Poilievre won't read NSICOP report. Mulcair explains why
Vložit
- čas přidán 12. 06. 2024
- Former NDP leader Tom Mulcair thinks Pierre Poilievre is making the right choice by not reading the NSICOP report on foreign meddling.
Subscribe to CTV News to watch more videos: / ctvnews
Connect with CTV News:
For live updates and latest headlines visit: www.ctvnews.ca/
For breaking news, fast, download the CTV News App: www.ctvnews.ca/app
Must-watch stories and full programs at www.ctvnews.ca/video
CTV News on TikTok: www.tiktok.com/discover/CTV-News
CTV News on X (formerly Twitter): / ctvnews
CTV News on Reddit: / ctvnews
CTV News on LinkedIn: / ctv-news
---
CTV News is Canada's most-watched news organization both locally and nationally, and has a network of national, international, and local news operations.
To be fair, neither May nor her voters are too smart.
Only in BC, same as that nutbag Laurel Collins ,and EBY !
For her it's always 5 o'clock somewhere !
The CPC statistically has the least educated voters in the country, just sayin
@@rodneysauder1867oh yes...Collins is a real piece of work.
Neither of them.
What a respectful response from Mulcair. I’m not an NDP fan, but he really impressed with his calm wisdom. Elizabeth May however….WACKO 🙄
If she is WACKO I wonder how much further over the edge you are?
Tom needs to replace Jagmeet.
@@lornarichardson5655 Elizabeth May is a bloody lunatic!!! And as far as I'm concerned the NDP can burn in hell in its entirety ..... PP for PM
@@lornarichardson5655 As long as the NDP replaces the Conservatives or Liberals I'm for it. Voting for Libs and Cons and expecting anything but fraud is insane...
He's not NDP. he changed to the conservatives. and had ties with the conservatives / foreign countries
Kudos to Mr Mulcair for telling the truth as he sees it. Much respect 😊
Why does Mulcair speak for others? Why Can’t the leader of His Majesty’s Official Opposition speak for himself? What’s he hiding? This is very suspicious
@62Cristoforo Pierre Poilievre is smarter won't be silenced, he definitely has my vote, I love common sense, I ❤🇨🇦
@62Cristoforo If I were you ,I would be more worried why your Prime Minister hasn't said a peep, if I'm not mistaken he has seen the report,, could be lots of his cabinet members on that list...just saying...🤔
@@donnarocha4043 Wow. What's it like to be this stupid?
He wishes he was relevant.
Why is she so surprised? I thought Mulcair made it pretty clear.
She wants to be.
She is a Truedo, how obvious.
Because CTV’s buyout money mandates they never agree with anyone who opposes the radical Trudeauites.
Because it's a political decision not to read it. Not what's actually right.
@@reyd8609 liberal campaign staff in her earpiece for sure.
For anyone that still doesn’t understand why PP can’t talk about it if he reads the report after watching this video, I’m sorry you will never understand. Tom really spelled it out here
No, you're the one who doesn't understand.
Just the Liberals raging at May acting out. She's the one who blunted their attack on Pierre by making that public statement.
You'd think as a political reporter she would know this stuff, but here we are.
She puts it on for the show, most likely. Just like how a lot of reporters ask dumb questions, on behalf of the stupid viewers.
There's a reason why Frank Magazine dubbed news readers "Bingo Callers". Cheers.
No she is a propagandist .
You said it much more eloquently than I.
Same thought !
Thanks for posting !
Mulcair is completely right Poilievre should not read the report.
Which says more about Poilievre (and Mulcair, for that matter) than it says about the report.
Really, why? Do you even know what the report is about 😂
Pollievre would need to be able to read.
@@wayneessar7489- It's your buddy JT who cannot read, or do math. Pathetic.
@@bernardkung7306
Yes, it says that they aren’t going to hide anything from their party or Canadians. No gag order for them.
No one believes drunk gin lizzy
A post from another channel, someone wrote the following about Lizzy May. She saw a Drink Canada Dry sign once and took it as a challenge. lol
She's so surprised because she's a liberal mouthpiece!
Dizzy Lizzy doesn't understand what she reads!
