Being a student of Jordan Peterson and Just listening to How Jordan Peterson talks and thinks it's clear he does not have a photographic memory which makes him even more extraordinary
He has interesting things to say at times, but if strays into other fields that are not his areas of expertise all the time. If you look at what experts in those fields have to say about his claims in those areas, they’re frequently wrong. He’s really not all he’s cracked out to be
Jordan Peterson just made me appreciate my own brain. What he described and physically acted out is how my own brain organizes things but I have so often tried to make it work differently. I also appreciate how he didn’t let the other guy tell him how his own brain worked; he stuck with what he knew about himself to be true.
No, he has a strict ideology and belief system, and he makes note of things that support that belief system and discards things that don't. It's called confirmation bias.
@@heldinahtmlhellreally what evidence do you have to make a claim like that? There are many time where Jordan has stated that he has changed his mind, was surprised by the results, etc. there is also evidence that this information has altered his theory as well. So where do you get off with your claim.
@@heldinahtmlhell I can see how it seems like that's what he said, but I disagree. He plugs things he disagrees with into the theory as well, and if the results are unexpected, he changes the theory
I could tell this is how JBP thinks. I've developed the same way with programming. Everything self directed and incorporated into a a sort of working model. Each new piece of info is either plugged in to expand the model, or the model adapts. Once you have this model, you can easily pull from it to answer questions, or just talk for hours as you explore different sections.
Does this process transcend professions and academics? Say if you have such a system for approaching a profession, that in itself is a micro compartment in a larger approach to life that also runs similarly.
@@ElvisismI reason to believe so. The model encapsulates all knowledge learned almost like a 3D puzzle. I want to know what lectures he’s referring to.
I find a good way to remember information is to think of how you would explain it to someone else. It seems more personal after that and that seems to help.
This guy had to hear Peterson say no 8 times before he shut his mouth and let the interviewee speak and clarify what he does actually think. This guy has no business interviewing Katy Perry, much less Jordan Peterson
He treats his mind like an infinite puzzle not a photo library it’s the way we gotta do it because we have limited ram and gotta be imaginative to solidify the importance of the information to recall it in a more thought out way
That’s more or less how I read non fiction books! I love the way he articulates it. You can easily retain far more info by categorization of different aspects of the information itself!
The photographic memory thing is amusing because it's indicative of how people who do not think like us, often perceive intelligence, and intellectualism, etc. So it shows how far they are in perceiving the true nature of such thought as ours. There's a large difference in possessing knowledge, and attaining understanding, and evaluating new thoughts, to flesh out the comprehension of reality, in all it's dimensions. So that the new take hold, and the old pass away.
@@regerbryan You seem insecure. Strange that you don't realize that there are some quite intelligent people using this site. Learn some humility What it seems like is that this person you're criticizing isn't shouting his intelligence but instead just stating a fact. Not every one in the comments section is average or an idiot. I get the sense that the OP is neither
@@regerbryan Abstract thinkers. If you want me to simplify it for you, it's scoring high in a personality trait called "openness." There are also subcategories of openness, which you can look up further. The way you understand things have to have some relevance, in that the concept you are discovering has to slot in with the general knowledge you already have, rather than being pure detail. This is what makes it abstract, and what I could probably even say is opposite to remembering specific details. It is somewhat ignorant that some people could think being high in openness in this particular manner means that you have photographic memory. The two are not remotely the same. And as I explained earlier, could probably even be called opposites.
