Johnny Depp Wins Defamation Case! Amber Heard Ordered to Pay Him $10 Million! Verdict, Reactions, &
Vložit
- čas přidán 5. 07. 2024
- Start your free trial today: www.Squarespace.com/Phil & enter offer code “Phil” to get 10% off your first purchase!
News You Might Have Missed: • WHO LEAKED IT?! Bo Bur...
TEXT ME! +1 (813) 213-4423
Get More Phil: linktr.ee/PhilipDeFranco
-
00:00 - Johnny Depp Largely Wins Defamation Case Against Amber Heard
02:12 - Elon Musk Tells Tesla Staff to Return to Office or Leave
04:40 - Elon Musk Gets Into Spat With Video Game Site
06:22 - Sponsor
07:08 - Supreme Court Blocks Texas Law Regulating Social Media
09:51 - Small Amounts of Some Substances Temporarily Decriminalized in British Columbia
-
✩ TODAY’S STORIES ✩
Johnny Depp Largely Wins Defamation Case Against Amber Heard:
www.washingtonpost.com/arts-e...
Elon Musk Tells Tesla Staff to Return to Office or Leave:
roguerocket.com/2022/06/01/mu...
Elon Musk Gets Into Spat With Video Game Site:
kotaku.com/elon-musk-hard-dri...
Supreme Court Blocks Texas Law Regulating Social Media:
roguerocket.com/2022/06/01/su...
Small Amounts of Some Substances Temporarily Decriminalized in British Columbia:
/ 1532043309430063109
----------
Produced by: Cory Ray
Edited by: James Girardier, Maxwell Enright, Julie Goldberg
Art Department: Brian Borst, William Crespo
Writing/Research: Philip DeFranco, Brian Espinoza, Maddie Crichton, Lili Stenn, Ben Wheeler, Chris Tolve
Production Team: Zack Taylor, Emma Leid
------------
#DeFranco #JohnnyDepp #AmberHeard
------------ - Zábava
We have Congresswoman Katie Porter joining us tomorrow along with a lot more lined up. Love yo faces and see you tomorrow :)
Oh she's awesome. I can't wait
NO WAY HOW DID YOU MANAGE THAT!? THATS GONNA BE AWESOME
Will her white board be joining her!?!
Awesome! And poor Phil imagine having a plan for today's show and then the verdict came down and you gotta re-tool the upload 😂
They just gave Elon what he asked for. Uncomfortable truths.
I'm sick of journalists saying things like "his verdict being read first isn't fair." It's literally how the law works, it was his case.
Lol literally he sued then she COUNTER sued which means she comes second
why would that even matter? the outcome is the same, just some words are swapped around
What would changing the order even matter anyways? It's not gonna change what the verdict was.
Exactly, he sued her and she countersued of course his case is read first, it was submitted first. I hate that people are trying to turn into a man vs women bias.
who is saying this. which journalist lol
The fact that she says this is a step backward for women after the verdict when in one recording she said to Johnny to tell the world about the abuse on him and that no one would believe it. The hypocrisy...
And the fact that that tape exists and people are still saying how this verdict is some dangerous thing towards women
@@jordanmachuca6087 the fact that this tape excists, she probably took it AND leaked it, somehow believes that she comes off good in it AND still claims HE is the one who abused HER, just proves how delusional she is.
Not to mention the audio where she literally States she's hitting him. a As Camille said if a man would have made the same statements it would have already been over. Those who support Amber are doing nothing but gender bias they don't care about fairness they're the ones that hate men they just hate men.
Yes exactly! She is so manipulative. Glad that she was exposed
I know I shouldn't go off-topic but I need to know who are the characters in your pfp? I like them, they look like they're from an anime or something
The scary thing about elon and the 40 hours in office is when he says “this is less than we ask of factory workers”. That sounds like hell on earth!
I'm glad he's calling them out then. They still get to sit in an office. Fuck them.
Edit: And the product has to be made somehow so obviously people will have to work in the factory. I just hope they work in safe work environments. But who knows.
They get paid overtime and they choose to work there. I get that working isn’t optional, but I’m sure they can find somewhere that doesn’t work 60hr weeks
Honestly 40 hours a week sounds fan fucking tastic! I currently work 10 to 12 hours a day for 7 days straight followed by 2 days off. I used to work for Tesla and I would only work like 40 hours a week, and during EOQ, I'd work like 60 to 70 hours a week and would get paid overtime and double time. I had it so much better and I didn't even realize.
@@banana551000 As employees, its our responsibility to maintain fair working conditions bc its not in management or corporates benefit to give them to us (its not right but once one abandons the sentiment that life is or should be fair it becomes a whole lot less painful). We have power that all to often we give away. It is however a team effort but as an employee I personally refuse to be a pawn that burns itself out for a company to which I am nothing but a cog in the machine.
@@banana551000 you shouldn't have to work that much is the point. You should get a living wage working reasonable times
Idiots on Twitter claim Amber Heard's loss is bad for women while completely ignoring the 3 most powerful shining stars of this case were women. Camille Vasquez, JDs lawyer was amazing during this trial, Dr Shannon Curry's evidence as an expert witness was exemplary and Judge Azcarate was a fantastic judge. All three were total bosses, and we should never forget that.
Camille 1000% deserves to make partner, without her Johnny might not have won, and his career saved.
Bro Johnny’s lawer was funny asf. Kept catching amber when she was cappin so hardd 🧢
Dr. Curry was so sharp, I myself felt like maybe I'd been cut. It was amazing to watch a witness not allow themselves to be manhandled in a trial.
If I could like this comment more, I would. So true.
saying there are "bosses" says everything I need to know about you, just completely clueless.
Amber is right, this will set women back, but not because Johnny won, but because amber lied and falsely accused and ruined Johnny's entire life. She herself inadvertently set women back.
I completely agree
Not gonna lie, you had me on the first part.
Exactly this^^^
exactly right
I feel like Azcarate, Vasquez and others have shown the world that women can be all the good things men can be, while Amber Heard shows that women can be all the bad things men can be. This is a big win for women, for men, and for equality.
I am honestly surprised people exist who are upset with the verdict. Really makes me wonder what world they’re living in or what trial they watched
i found some brainwashed amber subreddits. its pretty wack how they were 'trying to turn the tide' after she was pretty much proven guilty early on as the abuser. to be honest everyone i talked to didnt think JD would actually win, and that this was basically a stage and PR to prove that he wasnt a sociopathic abuser to clear his name no matter if he won or lost.
That’s what I’m saying!
They didn't watch the trial, they read a mainstream narrative from reporters who probably didn't even watch the whole thing
they are the same people who think "vice news" is a reliable source
(Hint: it's not)
That's what I was thinking, it was pretty clear in the end that Amber was a pretty toxic person who had lied multiple times..
WFH is super important for disabled folks. We've asked for it for years and it fell on deaf ears, but the moment able people needed to work from home, society accepted it and made it possible.
I saw someone give a great response to a Depp v Heard article claiming that this case told women to be quiet about abuse. They said something to the effect of: No, one should never have to be quiet about abuse. What this case have shown is that one does not _lie_ about abuse. One does not manipulate, gaslight, bully and intimidate their way through something like this. No matter the gender of the abuser or the victim of the abuse.
Thats what i feel ive been taking away from this whole thing.
Hard to live in "America" huh?
For disabled people, being able to work from home is amazing. Companies always said it couldn't be done but then the pandemic hit and magically it's possible!
Thank you! I’ve actually been fired for asking to have a hybrid job for my disability!
I also thinks it’s amazing for some parents, I can get what I need to get done when I’m at home and still manage to take care of the kids. Mine are a bit older so that probably makes a difference. It’s been so wonderful to not have to worry about childcare for the last 2 years.
@@kalengell1871 EXACTLY. For a lot of people who might otherwise find themselves forced to rely on govt assistance because workplaces won't give them a chance, working from home allows people with all kinds of disabilities to work to their full potential. I suspect that those who claim hard work can only be done in the office actually struggle with self-control and focus themselves, which is why they don't realise other people can actually drive themselves and be self-disciplined.
Think of all the environmental, physical and emotional damage that could be avoided if executive teams didn't feel the need to wield their power. It honestly has so many benefits but as always it comes down to control.
That’s great, but 9 times out of 10 it creates problems or inefficiencies. Of course it’s POSSIBLE, when necessity calls, but unless you’re a certain kind of person, it’s detrimental to the company.
I have two examples of this currently affecting me. One is a client, who I used to be able to meet with at his place of work, and we collaborated often. Now he works from home and barely knows what’s going on on-site so hashing things out with him is now a grueling process.
The other is a supplier. Again, she’s not on-site so instead of being able to give me an update on an order, it takes days, sometimes WEEKS to get an answer, and anything out-of-process that needs direct intervention? Good luck!
So while I know it’s possible, in the majority of cases I strongly believe it’s inefficient.
it really goes to show how detached from
reality Elon Musk is when “workers in a Chinese sweatshop can do it so why can’t you” seems like a valid argument
Dont agree with having people having to work 12hr a day 6 days a week, but his not wrong about chinese work culture. In many workplaces especially in tech industries in china it' "required" to work 12hrs 6 days in a week. It' called "996" 9am - 9pm 6 days a week. Thou he cant expect western work culture to confirm with chinese work culture.
Also shows why he had a Chinese sweatshop instead of more American factories.
He really does believe that our lives are worthless except what they are worth to HIM in particular. People should be really alarmed when the billionaires start saying this stuff out loud in public.
I don't agree with Elon, but He told people that where given $45,000,000 in stock and who make $200,000 a year to work 40 hours a week at the office.
@@yangxiu4341 All ELon cares about is making himself richer.
The fact that some still defend Heard even after hearing the trial means we have a much bigger problem than sexism against women. Too many have this strange stance that women should be believed just because they are women. I was raised by a single mother who was an abuse survivor and she thinks women like Amber Heard are disgusting. she has weaponized her femininity and thought it would be enough to sink a man's career.
