G. Edward Griffin: The Individual at the Center of the State
Vložit
- čas přidán 26. 08. 2024
- #thewealthstandardpodcast
/ channel
Writer and a documentary film producer, G. Edward Griffin shares sensible insights about individualism and takes us through a deeper understanding of capitalism.
FREE ACCESS to The Perpetual Wealth Strategy
eLearn to Achieve Financial Independence: goo.gl/u4rnLk
#gedwardgriffin #individualism #capitalism
Let's Connect:
The Wealth Standard Podcast: thewealthstand...
Patrick Donohoe's Book, Heads I Win, Tails You Lose: headsortailsiw...
May God Bless this man who did so much to expose the evil in the United States.
amen
That moment when you realize everything about Joe McCarthy and the Rosenbergs they taught you in elementary school was pro-communist propaganda...
@@Women_RockTHIS!
I just learned of Mr. Griffin this past week from a 1969 documentary.
I was very impressed.
Thank you Mr. Griffin, for your insights. Much appreciation.
Same. I was amazed by that 1969 lecture he gave on revolution. It really fits into what's going on now. If you haven't already read it, look for article called Lockstep and then read over Event 201. X Clade is another one that covers this planned-demic.
Same here. Very impressed at this man.
@@MsLoverofTruth look for Yuri Bezmenov and Charlotte Iserbyte on CZcams. Griffin is good at teaching fundamentals. Those two give additional insights.
@@MsLoverofTruth another interview of his: czcams.com/video/YUYCBfmIcHM/video.html
This guy is a legend in my book.
Calm, collected, composed, wise and so eloquent. I truly appreciate this gentleman.
Best explanation of individualism Ive ever seen.... i had no idea... why havent i heard about this man before today....!!! Gggrrrrrrrrrrrr !!
And now you can never unhear.
That's because he copyright strikes everyone else publishing his material.
I first heard of G Edward Griffin 10 years or so ago. Very smart guy, but if you want to go the next step of a fully integrated philosophy then I can only reccomend Ayn Rand. Reason being is this: conventional dichotomy of morality is incompatible with individualism. A proper integrated philisophy can not simply be "well im an individualist politically, but ethically im a collectivist." THAT is why freedom is being eroded.
I hope you’ve listened to his audiobook on here called The Creature From Jekyll Island. It explains EVERYTHING and clearly shows where we’re headed and who’s driving and why. Heaven help us. April 2023 and we may have to break out the pitchforks and torches.
Yes I absolutely agree for you to hear the audio of the creature from Jekyll Island it amazes me that he probably did that class in 93 or so. But in 93 he knew exactly what he was talkin about buy them owning all of the media all of your organization's having control of EVERYTHING
GEG is legend.
Yes! His legacy will live through all of us
AMEN
Mr.Griffin is amazing....best..
Edward Griffin is a very wise man.
Excellent conversation! A must watch for anyone loving freedom! Thank you gentlemen for sharing!!
Awesome interview. No one has a right to impose their will on anyone else, period.
I agree
Man, I wish *I* had friends like this. It'd be fun to banter about this sorta stuff.
In my life experience: You can either give people handouts to help them out but this tends to create dependence and resentment (that their not getting enough handouts) or you can help people by listening and encouraging people to succeed on their own so they learn how to care for themselves and their family. The result of the latter is independence, freedom and pride. The former suggests that you think that people aren't capable of providing for themselves.
No good deed goes unpunished. Government assistance ie handouts has become a lifestyle. The more dependent people become, the more they want. I’ve been working since 12, on my own since 17, and own three small businesses and land and thank God every day I did it myself. I hate to growing hippie collective of freeloading bums that are dragging society down to the lowest common denominator. Same with gangsta culture and the ruination of the English language with Ebonics. Get your own, seek wise council, and invest in your own future.
I agree with Mr. Griffin about nearly all he says except for his optimism about the future. This society will fall just as so many others have, because of the internal moral collapse of the people.
@Terry G. Remember, all past civilization fell due to moral decay and abuse of power and the common good, which, to me, seems to be a law of life. And each time, there's a new rise of civilization, on and on and on. Until we learn to do things different. And when you make a difference, leaving your comfortable chair as a creature of habits, it will be the two of us, changing the world.
Axel Foil
& if we did have all dat, we'd sumhow b over-run by mongrelz!
History bears this out.
