand how you got 214 and 80 N my standard form isn't so great, I've tried calculating it with a calculator but it's not giving me the same values..... it'd be of great help if you could give a detailed explanation

  • @IbrahimKalil-oi2eg
    @IbrahimKalil-oi2eg Před měsícem +1

    Your explanation is very good. But you have an error in the place you put theta. Theta should be placed above the negative x-axis according to the prolem.

  • @zarahkristinalumba1213
    @zarahkristinalumba1213 Před 3 lety +1

    hello may I ask where did you get the angle 68 degrees??

    • @stepbystepscience
      @stepbystepscience  Před 3 lety

      You are looking for the angle that has a target of 2.52. On your calculator you probably have to push the shift tan key to get tan-1 2.52 = 68 degrees. does that help?

  • @williamsyelyah2928
    @williamsyelyah2928 Před 4 lety +1

    This helped me answer my homework! Thanks 😂

  • @Grind03
    @Grind03 Před 2 lety +1

    Thanks, you saved me hours of headache

  • @themvlek
    @themvlek Před rokem +1

    Thank you sir

  • @doomer1968
    @doomer1968 Před 2 lety

    The magnitude of the total force acting on q1 is 249 Newtons. but you need to find the charge of Q1?

  • @mariellacandido2966
    @mariellacandido2966 Před 5 lety

    thankyouuu

  • @oscaremmanuelcisnerosdiaz8929
    @oscaremmanuelcisnerosdiaz8929 Před 2 měsíci +1

    thanks

  • @vincentsdailyvlogs7408
    @vincentsdailyvlogs7408 Před 6 lety +3

    Your direction for q3 on q1 should be opposite because the magnitude of attraction is greater on q3 when you disregard the signs.

    • @stepbystepscience
      @stepbystepscience  Před 6 lety

      Not sure I understand your comment, but I did everything correct....of course.

    • @rajab4187
      @rajab4187 Před 5 lety

      @@stepbystepscience whattttt

  • @simozy4475
    @simozy4475 Před 8 měsíci +1

    Great video

  • @Warwaffles99
    @Warwaffles99 Před 7 lety +1

    You, sir, saved my ass. Thank you.

  • @jovanmagtoto1682
    @jovanmagtoto1682 Před 3 lety +1

    thank you for this sir. New friend here

  • @emmanuelancheta2887
    @emmanuelancheta2887 Před rokem

    how to get the 68 degre

  • @victoremmanuel9189
    @victoremmanuel9189 Před 10 měsíci +1

    🙏 for the lesson, but why did u use sin in resolving for x-axis and cos for y a-axis then the degree I use 180 + your angle 68 which is = to 248 instead of 180-68🤔

    • @stepbystepscience
      @stepbystepscience  Před 10 měsíci

      I used the sine because the we went to get the x component which is the opposite side and sine is opposite over the hypothenuse and the I used the cosine because we want to get the y component which is the adjacent side and cosine is the adjacent side over the hypothenuse.
      And I used 68 plus 180 to get the angle. Does that answer your question?

  • @MENTOR12
    @MENTOR12 Před rokem +1

    Why using cosine to get the y component instead of sine

  • @samuelmichael914
    @samuelmichael914 Před 6 lety +1

    How did you get the 60° at 4:02?

    • @stepbystepscience
      @stepbystepscience  Před 6 lety +1

      The triangle is a 30 60 90 triangle, the 60 is at the upper left, that means for the second part the opposite angle is also 60 degrees.

    • @samuelmichael914
      @samuelmichael914 Před 6 lety

      Step-by-Step Science Ohh thanks! I understand now, thank you so much!

    • @jppj3877
      @jppj3877 Před 6 lety

      I was about to ask the same question. Thanks though

    • @altuber99_athlete
      @altuber99_athlete Před 6 lety

      Due to a property of angles named _vertical angles_ or _opposite angles_ or _vertically opposite angles._

    • @elly1175
      @elly1175 Před 4 lety

      @@stepbystepscience hi i'm not good at trigo can i ask how did you determine that the triangle is a 30-60-90 triangle? thanks :

  • @lorrainekiruhia3842
    @lorrainekiruhia3842 Před 2 lety

    Hello sir, I'm still confuse with why you used sine to find the x-component of F31 and cosine to find the y-component of F31. Could you pls help me out?

    • @stepbystepscience
      @stepbystepscience  Před 2 lety +1

      sine is for the opposite side of the right triangle, cosine is for the adjacent side

    • @lorrainekiruhia3842
      @lorrainekiruhia3842 Před 2 lety

      @@stepbystepscience alright..thanks very much

  • @virtuality400
    @virtuality400 Před 2 měsíci +1

    shouldn’t it supposed to towards q3 from q1.From minus towards plus

    • @stepbystepscience
      @stepbystepscience  Před 2 měsíci

      If I understand your question....the force on q3 from q1 is down. They are opposite charges so they attract each other. q1 pulls q3 down. Does that help?