I agree. I hate that Heard continues to act like this is some big representation of female abuse victims. She's using that as a manipulation tactic to try to paint those who disagree with her in a bad light ("you're against women!!!") and it's disgusting.
It was enough, that's the sad thing. She needs proper punishment.
My rule is that if someone close to me discloses abuse, I believe them, period. If they feel that their situation was abusive, I will never tell them otherwise. But in court, you have to have evidence. Now, does that mean that how we interrogate the victim and handle the collection of that evidence justifies the means? Absolutely not. There are a 1000 case examples of people re-victimizing someone who was SA'd in an effort to "prove" she was wrong. There are always a 1000 case examples of judges going leniently on men who were found guilty from that evidence. The system still needs to change, but the rule can not be that in the court of law we always believe women because that infantilizes women and makes them less than full humans who are capable of complex lies and agendas. I'm with your mom, these women disgust me.
@@peppermintbee Statistics suggest that over 87% of abuse accusations made by women are either outright false or don't fit the evidence.
The biggest problem abuse victims face in regards to credibility is the vast majority of non-victims making false claims.
Children and men are even less likely to be believed, especially if the abuser is a woman.
@@peppermintbee The big issue was how the allegation was the reckoning and not the proof of the allegation. That alone tells me how people are blind or too emotionally distraught when they think Depp was an abuser without his day in court. People want to rally those who are in pain and felt injustice to get their justice by demanding someone be cancelled.
“If they want to work from home they have to do a minimum of 40 hours per week in the office” … honestly thought that was a joke. In the UK, the average weekly working hours is 42. The US once again reminding me of how good we’ve got it…
The “normal” full time work week in America is 40 hours. Not what Elon is forcing his employees to do. Personally I spend 1/2 my workday at home and the other 1/2 in person.
@@Bea-a-deer that makes more sense! Thanks for clarifying :)
Well, in the UK full time is 35 hours or more but if you work more than 40 you have to sign a contract to say you agreed to do it which makes Elon even more disgusting
@@crowbot748 I’m on a 42 hour week full time contract but that includes an hour for lunch over 5 days so it works out at 37 hours of actual work
@@CC-tc1yi Oh we don't get lunch hours with our 40 hours a week. I eat at my desk, otherwise its considered outside of my 40 hours.
" Amber heard had more evidence then 99.999% of domestic abuse survivors "
Did.. did we watch the same trial? Cuz I don't think we did.
IKR? literal braindead feminist take.
I don't know where the 99.99% of the evidence was.
@@CrunchyTofu obviously Johnny used his bot army to bury it all.
Don't forget that she had all of that evidence because she was fabricating. She had all parts of her story perfectly curated, and any person probably will believe that story. Johnny's counter-evidence undermined that story, and here we are.
Amber even said on the stand that nobody is listening to "her" story
4 comments can only see 2 the fuck CZcams.
Anyone who watched the entire trial and actually paid attention, knows that Amber had the opportunity just like Johnny. I’m sick of her making it seem like she’s a victim, she’s NOT. It has nothing to do with “society” or anything like that. She was an abuser, and her evidence showed us that loud and clear.
"Her evidence showed us that" is so important as well because its not as if it was only johnnys evidence that pointed that way. Her own evidence showed her to be an abuser and people are still saying she was a victim
not only that, she's doubling down on the victim card. Check on her IG. She locked the comments which shows that she really cares about the free speech she's preaching around.
She wanted us to believe all 8+ people on stand giving testimony were ALL liars, that they would risk their money and freedom for an old man that plays a pirate in a Disney movie? Because what would that get them... the grace of Johnny Depp? I know people go crazy for celebrities but every single person on stand, including Amber, looked so tired and worn out.
@@callanc3925 she's a victim of memes. Good memes at that.
Yeah, that tweet that said more than 99.9% is very obviously part of 86% of statistics - made up on the spot ;)
As someone who has been working remotely for the past 8 years, I have become convinced that people who oppose remote work give away their own lack of discipline and work ethic because they assume that everyone else slacks off the same way they do when they work remotely. Based on my own personal observations, about 25% of workers do indeed need the "office" environment and constant oversight to stay productive. Why not let those 25% of people come back if they wish to do so and let the other 75% enjoy their increased productivity while working remotely? Why not base this on actual numbers/results and monitor productivity on a case by case basis? Elon Musk should know better than to make gut decisions without looking at factual evidence.
Nice try bludger
This is a fair point. Allow me to take this a step further.
In addition to lack of discipline and work ethic, how many of those people opposed to remote work are opposed because the only promotions they received are as a result of "non work related socializing" at the office with their frat buddy from college?
How many managers entire careers only exist because someone has to do the busy work of checking in and making sure people are still working * at that Division (you know the one) that upper management only remembers its existence when something horribly wrong has already happened ** ?
How about Not hiring those workers that require direct over site and the hand-holding/authoritarian environment to get things done?
That would mean an employer would then Not need to to hire an overseer who's sole purpose is to go from cubicle to cubicle making certain people are working. When instead they should be doing ANY of the other things expected of management.
(like making sure that the people a that Are doing useful work have what they need to be their most efficient)
That is just throwing good money after bad. Speaking of doing exactly that, making an office space to do the work in is expensive to rent/operate. Especially if Upper Management primarily uses it as a setting within which they can get brown nosed by lessers jockeying for positions in the rat race.
Or flex on their peers via the size, location, view, privacy of their own work spaces etc.
*whether its walking up to your cubicle to tell you that you have to come in on Saturday or scheduling a 2 hour meeting first thing monday the information content of which could be expressed in one email you read and comprehend in 10 minutes
** or more often, when ever they have to reduce the payroll budget. Again. To make their quarterly numbers look good enough to justify their own continued employment.
I'm on board with this take. I've had the same experience with online uni classes, where most of my classmates could get their work done at home no problem, but I would still schedule a time every day to go do schoolwork in the local library, because I need the environment.
some people need the structured environment at work, others can create that structure themselves at home.
@@StumpyDaPaladin your comment was a very long read... and totally worth it. I've worked in offices where managers got their jobs because of brown nosing. You hit the nail on the head on all your points.
@@pisces031372aj Thanks :)
Hard Drive pulled out the aluminum bat and just kept swinging.
As a disabled person, work from home is a godsend. Getting to the office takes SO MUCH of my energy, and often I would miss work because I couldn't guarantee that I'd be in a condition to drive home safely at the end of the day. Working from home, I pick my own hours, if I need to lay down and rest in the middle of the workday, I can. I'm more productive because I can put my energy into ACTUALLY WORKING.
Yes! I’m so glad. I had a customer tell me back in 2020 that she has been begging her work for years to let her work from home due to a disability and they always say nope can’t be done. At that time, they had of course sent all workers home and she could finally work comfortably! Sad that it took a pandemic to get that result.
Absolutly but you see, it dosnt matter what you do and we have to see what the majority is doing and if you look there , most of them are jerkoffs that just get payed for not doing anything!
Yeah Elon seems a little detached from the regular working person IMO. Of course it’s like that with most higher ups in companies because they care too much about the dollar sign and not enough about the people who work at the company to help produce that dollar amount.
It’s kind of stupid because if the job can be done at home, what’s the big deal? You can still hold your employees accountable for their productivity regardless of where the work is done. Having people work from home could save companies money depending on the situation and of course really work great for those that struggle out there.
If you don't mind me asking, what do you work at and what's your disability? /gen
Yes same!!
In a voice dripping with cruelty and malice Amber said "Tell the world, Johnny, tell them, Johnny Depp, I, Johnny Depp, a man, I'm a victim too of domestic violence, see how many people believe or side with you."
So he did and I couldn't be more proud of him. I hope this verdict is the first step of the healing Johnny so needs.
Imagine the sadism and condescension she must've had when she dared him to speak up
And we Believe him Scamber, we believe him.
@@kimberleywilliams7802 millions and millions of us.
wrong. edited clip, she said "man", not "a man", and she was talking about a specific fight they had, and directly after this said "exactly, because you're big, you're bigger and you're stronger"
@@MJ_M doesn’t change the greater meaning if that were the case.
Amber Heard: "... mountain of evidence..."
Which would've helped if you actually showed it in court. Shameful, especially when Depp was able to show a mountain of evidence instead. *facepalm*
Genuinely baffled there's anyone who could side with Amber after watching the trial, all her evidence was flimsy at best while Johnny's was pretty solid throughout.
the fact is most people who sided with her DIDNT watch the trial. They think those of us who sided with Depp got our info from TikTok...
I think it’s near to impossible to side with Amber if you actually watch the trial. Every hot take I’ve heard that supports Amber is from someone who didn’t actually watch the trial. Those people don’t want or care about the facts. They only care about perpetuating their preferred narrative
Those people didn’t watch the trial they didn’t care about the truth at all
@@sensoine oh no, they watched it 100% they are just delusional just like flat earthers
There are people who believe women regardless of fact or reason.
I'm all for believing women's stories. Truthful until proven otherwise.
VICTIMS should be taken seriously, regardless of gender. I'm so disgusted by AH's weaponization of women's suffering. This is not an attack on women. It's an attack on abusers playing the victim. #justiceforjohnny 💯
> VICTIMS should be taken seriously
AH claimed she was a victim. So we have to be very careful when we say this... People who claim to be victims shouldn't be taken seriously. Not until you have all the facts and have heard the story from both sides.
Amber Heard is out there speaking like a full arse Misandrist... "Wome women women" how about "Abuse has no gender" and "Abuse knows no barriers".
But that would require AH to actually acknowledge she was the most toxic person in that relationship. Based on what we all saw play out, I'm going to say she's been like this so long she'll never accept that she's the problem. In all her relationships.
Well said.
@@Sancarn Victims SHOULD be taken seriously, but the vilification of the alleged abuser should be reserved for when more information comes to light.