She's kinda cute though
@@andrewgeorgelang If you're into women who are 40+
Elizabeth may is taking her 15 minutes of fame.
she read the report between the redactions which is saying she never saw any names because they were all redacted,she is still the green goblin.
Shes just happy to be noticed for a change
Running cover for the Liberals in hopes of a scrap from the table
@@robertkearns4602she’s a special stupid
@@robertkearns4602 The report she read was not redacted.
I agree with Pierre and Mulcair. It is better for him not to know and try to push for it to be released to the public. It puts him on par with the regular citizens demanding justice rather than the privileged politicians who can act in self interest and try to downplay the traitorous MPs.
...Pierre & Tom....
All the while threatening our information collecting and those who collect it. Playing politics with our national security is reckless. May read it and still talked about it. Only she was armed with facts, not speculation.
@@PaulMartin-qu5up May is not the leader of the Official Opposition, indeed she is just another liberal sycophant. She has nothing to lose by reading it and has no role in holding the government to account. As such who cares what the drunken May has to say.
@@hexhex7220 One prefers to be called Pierre in public, while Mulcair has shown preference in being called by his last name in public. To each their own.
It's hypocritical though. Polievre said he'd throw anyone who colluded with foreign agents out of the Conservative party. If he fixes it it so he never knows, his promise means nothing. Remember that Modi and his Indian agents pumped money into the Conservative Party during Poilievre's leadership campaign. If I were an honest leader, I'd want to know which Conservative party members took money from Indian agents so he could throw them out. For all we know, Poilievre himself may have taken money from Indian agents. If he doesn't take this information, it's a sign that he just wants to be able to deny knowing which of his party members are on the take and wants to keep the illegal money.
Because he wouldn't be able to tell the Canadians about it! He will be charged. They( libs) want him to read it, so they can silence him. I totally agree, He doesn't give them that chance.
Not what she wanted to hear!!!
Just weeks ago he also said Greg Fergus should resign as he was clearly biased
What can't she figure out? As the official opposition, it's Piolievre's duty to keep the presiding government in check and hold their feet to the flames when they mess up. If he's sworn to silence on this, then he's knee-capped in performing that role.
Democracy not as important for the opposition, apparently.
Your argument is actually absurd.
It doesn't make sense. You're saying that if
"Poilivere reads the report, he can't discuss it, but if he doesn't read the report he can!"
He's making the choice NOT to have security clearance.
@@usapaw5700
That is exactly what he said because the security clearance to read the report makes you unable to discuss it with anyone. He couldn’t even bring it up in the hoc.
It literally stops the leader from even being able to discuss it with any of their MPs.
@@usapaw5700 No it actually makes sense, if only you would use a little logic. You must be a Liberal supporter. Poilievre wants the information to be RELEASED... it's NOT about his ability to read or not read the report. Giving him that security clearance would effectively muzzle him in that endeavor. Even the former leader of the NDP sees this.
Thanks Tom , respect ❤
Like listening to Mulcair. He must be ashamed of the party he once led.
holy wow 98 likes now i spose alot of ppl resonate with what you said me too !
And you know this how? He said ''this one time'' when it came to agreeing with Poliviere. One time.
NDP Singh just announced he is “more disturbed” about foreign interference after reading the unredacted NSICOP report. Quite the contrast from Green’s May yesterday.
And both of them shouldn’t be talking about it.
Yes, but now if someone from his caucus happens to be on that list he cannot have the RCMP investigate and charge the guilty party, nor can he remove them from his caucus or force their resignation..just a thought but maybe that's why he chose to read the documents because now he has an excuse not to hold them to account.
He also said that he was targeted.
He wasn’t allowed to say that from my understanding of his security clearance.
Greens may as well be lndp.
@@schwags1969 The Green has always been irrelevant. (note, they aren't Greens if they only have one MP)
Get Elizabeth May drunk ,maybe she'll spill the beans 😂
Better yet don’t let her drink, she’ll tell you everything
And then they can jail her 😂
Why is it Top Secret if there is nothing in it?
