The Human Genome Project: The 13-Year Quest to Chart the Mysteries of Human Genetics

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 30. 06. 2024
  • Check out Squarespace: squarespace.com/megaprojects for 10% off on your first purchase.
    Simon's Social Media:
    Twitter: / simonwhistler
    Instagram: / simonwhistler
    This video is #sponsored by Squarespace.
    Love content? Check out Simon's other CZcams Channels:
    SideProjects: / @sideprojects
    Biographics: / @biographics
    Geographics: / @geographicstravel
    Casual Criminalist: / @thecasualcriminalist
    Today I Found Out: / todayifoundout
    TopTenz: / toptenznet
    Highlight History: / @highlighthistory
    XPLRD: / @xplrd
    Business Blaze: / @brainblaze6526

Komentáře • 349

  • @megaprojects9649
    @megaprojects9649  Před 3 lety +13

    Check out Squarespace: squarespace.com/megaprojects for 10% off on your first purchase.

    • @KarsonNow
      @KarsonNow Před 3 lety +2

      02:50 I would bet they are smaller... I mean look at computer hardware this days - It would be a good video about the CPUs or GPUs becouse of 5 or 7 nm structure size of transistors...
      It's really crazy, i mean actual GPU from nivida have a size of 826 mm²... And 54 billions of transistors...
      AMD Ryzen CPU have almost 4,2 billions transistors at the size of 80,7 mm²...
      Check Moore Law:
      en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transistor_count

    • @thesilentone4024
      @thesilentone4024 Před 3 lety +2

      I can say I know dna 15% before after aa 17% I think lol how do we work omg lol. Well I got a question or a request um 1 is it ok to talk about NV water problems 2 can you do a video on vegas megaprojects that failed?

    • @dominichanna8904
      @dominichanna8904 Před 3 lety +1

      I'm pretty sure we have crispr because of the Geno project. That's a pretty big invention because China has made lab twins and made it so they can't get HIV

    • @itsonlycayle
      @itsonlycayle Před 3 lety +2

      Rosalind Franklin?

    • @pandorasbox4238
      @pandorasbox4238 Před 3 lety +1

      Wasn't Crick high on acid when he saw it suddenly?

  • @henriroggeman7267
    @henriroggeman7267 Před 3 lety +89

    I think it would have been worth mentioning that James Watson, Francis Crick, and Maurice Wilkins would have gotten nowhere without the groundbreaking work of Rosalind Franklin.

    • @tarunsinghshekhawat8692
      @tarunsinghshekhawat8692 Před rokem +4

      Yes ,X ray diffraction of Rosalind Franklin based on this only Watson and crik gave structure of ds DNA

  • @ericwright8592
    @ericwright8592 Před 3 lety +116

    Cell Biologist here. Electrophoresis based sequencing is called Sanger Sequencing. It is immensely laborious. It was all we had for decades. Automated sequencing using Illumina platforms is called Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and is broadly known as "sequencing by synthesis". They work completely differently and afaik there was no sequencing by synthesis (as it is in NGS) involved at all in the original sequencing of the human genome, as it didn't really come around in its current form until about 2011ish. Now we can sequence a whole human genome in a few hours. There was actually a pretty intense format war similar to VHS vs betamax when NGS first became viable. There were 3-4 competing companies each with their own standard and proprietary technology. Solexa, Roche 454, Illumina, and maybe others. Illumina won out and is now the standard for sequencing

    • @thetruthwillout9094
      @thetruthwillout9094 Před 3 lety +10

      Well done. The award for "I'm the cleverest person in the comments section" goes to you my friend! 👏👏👏 🥱🥱🥱

    • @ericwright8592
      @ericwright8592 Před 3 lety +26

      @@thetruthwillout9094 Just trying to make it clear that the two sequencing methods described in the video are totally different and were used decades apart and that NGS played no role in the original human genome project.

    • @Justwantahover
      @Justwantahover Před 3 lety +7

      Can you please troll "Bible Research Tools" and tell him that genetics is based on evolution, not creationism. Creationists are led to believe genetics is based on creationism. But it's so easy to debunk cos I ask them, is genetics based on what's in the textbooks or what's only in creationist sites?. They come back with an encyclopedia full of pseudo genetics instead of answering my simple question. I ask the question again and yet more pseudoscience (in an unprecedented quantity) and they never answer my question. And they cleverly word it like they are in the "right" when they are in fact stumped. Clever persuasive creationist wording but no real science, just made up shit.

