I didn't get the last proof. How is it proven that such section exsists? [edit: nvm, he talks about it in 5 minutes, I just leave it for others, maybe someone will have the same impression that they missed the point]
Yeah, his formulation is a bit sloppy. The original stated that the barber shaved *precisely* those men, who didn't shave themselves. The precisely in this context is supposed to stand for "if and only if"
I studied from Shai this course in Technion, it was one of the best math courses, I learned
грубый, вопрос, но надеюсь не обидишься, ты связал свою жизнь с вычислениями, искусственным интеллектом?
@@Noname-vu5xl lol another lunatic 😄
This is great! Thanks!!!
Lecture begins at 10.00
The camera moves around way too much. Can you zoom out so that you can see the whole board?
Berry's paradox is better done with integers or whole numbers otherwise there may not be a smallest element not in B.
28:10 he says it must be integers
10:00
I didn't get the last proof. How is it proven that such section exsists? [edit: nvm, he talks about it in 5 minutes, I just leave it for others, maybe someone will have the same impression that they missed the point]
what was the joke everyone laughed at?
Your mom.
The barber paradox needs that the barber shaves ONLY those men who do…. Otherwise there is no paradox
Yeah, his formulation is a bit sloppy. The original stated that the barber shaved *precisely* those men, who didn't shave themselves. The precisely in this context is supposed to stand for "if and only if"
Great lecture, terrible camera shot