Because it could implicate some Conservatives (past and present) working with Stephen Harper’s new group The International Democracy Union. The members are some of the most anti democratic governments on this planet, The Republican Party (responsible for January 6th, and their front runner is a convicted felon) Vladimir Putin’s government of Russia, Viktor Orban’s Fidiz party of Hungary (both Authoritarian) Jair Bolsonaro’s party of Brazil, and Nahrendra Modi’s BJP of India, and Benjamin Netanyahu’s party of Israel Come to think of it, If I was in Pierre Poilievre’s position I would plead ignorance, and wouldn’t want to know either
These documents usually cite their sources,
if their sources are secret, so is the document.
..... once secrecy is compromised, it cannot be used in court....wouldn't it be inadmissible? or is it still?
FBI having involvement sets off my suspicious spidey-senses.
You can see the Liberal bias all over the host's face.
Sickening.
in the words of kurdt cobain "its pretty scary "
may is way out over her skis. attention seeking individual.
She’s just protecting the liberals
TRYING TO DO DAMAGE CONTROL AND POLITICAL SWAYING FOR HER OFFICIAL LEADER
The liberals want Poilievre stifled .Poilievre scrares the hell out of Trudeau.
It's glorious!!!
That’s just stupid. You can’t talk about something you didn’t read. PP is totally sketch.
@@kalikat6153IT IS ILLEGAL FOR HIM TO TALK ABOUT IT IF HE READS IT, GENIUS
❤
I'm not a liberal & he scares the sheet out of me.
He reminds me of a shifty used car salesman.
Trudeau is an embarrassment, & JS is a spineless limp noodle.
Why would anyone pay attention to anything May says?
about the same as Mulclair
You might learn something, she’s a very smart woman and needs no endorsement from you.
@@TessTearoe-zp5xv
Not smart enough to put down the bottle.
Maybe not, but the mere fact that she spoke on what she saw in the top secret documents goes to prove that Poilievre can see the documents and speak on them too.
@wolfiedude121 she told nothing. Who was the former mp can't say. Who unwittingly helped foreign government, she couldn't say.
I have always agreed with that stance. There is only one reason for the Government to offer that to someone and that is to gain their silence.
Never trust the JT Liberals
Tell that to Elizabeth May.
Exactly
Bulltwaddle
Elizabeth May got the security clearance, saw the documents and still spoke on it... How was she silenced?
Mulcair is a true veteran politician! He has political principles unlike the current NDP Jagmeat!
I would add like PP & JT as well.
Pierre doesn't want to be gagged.
peepee makes ma gag. hes a clown
When last in gov, multi-millionaire Pierre & his conservative colleagues gagged scientists, diplomats, civil servants, scientists, and even tried to gag disabled veterans - who rightly refused to be!
@@garyhaggquist740 You could google "are scientists still gagged in Canada"
You can find "Canadian scientists are still being muzzled, and that risks undermining climate policy
Published: December 13, 2023 6.09pm EST." and other articles saying they are still gagged.
Scientists were gagged under Harper, they are gaggged under Trudeau.
@@garyhaggquist740 YUP Harpers lapdog and servant to the same rich bandits..
@@garyhaggquist740gag them for what?
My biggest concern is why did this information have to come from the FBI The question is where in hell are our RCMP or CSIS did they know was there political motives not to investigate
Its likely something to do with the 5 eye program,
there are 5 countries (actually more) that have treaties to spy on each other and share the data.
This is because these countries have laws against spying on their own citizens.
like it or hate it, its a very effective program.
They are part of the state regime if that isn't obvious to you over the last 8 yrs.
They knew, but they are partisan hacks at this point. The RCMP and likely all law enforcement in Canada is compromised.
if Americans cannot trust FBI, why should we?
Wilfully asleep at the wheel.
i am still fine with pierre wanting transparency. he doesnt want to be held to silence all his life. this is important and more important than secrecy
When all the leaks from the national post and everyone else comes out Poilioevre can hammer down. Duh
who is telling the truth? Dominic Leblanc or Elizabeth May?
Dominic says he will not release the names, because of legal consequences.
Wondering the same....kinda curious how no one gave a yes or no on that yet?