    • @Phlya1
      @Phlya1 Před 3 lety +6

      A couple mistakes: Sanger sequencing is also sequencing by synthesis. Illumina is a very similar technology, just on steroids (and with some huge advancements in the chemistry and detection, of course). Also, Illumina sequencing is the same as Solexa, since Illumina bought Solexa and uses their technology.

    • @notmaireelneim
      @notmaireelneim Před 3 lety +1

      They have biologists in prison?

  • @MissSimsalot
    @MissSimsalot Před 3 lety +90

    Always only Crick and Watson get mentioned.
    Rosalind Franklin: am I a joke to you?

  • @ignitionfrn2223
    @ignitionfrn2223 Před 3 lety +34

    1:45 - Chapter 1 - The human genome
    3:55 - Chapter 2 - Early discoveries
    4:50 - Mid roll ads
    6:20 - Chapter 3 - Sequencing DNA
    8:05 - Chapter 4 - The human genome project
    12:00 - Chapter 5 - The finishing phase
    13:15 - Chapter 6 - Completion
    14:05 - Chapter 7 - Findings
    15:50 - Chapter 8 - The future

  • @stevenewland8000
    @stevenewland8000 Před 3 lety +26

    I started my PhD at the Sanger center a year before it was completed and can still remember the party when it was published. A Few Nobel prize winners were present. Roslin Franklin was rembered by renaming the mrc section to the Roslin Franklin Center for Genomic Research

  • @amandajones8841
    @amandajones8841 Před 3 lety +231

    The only thing Watson and Crick discovered was Rosalind Franklin's notes

    • @jamesdreads7828
      @jamesdreads7828 Před 3 lety +22

      massively under rated comment

    • @anshagrawal6289
      @anshagrawal6289 Před 3 lety +6

      They used the Xray diffraction data produced by Franklin and the other guy

    • @penguinista
      @penguinista Před 3 lety +9

      It was unacceptable how she was treated, but if that was true she would have had the structure herself.

    • @dianehansen5552
      @dianehansen5552 Před 3 lety +9

      Yes, her unpublished notes stated DNA was a helix, as many already suspected. She was not a chemist, she couldn't have taken the leap necessary to defining how DNA worked.

    • @Football__Junkie
      @Football__Junkie Před 3 lety +6

      Shots fired

  • @penguinista
    @penguinista Před 3 lety +23

    The Human Genome Project has already paid for itself in technological development that has sprung from it. It is easy to take for granted the advantages that come from having the whole genome and the technologies that were developed in order to complete it. We determined the genome of COVID-19 immediately, track it as it mutates, and develop RNA vaccines to the specific antigens we decide are important from protein modeling. All those things depend on technology that would certainly not be at the stage it is now without the Project.

    • @MountainFisher
      @MountainFisher Před 3 lety +3

      With the Infomatics software of the ENCODE Project which was actually bigger than the Genome project. It involved thousands of scientists around the world using the Genome as a map. One thing they discovered is that there is essentially no Junk DNA, it all has functions.

  • @JohnSmith77777
    @JohnSmith77777 Před 3 lety +19

    I did my bit, I was worked on the mapping and sequencing of Chromosomes 9 & 10 at the Sanger centre/Sanger Institute for 4 years. I am proud we beat the commercial version run by Craig Venter & Celera who tried to patent every gene sequence discovered as they went along, then charge researchers a royalty fee on to work on a specific gene. The public projected updated & published our data every 24hrs for free, negating Venter's/Celera's ability to patent gene sequences..... In the end the Venter could not put his shotgun sequences together without using the mapping data we created at the Sanger & the public project, both projects published in the same data, the Public project in nature with both the mapping and the sequencing data, Venter & Celera in Science and having to give an acknowledgement that their shotgun approach cold not be assembled with out the help of the public projects mapping data (which was like a scaffold to hang the shotgun sequences on)...... the public finished sequence was acknowledged to be more accurate 7 with less errors that Vente'rs........... finally o be fair to Venter, the computer processing power was about 7-10 years behind was was needed for a whole shotgun approach. ...... These days , with so many DNA sequences complete, Shotgun, matching up & identifying nucleotide changes using processing power means a individual's DNA sequence can be processed in a couple of hours,.... I still love Gap4 and miss contig assembly.

