Drummer reacts to "One After 909" by The Beatles (Two Versions!)
Vložit
- čas přidán 1. 07. 2024
- So the video I had called this "One After" but when I looked it up it was called "One After 909"... so my apologies if I don't say the full name in the very beginning lol thank you to our patron Laura A for this great beatles request. I honestly really liked different things in both versions... such as ringo's drumming in BOTH good god he had his wheaties for these takes. The second one is a remaster of the rooftop concert take and wow.... it's so different yet still the same. So strange lol.
Link to original content (Please support the artist! I'm just giving my opinion, go get the real deal.)
If you’d like to donate to the channel or just show your appreciation, all the details are below. I created this channel for my daughter, so she has videos of her father talking and doing something he enjoys(listening to music and talking about it) since I don’t have any of those of my father. :) thank you again for your generosity guys, I appreciate you all more then you will ever know.
▶️ PAYPAL◀️
www.paypal.me/L33REACTS
@L33Reacts
🔴PATREON🔴
www.patreon.com/L33Reacts
$ Cash App $
$LeeMann3011
🔶️CONTACT ME 🔶️
L33REACTSYT@GMAIL.COM
IF YOU ARE IN A BAND ARE INTERESTED IN BEING FEATURED ON THE CHANNEL, PLEASE SEND YOUR BEST SINGLE AND A PICTURE OF YOUR LOGO TO L33ReactsYT@gmail.com
All rights to this song belong to whoever they belong to, this is just a video containing commentary on the song and falls under fair use
⚠️ COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMERS
► Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states: “Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.”
#thebeatles #thebeatlesreaction - Hudba
Lennon wrote this at age 16 back in the 50's. It was re-worked and released on "Let it Be" in 1970, their final album, Lee.
Beatles! Looking forward to the rooftop concert!
Gotta do “Don’t let me down” from the rooftop! (Killer John vocal)
You have to SEE the rooftop concert.
So mind boggling. Like two different bands and there's only 6 years apart. My favourite 'live' performance by The Beatles (Rooftop). George's solo smokes.
Often George get dissed for not being as good as "fill in the blank" yet those who came after him were influenced by him. He was an all around guitarist from the solo in Til There was You and And I Love Her, to his Grammy award winning slide guitar solo on his last album Brainwashed...The instrumental "Marwa Blues" went on to receive the 2004 Grammy Award for Best Pop Instrumental Performance. Yes here he smokes, and later had this superb slide guitar playing that none of his contemporaries bothered with much. Ha shas received 6 Grammys during his solo career.
The first one was recorded in 1962. One of the earliest songs John and Paul wrote. The second one is from the Let It Be sessions in 1969. They decided to go back to a few of their early songs to complete the album.
John said he wrote it when he was 17. Paul may have helped him finish it, but it was John's song.
Straight down-the-line Chuck Berry inspired rock n roll was the Beatles' comfort food, a secure place on earth to return to after all the adventures at the dizzying heights of popular music.
Please watch the rooftop concert
Re: Ringo...when working with Jeff Lynn who was producing, Lynn kept insisting Ringo use a click trak in his headphones. Finally Ringo had enough of that and told him something like , F**k your click track, I AM the click trak" and had been for years on countless Beatles records and beyond.
Similar thing happened with U2 with the same outcome lol! Someone insisted that Larry Mullen Jr. use a metronome. He replied 'I am the metronome' Both Ringo and Larry were correct. :D
The first song Lennon and McCartney wrote together! And the rest, is history!
John has said that he wrote it himself when he was 17, so I don't know if Paul helped or not, although sounds like not.
John wrote this on his own
I never knew nor heard that first version! Very cool
I def like the naked version better. A little freeer later Beatles feel.
Some old time rock and roll in both versions. Like it.
This is a song that John wrote and the Beatles performed it many times in Hamburg, Germany, before they became famous. For their LAST album, John dusted it off, and they had fun reimagining for their swan song.
