Holographic Principle Explained | Sean Carroll and Lex Fridman
Vložit
- čas přidán 22. 04. 2024
- Lex Fridman Podcast full episode: • Sean Carroll: General ...
Please support this podcast by checking out our sponsors:
- HiddenLayer: hiddenlayer.com/lex
- Cloaked: cloaked.com/lex and use code LexPod to get 25% off
- Notion: notion.com/lex
- Shopify: shopify.com/lex to get $1 per month trial
- NetSuite: netsuite.com/lex to get free product tour
GUEST BIO:
Sean Carroll is a theoretical physicist, author, and host of Mindscape podcast.
PODCAST INFO:
Podcast website: lexfridman.com/podcast
Apple Podcasts: apple.co/2lwqZIr
Spotify: spoti.fi/2nEwCF8
RSS: lexfridman.com/feed/podcast/
Full episodes playlist: • Lex Fridman Podcast
Clips playlist: • Lex Fridman Podcast Clips
SOCIAL:
- Twitter: / lexfridman
- LinkedIn: / lexfridman
- Facebook: / lexfridman
- Instagram: / lexfridman
- Medium: / lexfridman
- Reddit: / lexfridman
- Support on Patreon: / lexfridman - Věda a technologie
Full podcast episode: czcams.com/video/tdv7r2JSokI/video.html
Lex Fridman podcast channel: czcams.com/users/lexfridman
Guest bio: Sean Carroll is a theoretical physicist, author, and host of Mindscape podcast.
As Dr Sabine Hossenfelder said, this is bunk science. There is nothing about this theory that can be proven and most of it is based on theories that are also not proven. This falls under "Popular science" and is created to make money via selling books, not advance actual science.
your opinion on nassim harmein papers?
Look sheeple. Just because Steven didn't have an answer. Doesn't mean The answer you got was the correct one.
Information is duplicated nearly an infinite amount of times. No information is lost. Ever.!
Information can be erased. Deleted. Removed. And or neutralized.
But no information will ever be gone. Due to the fact that there is so many replicated functions of it.
Mini copies of all information exist literally everywhere.
So if information that leaves this universe. Might as well be completely destroyed.
It's still exists here in this universe. In an almost innumerable amount.
However. Just because information has left this universe. For all intense purposes. Doesn't mean it no longer exists.
Since from an external observer view. Black holes will actually last an infinitely long time.
Longer than the life of the universe itself.
So no information will ever be lost. However.
If in fact if the length of the universe somehow outlasted the last black holes.
For the "Annihilation" process to occur.
(NOT "EVAPORATION".!
I'M SORRY I EVER COINED THE TERM. People picked that one up immediately.
I think because it's descriptive for the process. Except for that's not the process.!)
Steven's first interpretation of the process is the correct one and or process.
Not the excuse for people who could not wrap their head around it.
Which to be fair. Neither could Steven. That we know of.
But I can.!
Sure Sure.! Maybe I'm a crazy person.?
The thing is. Our biggest problem is what we think we already know. And we Do Not.
Well the vast majority does not.
I only spend my whole life all day everyday studying and contemplating these functions.
So it is possible as a human I am fooling myself.
But so too would reality be.
Because if these concepts were actually just my own hallucinations.
They would not corroborate with observations calculations and reality.
And they certainly DO.!
So I just keep following them. leaving most current scientific theories and what are thought to be facts. Further and further behind.
Imagine what we could do if we work together.
But to be honest. I don't think humanity is ready for what I have discovered.
We are in irresponsible species. But the thing is. I think that's where we really learn. When the rubber meet's the road.
Wear necessity meets invention.
Sure. It's possible I'm incorrect.
But if I am. The scientific community is in bigger trouble than we thought. So let us hope for all our sakes that I am correct.
Or rather that Steven's 1st hypothesis is the correct one. And not his 2nd answer for the Sheeple.!
You know ironically. Einstein had the exact same problem.
Because he gave a 2D example of a 3D process.
People actually assume that Space is curved.!!!
And that couldn't be further from the truth.!
It is the gradient the quantum procession follows. And this includes light.
I mean you can think of it as a curvature. But it's not of space. space is a real thing. And everything that exists. exists in it. And that's not to say that it actually cannot be curved. but you should also immediately realize. that that curvature has nothing to do with the function of Gravity. well not nothing. but certainly not a direct correlation. As it is currently thought by the scientific community. AND IT IS NOT.!!!
See the trouble you get into. When you do not properly describe concepts.!
Sometimes you just cannot dumb it down.
And if one does not have the capability to comprehend those concepts.
I suppose you can try the simpler version. And then add the real version. For an easier understanding.
I mean that's kind of how I got there.
But I had additional information to lead me in the direction of reality.
And apparently everyone I know of. Who has ever heard the 2D version. seems to just immediately accept it.
And if we lived in a 2D universe. They would be right.
However we don't live in a 2D universe. We live in a universe with a minimal 3 dimensions.
If you don't count time as a dimension. Which I do not.
Time is simply the result of interactions between dimensions.
Time. Is an emergent property of the universe. That is why you can have Space with no Time.! But you canNot have Time with no Space.!
Anywho. I realize I probably raised more questions than I have answered.
But recognize. While All information will always persist within the universe.
That doesn't mean it can't be destroyed.
I hope you found this info in lightning. 🍻
Look sheeple. Just because Steven didn't have an answer. Doesn't mean The answer you got was the correct one.
