Pulsar Krypton FXG50 VS InfiRay Clip CH50W - Accuracy Test

To be fair, both the FXG50 and CH50W used no less than 4 bullets to verify their accuracy. It can be seen from the results this time that both products can hit the target with good accuracy. But it seems that the accuracy of the CH50W is more reliable.
This does not mean that the FXG50 is not accurate enough, it may also be that I did not adjust the shooting height well at the beginning.

[@khalidhissy3140]

Great vedio!!! Looks like the CH50W dropped out of position and tilted down touching the barrel. Is this something to be concerned about or you did not tighten the clamp well enough.

[@johnporter897]

Need to shoot a group before adding 2 to see the difference

[@picopejerrey]

What is the name of the bench rest you are using???? Great video!!!!

[@mnephillips]

Please could I have a link to the thermal patches you were using?
Cheers
Tom

[@FebtopChannel]

Nice

[@XX-fq8kp]

WOW IT LOOKS SO SUNNY WITH THE SCOPE

[@garypostell5268]

Is this supposed to like night vision?

[@thomasnightviking5605]

Both of them are thermal clip-on. At night, the target is captured based on the heat radiated by the animal. Not a digital night vision product.

[@matthewnobby6789]

The last shot with the ch50w come loose

[@myadventureman2636]

Nice