I'm curious how many prescription pills Elizibeth May was on when she read it. They probably gave her a chapter from a Jane Austin novel and she couldn't tell the difference.
Trick question, *neither* is being honest.
If he has access to the full report, he is right. Everyone but Trudeau that has access to the whole document can be jailed if they discuss it or release the names.
Legal consequences? How about the Truth!! And yes there ARE! Consequences!!!
Elizabeth May once more demonstrates how smart she thinks she is.
Elizabeth May....take a drink.
sounds like May already took a few extra drinks
@@lornarichardson5655 -- As I posted a while ago, someone in another channel posted this of Elizabeth May.. She saw a Drink Canada Dry sign once and took it as a challenge. lol
She has been drunk for more than 50 years
Is it such a crime to admit you agree with Poilievre/Conservatives that you have to emphasize ‘this one time’, Mulcair? Just own up and say yes I agree with him.
Pierre Poilievre is the equivalent to Trump in some people's minds.
TO HECK WITH YOUR MAGACANADIAN POILIEVRE
Come on, you expect a reasonable answer from the NDP? He should have called out Singh instead of "respecting" him. All just a bunch of Muppets. Don't give a crap about the country, just how they can fill their pockets. That goes for ALL of them !!!
@@Guitarist166 hahaha,...the standard Liberal comeback...so sad. Sorry but PP is nowhere near a Trump style politician.
yeah, it is a crime to agree with fishface poillievre and the self-servatives. you wanna dance the goosestep, move to israel.
Wow our reporters are totally clueless.
PMO presstititutes
With only 2 seats in the house, she can afford to be clueless. Nobody pays attention to her.
Mulcair has turned into a rex murphy…
Rex Murphy was a genuine legend. Not sure Mulcair will ever be.
May Rex Murphy rest in peace - irrepressible as he was alive.
I agree with Pierre Poilievre and Tom Mulcair is right. If Pierre do not want to be involved in it, they need to respect him. This government also have to follow the rules.
Elizabeth May is the leader of a party of ONE!! Only in Canada could this happen.
Troll, she’s amazingly smart
@@TessTearoe-zp5xvshe hides that well
@@albundy7623 maybe you should read her bio?
They currently have 2 green seats in parliament, and technically she is co-leader of the Greens.
@@TessTearoe-zp5xvIf she was truly smart, she would have built her party up by now.
Reporters face when he responds is priceless 😂😂😂
Yeah, because it was an incredibly stupid thing to say. Both Singh and May have read it and talked about it.
Yes because it was nonsense.
its a Gag order
Poilievre should just get his clearance and NOT read the report lol
Yeah why receive some classified information if you can't talk about it or ask further questions about it.
To be informed.
Looks like he didn't take the bait, eh Democrat?
@@bache72exactly
@@wyleecoyotee4252 informed to be silenced ya OK
Thank you Tom Mulclair. Glad to have you explain this so well
Ugh.
@@ClarityDetermination PP and Trump are going to win HUGE. The right is sweeping across Europe as we speak. "Ugh" yourself.
What May was saying was confusing. She is confused and maybe is time to retire.
De men tia
She's a drunk!
@@canadiansfor2Aand an irrelevant figure in Canada.
For all we know there are GREENS listed as working with foreign govts!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Maybe May is confused..................or maybe Greens have secrets of their own to hide!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Just because you don't understand something does not mean it's incorrect.
So he can ask questions about a subject he was offered the information about.
So he can instead of going to class just keep asking why ir what happened.
Release it to the public amd a judge to see if crimes committed or those quilty not re-elected.
Government leaders should be held to high standards. We have laws if someone steals
Yes it should be released to the public. But if PP reads it, that report will NEVER see the light of day again. PP will no longer be able to advocate for its release. He will no longer be able to pester the liberals to release it. He would essentially be gagged. Why do you think trudeau is so anxious to get PP to read it? That is the only way trudeau can sweep it all under the rug and make scandal #8,935 disappear.
That is ver odd as I have now no respect for Jagmeet Singh or the NDP anymore
This girl seems so surprised
She know who butters her bread
She can't believe in an actual unbiased opinion, it's so foreign to her.
I was surprised too, at the stupidity of his response. Her next question was intelligent.