  • @CJOwen
    @CJOwen Před 3 lety +77

    If you took all the blood vessels out of a person and laid them end to end... that person would die.

    • @HarryNicNicholas
      @HarryNicNicholas Před 3 lety +4

      if you took every child who fell asleep in class at school and laid them end-to-end in the playing field, they'd be a whole lot more comfortable.

  • @wiltchamberlain9920
    @wiltchamberlain9920 Před 3 lety +37

    I remember when they announced that they were going to work on it. It was like, “maybe someday they will be able to do this kind of thing. Don’t hold your breath.”
    And then, yeah, it was over a decade later that they finished, it still seemed like, “oh! They finished that already? Damn. That was quick.” It seemed like something that wouldn’t happen in my life when they started.

    • @helmsscotta
      @helmsscotta Před 3 lety +4

      It got exponentially faster and cheaper as it went along.

  • @Southsaudi
    @Southsaudi Před 3 lety +51

    You should do a video on the A-10 Warthog

  • @BytebroUK
    @BytebroUK Před 3 lety +111

    I cannot believe you mentioned "Crick & Watson" and completely missed out "Rosalind Franklin". You lose two house-points.

    • @EnraEnerato
      @EnraEnerato Před 3 lety +9

      My thoughts exactly, I was highly disapointed.

    • @Hollylivengood
      @Hollylivengood Před 3 lety +4

      Thank you.

    • @michaelaldam
      @michaelaldam Před 3 lety +4

      I was about to write the exact same thing!!!

    • @dianehansen5552
      @dianehansen5552 Před 3 lety +1

      AND not forget Otto's role in helping many to fly by inventing the petrol engine.

    • @EnraEnerato
      @EnraEnerato Před 3 lety +1

      @@dianehansen5552 Isn't it called "Otto engine" and "Otto cycle" for a reason?

  • @meson183
    @meson183 Před 3 lety +8

    In 1987 the BBC produced a wonderful historical dramatisation of Watson and Crick's discovery of DNA. It was called _Life Story_ (though it may also be known as _The Race for the Double Helix_ in other parts of the World). It stars Jeff Goldblum and Tim Pigott-Smith. It also shows how Rosalind Franklin was passed over for her part in the discovery.

  • @whoshotdk
    @whoshotdk Před 3 lety +20

    Future alien xenoarcheologist: It's such a shame we don't have any DNA examples of this extinct hewmon species. At least we've got these tasty bananas though.

  • @kathis4074
    @kathis4074 Před 3 lety +11

    "If you were to type 8 hours a day, at 60 words per minute, it would take around 50 years for you to type the whole human genom."
    Well, still faster than the time G.R.R. Martin takes to finish "Game of Thrones"...

    • @stmounts
      @stmounts Před 3 lety +1

      If you were able to watch 6 CZcams videos an hour for 8 hours a day, it would take more than 50 years to see all of Simon Whistler's channels........

  • @michaelbrown5219
    @michaelbrown5219 Před 3 lety +3

    You missed out on the most important part. CRISPER is what’s making this map so important. It’s what gives us an ability to modify what we have mapped. You really should do a follow-up explaining how it works and the breakthroughs it’s already had.

  • @ianstradian
    @ianstradian Před 3 lety +3

    Here is a scary thought:
    We developed the nuclear bomb and there were only three countries who had the power and expertise to do so.
    Two of those countries failed to complete this task.
    In 1972 the microchip was developed by only a handful of corporations.
    In 1998 the human genome project had only the best scientists in that field working on it.
    Today there are over 4000 corporate labs screwing around with the human dna code.

  • @nadimali101
    @nadimali101 Před 3 lety +18

    Could we have an episode on the AC130 Gunship? The most iconic aerial gunship that ever has existed with its 105mm cannon

    • @calska140
      @calska140 Před 3 lety +3

      It's development is kinda underwhelming. Its the same as the development for it's Vietnam forefather the AC47 and that is; get light cargo plane, jam some gnarly ship mounted anti air guns through the sides.
      Then when youve done that use it by having the pilot cut banked circles while the gunners defoliate the ground below.