Information is duplicated nearly an infinite amount of times. No information is lost. Ever.!
Information can be erased. Deleted. Removed. And or neutralized.
But no information will ever be gone. Due to the fact that there is so many replicated functions of it.
Mini copies of all information exist literally everywhere.
So if information that leaves this universe. Might as well be completely destroyed.
It's still exists here in this universe. In an almost innumerable amount.
However. Just because information has left this universe. For all intense purposes. Doesn't mean it no longer exists.
Since from an external observer view. Black holes will actually last an infinitely long time.
Longer than the life of the universe itself.
So no information will ever be lost. However.
If in fact if the length of the universe somehow outlasted the last black holes.
For the "Annihilation" process to occur.
(NOT "EVAPORATION".!
I'M SORRY I EVER COINED THE TERM. People picked that one up immediately.
I think because it's descriptive for the process. Except for that's not the process.!)
Steven's first interpretation of the process is the correct one and or process.
Not the excuse for people who could not wrap their head around it.
Which to be fair. Neither could Steven. That we know of.
But I can.!
Sure Sure.! Maybe I'm a crazy person.?
The thing is. Our biggest problem is what we think we already know. And we Do Not.
Well the vast majority does not.
I only spend my whole life all day everyday studying and contemplating these functions.
So it is possible as a human I am fooling myself.
But so too would reality be.
Because if these concepts were actually just my own hallucinations.
They would not corroborate with observations calculations and reality.
And they certainly DO.!
So I just keep following them. leaving most current scientific theories and what are thought to be facts. Further and further behind.
Imagine what we could do if we work together.
But to be honest. I don't think humanity is ready for what I have discovered.
We are in irresponsible species. But the thing is. I think that's where we really learn. When the rubber meet's the road.
Wear necessity meets invention.
Sure. It's possible I'm incorrect.
But if I am. The scientific community is in bigger trouble than we thought. So let us hope for all our sakes that I am correct.
Or rather that Steven's 1st hypothesis is the correct one. And not his 2nd answer for the Sheeple.!
You know ironically. Einstein had the exact same problem.
Because he gave a 2D example of a 3D process.
People actually assume that Space is curved.!!!
And that couldn't be further from the truth.!
It is the gradient the quantum procession follows. And this includes light.
I mean you can think of it as a curvature. But it's not of space. space is a real thing. And everything that exists. exists in it. And that's not to say that it actually cannot be curved. but you should also immediately realize. that that curvature has nothing to do with the function of Gravity. well not nothing. but certainly not a direct correlation. As it is currently thought by the scientific community. AND IT IS NOT.!!!
See the trouble you get into. When you do not properly describe concepts.!
Sometimes you just cannot dumb it down.
And if one does not have the capability to comprehend those concepts.
I suppose you can try the simpler version. And then add the real version. For an easier understanding.
I mean that's kind of how I got there.
But I had additional information to lead me in the direction of reality.
And apparently everyone I know of. Who has ever heard the 2D version. seems to just immediately accept it.
And if we lived in a 2D universe. They would be right.
However we don't live in a 2D universe. We live in a universe with a minimal 3 dimensions.
If you don't count time as a dimension. Which I do not.
Time is simply the result of interactions between dimensions.
Time. Is an emergent property of the universe. That is why you can have Space with no Time.! But you canNot have Time with no Space.!
Anywho. I realize I probably raised more questions than I have answered.
But recognize. While All information will always persist within the universe.
That doesn't mean it can't be destroyed.
I hope you found this info in lightning. 🍻
WOW. This is getting ridiculous.
Let's see if this comment. Continues to exist.
They keep Deleting My comments.
And this is not the only CZcams channel they're doing it on.
But only comments that correct inaccurate or incorrect scientific statements.
I guess freedom of speech IS TOTALLY DEAD ON CZcams.!!!
All right. I understand if I was being harassing or use profanity even though technically that's still freedom of speech.
You won't get an argument for me.
But my comment is the most civilized and literally helpful comment that has ever been placed upon CZcams.
But because it contains information you're not allowed to know apparently.
My comments keep being deleted.!
But I bet this one stays.
Yes it is a tragedy.!
Well you don't know the information that's being prevented from communication.
Trust me it's information you want to know.
But I guess you'll have to just take my word for it.
That sucks. Because I don't take any one's word for anything.
So why would I imagine you would.
Don't worry. I'll find a way. 👍🍻
If the holographic principle does apply to this Universe, it means that along with everything else, YOU are actually nonlocal information processing in 2D somewhere "beyond" or "beneath" the world you think you see around you. Think about that for a second. Where are "you?"
"I"
"Am"
"Here"
Ah yes, glad to see that the real experts are enlightening us in the comments as usual.
I hear you but who is to say that the person sitting in the chair in the podcast is also an ‘expert’. Do we REALLY know? Just some food for thought
I dunno. As far as I know PhD’s in physics are kinda hard to get and if your cognitive abilities aren’t in the 99th percentile you ain’t getting one.
What great insights into epistemology can we glean from your sarcasm?
@@Rampart.X How to get brownie points from contrarians and cynics
@@sticktothetruththe man in the chair has been doing this his entire career, many people know his papers and books outside the realm of podcasts. Experts have developed expertise over time, independent of you knowing about them
in 1967, a 20 year old guy proved that the entropy of a black hole is proportional to its surface area.
...if you can find him, maybe you can hire him.