Mulcair was only offering a suggestion as to how to play politics. He didn't care about Canadians and leaders working together the way they did before Poilievre.
@@vonclod123Mulcair? A very biased opinion.
@@ClarityDetermination They are all biased, but still once in awhile you might hear an honest opinion
If she says there is nothing to worry about..... We better be really worried.
Careful you are letting your liberal bias show too much Marcia. It’s not that you can’t figure out why he won’t read the report. You want him to lol
Yes. That's exactly what she and Trudeau and Jughead want, to get Poilievre to read it, and then he won't be able to make it public ! But Poilievre is too smart for that crap. That's why they are trembling in their boots. Way to go Pierre 😊 !
He's agreed with PP on multiple occasions.
Well, we sure know where Marcia's political leaning is: Liberal.
Dizzy Lizzy is a redundant political figure and her opinions on any given topic are about as welcome as a fly in your soup
😅😅😅
Her opinion is more welcome than your opinion, obviously.
We could have had Tom....
Whatever you say about Mad Tom you cannot say that he is unintelligent. And you would think that Marcia would be better prepared.
I don’t believe her. How can anyone believe “just trust me” with this debacle.
Mulcair agreed that the Speaker Fergus showed blatant partisanship when he kicked Pollievre out of the house over “Wacko” after Trudeau called him spineless.
Pretty much everyone who isn’t a Liberal partisan can see that one. The man’s a failure of a Speaker.
The fact that he had an *ethics* conviction against him should have been enough to bar him from the post in my opinion.
"The enemy of my enemy can sometimes serve as an ally of convenience."
Mulcair wasn't so much agreeing with Poilievre as piling on against Trudeau. That's standard partisan game-playing -- and unlike Poilievre he's smart enough to know better.
Mulcair is symptomatic of how the NDP has lost its way. Jagmeet Singh isn't a whole lot better. But at least they're just cynical, not cynical _and_ bonkers, like Poilievre.
@@bernardkung7306 Yeah, the NDP has and always will such. But you think Trudeau or Singh is better than Pollievre? That is just Wacko.
Tom, you need to get back to leading the NDP. Jagmeet has run the party into the ground. Please for the love of Canada, go back and turn the party around.
The NPD and the Liberals have lost all credibility so no one will be able to do anything for decades to prop them up.
Mulcair ran the NDP into the ground, look at the stats. Jagmeet is trying to pull the numbers back up
The NDP need a popular working class Quebecois leader
Any idea why jagment was banned from India?
@@canadiansfor2A stay out of canadian politics, yankee doodle.
I would back up Poilievre again. Why be held to secrecy if he reads the report.
Because he wants to be PM, and as such should be informed.
Don't the parties have deputy leaders who could provide the official party statement on the issue if the leader reads the report? Wouldn't every party want to know if they have potential problems in the party?
Mulcair making the right call. I respect that maybe there is hope for Canada.
He opted to play politics instead of suggesting the leaders work together and solve this.
Remove the parliament privacy disclosure. Canadians need to know now!!!!!!!
They won't because there are no names besides the one May referred to, who is no longer an MP. This is why the Liberals are so angry with her. Tough titties Libs!
Tom would not accept a security clearance to read this report so if he were leader he could see who the “ foreign “ agents are because he then would be bound by it?? That is very disappointing! He just lost the last bit of respect I once had for him!! He was my choice for PM back in the day but then he said he would reduce the deficit while increasing spending at the same time! With that stupid statement, he lost my vote! Perhaps he is not nearly as clever as he thinks he is?
If he reads it he is under a gag order .
Now pierer can still fight for the names to be realized .
Once a y mp reads it they can't talk about what they read they can't fight in parliment for the names to be made public .
Might just as well call her "Senator May" now---she's working for it, she'll retire before Justin leaves and he'll appoint her as a reward.
Tom is exactly right and Pierre is right because you can't read a document and be bound by that clearance not to being able to hold Trudeau and his government accountable. Pierre is a very smart person and a ture Canadian.
If I was the leader of the opposition, I would not read the documents. By not reading it, the leader of the opposition has plausible deniability. Why would he want to be entangled up, in another one of the Liberal government's scandals? Pierre is not stupid! That's why he will get my vote.