    • @nadimali101
      @nadimali101 Před 3 lety +1

      @@calska140 Good to note on

  • @robertguy9553
    @robertguy9553 Před 3 lety +7

    Finally! Been mentioning this since the start of the channel. Thank you for doing this one

    • @SecurityMonitorLizard
      @SecurityMonitorLizard Před 3 lety

      I knew I saw your suggestion before. Great idea, dude. Thank you.
      P.S. my late doggos name was Guy.

    • @matthewdopler8997
      @matthewdopler8997 Před 3 lety

      I also suggested it once. It is a pretty amazing feat.

  • @matth8924
    @matth8924 Před 3 lety +12

    I remember hearing about this when I was a kid in 3rd grade in 2003, so goddamn cool

  • @alyssa6876
    @alyssa6876 Před 3 lety +4

    I remember all the hype when The Human Genome Project was first announced when I was a kid. There were supposed to be amazing advancements in medicine, cures for cancers, no more disease! (Typical media hype.) What came out of it was an amazing deep look and better understanding of what makes us tick and why. I was fortunate enough to see the kick off of it as a child and study the results at University as a non-traditional student (ie an adult with a family).

  • @TheDesertraptor
    @TheDesertraptor Před 3 lety +2

    My PC was part of this parallel computing project. They said we'd cure all the world's ills once we mapped the human gnome.
    Still waiting on immortality. But I guess only the mega rich will get that special treatment

  • @neilzukov2921
    @neilzukov2921 Před 3 lety +5

    Mega Project idea: The "Mining and Chemical Combine" in Zheleznogorsk, Russia. A Plutonium production plant. The entire facility was built 200 meters into the mountain, and contains 3 Nuclear Reactors (Basically the same design as РБМК, like in Chernobyl),1 АД and 2 АДЭ (АДЭ-2 provided power and heating to the workers city, Zheleznogorsk). The facility has its own railway and electric locomotive.
    Now the Plutonium production is stopped (since 95'), and the reactors were shut down. Now they produce MOX fuel for fast liquid metal Reactors (for now, БН-800).

  • @vonirkinshtine
    @vonirkinshtine Před 3 lety +2

    I know this isn't one of your more popular videos. But, thank you for making it! Very fascinating!

  • @TheNinjaDC
    @TheNinjaDC Před 3 lety +4

    "There were gaps in the DNA that needed to still be filled..."
    Frogs🐸: "My time is now!"

  • @clemstevenson
    @clemstevenson Před 3 lety +8

    42. All that we have to do now is find out what the question actually was.

    • @archlich4489
      @archlich4489 Před 3 lety

      "Think Deep"

    • @clemstevenson
      @clemstevenson Před 3 lety +1

      @@archlich4489 Deep thought took 7.5 million years to compute the ultimate answer, so human DNA should be mere pocket calculator stuff.

  • @JP-xg6ij
    @JP-xg6ij Před 3 lety +2

    "One of the greatest acts of acts of human exploration took 13 years to complete." Opening up a lifetime of possibility and research on topics we are yet to comprehend. Long live DNA.

  • @matthewdopler8997
    @matthewdopler8997 Před 3 lety +1

    So happy to see this. I have been hoping and recommending this a while ago. It really is a impressive accomplishment.

  • @deemariedubois4916
    @deemariedubois4916 Před 3 lety +3

    Truthfully I will admit I don’t totally understand this but each time I do another study on it, I grasp a bit more. My interest is finding genetic mutations especially when dealing with cancer. Cancer doesn’t run in my mom’s side of the family but she developed such a rare cancer, no cure available, that her oncologist had only seen it one other time. Also it is still not known if it is cause environmentally or by a genetic mutation.
    I feel it was caused by a genetic mutation because if caused by exposure to cancer causing materials-like people exposed to breathing in asbestos dust-surely it wouldn’t be so rare. Mom never smoked, indulged in a screwdriver or a glass of champagne on very rare occasions. She was always fit, never overweight. She had 2 brothers and 7 sisters, none of whom have had any form of cancer. Mom has passed away now due to pneumonia which was actually a kindness because the end her cancer would have brought about would have been horrendous.