Statistically, those who claim to be victims of DV are almost always telling the truth. For that, they should be taken seriously, and listened to. However the accused also deserves the chance to apologize for their actions, taking responsibility, or disprove the allegations.
@@mikehorne4053 how can you take them seriously if they aren't a victim?
After hearing the audio recordings of amber heard clearly being the aggressor, and challenging Johnny to tell someone since he wouldn't be believed, I will never be able to support amber ever again. She made it crystal clear that she was trying to ruin his career with false accusations, and thinking that she was safe in her lie because she is a woman is unacceptable and honestly unforgivable. Amber set back the progress made by other women by shamelessly doubling down and supporting her lie. Fuck that.
It was proven in court by experts that Heard's team falsified evidence, including manipulating images with editing software. Heard herself lied in court multiple times, the especially hilarious one was when she said admitted to writing the article and that it was in fact about Depp. Various experts related to a number of fields pointed to Depp being a victim. That doesn't mean they weren't mutually abusive to one another, but it at least proves it wasn't one sided. The fact that anyone would think that Heard brought fourth as much evidence as actual abuse victims is insane.
Nearly everything that they presented was faulty in one way or another on top of various pieces of evidences being proven false like I said. I'm fairly confident in saying that anyone that doesn't agree with the verdict wasn't actually watching this case unfold. The only thing that even came close to helping Heard's case in some way was a video in which she decided to secretly film Depp losing his mind instead of trying to comfort him right after his mother died, which probably back fired for them because she sure as hell didn't look good in that situation as well.
And when she said she had donated the settlement
I also agree, that anyone who doesn’t agree with the verdict simply didn’t watch the trial.
They’re also footage showing her call the cops and trash Johnny’s penthouse with her friends and her alleged makeup artist who admit that she can fake bruise on someone after Johnny left and in all the footage she was fine, but strangely the next day tmz received footage. Her mom also sent text to johnny that she was forced by her lawyer. However media and people who didn’t watch the trial still believe her.
"Her evidence wasn't enough" WE ARE TALKING ABOUT EDITED PICTURES LMAO THAT IS NOT WHAT REAL EVIDENCE IS
Also her literal MULTIPLE recorded audio confessions!! From her own mouth!!!!
She had evidence though. However, her evidence was "incomplete" in a sense - she had photos of a broken bedframe, however, there is a pocket knife on the bed in the same exact photo. She also claimed that there was blood on the pillows on the bed, yet she didn't take any photos of pillows with blood on them.
She claimed that she was punched in the face by him more times than she could count while he was wearing lots of rings - but she shows us a photo from after the accident in which she has a very round bruise on her arm while her face is completely clear of any bruises or marks. If someone gets hit even once in the face with a fistfull of rings, their face would be battered.
She literally presented the same photo as evidence twice - except that one of the photos was CLEARLY edited in order to make her face look more red. They pointed this out during Amber's cross. That's basically falsification of evidence.
She presented two photos of spilled wine that were taken around the same time and she used them for 2 different instances of abuse that allegedly happened MONTHS apart. Every drop of the spilled wine in those photos was literally identical. That's another instance of misrepresenting/falsifying evidence.
It's insane to me how anyone could believe her after ALL of these inconsistencies.
I love the fact that Elon Musk openly admits he overworks all his employees, demanding over 40 hours per week from everyone, and acts like that's not an issue in any way. Then he's proud of the fact that in countries without labour laws, his employees are expected to put in a minimum of 72 hours. Exploitation much?
And yet, so many people adore him. One of my best friends is obsessed with him, and he's fully pro workers rights. He himself would not work a job that is that many hours, and we have spent many an hour discussing the pros of letting people work in the way that suits them. And yet, he loves Elon. It is a contradiction that I hope he one day realizes, because whatever accomplishments Tesla achieves, the ends do not justify the means.
Yeah I honestly don’t understand how people support this guy. Also, the irony of a billionaire talking about hard work lmao
@@LadyAurian Mainly cause they only read the heart emoji news pieces or YT vids covering him. I mean I was under the "pro-Elon" thing for a little bit. Show them the shittiness of Elon, not the 10 second soundbytes or weird twitter posts that make him seem relatable.
It’s a d-bag. I hope the electric vehicles other companies are making leave him in the dust. They’re likely not better, worker treatment wise, but at least they’re not standing there acting like their god’s gift to mankind. He’s a sweatshop owner acting like he’s not building his wealthy off the backs of everyone else’s labour
@@LadyAurian We all have so much information we can all access, way more than we'll ever need, yet people can't seem to look at all the things that really show us what kind of person Elon Musk is.
It's honestly frustrating because I was in that camp too, I saw him on Pewdiepie's meme review and thought it was cool of him to do that, thought nicely of him but then stared seeing more and more and realized how much his positive interactions made me gloss over the signs that he is, in fact, just another dickhead billionaire.
The case should be viewed as "MenToo" instead of "Women are liars". People are focusing on the wrong thing in my opinion. They are not holding Heard accountable for her actions. Her abuse against Depp. That is what is wrong.
yea i think MeToo movement shouldnt just be believe women but believe/support all survivors. until any contradictory proof comes out against them ofc
I agree. At this point the "me too" movement needs to evolve to include all victims of abuse regardless of gender.
@@caxtillo9876
It already did. Did you forget that several victim in the "Me Too" movement such as Brendan Fraser and Terry Crews were male? Heck, one of the most prominent predator exposed by Me Too was Kevin Spacey and he targeted men.
I believe it has been. The only people I've heard focusing on the "women are liars" perspective have been Heard sympathisers. I haven't heard from a single person who has been exposed to this trial in any capacity and actually come to the conclusion that because Heard lied, every woman who comes forward is lying.
The biggest think I learned from other abuse survivors is that they say no one will believe them and try to discredit them like Amber did with Johnny, so it does make it harder and scarier bur also why we should hear both sides and investigate all accusation, because there might still be a victim just the other party.
As a female survivor of domestic abuse I'm genuinely insulted by men on Twitter telling me how I should feel. I support Johnny not amber. Saying that we all hate women because we don't support Amber is really disingenuous to people like me.
I watched basically the whole case. People support Johnny for a reason.
Johnny is obviously a victim. So men on Twitter, quit victim shaming JD. Fuck.
Edit: this isn't an issue yet(in comments on this comment 🤷🏼♀️) but we need to stop shaming Amber too. I don't think enough people are saying that.
I agree, since I, a woman was a victim of domestic violence by another woman. This strange belief that women can’t be abusers is astounding to me, not to mention pretty insulting.
It’s so sad that some people feel he couldn’t have been abused because he’s a man... Anybody is capable of being hurt, anybody is capable of doing the hurting.
I just wish you, JD, and anyone else who’s dealt with something so difficult peace and a safer, more comfortable future. It’s deserved
Ignore them most of them didn’t watch the trial and just want to be contrarian. Journalist still pretend she’s a victim because they don’t believe men can be victim of abuse. They’re insult for all true survivors of domestic abuse, your brave and strong we’re all with you 💪
One of the best things for my mental health I ever did was delete twitter, can’t recommend it highly enough.
@@oliverhumphris4771 100% agree. social media in general is horrible for ones mental health.
I can't believe there are still some people taking Amber heard sides
As a Portuguese: decriminalisation of drugs here was the best thing that could’ve happened. At the time, there was an utter drug epidemic (specially in Lisbon). After the decriminalisation and a focus on treatment of drugs as a health problem, crime and traffic went down, such as overdoses and consumption of hard drugs. To this day, hard drugs are simply not at problem as they were 20 years ago.
That’s amazing!
I remember when I first heard of decriminalizing drugs in an effort to better public health, I thought it was crazy! I'm sure most people did. Totally checks out though, and makes perfect sense if you think about it for longer than 60 seconds
Wasn't "specially in Lisbon", Lisbon and Porto had the two major "drug malls" in Europe back in late 80's and throughout the 90's.
Anyway, I had several friends who died to drug abuse (O.D. and disease due to health decline), mostly heroin, prior to the law being signed.
When I see zombie movies it's the faces and skeleton-bodies of those long gone friends I remember, their blank stare - of people who I grew up with - when they passed by, not showing a hint that they recognized me, or cared, just them trying to get the next fix. And the stench...
After the law came into effect? Haven't lost a single friend, and know of a few who were addicted but managed to rehabilitate themselves and get on with their lives because of that shift in paradigm from crime to health issue. I'm not certain but I think that, overall, we increased slightly the consumption of lesser drugs such as cannabis, but for hard drugs it was like night and day: it dropped hard, and people were given the opportunity to get proper care. A wonderful thing happens when people have the assurance that they have a health problem (addiction) and that they are not criminals.
There's a line in the documentary Where to Invade Next from one of the Portuguese experts on the subject. He warned that their solution will not work in the US because we don't have centralized, universal healthcare. We don't have the services people need to actually get treatment.
I've had the complete opposite experience as a son of a cocaine addict. My area is riddled with drug peddlers and the people who suffer from that are the families of those who end up addicted and actively refuse help.
I don't think throwing people in jail will fix the problem but Portugal isn't a haven where drug addiction is a thing of the past.
The verdict is a step forward for everyone. Abuse can happen to anyone regardless of age, gender, or wealth. This case has just set us in the right direction.
If there is a Mount Rushmore for LIARS, the top 3 would be Christine Blasey Ford, Jussie Smollett and Amber Heard.
@@YourSweetPotato I mean, trump told at least one lie for every day while in office, so he's probably worst that Amber.
She's still a lying abuser though, ruining it for actual victims of domestic violence.
I agree with the statement but it Actually is a major step back for women as every-time a women lies in cases like this it gives people more of a reason to not believe real victims. People are going to refer to women in future abuse cases as “ambers” Unfortunately
@@funknownxxx2365 I don't necessarily agree. I would say the common assumption before this case is that women won abuse cases whether they lied or not. But this case, while showing yes that men can be victims, it more importantly shows that Truth wins. It's not as much about him being a male that matters, it's that the truth overcame lies. Victims from all genders should see this as a win.