I think the same way! It's like making an abstract model of your understanding and it's like a puzzle where each piece can be extrapolated. Some people build the boarders, some start with a corner, some the center, and others make groups of familiar images. The crazy thing is each skill or specific understanding has a breadth and depth since history is continual. (Although this isn't how it looks in my head it works as a model) Imagine making a THICK puzzle about 7 inches thick per peice and every inch is another color in a rainbow 🌈 . All the pieces have the same pattern of color. Color represents both age and discovery (who did what and when). Each piece represents a subject we either experience or soon acknowledge
I am like that too. I think what’s he’s affectively saying is he understands “the meaning” > the content; the meaning becomes part of his map. For example, I’ve always had this problem: When I took literature writing classes in college I could write an essay that told you the exact meaning of the story - why it was written, what the characters represent, how the author is using them to make arguments - but I definitely wouldn’t be able to tell you random Jeopardy facts about the book. It’s really the difference between “synthesizing”information (extrapolating the meaning) vs. retaining the content (jeopardy facts).
Every person is like that. He articulated it perfectly. Everyone is gradually building a theory. I was doing absolutely the same for the last couple of years and now he just explained to me what I was doing
Yes, I perceive and process basically the same as JP. I always refer to my unifying theory as he sort of states it, as my jigsaw puzzle. All experience, all information, I receive, I search for then reorganize and place the pieces to form the picture of all things together. There's always a place for everything, and nothing is left out. And I look at all layers of a thing, and try to understand their essence, and the fabric of all.
I see patterns in the pieces, and how every piece fits together, or at least that's the goal. It's a constant process, and my mind is often lost to the effort, and enjoyment of the process. It's both straining, and highly enjoyable at times. I often know and understand things before others, and in deeper and further reaching ways. I often am able to solve problems that others aren't even aware of, or if they are, in ways they do not consider. I see answers that can only be seen, if you can see the grand picture. I also recognize that my strength and ability therein, is both a gift, and curse, and that all forms of intelligence, and ability, have their important places, and roles. I see myself as a speaker, a philosopher, an artist, an advisor, a problem solver, an innovator, a consultant, a visionary, etcetera. I am one whose greatest work is on ideas and concepts, so from the outside it may seem that I do little work at all, but it hardly stops internally.
@@Frejborg You have a massively over inflated ego, as well as delusions of grandeur. Seek therapy, I recommend cognitive behavioral therapy so you can learn the causes of your ego mania
Oh I love this. And I feel so happy, I think that I think like that too . That makes him look even more human. And that's make listening to him easier.
It takes a pretty comprehensive understanding of things to be able to categorize concepts accurately like so. Kudos for your tenacity and drive to come to such wisdom.
He is adding to his schema just as everyone does with ideas. It just so happens that he is extraordinary well read and smart, so his schema is far more sophisticated than most people's. .
Just a tidbit of information the "interviewer" is Patrick bet David and if you go to the full video you won't find anyone who says that he cuts Jordan off and asks him a million times about this. Because in the greater context of the conversation makes it obvious that it's not the case and this video cut out about 30% of this specific part of the conversation making it seem like he is cutting him off and being very persistent but due to the cuts and what seems to be a slight speed up i can see how it would give you that idea
I actually had Jordan Peterson as a professor in Canada, in the 90s. He tried to teach us about Post Modernism. I and many others were also taking film 101. Petersons descriptions were so confusing that when we studied post modern film, the film prof has to schedule extra weekend lectures to un teach the garbage peterson taught and reteach the correct concepts of post modernism. The university had to discipline peterson for teaching garbage.
I actually had Jordan Peterson as a professor in Canada, in the 90s. He tried to teach us about Post Modernism. I and many others were also taking film 101. Petersons descriptions were so confusing that when we studied post modern film, the film prof has to schedule extra weekend lectures to un teach the garbage peterson taught and reteach the correct concepts of post modernism. The university had to discipline peterson for teaching garbage.
Best ways to organize the thoughts based on shared theory... every thing revolves around fundamental, once connect the subjects with fundamental concept that evolved and build and organize them...
This is similar to how I think, I refer to it as a mind quilt, it’s as though I’m stitching together a giant quilt and when I learn something I stitch it into the quilt where it belongs, and it comes suddenly almost as light bulb moment and I stitch it in.