  • @playlistsirois
    @playlistsirois Před 3 lety +1

    This one is my favorite so far! Really good

  • @nubletten
    @nubletten Před rokem

    Directly to the topic and not so much bs like on other channel videos, i love it.

  • @id104335409
    @id104335409 Před 3 lety +19

    I was hoping you will get into what interesting things scientists found after the mapping. Not just the banana thing.

  • @613aristocrat
    @613aristocrat Před 3 lety +2

    It already has changed life for many people. For example, it's common around where I live for couples to get tested for genetic incompatibility, meaning how likely it is for them to pass on genetic diseases if they got together.

  • @Justwantahover
    @Justwantahover Před 3 lety +4

    The last nail in the coffin for creationism!

    • @timan2039
      @timan2039 Před 3 lety +2

      Never underestimate just how willfully ignorant some are willing to be.

    • @mauriceupton1474
      @mauriceupton1474 Před 4 měsíci

      Quite the opposite.
      If it takes computers.

  • @valinorean
    @valinorean Před 3 lety +1

    Great video! One thing that would have made an interesting addition would have been more of a focus on the "battle" between the Human Genome Project and Craig Venter (which was briefly touched on), and the fact that the completion of the human genome would not have been possible had the two sides not called a truce near the end of the project to complete it.
    Also, Craig Venter's mission to sequence the ocean would make an excellent Megaproject!

  • @johnbaker8095
    @johnbaker8095 Před 3 lety +1

    Simon, not related to Genome project but I wanted to suggest a Megaproject. World's littlest skyscraper, the story behind it is very intresting and a good reason to check the drawing scale! Thanks for all the great Videos you do.

  • @Beryllahawk
    @Beryllahawk Před 3 lety +3

    I remember when the project was just getting started, and people were screaming about designer babies and genetically "tinkering" with everything about humans.
    Gene therapy wasn't even a term yet.
    And yeah, there was a lot of speculative media going apeshit. But, sad to say, the science fiction lovers among us were also losing their collective minds... and a lot of what they talked about was extremely vivid and tended to stick in the minds of readers, fans, etc.

  • @onepiecepedia
    @onepiecepedia Před 3 lety +2

    Perhaps the *most important megaproject* in human history!!

    • @Justwantahover
      @Justwantahover Před 3 lety

      The last nail in the coffin for creationists.

    • @Lowmanification
      @Lowmanification Před 3 lety

      @@Justwantahover Dude, stop. If you want to pick fights with fundies go right ahead. We don't need to hear about it.

  • @1TakoyakiStore
    @1TakoyakiStore Před 3 lety +1

    What blows my mind are the handful of DNA evidence in murder cases during the late 1980's and early 1990's prior to the human genome project finishing. It's like knowing that you could make a video game prior to the Apple computer. Possible but still farsighted.

  • @jonathantrot
    @jonathantrot Před rokem

    as always well explained !

  • @philippa5004
    @philippa5004 Před 2 lety +1

    Thanks for posting

  • @brett4264
    @brett4264 Před 3 lety +2

    That long sequence of the same "letter", mentioned by Simon, is actually where aliens deleted some super power humans once had.

    • @TheOmegaXicor
      @TheOmegaXicor Před 3 lety +5

      why does it always have to be aliens, god, governments, etc with you people. Why can't it be time travellers, huh??? :p

  • @Markle2k
    @Markle2k Před 3 lety +1

    "Some outside the scientific community labelled it as a waste of time and money because they couldn't see the immediate benefit" --The story of basic research.
    And no. Considering how we are communicating here, it isn't easy to see their "reasoning".

  • @lizdyson3627
    @lizdyson3627 Před 11 měsíci

    Great episode

  • @musamba101
    @musamba101 Před 3 lety +1

    Thanks to that project, I have been able to trace my paternal ancestry to Brittany and my maternal ancestry to the Canaries. I started my genetic research in 2008. Genealogy alone never would have sufficed!