The report should be indorsed to the DOJ for further investigation and indictment of those who have violated the law
He says he wouldn't read because then he couldn't talk about it, but then how can you talk about something you haven't read? Am I taking crazy pills? 😂
Because he can talk about it being another coverup
Canadians deserve to know regardless of your political persuasion. Let the truth out.
boy does Mulcair look rough
We all get old and grey :(
As though the green party has any relevance, and is the report that May saw the whole story, I doubt it
I still dont understand why Elizabeth May seen it. She is a nobody.
This interviewer is definitely liberal 😅
So to be clear, Tom, you wouldn’t read the report because then you couldn’t talk about what’s in the report. Bizarre.
Are you daft?
tom cannot read the report because he does not have the security clearance.
Anyone who reads the report is then precluded from talking about it which is what the gag order is referring to.
Hug your Justin plushy tight
@@shuaibshariff2797 Except for Elizabeth May? Who read it and is obviously talking about what's in it.
Lol she didn’t expect him to say that 😂😂
TheLiberals would love Pierre to read the report so he has to not talk about it.
What they would really love , is for him to read it , and speak about it , so they could call for his arrest
@@cindyhaduik7171 True.
This is the worst government I've seen and I'm from the Diefenbaker area, trust me 😢
I'm mid 50s & am appalled by the lack of moral character in all 3 of the parties leaders.
Hey,Dief took a bunch of unemployed coal miners in the 60s and made them stone masons and rebuilt 1/3 of the original Fortress of Louisbourg, the largest reconstruction of a historic site in North America, funny how politicians ALL turn out to be 6 of one and half dozen of the other, old Dief scored points on the east coast for that one, imo no party has a decent leader right now.
Agree destroying Canada 😢
@@peforster6725 Pierre Poilievre has my vote , he's so much smarter then all of them, I love common sense. ❤️ Canada 🙏 🇨🇦
The liberals are leading our country amazingly and the leader of the opposition has never worked so blatantly against the government and Canadians.
The presstitute was surprised.
Totally !!!!
Drunk old Liz probably has something to lose out of publishing those names. 👌
Respect to Mulcair for not just blindly taking an anti-conservative position. Appreciate his honesty and integrity!
Also, PP doesn't have, and either doesn't want to have, or cant get, security clearance. Which in all fairness puts into question how he can do his job as opposition leader. Because he seems to to think his job is just to bluster and fight and literally OPPOSE everything.
That is literally his job. He's the leader of the OPPOSITION.
So you think it's a great idea to agree to have knowledge of grievous harm to this country and be legally, Morally and ethically bound not to reveal it or do anything about it? I guess we know who you vote for.
@@1alayzzia There are mo names in the report anyhow. And I think he should get his security clearance, and if can't get it because of something in his past, me needs to step down and let someone actually qualified run the party . Also, you have no idea who I vote for, but I know for a FACT who you do. At least, whichever party I vote for is trying to actually get the business of the country done and not just being no better or cooperative than a f*cking cinder block.
@@kevinthompson7649 oh, so you have security clearance and have read the report? Elizabeth May is a crazy liar when she mentions names in the report?
And this government has run this country into the ground. Twenty five percent of canadians are having a hard time affording food. And this is just the beginning. And by the way I used to vote NDP. I have learned the error of my ways. And though i'm honestly a little weary of PP, I am.
Utterly disgusted by the actions of this government. I can't imagine ever being enticed to vote liberal/ndp again. And I don't know where you get the idea that he doesn't have clearance. If he didn't have clearance he wouldn't have to refuse to read it.
Pierre is the BEST.
Nah, multi-millionaire Pierre is the worst by far. As minister of "Democratic Reform" he used classic Republican style voter suppression that resulted in 172,000 CDNs not voting in the 2015 election. That alone is disqualifying. Anyone who disenfranchised CDNs out of their most fundamental right in a democracy - is totally unfit to lead!
She knows nothing. Anyone who has had a clearance would understand this.
She’s a former weather girl. It shows.
Corrupt frat girl.