@@jamesmontgomery3818 I never said I didn’t see it as a win I’ve been team Johnny, I’m just saying that it stings a little extra as a women when someone lies about that. I love that shes being held to her actions I definitely see it as a win
She said "despite the mountain of evidence", seriously WHAT EVIDENCE. If she had mountains of evidence, she probably would've won.
Amber lied in the stand like a dozen times, including claiming two images that were clearly the same were different. Anyone who watched the trial knows that there was no way it would rule in her favour.
A note, her one counter claim that won was against his lawyer, not him.
Actually it was against johnny as the jury found the lawyer to be acting on behalf or as an "agent" of his. Still, a massive w for him
No, it was against Johnny because the jury found that his lawyer was working as his "agent" and therefor was speaking for Johnny. Not saying I agree with it, but that is how it works.
That was obviously a compromise. There must have been a juror that believed Amber at least somewhat so they threw her a win. That lawyer started it all and he deserves a fruit basket from Depp
I might be missing something here, but from what I understood of the counter claim was that because the lawyer was acting as a spokesperson on Johnny Depp's behalf, that would technically make Depp responsible for the defamation claim she had against him. I, however, am not a lawyer, so I fully acknowledge that I could be wrong, maybe someone could explain that to me?
@@valerierodger7700 Specifically about having other people work with her as well.
I keep seeing headlines implying it was a mutual win, and people misinterpreting the actual outcome. The jury found that Amber lied about being abused to ruin Johnny, straight up. There is no honest way to both-sides the outcome. Amber's 2 million, "win," is for a specific claim about a specific night, and was largely unrelated to any abuse claims.
Johnny cannot ever get true justice for the abuse he suffered, but he has finally gotten some vindication from the lies Amber spread after spending years tormenting him.
Yup, Amber's "win" is just because Waldman accused her of staging a scene to frame Depp. None of the other statements about her lying.
The jury found that Amber lied on ALL counts.
100% but, these are probably the same people/outlets that tout, "AH won the UK trial," which she didn't. She wasn't a party to that trial, and the grounds for which the UK publication won were very different from how defamation works in the US...but, misinformation in headlines gets more clicks 🙄
@@Amarianee even AH herself is still gaslighting the public, saying SHE and "her side" "won" the case in the UK! Like her statement.... just wow. What a lying pos!
She only "won" that one part today bc of the way he wrote it, saying the place had wine spilled and was trashed BEFORE the 2nd set of police came, which isn't true.... bodycam shows otherwise. They only did that (the wine ans trashing the place) AFTER the police (both sets) left and before Isaac came over - for photo "evidence"... ugh. I can't with that woman and her sleezy, freeloading "friends" ... who either dumped her, probably partly bc she was toxic with them too, once their free ride was over.... or they lied about not being friends anymore in order to get a cut of that 100mil she really thought she could manipulate her way to getting (I personally believe it was the former).
I'd assumed Depp was guilty for years because of Heard's and many other articles. After seeing everything this trial laid bare I'm so sad I assumed all that time. I don't know how anyone could see the trial in its entirety and think she had any proof. I found the most damning evidence against Johnny's character were some texts I found disgusting, only to find out after the fact that the texts were provably, not from him. So falsified evidence. Even that famous cabinet video everyone brings up, I've seen people act like that. A mental breakdown in the privacy of your home where you aren't hurting anyone, foolishly and impotently slamming some cabinets while your spouse mocks and films you, laughing at the end? And people say that's evidence of HIS capacity for abuse? The fucking nerve of that mentality. If the roles were reversed everyone, including me would only of needed to hear that one clip, "I didn't punch you- I was hitting you!" and that would have been enough. but in the end we got so much more. And after hearing and seeing it all I can tell He's a flawed person, but guess what? All victims are flawed, real people. And they still don't deserve it. Can't wait for a new Depp movie, it has been a while.
I was also in the camp that gave her the benefit of the doubt years ago (because who tf lies about that?) but after all the evidence in this case, I 100% believe any abuse she may have endured was reactive and she was the primary aggressor. Her own words and photos are what did her in imo.
I don't exactly blame people that choose to believe Amber Heard, because the video of Johnny "assaulting the cabinets" can be triggering for people that have been through abuse themselves. This behaviour can be considered an intimidation tactic in a certain context, and I understand that some people are traumatised to a point where they are not willing to look at the possibility that Johnny might be innocent. It is without doubt ignorant to just overlook how Amber confidently says she was hitting Johnny and see how she really was putting on a show in court and tried to get an emotional reaction from the jury rather than trying to recall the memories she had from her marriage. I understand that some people just don't want to open up to the possibility that the woman whose story of abuse inspired them and made them feel like they relate to this woman and that they share a traumatic experience with that woman, would actually be the woman that stabbed them in the back. What I don't understand is the media outlets that are biased against Depp and only present Amber's side of the story, what the hell is that about? I don't understand that DV directed at men is not a cause worth discussing in certain media outlets, I don't get it.
In future please don't let a woman's word alone completely condemn a person in your eyes. Everyone lies, women included. Johnny should be able to sue anyone who spread this malicious lie now, people's lives were ruined, he was powerless to do anything about it and he's Johnny fucking Depp, what chance does John Doe have? Absolutely no fucking chance, until society chances. Which I hope this is the beginning of that change! 😊
I believed her for about a year (and I was a hardcore Johnny Depp fan too) until that CZcamsr Incredibly Average began discussing her evidence in detail, and it was through him that heard all of that damning audio. It seemed like a lot of Amber's evidence was a picture of Johnny sleeping in an embarrassing position with drugs near him. That ice cream one was so wrong of her. And to say that was evidence of him being an abuser. Jesus Christ.
@@corneliahanimann2173 About the media outlets, I feel you. I was getting recommended some Inside Edition videos and one was like, "Look at Amber Heard acting like a mother despite the trial" like Johnny didn't raise two kids.
If anyone set things back for women it's Heard, her lies may effect how people view women who come forward with ACTUAL abuse, truly selfish and shameful.
Idk, I would say most people have common sense and will see through Amber's bullshit, but I will also say that I did notice a lot of people online really taking the opportunity to pile it all onto women as a whole because Amber was the obvious abuser in this case...
@@corneliahanimann2173 you're not wrong, most people aren't going to think that way, but there will be some. I didn't mean to imply that she completely discredited all female abuse victims, but between the two of them she definitely did more harm, it's just hypocritical.
I didn't think you implied that 😊
I just figured I've seen so many comments that are agressive towards Amber Heard and unsympathetic towards people that believe her. I know I don't believe her, but as someone who has experienced DV, I feel like the video of Johnny assaulting the cabinets can be triggering, because that's also similar to the behaviour of an abuser that is using intimidation tactics to silence you. We know now that Johnny wasn't having that reaction because he was trying to intimidate Amber, but was having a understandably bad reaction to another event in his life, but I can see how some survivors watch this and choose to never look the other way because they are beyond fed up with abusers getting away with abuse in their own lives.
I just decided to respond to you, because you seem reasonable and approachable.
I remember that in another comment section someone sais that they are so enrsged by Ambers Lawyer, that they would like to beat them up.
I commented there, that that's backwards, I'm sure we're all enraged at Amber because she abused Johnny, so how is it a reasonable to express your desire to beat up her lawyer who is literally just doing their job?
The fact that someone said that Amber had so much evidence yet we didn’t believe her only just exemplifies the real message of this trial. No matter how much evidence you have some people will never believe that a man has been domestically abused.
Rather that women still won't be believed. That is the true fallacy.
Honestly that saying was true but amber heard is not a great example
Truly a sad truth. 😓
@@juliettexox9311 Amber WAS believed at first though. Johnny lost everything when she came out with the accusations. He just had PROOF she was lying. And she had NONE. Well she had no evidence that wasn’t staged.
she had no evidence that wasn't an edited photo, yet another heard supporter who didn't watch the trial or ALL the evidence
There's a first time for everything, and I finally get to say it. Mr. deFranco, you are dead wrong when it comes to Portugal decriminalising drugs. It was a huge success (together with giving those who want it treatment, including methadone), we went from being by far the country with the most deaths by overdose per 100k in Europe to one of least. We, and it really is mostly unanimous, are very happy with that decision and are sticking with it.
It really is a shame that Portugal took such a monumental step forward over 20 years ago and proved that decriminalization was more effective than any other tested approaches, and the rest of the world reacted like ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Congratulations! I am very happy to hear that it was successful!
I try to use Portugal as the stellar example that it is, as often as I can. The real kick in the pants is when I tell people that an entire country made it safe and legal to use hard drugs. They try to downplay it like its just some tiny little community who's running some "crazy dangerous experiment".
The war on drugs has done enough damage to this world. Thank you Portugal for refusing to take part in the lunacy.
I stand for drugs legalization too, I’m so happy for Portugal.
@@gordonlove5121 I believe they're speaking about the specific statement from Phil which said something along the lines of "mixed results" coming from the decriminalization of hard drugs in Portugal.
This person disagrees, meaning they didn't think it had mixed results, they think it had very positive results.
Awesome video man ! So happy to announce that I have gained financial freedom by investing in digital currency. Now I know that multi creation of various streams of income is the ideal Principle for financial sustainability.
I have secured financial freedom by investing in bonds, equities, NFT's and crypto currency the most profiting of them all..
I got 70% of my total portfolio in crypto and I have been making good profits.
@@limzah4121 I wanted to invest more in crypto, but the fluctuations in crypto value discouraged me into dumping.