  • @SMunro
    @SMunro Před 3 lety +1

    Now when you say if we could stretch human DNA we could circle the solar system, does DNA have the tensile strength to build a Dyson sphere from it? We could put humans in solar orbit and use their DNA to build the Dyson Sphere.

  • @kyleocall
    @kyleocall Před 3 lety +1

    Idea: A Megaproject video on how to make a Megaproject video

  • @Spinikar
    @Spinikar Před 3 lety +3

    Disease can becuased by a single gene reminds me how one missing semicolon my whole app breaks.....

  • @dawn-from-the-lab
    @dawn-from-the-lab Před 3 lety +1

    Simon, you owe us a Rosalind Franklin Biographic now.

  • @One_High_Guy_420
    @One_High_Guy_420 Před 3 lety

    You used the phrase "Banana for scale" without saying it outright! I'm dieing!!!

  • @jeffreypeters8446
    @jeffreypeters8446 Před 3 lety +1

    Simon, can you do a deep dive into the cloning and sequencing of DNA? I know you said we would all fall asleep but some of us would be very interested in this!
    Or how about a video on how the Humane Genome Project now helps with creating vaccines (ie: COVID-19 vaccine)?

  • @albertjackinson
    @albertjackinson Před 3 lety +1

    The beginning of the video reminded me of an idea:
    What if that level of accomplishment is something we have as a species of we tackle climate change? I wonder what the history books will say about it...

    • @highpath4776
      @highpath4776 Před 3 lety

      See Technology Connections on heat pumps, wont be the entire climate change game changer, but offers opportunites.

  • @brett4264
    @brett4264 Před 3 lety

    Thanks. That was interesting.

  • @adamreddaway2005
    @adamreddaway2005 Před 3 lety +1

    I imagine the scientist getting up in the middle of the pub and shouting, "I have discovered the secret of life!" Then a nearby patron turns to the bartender and mutters, "I guess I'll try what he's having."

  • @cassieoz1702
    @cassieoz1702 Před 3 lety +1

    The genome is less a blueprint or set of instructions, and more just a list of ingredients.

  • @robmerrell1745
    @robmerrell1745 Před 3 lety

    The company I work for did the IT support for Celera. They bought a new huge building, hired a ton of people, and then died pretty much overnight.

  • @MrSpartanicus
    @MrSpartanicus Před 3 lety +4

    Surprised you didn’t mention CRISPR, or did I miss it?

    • @UFGgamings
      @UFGgamings Před 3 lety +1

      He didnt mention it but that's kinda reasonable because CRISPR did not result from this project.

    • @MrSpartanicus
      @MrSpartanicus Před 3 lety

      @@UFGgamings but he did touch on the future of human genetics and breakthroughs... in that regard, CRISPR is huge. Either way, Simon, do a video on CRISPR!

  • @Mrgunsngear
    @Mrgunsngear Před 3 lety +1

    Thanks

  • @billpilling5725
    @billpilling5725 Před 3 lety +3

    The finishing phase. Thats when we built Lelu.

    • @helmsscotta
      @helmsscotta Před 3 lety

      We're still centuries away from Lelu.

  • @TheEvilCommenter
    @TheEvilCommenter Před 3 lety +3

    Good video 👍

  • @twocvbloke
    @twocvbloke Před 3 lety +2

    They can map it all they like, I'd still get utterly lost... :P

  • @HeavenlyMandate
    @HeavenlyMandate Před 3 lety +4

    *"Thanks to father's DNA, they were able to identify 16 of soldier genes."*
    Only true gamer knows the reference

  • @ZieMuffinMan
    @ZieMuffinMan Před 3 lety

    hey me again, may not be right for this channel, but maybe side projects or geographics could cover the Appalachian Trail? Learn you some more of 'Murica!

  • @kamalnathkanthimathinathan1473

    Crisper technology will make big impacts. And yaa, it's take many many years to do so...

  • @Ccs4646
    @Ccs4646 Před 3 lety

    Simon will you do a video on the Iowa Class battleships?