Let It Be wasn't their final album
@@jyjjy7 It was their last released album. Abbey Road was recorded last, but released before LiB.
If you're looking for a challenge from the Beatles, try "You Know My Name (Look Up the Number)" in which they try to sound a bit like Vivian Stanshall and the Bonzo Dog Doo Dah Band.
He's reacted to that one!
I think I know what you're saying
Great to hear the two versions back to back
Another Beatles vid! Yay! And like others have said, you HAVE to watch the full rooftop concert. They are having a blast man!
Oh don’t worry once we get through these requests I have we are going straight to that concert lol
@@L33Reacts Woohoo! It's so good! And poignant, being the last time they played together and all. You'll love it mate😁
I love Billy Preston's piano playing on the Let it Be version!
They never did the phone book, but they did do "You Know My Name (Look Up the Number)"...
You can really hear the skiffle roots in this particular song, which I believe is from the earliest phase of writing their own material. It certainly sounds that way. Glad to hear the studio version for the first time.
(Okay, I should have waited until Lee finished before commenting)
John said he wrote it when he was 17. Paul could have helped him finish it, but it was John's song. They played it a lot in Hamburg. He wanted to write a song like some of the popular songs at the time about freight trains and such.
Great, thanks! Love John's voice, early and later.
the 2rd with Billy Preston on keyboard at get back . They play together in starclub in Hamburg in early days
You NEED to hear the "Live at the Beeb" recordings -- kick-assed band!
Direct from The Cavern and Hamburg. That backbeat
The first version didn't have keyboards. And that is a terrific version from when they were young.
John did love his riffs and chord changes!
the Fab Four!!!
What a great lively dance worthy song the naked version , the rooftop performance really rocks! Billy added so much to these sessions. I feel real happy, listening to that, and was kind of expecting to hear Danny boy
Great stuff , I love the Beatles reactions, cheers
Amazing
Rooftop? 'Dig A Pony', for the love of gawd!
😊🤙🏼🎶🔥❤️🍁❤️✨️🕊
1st version, they are being "directed" in the studio. For the 2nd version, they are relaxed, sitting back and playing this almost as a lark, in the middle of tons of ten second covers and pieces of old songs from the 50s, that they would spout off for fun.
IIn the frist version they are doing a lot of fooling around before getting to the final version.
@@lauraallen55 well, these guys are the experts at foolery for sure😂😂😂 must be why it’s so hard to get them to get shit done and yet so much eventually.
@@fineasfogg1461 So true lol! The short version where they're having issues is on YT from Anthology 1. It"s pretty hilarious actually. Paul and John keep blaming one another for messing up.
I believe Pete Best was on drums on the Anthology version.
I honestly see an improvement between the two versions
'One after 909'😊 Do 'Three Cool Cats' next.
You should try the heavy version of this song by Laibach. They sneak in the riff from Smoke On The Water at the end of the guitar solo.
The second is from the "Get Back" sessions.
Hey Lee, always cool to check out some Beatles. Another double shot that would be cool i While My Guitar Gently Weeps from the White Album & from Anthology 3 George does an acoustic version, jus him & his guitar.
Lee I was watching you Woodstock playlist & I didn't see Joe Cocker covering the Beatles With A Little Help From My Friends. If you haven't seen it, it's a must. Definitely one of the highlights of Woodstock. And if you've never seen Joe perform, it's a sight to see. He puts everything he's got into a song. Check it out.
I count Joe Cocker as at
the top live performance I’ve ever seen heard or felt.
Or the Anthology and original released version of 'Strawberry Fields'. Radically different. In fact there's many you could do comparisons on.....'Come Together'.....etc
Thanks Laura, enjoyed these both. Prefer the first just a bit more.❤
I prefer the 2nd version!
I like the first version best too!
Let It Be (album) was their last released album, (recorded in 68 released in 70) The Beatles were tired of their endless studio tricks and effects and wanted an album that represented them just playing as a band, no extensive overdubs, just a live band recording (as close as possible).