I have Aspie. What he describes is how my brain works. I call it „thinking in contexts”. The information gets in and is assigned to contexts that have parameters matching that information. They form bigger contexts and get hydrated with new params that have high probability of being true to that context. Oh, here’s a good example: the information is like a firebolt. If you play some slomo videos of storms you’ll know what I mean. The firebolt spreads and if finds a connection, it unloads. Brain is electricity too, now that I think of it. Anyway, thinking in contexts works ;)
He relates to life.. this is the best way to teach children.. they ask why tell tell them .. explain everything they want and let them figure out the rest on their own .. that’s how you end up with quick thinking.. you have to think for yourself. And be able to ask questions and decide the answer and outcome for yourself By making connections to your life and experiences. Then the information is easier to understand and decipher. This man is brilliant!
He's describing his "mind palace". A concept I read about in Sherlock that the BBC added into the show, which I thought was wonderfully done. I've never heard of someone irl having a mind palace. JP is astounding. 😊
Someone talked about boxes in rooms in a house, as your knowledge grows, your house grows, and the rooms and the number of boxes. I thought it was an interesting concept for increasing recollection
Who else is also working on a software to make such a "comprehensive working theory approach useful"? I can certainly relate to Jordan in this aspect and would love to get started publishing these 50 hours in my twenties
Peterson is able to compartmentalize with precision. A natural librarian. He sorts and categorizes, using subject to pigeonhole. In a sense, his thinking is like chain lightning, tying topics and references together into different pathways with each addition supporting the other in any argument or lessons, going places that few think to go. I don’t always like him or agree with him, but he’s brilliant, and that’s enough.
Ok but if he just adds ideas and concepts to his already established theory how does he avoid biases in his interpretations of those ideas and concepts. Because its seems to me that if you read most things with a strong idea in mind you're very likely to completely distort those readings to fit your narrative, which is not a good way to approach knowledge.
Not necessarily, the difference between him and most people is hes willing to change or throw away ideas if theyre bad or theres some other information that would change. But regardless of what the information itself says that may prove or disprove the theory. The slot it goes it is still the same.
That is the secret to intelligence. Its not knowing things, its not being great at math or chess. Its the ability to more quickly combine data into correct conclusions, to combine things others would not have thought of to create something new or better.
I read a definition on intelligence once... It was like the ability to understand and conclude patterns for life.... And what jordan says proves that definition...
This is how I deny when my peers assume I'm super smart just because I've studied hours for an exam and got a higher score. I worked my ass off, those were not knowledge naturally stuck in my brain. That's how you eliminate unecessary expectations and situations where you have prove something you do not have.
My son has a fantastic memory. I wouldn't say photographic memory, but maybe Eidetic memory. He amazes me and knew 100s of different cars make and model by the time he was 1. He started watching top gear at 9 months old, and absolutely went crazy on cars. He still name's all the cars we walk past and he's 6 now. He loves the old presenters more than the new.
I actually had Jordan Peterson as a professor in Canada, in the 90s. He tried to teach us about Post Modernism. I and many others were also taking film 101. Petersons descriptions were so confusing that when we studied post modern film, the film prof has to schedule extra weekend lectures to un teach the garbage peterson taught and reteach the correct concepts of post modernism. The university had to discipline peterson for teaching garbage.
This content represents a significant journey of intellectual and personal enlightenment. Reading a book with akin content was a pivotal and enlightening experience. "A Life Unplugged: Reclaiming Reality in a Digital Age" by Theodore Blaze
When we listen to people like this, with this much knowledge and such a good vocabulary, we instantly admire and want to be more like them than athletes, actors or singers 😂
I have what I believe to be a photographic memory, although I am no savant with it. If I get a blink of an image I can probably paint it nearly spot on. However, I have asked several well read people if when they read does that become a memory in writing or is the scene that the writing spills out become the memory. Most have told me they see it in words. And this baffles me. Take this paragraph and tell me what you see when you close your eyes. "The sun shone through the blinds leaving a buttermilk yellow on the floor as I walked through the room. The striped pattern from the blinds shadows being cast on the floor. It lead me to the fridge like a walkway." When you read that, does it leave you wanting more? Does it paint a picture in your mind and become the memory of what was read? Or do you only see it in words? Maybe let's add something. A detective enters an apartment and thinks, "the door jam was kicked in, fresh brake on the wood jam, body lays motionless in the livingroom. There is a blood trail leading from the top of the steps, down them, and into the kitchen just passed the body on the floor." Do you feel that? Do you see that scene written about? Or do you only see the words? I'm curious.
