For the Land Is Mine [DVD RESTORED]

This is a restored DVD rip of the For the Land is Mine propaganda short film which I mirrored in 2018. The original upload was a lower quality edited copy of two parts shared by Nate Blair.
This version was ripped directly from the Back Home Pictures DVD release and features the following improvements:
Audio & Video Sync
Max Peak Gain Normalized
Two-Level Noise Reduction
Interpolated Frame Blending
Color Corrected for Whites & Skin Tones
Preserved Bitrate, Aspect Ratio, & Continuity
& other miscellaneous tweaks
NOTE: I'm aware that it could be improved even further, I may do so at a later date.
Original Description: "Old propaganda film about the progressive idea known as 'Georgism', after Henry George (also 'geoism'). Sharing economic rents from common and natural resources with value capture systems such as land value 'tax' would protect the environment and eliminate poverty."
Nate Blair: / @johnsnow5534
Back Home Pictures: backhomepictures.com

[@phokas260]

georgism is super based

[@catninja909]

CZcams needs more content of this calibrr

[@PsyFenEX]

Ah yes content at last

[@Spider-man61641]

Based and redpilled?

[@salokin3087]

Based

[@VincentW2]

Very interesting

[@econogate]

Uncle Ted approves this vidya my sons.

[@learrus]

Technology breeds unemployment through automation.

[@schumanhuman]

I remember seeing this, probably on Nate's channel. Pretty good if very much a product of it;s time. Reminds me aesthetically of 'Kentucky fried movie - United appeal for the dead'
czcams.com/video/CF2ZhY8xX_w/video.html

[@AriCircuit]

Touching children is bad

[@Zero_Contradictions]

The stuff said around 16:00 about how Americans at the time largely disapproved about the Alaskan Purchase is historically inaccurate. To quote from the Wikipedia article on the Alaskan Purchase:
"Many Americans believed in 1867 that the purchase process had been corrupt,[14] but W. H. Dall in 1872 wrote that, "there can be no doubt that the feelings of a majority of the citizens of the United States are in favor of it."[17] The notion that the purchase was unpopular among Americans is, a scholar wrote 120 years later, "one of the strongest historical myths in American history. It persists despite conclusive evidence to the contrary, and the efforts of the best historians to dispel it", likely in part because it fits American and Alaskan writers' view of the territory as distinct and filled with self-reliant pioneers.[13] "

[@cosmicapple9921]

Ah yes, Wikipedia, very trusted

[@Zero_Contradictions]

@@cosmicapple9921 Right, because some guy with a political agenda who didn't cite any historical sources is more trustworthy than all of these academic sources that debunk the myth:
Cook, Mary Alice (Spring 2011). "Manifest Opportunity: The Alaska Purchase as a Bridge Between United States Expansion and Imperialism" (PDF). Alaska History. 26 (1): 1-10.
Haycox, Stephen (1990). "Truth and Expectation: Myth in Alaska History". Northern Review. 6: 59-82. Retrieved August 31, 2015.
Dall, W. H. (1872). "Is Alaska a Paying Investment". Harper's New Monthly Magazine. NY: Harper & Brothers. XLIV: 252.
Neunherz, R. E. (1989). ""Hemmed In": Reactions in British Columbia to the Purchase of Russian America". The Pacific Northwest Quarterly. 80 (3): 101-111. JSTOR 40491056.

[@Zero_Contradictions]

@@cosmicapple9921 Bottom Line: Don't be a doofus. You have an embarrassing lack of critical thinking skills if you're going to trust a commonly parroted myth over what the primary sources say themselves.

[@_SimpleSam]

Literal Communism.

[@threeblindchickens]

based