@@devonseamoor Aboriginals had a good way of living
Yup, and you’re labeled a racist or bigot if you call it for what it is. Individual accountability is lost. We have to unite and fight to take this fallen nation back. The tree of liberty needs watering…
Stumbled upon Mr. Griffin about 5 years ago. He's Great!!!
Use a less widescreen crop and make each side bigger. Good interview. Need to watch more of Mr Griffin
inscrutable this looks like a Zoom screen. If so, not
a lot of flexibility
@@darwinbarrett86Covid times
As a latino, I found out there's a huge misconception around the Western world which is that we, in the western world think that western society as a whole is not inclined toward colectivism and that we all fight for our individual liberties. In my opinion I would draw a line between Latin American and the countries with Latin origin from Europe on one hand, and the Anglosaxon countries of Europe and North America on the other hand. Unfortunately, because of our strong catholic background we were more inclined to colectivism than the Anglo saxon sphere and that brought us even more corruption and wide spread poverty.
Hi, I'm an Australian protestant and fascinated by your comment. This is something I've become interested in and was hoping you could expand on what you've said - how does Catholicism end up more collectivist than Protestantism? ...thank you...
Weve been blessed to have Mr Griffin fighting for freedom and battling the collectivists schemes since before it became a thing that was even understood to be such a danger to us all. thanks for helping to make this information known in such a critical time in human history. take care
When collectivism is broken down to it's core belief it is evolution. That is survival of the fittest. The lesser is overcome by the greater. Yes, it it evolution.
If you enjoyed this look up Eustace Mullins,he taught me about most of the topics before G,Edward Griffin.Always good to hear Ed speak though
Here I am in August 2020 still waiting for the links to be added...
Such a wise man. 👍👍👍👍
I believe and support the concept of "inalienable rights". We need however to consider "who and by what means" will these rights be defended and penforced? Enter the state,(in whatever form it is constituted) that, via laws, decrees, regulations, etc., begin's the process of defining and restricting those very rights. As Shakepeare's Hamlet said "now there's the rub"..
G Edward Griffin For President
I'm watching all of your videos.
Did you Watch "G. Edward Griffin 1969" on CZcams
czcams.com/video/klF4O5NH1gA/video.html
Money is the blood of a society. If the blood is infected so becomes the host.
Well, it was mentioned in The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. 10, published in 1906, pp. 490, that Mayer Amschel Rothschild was an agent of Prince William Landgrave IX of Hesse Cassel (also spelled as Kassel) who funded British Troops against The American Revolution. It is also mentioned in The Journals of The House of Commons published in 1803 that Prince William Landgrave IX of Hesse Kassel out of Germany married Princess Mary, the daughter of King George II from Great Britain. It is also mentioned through History Dot Com that The Royal Marriage Act of 1772 and Queen Victoria's Matchmaking led to Queen Victoria's nine children's 42 grand children---seven of them siting on thrones in, and I quote, "on European thrones in Russia, Greece, Romania, Britain, Germany, Spain and Norway-and all would take sides during World War I with disastrous consequences"
If you like to have a correct table of the Rothschild's go here: www.zum.de/whkmla/sp/1011/nemesis/nemesis1.html#bib
My great-grandparents were a part of this Movement we live here in Michigan and they got in trouble by the FBI by going to a church on the Eastside of Saginaw Michigan that was a Communist front. The church was located at a lower class neighborhood. I also have family members that worked for the u.s. government and their psychological warfare in Special forces programs. I also have family that still work for Russian government's. My history goes back into the special forces & the tsar of Russia.
A wonderful guest and video...
It's an interesting conversation and I agree with G. Edward Griffin wholeheartedly. At this moment in time, I'm finding myself in a huge clash between the Dutch attitude in life and the British attitude in life. The former looks at an issue pondering and making a choice, acting on it as well.
The latter finds itself in an issue, dramatizing it first to no end, wondering what it is and how one has a part in it, meanwhile turning its back onto the opposition, assuming that that's the guilty party. Asking oneself "Who am I and what is it in me that creates this issue?" NO WAY!! There's much unconsciousness in general, on this island. I assume it's due to bad food as well.
Great Live, congratulations
Yes yes. I forget I was a history major after listening to Ed G Ol’ boy the last few weeks
#POW CONNERY, SEAN
I like my individual rights.
I like freedom.
I dislike those who oppose basic constitutional governance.
I dislike those who oppose freedom.
I dislike communists.