The interviewer needed to shut up and ask the question 😅
Ik XD
The interviewer did a fine job. It's how he thinks
@@PagesofWisdom313 my thought exactly.
I can't stand the interviewer. He also sounds like every pastor ever.
This is a short CZcams edited for a quick view. So he's not really jumping in or cutting Peterson in any way I would assume only
"Do you have photographic memory?"
"OK how about now?"
LOL
you funny
😆😆😆
Lmao😂
lolllllllll(on pc) emoji take time
Some interviewers just like the sound of their own voice a little too much
Jumping to conclusions at it's finest
Have you ever watched a valuetainment interview before?
@@Dr.Spooky No. Judging by context I assume that’s a good thing?
@@Dr.Spooky yes, he still talks too much.
Ironically the first lesson in how to interview is to let the other person elaborate freely
I bet that interviewer made a bet with someone that JP had photographic memory
Is that a play on words or just a coincidence? Lol
But I think that he didn’t
The bet was hefty for sure lmao 🤣
@@Ikthus hahaha For Sure and he damn Lost😅😅
Nah pbd is just like that
Jordan: No I'm not like that.
Interviewer: Well I kinda think you are.
Jordan: But I'm not.
Interviewer: I don't think so.
Lol
Interviewer was pretty annoying even in that shirt clip.
🙄🙄😬🤔😂😂
I know right…? As if then interviewer knows what goes on in Jordan’s brain. I can’t stop laughing
Hahaha! So funny.
Being a student of Jordan Peterson and Just listening to How Jordan Peterson talks and thinks it's clear he does not have a photographic memory which makes him even more extraordinary
Do you know how we can ask him questions?
Is he still giving lectures?
He has interesting things to say at times, but if strays into other fields that are not his areas of expertise all the time. If you look at what experts in those fields have to say about his claims in those areas, they’re frequently wrong. He’s really not all he’s cracked out to be
imagine listening to his psychotic ramblings and finding them extraordinary
Lucky you!!! He is an extra ordinary man. I wish I had the honour of being his student :)
Jordan Peterson just made me appreciate my own brain. What he described and physically acted out is how my own brain organizes things but I have so often tried to make it work differently. I also appreciate how he didn’t let the other guy tell him how his own brain worked; he stuck with what he knew about himself to be true.
He has a contextual memory as he makes those connections he is building extra pathway to that knowledge and connecting it to his overall context.
Very well put. I think you explained it very simply.
No, he has a strict ideology and belief system, and he makes note of things that support that belief system and discards things that don't. It's called confirmation bias.
@@heldinahtmlhellreally what evidence do you have to make a claim like that? There are many time where Jordan has stated that he has changed his mind, was surprised by the results, etc. there is also evidence that this information has altered his theory as well. So where do you get off with your claim.
That's what he's saying. And he's a religious nut who believes in a fictional being and scripture. @@mauzeking6661
@@heldinahtmlhell I can see how it seems like that's what he said, but I disagree. He plugs things he disagrees with into the theory as well, and if the results are unexpected, he changes the theory
I could tell this is how JBP thinks.
I've developed the same way with programming. Everything self directed and incorporated into a a sort of working model. Each new piece of info is either plugged in to expand the model, or the model adapts. Once you have this model, you can easily pull from it to answer questions, or just talk for hours as you explore different sections.
This this this thank you! Wanted to comment something like you said but couldn’t find the words.
So… HOW??