@@lvie6992 Crypto trading is the best investment anyone could get into. As it could make you rich in a blink of an eye, trading with an expert is the only key to successful trading
@@limzah4121 Exactly which is why I will always recommend Expert Chen R Zhang to all Newbies/greenhorn interested in making bigger profits on crypto. He is reliable and profitable
Thank you for using my tweet 😊
Johnny got the justice he most definitely deserved. I’m a survivor and Amber is definitely not my voice, or my advocate. He told the world, a judge and jury that he was a victim and we all heard and we believe him. The reason she has “evidence” of it is because she faked it and fabricated everything or staged things, it was obvious. The audio recordings don’t lie. We love Johnny
Everyone who says Amber had more evidence is oblivious, there's literally a recording of her saying things like; I was hitting you, you're such a baby and way way more
Then she said “tell the world Johnny, tell them you where a victim etc “ and thennnnn she said “let’s see who’s word they believed “ … she was done after that… smh
And the evidence she showed was unmatching and inconsistent with her testimony anyways.
Yeah people siding with amber simply haven’t been watching this trial. I cannot fathom someone seeing everything that happened and come to the conclusion that she was not guilty
No, she had evidence, most of it was doctored. I mean I lost count arount 78
they don't care, they will support her because she is a woman and support her unconditionally
I’ve been working remotely-for a company whose workforce is entirely distributed-since 2014, and full-time since 2017. If there’s one piece of wisdom I’m not sure that Mr. Musk understands, it’s this: If you think your workers are “pretending to work” while working from home, they were probably pretending to work at the office, too.
100% Aly….they are just doing what they do in or out of the office.
I worked from home during the pandemic and I would honestly get through at least twice as much of the computer based work than what I would do at work. At work I would be chatting with colleagues spending longer to go to my break or use the bathroom, get up just to wonder round because I was bored but in the comfort of my own house I was much more focused which made it laughable when they said that I couldn’t work from home and would have to go off sick because I then took a week off and they had to call me back because the extra 2 people they pulled off another area to cover me couldn’t manage my workload of what I was doing at home
I was just about to say this. When I was in the office I always used to either sneak being on my phone, chat with my co-workers or just get up.
This.
This is what I dont get. People still will be non productive in office. All it changes is how we spend that time. In office we go "use the restroom" to check social media or get away from our desk, or just browse it at our desk. At home one may take a nap and become well rested, do a load of laundry or anything more useful then wasting time at an office lol.
He should have said “mountain of edited evidence” don’t think she had a single piece of evidence or witness to it that was legit. Her refusing to answer questions and her magically disappearing bruises is what sealed the deal. Funny how she “forgot” to take pictures of the really big stuff she accused him of. Such bs an big dub for all the falsely accused men in the world that have to deal with this bs.
Exactly, anyone who actually paid attention to the trial could see what was happening, she fell over lie after lie and was constantly changing details in her stories. How she's not getting done for perjury is beyond me and I'm not even a fan of Depp.
@@9colm6 honestly it’s just pity at this point. Perjury would be twisting the knife. Although it would be a fitting punishment for her, I think anymore would make more people side with her. It’s really annoying seeing how people rush to defend her cuz they “feel bad” but I’m sure if it was their father, brother, or son going through what Johnny had to go through they wouldn’t be so quick to white knight for her online.
Hi Phil. I love your take on remote work, and work in general. I work as a programmer in the games industry and every day my focus is on the tasks I have set for that day. Since working from home I have felt happier, more comfortable, and far more productive away from a noisy atmosphere and all that small talk. Sadly most companies seem to be pushing people back into offices, but I'm thankful to have had over 2 years not having to work in an office, something that seemed impossible in 2019!
This whole anti-work from home sentiment really just screams entitlement and ableism. When I was in college, I had to take an entire year off for surgeries, and was told that online classes were not an option for me. Now, a few years later its becoming acceptable which is awesome. The whole concept of people 'not wanting to go to work' is just thinly veiled ableism, you don't want sick or disabled people at your company. You don't want to accommodate other people's needs here, and it really shows. You don't care if your employees are happy or healthy, you only care about the bottom line. And when the boss only cares about the bottom line, why would I put my health at risk for nothing in return?
How many disabled executives do you think work at Tesla? Its surely not the majority and that's a legit reason to work from home.
I don't even have a physical disability, but working from home really helped me with my mental disability. I worked more efficiently because I was being drained by forcing myself to accommodate soical norms in my life. I could put my engery into work and not trying to please co-workers by acting like them.
We already have a large wealth disparity in this country, imagine how much worse that gets if the "wealthy" don't even have to show up to work. Because that's how it will be seen. If someone has health issues, that's one thing, but otherwise that'll just breed even more classism and resentment.
i feel like in elons case its more fair since he himself said that he would look into it case by case for his executives if you are able bodied you should show up to work.
I felt this in my SOUL!!!! If the work gets done, what is the problem? Just because someone is sick or less able, doesn't mean they are less capable. We just need to be given the chance to show it
I’m a survivor of DV and I will say this is a WIN for all survivors. She tried to set women back and she lost with her lies. This was a win for those who have been abused. She’s clearly lied and been the aggressor in that situation.
I know right, the people supporting her are saying "even with all her evidence she still lost because of a rigged system"...what evidence. JD's teams has TONS of evidence she's an abuser, most of it created by her, she's got next to nothing about him being abusive.
It can't be understated that the jury found both guilty, which means they both lied (something Phillip Defranco even noted in the video because situations like this comment are happening where people are completely removing from their discussions Johnny Depp's part in the abusive relationship). To what degree is another story but this trial has shown that they were just a shit couple who couldn't take eachother. And anyone arguing x person had so much more evidence...it shouldn't matter the level of evidence. She could have had the same outcome with a much more favorable societal perception had she lied less or less dramatically.
@@Xershade I remember I saw once on Twitter her supporter said something like whoever go against Amber Heard is an incels for trying to bring down a woman and trying to cover up the fact that Johnny is the real abuser. it’s an insane take after all those evidence pointing towards Amber as the abuser.
@@d1vin1ty I think part of the reason they supported one of Heard's claims is so she can't call for a mistrial and try to file again
@@d1vin1ty not exactly, the 1 claim they found in favour for amber, was 1 specific incident. The police call. Everything else was found against her.
The problem with this verdict is that people allow it to establish their own bias. Not everyone's case is the same. This case showed me a woman who blatantly lied about what she was calling evidence against a man. While he also was shown to not be a good person through his own actions it did not support her claims of abuse. People should not use this verdict to assume who's right and wrong in another abuse case. Look at the evidence provided and use those to support your opinions, not unrelated scenarios.
It's incredibly frustrating that Amber Heard made herself the perfect poster child for the "false accusations are ruining men's lives" myth and then had the audacity to say the consequences of her actions were what hurt women.
As a disabled worker, the Elon musk story pisses me the hell off. Disabled workers have been asking for/needed the ability to work from home LONG before covid ever became a thing. It doesn’t take “extraordinary circumstances” to need that accommodation and \l for many people, not having the option to work remote means they simply can’t do that job. It’s complete bullshit.
I honestly didn't expect Johnny to win.
Not because he was lying, not because he didn't have the evidence, but because we are not used to men speaking out about being victims. This wasn't an instance where the "victim" was silenced, it was an instance of lies being dismantled in favour of the truth.
I am incredibly happy that Johnny won his case. I can only hope that his career is now able to recover.
Look at what happened to Terry Crews when he came out about his assault. He was made fun of. I’m glad JD won.
9⁹p
The sad part is, people wanted him to lose because "It will make victims fearful of speaking out against thier abusers". The problem with that logic is that it ignores that anybody can be a survivor of DV, regardless of thier gender. Wanting someone innocent to pay the price of a crime that they did not commit all in the name of "The greater good", isn't justice. I'm glad the jury saw this, & corrected the mistake that the media pushed forward. I hope it leads to further cases being reexamined. (Like the case of Vic Mignogna for example.)
@@Moots787 the ironic thing about their logic is that the entire case was a victim speaking out against their abuser.
Replying to save this thread for myself later
The fact that people could think Elon musk is the "cool" billionaire is irrefutable proof that we live in a buggy simulation
I think he is a cool billionaire, i dislike almost everything he makes but the shit he does on the side is cooler than other billionaires.
Dude, he's literally a sci-fi hero's rendition of a billionaire- planning ambitious missions to goddamn Mars, expanding fast network connectivity (aiding Ukraine), spearheading AI integration, some wacko side projects like underground city tunnels, hyperloop, f**king flamethrowers. He's the sci-fi nerd's dream realized. Idk about him being cool, but it's just cool that a person like him exists.
@@akhiltrc9708 is it a scifi nerd’s dream to intentionally run sweatshops to produce their tech? Because musk honestly sounds like a dystopian sci villain to me (a scifi nerd through and through)
@@cats1970 If you think that's the only thing that makes a villain, we're in very murky waters here. Is there ANY large firms that doesn't? Ik that's not the point here, but Elon is far from the worst, enf to make him cool. "Cool" in the sense he does the coolest stuff among all billionaires. At least he isn't virtue signaling like the rest of the rich fools.
@@akhiltrc9708 On the shallowest surface level yeah. But someone like him, focused on what he's focusing on, was inevitable. It just sucks that he's such in insufferable, sensitive, atrociously unfunny and hypocritical jerk.
What DOUBLY sucks is that people think he's a visionary for making a few good business decisions with the wealth of money he already had, then throwing that money at people smarter than him. He puts himself forward as the "relatable man of the people" by posting stale, unfunny, inflammatory memes while he runs sweatshops, busts unions and dodges taxes. He's so astronomically far from his average dick rider, he might as well already be on mars.
I am in 100% support of everyone watching the full trial before deciding the truth or what they think it’s the truth. That being said Amber heard made herself seem inherently untrustworthy when she justified domestic abuse by saying that she has slapped him she didn’t punch him. Everyone needs to hear this and believe this when we say that domestic violence is domestic violence. It doesn’t matter if he or she punched you or slapped you or threw something at you or anything like that. Abuse is abuse.
I have seen domestic abuse and some of the what was said is word for word what an abuser will say. It's honestly childish lying. I mean does it really even matter what kind of hit it was anyways? When people get defensive they always seem to latch onto anything even if it's a weak point.