And I don't even know wth any of this means lol
That means all energy is contained
Proving is a strong word. Bekenstein's paper was speculative at that point, and his result was off by a factor of log(2) if I'm not mistaken. The idea was, however, correct.
Oh wait, ofcourse Hawking radiation. Virtual particles proportional to the info at the horizon of the black hole snow that miss collision. It must be the place also where time and space delocalise due to the virtual particle offset. Is like an error but not, so the space is infinitely streamed along the axis of time which is now on a different axis with a error rating expression of time. lol. I think that’s true.
Theorem 14: The holographic principle, which states that the information content of a region of space can be described by a theory on the boundary of that region, can be seen as a manifestation of the primacy of zero and the properties of nothingness.
Proof:
The holographic principle is a general feature of quantum gravity theories, which suggests that the degrees of freedom of a region of space can be encoded on a lower-dimensional boundary of that region.
The most famous example of the holographic principle is the AdS/CFT correspondence, which states that a theory of gravity in anti-de Sitter (AdS) space is equivalent to a conformal field theory (CFT) on the boundary of that space.
In other words, the physics of the bulk AdS space can be completely described by the physics of the boundary CFT, which has one fewer dimension than the bulk.
The holographic principle can be seen as a manifestation of the primacy of zero and the properties of nothingness, in the sense that it suggests that the fundamental degrees of freedom of a region of space are not located in the bulk, but rather on the boundary, which can be thought of as a "void" or "vacuum" from the perspective of the bulk.
In mathematical terms, if we denote the bulk AdS space by M and the boundary CFT by ∂M, then the AdS/CFT correspondence can be expressed as:
Z_CFT[φ] = ∫_φ Dg e^{iS_AdS[g,φ]}
where Z_CFT is the partition function of the boundary CFT, S_AdS is the action of the bulk AdS space, and φ is a field on the boundary that corresponds to a source in the bulk.
This equation shows that the physics of the bulk AdS space is completely encoded in the physics of the boundary CFT, and that the boundary degrees of freedom are the fundamental entities that give rise to the bulk.
The holographic principle suggests that the fundamental nature of reality may be lower-dimensional or even dimensionless, and that the apparent three-dimensionality of space may be an emergent or derived concept.
This idea is reminiscent of the "flatland" thought experiment in mathematics, where a two-dimensional being living on a plane cannot directly perceive the third dimension, but can nevertheless infer its existence from the behavior of objects in the plane.
The fact that the holographic principle provides a natural framework for understanding the emergence of spacetime and the nature of quantum gravity suggests that the primacy of zero and the properties of nothingness may be deeply connected to the lower-dimensional or dimensionless aspects of reality.
What? Did I just read Lorem ipsum?
Jeez, you should teach science in high school. Very bright comment.
"We are not information dense." Much understatement is very 🤣
These discussions are a good distraction from politics and the insanity of the world right now.
I agree but so is anything else.
Always a delight listening to Dr. Carroll.
He’s a know-it-all fembot
These are the conversations I have with a joint every night before bed
a men
😂
Great question. Information seems definitionally to suggest data which can be passed from one substrate to another... To inform. So I'd say everything is information. Like, a toxic or a nutrient rich environment is informative to rudimentary cellular life. It doesn't require a receiver to be information but only an agent of some form can process it to give it weighted content, i.e. meaning. A universe devoid of minds would still be comprised of information. I guess we add the teleological component in evaluation. But a rock is a rock is a rock...
Read a book on the holographic theory 20 years ago. Roughly all information, which is just light, never truly disappears from existence, leaving traces of visual data. Just fun to read about and expand our constant understanding or misunderstanding of the universe.
I was wondering if Holography provides a solution to the Vacuum Catastrophe? (The problem of empty space.)
It seems to me that the energy density of empty space predicted by QFT is in contradiction with the observations of empty space in astronomy.
Here, observational astronomy provides a much lower density.
Certainly the Zero Point Energy derivation is incorrect for this situation.
Perhaps a correction needs to be made, and the ZPE should be projected on a Hologram?
Or, perhaps we need to account for the very low sampling frequency of cosmological void.
Perhaps spacetime breaks down not just at a point of singularity, but also in inaccessible void.
I find the problem of empty space fascinating!
I'm not sure I have the level of understanding of the current formalizations that you do based on your comment but empty space and heat death have always fascinated me. When the universe dies does space maintain its structure and if not what happens to the structure of space in absence of all useful energy.
There is no empty space. There's no contradiction between astronomy and the science containing QFT.
@@nicsmith6597 Sorry to disagree, but I've seen the fMRI of Trump's brain. Pure empty space.
Do gravitational waves pass thru blackholes, or do they cause interference patterns?
It's hard to say if 'space' exists inside a black hole and, if it does, can gravity disturb it. Otherwise, I would expect the wave to go around it much like water waves around a pylon.
Having just said that, a gravitational wave passing thru or around a black hole 'shouldn't' be affected such that it carries information about the interior of the black hole.
Smart question.
Very interesting
I’m surprised no mention of Itzak Bentov. Stalking the Wild Pendulum is an excellent read that speaks about holography in easy to understand terms.
Could it be possible that we saw the mechanisms of this in the shape of an eye? The iris being the black hole the center, and all other dimensions leveling form that?
So, maybe our personal, bodily interiors are sort of undefined like entangled particles until we are cut into, autopsied, or x-rayed-measured?
