Mathematical Logic, Lecture 1 (First-order logic: languages, structures and formulas)

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 26. 09. 2021
  • These are video lectures for the Mathematical Logic course (Math 220A) taught by Artem Chernikov at UCLA in the Fall quarter of 2021.

Komentáře • 14

  • @archernikov
    @archernikov  Před 2 lety +8

    In the first part of the course we will be following Chapters 2 and 3 of "A First Journey Through Logic" by Martin Hils and François Loeser:
    bookstore.ams.org/stml-89
    Followed by further material in model theory from David Marker's "Model Theory : An Introduction"
    www.springer.com/gp/book/9780387987606
    and my notes.

    • @Spacexioms
      @Spacexioms Před 2 lety +1

      Thank you for the resources and great lectures. Your instruction is wholesome!

  • @abstractnonsense3253
    @abstractnonsense3253 Před 10 měsíci +3

    This is great. I've been looking for a high quality mathematical logic playlist on youtube and this seems to be it. Thank you Prof Chernikov.

    • @archernikov
      @archernikov  Před 10 měsíci +2

      Glad to hear that it's helpful!

  • @llinuxer
    @llinuxer Před 2 lety +13

    Dear Prof Chernikov, thank you so very much for making your material available. This is VERY HELPFUL to independent learners and VERY MUCH APPRECIATED!!! Is it possible to have access to notes and hw?

  • @shadazmi5402
    @shadazmi5402 Před 2 lety

    These are awesome! are there some psets or referred textbook to accompany these lectures? I have been searching for a proper course on logic.

  • @Spacexioms
    @Spacexioms Před 2 lety

    Is there any notes that are publicly available?

  • @GodlessPhilosopher
    @GodlessPhilosopher Před měsícem

    Is this Anton Petrov speaking?

  • @punditgi
    @punditgi Před 2 lety +3

    c#acibo!

  • @peterd5843
    @peterd5843 Před 2 lety

    23:00

  • @user-sr8vk9sx4n
    @user-sr8vk9sx4n Před rokem +1

    should logic symbols also include "for all" and "or"

    • @archernikov
      @archernikov  Před rokem +6

      We don't need to include those because they can be expressed using the existential quantifier, negation and conjunction - so we have chosen a minimal set of logical symbols that allows to express all the other ones, in order to keep the syntax as simple as possible.

  • @nunoricardoserafim3187
    @nunoricardoserafim3187 Před 9 měsíci

    Is the set of variables countable? If so, why?

    • @stefanoge884
      @stefanoge884 Před 3 měsíci

      It is. You can prove it by constructing the bijection f from N to the set of variables, defined as f(n) = v_n (greek letter ni pedex n).
      Why did logicians decide that it is so? This I don't know yet. Probably because if we had infinite variables it would be impossible to write down most of them, and would be useless. Take for example the real numbers. We have access only to a small minority of them, the computable numbers. For the others we need an infinite string only to decribe one of them. The same would be for a set of variables with a cardinality more than countable. You'd need an infinite string to identify a generic variable, or an infinite amount of symbols (which is impossible to list and to describe).