@@toegobbler6373they certainly weren't replicas. Just so you know, ACM (Automobile Club de Monaco) won't allow replicas to race there. They won't even allow recreations with original parts!
Forget the money, it's bloody shame to watch these beautiful historic cars being bent. I cringe watching this... Don't stop posting though, I love watching them race, they need better drivers.
Does anyone know why they don't race 90s F1 cars on historic races? Is it because they are on the verge of too fast but with too little safety? And a lot of crashes will happen meaning its expensive
Actually, they're really hard to control, nowadays they are considered as historic so yeah it's painfull to see them crash... but back in the days they also crashed, so it's just normal, going at full speed with a cars has risks...
That one guy near the beginning in the 40s or 50s car didn’t even have a seat belt?! Nothing wrong with adding that basic safety device to vintage cars.
because those cars have shocking brakes, they take twice as long as a road car would to stop at equivalent speeds which is bad considering its meant to be a race car
This happens when you put current drivers in old cars without the technology they are used to. This is why old drivers have much more merit as drivers, it was more difficult to drive before.
@@michaelgemiouk SOMEBODY has to pay for the repair- do yo think parts for these are free??? Is the skill of the person fixing it FREE? Even is insurance pays for it (makes it free for owner)- the insurance company STILL pays for it...
@@jimcurt99 they are on track I don’t thing insurance pay for it you will be suprice on it they not only fix they keep it run all year if not they go bang parts are cheap to compare the fix that care are store in specials places free of rust 🤤🤤
Im not "suprice' - I'm sure insurance Won't cover it- then it's up to the owner- your first comment said it would be "free"- you are wrong- $$$$$$$ lost- someone PAYS @@michaelgemiouk
I would rather have these priceless machines be somewhere like Silverstone or Monza so they don’t get destroyed. Out of all places, to quote Mazes🅱️in, “I’m in Monaco for fuck’s sake.” The only safe enough runoffs are Sainte Devote, Mirabeau, Nouvelle Chicane (if you over shoot it completely), and the final chicane at the pool section (if you over shoot the first turn).
Carnage... A game for golden boys who can afford it maybe, but the price is too high in truly historic cars damage ! What happens at 4:24 is really stupid.
The Charles Leclerc Crash, Don't worry it wasn't the OG Niki Lauda car, it was a copy, they wrote Charles Leclerc's name on the side of the car, which they would not do that on the OG car cuz how much Historic cars mean to ferrari.
c'est scandaleux il n' y a rien à gagner et on détruit des voitures qui ont un patrimoine historique énorme . Qu'ils apprennent à rouler sur des voitures à pédales.
You would not bring your priceless Ferrari to this event if you are afraid of it getting damaged. That same Ferrari crashed in this event last year too with Jean Alesi at the wheel.
These are not professional drivers, these are people with big pockets and drives there own cars for fun. Except Leclerc I guess but the brakes fail for him so not much his fault.
Thing is, most of these aren't really driver error. Those offs at Saint Devote and that pileup at Anthony Noghes of 1950s F1 cars, that's almost certainly oil or fluid spilled on track, judging by how they lost it.
@@aitor9158they just watch all the crashes and say such narrow minded things... They need to do their homework to know that the drivers here weren't here for an exhibition, they're here to race. And they are more than qualified to do so... Though I can see that some backmarkers need to look at their mirrors more often...
They go too serious. I love F1... But someone is gonna die doing this. Any more than 5/10ths is just dumb in these cars in this day and age. My love for this soured yesterday watching the pre-war class slugging it out.
These cars are driving around one of the slowest track you can find, with lots of added safety devices. Out of all historic races, this is probably one of the safest where you can still go flat. Goodwood is way, way way worse. This is safe enough.
@@rpzpacific2332 I live right next to Goodwood. Well, did. If nobody had ever died at Monaco, I would agree. But that is not the case. They are going too hard just to amuse dickheads that most likely don't know any better. They have got quicker and harder the last few years. Something WILL happen, then, they will end this. Sorry to be an old man shaking his fist at clouds.