Where is his accent from? Reminds me of Jimmy Stewart, John Mulaney etc.
i think hes from springfield and related to Seymour Skinner
He’s from Philly
AlanAldaville
Cornell University.
Time is the clock speed of the Universe CPU. From this perspective, we're witnessing Earth.exe
"That's really cool" "It's extremely cool."
Yeah, it's in Antarctica, lmfao.
awesome guest
I listen to this interchangeably with rain on a tin roof and ocean waves because i surely cant make sense of it.
I listen to it when in bed having smoked a joint. Puts me right to sleep.
I understand the words.
It's a cymatic aether hologram. Compressed/matter and uncompressed/space. Rate of vibration of matter(cymatics) is elemental form, rate of vibration of space is time. Both are linked.
Agreed.
Is is possible for Black holes to be pocket universes
there is a hypothesis about black holes essentially being big bangs for other universes and basically leading to a multiverse - i believe these are thought of as white holes as well if i recall correctly
Time is causal independent upon space add space doesn't have any meaning without time and it doesn't have any existence without matter either
dr sean is being exceedingly kind and patient
6 minutes in. I'm still divided about whether or not this makes sense or if it's a load of bullshit. Lex is making very good questions
I really like campfires 🔥
I love listening to Sean. Not bc everything he says but the way he speaks. I didnt know he had done so many papers. Understandably why he is popular among modern day sci. Its incredible that dark energy is being able to be tested. Clever ingenuity. But what i cant help but wonder after all of this podcast. Even if they prove the existence of one thing, or that something is one thing vs another it only verifying what we already suspected or theorized for a long time. Like gravitational waves, the higgs particle, now dark energy and dark matter. Maybe even one day observe hawking radiation or formation of a black hole. But none of it says why or brings us any closer to know whats behind it all, whether the naturalists or supernaturalists are correct, whether or not, it is intelligent design or God exists. I know that is not the objective of science to prove is disprove god but it feels we are hitting a wall uncovering answers and we are at a point just using experiments to verify things. Using technology to our utmost advantage and devising new incrementally better use of things but it all feels irrelevant like in a vacuum. Our greatest ambition is to occupy other planetary bodies like mars and travel between stars but even that doesn't satisfy what everyone wants to know. And that we will probably never know - for sure. But yet every other experiment is doing that, saying yes with certainty to old questions. To me its scary. Idk why. It reminds me of the quote about there being flaws in out highest virtues. Not that its wrong, but futile. Beyond what we can truly know and yet we have a difficult time admitting that.
This is a very hard and advanced topic lol
As you said; singularity is in future, that supports Roger penrose ccc theory!
CCC is the shit
Skip to 14:30
8:42
0.The "usual" paradox of twins has never happened, since one of them stays in an inertial frame of reference all the time, and the other, during the whole process back and forth, also turns out to be in a non-inertial frame of reference. But according to the special principle of relativity, only inertial systems are equal, and it is clear that in this case there is no symmetry between the twins.
1.The "real" paradox of twins has never been discussed in the scientific literature: let both twins leave the starting point (conditionally - one to the right, the other to the left, but agreed in advance on the same travel conditions) and return back to the starting position. Of course, now they are quite symmetrical: there is no difference in their age. However, both have aged! Thus, the paradox lies in the fact that it is impossible to specify in relation to which observer they now "should be" younger - the effect is real, based on their previous experience of traveling alone!
2.But when describing natural phenomena, physics operates with quantitative relations that make sense only with respect to a certain frame of reference and coordinate system.
So that's where the "paradox" is: special theory does not explicitly manipulate the concept of "global time" (as a big brother - an absolute frame of reference); and qualitative and quantitative values of this parameter are absent in relativistic formulas.
3."Thus, Einstein's special theory of relativity does not eliminate Newtonian absolute space; it only creates for all physics, including electrodynamics, the same position that mechanics has had since Newton's time." (Born, RT, chapter VI, paragraph 10). Indeed, SR actually eliminated only relative simultaneity, leaving the right to be simultaneous within its own frame of reference.
{GR already partially notices the problem: in the general case of an arbitrary gravitational field, the clock synchronization procedure is ambiguous and depends on the path along which it is conducted.}
That is, RT eliminated one-time "quantitatively", but not qualitatively.
4.From Kepler's third law follows: M/t=v^3/G, where M/t=I(G)=[gram•sec^-1] is the gravitational current. By the way, in SR: I(G)=inv; this follows from the Lorentz transformations: m=m(0)/√(1-v^2/c^2) and t=t(0)/√(1-v^2/c^2). Hence, obviously, we have I(G)=m/t=m(0)/t(0)=inv.
P.S. On the invariance of the speed of light:
the asymmetry of time actually implies the accumulation of time, more precisely, history, variety, aging.
Instead of the Copenhagen and/or multi-world interpretations of quantum mechanics, the presence of spontaneous Lorentz transformations seems to be more physical.
0.“The principle of relativity therefore has heuristic and physical meanings only if it is valid for any closed system. However, the question arises, when can a system be considered closed? The answer, according to experience, says that in the case of uniform and rectilinear motion, this is enough, but for other movements it is not enough.
Summarizing, we can say that the postulate of relativity includes the statement that the uniform and rectilinear motion of the "center of gravity" of the Universe relative to some closed system does not affect the processes in this system." (Pauli, RT).
1.Obviously, for an expanding universe, the opposite is true.