Never felt this understood before i swear
Does this process transcend professions and academics? Say if you have such a system for approaching a profession, that in itself is a micro compartment in a larger approach to life that also runs similarly.
@@ElvisismI reason to believe so. The model encapsulates all knowledge learned almost like a 3D puzzle. I want to know what lectures he’s referring to.
I cracked up at him trying to convince jordan that he has a photographic memory
I find a good way to remember information is to think of how you would explain it to someone else. It seems more personal after that and that seems to help.
This guy had to hear Peterson say no 8 times before he shut his mouth and let the interviewee speak and clarify what he does actually think. This guy has no business interviewing Katy Perry, much less Jordan Peterson
it was scientifically proven that this interviewer doesn't know when to shut up.
But can you say, "Page 73..."? I thought you for sure had a photographic memory.
Sounds like "mind mapping", thus it seems highly plausible.
Wow!!!! That’s actually very helpful insight! I also think I’m doing it on my walls… just now realized it.
So…basically, I AM Jordan Peterson! 😂😂😆😆
He said he put his theory online can any one name it
He treats his mind like an infinite puzzle not a photo library it’s the way we gotta do it because we have limited ram and gotta be imaginative to solidify the importance of the information to recall it in a more thought out way
That’s more or less how I read non fiction books! I love the way he articulates it. You can easily retain far more info by categorization of different aspects of the information itself!
How does one begin thinking the same way?
The photographic memory thing is amusing because it's indicative of how people who do not think like us, often perceive intelligence, and intellectualism, etc. So it shows how far they are in perceiving the true nature of such thought as ours.
There's a large difference in possessing knowledge, and attaining understanding, and evaluating new thoughts, to flesh out the comprehension of reality, in all it's dimensions. So that the new take hold, and the old pass away.
“Like us” yea alright
Well put
@@regerbryan You seem insecure. Strange that you don't realize that there are some quite intelligent people using this site. Learn some humility
What it seems like is that this person you're criticizing isn't shouting his intelligence but instead just stating a fact. Not every one in the comments section is average or an idiot. I get the sense that the OP is neither
@@brandonpham8587 lmao no it wasn't.
@@regerbryan Abstract thinkers. If you want me to simplify it for you, it's scoring high in a personality trait called "openness." There are also subcategories of openness, which you can look up further.
The way you understand things have to have some relevance, in that the concept you are discovering has to slot in with the general knowledge you already have, rather than being pure detail. This is what makes it abstract, and what I could probably even say is opposite to remembering specific details.
It is somewhat ignorant that some people could think being high in openness in this particular manner means that you have photographic memory. The two are not remotely the same. And as I explained earlier, could probably even be called opposites.
Kant gives same advice: ask yourself "how can I categorize thing that I just have learned?"
This back and forth was very amusing
Smart, articulate & handsome... Wow
I think the same way! It's like making an abstract model of your understanding and it's like a puzzle where each piece can be extrapolated.
Some people build the boarders, some start with a corner, some the center, and others make groups of familiar images. The crazy thing is each skill or specific understanding has a breadth and depth since history is continual.
(Although this isn't how it looks in my head it works as a model)
Imagine making a THICK puzzle about 7 inches thick per peice and every inch is another color in a rainbow 🌈 . All the pieces have the same pattern of color. Color represents both age and discovery (who did what and when). Each piece represents a subject we either experience or soon acknowledge
I am like that too. I think what’s he’s affectively saying is he understands “the meaning” > the content; the meaning becomes part of his map. For example, I’ve always had this problem: When I took literature writing classes in college I could write an essay that told you the exact meaning of the story - why it was written, what the characters represent, how the author is using them to make arguments - but I definitely wouldn’t be able to tell you random Jeopardy facts about the book. It’s really the difference between “synthesizing”information (extrapolating the meaning) vs. retaining the content (jeopardy facts).
