@lucashc2 yeah and I guess they could mount the caliper to the part that the little wheels are mounted. I was more just mentioning that they didnt build it in this design to show it can be done. Not to many people want a centerless rim with no brakes.
It needs to be able to collect its own energy back into a refreshing system making the ride easier. It would be Sorenson on itself, how many times practically wind up energy to help reeled more easier peddling power.
A single "giant" ring of bearings would cost thousands of dollars, are not readily available, have to be custom made, and would still be much more vulnerable to failure and seizing. 3-4 smaller bearings or pairs of bearing would cost a only a few hundred dollars and not be anywhere near as fault prone.
and at the end of the day its still a hub just a bigger hub with a hole in the middle if it was hubless it would just be a tyre rolling down the street lol
YOU KNOW WHAT ? BEING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS YOU SHOULD TAKE A GOOD LOOK AT WHAT YOUR TRYING TO SHOW . NOW I'M JUST A SIMPLE MECHANIC AND CAN SEE SOMEONE REINVENTING THE WHEEL TO SOMETHING UNUSABLE IN EVERYDAY LIFE , AND A GREAT ENERGY HOG.THIS CONCEPT,IF I CAN FILL IN WHAT'S MISSING ,COULD HAVE USE IN BIG HIGH TORQUE MACHINERY , OTHERWISE WHAT YOU GAIN IN COOL , YOU LOSE IN COIN. GIANFRANCO FRONZI SEPTEMBER
Why would you bother? you preplacea device that had one set of centralized high speed bearings with either one HUGE, heavier, more expensive bearing or in this case, it appears that you have THREE bearing sets. That's poor engineering if you ask me... Increased parts number and complexity is not good design. The reason motorcycle drivetrains aren't like this is because it is inferior.
YOU KNOW WHAT ? BEING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS YOU SHOULD TAKE A GOOD LOOK AT WHAT YOUR TRYING TO SHOW . NOW I'M JUST A SIMPLE MECHANIC AND CAN SEE SOMEONE REINVENTING THE WHEEL TO SOMETHING UNUSABLE IN EVERYDAY LIFE , AND A GREAT ENERGY HOG.THIS CONCEPT,IF I CAN FILL IN WHAT'S MISSING ,COULD HAVE USE IN BIG HIGH TORQUE MACHINERY , OTHERWISE WHAT YOU GAIN IN COO , YOU LOSE IN COIN. GIANFRANCO FRONZI SEPTEMBER
@lucashc2 yeah and I guess they could mount the caliper to the part that the little wheels are mounted. I was more just mentioning that they didnt build it in this design to show it can be done. Not to many people want a centerless rim with no brakes.
What is the beauty of this design? What is the improvement on ?
You can do laundry with that design.
@brad8taylor A centerless disc brake would do, problem it would need to be almost the size of the wheel.
It needs to be able to collect its own energy back into a refreshing system making the ride easier. It would be Sorenson on itself, how many times practically wind up energy to help reeled more easier peddling power.
A single "giant" ring of bearings would cost thousands of dollars, are not readily available, have to be custom made, and would still be much more vulnerable to failure and seizing. 3-4 smaller bearings or pairs of bearing would cost a only a few hundred dollars and not be anywhere near as fault prone.
Why is this called Hubless ? centreless maybe, the tyre is fitted to a wheel hub
It clearly has a hub
How to do big sprocket.
I didnt see how the brakes were going to be done.
and at the end of the day its still a hub just a bigger hub with a hole in the middle if it was hubless it would just be a tyre rolling down the street lol
YOU KNOW WHAT ? BEING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS YOU SHOULD TAKE A GOOD LOOK AT WHAT YOUR TRYING TO SHOW . NOW I'M JUST A SIMPLE MECHANIC AND CAN SEE SOMEONE REINVENTING THE WHEEL TO SOMETHING UNUSABLE IN EVERYDAY LIFE , AND A GREAT ENERGY HOG.THIS CONCEPT,IF I CAN FILL IN WHAT'S MISSING ,COULD HAVE USE IN BIG HIGH TORQUE MACHINERY , OTHERWISE WHAT YOU GAIN IN COOL , YOU LOSE IN COIN.
GIANFRANCO FRONZI SEPTEMBER
Why are all the comments with these kinda videos so up the ass with this concept?
Why would you bother? you preplacea device that had one set of centralized high speed bearings with either one HUGE, heavier, more expensive bearing or in this case, it appears that you have THREE bearing sets. That's poor engineering if you ask me... Increased parts number and complexity is not good design. The reason motorcycle drivetrains aren't like this is because it is inferior.
just buy a big bearing and mount it on a frame, put a wheel around it and you're done. such a big deal about these stupid hubless wheel vids
YOU KNOW WHAT ? BEING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS YOU SHOULD TAKE A GOOD LOOK AT WHAT YOUR TRYING TO SHOW . NOW I'M JUST A SIMPLE MECHANIC AND CAN SEE SOMEONE REINVENTING THE WHEEL TO SOMETHING UNUSABLE IN EVERYDAY LIFE , AND A GREAT ENERGY HOG.THIS CONCEPT,IF I CAN FILL IN WHAT'S MISSING ,COULD HAVE USE IN BIG HIGH TORQUE MACHINERY , OTHERWISE WHAT YOU GAIN IN COO , YOU LOSE IN COIN.
GIANFRANCO FRONZI SEPTEMBER