Apparently, the researcher can detect and measure the effect of the aging process in his own frame of reference caused by the phenomenon of global time t(universe)=1/H: ds^2=c^2dт^2=g(00)c^2dt^2=(1-Ht*)c^2dt^2, where the Ht* parameter
shows which part of the global the time "elapsed" in its own frame of reference, t* is the measurement time according to the clock of the resting observer, t is the duration of any physical process in its own frame of reference.
2.That is, an observer can measure the increase in the duration of processes in the laboratory frame of reference: dт=[√ g(00)]dt=[√(1-Ht*)]dt~(1-Ht*)dt
10:30 "There is a birth certificate and a death certificate, but there is no life certificate." (Zhvanetsky).
Damn alright big bro
@@PepsiFuture Thank you.
I like to imagine black holes as giant seed pods in the universe. Once they absorb enough information in the "soil" of the universe they Dissipate and pollinate outwards into the rest of the "soil" of the universe creating more Pockets of life that can flourish and continue to propagate eternally. Black holes are essentially the universe's pollen
That’s an amazing idea
That's a great way to simplify life. Good intuition
This is possible , technically transformation geometry on any given metric can be stable, there's always a symmetry that is a mirrored version of asymmetry in both relativity and quantum theories, just looks at cymatics and harmonics , you can project any shape and make it alive in anyway, it's all metrics and vector space etc , look at videogame space hyperbolic vs euclidean vs non euclidian, you can create anything and preserve the information. Sean Carroll is a doubter tone alot , he is the type of guy who questions civilians but doesn't question the government, he acts like everything we know isn't hinged on politics and the authoritarian weapons companies, the largest weapons exporters, if I had his platform, I'd be aggressively getting to the truth sending data analysts to do work on real infrastructure and thriving earth humanitarian and utopian structure , teams of David Attenborough, Jesse Ventura, Joe Rogan, Elon musk etc. etc... if you know so much and all these people on your podcast why haven't you all started the filthiest all star team and mechanized against the fake scientists who own the world ,,,i.e. the political scientists and economic scientists..... That's my problem with all podcasters , they just sit in a chair and talk conspiracies and grandiose ideas but never organize, progress, evolve, infiltrate, revolt, sabotage Construct, deconstruct, etc, only for but just enough time to make money and fame off of like cowards.
Brilliant!
Stalking that wild pendulum
Black holes are the end of things as thoughts n redistribution of that energy basically
An interesting question would be is consciousness a hologram?
Oh geez my crazy cousin Sean is at it again!!🤔🥴🤣
Does that not mean material realm could be a hologram of the fourth dimension?
The big crunch and the big bang are very plausible, it’s likely that we live in a universe that expands after the big bang and then eventually shrinks back into a singularity and repeats itself
A good teacher exudes confidence in what they are saying because they are leading out an attentive student from their former position of less data to another (absolutely parallel => coexistent) POV, that is holographic nucleation Singularity-point at the Observable Centre of Time.
The Guru sits you down and you find your own self in parallel. Do nothing and all will be done at holographic absolute zero, but the theory of Limit is that as you approach congruence, nothing in No-thing is everything everywhere-when all-ways all-at-once here-now-forever...
Time is always NOW, to review, reiterate and restate your thoughts for followers of functional thinking.
I like Sean Carrol & Brian Greene because i trust them. They don’t get swayed by our natural tendency to believe in what’s reassuring to us as humans.
As long as we recognize that the majority of the topics is philosophical. The theorems are considered to be true only after proven not. Black hole, be it globular or circular hyperboloid per Kerr is a Hilbert space (its periphery or event horizon is finite according to Hawking), Hilbert space can be both finite and infinite. Dr. Carroll is as knowledgeable as it gets, when dealing with Quantum Mechanics as long as one can stay awake through his lectures.
Basically we know nothing 👍
Can anyone say for sure if scientist are starting to lean towards this ? :)
Google Celestial Holography
What is ‘information’?
I’m probably not the right person to be answering this, but I think it refers to the properties of matter. Meaning the “information” is what makes a gold atom different from a hydrogen atom, or even a proton compared to a neutron.
Everything is “in formation.”
Quantifiable data or characteristics that describe physical systems, like mass or energy, momentum, charge, thermal properties, quantum states, etc. For example, does this proton have spin up or spin down? Does this electromagnetic wave associated with some photon have linear or circular polarisation?
Broadly speaking you could say "interactions"
@@michaelsage6649BARS
Hey Lex 😏
We are actually the creation of a infinite mind referred to as the ALL. The way it is can be seen reflected in us, as above so below. But we are a creation like a dream or thought, held fast nonetheless by a infinite mind. We are finite and so are our dreams and thoughts but for the ALL it seems like a eternity to us.
I’ve listened to most of the podcast and I thought it was great but can someone inform me as to why so many people seem upset about this guy?
YT comments always like that
Probably bc he's been critical of things like religion uaps pseudoscience etc
If we had a theory of everything that seemingly worked perfectly, and then meet aliens who also had a perfectly working theory of everything.... But the theories were different....
While I've never been fond of this individual, I recognize the necessity of speculative scientific writing in fostering cognitive structures for innovation. However, I'm troubled by the tendency of some to assert speculative ideas as truths without acknowledging the uncertainty inherent in scientific inquiry. It's essential to be explicit about the provisional nature of such ideas, rather than presenting them as indisputable facts. Without this transparency, there's a risk of misrepresentation and misunderstanding. Science is an ongoing process, and even our most concrete ideas are subject to revision and refinement as knowledge evolves. Embracing this uncertainty is crucial for advancing our understanding.