Billy Preston's keyboard playing gives the "Let it Be" version so much Lift & Brightness 🙂
Definitely check out - You Know My Name (Look Up The Number). Great stuff!! It was the B side of the Let It Be Single. ❤
He covered that one!
Beatles attempt at flashing back to their early days
Flashing all the way back to John's teenage days when he wrote it!
There are also other versions out there. 2 demo's from 1960. 2 rehearsals from 1962. And one from the Let It Be Super Deluxe set with Billy on piano.
I almost included one of the short rehearsals where they keep messing up and blaming each other. lol
👍
Roof Top with Billy Preston on Keyboard
Try a listen to Anthology 1 where they were trying to record this on a break in touring appearances and radio shows, but it kept breaking down. Then George Martin was able to piece parts of two attempts together to make a complete version (which was never released) so we can hear what it would have sounded like in 64 if they ever did a complete version. John wrote this years before the 64 attempts.
I believe it was '63, and yes, John wrote it when he was 17. :)
1st version is total Chuck Berry style. The Rolling Stones and the Annals to have any chance of making it big.als were doing a lot of R and B at the time like this, but the money was in the Beatles pop rock songs for the girls who screamed for them later. Make no mistake , the Beatles were a hard driven leather jacketed rock group in the dirty clubs and strip joints of Hamburg [and clubs of Liverpool] doing this kind of stuff all night long, 8 hours a night, before they changed their image on advice of their manager Brian Epstein if they wanted to make it big. They intentionally wrote the kinds of tunes that would sell, they were NOT just a "boy band" as so many know it all jerks call them for their early days in the national spotlight. they were tough and they paid their dues for years before fame.
Yes, they more than paid their dues, especially over in Hamburg. It's one of the reasons they were such a tight band, and seemed so well-rehearsed. They were well-rehearsed through sheer experience performing nights on the Reeperbahn in Hamburg's two different clubs. John wrote this song when he was 17, according to him. I also read that train songs were big at the time, so that's the reason for the topic of the song.
i think the second version is just a more mature version....
The Willie Nelson cover is a fun listen too.
whats in between these two performances? first was studio, 2nd was from roof top (live) what else is in between? EXPERIENCE. and lots of it, and CONFIDENCE
I think I'm right in saying, John was 15 when he wrote it.
I read somewhere that he said he was 17, so maybe around when he met Paul?
Your daughter might like "Dance Tonight" off of Memory Almost Full. It was a song he wrote trying to learn the mandolin in his kitchen with his daughter Beatrice dancing around in the kitchen. BTW the "Naked" album (from 2003) , Paul had organized is superior to the official Let It Be album. Paul had all that Phil Spector over production stripped off.
Hey..funny one version from 57' and the other 69'
That's a recording from the Hamburg days. Pete Best was the drummer. Good display of why he was replaced with Ringo.
Nope!
@@KenHunter-lt8wm 'Nope!' what? from the Hamburg days, or why Pete was replaced with Ringo?
@@lauraallen55 Nope everything 🙂 Not Pete Best on drums, not from Hamburg days. Just nope! 🙂
Recorded at Abbey Road in 1963 at the 'From Me To You' single session. Ringo on drums. Pete Best had been given the boot by then. As well as recording 'Thank You Girl', according to Lewisohn they wanted to do 'What Goes On' but didn't have time. How he knows that I'm not sure. Maybe heard them talking about it because he listened to the session tapes. He writes that John at the end of 'One After 909' asked George "what kind of solo was that?"
The 1969 version of One After 909 is a throwback to the original home tape recording version from '60 (with Stu Sutcliffe on bass), and reflects The Beatles' roots in skiffle music. Personally I prefer the Merseybeat arrangement from '63, but the song is great in any version. One of the earliest Lennon/McCartney songs, and they already had the goods when they wrote it.
John said that he wrote it when he was 17 so doesn't sound like Paul had anything to do with writing this one. I like the slower one a lot as well! The fast one has some nice elements, too, with the piano.