@@blacktoothfox677 there has only ever been one fatality at Monaco which was Lorenzo Bandini i believe during the mid 60s which just demonstrates that the track is just slow and safe as fuck (no fatalities during 70s and most of the 60s and 50s). No one is getting killed anytime soon especially with all these new safety improvements to barriers etc.
@@alexmoir-barnetson8984 Don't be ridiculous - There is nothing safe about these cars at speed. I fear time will prove me correct. You are perfectly entitled to your opinion; just as those that resisted Jackie Stewarts efforts were; I am afraid, sir, such arguments as those you make, are just as unfortunate as those, then. Nothing is gonna change my mind. I've loved F1 since the day Keke ruffled my hair trackside, so, you know. It's not like I'm coming from DTS. I do not think the way these historic races are going, is good. They are getting too serious, going too hard, and someone will die. End of. Yes you may say; "oh the driver is prepared to take the risk", & I will counter your slow-track argument with the actual state of the cars in saftey terms. But there are families at those races, enjoying the thrill of seeing obsolete engines. There is no need to push those old beautiful beasts hard, and shower little timmy and his mum with blood and burning fuel. Coz that WIOLL end it, you know. I say 5/10ths. No ambitious moves. When I have attended these events, i enjoy the sounds and sights of wonderful machinery, real legends before my eyes. I don't need to see them pushed quite so hard. I say again; I fear I see what is coming. All the best to you, and hope you enjoy Barcelona's upgrades.
Painfull but love that they keep racing this amazing machines
They will certainly be repaired for next year
Monaco is the last place I’d want to drive an old F1 car.
i think they are replicas
@@bjoe385 0:20 imagine that in monza or another circuit
@@toegobbler6373they certainly weren't replicas.
Just so you know, ACM (Automobile Club de Monaco) won't allow replicas to race there. They won't even allow recreations with original parts!
It must be great to be so rich that you can play a weekend F1 warrior with priceless machines.
it’s literally the teams who own the cars putting them on the track lol
or even the PEOPLE that own them and loan them out
Well Charles his strat worked: you cant crash twice at Monaco, so crashing early got him P4
incidents happen:
marshalls: 🟩🟩🟩
That’s because they wave green to signal there is danger behind the marshal.
Forget the money, it's bloody shame to watch these beautiful historic cars being bent. I cringe watching this... Don't stop posting though, I love watching them race, they need better drivers.
they all get fixed for next year dw
But that's what they've been made for. Racing.
Looks painfull to me also, but that's how it is.
Does anyone know why they don't race 90s F1 cars on historic races? Is it because they are on the verge of too fast but with too little safety? And a lot of crashes will happen meaning its expensive
Actually, they're really hard to control, nowadays they are considered as historic so yeah it's painfull to see them crash... but back in the days they also crashed, so it's just normal, going at full speed with a cars has risks...
@@R9naldoI think it's because they were still considered "not so old"...
That one guy near the beginning in the 40s or 50s car didn’t even have a seat belt?! Nothing wrong with adding that basic safety device to vintage cars.
If you roll one I think you'd be better off being thrown from it instead of trapped underneath it, bit like a motorbike
Nah i wouldnt modify any classic car
The cars were so dangerous it’s safer to get thrown out
You can't modify a Historique car. It's one of the rules of the competition. You have to race them as they were.
@@vintagevideogamenights2923 there are modern roll bars on some of the 30-50s cars
Charles and the home grand prix curse
che Figata! spettacolo!
4:37 made me laugh idk how that can happen
because those cars have shocking brakes, they take twice as long as a road car would to stop at equivalent speeds which is bad considering its meant to be a race car
@@WETiLAMBY what do you expect from brakes from the 1950s?
Oil or fluid in the track, judign by how the driver lost the Connaught. It happened at the end of the race.