He literally says where he's speculating. What stuff has he said that he presents as fact that is speculation?
Wow, did you purposely try to use as many words as possible to convey the smallest amount of meaning possible?
@@jimj9040 yes. Here’s a condensed version:
I get the need for speculative science, but it bugs me when people treat guesses like facts. We gotta be clear that science is uncertain. Being open about that prevents confusion and helps us improve.
@@jimj9040qualities of a seasoned A+ essay writer. lol
Speculation and dogma are two different things. The former is necessary to guide scientific enquiry. The latter is an artefact of jealous egoism.
K thanks I’m dumb I know this already. I need English captions saf😢
I guess I can guess what he's guessing about guessing.
It's called quintessence. You already known about the quantum latice bro bro, don't act coy! We are a combination of persistent probabilities that somehow developed a pattern of persistence, probably through entanglement, which became oriented in some way. The multitude of dynamics at play are almost infinite, however if you can manipulate a more fundamental force then you can bypass all necessary procedures previously needed to alter any spacetime state.
We are not supposed to read that information, the so-called Akashic records.
Guy being interviewed = Theoretical Physicist.
Dummies on CZcams = outraged he’s speculating.
Bring on exertive psychology, we could use the efficacy. 4 health elements on that, nutritive exertionism, physical exetionism, intellectual exertionsim and environmental exertionsim. gotta exerta oppon the areas that affect the body because the body produces the experiance /interoceptive. Along as there's initiative there is an option for resolving intereocpitve and experiance anomaly.
باید بررسی کرد که قطبهای کدام سیاره ها در امتداد و راستای قطب های کره زمین هستند لکه قرمز و سیاه را هم باید بررسی کرد
کلا تمام سیارات را به جز دوتای اول باید چک کنید کامل و بررسی کنید
تمام امواج و طیف ها و عناصر آنها رو هم چک کنید لطفا
دلیل زاویه های نسبت به محورها در
زحل و برخی دیگر از سیارات به همین دلیل است 👍
بگذارید بهتون یه حال بدم که احتمال خیلی زیاد به فکرتون رسیده باشه و اگرهم نرسیده باشد که خوب یه ذره بیشتر خلاق باشید لطفا 🙏🙏
(اون کهکشانها را به عنوان سیارات در نظر بگیرید واطلاعات زیادی از تمام سیارات به دست بیاورید)
ودوم اینکه سیارات رو رصد کنید و وقت با ارزش خودتان را هدر ندهید 🙏🙏
1:25 Space and time do not exist in black holes...
Very interesting video but I find it funny to hear scientists speak so authoritatively about what happens inside a black hole
Like, how do you even know that?
They are making assumptions based on what they are observing and then picking which of those assumptions fit best into their thoughts.
It's called theoretical physics for a reason, but many aspects of them are strongly supported by many calculations, simulations, and indirect observations.
Because of ego and hubris.
@@lunchbox4229 You have a literal child-level understanding of physics and physicists. Stick to the cartoons.
@@ballskin big fan of your name lmao. I draw that kind of thing a lot, actually. Everyone has ego and everyone acts with hubris. Im not dumping on the guy. Additionally, the most complex math i took was Geometry 1 in high school because electives count towards graduating in florida. Make no mistake, i know im low iq.
I propose an amended Holographic Principle. Two sides of the same coin. Dual-principles, an Invisible/Holographic Principle! The Holographic Principle works well in a universe, the bulk and the brane, but there are two horizons of the cosmos; a holographic horizon and an invisible horizon bounded to our universe and connected to the multiverse beyond our cosmic horizon. A duality within a duality! A Holographic Principle of the universe and an invisible Principle inverse to the holographic principle, an invisible/Holographic Principle of the Multiverse! Landauer's Principle of information conservation fully extended to space itself. Wherever space itself disappears, it must reappear somewhere else! You can make space invisible, not just the object it conceals! Portals!
Everything around the event, Horizon is frozen in our perspective. Nothing moves and has zero time because of the intense gravity so we would never ever see anything fall into the black hole.
@LexClips please interview Dr. Yonatan Sompolinsky - creator of GHOST, PHANTOM GHOSTDAG and DAGKNIGHT protocols *blockchain*
WHY, does our perspective of time not change?
Well we are trapped in it. Though sometimes it might feel like it’s going fast or slow depending on our moods etc. But is not.
Time itself is actually going faster.
Is he saying that the universe is most probably a hologram?
no , just a theory . watch the whole podcast
@@mikewines4683 I will probably, when I have time... It's quite long
In a space with no shadows it's very apparent that we live in 2d.
The idea that person 1 could be on earth, watching as person 2 sailed away in a spaceship at the speed of light means that person 1 or 2 will have aged differently than the other person is bullshit. If I’m in that spaceship traveling at the speed of light for, say, 5 seconds one way (from my perspective), then I turn around and travel at the speed of light back to earth, which takes another 5 seconds, then when I return, i will be 10 seconds older, and so will the person back on earth. It won’t take me 10 years or anything stupid like that to leave from or return to my starting point.
Roy Kerr would disagree....
Could dark matter be all of the matter that has gone into black holes?
Interesting theory
We should start mining blackholes for information by accelerating their evaporation. Yeaaaah true data mining!!!