For those who don't quite understand what is happening. If u read a report that contains top secret information, u r legally and morally liable if u spill secret information, accidentally or not. By not reading the document and having only a 'cleaned' version shared, u completely remove the accidental part of the equation and u can ask any question you essentially want without foreknowledge if it touches anything that may secret or not. The onus is now on the answer to protect secrecy.
But shooting your mouth with no knowledge is ok? Seriously
@@TessTearoe-zp5xv Okay? I'm not sure, but it probably means you vote liberal.
@@TessTearoe-zp5xv right, and so at that point it will be up to voters to decide what's acceptable/constructive or not.
@@TessTearoe-zp5xv what’s he shooting his mouth on about that isn’t real? Every question he asks is based directly off information that has been released. Liberals thinks it’s a crime to ask questions but not a crime when an atrocity is committed. Very logical!
@@TessTearoe-zp5xv How self-aware you are!
Polivier is a very smart person and he knows the liberals are trying to shut him up or put him in jail.
What is he hiding?
@@ProgressiveWindsor the material that would lock all the liberal caucus in jail
if the Liberals wanted to shut him up or put him in jail, it would be done already
rhetoric like this pretty much disqualifies you from participating in the convo though. You need help.
lol... there are no "smart" convoy clowns.
He finally told the truth about something for a change
tom seems quite reasonable and it makes me think what a dumpsterfire the ndp is now. were they ever a normal party?
WHAT DON"T YOU GET< IF HE GETS THE SECRET INFO HE CAN"T ACT ON IT .
"I wouldn't want to be hamstrung as party leader and be told that now that I've seen this I can't say that."...
So did you read the legislation? ... No. I didn't want to be hamgstrung as party leader and be told that now that I've seen this I can't say that.
So did you read the medical trial data?... No. I didn't want to be hamgstrung as party leader and be told that now that I've seen this I can't say that.
So, did you read the report on our national security and foreign interference?... No. I didn't want to be hamgstrung as party leader and be told that now that I've seen this I can't say that.
So, did you read the constitution and bill of rights?...
Your trolley is off the track, he seriously doesn’t know what he’s talking about. Literally!
Part of the liberal TruAnon parade, peddling their leftie conspiracy theories.
Pierre is 100% correct to not sign that pathetic silencing agreement.
Yeah national security isn't important so why bother reading it .
Don’t expect reason from ideological buffoons
@@AtteliaVelif he reads it, he cant speak to it.
All of these dummies online exasperate me with their stupidity , " Why won't Pierre get a security clearence ?"
@@robdavidson2569 jagmeet read it and very broadly talked about it . Fact is pp doesn't know anything and doesn't care . Politics before canadians is the cpc mantra
Not your NDP party anymore eh Ed Broadbent? 😢
May should be charged. She was not supposed to discuss the report as per the oath she had to make in order to get security clearance to read it. Where is her consequence for oath breaking?
😮Sooo... it's more important to keep from finding out too much, because that will just leave you 😂 "hamstrung"😂 ... which I think means you just want plausible deniability.
Nice try... 😡
If that is what you take away from this rather elegant Explanation of why he can't, i weep for your children.
Brilliant move on Poilievre’s part
He only does what Harper instructs him to do. Notice when he gets loud and quiet.
Marcie loves the Liberals obviously!😁
Those who have read it, do you see them doing anything about it? No!!
They are now in-the-know and should be charged with aiding and abetting domestic and foreign terrorism.
Nothing to see then the liberals should declassified it.
The matter should have been handled by an unbiased 3rd party, but they botched the special rapporteur.
Muclair : PP needs to be able to speak about something he knows nothing about..... great arguement
And once he knows he can't talk about it. Now he can bang a pot and keep attention on it.
OTOH, by reading the report you are agreeing to not reveal or act on its contents, so reading it means it is a gag order. That is why PP won't read it and thus won't agree to a gag order.
Elizabeth May must be on the list
This is an example of reporters being bias. Pierre has explained this several times. Tom explains it to her and she still doesn’t get it and is confusing the public she is supposed to be informing.
She looks like a corrupt little frat girl. Money buys some loyalty, sadly.