I honestly have never met someone who thought Amber was telling the truth... She was proven to be lying about abuse... but she also lied where she didn't need to, which further discredited her...
I know one person who thinks they were both abusive. Besides that, the tapes really speak for themselves. She taped him to use it against him. But instead, they incriminated her.
Yes! A win for all men falsely accused and for all women who are pissed at other women who lie about being assaulted. As a survivor, these women ruin it for all of us. She is why people don't believe women OR MEN. I'm so glad that he didn't fall prey to that.
Women who lie are horrible monsters. All they do is make life harder for Legitimate victims.
Just because the jury believed him, doesn’t mean he was falsely accused l. Let’s remember she also won a divorce case against him and he lost a Libel case against a newspaper based on the same evidence.
@@kitpelican2 - it was proven in this trial that she perjured herself in the UK non-jury trial.
@@kitpelican2 Clearly it wasnt just the Jury
As a victim of DV and SA I found the verdict in Johnny's favor to be cathartic. All of us that have suffered abuse know first hand what it's like to be gaslit and treated in the way Amber did to Johnny. There is a reason so many are standing behind Johnny, and it's because we saw the truth very clearly. This was a win for what all of us have been saying. When an allegation comes forward we need to take it seriously and investigate, but we can't condemn a person off the hop or else it can ruin lives. Women like Amber who have used allegations to their benefit make it difficult for those of us struggling to get justice near impossible. Being a victim of SA and DV is not a badge to wear to help you get attention, it's a badge of solidarity with those has have experienced it to stand together.
Having a family member who is a drug user, it has caused so much pain for everyone who cares about him. It’s sad but the reality is he is safer and better off locked up. I can’t say it’s the case for everyone, I only have this one situation to speak on.
Being a man, that was in the same shoes as Johnny, I am very happy that the verdict was in his favour. Yes, men can be abused too.
I’m so sorry you’ve gone through that, I know how much that kind of abuse effects a person first hand.
She never presented any credible evidence to substantiate her claims. Obviously you shouldn’t dismiss claims of domestic abuse, but she was caught in several lies
This is why i never automatically believe anyone
@@NoBop2000 because of one person? yikes
re: the depp/heard trial, I'm honestly going to wait until someone does a complete retrospective of the whole thing before I make my opinion, but i hope they do it soon because I sure am tired that I'm a "bad woman" if I don't jump to depp's side. I hate that I'm expected to consume hours on hours of trial footage in an almost ghoulish way ("because you don't ignore an abuse victim, do you? you monster"), while the common narrative has been that, you know, fixating on criminal or trials featuring the private lives of others is pretty dang messed up. I'm tired that I'm expected to ignore how the first people to jump to depp's defense were people who could be incredibly toxic to women, and it almost felt like they were looking for a "justified" target. I'm supposed to ignore the long history of women being abused in the entertainment industry, and that rich or famous men can and do pressure those victims into silence. You have people on both sides claiming faked evidence. Everything in the reptilian hind-brain that can say "danger" does say "danger" about going along with the crowd... but at the same time it would be very much in line with the other horrible truth about things: that men are very much also victims of abuse, and their testimonies are equally valid.
I don't know if it's a *complete* retrospective, but Emily D Baker did retrospectives after each week of trial and deposition. It's six hours worth of video, but it's a heckuva lot better than the 40+ hours a week the rest of us went through for the past six weeks. She was one of the better "CZcams Lawyers Reacts", as she tried to give an impartial assessment of the attorneys and their approaches, not take sides or give hot-takes like a lot of the other Reacts did through all of this; so hopefully she gets across just why and how things went down in this. If you want to try and speed-run the full six weeks of trial, good luck. It's a lot of cringe, it's a lot of comedy, and it's a lot of heart-ache, but, most of all, it's a *lot*. For now, have the Abridged Version, and godspeed:
Week 1: czcams.com/video/lyyix66KLWg/video.html
Week 2: czcams.com/video/IVXqHCOWqDQ/video.html
Week 3: czcams.com/video/pjqLiQGLBFk/video.html
Week 4: czcams.com/video/Jn9gtgxbio4/video.html
Week 5: czcams.com/video/wTPiuShBezE/video.html
Week 6: czcams.com/video/6NdomtIB6-I/video.html
Check out Emily baker and legal bites. They break it down in a fair way.
@@bunnyrabbitshavehats I started there, but with each piece coming out as it happened instead of a full retrospective after everything was said and done, it didn't feel complete AND it felt ghoulish. Plus like Jason said above, that's still six hours.
Yes thank you! The amount of violent and blatant misogyny I've seen directed at heard these past weeks is deeply disturbing. If the abuser is a white man we hear some sob story to get us to empathize, but when its someone with a marginalized identity everyone's bigotry comes flooding in.
It feels like people are way too invested in these two individual's lives. None of us were there. Only JD and AH know the full story.
honestly regardless of the verdict, this trial proved to me that people don't actually know how trauma works. I've seen people make comments about the way Amber acted or Johnny did as evidence of them not being the victim. Meanwhile I or people i know LITERALLY BEHAVE IN THAT WAY. I would never come out with the things that have happened to me publicly if i ever somehow get famous because people don't have common sense. They think their trauma responses or their understanding of them are the only ones that matter. Also...they think victims are angels. Like even if they think either Heard or Depp are horrible outside of the whole DV thing, it doesn't change whether they are a victim if it is the case. People need realize that this is real life and not some fictional tv show
Disney needs to publically apologize for firing Johnny over a false accusation against him. They're so fast to put out statements supporting victims of injustice well Johnny is the ultimate victim!
Sadly, they wont do that. A corporation will continue onward and not bat an eyelash to it. In the past, corporations back people with worse crimes and allegations than JD. But, in the light of Times up and Me Too movements they wanna play nice and push people aside in the name of "woke" (which I despise that label). Sadly, even with this win, it's a long uphill battle to see equality level out. But, it's a start.
He was fired for his drinking
@@hellopeople1013 A court of law says otherwise buddy
bro they are literally an organisation, they hire and fire all the time, JD happened to be another big name that they didn't care about, was it unnecessary yeah but it's... disney it's a known and accepted fact that disney is not the best humanity has to offer
No they don’t. He’s ducking awful
To be honest I actually didn't expect the people on Amber's side to double down so hard on their bad takes after the verdict. She was literally caught lying with a mountain of evidence to back it up and people still think she's worth the praise and effort to defend online. It's almost as if this has nothing to do with claims/evidence at all but simply because she's a Woman.
Honestly I'm against all the hate she's getting and I'd just love it if she just disappears to live her own life far far away from Johnny. But it looks like she's hell bent on dragging this out even longer if she decides to appeal the verdict again...
Completely expected it. Amber was doubling down as the trial went on and so were her supporters. It's only reasonable to expect the outcome of the trial wouldn't change anything, except boosting their egos if they won.
Tbh she right. This gonna set women back like she said. Now the actual victims of dv are gonna hear "oh its another amber heard"
@@user-ys2qz6ji6t exactly, I fully expect it to become pretty commonplace to call a woman "an Amber Heard" when coming forward about her SA and DV - regardless of whether or not she's telling the truth or lying.
@@user-ys2qz6ji6t If she cared enough she should of thought about that before hand no?
They’re even more annoying now. Crying victim saying “it’s all over the internet don’t bring it *here*” referring to w/e fb/group chat they’re in that I’ve seen
I'm happy for Johnny and I think it was right. But I'm so very scared as a woman that this will make some men go "see, every woman *is* lying. " I hate that this is where we are as a society. The men vs women thing is exhausting.
Actually going forward it shows that some people even woman are disgusting enough to go up in court and fabricate and lie about abuse. This is a win for real abuse victims.
But those people would say that no matter what. It is not those sorta people that one can have a serious discussion with.
If anything, it will make somewhat rational people look at evidence BEFORE ruining the other persons life.
Woman aren’t the only abuse victims, sexist.
No one is going to say that who wouldn't have already said it before the trial.
This case set EVERYONE back. It's been publicized online and has attracted so much fighting and hate that it just made reporting and fighting against abuse so much harder, both for men and women.
I had a brother and a sister who were both victims of DV. I recognized the issues with my sister. I blew off, excused or didn't question so many of the signs that were clear with my brother. This case hopefully will open up the eyes of friends and families of males in a DV relationship.
Super happy with the verdict! Been following this since the Op-Ed was published and was concerned about Heard being the abuser. It was a fair trial, and if anybody thinks this is bad for women… remember that we have amazing women like Judge Azcarate, Dr Shannon Curry and Camille Vasquez on the case!
And domestic abuse turned in to a meme nation wide! Awesome!
@@SinfulSingers False domestic abuse was turned into a meme. Maybe that's also helpful because it will stop people from fabricating stuff if they don't want to become a meme like Amber.
@@Xershade I like making jokes about parts of the court case, but making domestic abuse-whether real or fake-is problematic as it opens the doors for certain people to overstep boundaries or cross lines onto real abuse. Sometimes real abuse situations can appear fake, sometimes fake abuse can appear real. I wouldn’t want the general public with no insight in specific cases to judge the reality of a case then proceed to joke about it after determining it is fake.
Face it-there’s a lot of dumb people on the Internet. Not everyone can be trusted to be correct as well as funny.
Make jokes about the dog stepping on a bee. Make jokes about a lawyer objecting to his own open-ended question. Make jokes about phrasings lawyers used like “mega pint of wine”. My stopping point is when someone makes jokes about the alleged “victim” getting beat tf up because regardless of how true the story is, it’s just hurtful and can be repeated to downplay people who actually are victims.
@@rynnmedia The victim is Johnny Depp.
@@ALulzyApprentice I agree? I used “victim” in quotation marks when referring to Amber Heard or any other alleged victim because that’s the claim. I wouldn’t make fun of Depp being abused, nor would I make fun of Heard. Regardless of truthfulness.
Domestic/Sexual abuse just isn’t funny. The case had funny moments, but details about abuse isn’t it.