  • @davidedward10
    @davidedward10 Před 3 lety +2

    Well, at least I know what to say next time someone tells me I’ve gone bananas 🤪

  • @BlueBirdsProductions
    @BlueBirdsProductions Před 3 lety +1

    Well there you go guy who comments this on every single video you finally got what you wanted

  • @ImDatComo02
    @ImDatComo02 Před 3 lety +1

    Wow, just to say my dad was a part of this is mind blowing. He was a scientist in Los Alamos, now he's one of the best physicians in the United States, but this just makes me so proud to be able to have a personal connection to a grand topic analyzed on one of my favorite CZcams channels. Wow🙌🏽🤯🔥🔥🔥🔥

  • @stoneman6399
    @stoneman6399 Před 3 lety +1

    8:10 where do I find amazing backgrounds like these

  • @carrizzle9586
    @carrizzle9586 Před rokem

    I didn't know that the Human gnome project was sponsored by Squarespace???
    That just shows how important this topic is to this guy. The discovery of the Dollar-Helix is the key to life and that's how this guy is going to live forever. Smh

  • @Dickie72002
    @Dickie72002 Před 3 lety

    Used to go to The Eagle pub all the time.

  • @Kelly-jm8jx
    @Kelly-jm8jx Před 3 lety

    Like it. Thank you.

  • @TheOne-xu5oy
    @TheOne-xu5oy Před 2 lety

    I understand the basics of genetics and that changes in the environment and other factors lead to mutations in DNA to adapt to the environment. Hopefully I did explain that correctly. But here is what I don’t understand: what mechanism is actually at play that causes mutations in genetic to bring about better adaptation? How does DNA know what changes need to be made in order to bring about the right adaptation to survive the environment? How did it know that this form, human or any other form for that matter, was the right form to create?

  • @reefpi3567
    @reefpi3567 Před 3 lety

    yess :-) finally. thank you.

  • @peter-radiantpipes2800

    Great vid

  • @highpath4776
    @highpath4776 Před 3 lety +1

    If you could replace one gene with a better gene that would improve a human, What would it be?

  • @jacksavage4098
    @jacksavage4098 Před 3 lety +1

    Would be wonderful if we could use this to fight and possibly eliminate genetic diseases passed along from one generation to another.

    • @highpath4776
      @highpath4776 Před 3 lety +1

      Some would think that having a defect makes them more human, and that it would be wrong to remove it or outbreed it naturally or artificially. Indeed it could be that variation enables better survival in a changing world.

  • @padawanmage71
    @padawanmage71 Před 3 lety

    Oddly enough, Watson and Crick wouldn't have gotten anywhere with their DNA model, hadn't it been for the work of Dr. Rosalind Franklin. The famous Photo 51, that she took, was what Watson and Crick took and made their model. At least more recently, Dr. Franklin's contributions are becoming more and more accepted in scientific history texts, even going to so far as calling the model the 'Watson-Crick-Franklin' model.
    Seriously, how about a video on HER like and contributions?

  • @purplemoonshoes
    @purplemoonshoes Před 3 lety +11

    Rosalind Franklin also played a massive role in discovering DNA and didn't get credit at the time primarily due to sexism.

    • @thelastremainingmoderate1997
      @thelastremainingmoderate1997 Před 3 lety +1

      And missed out on the Nobel because she had died. The rules says the prizes can only go to living people. Talk about bad luck.

    • @LeaveMeAlone385
      @LeaveMeAlone385 Před 3 měsíci

      That sucks honestly. Yet another reason why we need feminism.

  • @Qfungi
    @Qfungi Před 3 lety

    best video so far

  • @TealCheetah
    @TealCheetah Před 3 lety

    some of that stock footage made me lol

  • @DrewberTravels
    @DrewberTravels Před 3 lety +1

    2:44 you just taught me more than 4 years of american high school.

  • @ninjadingle
    @ninjadingle Před 3 lety +1

    Hey - any chance on a Mega Project on the C130 Hercules? 😊

    • @helmsscotta
      @helmsscotta Před 3 lety

      That would require pictures of Arkansas. Probably not going to happen.

  • @woosh101011
    @woosh101011 Před 3 lety +1

    missed opportunity to coin "Bananometer"

  • @andrewwagoner7093
    @andrewwagoner7093 Před 3 lety +3

    Has anyone put the DNA sequence into binary? TA = 0 and CG = 1 or vice versa to see what happens?

    • @id104335409
      @id104335409 Před 3 lety +3

      It assembles a computer virus.