Plugging knowledge into your own working model is a great way to go
Every person is like that. He articulated it perfectly. Everyone is gradually building a theory. I was doing absolutely the same for the last couple of years and now he just explained to me what I was doing
Yes, I perceive and process basically the same as JP.
I always refer to my unifying theory as he sort of states it, as my jigsaw puzzle.
All experience, all information, I receive, I search for then reorganize and place the pieces to form the picture of all things together. There's always a place for everything, and nothing is left out. And I look at all layers of a thing, and try to understand their essence, and the fabric of all.
I see patterns in the pieces, and how every piece fits together, or at least that's the goal. It's a constant process, and my mind is often lost to the effort, and enjoyment of the process.
It's both straining, and highly enjoyable at times. I often know and understand things before others, and in deeper and further reaching ways.
I often am able to solve problems that others aren't even aware of, or if they are, in ways they do not consider.
I see answers that can only be seen, if you can see the grand picture.
I also recognize that my strength and ability therein, is both a gift, and curse, and that all forms of intelligence, and ability, have their important places, and roles.
I see myself as a speaker, a philosopher, an artist, an advisor, a problem solver, an innovator, a consultant, a visionary, etcetera.
I am one whose greatest work is on ideas and concepts, so from the outside it may seem that I do little work at all, but it hardly stops internally.
TI linked with SI.
@@jhinthevirtuoso4886 What's that?
I've come up INTP each time I did Myers Briggs test.
@@Frejborg Myers Briggs is pretty shit cognitive functions, and the type grid are more accurate to type yourself with.
@@Frejborg You have a massively over inflated ego, as well as delusions of grandeur. Seek therapy, I recommend cognitive behavioral therapy so you can learn the causes of your ego mania
Oh I love this. And I feel so happy, I think that I think like that too . That makes him look even more human. And that's make listening to him easier.
I Love How Jordan pull things together!!!
It's funny because the way he organizes himself is how I am studying his works 😅
I resonate so much with peterson and the way he takes in knowledge too
I love Jordan petersen
It takes a pretty comprehensive understanding of things to be able to categorize concepts accurately like so. Kudos for your tenacity and drive to come to such wisdom.
Watching how he remains on point and doesn’t lose his thoughts are what I was watching for. He is charming kind and intelligent.
So a theory that dr peterson has been working on for a longtime ! .. it always makes me smile if he says this .. i like that
He is doing what most of us are doing, he is just smarter and more focused on it for whatever reasons.
He is adding to his schema just as everyone does with ideas. It just so happens that he is extraordinary well read and smart, so his schema is far more sophisticated than most people's. .
Valuetainment is top 5 podcasts on YT…. Especially the episode with Yeonmi Park.
Just a tidbit of information the "interviewer" is Patrick bet David and if you go to the full video you won't find anyone who says that he cuts Jordan off and asks him a million times about this. Because in the greater context of the conversation makes it obvious that it's not the case and this video cut out about 30% of this specific part of the conversation making it seem like he is cutting him off and being very persistent but due to the cuts and what seems to be a slight speed up i can see how it would give you that idea
Jordan Peterson is fascinating to listen to as so,some who loves psychology
I actually had Jordan Peterson as a professor in Canada, in the 90s. He tried to teach us about Post Modernism. I and many others were also taking film 101. Petersons descriptions were so confusing that when we studied post modern film, the film prof has to schedule extra weekend lectures to un teach the garbage peterson taught and reteach the correct concepts of post modernism. The university had to discipline peterson for teaching garbage.
Jordan Peterson is incredibly humble. So many people would just go, "oh well maybe I might be a bit of a god in that way 😅"
I actually had Jordan Peterson as a professor in Canada, in the 90s. He tried to teach us about Post Modernism. I and many others were also taking film 101. Petersons descriptions were so confusing that when we studied post modern film, the film prof has to schedule extra weekend lectures to un teach the garbage peterson taught and reteach the correct concepts of post modernism. The university had to discipline peterson for teaching garbage.