I dislike people who think the government owes them something.
I dislike people who allow the government to control them their lives and opportunities.
I dislike people who do not help in society.
I ABSOLUTELY LOVE G EDWARD GRIFFIN
HE IS ONE OF MY HEROES.
I had to find a new hero.
I picked Bruce Jenner. RIP BRUCE
YOU ARE DEAD TO ME JENNER. I don’t see your new you. I dont look
I do not listen to the Kardashians
In my opinion the Kardashians killed my hero
“Bruce what happened?”
Great
Love Ed!
"Nothing succeed in government better than failure" Dalgast
I took PP class in 5th grade. They taught me mine was growing and changing and there's nothing wrong with that.
And now you're in 6th grade. Well it'll keep changing but it's normal
5:47 - Which books were those Mr. Griffin bought and read?
I think the POTUS should bring him in for advisor!
That would be incredibly wise. He could do a lot of good.
@@4barhigh He can help prevent radial left turn to socialism and communism.
35:45 ❤😊
edit
35:55🎉
Crusaders Assemble! ❤😊
REALITY ZONE - mentioned website by Griffin
Of course, who looks into past battles between France and Great Britain or Canada's History? Want me to explain that as well?
Yes well I'm 64 now I don't care About sport cars wealth but individual survival
you guys know how to run on the spot.
The National Health Service was like collectivist nationalist thing That was a good thing but now being fragmented by privatization which has led to compartmentalization and cut off points and fragmentation of a system that once worked.
GE Griffin should let people using his material without copyright striking small channels, he should know that nobody gives a shit about him personally, it's just because his discourse sounds in favor of the people that he's got the support of the people, but his actions with copyrighting are shameful.
What he creates is his property, not the states. He has to make a living also. Do you think anyone gives a shit about you? You must be a communist.
I will be checking out Freedom Force and doing what little I can. I have little but I do have a big mouth. We cannot just learn the truth and not pick up the torch in whatever way we can. The bell rung for me a long time ago, I know what he is saying but I did not understand about the Federal Reserve, that is really important, the root of the evil that is trying to take control, at least the financial root. Hit them where it hurts.
*I would very much like to see his thoughts about the latest **#BLM** **#Antifa** **#riots** **#looters*
I understand you wanting his opinion on BLM. Wondering why the other #s we're included in in the same inquiry.
It’s simple. They are all organizations of the socialist/communist wing. All protests are funded through socialist/communist front groups. They are doing exactly what they’ve been “hired” to do. If you follow the trail of money, the group or the organizers themselves, are usually associated with some socialist/communist organization. I was surprised to learn the native American keystone pipeline protests were organized by some ex Russian communists organization.
Uuuuuuh wisdom is understanding what aspect of civic life belong in individualism and what ought to go into collectivism.
Ie he quotes declarations of independence meanwhile the constitution starts we the people
The Constitution was the first coup
People are seeing truth?????
That’s why we are told over and over about our Democracy instead of our Constitutional Republic
A republic is a representative democracy.
@@syourke3
Again slowly
We are a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC
Difference is individual rights override what the majority decides is right or wrong
Example What the majority of a democracy decides slavery is okay?
@@williamstorms3262 It’s certainly possible to have a Constitutional Republic without the Constitution setting forth individual rights. In fact, the U S Constitution didn’t have a Bill of Rights until 1791.
Democracy simply means “rule by the people”, as opposed to rule by a monarch or an oligarchy or a tithed nobility, etc.. But “democracy” doesn’t describe a form of government whereas a “Constitutional Republic” is a form of government.
My point is simply this: again and again, I hear people say that “the USA is not a democracy, it’s a republic” (or a “Constitutional republic”), when, in fact, there is no contradiction between these terms. A “Constitutional Republic” simply denotes a particular form of democracy.
The Bill of Rights serves to limit the Constitutional powers of the federal government but it does not limit the democratic nature of the federal government which has greatly expanded since 1787.
Bottom line: Democracy and individual rights are not antithetical. They are, in fact, complementary. “Democracy” does not mean that a majority of the elected officials can do anything they want to do.
@@williamstorms3262 To respond to your hypothetical, “What if the majority decide slavery is OK?”, I should point out that chattel slavery was not abolished in the USA until passage of the 13th Amendment in 1865 and its it’s still legal to enslave persons convicted of crimes, i.e., prisoners.