This happens when you put current drivers in old cars without the technology they are used to. This is why old drivers have much more merit as drivers, it was more difficult to drive before.
I used to feel sorry for this, but now I enjoy seeing these machines being raced as they must be.
Como siempre.... Millennialls
What kind of drivers are these???
Basically just a bunch of rich amateur drivers.
Racing drivers...
one car almost had a bad fire in a 70's car
I’m glad even if they do crash they have the money to restore these great machines
Glad they drive them- but I wonder how much $$$ we just saw go down the toilet???
Most that cars are fix for free is pleaser to work on it 🫡 and see it run again next years
@@michaelgemiouk SOMEBODY has to pay for the repair- do yo think parts for these are free??? Is the skill of the person fixing it FREE? Even is insurance pays for it (makes it free for owner)- the insurance company STILL pays for it...
@@jimcurt99 they are on track I don’t thing insurance pay for it you will be suprice on it they not only fix they keep it run all year if not they go bang parts are cheap to compare the fix that care are store in specials places free of rust 🤤🤤
Im not "suprice' - I'm sure insurance Won't cover it- then it's up to the owner- your first comment said it would be "free"- you are wrong- $$$$$$$ lost- someone PAYS @@michaelgemiouk
I would rather have these priceless machines be somewhere like Silverstone or Monza so they don’t get destroyed. Out of all places, to quote Mazes🅱️in, “I’m in Monaco for fuck’s sake.” The only safe enough runoffs are Sainte Devote, Mirabeau, Nouvelle Chicane (if you over shoot it completely), and the final chicane at the pool section (if you over shoot the first turn).
I think monaco makes it better then
More entertainting and dangerous means more fun
@@aitor9158 i disagree cause you spend most of your time watching safety car or race gets cut short if there to many crashes.
Brasil . Precisão parar com essas corridas estão acabando com essas máquinas maravilhosa stop Race
This is painful to watch!
Always great to see rich people tear up their stuff and not even care.
Ferrari damage🤣🤣
No heroics into Saint Devote please
Carnage... A game for golden boys who can afford it maybe, but the price is too high in truly historic cars damage ! What happens at 4:24 is really stupid.
The Charles Leclerc Crash, Don't worry it wasn't the OG Niki Lauda car, it was a copy, they wrote Charles Leclerc's name on the side of the car, which they would not do that on the OG car cuz how much Historic cars mean to ferrari.
No it's not, these are all original cars
@@AndreiTupolev really, why would they write Leclerc's name in the side of the car?
@@alt2484 because he was the one driving it, and he's Ferrari's current star? 🤔
@@AndreiTupolev yeah but still i wouldn't expect them to put that on such a historical car.
sm bad happens to nikis car every year i swear
c'est scandaleux il n' y a rien à gagner et on détruit des voitures qui ont un patrimoine historique énorme . Qu'ils apprennent à rouler sur des voitures à pédales.
"Boyhood dream ... to grow up in Monaco and dream of ..." (5:50) 🙈😳😶
No es circuito para hacer correr estas joyas
imagine crashing a priceless Ferrari ffs hahhaahah
Hilarious.
It's objectively better than letting sit in some garage/museum. It's being raced which is how Enzo would've wanted it
You would not bring your priceless Ferrari to this event if you are afraid of it getting damaged. That same Ferrari crashed in this event last year too with Jean Alesi at the wheel.
The technology to make the parts for it is simple. It's wayyy cheaper to make now. Besides the parts aren't original.
0:25 terrible dangerous cars!
Do any of these drivers get to drive for the owners of these cars ever again, I wonder?
If I were this green helmet guy in the Ensign I would have stopped before crashing again. I hope that was is car... Some of these guys are reckless !
Money makes no good driver, but destroys technical culture.
Money can also repair technical culture.
We dont need these money-monkeys, which neurotical try to be in media and cannot drive.