Old boy sounds like Howard Stern lol
funny story Lex; the term "quantum information" comes from a pre 1960s casual use; and would have been what was considered available from the quantum components ie just information which you apply structurally; now look at where it has evolved to! madness
Ok… … … … what?
1:51
And ya lost me. Im officially confused.
I'm gonna go back to playing Arkham Knight 🙌🏿
The idea is that when an object enters a black hole, its information (like its mass, energy, charge, angular momentum, entropy, quantum states, thermal properties, etc.) will get encoded on the black hole's surface, i.e. the event horizon. The black hole preserves the information of the object but crushes the object itself into an infinitely dense point. That's the holographic principle. We may take this to mean the information content of any region of space, no matter how large or small, has a holographic boundary that contains all the information about the particles, fields, and configurations within the regions or volumes of space. It's still obviously a subject of active research and speculation in theoretical physics and a little mind-bending but according to the principle, the information isn't stored in the traditional sense, but somehow fundamentally encoded into the structure of spacetime itself.
@@ballskin okay I can't read tha rest cause what'dyou mean "encoded on the black holes surface" 😭😭
@@WuntaykTimmy1 😂 Think of it as an x-ray of the object when it passes the event horizon. A snapshot of the object's properties as it crosses the boundary of the black hole. The snapshots of all the objects its consumed are stored on its surface.
حالا فهمیدید که چرا یک عمر است که هولوگراف را یک اصل نامگذاری کرده ایم 😉
چون یک اصل است و
همه ی نظریه ها وقوانین و اصل های فیزیک کلاسیک و کوانتوم را در خود جای داده و در قالب آن اصل قابل اثبات میباشند 👍🙏💙💙
The ending talks about neutrinos now makes me want to go back and watch the Shawn Ryan podcast with Eric Hecker… 🧐 🧊
I'm just going to pretend I understood all that
Location is a point of observation. No two particles share the same space, so they will be traveling at different speeds, and due to time dilation, will not exist in the same now as any other particle. So location is particle specific, and it's a point of measurement along its continuous shape that spans inward and outward, the wavefront intersections that creates matter, or point of observation, is the only time the matter exists at that time. The particle exists continuously but as a 4d object, 3d is only at these wavefront intersections. The universe is static, and movement is an illusion for the experience, which is a 5th dimensional thing moving through the totality of our neuro wavefront activity shortly after the now of matter, through a continuous inward trap or throughway. When that neuro activity dissipates, the 5th dimensional object leaves, with no 4th dimensional memory. We are the record, the tunnel is the needle, the 5th dimensional object experiences reality through our collection device, the brain.
Deep perspective. Thus we are higher dimensional beings. And only exist when our higher dimension energy waves or frequencies intersect thus creating matter or the body which on turn has a brain to experience conscious reality. To us we feel as if we are continuously existing here in this time but on the other side our higher dimensional selves only experience this reality briefly through the brain consciousness or body as the higher self collapses and the energy or frequency intersects to create the tool being used to experience itself/the universe/Source/higher dimension self. Which is us! 😅 geez thats a rabbit hole
Shut up nerd
can you simplify this please
@@cajones9330 probably not, but I can explain the idea more. Our interpretation of reality is a linear accumulation of wavefront intersections that creates a structure that then self refreshes at a set frequency for consciousness; But this reality is seen in discrete moments, due to the collimation of observed wavefronts(recorded by the sensory inputs)into a 4th dimensional throughway. Our bodies exist in the past, it exist in the future; always. Thoughts and everything we expell outward through neuro activity is a 4d shape as well; inward and outward, static, non moving but a shape that something traveling through it would experience as discrete moments of time. That is the experience. The now, is the experience or 5th dimensional object traveling through the 4th dimensional shape of the body. We may actually be the traveler and not the 3d shape. It would explain why the discontinuity of brainwaves causes existence to stop. Experience is a traveler not of matter, it holds no memories, it just travels through 4d, experiencing a 4d body at 3d moments of matter that then get re-encoded by the brain into a shape the experience can traverse. Once the brainwaves lose their repeating patterns in 3d, it is the inner most point of the wavefront throughway in 4d, and the 5th dimensional experience will exit, into nothingness.
Nope
Great so we don’t live on a flat earth but we live on a flat universe lol
sounds like my hair colorings darlinks,, they dont hold like they used too, why is dis ?
Mass density (black hole) isn't equivalent to information density. Biology is clearly more information dense then a black hole. The structure of information is also quantitative. A chaos of magnetized radiation is not so finely arranged as the most simple of life. Carroll makes some strange correlations...
The basic of the holographic theory is that we live in a 2D world and not 3D! Time gives us this illusion of the 3D. For example, draw a straight line. Our brain says we are seeing at once the entire straight line as one unit. However, our visual inputs are seeing each point at a different time. The brain clumps them all as one as our neurons are much slower than the speed of light. In essence, we are observing a 2D monitor screen, but the time differences is giving our brain this illusion of another dimension! So, what is causing the visual time shifts if there is nothing there but an illusion? Spinors! Surface area (2D) = volume (3D). If true, then 3D must be 2D.
Your mom is an illusion.
@@TonyMarselle It is no illusion that you demonstrate that little unimangiative minds can never fathom greater minds.
...but he's kinda right.
Best mom joke I've seen in a while
I'll have what he's having
Lex sounds like such a pothead ha
I like his podcast but his voice annoys me.