Honestly ive been working remove for over 6 months now and I love it. As someone that's introverted, the thought of having to go into an office and deal with people on a day to day basis is exhausting.
Always been on team legalize it all. Regulate and tax the heck out of it. Release from prison every single non-violent drug charge and purge their records. Stop all private prisons and stop profiting from people going to jail.
To anyone who thinks Amber had mountains of evidence, what about all Jonny’s evidence, all the people and evidence, and Amber herself contradicting her own evidence ?
her evidence were just her taking pictures of herself after she used the bruise kit... literally had two same pictures with different saturation which were submitted by herself...like that's...dumb...
@@DevsRad265 don't forget the pictures of an old man sleeping on vacation lol
The text messages were evidence. She had some witnesses testify that could be considered evidence, although people may not have found those witnesses very credible. If people had believed her photos, those could be evidence. Unfortunately for her, there was evidence to contradict her witnesses and photos, leaving only Johnny's text messages.
I don't think she had any credible evidence pf physical abuse. If her lawyers had switched to hammering the point that he was emotionally abusive, she might not have lost the case. That's where the evidence could be convincing.
Mountains of evidence, no. And there was so much more evidence of her lying that it tainted all of her evidence. Even the evidence that was convincing was overshadowed by her lies and faking victimhood.
@@Andreamom001 Agreed. Most said this was an easy case for her to win. This was Amber's case to win, but it was also her case to lose, and lose she did. Also the audio didn't do her any favors, because the way she speaks to JD really comes off more as an abuser and manipulator than as a victim that fears for her life. There was not one moment that I ever believed Amber was afraid of Johnny.
I also just couldn't believe her on the stand. I felt no real emotion from her, and her alleged accounts of sexual and physical violence were just so over the top. The way she took photos and videos of everything that she deemed to be damaging to Johnny i don't believe that she wouldn't have taken pictures of the horrific injuries she sustained if they really happened. I'm all for believing those who speak up. In this case the victim who spoke up and whom I believe is Johnny.
She seemed to have capitalized on the #metoo movement, however generally when someone is an abuser and someone speaks up, many others come forward. No one else spoke up.
@@Andreamom001 imo the issues are he turned over all his damning text messages he sent venting to friends but she disobeyed the court order to do the same. Do we believe she had no incriminating texts?
She can’t escape that debt with bankruptcy, it isn’t dischargeable. He can garnish her wages until it is paid.
if she can’t find any wages after making a public fool of herself on the other hand…
It's going to be a long time before her wages from being unemployable pay out. 😂
also she still has the 7 million donation "pledge".
We all know Elon will be the one paying the bill, he covered all her legal fees. There is no way she could afford those lawyers... Even if they are bottom of the barrel
She can leave the country if she really wants to.
As someone with a long term illness working from home is wonderful. I'm on an inbound call line, so when things are slow being able to walk to my bookshelf is great, spending time with my dogs or getting a hug from my fiance on my break reduces stress throughout the day, and being able to use my own bathroom strangely enough is weirdly important to me now. I don't feel any less productive. I'm still taking the same amount of calls, checking the same amount of e-mails, and going to the same amount of coachings and meetings. I'm just more comfortable and don't have to deal with traffic or potentially get in an accident on my way to work. I'm never late. I don't understand people who think working from home is less efficient.
I’ve worked from home for two years now and it was the best thing that ever happened to me. I was legitimately looking for a new job before the pandemic because working in the office was wearing down my mental health. But now that I work from home my stress levels have dropped significantly and I can actually get work down because it’s quieter in my house than in the office and I don’t have supervisors hovering over my shoulder every half an hour to distract me. In fact, everyone loved working from home so much my office switched entirely to that model and shut down the office completely.
This DEFINITELY will set women back. Only because it showed how damn hard a man has to fight despite having red handed evidence. In addition, Amber straight up lied multiple times.
Amber Heard set women back, not Johnny Depp. And the sad thing is that she believes she's been victimized in some way, absolutely disgusting behaviour. She should take a class on accountability and be eliminated from any future acting roles.
The amount of damage she caused is insane.
I don't agree. I think, regardless of what your views on this case are, if you use it as an excuse to ignore domestic abuse or promote misogyny, that's on you. You can't say "but the movie star lady who was married to the funny pirate man MADE ME into a sexist, I didn't have a choice!".
I know that this isn't exactly what trying to say but I think it's important to hold people accountable for their shitty attitudes and beliefs and not pin the blame on someone else.
It’s so frustrating hearing her be like “i was doing this for other women, other abuse victims” when in reality she selfishly used their trauma to try and gain. Disgusting
It's like if Jussie Smollett would say that his verdict set back black people's rights...
@@TRICROTIC1 You haven't made the point you think you've made. Your argument is largely incoherent.
@@VincenzoInfi well, I am tired so that might happen.
Ambers actions are so damaging to actual survivors of abuse. It’s vile that she immediately doubled down and continues to play victim.
Did y’all miss the part where she actually won??? His was about defamation, she had to prove one instance of abuse… she proved multiples? He won 15 million for defamation, she won 2 million for proving instance of abuse. Why are y’all ignoring that?
@@mkwhite5054 Can I have some of what you're smoking? She won over something a lawyer of his said. Nice try on the spin 😂
@@munkustrap2 and he only won based upon defamation which means nothing about whether or not he actually abused her so let me get some of what YOU are smoking. The entire point of the claim Amber won was that her abuse allegations could not be called a hoax and had to be proven… which she did?
@@mkwhite5054 so um....by finding in his facor on all counts, the infernce is that amber lied about abusing him.
Amber won defimation on waldmen saying she and her friends faked evidence.
Big differnce
Johnny was absued
Walden mispoke and shouldnt have said they faked evidence.
Please get your facts straight
@@mkwhite5054 she on two million for defamation through the waldman statements that technically had nothing to do with dv lol
I work as a IT L2 support for a major car company's car configurator and sometimes we have as little as one or two hours of work per day. The company lets us to do whatever during those vacant hours. Our team usually fills them with learning how to code. We also got the budget from them for creating our own tools. Literally noone cares whether we do this from office or from home.
I am beyond grateful to be able to work from home. To not have to get dressed up, to feel freer to express myself in term of hair color and gender expression, and to be able to treat my chronic pain at home and my mental health with regular breaks that just replaced me sitting in the bathroom.
"Tell the world Johnny." And he did. No matter your colour, creed or identity, Johnny's win is a win for every single victim, and gives courage to the voiceless that someday they may be free too.
Not a win for victims because now many aren’t going to be believed because they both lied and are both abusers. That’s why his lawyer has to pay for saying her abuse from him was a hoax.
the lawyer has to pay for claiming that Amber and her friends tried to set him up. The jury said that that claim of defamation was in fact defamatory as the lawyer was claiming the sequence of events as a fact. The claims calling it an “abuse hoax” and claiming Amber and friends use their allegations as “fact” to publicly attack Depp, both of these claim the Jury did not find defamatory as they were worded as opinions while the first one was stated like a fact.
Victims DO have a hard time being believed, but Johnny Depp said he was the victim and they had audio of Amber daring him to come forward as a victim, belief a man would feel too ashamed to admit being a victim of abuse or that the world wouldn’t believe him because “women can’t be violent.” Men can be victims, women can be violent, we need to acknowledge these are facts while trying to help all victims of abuse find safety, Justice, and peace
Kristy Robinson the jury found her abuse allegations false so technically only amber was the abuser. The only thing he was fined for was his lawyers statements but it was a wash cause 15 million v 2 million. Johnny the actual victim won. So nah I’d say it’s a good day for real abuse victims.
As a HR manager I welcomed the remote working situation. We got away from hours worked being a measure of success and instead looked more at targets. If you hit targets why not have freedoms? Some people can work in short bursts of high productivity and exploiting that to put more work on them causes burnout so giving flexibility and target based work load proves you can trust people to do their best
I think this is something so many companies need to learn. Do you want great productivity, or do you want things your way? Cause you ain't getting both, so decide which is most important here.
As a high risk family my husband had to leave a job he loved to find 100% remote work so I am very glad it's becoming more common. Also it saves us a fortune in transportation costs and we have at least 2 full extra hours PER DAY to spend together as a family. Literally 14+ hours per week of family time we didn't have before and he is far more productive that he was in an office because people aren't constantly distracting him. It would have to be a really great opportunity for us to even consider a full time in office job for him ever again.
Thats a good standpoint, drug abuse is a health issue not a criminal issue. The actions you may take under the influence of drugs however are a criminal issue just like drunk driving or public intoxication.
I really want to see the people that support Amber bring the evidence, there was literally a ton of evidence against her.
She said she had all this evidence but where was it. What she did have never matched her testimony
@@danielledaniel1900 Guess she didn’t finish changing the filters on more pics 🙄
I’d like to see them try and find and explain Amber’s “evidence “
She pledged to bring lots of evidence.
@@danielledaniel1900 and at the same time, they literally blocked evidence against 'em! like...
"Crunch is not a triumph of the workforce, but a failure of the management."
- James Stephanie Sterling
I stopped following her when she got less about how her views applied to the gaming sphere and more raging about everything, as though we didn't have the critical thinking to apply the ideas to other places, but she's right on a lot of things.
@@leadpaintchips9461 Yeah I get where you are coming from, except the "gaming sphere" is indicative of everything, especially capitalism and politics in general. If you are a hardcore gamer who only cares about games and doesn't care about how and why the sausage is made in a certain way, then you probably won't want to hear a lot of what she says. That being said, the quote I posted is interesting because certain people like to romanticise the idea of burning the candle at both ends. It's an ideology I find... problematic at best and disgusting at worst.
Edit: I don't think I got the pronouns correct. I think it should be "they" but honestly I am not educated enough on the subject to get it right. Please excuse my ignorance if I am incorrect.
@@IAmFromTheYear About the pronouns, from the last that I watched her she considered herself a she but wasn't going to be bent out of shape if someone slipped up accidently.