@@syourke3
That’s weak at best.. But okay
Let’s say the majority of Americans decide we don’t really need due process to convict a suspect of a crime and incarcerate them or ‘enslave them’ as you put it?
Your point is missing the big picture anyway. We are supposed to be a nation of individual liberties that are god given and affirmed in the Constitution to prevent tyranny from governments. Especially our own.. This the wisdom that our framers knew from the history of every failed democracy before.
All boiled down. There are only two types of government For the collective or for the individual. We have as a nation forgotten what this great experiment was supposed to be
Copyright strikes on fellow truthers? That's disappointing.
a good idea in this video
would have been to talk about
the diktionari meaning of the word "capitalism"
in konjunktion with the korrektheori of "private property" sense...
I think the word "property" doesn't seem to exist?? in the diktionari's definition
Capitalism is a good idea as far as the personal property doesn't mean it to be the Whole Earth!
KKK
The one law of creation ... No sentient being has the right to interfere with the free will of another and violence is only acceptable in self defence.
And there you have it if defence forces of a nation state were only used to defend a nations borders there is the end of international conflict.
It's not rocket science and a beaut place to start.
The only things in life worth doing are what you can do for others which determines how we lived our lives the big question we are asked after we pass on.
Inalienable means 'God GIVEN'..., as in rights given...otherwise I agree w. 97% of what this guy says. He needs to be broadcast far & wide. There's a BIG REASON the powers that be have kept his words/work hidden away.
No, that's not what the word means. Nature is a much better term rather than God given. Nature itself implies what are correctly rights and is objective provable fact. God given requires a belief in the unseen, unproveable
Well What can we do about mate Give us The choices to avoid the leeches
3:20 awareness of the young people ? Most of them are stuck on Tik Tok. What awareness ???
Deeply saddened that SIR EDWARD GRIFFIN has been surrounded with the imbeciles of ignorance, so much so that they have energized him towards such improprieties as shilling a localized conference in the era of the Internet. Hopeful that his message gets out amidst his cabal of unwitting detractors, but perhaps shouting into the void with my criticism.
I can only find 3 of his books in ebook form, and i live in the part of the world where his physical book will definitely not cross customs check. 😂 Can anyone tell edward griffin please sell books on a website or sth?😂
czcams.com/video/EwydoBQwnc4/video.html
You have unknowingly been in a secret war against the working class, although it is undeclared on your side, everything has been brought to bear against you. Money is a rich man's tool. His weapon, his control mechanism, it's the vary chains that bind you opress you and Thay made you want it.
It's actually time for the black pill
No, it's merely the dark before the dawn. Decentralized free communication means the media's stranglehold on speech (which allows these poison ideologies to infect society) is coming to an end.
Lowest common denominator
Ďooo9
Once you know water is always level and the earth is flat and still with a dome, you can’t go back to living on a spinning wet ball rocket.
Communist bookstore! 🤣🤣🤣 oh, the evangelism!
So he’s saying that it’s ok to be a damn commie! I can’t agree with that. If he said we should become good Buddhists, I could buy into that fairly easy, or look for the good in people...
I think he says the opposite?
It's NOT capitalism that is not the issues or problem, it's corpoRATism. G. Edward Griffin now sounds like a controlled opposition sellout
Not exactly....
@Meekseek, your comment reminds me of how some people first believe in their own opinion as an absolute and given fact, and base their opinion about those of others according to their fixed assumptions. You're starting at the wrong end!
No. It’s capitalism. Corporations arise from capitalism. And cartels arise from corporations. And the state is indispensable to capitalism. If you don’t like rule by corporations, then you have to abolish capitalism. Capitalism is the basic problem.
@@devonseamoor and you believe in your fixed assumptions... a mom and pop business and shop can be capitalist venture, they have a product people want, a fair deal, they're not a corporation. What's a better system, a monarchy, ok, that is exactly who rules, Kings & vassals, and you are part of the serfs, like me, and the triple crown. rules and owns everything. You're all clueless but think you know it all.
@@syourke3 a bit late to the party, marxist. Bankers the gold changers are not a corporation they are criminals who have been allowed to run the world, thanks to whom? If you don't know that answer you don't know much.
*He's a poor interviewer. He peppers his diatribes with "you know" & "ah."*
Most people are poor interviewers.
Even Joe Toegan sucks at it.
He's not a professional interviewer, they know each other already and are used to informal talk. I suppose they just continue where they left off the last time. Right?