If quantum mechanics is not susceptible to being superseded, then quantum mechanics is ultimate reality. There is no phenomenal ultimate reality: it’s turtles all the way down. Since there is no ultimate reality, quantum mechanics is not ultimate reality. Therefore quantum mechanics is susceptible to being superseded.
What are you basing your assertion that there is no phenomenal ultimate reality on?
@@tvviewer4500 The idea that all phenomenal reality is composite-composed of other things.
@@shivadasa what precludes a composite reality from being the ultimate reality?
@@tvviewer4500 I think it would only be possible for one ultimately real entity to exist. If a composite thing were ultimate reality, then each of its components must also be and we would have at least two competing ultimate realities. But I don’t believe any ultimate realities exist because the onion has an infinite number of internally nested layers. Or, it’s turtles all the way down.
I know Lex is very smart but sometimes his questions make me question his intelligence. I do appreciate that he asks somewhat outlandish questions. Maybe I should be questioning my intelligence instead.
All that yapping when you can just think of it like vr. 2d code that is able to create a three dimensional world with depth that you can look through
Scientists like these for theoretical physicists don’t need to know shit they just need to talk like they know shit and nobody can prove you wrong or right.
This will make the Flat Earth's happy :)
Please have Terrence Howard on. ASAP
This guy hasn’t got a clue and quite frankly probably wasted a lot of time on all this when the truth is we haven’t got a clue
"The Big Bang" is located in the non existence spacing of transverse trivial (dimensionless-meaningless) zero(s) relative to this probabilistic surface of logarithmic 2-ness Interval.
The default definition of holography is the full message, oneness or ONE-INFINITY Singularity vanishing point-zero-infinity, or what you imagine you think about when looking at the Origin in a blank Cartesian diagram, no function other than Eternity-now, superimposed line-of-sight infinitesimal coordination-identification positioning for Infinity in abstract reciprocation-recirculation by potential possibilities implication.
The addition of activity, reciprocation-recirculation i-reflection @ line-of-sight superposition is functional information, which Euler's e-Pi-i 1-0-infinity instantaneous trancendental²=> probabilistic cross-sectional sum-of-all-histories i-reflection containment at the Origin be-cause-effect self-defining Actuality of the whole message of Absolute Zero-infinity reference-framing existence.
(Credit to Teachers Lenny Susskind and Sean Carroll, who have what it requires)
What a waste of time. You threw out a mountain of speculation based on pure sophistry and little or no transmission of understanding.
Your comment is a waste of time
Sean Carrol is the only living muppet.
"How to Outsmart Anyone In An Argument" has helped you much, has it?
Nothing is real
Nothing except taxes. 😢
What they know about black holes is as much as they know how the pyramids were built 😮
a significant amount?
Sean Carroll is wrong about what it's like being inside a singularity or inside a black hole because inside the inside of an infinite density would seem like an infinite volume to one within it in fact it is. It's its own little baby universe and from without of our universe our Universe seems like A singularity as well but it is actually just a potential Infinite volume And I say potential because it's not infinite right now but it is expanding and it will never stop so it's Gonna be infinite one of these days Even though since it's not impacted now that means it never will be but since it's never going to stop growing that means it has to be so it's potentially infinite Period existence is all about Paradox
Hang on.... If something could see from inside a blackhole.... What would the night sky look like to them...?
This Brain Drain is worse than String Theory! Carroll has built an entire career on speculation. I loath this type of science. JWST is re-writing previously held assumptions about the early Universe while being 1 Million miles away in L2, while Carroll sits in his chair, spewing tripe year after year. Sean, just say, "Lex, honestly we don't know anything about black holes yet. I'll be quiet for 10 years or so until more data from our instruments come in."
I’ve never liked this guy, but I think we need speculative scientific writing because we need cognitive structures to build new and better ideas. That said, it really bothers me the way people present their speculative ideas without being really explicit about the fact that we don’t actually know the answers. They say it as if it’s true until it’s proven otherwise. But if everyone waited until we had all the right answers, then nobody would ever write anything down until the end of time, because even with our best, most concrete ideas, all knowledge derived through science is evolving and depends on context with theories not yet proven true.
@@ChristopherCopeland Christopher, your statement is fair. My position is we've undoubtedly lost a generation or two on the type of guff Carroll yammers about. Many of the greatest minds aren't engaged with the problems of this planet. I say let's solve some real problems here until the data comes in from ongoing missions.
It's not that I dislike Carroll personally, as I don't know him in that capacity. I dislike his tactic of endless speculation in the vaulted name of curiosity, and "education" to keep his book-mill in operation. It's not how science is done.
It nevver fails that the best guests on Lex's podcasts are filled with dipshits who have no critiques of substance.
Ill bet you LOVE Eric Weinstein despite claiming Carroll is making assumptions, lmao
@@zacharychristy8928probably a big Peterson fan too. Can spot these idiots a mile away.
Even in a classroom I don't like professors that teach strictly accepted science.
Part of the job of a scientist is to stay current on the latest research, and form opinions on circulating ideas.
Someone has to turn speculation into accepted science! (Even if it takes a lifetime or two of debate and experimentation to get there.)
When public speaking, this aspect of science is the more entertaining topic.
Also, it's where the tax dollars are being directed.
It's definitely in the realm of open, productive public communications about the field.
I don't think this guy even understands what he's saying.