@@lauraallen55 Yes indeed, right on! In the Rolling Stone interview of 1970, John cited 'One After 909' as an example of a song he wrote separately from Paul even in the early days of the Beatles. He made a comment too during Get Back that they were doing the song so that he'd be [represented] on the album.
@@gettinhungrig2 That's right! :)
Guitar strings were heavier early on. Guitarist started using lighter banjo strings until manufacturers caught on.
One after 909 is the name!
The first Let It Be album version was produced by Phil Spector, the Let It Be... Naked album version, the project was supervised by Paul Mccartney, who did not like the production of the original album, as it did not faithfully represent what the group wanted at the time. .
No, Paul didn't like it, but although he initiated the remixing of the album, George Martin oversaw and produced it.
@@lauraallen55 John Lennon chose Phil Spector and was the producer of the album Let It Be. He removed in the final mix Do n't Let Me Down what deeply displeased Paul Mccartney was the mix of The Long And Winding Road..
@@SANPARR1 Yes, that deeply displeased Paul what was done to his own song. What deeply displeased me was what Spector did to John's song Across the Universe. That was vastly improved by George Martin!
@@lauraallen55 Correct - Now I understand you, I really like George Martin.
@@SANPARR1 What a massively talented producer he was! Yeah John didn't like the production either. Happy that Paul made such a fuss and it got redone as it's such an improvement on about three of the songs.
I'm not sure if the Naked version sounds the same, but my favorite version is the one from the original LET IT BE album. It sounds much richer.
I think the 'naked'' version is closer to the original on Let It Be.
Listening to the 2, I remember the naked one from when I first heard the song in the late 60s.
Billy Preston is killing that piano😊
The Long and Winding Road is one that you'd hear the difference between what the Beatles wanted and what Phil Spectre released.
Paul particularly didn't care for Phil Spector's treatment of his song
@@lauraallen55 and I agree with Paul. The naked version is so much better.
@@wrorchestra1 That isn't the onlly song that was vastly improved. John's Across the Universe was LOADS better after George Martin fixed it all.
@@wrorchestra1 John didn't like the original either, and wanted it changed.
@@lauraallen55 I do own the album so I'm well aware of what's changed. I just feel that the Long and Winding Road has the most significant change.
John and Paul wrote this one 1957
If you're looking for a fun Beatles song for Danica, look no further than the Yellow Submarine LP. All Together Now is another joyful song written by McCartney for the younger fans. I know my niece enjoyed it way back then - she's 48 yrs old now.
Paul wrote most of the song, but John wrote the middle part. :)
It's not really fun, it's a below averange children song
@se6369 I'm not claiming it's a masterpiece, but it does contain some entertainment value as far as I'm concerned. It's unreasonable to expect every one of their songs to be topshelf quality.
@lauraallen55 Definitely a Paul song without a doubt. There are two main things I enjoy about this song, one is when they gradually pick up the tempo towards the end of the song, and the other is listening to all four of them (plus a few misc extras) singing together. I find there is something particularly joyful, being that all of their vocals seem to blend perfectly to create a unique resonance. The best example of this is on Yellow Submarine.
@@tdgallagher218 I think they do great harmonizations on loads of their songs!
Yes, it is a 'Paul' song definitely without a doubt. However, John *did* write the middle part. It was common for them to contribute to one another's songs. Like John's masterpiece A Day in the Life had a middle part contributed by Paul.
Let it be Naked is VASTLY better than the original album. It also contains Don't Let Me Down which Phil Spector left off the original
Fly on the Wall and Maggie May were two other differences between them.
What Phil Spector did to Across the Universe alone ruined it.
The first failed attempt in 64 ended because Paul was messing up. John said, "What are you doing?" Paul replies, "I can't do it, its murder. I don't have a plectrum." "Where's your suitcase?" " I don't have it. " Roadie Mal butts in, "Paul. I ask if you wanted your suitcase." (I may have a few words wrong here but you can see how hectic their schedule was in 64 with several concerts a day, radio interviews and a few minutes granted for studio time plus travel time. They worked like dogs.) After he got his plectrum they tried again but it broke down and George Martin was able to piece the good parts together for Anthology
John was messing up playing the wrong time signature.