    • @Lowmanification
      @Lowmanification Před 3 lety +1

      It doesn't work like that. You are thinking of the base pairing between the helices (+ strand interacting with - strand), not the sequence of the strand itself. You would need to use two digits to define each base (A=00, T=01, C=10, G=11). Which value you assign to each base is irrelevant. Additionally, you will need to define whether you are looking at the + or - strand, since that will alter the final code you generate.

  • @lazygamerz
    @lazygamerz Před 3 lety +1

    And the year of its final conclusions being published, 2005, the cure for cancer was proposed. An intervention into the hTERT gene and ALT mechanism of telomere-lengthening would mean cells could no longer come back endlessly, so once you fight off cancer once with chemotherapy, it can't return, only new cancers can occur, cancers that aren't copies of the most resistant to chemotherapy (or whatever other drugs you used). The treatment known as WILT (whole body interdiction of lengthening of telomeres) also includes stem-cell treatments to replenish stem-cells in tissues where continuous cell-division is needed (like stomach lining). And any organs you get grown, won't be able to grow cancer.
    Sadly, WILT is currently not being pursued at all, due to lack of funding. Instead all of cancer research is focused on treatments that kill 99.99% of cancer cells instead of 99.9%, and then 99.999% instead of 99.99%, etc. But that just means 0.01% most resistant cancer cells divide and come back ten-twenty years later, instead of the returning cancer being copies of the 0.1% most resistant cancer cells. So if you gave drug mix A the first time, that won't work the next time, so you use drug mix B, and then it comes back a third time, and of course few cancers today have a drug mix C. Once we get the newest hope in cancer drugs, that aim to use the immune-system to target cancers, that will be version C, but then ten years later another batch of cancer patients start to die from lack of a drug D.
    "Why should we fund the human genome project? What will it do?" - "Cure Cancer" - "Ok lets do it" - (15 years later) "Ok we're ready now, we learned how to cure cancer" - "Don't care, me and my fellow politicians are 70 years old and won't live to see it".

  • @StLouis-yu9iz
    @StLouis-yu9iz Před 3 lety

    Suggestion: Please do a video about the Gateway Arch and National Park in downtown St Louis, U.S. ty :]

  • @newmoney402
    @newmoney402 Před 3 lety

    Do one on the project that raised the street level in downtown Omaha Nebraska

  • @devzeppelin1911
    @devzeppelin1911 Před 3 lety

    You should do the Panama canal

  • @deanswift9132
    @deanswift9132 Před 3 lety

    It’s easy to see how the beings that made us made a few slip ups - typos

  • @stagearc
    @stagearc Před 3 lety

    Please make a video about the Kowloon walled city

  • @BennyColyn
    @BennyColyn Před 3 lety +2

    Perhaps a relevant detail - much of what was developed for the HGP in terms of rapid sequencing technology and fast PCR has been invaluable in the current pandemic, both in diagnosing it and in finding and tracking the spread of different variants. If we hadn't bothered with it in the 90's we'd be far worse of now.

  • @seanbrazell6147
    @seanbrazell6147 Před 3 lety +1

    Every time I see a banana now it will be with an air of suspicion.

  • @texan-american200
    @texan-american200 Před 2 lety

    Well it's a good thing that they completed the original human genome project before the Chicoms introduced their own edited version.

  • @mauriceupton1474
    @mauriceupton1474 Před 4 měsíci

    Think about it.
    If it takes computers to unravel the genome, we were engineered. (ATCG, microbiological software)

  • @matthewdopler8997
    @matthewdopler8997 Před 3 lety

    One major aspect worth mentioning is the massive advances in technology for DNA sequencing. In 2000, it would cost you $100 million to sequence your genome. Now you can do it for $1000.

    • @jayajora
      @jayajora Před 2 lety

      Why would you sequence ?

  • @dustydarkhorse
    @dustydarkhorse Před 3 lety +1

    I'm really really impressed that you actually went into the chemistry that keeps DNA together, well done

  • @PeteNalty63
    @PeteNalty63 Před rokem +1

    Can decades of potential work be accelerated by quantum computers?

  • @sasidharan97
    @sasidharan97 Před 3 lety

    can you make a video on DNA sequencing