    • @stepbystepscience
      @stepbystepscience  Před 2 měsíci

      If I understand you question....the force on q3 from q1 is down. The are opposite charges and they attract each other, than means q1 pulls q3 down. Does that help?

  • @cillian2515
    @cillian2515 Před 8 měsíci +1

    How do u determine the angles? How do u know if it’s 30 or 60 degreesss help ur girl out

    • @stepbystepscience
      @stepbystepscience  Před 8 měsíci

      In this case you know it is this type of triangle because I told you in the video. But if you know the lengths of the sides or have other information about the triangle then you can calculate the angles.

  • @user-id8of8sv1f
    @user-id8of8sv1f Před 9 měsíci +1

    Please, l have question why The angle (60) with y - axis, I Think it with x - axis

    • @stepbystepscience
      @stepbystepscience  Před 9 měsíci

      it is a 30, 60 ,90 triangle. 30 degrees with the x-axis and 90 degrees with the y-axis.

    • @user-id8of8sv1f
      @user-id8of8sv1f Před 9 měsíci

      !! Nice, Thank you

  • @rahman1314
    @rahman1314 Před 4 lety +1

    hi what to do if q3 is - ve

  • @vincentaguila9393
    @vincentaguila9393 Před 7 lety

    What if there's no angles given but it's still in a right angle?

  • @jordansreepath4953
    @jordansreepath4953 Před 2 lety +1

    You're the reason my class is passing physics 😭

  • @prantarneilsheenap.1671
    @prantarneilsheenap.1671 Před 3 lety +1

    What is the net force?

  • @MAM-ze2uy
    @MAM-ze2uy Před 3 lety +2

    🙌🏽

  • @johnlevison1139
    @johnlevison1139 Před rokem +1

    Impressive

  • @rodaneabapo4498
    @rodaneabapo4498 Před 7 lety

    How did you get 248°?

    • @stepbystepscience
      @stepbystepscience  Před 7 lety +1

      Zero degrees is at the positve x axis and then is counted couter clockwise. The angle I calculated is 68 degree and that is actually 68 degrees past 180 dregrees, so 180 + 68 = 248 degrees. Does that help?

  • @user-kr4br5ro1j
    @user-kr4br5ro1j Před 5 měsíci +2

    nice video

  • @Prometeur
    @Prometeur Před 3 lety

    You made some mistakes, but overall helped me understand the concept more. Thank you!

    • @stepbystepscience
      @stepbystepscience  Před 3 lety

      What mistakes? Please elaborate.

    • @Prometeur
      @Prometeur Před 3 lety

      @@stepbystepscience I'm pretty sure the y component of the F31 should be negative, rather than the F32 y component.

    • @restitutororbis964
      @restitutororbis964 Před 9 měsíci

      @@PrometeurYeah the problem clearly states the forces influenced upon Q3. The vector he uses expresses the force of Q3 on Q1.. not the other way around which is what the problem is asking. Otherwise it’s good.

  • @user-vb1lg3uu6m
    @user-vb1lg3uu6m Před 17 dny +1

    tk!

  • @onyiturner5345
    @onyiturner5345 Před rokem +1

    AMAZINGGGGGGG

  • @itsashepubg8967
    @itsashepubg8967 Před 5 lety +1

    For the total of Fy..why minus? Not plus? Hehe please answer

    • @stepbystepscience
      @stepbystepscience  Před 5 lety

      Because it is pointing in the opposite direction?

    • @datboyandrei
      @datboyandrei Před 5 lety

      @@stepbystepscience wait but it's going down, shouldnt it be 40N - 214N im confused

    • @simranc7690
      @simranc7690 Před 5 lety +1

      @@datboyandrei You end up with the exact same value that (when it's squared later on in Pythagorean) turns positive anyway. You can do it either way you want since you'll get the same answer :) hope that helped

  • @NoorNoor-pf5id
    @NoorNoor-pf5id Před 8 měsíci

    how come you are using sin for X and cos for Y

    • @simozy4475
      @simozy4475 Před 8 měsíci +1

      Because one of the basic trig functions says: sin(θ)=Opp/Hyp, So: Opp=sin(θ)*Hyp
      while Cos(θ)=Adj/Hyp, meaning: Adj=cos(θ)*Hyp

    • @stepbystepscience
      @stepbystepscience  Před 8 měsíci

      Thank you.