These guys really need to get their act together. There were never that many crashes in the original races, I'm sure.
ikr, its supposed to be a special car show, not a full on race
These are not professional drivers, these are people with big pockets and drives there own cars for fun. Except Leclerc I guess but the brakes fail for him so not much his fault.
@@aaaaaaaawwwwwwww exactly Alex
@@aaaaaaaawwwwwwwwit's not a special car show, it's a historic race from the very beginning.
Thing is, most of these aren't really driver error.
Those offs at Saint Devote and that pileup at Anthony Noghes of 1950s F1 cars, that's almost certainly oil or fluid spilled on track, judging by how they lost it.
Scary bad drivers.
Video fatto malissimo
Why are these dumb pilots allowed to destroy this beautiful old cars?
@@windfall7154 isn't he?
Because they are the owners.
they are going to play with this, until someone dies.
that's exactly my thinking. This is way too dangerous.
@@NickeyF1 better, closer you are from death more you feel alive
Poor Charles Leclerc...This is what happens when you are not able to drive a manual transmission. Leave it to the real pros of the era.
He lost his brakes
@@TR-mf1gr LOL!!!
@@1983dmd npc
@@1983dmd you know the car is as shit as it is, lauda kind of hate the car
@windfall Nope...
Lambs brains makes entertaining viewing... A war is happening, let's go break some toys!
They destroyed pieces of F1 history, this event should be banned at all
You should be banned for wanting them to colect dust rather than racing
@@aitor9158they just watch all the crashes and say such narrow minded things...
They need to do their homework to know that the drivers here weren't here for an exhibition, they're here to race. And they are more than qualified to do so... Though I can see that some backmarkers need to look at their mirrors more often...
They go too serious.
I love F1... But someone is gonna die doing this.
Any more than 5/10ths is just dumb in these cars in this day and age.
My love for this soured yesterday watching the pre-war class slugging it out.
Shut up and have fun, the drivers know the risks and there's a reason it's at monaco
These cars are driving around one of the slowest track you can find, with lots of added safety devices. Out of all historic races, this is probably one of the safest where you can still go flat. Goodwood is way, way way worse. This is safe enough.
@@rpzpacific2332 I live right next to Goodwood. Well, did.
If nobody had ever died at Monaco, I would agree. But that is not the case.
They are going too hard just to amuse dickheads that most likely don't know any better. They have got quicker and harder the last few years. Something WILL happen, then, they will end this.
Sorry to be an old man shaking his fist at clouds.
@@blacktoothfox677 there has only ever been one fatality at Monaco which was Lorenzo Bandini i believe during the mid 60s which just demonstrates that the track is just slow and safe as fuck (no fatalities during 70s and most of the 60s and 50s). No one is getting killed anytime soon especially with all these new safety improvements to barriers etc.
@@alexmoir-barnetson8984 Don't be ridiculous - There is nothing safe about these cars at speed. I fear time will prove me correct. You are perfectly entitled to your opinion; just as those that resisted Jackie Stewarts efforts were; I am afraid, sir, such arguments as those you make, are just as unfortunate as those, then.
Nothing is gonna change my mind.
I've loved F1 since the day Keke ruffled my hair trackside, so, you know. It's not like I'm coming from DTS.
I do not think the way these historic races are going, is good. They are getting too serious, going too hard, and someone will die. End of.
Yes you may say; "oh the driver is prepared to take the risk", & I will counter your slow-track argument with the actual state of the cars in saftey terms.
But there are families at those races, enjoying the thrill of seeing obsolete engines. There is no need to push those old beautiful beasts hard, and shower little timmy and his mum with blood and burning fuel. Coz that WIOLL end it, you know.
I say 5/10ths. No ambitious moves. When I have attended these events, i enjoy the sounds and sights of wonderful machinery, real legends before my eyes. I don't need to see them pushed quite so hard. I say again; I fear I see what is coming.
All the best to you, and hope you enjoy Barcelona's upgrades.