The 1st version was recorded in ‘63. The second in ‘69.
The first version they ever did was recorded in 1960 under the Quarrymen name!
Most of the "Anthology" series are out takes and alternative or partial pieces of songs.
The 2nd version was much faster
you've promised to do it but even I can't find a full rooftop video on CZcams...I have one in my own computer, hope you have better searching skills than me, or I can send you the video
You can send it to me L33ReactsYT@gmail.com if you don’t mind and I’ll use it! Thank you so much 😊
Wasn't the first John singing lead, and Paul mainly in the second?
Both are John mainly on lead.
@@grahamharley4895 if you watch the rooftop performance you will see that it’s John singing lead.
I prefer the Let It Be Naked versions of everything--didn't care much for the Spector production on that album.
I keep hearing that Spector was a mad scientist minus the scientist 😅😂
John and Paul were the Quarrymen
Paul wasn't an original member. He joined later. John formed the band, and it included his friends from school (the band was named after his school) Pete Shotton, Colin Hanton, Rod Davis, and Len Garry. This was in 1956, and Paul didn't join until July 1957.Then, George joined in early 1958. Stuart Sutcliffe, John's best friend ultimately joined the group (after the other original members left), and he and John came up with the name The Beatles. The Quarrymen even played at the Cavern (before Paul joined) for awhile!
@@lauraallen55weren’t they the Silver Beatles before Beatles?
@@sydnoids1 They were the Quarrymen, then Johnny and the Moon Dogs, then the Silver Beatles for a few months, then toured for a bit as Johnny Gentle's Backing Band, then The Beatles.
Almost 10 years between these versions....Let It Be Naked is so much better than the Specter-produced version, thanks to Paul and George Martin.
Mostly thanks to Sir George Martin - what a talent in production! None of the Beatles liked the rushed Spector version, but Paul was especially unhappy about his Long and Winding Road song. Luckily, all the excess noise got stripped away from John's Across the Universe too!
Except for the keyboard part, the arrangements were identical. Just separated by five years,
The naked one is a step or two faster than the first one but yeah for the most part they are identical. The piano was great in the second one
And actually the 1st is in straight 4 and the later version is a shuffle
@@edwardmeradith2419 Yes, different time, completely!
In Let it Be - Naked, 'naked' doesn't mean what you normally think of naked to mean in music. This was Let it Be with the Phil Spector gloss stripped off. I prefer Spector's version. Naked sounds boring and dull to me. The Long and Winding Road sounds a little syrupy but I'm not too into it anyway.
In my opinion this is a great candidate for the 2nd worst Beatles song ("Revolution #9" being the worst) 😅
Sorry Lee, but I must disagree with your assessment of the two versions of this song. To me, the difference between the two were akin to night and day. The original version (1963) was flat out missing soul. Paul's bass playing is an entry-level performance; George's guitar solo is rather lame and not very cohesive; John's effort is passable at best; and Ringo's playing is rather basic. And it must be noted: there is no piano accompaniment in that recording. The song lacked energy from start to end and it sounds as though they were ready for a nap. The 1969 version, in contrast, was a complete turn around. My toes automatically start tapping along whenever I hear the newer version due. Ofc, all four Beatles stepped up their effort with a tighter performance and obviously a quicker tempo. Billy Preston's keyboard contribution certainly elevates the song to a higher level. The earlier version was mundane, whereas this one sounded like they were having fun.
Not so much a disagreement as a difference of opinion. :) I like aspects of both versions. The fact that John wrote it when he was 17 is pretty cool too, regardless of what tempo they decided to play it in. The newer version is a throwback to the original they performed in the early days, even as Quarrymen and without Paul on some occasions, I believe.
Sadly, one of my least favorite Beatles tunes.
Even if it’s the worst, still it moves! Beatles have swag❤