Best ways to organize the thoughts based on shared theory... every thing revolves around fundamental, once connect the subjects with fundamental concept that evolved and build and organize them...
Jordan applies knowledge holisticly.
Same as you uncle Jordan :-)
These two men are two Oscar winning actors. These bastards.
why are you so bitter hahahahahahahaha
They are also more capable than you in things that matter in our world
You’re on to something bud
@@MildlyHumorous-cq1nn think before you act. Your words will change if you see the reality.
@@ZafaryabWaheed ironic, you should take your own advice.
Jordon is such a brilliant mind. He is humble about it too
This is similar to how I think, I refer to it as a mind quilt, it’s as though I’m stitching together a giant quilt and when I learn something I stitch it into the quilt where it belongs, and it comes suddenly almost as light bulb moment and I stitch it in.
I have Aspie. What he describes is how my brain works. I call it „thinking in contexts”. The information gets in and is assigned to contexts that have parameters matching that information. They form bigger contexts and get hydrated with new params that have high probability of being true to that context.
Oh, here’s a good example: the information is like a firebolt. If you play some slomo videos of storms you’ll know what I mean. The firebolt spreads and if finds a connection, it unloads.
Brain is electricity too, now that I think of it. Anyway, thinking in contexts works ;)
I’d love to understand more about this. Have you always thought like this or was it learned? If so, what sources?
Two of my favourite guys!
He relates to life.. this is the best way to teach children.. they ask why tell tell them .. explain everything they want and let them figure out the rest on their own .. that’s how you end up with quick thinking.. you have to think for yourself. And be able to ask questions and decide the answer and outcome for yourself By making connections to your life and experiences. Then the information is easier to understand and decipher.
This man is brilliant!
My way of thinking exactly 🤩 somebody gets it
I’m like that too, the theory of our world
Like a mind mapping, and that theory in the middle. Then branching new knowledge one by one. Pretty interesting.
He's describing his "mind palace". A concept I read about in Sherlock that the BBC added into the show, which I thought was wonderfully done. I've never heard of someone irl having a mind palace. JP is astounding. 😊
Hey.. Can I watch that episode without spoiling the entire show for me?
Someone talked about boxes in rooms in a house, as your knowledge grows, your house grows, and the rooms and the number of boxes. I thought it was an interesting concept for increasing recollection
Exactly, you have a working functional knowledge and you remember things because they’re connected to other things. It’s like a storyteller’s memory.
Ohh !!! Thats how my brain works too!! I have the big theory and I keep adding unto it !
Who else is also working on a software to make such a "comprehensive working theory approach useful"?
I can certainly relate to Jordan in this aspect and would love to get started publishing these 50 hours in my twenties
As long as it’s not conformation bias. We also need to let our awareness stand sentinel at the gates of our perception
That's how I organize my information too
Peterson is able to compartmentalize with precision. A natural librarian. He sorts and categorizes, using subject to pigeonhole. In a sense, his thinking is like chain lightning, tying topics and references together into different pathways with each addition supporting the other in any argument or lessons, going places that few think to go. I don’t always like him or agree with him, but he’s brilliant, and that’s enough.
Wow, that is a Crazy Intellect Dr
WTF I literally organize my knowledge the same way, first time I hear someone mention that style of thinking
The definition of introverted intuition
What mbtis have that?
@@KGS922 All the NJ's and SP's
You guys understand this video is highly edited and the original is propably way diffrent
I kinda know that strategy I also use it
It is using an ideal model that fits everything
I just want to say that I admire Jordan’s suit 😆 dude has a good dress code
Me too Jordan. Me too.
This guy is so smart
I know the harvard professor in question personally and I can confirm he indeed has a memory just as described by Jordan. It is remarkable.
Ok but if he just adds ideas and concepts to his already established theory how does he avoid biases in his interpretations of those ideas and concepts. Because its seems to me that if you read most things with a strong idea in mind you're very likely to completely distort those readings to fit your narrative, which is not a good way to approach knowledge.