I understand that all the things that she was talking about applied to the wider world, but her channel was a gaming channel. She billed it as a gaming channel. She left talking about gaming on her rants about the rest of it. Hell, I can't even think 'AAA' without thinking it how she says it, with the contempt and distain. Her covering 'how the sausage is made' in the video game industry is now why I look behind the scenes whenever I can and that influences my purchasing decisions across the board.
I watched her for her coverage of the video game industry though. She really stopped critiquing the video game industry and just used her channel to voice her political and economic decisions after her coming out.
@@leadpaintchips9461 I think her primary focus is still the gaming industry but fair enough. It's kinda sad how many people unsubscribed after she came out though. Would you agree?
@@leadpaintchips9461 That's actually the only correct pronunciation of "AAA." Especially when the "AAA" games in question are hot garbage made under shitty working conditions by misogynists (coincidentally also for misogynists).
This is one of the best PDS episodes I have seen and I've been watching for over a decade. Great job Phil, keep it up.
I somehow completely forgot this show existed and today it popped up in my feed after 4 years.
Philly D still doing his thing. Props to you dude.
I live in Canada, and I lost my cousin last year to an accidental overdose of fentanyl in BC. He was 6 days older than me and we would have been 40 this year, it's still hurts to think about. Nobody's perfect, we all have our vices and we don't deserve to die for our mistakes.
I’m sorry for your loss. It’s difficult to see a loved one struggle and lose to their addiction
Agreed. I lost my youngest brother and one of my cousin's kids to overdoses a month apart back in 2018. They were 25 and 23.
@@Nevertoleave I had no idea it was that bad, if I did I would have tried to help, to whatever end.
@@JennaGetsCreative It's not easy, I know. A few years earlier I lost an uncle I only met once at my grandfather's funeral about a decade earlier, incarcerated for drugs most of my life, and died on parole.
@@TalentlessCooking I know how you feel. We lost my sister in law last week because of the damage of alcoholism. She lead able to hide it for a long time and how bad it was. Even though she had been sober for the last few years her body wasn’t able to recover from an infection after a sudden surgery. I know we all wish it had been discovered sooner, that we could have helped her sooner, and maybe she would still be with us
As someone from BC, drugs have been unofficially decriminalized for years. Police officers dont arrest you for personal possession and havent for quite some time. This is confirming and it opens the door for actual treatment and hopefully better consuming sights within BC. Its def a huge step for out province and will hopefully further harm reduction efforts!
I'd just hope those who profit off of addicts are punished somehow because personally that seems like a sort of twisted thing to do
Users should have all the help they can get and I'd hope more medical facilities would be open to programs to help addicts
If she had shown the mountains of evidence she claims to have (but claims her lawyers didn’t use it?? Strange) then the outcome would have been different. She just wasn’t able to backup anything she said.
@@Beatriz_MS that’s what I said - she wasn’t able to back up any of her claims 🤷♀️ if there’s an appeal and they allow in the extra evidence they claim they weren’t allowed enter in then maybe things will be different, but it depends on the judge first to even open that door for more 🙈
People’s reactions to the verdict in taking side with Amber Heard… is making me lose faith in humanity
Amber Heard's statement was so insulting to actual abuse victims like myself. She is an abusive, horrible person. I'm a woman, and SHE is the biggest set back for women like myself who are victims of abuse
That you are still able to see that with such clarity despite your own past says a great deal about your strength of character. All the best for you going forward.
@@PlywoodDavid facts
The thing that bothers me about Amber stands talking about Amber's "mountain" of evidence, what they refuse to include is that this woman "documented" everything, literally everything EXCEPT her injuries. If she was in fear of him finding them, why did she have embarassing images of him she shared with her friends? She and her lawyers are lucky they aren't facing perjury and sanctions for the dirty tricks and image fraud they perpetuated in this case. She lost because she lied, repeatedly and provably. She's an abuser who will never admit her crimes and she'll make a throne of legitimate survivors to salve her endless ego. She's the one who damaged survivors, like the abuser she's always been.
Just wait, it’s still too early she still has Australia to deal with cause of her smuggling her dogs into their country and the UK might go after her cause of this verdict.
She also didn't document him doing drugs. She had photos of him sleeping and photos of drugs, but no photos of him in possession of drugs or him doing drugs.
Also that she is a proven liar and misrepresented a lot of the key "evidence". While that doesn't mean she lied about everything, it does mean that her testimony is basically garbage unless an independent source can back it up.
The thing a lot of people are also missing is that if she had stuck to claiming that she was verbally and emotionally abused, she likely would have won her case. There is proof of that happening. The problem is that she insisted on absolutely trashing him with dubious claims of ongoing and vicious physical and sexual abuse for which she not only lacked evidence, but in several cases there was evidence that strongly suggested these things hadn't happened. She sunk herself.
@@annme_87 I mean, he was pretty open about his drug use. He just argued that outside of the opiates he detoxed from it wasn't a problem.
@@Lynsey17 let's not forget HER drug/substance abuse issues... and Johnny is sober now that he's away from her... also those who know him say his substance abuse issues got MUCH WORSE after Rum Diaries (when they met and started a relationship). At least Johnny owns his issues unlike someone else... 🙄
I have a law degree and I watched the whole trial, and Heard had no substantial evidence. Just testimony from friends who abused Depp’s generosity and inconclusive photos none of which showed bruising or injury consistent with the brutality she testified too. Worse yet, many of those photos were duplicates and all of which showed evidence of potential tampering. Her own testimony was nearly identical to numerous stories in literature and pop-culture, sometimes verbatim. She delivered horrifying tales with exasperated speech unaccompanied by a single tear. The moments of emotional spectacle were proven false with her quick transitions to calm with every objection or interruption. She presented no medical records that supported her claims, despite having the means to do so, and no other physical evidence. To say that she had more evidence than most victims, I believe, is a grossly inaccurate statement.
This not a situation of a woman being silenced by a court of law, this is a situation of a vile and manipulative person being stopped from using the traumas of countless women, so many of which are our own loved ones, to serve her own ego and selfish purposes. Abuse knows no gender, but obviously women suffer disproportionately, and for Amber heard to abuse that fact, is beyond evil.
I have friends and family who have suffered abuse and domestic violence, male and female, and this is a win for them. Johnny Depp is far from perfect but he did not deserved to be treated this way by Heard or the media.
So funny how media outlets are turning on Elon Musk.....he even called it!
I just wish the Depp/Heard case hadn't become such a meme. It feels gross seeing people joke about it the way they have been when it was a very serious case with serious accusations.
You can joke about something while also having serious thoughts and feelings about it. Personally I loved the #AmberTurd hashtag, but I still watched/listened to the trial everyday
People don't care about men's well being, the only reason this got any attention was cause it's johnny Depp. Guarantee you after all this dies down we'll be back at the status quo.
@@CRAgamer Speak for yourself. Most people care about men just as much as anyone else.
@@SuperiorFirepower Oh I agree that both can be true! But I would bet money that most of the people making jokes about the situation cared very little about the actual substance of the case. Lots of people were just cashing in because it was trendy to make jokes about it.
@@CRAgamer I really wished that this could become something better and shine a better light on male victims of domestic abuse but you're probably right and it's sad.
No one who actually watched the trial could possibly be upset by its outcome.
If you still believe Amber Heard, you did not watch the trial. Period.
I'm upset she got anything. Also upset we don't like by Dokapon rules when you lose a fight. Would have loved for JD to change her name to Amber Turd.
@@Xershade she only got something that had nothing to do with her allegations. And the only reason her didn't get the full 50 mill because he couldn't prove that he lost his role because of the allegations. Which is totally up to Disney to say yes or no regardless of the truth.
@@Xershade her getting anything was kind of a shock to me because what was written in the article about her that she won for was not said by Johnny it was said by his attorney on his own not speaking for Johnny. Him being punished for what someone else said in their own is crazy to me.
@@branniedens3480 She only won because they didn't have the evidence the internet has, we know the second phone call was made.
@@shannonhensley2942 That and it's not like the ship has already sailed on Pirates 6 either. With Depp having been vindicated by this trial I think the most like thing stopping him from being in another Pirates movie going forward s him having animosity with Disney for siding with his abuser. That and the logistical nightmare of finding over a million Alpacas.
I work from home. It’s both the best and worst thing 😂
I love working from home. There is no lack in productivity in working from home for me. I can see how in some cases it would need to be monitored if the employees need more supervision.
I think that Amber Heard's response to the verdict shows once more just how disconnected she is from all of this.
This was not a setback for women. This was a big step forward for abuse victims, women and men alike. To show that abusers who lie and weaponize, pass the blame, and gate-keep the truth can be held responsible. And that victims can find justice. The proudest I could be after all this is if Johnny Depp payed Amber's 2mil out of pocket and donated all $10,350,000 to the victims of domestic abuse!
Thank you for having the accurate $$ amount.
Wasn’t he awarded 15 million? 10 million for compensation and 5 million for punitive charges
@@kevinprzy4539 Yes, but the state where the lawsuit has taken place has a cap of $350,000 for punitive damages. The jury, likely aware of this, gave him a ruling for much more than this as a symbolic gesture. They were saying that he deserved much more for the wrong that was done, even if it is not legal to give it. The 10mil for compensation, however, is all his as far as I'm aware.
@@QuixoteBadger ahhh ok, thx for letting me know
@@kevinprzy4539 there's a cap of 350k for punitive damages.
Musk is such a caricature. Whenever he gets on his soapbox about hard work, it feels like that time Kim Kardashian complained about societal laziness. For a man who seems to spend half his day feverishly googling his own name and the other half arguing with Twitter randos, he sure seems to love to treat his staff just as badly as his father treated his diamond miners. But go off, king.
*child-slave* diamond miners; let's not have that important fact slip through the cracks.
I am so happy you covered the last story. I did send a text about it on the text line you may not have even seen it but gave me so much info more than I already had.