Not necessarily, the difference between him and most people is hes willing to change or throw away ideas if theyre bad or theres some other information that would change. But regardless of what the information itself says that may prove or disprove the theory. The slot it goes it is still the same.
The guy interviewing him is a doer, not a thinker.
He’s an NFT charlatan
@@bigmyke2008 he is ?
Yes and he’s worth over 100,000,000 dollars, which is because doers do the most and get the most. I say this as a thinker…
@@jakeb6043 Yes, I meant no insult.
There are some people try to be famous by interviewing famous and popular people.
He explained Extraverted intuition clearly. Hes an infj
Thank God I have the same approach..and the same path. I am not lost!
JP is blessed with having an above-average IQ. That helps a lot.
It’s all about making connections.
That is the secret to intelligence. Its not knowing things, its not being great at math or chess. Its the ability to more quickly combine data into correct conclusions, to combine things others would not have thought of to create something new or better.
I read a definition on intelligence once... It was like the ability to understand and conclude patterns for life.... And what jordan says proves that definition...
I use the same approach - theory connectivity.
This is how I deny when my peers assume I'm super smart just because I've studied hours for an exam and got a higher score. I worked my ass off, those were not knowledge naturally stuck in my brain. That's how you eliminate unecessary expectations and situations where you have prove something you do not have.
He's referring to the Context Map. I have the same methodology.
The interviewer talks too DAMN MUCH 😂
Yay difference people, learn it!
Love ❤️
I love Japes.
My son has a fantastic memory. I wouldn't say photographic memory, but maybe Eidetic memory. He amazes me and knew 100s of different cars make and model by the time he was 1. He started watching top gear at 9 months old, and absolutely went crazy on cars. He still name's all the cars we walk past and he's 6 now. He loves the old presenters more than the new.
He basically described a memory palace. Where the palace is his theory.
People that have photographic memory are really smart
I actually had Jordan Peterson as a professor in Canada, in the 90s. He tried to teach us about Post Modernism. I and many others were also taking film 101. Petersons descriptions were so confusing that when we studied post modern film, the film prof has to schedule extra weekend lectures to un teach the garbage peterson taught and reteach the correct concepts of post modernism. The university had to discipline peterson for teaching garbage.
No, he doesn't have a photographic memory. He has a thinking memory, which is tenfold more amazing...
I also thought he had a photographic memory.
The interviewer!! Geeezzz. Listennn
He just explained his theory while talking about his theory
Introverted intuition
I organize my knowledge just like that
This content represents a significant journey of intellectual and personal enlightenment. Reading a book with akin content was a pivotal and enlightening experience. "A Life Unplugged: Reclaiming Reality in a Digital Age" by Theodore Blaze
When we listen to people like this, with this much knowledge and such a good vocabulary, we instantly admire and want to be more like them than athletes, actors or singers 😂
💯 Exactly
Well said Peterson
Jordan Peterson has made being brilliant sexy and hip!!
I have what I believe to be a photographic memory, although I am no savant with it. If I get a blink of an image I can probably paint it nearly spot on. However, I have asked several well read people if when they read does that become a memory in writing or is the scene that the writing spills out become the memory. Most have told me they see it in words. And this baffles me.
Take this paragraph and tell me what you see when you close your eyes.
"The sun shone through the blinds leaving a buttermilk yellow on the floor as I walked through the room. The striped pattern from the blinds shadows being cast on the floor. It lead me to the fridge like a walkway."
When you read that, does it leave you wanting more? Does it paint a picture in your mind and become the memory of what was read? Or do you only see it in words?
Maybe let's add something.
A detective enters an apartment and thinks, "the door jam was kicked in, fresh brake on the wood jam, body lays motionless in the livingroom. There is a blood trail leading from the top of the steps, down them, and into the kitchen just passed the body on the floor."
Do you feel that? Do you see that scene written about? Or do you only see the words?
I'm curious.